Next Article in Journal
Chemical Characteristics and NaCl Component Behavior of Biochar Derived from the Salty Food Waste by Water Flushing
Previous Article in Journal
A New Control Method for a Bi-Directional Phase-Shift-Controlled DC-DC Converter with an Extended Load Range
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Vitiation on a Swirl-Stabilized and Premixed Methane Flame

Department of Energy Sciences, Lund University, Ole Römers väg 1, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2017, 10(10), 1557; https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101557
Submission received: 3 September 2017 / Revised: 27 September 2017 / Accepted: 28 September 2017 / Published: 10 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Section I: Energy Fundamentals and Conversion)

Abstract

:
Vitiation refers to the condition where the oxygen concentration in the air is reduced due to the mix of dilution gas. The vitiation effects on a premixed methane flame were investigated on a swirl-stabilized gas turbine model combustor under atmospheric pressure. The main purpose is to analyze the combustion stability and CO emission performance in vitiated air and compare the results with the flame without vitiation. The N2, CO2, and H2O (steam) were used as the dilution gas. Measurements were conducted in a combustor inlet temperature of 384 K and 484 K. The equivalence ratio was varied from stoichiometric conditions to the LBO (Lean Blowout) limits where the flame was physically blown out from the combustor. The chemical kinetics calculation was performed with Chemkin software to analyze the vitiation effects on the flame reaction zone. Based on the calculation results, the changes in the temperature gradient, CO concentration, and active radicals across the flame reaction zone were identified. The time-averaged CH chemiluminescence images were recorded and the results indicated the features of the flame shape and location. The CH signal intensity provided the information about the heat-release zone in the combustor. The combustion LBO limits were measured and the vitiation of CO2 and H2O were found to have a stronger impact to elevate the LBO limits than N2. Near the LBO limits, the instability of the flame reaction was revealed by the high-speed chemiluminescence imaging and the results were analyzed by FFT (Fast Fourier Transfer). CO emission was measured with a water-cooled probe which is located at the exit of the combustor. The combustion vitiation has been found to have the compression effect on the operation range for low CO emission. However, this compression effect could be compensated by improving the combustor inlet temperature.

1. Introduction

Due to environmental problems, the low emission combustion technologies have attracted considerable attention. In the combustion concept, with the consideration of reducing pollutant emissions, the operating condition where combustion happens in the air with reduced oxygen concentration, so-called vitiated air, is commonly encountered. Regarding the combustion research field, the vitiated air refers to the air containing additional gas which is neither fuel nor oxygen. The air vitiation is commonly achieved by the recirculation of exhaust gas into the fresh air stream (referred to as exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), the burning of landfill gas (approximately forty to sixty percent is methane, with the remainder being mostly CO2), and the use of a staged combustion system, e.g., with additional fuel injection after the primary reaction zone. Vitiated air generally includes the combustion products such as CO2, H2O, CO, NOx and unburned hydrocarbons, along with N2 and O2.
The vitiated air has been used in many practical combustion systems, e.g., gas turbine combustors, furnaces, and piston engines, in order to reduce pollutant emissions and improve thermal efficiency [1]. Compared to normal air, vitiated air has a lower oxygen concentration and contains a different composition which impacts the chemical and physical properties of the reactant mixtures. Hence, the process of fuel oxidation and flame propagation could be affected, which could make the burning of the fuel in vitiated air differ from what happens in pure air. For most combustion devices, the primary vitiation species are N2, CO2, and H2O (steam). Therefore, investigation of the vitiation effects of N2, CO2, and H2O are the main objectives of the current work.
In combustion applications like EGR, N2, CO2, and H2O constitute the majority of the vitiated air. CO2 and H2O were found to have a strong effect on chemical kinetics, while N2 was found to predominantly have the thermal effect [2,3]. The previous study results indicated that CO2 had an inhibiting effect on the fuel oxidation process [2,4]. More analysis on the chemical effect of CO2 vitiation showed that the reduction of the fuel oxidation rate was primarily determined by the reaction CO + OH CO2 + H [5,6]. Hence a negative effect on the combustor operation range with low CO concentration can be expected due to the CO2 vitiation. H2O vitiation was found to have a positive chemical kinetic effect due to its contribution to the increase of H and OH radicals which come from the reaction step O + H2O OH + OH [7,8,9] and H2O H + OH (the dissociation of the steam under high temperature) [10]. The thermal effect of the vitiation results in a reduction of the flame temperature, which makes the vitiated combustion a feasible method for achieving NOx reduction. CO emission has been studied in oxyfuel combustion where fuel is burned in O2/CO2 circumstance. The results showed that CO2 had a significant effect on the increase of CO concentration [11]. The H2O vitiation effect on CO was also examined and the results showed that the CO did not seem to be affected significantly [12]. The vitiation effect of N2 and CO2 on the LBO limits of the methane flame was investigated, and the results showed that CO2 had a stronger effect on the LBO increase [13]. A similar effect on LBO limits was observed in methane combustion with steam vitiation [14].
According to the previous work, few experimental investigation results were exhibited to compare the effects of the primary vitiation species, e.g., N2, CO2, and H2O. Hence, in present work, the vitiation effects of N2, CO2, and H2O were investigated with a swirl-stabilized gas turbine model combustor under atmospheric pressure. Measurements were conducted at the conditions where 10%, 20%, and 30% mole fraction of the air was substituted by N2, CO2, and H2O (steam), respectively. Chemical kinetics calculations were performed to understand the vitiation effects on the flame reaction zone by using the Chemkin software [15] and the GRI-mech 3.0 mechanism [16]. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence images were captured to evaluate the flame shapes, anchored location, and intensity of the heat-release. The LBO limits of flame with and without vitiation were examined and compared to two combustor inlet temperatures (384 K/484 K). The flame instability prior to LBO was recorded by using the high-speed broadband chemiluminescence. CO emissions were measured at the combustor exit with a water-cooled probe. The current paper contributes to a better understanding of the vitiated flame on the stable and low CO operation, and the results will bolster the development of environmentally friendly combustion technologies.

