Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Acute Respiratory Infections in Women and Children in Western Sierra Leone due to Smoke from Wood and Charcoal Stoves
Next Article in Special Issue
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Evaluate a Health Education Programme “Living with Sun at School”
Previous Article in Journal
Decomposition Analysis of Wastewater Pollutant Discharges in Industrial Sectors of China (2001–2009) Using the LMDI I Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gain-Framed Messages Do Not Motivate Sun Protection: A Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Trials Comparing Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Appeals for Promoting Skin Cancer Prevention
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Psychosocial Correlates of Sunburn among Young Adult Women

1
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
2
Portland VA Medical Center, 3810 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA
3
Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
4
Cancer Prevention and Control Program, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9(6), 2241-2251; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062241
Submission received: 28 April 2012 / Revised: 25 May 2012 / Accepted: 8 June 2012 / Published: 18 June 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sunbathing Habits and Skin Cancer)

Abstract

:
Skin cancer is an increasingly common disease, particularly among young adult women. Sunburn early in life is a risk factor for skin cancer. Few studies have reported on psychosocial correlates of sunburn. The current study consisted of an online survey of undergraduate women from a university in the northeastern part of the USA. A logistic regression demonstrated that young women who reported a history of four or more sunburns were significantly more likely to report fair skin, higher perceived susceptibility to skin cancer, greater perceived benefits of tanning (e.g., appearance enhancement), lower perceived control over skin protection, and more frequent sunscreen use. Sunbathing was not associated with a greater number of sunburns. These results suggest that young women who sunburn more often possess other skin cancer risk factors, are aware of their susceptibility to skin cancer, and try to use sunscreen, but feel limited control over their skin protection behavior and are not less likely to sunbathe than others. Therefore, interventions are needed to assist high risk young women in asserting more control over their sun protection behavior and perhaps improve the effectiveness of the sunscreen or other skin protection methods they do employ.

1. Introduction

Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer in the USA, accounting for half of all human malignancies, with over two million new cases diagnosed yearly [1]. The incidence of skin cancer has been rising faster than that of any other cancer [2]. In recent years, the incidence of melanoma, the most deadly form of skin cancer, has more than doubled among young women aged 15–29 years, from 5.5 to 13.9 cases per 100,000 [3]. While most skin cancers are not fatal, they are becoming increasingly common, costly, and can have devastating effects on health and appearance.
Sixty to ninety percent of all melanomas can be attributed to ultraviolet (UV) radiation [4,5], and UV is considered the single most significant modifiable risk factor in the prevention of melanoma [2]. Sunburns increase the risk of melanoma, particularly repeated blistering sunburns during childhood and adolescence [6,7]. Sunburn during childhood can double the risk for the development of melanoma in adulthood [8,9]. A recent review of national studies found that the incidence of past year sunburn among adolescents ages 11–18 years was 68.7% [10]. One in three US adults also reports burning during the past year, with rates being highest among young adults aged 18–29 years (57.5%) [10].
Studies of the correlates of sunburn have focused on demographic variables such as gender, race, and age, with most of these studies finding that young white women are most likely to report a history of sunburns [10,11,12,13]. Few studies have examined psychosocial correlates of sunburn. Studies of USA and European adolescents and adults found associations between more frequent sunburn and positive attitudes towards tanning and tanned skin, as well as having a social network who tans [14,15,16,17]. A national study of US adolescents found a positive association between sunburn and sunscreen use [18]. A recent study found that perceived susceptibility to burns was associated with burning during indoor tanning [19].
No study, to our knowledge, has applied a theoretical model to predicting sunburns. The Health Belief Model addresses motivational factors for behaviors associated with disease risk, such as perceived susceptibility to and severity of diseases such as skin cancer, perceived benefits of and barriers to associated behaviors (e.g., tanning and skin protection), self-efficacy and control over behaviors, and behavioral intentions [20]. HBM variables have been used to predict sunbathing and sun protection behaviors but not sunburn per se [21,22,23]. Examining psychosocial variables associated with sunburn may be valuable given the prevalence of sunburns and the increased risk of melanoma in those who have experienced sunburn, particularly during childhood and early adulthood [6].
The purpose of the current study was to explore potential correlates of sunburn in a high risk population of young adult women. The variables included in the analyses were biological (fair skin, family history of skin cancer), attitudinal from the HBM (perceived benefits of tanning and barriers to sunscreen use, perceived severity of and susceptibility to skin cancer and damage, self-efficacy for skin protection, perceived control over tanning and skin protection, and intentions to avoid tanning and protect the skin), and behavioral (sunbathing and sunscreen use).

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Female undergraduates at a university (N = 509: 93% of the 546 individuals who initially consented for the study) in the northeastern part of the USA completed the questionnaires. Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 25 years (M = 19.8, SD = 1.6). Racial distribution was as follows: 66.5% White, 16.2% Asian-American, 12.2% Other/Mixed, and 4.9% Black/African-American. Four percent of the sample identified as Hispanic or Latino.

2.2. Measures

2.2.1. Biological Factors

Participants were asked to indicate the color of their untanned skin, with possible choices being very fair, fair, medium light, medium (olive), medium dark, and very dark. This is one item used to help determine Fitzpatrick skin type [24,25]. Participants who indicated that they had very fair or fair skin were categorized as fair-skinned (due to greater risk of skin cancer and sunburn in those with fair skin). All others were considered darker than fair-skinned. Participants were also asked if they had a family member with skin cancer.

2.2.2. Perceived Severity and Susceptibility

Perceived health and emotional impact severity of skin cancer and photo-aging was assessed using a four-item measure by Aiken and colleagues [26]. Items were scored on a 1 to 5 Likert-type scale of agreement (e.g., “The health consequences of developing skin cancer are severe”). This measure demonstrated adequate internal consistency in our study (α = 0.67). Perceived susceptibility to skin cancer was assessed using one item in which participants were asked to indicate their perceived chances of getting skin cancer in the future, compared to other women their own age from 1 = much less to 5 = much more [27].

2.2.3. Benefits of and Barriers to Tanning and Sun Protection

Participants completed three items designed to assess perceived benefits (e.g., for appearance) of tanning (α = 0.88). These items were from Gibbons and colleagues [28], and were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale of agreement (e.g., “Having a tan improves the way most people look”). Perceived barriers (e.g., forgetting) to using sunscreen was assessed using five items adapted from Mahler, Kulik, Gibbons, Gerrard and Harrell [29]. All items (e.g., “Sunscreen is more trouble than it’s worth”) were scored on a five-point Likert-type scale, which was internally consistent (α = 0.70) in our study sample.

2.2.4. Self-Efficacy and Perceived Control over Tanning and Sun Protection

Self-efficacy for using various types of sun protection (e.g., sunscreen, protective clothing) was assessed using a seven-item measure with items scored on a five-point Likert-type scale of agreement [30]. Participants indicated how confident they were that they could engage in sun protection-related behaviors such as “Use sunscreen whenever you are out in the summer for more than 15 minutes”. This measure was internally consistent in our study (α = 0.81). For perceived controllability, participants were asked to indicate how easy or difficult it would be, on a 7 point scale (“1” being “Very difficult”, “7” being “Very easy”), to not intentionally sunbathe and to consistently protect their skin from UV radiation [31].

2.2.5. Behavioral Intentions

Behavioral intentions to avoid tanning and protect the skin from UV radiation were assessed using nine items from Mahler and colleagues [32], all scored on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Intentions to protect the skin from UV radiation was assessed using seven items pertaining to different aspects of skin protection (e.g., sunscreen, protective clothing), with robust internal consistency in our study (α = 0.80). Intentions to avoid tanning were assessed using two items, specifically to “avoid indoor tanning” and “avoid intentionally sunbathing.”

2.2.6. Behavioral Factors

Participants were asked to indicate how many times in their entire lives they have had a red or painful sunburn that lasted a day or more [25]. Using a median split, we categorized participants as having sunburned three or fewer times, or four or more times. This was our outcome variable.
Other behaviors assessed were sunbathing and sunscreen use. Participants indicated how many days on average they spend tanning in the sun each week [33]. Participants were dichotomized into those who spend at least one day a week tanning in the sun versus those who do so less than one day a week. Participants indicated on a scale of 1 to 5 (“1” being “Never”, “5” being “Always”) how often they wear sunscreen when they are in the sun for more than 15 minutes [25]. Self-report of sun exposure and protection behaviors have been found to be reliable and valid [34].

2.3. Procedures

All female psychology students were recruited during the academic school year via e-mail and web through a psychology department research subject pool at a northeastern university in the USA. Psychology 101 is a required introductory course for several majors at the university. After consenting via an online consent form, students completed the online questionnaire at their convenience. Written information about tanning and health resources was given to all participants after participation. Participants were given research participation extra credit for a psychology course and a $20 PayPal voucher as compensation for their participation.

2.4. Data Analysis

Data was assessed for normality, and descriptive statistics were calculated. Chi square analyses and independent samples t-tests were conducted first to examine differences between those who sunburned three or fewer times versus four or more times (based on a median split). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were then conducted to examine associations between sunburns and biological factors (fair skin, family history of skin cancer), attitudinal factors from the HBM (perceived benefits of tanning and barriers to sunscreen use, perceived severity and susceptibility to skin cancer and damage, self-efficacy for skin protection, perceived control over tanning and skin protection, and intentions to avoid tanning and protect the skin), and other behavioral factors (sunbathing and sunscreen use).

3. Results

Table 1 displays frequencies for each variable by number of sunburns (i.e., three or fewer versus four or more). Compared to individuals who had sunburned three or fewer times, those who sunburned four or more times were more likely to report being fair-skinned, χ2(1, N = 509) = 50.81, p < 0.001, having a family history of skin cancer, χ2(1, N = 509) = 28.94, p < 0.001, sunbathing at least one day per week on average, χ2(1, N = 499) = 17.48, p < 0.001, using sunscreen more often, t(505) = −3.16, p < 0.01, perceiving greater susceptibility to skin cancer, t(506) = −5.92, perceiving greater benefits of tanning, t(494) = −6.78, p < 0.001, perceiving fewer barriers to using sun protection, t(507) = 2.87, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, perceiving lower control over tanning, t(506) = 5.43, p < 0.001, and reporting fewer intentions to avoid tanning, t(501) = 3.66, p < 0.001.
Table 1. Characteristics of college women by sunburn status.
Table 1. Characteristics of college women by sunburn status.
VariablesSunburned 3 or fewer times (n = 254)Sunburned 4 or more times (n = 255)p
n (%)n (%)
Fair skinned67 (26.4)146 (57.3)<0.001
Not fair skinned187 (73.6)109 (42.7)
Family history of skin cancer51 (20.1)107 (42.0)<0.001
No family history of skin cancer203 (79.9)148 (58.0)
Sunbathe at least once a day/week96 (38.6)143 (57.2)<0.001
Sunbathe less than once a day/week153 (61.4)107 (42.8)
M (SD)M (SD)
Perceived susceptibility2.3 (1.0)2.9 (1.1)<0.001
Perceived severity4.5 (0.5)4.6 (0.5)0.880
Perceived benefits of tanning3.0 (1.2)3.7 (1.0)<0.001
Perceived barriers of sun protection2.2 (0.7)2.1 (0.7)0.004
Sun protection self-efficacy2.8 (0.9)2.7 (0.7)0.235
Perceived control over tanning4.5 (2.3)3.4 (2.3)<0.001
Perceived control over protection5.0 (1.8)4.8 (1.8)0.106
Intend to avoid tanning5.1 (1.9)4.5 (1.8)<0.001
Intend to protect the skin4.3 (1.3)4.3 (1.3)0.734
Frequency of sunscreen use2.9 (1.2)3.2 (1.1)0.002
Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that fairer skin (OR = 3.30, 95%CI = 2.17, 5.03), more frequent sunscreen use (OR = 1.34, 95%CI = 1.05, 1.71), greater perceived susceptibility of skin cancer (OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.07, 1.62), greater perceived benefits of tanning (OR = 1.39, 95%CI = 1.10, 1.76), and lower perceived control over using sun protection (OR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.75, 0.98) were associated with being sunburned four or more times, when also taking into account family history of skin cancer, sunbathing, perceived skin cancer and damage severity, perceived barriers to using sun protection, sun protection self-efficacy, perceived control over tanning, and behavioral intentions. Results of regression analyses are reported in Table 2.
Table 2. Multivariable model showing associations between sunburn status and biological, attitudinal, and behavioral factors (n = 494).
Table 2. Multivariable model showing associations between sunburn status and biological, attitudinal, and behavioral factors (n = 494).
VariableOR (95%CI)p
Fair skin3.30 (2.17–5.03)<0.001
Family history of skin cancer1.52 (0.96–2.40)0.073
Perceived susceptibility1.32 (1.07–1.62)0.009
Perceived severity0.98 (0.67–1.44)0.920
Perceived benefits of tanning1.39 (1.10–1.76)0.006
Perceived barriers of sun protection0.70 (0.48–1.03)0.068
Sun protection self-efficacy0.90 (0.62–1.29)0.552
Perceived control over tanning0.90 (0.79–1.02)0.101
Perceived control over protection0.86 (0.75–0.98)0.022
Intend to avoid tanning 1.09 (0.93–1.29)0.295
Intend to protect skin1.04 (0.84–1.29)0.748
Sunbathe at least 1 day/week1.04 (0.63–1.74)0.872
Frequency of sunscreen use1.34 (1.05–1.71)0.018

4. Discussion

Skin cancer rates are increasing, particularly among young adult women [2,3,35]. Ultraviolet radiation, especially sunburns early in life, contribute to increased risk for skin cancer [6,7,8,9]. Despite the large literature on sun exposure and protection, the current study is one of the few to evaluate psychosocial correlates of sunburns among high risk young adult women. The data demonstrated that individuals who reported more sunburns were significantly more likely to report fair skin, higher perceived susceptibility to skin cancer and skin damage, higher perceived benefits of tanning, lower perceived control over using skin protection, and more sunscreen use. Variables not associated with greater number of sunburns were perceived severity of skin cancer and damage, sun protection self-efficacy, perceived control over tanning, intentions to avoid sunbathing or skin protection, and sunbathing. Family history of skin cancer and lower perceived barriers to skin protection were associated with a stronger history of sunburns, but these associations did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model.
One wonders whether young adult women acquire sunburns due to biological or psychosocial factors. Based on the current data, it appears that both such factors contribute. Young women who acquire more sunburns do have fairer skin and are slightly more likely to have a family history of skin cancer but perceive greater benefits of tanning and do not engage in less sunbathing than lower risk women. Although young women who get more sunburns report lower perceived control over using skin protection, they report a higher susceptibility to skin cancer and skin damage, slightly lower perceived barriers to sun protection, and use sunscreen more often than women who get fewer sunburns. Thus, women’s sunbathing and sunscreen use behaviors may be counteracting one another in terms of sun safety. Even individuals trying to get a tan typically do not intend to burn and may be somewhat deterred from future burning [36], so the young women who are burning are likely not using sunscreen properly by applying enough broad spectrum sunscreen frequently enough, as has been shown in several prior studies [37,38,39]. In part, there may be a “teachable moment” when those who experience sunburn may initially make a greater effort to protect their skin from skin cancer and photo-aging, as was suggested by a study of students and staff at a university in Turkey [40]. However, some individuals may intend to burn in order to obtain a “base-tan,” which is not recommended.
Lower perceived control over sun protection suggests that young women who get more sunburns would like to use sunscreen more overall but do not follow through successfully when actually in a sunny environment such as a beach or pool. There seems to be a gap between education and awareness on the one hand and actual behavior on the other [41,42,43]. Future research and interventions should continue to explore this gap in order to reduce skin cancer risk among young women. Factors that may prevent behavioral follow-through could include peer pressure to sunbathe or not wear sunscreen or a lack of planning such as not purchasing or bringing sunscreen to sunny locations or reapplying after swimming [44,45]. Some studies have also used more comprehensive measures of sunscreen application that assesses amount used and re-application at appropriate intervals in order to further characterize sunscreen use behavior [25,46]. There also seems to be a conflict between the perceived benefits of tanning such as attractiveness and the desire to protect one’s health from skin damage [11]. This conflict between immediate appearance concerns and later health concerns is difficult to resolve, given that many young individuals prioritize the views of peers over authority figures and may perceive themselves as invulnerable to disease [47,48]. Further changes in societal norms regarding the attractiveness of tans and the importance of health may be required [21].
Strengths of the current study include the relatively large sample size and the use of the HBM. Limitations include the cross-sectional nature of the study and the inclusion of only psychology students from one US college, which may limit generalizability. However, many students are required to take psychology courses, and US college women are an appropriate study population due to their high levels of skin cancer risk behaviors and the increasing skin cancer rates among young women. An additional potential source of bias is that individuals may have been differentially motivated by the incentives provided.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by R03CA1504202 (CH) and P30CA006927 (Cancer Center Grant). The authors would like to thank Jeanne Pomenti, BS for her technical assistance in the preparation of this manuscript and Sara Filseth, BA for her assistance with data collection.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts and Figures from 2012; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2012.
  2. Ibrahim, S.F.; Brown, M.D. Tanning and cutaneous malignancy. Dermatol. Surg. 2008, 34, 460–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Purdue, M.P.; Freeman, L.E.; Anderson, W.F.; Tucker, M.A. Recent trends in incidence of cutaneous melanoma among US caucasian young adults. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2905–2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Glanz, K.; Buller, D.B.; Saraiya, M. Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: State of the evidence and recommendations. Environ. Health 2007, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. El Ghissassi, F.; Baan, R.; Straif, K.; Grosse, Y.; Secretan, B.; Bouvard, V.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Freeman, C.; Galichet, L.; et al. A review of human carcinogens—Part D: Radiation. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 751–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Westerdahl, J.; Olsson, H.; Masback, A.; Ingvar, C.; Jonsson, N.; Brandt, L.; Jonsson, P.E.; Moller, T. Use of aunbeds or aunlamps and malignant melanoma in southern Sweden. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994, 140, 691–699. [Google Scholar]
  7. Green, A.; Siskind, V.; Bain, C.; Alexander, J. Sunburn and malignant melanoma. Br. J. Cancer 1985, 51, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dennis, L.K.; Kim, Y.; Lowe, J.B. Consistency of reported tanning behaviors and sunburn history among sorority and fraternity students. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2008, 24, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dusza, S.W.; Halpern, A.C.; Satagopan, J.M.; Oliveria, S.A.; Weinstock, M.A.; Scope, A.; Berwick, M.; Geller, A.C. Prospective study of sunburn and sun behavior patterns during adolescence. Pediatrics 2012, 129, 309–317. [Google Scholar]
  10. Buller, D.B.; Cokkinides, V.; Hall, H.I.; Hartman, A.M.; Saraiya, M.; Miller, E.; Paddock, L.; Glanz, K. Prevalence of sunburn, sun protection, and indoor tanning behaviors among Americans: Review from national surveys and case studies of 3 states. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2011, 65, S114–S123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bandi, P.; Cokkinides, V.E.; Weinstock, M.A.; Ward, E. Sunburns, sun protection and indoor tanning behaviors, and attitudes regarding sun protection benefits and tan appeal among parents of U.S. adolescents1998 compared to 2004. 2010, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dobbinson, S.; Wakefield, M.; Hill, D.; Girgis, A.; Aitken, J.F.; Beckmann, K.; Reeder, A.I.; Herd, N.; Fairthorne, A.; Bowles, K.A. Prevalence and determinants of australian adolescents’ and adults’ weekend sun protection and sunburn, summer 2003-2004. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2008, 59, 602–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hall, H.I.; Saraiya, M.; Thompson, T.; Hartman, A.; Glanz, K.; Rimer, B. Correlates of sunburn experiences among U.S. adults: Results of the 2000 national health interview survey. 2003, 540–549. [Google Scholar]
  14. Branstrom, R.; Chang, Y.M.; Kasparian, N.; Affleck, P.; Tibben, A.; Aspinwall, L.G.; Azizi, E.; Baron-Epel, O.; Battistuzzi, L.; Bruno, W.; et al. Melanoma risk factors, perceived threat and intentional tanning: An international online survey. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2010, 19, 216–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bränström, R.; Ullen, H.; Brandberg, Y. Attitudes, subjective norms and perception of behavioural control as predictors of sun-related behaviour in Swedish adults. Prev. Med. 2004, 39, 992–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Geller, A.C.; Colditz, G.; Oliveria, S.; Emmons, K.; Jorgensen, C.; Aweh, G.N.; Frazier, A.L. Use of sunscreen, sunburning rates, and tanning bed use among more than 10,000 US children and adolescents. Pediatrics 2002, 109, 1009–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hall, D.M.; McCarty, F.; Elliott, T.; Glanz, K. Lifeguards’ sun protection habits and sunburns: Association with sun-safe environments and skin cancer prevention program participation. Arch. Dermatol. 2009, 145, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Cokkinides, V.; Weinstock, M.; Glanz, K.; Albano, J.; Ward, E.; Thun, M. Trends in sunburns, sun protection practices, and attitudes toward sun exposure protection and tanning among US adolescents, 1998-2004. Pediatrics 2006, 118, 853–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stapleton, J.L.; Hillhouse, J.; Turrisi, R.; Robinson, J.K.; Baker, K.; Manne, S.L.; Coups, E.J. Erythema and Ultraviolet Indoor Tanning: Findings from a Diary Study. In Proceeding of 33rd Annual Meeting of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA, 11–14 April 2012; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Rosenstock, I. The Health Belief Model: Explaining Health Behavior through Expectancies. In Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice; Glanz, K., Lewis, F., Rimer, B., Eds.; Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  21. Cafri, G.; Thompson, J.K.; Jacobsen, P.B.; Hillhouse, J. Investigating the role of appearance-based factors in predicting sunbathing and tanning salon use. J. Behav. Med. 2009, 32, 532–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jackson, K.M.; Aiken, L.S. A psychosocial model of sun protection and sunbathing in young women: The impact of health beliefs, attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy for sun protection. Health Psychol. 2000, 19, 469–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Carmel, S.; Shani, E.; Rosenberg, L. The role of age and an expanded health belief model in predicting skin cancer protective behavior. Health Educ. Res. 1994, 9, 433–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fitzpatrick, T.B. The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch. Dermatol. 1988, 124, 869–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Glanz, K.; Yaroch, A.L.; Dancel, M.; Saraiya, M.; Crane, L.A.; Buller, D.B.; Manne, S.; O’Riordan, D.L.; Heckman, C.J.; Hay, J.; et al. Measures of sun exposure and sun protection practices for behavioral and epidemiologic research. Arch. Dermatol. 2008, 144, 217–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Aiken, L.S.; West, S.G.; Woodward, C.K.; Reno, R.R. Health beliefs and compliance with mammography-screening recommendations in asymptomatic women. Health Psychol. 1994, 13, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ford, J.S.; Ostroff, J.S.; Hay, J.L.; Buckley, T.R.; Stein, T.R.; Berwick, M.; Primavera, L.H.; Shike, M. Participation in annual skin cancer screening among women seeking routine mammography. Prev. Med. 2004, 38, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gibbons, F.X.; Gerrard, M.; Lane, D.J.; Mahler, H.I.; Kulik, J.A. Using UV photography to reduce use of tanning booths: A test of cognitive mediation. Health Psychol. 2005, 24, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mahler, H.I.; Kulik, J.A.; Gibbons, F.X.; Gerrard, M.; Harrell, J. Effects of appearance-based interventions on sun protection intentions and self-reported behaviors. Health Psychol. 2003, 22, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weinstock, M.A.; Rossi, J.S.; Redding, C.A.; Maddock, J.E. Randomized controlled community trial of the efficacy of a multicomponent stage-matched intervention to increase sun protection among beachgoers. Prev. Med. 2002, 35, 584–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hillhouse, J.J.; Turrisi, R.; Kastner, M. Modeling tanning salon behavioral tendencies using appearance motivation, self-monitoring and the theory of planned behavior. Health Educ. Res. 2000, 15, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mahler, H.I.; Kulik, J.A.; Harrell, J.; Correa, A.; Gibbons, F.X.; Gerrard, M. Effects of UV photographs, photoaging information, and use of sunless tanning lotion on sun protection behaviors. Arch. Dermatol. 2005, 141, 373–380. [Google Scholar]
  33. Warthan, M.M.; Uchida, T.; Wagner, R.F., Jr. UV light tanning as a type of substance-related disorder. Arch. Dermatol. 2005, 141, 963–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Daniel, L.C.; Heckman, C.J.; Kloss, J.D.; Manne, S.L. Comparing alternative methods of measuring skin color and damage. Cancer Causes Control 2009, 20, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Skin Cancer Foundation. Women and Melanoma: It’s Getting Scarier. Available online: http://www.skincancer.org/skin-cancer-information/melanoma/women-and-melanoma-its-getting-scarier (accessed on 12 April 2012).
  36. Potente, S.; Coppa, K.; Williams, A.; Engels, R. Legally brown: Using ethnographic methods to understand sun protection attitudes and behaviours among young Australians ‘I didn’t mean to get burnt—It just happened!’. Health Educ. Res. 2011, 26, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bech-Thomsen, N.; Wulf, H.C. Sunbathers’ application of sunscreen is probably inadequate to obtain the sun protection factor assigned to the preparation. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 1992, 9, 242–244. [Google Scholar]
  38. Diffey, B. Sunscreens: Expectation and realization. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2009, 25, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Neale, R.; Williams, G.; Green, A. Application patterns among participants randomized to daily sunscreen use in a skin cancer prevention trial. Arch. Dermatol. 2002, 138, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ermertcan, A.T.; Ozturkcan, S.; Dinc, G.; Yurtman, D.; Pala, T.; Sahin, M.T. Sunscreen use and sun protection practices in students and personnel of Celal Bayar University. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 2005, 21, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Clarke, V.A.; Williams, T.; Arthey, S. Skin type and optimistic bias in relation to the sun protection and suntanning behaviors of young adults. J. Behav. Med. 1997, 20, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heckman, C.J.; Coups, E.J. Correlates of sunscreen use among high school students: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Jones, B.; Oh, C.; Corkery, E.; Hanley, R.; Egan, C.A. Attitudes and perceptions regarding skin cancer and sun protection behaviour in an Irish population. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2007, 21, 1097–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Buller, D.B.; Buller, M.K.; Beach, B.; Ertl, G. Sunny days, healthy ways: Evaluation of a skin cancer prevention curriculum for elementary school-aged children. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1996, 35, 911–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Robinson, N.G.; White, K.M.; Young, R.M.; Anderson, P.J.; Hyde, M.K.; Greenbank, S.; Keane, J.; Rolfe, T.; Vardon, P.; Baskerville, D. Young people and sun safety: The role of attitudes, norms and control factors. Health Promot. J. Aust. 2008, 19, 45–51. [Google Scholar]
  46. Glanz, K.; Schoenfeld, E.R.; Steffen, A. A randomized trial of tailored skin cancer prevention messages for adults: Project scape. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100, 735–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lapsley, D.K.; Hill, P.L. Subjective invulnerability, optimism bias and adjustment in emerging adulthood. J. Youth Adolesc. 2010, 39, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Prinstein, M.J.; Dodge, K.A. Understanding Peer Influence in Children and Adolescents; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Heckman, C.J.; Darlow, S.; Cohen-Filipic, J.; Kloss, J.D.; Manne, S.L.; Munshi, T.; Perlis, C.S. Psychosocial Correlates of Sunburn among Young Adult Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2241-2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062241

AMA Style

Heckman CJ, Darlow S, Cohen-Filipic J, Kloss JD, Manne SL, Munshi T, Perlis CS. Psychosocial Correlates of Sunburn among Young Adult Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012; 9(6):2241-2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Heckman, Carolyn J., Susan Darlow, Jessye Cohen-Filipic, Jacqueline D. Kloss, Sharon L. Manne, Teja Munshi, and Clifford S. Perlis. 2012. "Psychosocial Correlates of Sunburn among Young Adult Women" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 6: 2241-2251. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062241

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop