Next Article in Journal
Wide Area Information-Based Transmission System Centralized Out-of-Step Protection Scheme
Next Article in Special Issue
Economics and Resources Analysis of the Potential Use of Reprocessing Options by a Medium Sized Nuclear Reactor Fleet
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Assessment of Biodiesel Blends Proposed by the New Mexican Policy Framework
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimal Allocation of Energy Storage System Considering Multi-Correlated Wind Farms
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(5), 632; doi:10.3390/en10050632

Case Study on the Socio-Economic Benefit of Allowing Active Power Curtailment to Postpone Grid Upgrades

SINTEF Energy Research, NO-7465 Trondheim, Norway
Agder Energi Nett AS, NO-4848 Arendal, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Josep M. Guerrero
Received: 22 December 2016 / Revised: 22 March 2017 / Accepted: 28 April 2017 / Published: 5 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable and Renewable Energy Systems)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2640 KB, uploaded 5 May 2017]   |  


The penetration of distributed generation is rapidly increasing in the power system. Traditionally, a fit-and-forget approach has been applied for grid integration of distributed generation, by investing in a grid capacity that can deal with worst-case situations. However, there is now increasing interest for the possible cost savings that can be achieved through more active network management. This paper presents a case study on the possible socio-economic benefit of postponing a grid upgrade in an area of surplus generation. Two alternatives for grid integration of an 8 MW run-on-river hydro power plant in the southern part of Norway are investigated: (i) grid upgrade; and (ii) active power curtailment whenever needed to avoid network congestion. This study shows that cost savings corresponding to 13% of the investment cost for the grid upgrade is possible through active power curtailment. View Full-Text
Keywords: active power curtailment; network planning; cost-benefit analysis; case study active power curtailment; network planning; cost-benefit analysis; case study

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kolstad, M.L.; Wolfgang, O.; Josefsen, R.H. Case Study on the Socio-Economic Benefit of Allowing Active Power Curtailment to Postpone Grid Upgrades. Energies 2017, 10, 632.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top