2. Experimental Facilities

2.1. Experimental and Operating Configuration

The flow paths and experimental setup are shown in Figure 1. There are two air flows, one fuel flow, and three vitiation gas flows which can be supplied into the combustor. The air fed into the combustor was supplied from a pressurized lab air source. The air from both the axial direction and the tangential direction were controlled and measured by using differential pressure mass flow controllers (MCR250, Alicat Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA). The methane fuel with 99.98% purity was supplied from the gas cylinder. A differential pressure mass flow controller (MCR50, Alicat Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used to measure and control the fuel flow. Then, the methane was mixed with the air flow from the tangential direction. The vitiation gas (CO2, N2, and steam) was injected into the tangential flow at the upstream location of the tangential heater. CO2 and N2 were supplied from pressurized gas bottles. Steam was provided by a steam generator which contains ten Omega LDC00261 low-density cartridge heaters with a total maximum electrical power of 3 kW. Adjustment of the steam flow could be achieved by controlling the water flow with a precision water flow controller (LC series, Alicat Scientific, Tucson, AZ, USA). An auto-tune temperature and process controller (CN63200-F1-AL, Omega, Stamford, CT, USA) was used so that the steam temperature at the outlet of the steam generator could be controlled. Before coming into the combustor, the blends of the reactants were mixed in the swirler which was followed by a mixing tube of 60 mm. The required equivalence ratios (Ф) can be achieved by adjusting the methane flow. The equivalence ratio used in current work was defined:
Ф = m ´ f u e l / m ´ o x i d i z e r ( m ´ f u e l / m ´ o x i d i z e r ) s t o i
where, m ´ denotes the mass flow rate and suffix stoi represents the stoichiometric condition. The combustor inlet temperature could be adjusted by using the feedback-controlled air heaters (Sureheat Jet, Sylvania, Exeter, NH, USA) with a power of 8 kW. The combustor inlet temperature was detected by a K-type thermocouple with a diameter of 1.5 mm and an accuracy of 2.2 K. The combustion exhaust was discharged from the combustor by a force-ventilated extractor hood during the measurements.
Figure 2 depicts the gas turbine model combustor that is mounted on a pneumatic actuator system. The cylindrical combustor has an overall length of 350 mm and consists of two sections. The upper section is made of metal and the lower section is a quartz liner with 120 mm length, which makes it possible for flame visualization and optical measurements. The flow from the axial and tangential direction was mixed in the swirler that is mounted at the upstream location of the combustor inlet. Prior to the swirler, a sintered flow straightener with an average porosity of 200 μm was used to generate a more homogeneous velocity for the flow from the axial direction. Four channels with 3 mm wide and 10 mm high were designed for the entering of the flow from tangential direction. The proportions of the flow from axial and tangential direction are adjustable so that the swirl number used in the experiments can be altered. In order to illustrate the swirl strength, the nondimensional swirl number is defined:
S = G r R G a
where S represents the swirl number, G r denotes the axial flux of the radial momentum, R is the radius of the swirler, and G a is the axial flux of the axial momentum. G r and G a in the above equation can be calculated as:
G r = 2 π 0 R ρ U V r 2 d r
G a = 2 π 0 R ρ U 2 r d r
where ρ is the gas density, U is the axial velocity, and V is the radial velocity. For the purpose of determining the swirl number under different flow conditions, the axial and radial velocity profiles were measured with Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA) in previous work, and a relationship between radial to axial momentum ratio and swirl number was established. It should be noted that distinctive flow field could be obtained with different swirl numbers.
The main parameters of the experiments operation are shown in Table 1. The flame LBO limits were obtained by gradually decreasing the methane flow until the flame was physically away from the combustor. In order to avoid flame LBO due to the large sudden changes, the methane flow was reduced with the smallest step (equivalent to 0.00636 in equivalence ratio) allowed by the mass flow controller.

2.2. Flame Visualization

In order to study the vitiation effects on the flame shapes and anchored locations, the time-averaged CH chemiluminescence were captured by a CCD camera (D70s, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an AF Nikkor lens (50 mm/F1.8D, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) and a band-pass CH filter (430/10, LaVision, Göttingen, Germany). An exposure time of 0.77 s and a resolution of 3008 × 2000 pixels were used in the measurements. The aperture was set into f/1.8 throughout all the experiments. A high-speed CMOS camera (Vision Research Phantom V611) was used to capture the broadband flame chemiluminescence. The fluctuation of the chemiluminescence intensity could be used to indicate the dynamics of the local heat-release. The recording frequency was 1 kHz and the resolution is 1280 × 800 pixels.

2.3. CO Emission Measurement

The CO emission was measured by a Rosemount Binos 100 NDIR (nondispersive infrared photometers) CO/CO2 gas analyzer with a measurement uncertainty of 5 ppm. The exhaust gas sample was collected by a water-cooled probe which is mounted at the exit of the combustor. The average sampling of the exhaust gas was ensured by the multiple holes on the emission probe. Prior to the emission analyzer, an exhaust gas cooler was used to avoid the condensing of the steam contained in the collected sample gas. In order to reduce the errors of emission analysis, the emission analyzers were calibrated every time prior to the experiments with standard calibration gases.

2.4. Chemical Calculation

In order to understand the vitiation effects on the chemical reactions in the flame reaction zone, chemical kinetics calculation was involved in present work. The calculation was carried out with the usage of Chemkin-Pro software package and the GRI-Mech 3.0 mechanism. An equilibrium reactor was used for the adiabatic flame temperature calculation for a wide range of equivalence ratios. The flame reaction zone was modeled by a premixed laminar flame speed calculation reactor [17], based on which the important changes in species concentration, temperature, etc., can be observed.

3. Results and Discussion

The premixed turbulent combustion is a complex process which is determined by many factors, e.g., chemical reactions, turbulent flow, and heat and mass transfer. Therefore, the flame stability and emission performance strongly depend on these factors and the interactions among them. In the case of using reactant stream with different composition, the variation in physical properties and the chemical kinetics probably lead to new characteristics in combustion progress. In order to study the characteristics of vitiated methane flame, 10%, 20%, and 30% mole fraction of the air was substituted by N2, CO2, and steam, respectively. The mole fraction of vitiation gas was defined as the vitiation ratio which was used in the results analysis.

3.1. Reaction Zone Characteristics

In the premixed combustion, most of the chemical reactions occur in a narrow zone which is referred to as the reaction zone. The reaction zone separates the unburned reactant mixtures and the combustion products. Significant changes in temperature, combustion intermediate radicals, fuel, oxidizer, etc., are observed across the reaction zone. Figure 3 shows the comparison of temperature profile across the flame reaction zone at equivalence ratio 0.8 and the vitiation effects on the adiabatic flame temperature at the equivalence ratio range of 0.3 to 1. The results were calculated, respectively, with a premixed laminar flame speed calculation reactor and equilibrium reactor in Chemkin software. Based on Figure 3a, a reduction in temperature gradient was observed with 20% vitiation gas, which indicated a decrease in chemical reaction rate. In Figure 3b, as a result of the changes in chemical and physical properties of the reactant mixtures, the final adiabatic flame temperature of vitiated flame had a significant decrease compared to the flame without vitiation. Among the three vitiation gas, combustion with 20% CO2 had the minimum flame temperature. This was probably due to its specific heat capacity and the inhibiting effect on CO oxidization.
Figure 4 shows the concentration of H, O, OH, and CO across the flame reaction zone. A comparison of the concentration of these species has been made for the vitiated flame and flame without vitiation. The data were calculated with the premixed laminar flame speed calculation reactor in Chemkin software. Based on the data, there was a great concentration gradient between the unburned reactant mixtures and the reaction zone. Compared to the flame with no vitiation, the concentration of H, O, OH, and CO of the vitiated flame decreased significantly. With 20% vitiation ratio, the reduction in species concentration was expected because the amount of the active radicals was less due to the fact that less oxygen was available for the chemical reactions. If only the dilution effect of the vitiation plays a role in the chemical reactions, the concentration of the same species shown in Figure 4 should stay the same regardless of the type of vitiation. However, the data in Figure 4 clearly shows that the concentration of H, O, OH, and CO strongly depends on the type of the vitiation. This means, besides the vitiation dilution effect, the vitiation species can influence the combustion reaction process in a more complicated way due to the different chemical properties, physical properties, and the interaction between them.
By comparing the species concentration with the vitiation of N2, CO2, and H2O, N2 was found to have minimum changes in active radical concentration. In other words, N2 had a minimum influence on combustion process among the three vitiation gas. The primary reason could be that the adiabatic flame temperature with N2 is higher than that with CO2 and H2O. As a result, the reaction rate is enhanced and the radical concentration is higher. In the flame reaction zone, the CO2 and H2O had a close peak concentration for H radical. A similar performance for O radical was observed with the vitiation of CO2 and H2O. With N2 vitiation gas, the peak concentration of H and O radicals was about double that with CO2 and H2O. According to the OH concentration profile across the reaction zone, it was observed that the H2O and N2 vitiation gas had almost the same peak concentration, although the adiabatic flame temperature with H2O vitiation gas was lower. This can be explained by the results of the previous research work, which indicated that more OH radicals were produced based on the chemical reaction step O + H2O OH + OH [8,9]. At high flame temperature, the steam dissociation could also contribute to OH production [10]. The flame vitiated with CO2 had the lowest adiabatic flame temperature according to the data in Figure 3. However, it showed a CO peak concentration which was comparable to flame with N2 vitiation. Studies have shown that the CO oxidation is primarily determined by the reaction step CO + OH CO2 + H [18]. Hence, the 20% CO2 vitiation and lower concentration of OH could lead to a higher CO concentration in the flame reaction zone.

3.2. Flame Visualization

In the present measurement, the characteristics of vitiated flames were investigated with a swirl number of 0.58, which can produce a center recirculation zone in the combustor, according to the previous particle image velocimetry (PIV) measurement. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence was used to provide the information about the flame shapes, stabilized location, flame length, and so on. Figure 5 depicts the flame shape’s response to the vitiation of N2, CO2, and H2O with 10% vitiation ratio. The high CH intensity area circled by the red dashed line could provide the indication for the main reaction zone. For the flame without vitiation, the CH intensity was stronger compared to the flame with vitiation. The 10% N2 did not make significant changes on flame shape, however—the CH intensity in the main reaction zone was lower. It can be seen from Figure 5 that CO2 and H2O had an observable influence on the flame height and the location of the main reaction zone. With 10% CO2, the flame height was increased and the flame root had a tendency to detach from the edge of the combustor inlet. The lower CH intensity in the main reaction zone showed CO2 had a stronger inhibiting effect on the chemical reaction than N2. This is probably due to the relatively larger heat capacity of CO2 and its negative effect on CO oxidization. The H2O seemed to have the maximal reduction in CH intensity; at the same time, there was a small lift-off height between the flame root and the combustor inlet. This indicated that the chemical reaction rate was decreased greatly by H2O. This could be due to the high emissivity of steam, which leads to a remarkable heat loss.
Figure 6 illustrates the comparison of flame shapes for the three vitiation species at the vitiation ratio of 10% and 20%. At the equivalence ratio of 0.98, with the increase of vitiation ratio from 10% to 20%, a substantial reduction of CH intensity was observed for N2, CO2, and H2O. For N2, the CH images showed that the flame stabilized position was slightly shifted downstream. With 20% CO2, four stabilized positions of flame were achieved. Two of the stabilized positions were shifted downstream, compared to 10% CO2 case. The other two were located upstream at the combustor corner. A minimal CH intensity was observed in flame with 20% steam vitiation. Even at the main reaction zone, a much stronger chemical reaction rate was still not observed. Therefore, it could be expected that the flame with 20% steam has a weak flame stabilization ability compared with the other vitiated flames.

3.3. The LBO of Vitiated Flame

The flame LBO should be avoided in practice combustor operation. Hence, it is essential to know the LBO limits in order to have an economical and safe operation. The LBO limits, defined as the LBO equivalence ratio, were determined by gradually reducing the fuel until the flame was physically away from the combustor. LBO limits were measured for the premixed methane flame with vitiation of N2, CO2, and H2O. 10%, 20%, and 30% vitiation ratio were examined at combustor inlet temperature of 484 K. Figure 7a shows the vitiation effect on the LBO limits. For all the vitiation species, the LBO limits went up with the increase of vitiation ratio. It was found that the LBO limits with the vitiation of CO2 and H2O had a similar trend which was highlighted by the shadow region. Compared to the flame vitiated by CO2 and H2O, the vitiation ratio had a relatively small influence on flame vitiated by N2. The reason for the LBO limits trend in Figure 7a could be understood based on the discussion in Section 3.1, where the vitiation effects on the flame reaction zone were analyzed. In Figure 7b, the LBO limits were analyzed based on the Damköhler number at the LBO condition. The Damköhler number was defined as:
D a = τ r e s / τ c h e m
which is a time scale ratio between the residence time and the chemical reaction time. Regarding the calculation method for the Damköhler number, the readers are suggested to refer to the previous work [14].
The dashed line in Figure 7b shows a two-dimensional flammability range, which is controlled by the equivalence ratio flammability limit and the Damköhler number flammability limit. Above the equivalence ratio flammability limit, a sufficiently high temperature is guaranteed to keep the combustion reaction rate (in other words, to keep the flame propagation). However, although the flame can propagate towards the unburned premixed reactant mixtures, the propagation speed may be lower than the flow speed, which will lead to the combustion LBO. Based on a time concept, it is to say an adequate time must be ensured to complete the chemical reaction in order to avoid LBO. Therefore, it is important to know the critical Damköhler number limit above which the flame can survive in the combustor. According to Figure 7b, the changes of vitiation species and vitiation ratio did not have a significant influence on the Damköhler number flammability limit.
Figure 8a shows the comparison of LBO limits between combustor inlet temperature of 384 K and 484 K with 10% vitiation ratio. The results indicated that the higher combustor inlet temperature could extend the LBO limits to the lower level. Figure 8b shows the adiabatic flame temperature at the LBO limits. The vitiation ratio influence on the adiabatic flame temperature was examined with 484 K combustor inlet temperature. The results indicated that higher vitiation ratio could lead to an increase of the adiabatic flame temperature at LBO. The data marked with the dashed line shows the comparison between 484 K and 384 K. According to the results, the inlet temperature influence on the adiabatic flame temperature at LBO is very little.
In the vicinity of LBO limits, the flame reaction zone can be very sensitive to the heat loss from the flame, the fluctuation of the high strain rate, and the local equivalence ratio. Therefore, the local flame extinction and flame re-ignition process can happen [19]. The local flame extinction can detach the flame from its stabilized location and the flame re-ignition process can make the flame propagate back to the previously stabilized place again. This flame instability behavior sometimes can stop the flame re-ignition and attachment process, which finally leads to the LBO. Figure 9 shows the flame re-ignition and detachment phenomena which were recorded by the high-speed chemiluminescence imaging at a frequency of 1 kHz. Due to the usage of swirling flow, the flame had a rotating movement along the combustor center line besides the flame movements in the vertical direction. At 0 ms, it was observed that the flame stayed away from the dump plane of the combustor. Later, the flame re-ignition and attachment process were observed, which made the flame travel upstream (from 2 ms to 6 ms). The flame was found in the outer recirculation zone for a short time interval (from the time 7 ms to 12 ms). Then, the flame detachment was found, which made the flame travel downstream along the combustor liner. In the end, a complete flame detachment from the dump plane and the outer recirculation zone was achieved. The described flame unstable phenomena can be observed in all the examined flame cases when approaching the LBO limits.
According to the previous literature, the flame chemiluminescence is correlated with time-dependent variation of heat-release rate [20]. Therefore, the dynamics of high-speed chemiluminescence are very helpful for providing the information of heat-release rate fluctuation, which is essentially produced by the coupling of fluctuation between the heat-release and the pressure. The high-speed chemiluminescence was recorded in time sequence. The spatial average of intensity was calculated for each image and the time-dependent fluctuation of the average intensity was analyzed by FFT (Fast Fourier Transform). Figure 10 illustrates the FFT analysis result, which shows the frequency peaks for the chemiluminescence intensity oscillation observed in the proximity of LBO. Results showed that the dominant frequency of intensity fluctuation was not affected significantly by the 10% vitiation gas.

3.4. The Vitiation Effects on CO Emission

In this section, the CO emission performance of vitiated flames was examined with three vitiation ratios and two combustor inlet temperatures. Figure 11 shows a comparison of CO concentration in the combustion products between the flame without vitiation and the flame with 10% vitiation ratio. In order to compare the vitiation effect on CO emission, a concentration limit was defined at 25 ppm below which the CO is considered acceptable. Figure 11a shows that the combustion operated in a very lean condition leads to a high CO concentration in the combustion products. This is due to the low flame temperature, which can reduce the chemical reaction rate for CO oxidation. The equivalence ratios where CO equals to 25 ppm are denoted by L1, L2, L3, and L4, and the subscript stands for the corresponding flame case. Figure 11b shows the equivalence ratio range from 0.65 to 0.85, where the CO of all flames is smaller than 25 ppm. In this range, the flame temperature was increased and the CO oxidation rate was improved; therefore, the CO concentration was reduced. It was observed that the flame with 10% CO2 vitiation basically had the same CO performance compared to the flame without vitiation. The CO behavior with CO2 vitiation could be understood from the two contrary effects on the CO emission. One is the inhibiting effect on CO formation which has been indicated by many studies. The other one is the flame temperature reduction effect which weakens the dissociation from CO2 to CO. In the end, the CO concentration is determined by the joint effects of the two contrary effects. With 10% N2 and 10% H2O vitiation, a more and more obvious CO reduction effect was found as the increase of equivalence ratio. This was probably because the adiabatic flame temperature is low, hence the CO2 dissociation is not strong. Figure 11c shows the CO profile when approaching stoichiometric condition; the dissociation of CO2 plays a more important role and yields an increase of CO concentration. The equivalence ratios where CO equals to 25 ppm are denoted by H1, H2, H3, and H4.
Figure 11a–c shows the CO concentration trend along the increase of equivalence ratio. The operation with CO lower than 25 ppm was only possible between the two equivalence ratio limits which are shown in Figure 11d. It was found that the 10% vitiation gas led to a smaller equivalence ratio range for CO lower than 25 ppm. Among the three vitiation species, CO2 had the most significant effects on low CO operation.
Figure 12(a1,b1,c1) shows a comparison of CO profile with the vitiation ratio of 10%, 20%, and 30%. Figure 12(a2,b2,c2) shows the dependency of CO on the adiabatic flame temperature. As the increase of vitiation ratio, the flame temperature was decreased. Therefore, at the LBO side, the CO rise due to the low flame temperature shifted to higher equivalence ratios. This tendency has been presented in Figure 12(a1,b1,c1). At the side where the equivalence ratio was close to 1, the CO rise was found in all the flames. A common phenomenon was that the higher vitiation ratio made the location where CO had a rapid rise shift to lower adiabatic flame temperatures. This was the result of the joint effects of the CO oxidation rate and the CO2 dissociation rate. When the CO2 dissociation rate was stronger than the CO oxidation rate due to the dilution effects of the vitiation, the CO concentration was increased even the flame temperature is not high.
Figure 12(a2,b2,c2) shows that there was a limit of vitiation ratio, above which the CO was never below 25 ppm (even the temperature was still high). This is because the CO oxidation rate is not only determined by flame temperature but also by the reactant concentration. A very high vitiation ratio could lead to a reaction rate which is not sufficiently fast to complete the CO reaction in a limited residence time in the combustor. The vitiation ratio limit was proven to be determined by the vitiation species by the current results in Figure 12(a2,b2,c2). It could be observed that the vitiation limit of N2 was larger than 30%. However, for CO2 and H2O, their vitiation limits were below 30%.
Figure 13(a1,b1,c1) shows the CO profile in a scale range from 0 to 50 ppm, so that the vitiation effects can be observed when CO was low. Comparing the vitiation of N2, CO2, and H2O, a reduction of equivalence ratio range was found for CO emission below 25 ppm, as the increase of vitiation ratio. With 30% vitiation, CO was never below 25 ppm for the vitiation of CO2 and H2O. The adiabatic flame temperature range for the CO below 25 ppm is shown in Figure 13(a2,b2,c2). The results indicated that the increase of vitiation ratio resulted in a smaller temperature region for low CO operation.

4. Conclusions

An experimental investigation was performed on a premixed and swirl-stabilized gas turbine model combustor at atmospheric pressure. The characteristics of the vitiated methane combustion have been demonstrated. 10%, 20%, and 30% mole fraction of the air were substituted by N2, CO2, and steam, respectively. The vitiation effects on the flame shapes, anchored location, LBO limits, and CO emission were studied experimentally. The measurement techniques, such as time-averaged CH chemiluminescence, high-speed broadband chemiluminescence, and CO emission monitoring were employed to characterize the features of the vitiated flame. Due to the variation of physical and chemical properties of the reactant mixtures, the chemical kinetics calculation was conducted to investigate vitiation effects on the flame reaction zone. Based on the analysis of the experimental and chemical kinetics calculation results, the below conclusions can be summarized as:
  • The chemical kinetics calculation showed a clear discrepancy of the flame reaction zone between the flame without vitiation and the vitiated flame. The calculation results revealed that across the flame reaction zone, the temperature gradient, the concentration of radicals (H, O, and OH), and CO emission were decreased by the vitiation. A reduction in adiabatic flame temperature was also found with the vitiation. Among the vitiation of N2, CO2, and H2O, N2 had the minimum influence on the flame reaction zone.
  • The time-averaged CH chemiluminescence showed that both the flame shapes and anchored location were affected by the vitiation. The increase in vitiation ratio (10% to 30%) could lead to the alteration of flame shapes and the reduction of CH intensity. Among the three types of vitiation, H2O was found to have the maximum influence, the next was CO2, and the N2 had the minimum influence.
  • LBO limits and flammability boundaries of the Damköhler number were identified. Measurements results showed that the LBO limits were increased by the vitiation species; however, the increase could be compensated for by improving the combustor inlet temperature. With the vitiation of CO2 and H2O, LBO limits had a similar increase tendency with the vitiation ratio rise between 10% and 30%. However, for the flame vitiated by N2, the LBO limits increased at a slower rate. A significant influence on the Damköhler number flammability limit was not found with the changes of vitiation species and the vitiation ratio.
  • High-speed broadband chemiluminescence showed a common flame re-ignition and detachment process prior to the LBO limits. For this process, the time-dependent fluctuation of the average broadband intensity was analyzed by FFT and the results showed that flames vitiated by N2, CO2, and H2O had approximately the same peak frequency.
  • A reduction of the equivalence ratio range for low CO operation (below 25 ppm) was found in vitiated flames. Among the three vitiation species, CO2 has the most significant effects. It should be noticed that the CO concentration in the combustion products was determined by the joint impacts of flame temperature, reactant concentration, and vitiation species. Low CO operation was not possible with a sufficiently high vitiation ratio.
Overall, the present work provided an insight into the vitiated combustion. In the vitiated flames, the limit of the vitiation ratio existed below which a stable flame operation with low CO emission was possible, with a constant combustor inlet temperature.

Acknowledgments

The China Scholarship Council (CSC) has provided a great support for the authors Mao Li and Yiheng Tong. The authors acknowledge with the sincerest thanks.

Author Contributions

The experimental measurements and article writing were performed by Mao Li; experimental results were analyzed by Mao Li and Yiheng Tong; the paper proof-reading and revision were done by Marcus Thern and Jens Klingmann.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cavaliere, A.; de Joannon, M. Mild Combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2004, 30, 329–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Le Cong, T.; Dagaut, P. Kinetics of natural gas, natural gas/syngas mixtures oxidation and effect of burnt gas recirculation: Experimental and detailed modeling. Proc. GT2007 ASME Turbo Expo 2007, 130, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  3. Tabacco, D.; Innarella, C.; Bruno, C. Theoretical and numerical investigation on flameless combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2002, 174, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lissianski, V.; Yang, H.; Qin, Z.; Mueller, M.; Shin, K.; Gardiner, W. High-temperature measurements of the rate coefficient of the H+ CO2 → CO+ OH reaction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 240, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, F.; Guo, H.; Smallwood, G.J. The chemical effect of CO2 replacement of N2 in air on the burning velocity of CH4 and H2 premixed flames. Combust. Flame 2003, 133, 495–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Le Cong, T.; Dagaut, P.; Dayma, G. Oxidation of natural gas, natural gas/syngas mixtures, and effect of burnt gas recirculation: Experimental and detailed kinetic modeling. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2008, 130, 041502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meitner, P.L.; Senick, P.; Laganelli, A.; Lear, W.E. Demonstration of a Semi-Closed Cycle, Turboshaft Gas Turbine Engine. ASME Pap. 2000, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Park, J.; Kim, S.C.; Keel, S.I.; Noh, D.S.; Oh, C.B.; Chung, D. Effect of steam addition on flame structure and NO formation in H2–O2–N2 diffusion flame. Int. J. Energy Res. 2004, 28, 1075–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hwang, D.J.; Choi, J.W.; Park, J.; Keel, S.I.; Ch, C.B.; Noh, D.S. Numerical study on flame structure and NO formation in CH4–O2–N2 counterflow diffusion flame diluted with H2O. Int. J. Energy Res. 2004, 28, 1255–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Katoh, A.; Shinoda, M.; Kitagawa, K.; Gupta, A.K. Visualization of Steam Addition Effect on OH Distribution in a Flame by Isotope Shift/Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence (IS/PLIF) Spectroscopy. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 2006, 128, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, M.; Tong, Y.; Thern, M.; Klingmann, J. Investigation of Methane Oxy-Fuel Combustion in a Swirl-Stabilised Gas Turbine Model Combustor. Energies 2017, 10, 648. [Google Scholar]
  12. Goke, S.; Terhaar, S.; Schimek, S.; Göckeler, K.; Paschereit, C.O. Combustion of natural gas, hydrogen and bio-fuels at ultra-wet conditions. In Proceedings of the ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–10 June 2011; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 659–670. [Google Scholar]
  13. Karbasi, M.; Wierzba, I. Prediction and validation of blowout limits of co-flowing jet diffusion flames—Effect of dilution. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 1998, 120, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, M.; Tong, Y.; Thern, M.; Klingmann, J. Influence of the Steam Addition on Premixed Methane Air Combustion at Atmospheric Pressure. Energies 2017, 10, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kee, R.; Rupley, F.; Miller, J. Chemkin-Pro 15112; Reaction Design: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith, G.P.; Golden, D.M.; Frenklach, M.; Moriarty, N.W.; Eiteneer, B.; Goldenberg, M.; Bowman, C.T.; Hanson, R.K.; Song, S.; Gardiner, W.C., Jr. GRI-Mech 3.0. Available online: http://www.me.berkeley.edu/gri_mech (accessed on 15 August 2017).
  17. CHMKIN-PRO 15112. ChemKin Tutorials Manual; Reaction Design: San Diego, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Walton, S.; He, X.; Zigler, B.; Wooldridge, M. An experimental investigation of the ignition properties of hydrogen and carbon monoxide mixtures for syngas turbine applications. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 3147–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stöhr, M.; Boxx, I.; Carter, C.; Meier, W. Dynamics of lean blowout of a swirl-stabilized flame in a gas turbine model combustor. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 2953–2960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Boxx, I.; Stöhr, M.; Carter, C.; Meier, W. Temporally resolved planar measurements of transient phenomena in a partially pre-mixed swirl flame in a gas turbine model combustor. Combust. Flame 2010, 157, 1510–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Experimental test facility.
Figure 1. Experimental test facility.
Energies 10 01557 g001
Figure 2. Swirl-stabilized combustor with optical access and swirler cross-section.
Figure 2. Swirl-stabilized combustor with optical access and swirler cross-section.
Energies 10 01557 g002
Figure 3. The vitiation effects on (a) the flame temperature profile in the flame reaction zone at equivalence ratio = 0.8 and (b) the adiabatic flame temperature with 20% vitiation ratio at combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Figure 3. The vitiation effects on (a) the flame temperature profile in the flame reaction zone at equivalence ratio = 0.8 and (b) the adiabatic flame temperature with 20% vitiation ratio at combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Energies 10 01557 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of intermediate radicals and CO in the flame reaction zone at 20% vitiation ratio, equivalence ratio = 0.8 and combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Figure 4. Comparison of intermediate radicals and CO in the flame reaction zone at 20% vitiation ratio, equivalence ratio = 0.8 and combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Energies 10 01557 g004
Figure 5. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence shows the vitiated flames with vitiation ratio = 10% and equivalence ratio = 0.89.
Figure 5. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence shows the vitiated flames with vitiation ratio = 10% and equivalence ratio = 0.89.
Energies 10 01557 g005
Figure 6. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence shows the vitiation ratio effects on vitiated flames, equivalence ratio = 0.98.
Figure 6. Time-averaged CH chemiluminescence shows the vitiation ratio effects on vitiated flames, equivalence ratio = 0.98.
Energies 10 01557 g006
Figure 7. The influence of vitiation on (a) combustion Lean Blowout (LBO) limits and (b) the flammability boundaries of Damköhler number and equivalence ratio, at 484 K combustor inlet temperature.
Figure 7. The influence of vitiation on (a) combustion Lean Blowout (LBO) limits and (b) the flammability boundaries of Damköhler number and equivalence ratio, at 484 K combustor inlet temperature.
Energies 10 01557 g007
Figure 8. The combustor inlet temperature influence on (a) LBO limits of vitiated flame and (b) the dependence of the Adiabatic flame temperature on vitiation ratio.
Figure 8. The combustor inlet temperature influence on (a) LBO limits of vitiated flame and (b) the dependence of the Adiabatic flame temperature on vitiation ratio.
Energies 10 01557 g008
Figure 9. The high-speed broadband chemiluminescence images in time sequence, which show the flame re-ignition and detachment process without vitiation. Equivalence ratio is 0.5 and combustor inlet temperature is 484 K.
Figure 9. The high-speed broadband chemiluminescence images in time sequence, which show the flame re-ignition and detachment process without vitiation. Equivalence ratio is 0.5 and combustor inlet temperature is 484 K.
Energies 10 01557 g009
Figure 10. Comparison of Fast Fourier Transfer (FFT) analysis results for the vitiation effects on the heat-release dynamics at the condition close to the LBO limits.
Figure 10. Comparison of Fast Fourier Transfer (FFT) analysis results for the vitiation effects on the heat-release dynamics at the condition close to the LBO limits.
Energies 10 01557 g010
Figure 11. The effects of three types vitiation on CO emission performance along the equivalence ratio range of (a) 0.45 to 0.65; (b) 0.65 to 0.85; and (c) 0.85 to 1.00; (d) shows the comparison of equivalence ratio range for low CO operation with the 484 K combustor inlet temperature and 10% vitiation ratio.
Figure 11. The effects of three types vitiation on CO emission performance along the equivalence ratio range of (a) 0.45 to 0.65; (b) 0.65 to 0.85; and (c) 0.85 to 1.00; (d) shows the comparison of equivalence ratio range for low CO operation with the 484 K combustor inlet temperature and 10% vitiation ratio.
Energies 10 01557 g011
Figure 12. Vitiation ratio effects on CO emission with combustor inlet temperature of 484 K. (a1,a2) shows the N2 effects; (b1,b2) shows the CO2 effects; (c1,c2) shows the H2O effects.
Figure 12. Vitiation ratio effects on CO emission with combustor inlet temperature of 484 K. (a1,a2) shows the N2 effects; (b1,b2) shows the CO2 effects; (c1,c2) shows the H2O effects.
Energies 10 01557 g012
Figure 13. The equivalence ratio range under the vitiation of (a1) N2, (b1) CO2, (c1) H2O, and the corresponding adiabatic flame temperature range with the vitiation ratio of (a2) 10%, (b2) 20%, (c2) 30%, for low CO emission operation at combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Figure 13. The equivalence ratio range under the vitiation of (a1) N2, (b1) CO2, (c1) H2O, and the corresponding adiabatic flame temperature range with the vitiation ratio of (a2) 10%, (b2) 20%, (c2) 30%, for low CO emission operation at combustor inlet temperature of 484 K.
Energies 10 01557 g013
Table 1. Experimental Operating Conditions.
Table 1. Experimental Operating Conditions.
Operation ParameterUnitsTitleUncertainty
Fuel[-]CH4 (99.98%)[-]
Fuel flow rate(g/s)0.075–0.175±0.002
Air flow rate(g/s)2.96–2.07±0.02
Equivalence ratio[-]1–LBO limits0.01
Swirl number[-]0.58±0.01
Preheated temperature(K)384/484±2
Vitiation species[-]N2/CO2/H2O[-]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Tong, Y.; Klingmann, J.; Thern, M. Impact of Vitiation on a Swirl-Stabilized and Premixed Methane Flame. Energies 2017, 10, 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101557

AMA Style

Li M, Tong Y, Klingmann J, Thern M. Impact of Vitiation on a Swirl-Stabilized and Premixed Methane Flame. Energies. 2017; 10(10):1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101557

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Mao, Yiheng Tong, Jens Klingmann, and Marcus Thern. 2017. "Impact of Vitiation on a Swirl-Stabilized and Premixed Methane Flame" Energies 10, no. 10: 1557. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101557

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop