Next Article in Journal
Second-Order Discrete-Time Sliding Mode Observer for State of Charge Determination Based on a Dynamic Resistance Li-Ion Battery Model
Previous Article in Journal
Emergy Evaluation of the Urban Solid Waste Handling in Liaoning Province, China
Energies 2013, 6(10), 5507-5537; doi:10.3390/en6105507
Article

An Optimization Framework for Comparative Analysis of Multiple Vehicle Powertrains

* ,
 and
Received: 30 July 2013; in revised form: 3 October 2013 / Accepted: 7 October 2013 / Published: 22 October 2013
Download PDF [3301 KB, uploaded 22 October 2013]
Abstract: With a myriad of alternative vehicle powertrain architectures emerging in the industry, such as electric vehicles and hybrid electric vehicles, it is beneficial that the most appropriate system is chosen for the desired vehicle class and duty cycle, and to minimize a given cost function. This paper investigates this issue, by proposing a novel framework that evaluates different types of powertrain architectures under a unified modular powertrain structure. This framework provides a systematic and objective approach to comparing different types of powertrain architectures simultaneously, and will highlight the benefits that can be achieved from each architecture, thus making it possible to develop the reasoning for manufacturers to implement such systems, and potentially accelerate customer take-up of alternative powertrain technology. The results from this investigation have indicated that such analysis is indeed possible, by way of identifying the “cross-over point” between powertrain architectures, where one powertrain architecture transitions into a different architecture with increments in the required travel range.
Keywords: hybrid electric vehicle; modular powertrain structure; genetic algorithm; powertrain optimization hybrid electric vehicle; modular powertrain structure; genetic algorithm; powertrain optimization
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Mohan, G.; Assadian, F.; Longo, S. An Optimization Framework for Comparative Analysis of Multiple Vehicle Powertrains. Energies 2013, 6, 5507-5537.

AMA Style

Mohan G, Assadian F, Longo S. An Optimization Framework for Comparative Analysis of Multiple Vehicle Powertrains. Energies. 2013; 6(10):5507-5537.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohan, Ganesh; Assadian, Francis; Longo, Stefano. 2013. "An Optimization Framework for Comparative Analysis of Multiple Vehicle Powertrains." Energies 6, no. 10: 5507-5537.


Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert