Bayesian Energy Measurement and Verification Analysis
AbstractEnergy Measurement and Verification (M&V) aims to make inferences about the savings achieved in energy projects, given the data and other information at hand. Traditionally, a frequentist approach has been used to quantify these savings and their associated uncertainties. We demonstrate that the Bayesian paradigm is an intuitive, coherent, and powerful alternative framework within which M&V can be done. Its advantages and limitations are discussed, and two examples from the industry-standard International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP) are solved using the framework. Bayesian analysis is shown to describe the problem more thoroughly and yield richer information and uncertainty quantification results than the standard methods while not sacrificing model simplicity. We also show that Bayesian methods can be more robust to outliers. Bayesian alternatives to standard M&V methods are listed, and examples from literature are cited. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Carstens, H.; Xia, X.; Yadavalli, S. Bayesian Energy Measurement and Verification Analysis. Energies 2018, 11, 380.
Carstens H, Xia X, Yadavalli S. Bayesian Energy Measurement and Verification Analysis. Energies. 2018; 11(2):380.Chicago/Turabian Style
Carstens, Herman; Xia, Xiaohua; Yadavalli, Sarma. 2018. "Bayesian Energy Measurement and Verification Analysis." Energies 11, no. 2: 380.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.