Next Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Split Injection Strategies on Combustion and Emission in an Opposed-Piston, Opposed-Cylinder (OPOC) Two-Stroke Diesel Engine
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Small-Scale Power Plant Supporting Schemes on the Public Trader and Consumers
Previous Article in Journal
Reducing Fuel Consumption in Hydraulic Excavators—A Comprehensive Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Non-Stationary Magnetic Field Sources Using the Matching Pursuit Method
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(5), 683;

Assessment of Energy Storage Operation in Vertically Integrated Utility and Electricity Market

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Unska 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
Croatian Transmission System Operator Ltd., Kupska 4, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
This paper is an extended version of our paper published in Luburić, Z.; Pandžić, H.; Plavšić, T. Comparison of Energy Storage Operation in Vertically Integrated and Market-Based Power System. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering 2016, Florence, Italy, 7–10 June 2016.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Rodolfo Araneo
Received: 15 February 2017 / Revised: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 10 May 2017 / Published: 12 May 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [910 KB, uploaded 12 May 2017]   |  


The aim of this paper is to compare the operational pattern of an energy storage system (ESS) in a vertically-integrated utility and in a deregulated market environment for different levels of wind integration. As the main feature of a vertically-integrated utility is a centralized decision-making process, all of the investment and operating decisions are made with a single goal of minimizing the overall system operating costs. As a result, an ESS in such an environment is operated in a way that is optimal for the overall system economics. On the other hand, the system operator in a deregulated market has less power over the system resources, and commitment and dispatch decisions are a result of the market clearing procedure. In this setting, the ESS owner aims at maximizing its profit, which might not be in line with minimizing overall system operating costs or maximizing social welfare. To compare the ESS operation in these two environments, we analyze the storage operation in two different settings. The first one is a standard unit commitment model with the addition of centrally-controlled storage. The second one is a bilevel model, where the upper level is a coordinated ESS profit maximization problem, while the lower level a simulated market clearing. The case study is performed on a standardized IEEE RTS-96 system. The results show a reduction in the generation dispatch cost, online generation capacity and wind curtailment for both models. Moreover, ESS significantly increases social welfare in the market-based environment. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy storage; unit commitment; mixed-integer linear programming; day-ahead electricity market energy storage; unit commitment; mixed-integer linear programming; day-ahead electricity market

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Luburić, Z.; Pandžić, H.; Plavšić, T. Assessment of Energy Storage Operation in Vertically Integrated Utility and Electricity Market . Energies 2017, 10, 683.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top