Next Article in Journal
Evaluation and Reliability Assessment of GaN-on-Si MIS-HEMT for Power Switching Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Potential for Energy Production from Farm Wastes Using Anaerobic Digestion in the UK: An Economic Comparison of Different Size Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Soot Particle Concentration and Emissivity by Transient Thermocouples Measurements in Laminar Partially Premixed Coflow Flames
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Biogas Production on Farmland Rental Prices: Empirical Evidences from Northern Italy
Article Menu
Issue 2 (February) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Energies 2017, 10(2), 239; doi:10.3390/en10020239

Greenhouse Gas Mitigation of Rural Household Biogas Systems in China: A Life Cycle Assessment

1
Center for Resources, Environment and Food Security, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
2
Center for Animal Health and Productivity, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA 19348, USA
3
Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
4
School of Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Wales LL57 2UW, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 30 November 2016 / Accepted: 3 January 2017 / Published: 16 February 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Economics of Bioenergy 2016)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [2300 KB, uploaded 17 February 2017]   |  

Abstract

Rural household biogas (RHB) systems are at a crossroads in China, yet there has been a lack of holistic evaluation of their energy and climate (greenhouse gas mitigation) efficiency under typical operating conditions. We combined data from monitoring projects and questionnaire surveys across hundreds of households from two typical Chinese villages within a consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) framework to assess net GHG (greenhouse gas) mitigation by RHB systems operated in different contexts. We modelled biogas production, measured biogas losses and used survey data from biogas and non-biogas households to derive empirical RHB system substitution rates for energy and fertilizers. Our results indicate that poorly designed and operated RHB systems in northern regions of China may in fact increase farm household GHG emissions by an average of 2668 kg CO2-eq· year−1, compared with a net mitigation effect of 6336 kg CO2-eq per household and year in southern regions. Manure treatment (104 and 8513 kg CO2-eq mitigation) and biogas leakage (-533 and -2489 kg CO2-eq emission) are the two most important factors affecting net GHG mitigation by RHB systems in northern and southern China, respectively. In contrast, construction (−173 and −305 kg CO2-eq emission), energy substitution (−522 emission and 653 kg·CO2-eq mitigation) and nutrient substitution (−1544 and −37 kg CO2-eq emission) made small contributions across the studied systems. In fact, survey data indicated that biogas households had higher energy and fertilizer use, implying no net substitution effect. Low biogas yields in the cold northern climate and poor maintenance services were cited as major reasons for RHB abandonment by farmers. We conclude that the design and management of RHB systems needs to be revised and better adapted to local climate (e.g., digester insulation) and household energy demand (biogas storage and micro power generators to avoid discharge of unburned biogas). More precise nutrient management planning could ensure that digestate nutrients are more effectively utilized to substitute synthetic fertilizers. View Full-Text
Keywords: biogas; manure storage; energy substitution; subsidy; small-scale; subsistence farming biogas; manure storage; energy substitution; subsidy; small-scale; subsistence farming
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hou, J.; Zhang, W.; Wang, P.; Dou, Z.; Gao, L.; Styles, D. Greenhouse Gas Mitigation of Rural Household Biogas Systems in China: A Life Cycle Assessment. Energies 2017, 10, 239.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Energies EISSN 1996-1073 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top