Next Article in Journal
Effects of Educating Local Government Officers and Healthcare and Welfare Professionals in Suicide Prevention
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Genomic Effects of Xenoestrogen Mixtures
Previous Article in Journal
Short and Long Term Variation in Ultraviolet Radiation and Multiple Sclerosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Biomarker Genes for Detecting Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disruptors via Estrogen Receptors

Laboratory of Veterinary Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9(3), 698-711; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9030698
Submission received: 26 December 2011 / Revised: 2 February 2012 / Accepted: 20 February 2012 / Published: 24 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endocrine Disruptors and Human Health)

Abstract

:
Endocrine disruptors (EDs) are compounds used in various industrial products, drugs, and cosmetics. They can be found in the environment and disturb the endocrine and reproductive systems, resulting in adverse effects to humans and wildlife such as birth defects and developmental disorders. Since several EDs have a structure similar to that of endogenous steroid hormones such as estrogens, they intend to have an affinity for steroid hormone receptors and alter hormone-mediated metabolism by binding to these receptors. EDs are therefore a global concern and assays should be developed to efficiently determine whether these compounds are detrimental to biological systems. Diverse experimental methods may help determine the endocrine disrupting potential of EDs and evaluate the adverse effects of a single and/or combination of these reagents. Currently, biomarkers have been employed to objectively measure EDs potency and understand the underlying mechanisms. Further studies are required to develop ideal screening methods and biomarkers to determine EDs potency at environmentally relevant concentrations. In this review, we describe the biomarkers for estrogenicity of EDs identified both in vitro and in vivo, and introduce a biomarker, cabindin-D9k (CaBP-9k), that may be used to assess estrogenic activity of EDs.

1. Introduction

Endocrine disruptors (EDs) are environmental chemicals that disrupt the endocrine system of wildlife and humans. Studies performed in the 1930s showed that a number of synthetic chemicals have estrogenic properties, and the feminizing effect of the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) was demonstrated in roosters in the 1950s [1,2]. Hormonally active chemicals, (i.e., diethylstilbestrol or DES) were widely used to prevent abortions until 1971; however, vaginal clear cell carcinogenesis was observed in young women due to use of synthetic estrogen during pregnancy [3]. Furthermore, female offspring from women who were exposed to DES had an increased risk of reproductive and immunologic abnormalities, and male offspring were at risk for genital anomalies and abnormal spermatogenesis [4,5]. It was also reported that EDs potentially cause fetal pathophysiology, abnormal maturation of the brain, learning disabilities, disorders associated with attention, motivation, emotion and cognitive development. In addition, reduction of sperm count and prostate enlargement in males; ovarian and uterine dysfunctions in females have been reported [6,7]. These findings indicate that hormonal disruption caused by EDs in animals and humans results in serious adverse effects.
EDs are widely found in drugs, pesticides, and compounds used for manufacturing plastics (see Table 1). Most EDs have a structure similar to that of endogenous steroid hormones and primarily act through nuclear hormone receptors including estrogen receptors (ERs), androgen receptors (ARs), and thyroid receptors (TRs) [8]. Having a structure similar to that of hormones permits EDs to exert abnormal effects that disrupt endocrine systems through diverse pathways including binding to hormone receptors, mimicking hormone action, and blocking the action of hormones [9,10,11]. Estrogen (E2) is hormone essential for the development of reproductive organs, bone, liver, and the cardiovascular system, and plays an important role in many physiological processes [12]. Diverse types of EDs have been shown to have estrogenic activity because of high binding affinity for ERs. ERs are steroid hormone nuclear receptors and act as ligand-activated transcription factors. ERs have two isoforms, ER-α and ER-β, which can bind a wide variety of EDs and activate the transcription of estrogen-responsive genes [13,14]. However, there are no standard methods to determine whether certain EDs have an estrogenic activity or not. In this review, we discuss diverse methods to evaluate EDs and discuss the use of CaBP-9k as a biomarker for identifying estrogenic EDs.
Table 1. List of estrogenic EDs.
Table 1. List of estrogenic EDs.
Chemical ClassEDsReferences
Industrial byproductsPolychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
Polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs)
Dioxins[15,16]
PlasticsBisphenol A (BPA)[17,18]
PlasticizersPhthalates[19,20]
PesticidesMethoxychlor
Chlorpyrifos
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane[21,22]
FungicidesVinclozolin[23,24]
Pharmaceutical agentsDES[3,5]
Biodegradation productsOctyl-phenol (OP)
Nonylphenol (NP)[25,26]
PhytoestrogensGenistein
Coumestrol[24,27,28]

2. Biomarkers for Measuring the Estrogenic Effect of EDs

2.1. Vitellogenin

Vitellogenin (VTG) is an egg yolk precursor protein and is normally produced by liver cells of female fish in response to E2 secreted by the pituitary gland [29]. It is released into the blood where it circulates until it reached the ovaries and promotes oocyte development. Male fish also carry the VTG gene, although VTG protein is normally not expressed because the circulation levels of E2 are extremely low in male blood plasma [30]. However, males still have the capability to express VTG, and male fish are known to produce the protein under the influence of estrogenic EDs [30,31,32]. E2, NP, and OP all induce the expression of VTG in male fish in a dose-dependent manner [33,34], suggesting that the VTG gene in male fish can be used as a biomarker for evaluating the effects of EDs [35,36,37].

2.2. Complement C3 and Ornithine Decarboxylase

The uterus is a general target organ for estrogen-mediated metabolism. A uterotrophic bioassay is widely used to measure increased uterine wet weight after EDs treatment [38]. However, this assay does not evaluate effects other than those associated with the estrogenic activity of EDs which could lead increased uterine weight via unknown pathways. In the past few years, several genes regulated in the uterus have been identified and used as marker genes to assess the estrogenicity of EDs. For example, genes for the gap junction connexin, such as connexin 26 and connexin 43, the plasma glycoprotein clusterin, and complement C3 were shown to be highly regulated by E2 in rat endometrium [39,40,41].
Complement C3, simply called C3, is a protein involved in the immune system which plays a central role in activating complement pathways and promotes innate immunity [42]. In adult female mice, C3 is exclusively expressed in the uterus. E2 administration to immature or ovariectomized mice significantly increases C3 mRNA levels as well as immunoreactivity in the endometrium, indicating that the synthesis of this protein is regulated by E2 in mouse endometrium [43]. Phyto- and xenogestogens have been found to induce C3 expression in endometrium, and the sensitive parameter of C3 is highly suited to investigate the biological potential of natural and synthetic estrogens [39].
The enzyme ornithine decarboxylase catalyzes the decarboxylation of ornithine (a product of the urea cycle) to form putrescine, which is the committed step in polyamine synthesis [44]. The rapid growth and differentiation of uterus are concomitant with increased expression of the ornithine decarboxylase gene. Recent studies have shown that expression of ornithine decarboxylase gene in the uterus is augmented by EDs [45,46,47,48]. These estrogen-sensitive genes have therefore been used as markers for evaluating the estrogenic potential of EDs in the uterus

2.3. pS2 and Mucin 1

pS2 is a low molecular weight protein containing 60 amino acid. E2 and estrogenic compounds stimulate the expression of pS2 which was first observed in the MCF-7 breast cancer cell line into which the pS2 gene has been cloned [49]. pS2 mRNA production can be rapidly induced by E2 in certain breast cancers, but not in normal breast tissue nor in any other human cell lines. Therefore, pS2 mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells is an ideal model for studying the effects of estrogenic compounds [49,50,51].
Cell surface mucins are a family of highly glycosylated glycoproteins found in the apical cell membranes of epithelial cells from the mammary gland, salivary gland, respiratory tract, digestive tract, uterus, and testis [52,53]. Mucin1 (MUC1), a mucin and well-known marker of breast cancer, is an extended rod-like molecule which protrudes above the cell surface of epithelial cells [54]. The MUC1 promoter region has half of an estrogen response element (ERE) and is regulated by E2. Therefore, MUC1 is known to be a direct E2 target gene due to specific ER binding in MCF-7 cells [55]. EDs, including NP, have been reported to induce the expression of pS2 and MUC1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells [54].

2.4. Progesterone Receptor

The progesterone receptor (PR) is an intracellular steroid receptor that specifically binds to progesterone and is involved in a wide variety of physiological functions including the control of embryonic development, cell differentiation, and homeostasis [56,57,58]. The PR gene is a known target of E2 in certain cell lines including MCF-7 and GH3 cells that express ERs [59,60]. Recent studies have observed EDs-induced expression of PRs in GH3 rat pituitary cells. Several parabens and E2 significantly increased PR expression in these cells [60], demonstrating that PR levels may be augmented by EDs through an ER-mediated pathway in GH3 cells [61,62]. By measuring the expression levels of VTG, Complement C3, ornithine decarboxylase, pS2, MUC1 and PR genes, EDs estrogenicity can be efficiently evaluated in a cost- and time-effective manner.

3. CaBP-9k Gene Expression as a Biomarker for Assessing the Effects of EDs

3.1. Introduction of the CaBP-9k Gene

Calbindin-D9k (CaBP-9k) is a 9-kDa cytosolic protein and a member of the S100 family of calcium-binding proteins that includes calmodulin, paravalbumin, troponin C, and calbindin-D28k. These calcium-binding proteins were recently classified into different sub-families as they differ in the number of calcium-binding EF-hand sites [63,64]. CaBP-9k has two calcium-binding domains that have high affinities for calcium. The CaBP-9k gene is localized on the X chromosome and consists of three exons interrupted by two introns [65,66]. The CaBP-9k protein is composed of 79 amino acids. The C-terminal site (amino acids 54–65) is a normal EF-hand similar to that found in other proteins of the S100 family while the N-terminal site (amino acids 14–27) has a unique structure containing different amino acids. However, N-terminal site have not disrupted the calcium binding ability of CaBP-9k [67].

3.2. Regulation of CaBP-9k Gene Expression

CaBP-9k is an intracellular factor primarily known as a vitamin D-dependent calcium-binding protein found in the cytoplasm of intestinal cells [68,69]. CaBP-9k expression has been reported in intestine, kidneys, bone, lung, placenta, pituitary gland, and uterus [70]. Duodenal and renal CaBP-9k are involved in calcium absorption and re-absorption; its expression is regulated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [71,72]. Duodenal CaBP-9k is mainly expressed in enterocytes of the duodenum in rodents and is involved in intestinal calcium absorption [73]. Additionally, the level of CaBP-9k mRNA is thought to be a marker of small intestine differentiation [74,75]. Renal CaBP-9k plays a role in calcium re-absorption in the kidney, which is important for maintaining calcium homeostasis in the body. Ionized and calcium enters the glomerular filtrate by convection and is re-absorbed by the renal tubules [72]. Renal CaBP-9k is expressed at the site of calcium re-absorption and localized in the distal convoluted tubules in rodents [76,77].
The regulation of CaBP-9k expression in other tissues other than duodenum and kidney is known to be accomplished through different mechanisms. For instance, uterine CaBP-9k is not under the control of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 despite the presence of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors [78]. Uterine CaBP-9k is expressed mainly in the endometrial stroma and myometrium in non-pregnant rodents and regulated by sex steroid hormones [79,80]. An estrogen response element (ERE) in the CaBP-9k promoter mediates transcriptional regulation of CaBP-9k in the presence of E2 in rat uterus [81]. On the other hand, a progesterone response element (PRE) in the CaBP-9k promoter is responsible for responsiveness to progesterone (P4) in mouse uterus [82]. Interestingly, uterine CaBP-9k is up-regulated by E2 and down-regulated by P4 during the estrous cycle in rat uterus [83,84], while it has been shown to be decreased by E2 in mouse uterus [85,86,87].

3.3. In Vivo Evaluation of Estrogenic Activity of EDs Using the CaBP-9k Gene

Recently, CaBP-9k was suggested to be a novel biomarker for evaluating EDs activity [88,89]. CaBP-9k expression levels increased by exposure to EDs are considered to be effective tools for screening estrogenic compounds in in vivo models. Recent studies demonstrated that estrogenic compounds significantly increase the expression of uterine CaBP-9k in rats [78]. An et al. showed that E2, OP, NP, and BPA increased uterine CaBP-9k gene expression in rats. Furthermore, these estrogenic compounds also significantly increase uterine weight in rats [84,89]. Estrogenic compounds, which form a class of EDs that includes diethylstilbestrol [90], tetrabromodiphenyl ether [91], phthalates [92] genistein [93], and parabens [94], strongly induce uterine CaBP-9k mRNA and protein expression in the uterus of rats. Moreover, the ER antagonist ICI 182,780 prevents increased expression of uterine CaBP-9k when co-administered with estrogenic compounds. It has been confirmed that ER-mediated signaling is involved in the induction of CaBP-9k gene expression by estrogenic compounds [95]. These findings suggest that the CaBP-9k gene is a useful biomarker gene for assessing the estrogenic potential of EDs.
The ability of CaBP-9k for evaluating EDs in an in vivo system is summarized in Table 2. Triclosan, tetrabromodiphenyl ether 47 (BDE47), and genistein at concentrations less than 50 mg/kg have been found to have regulatory effects on uterine CaBP-9k expression [91,93]. Triclosan at a dose of 37.5 mg/kg up-regulates uterine CaBP-9k expression in an immature rat model [96]. Genistein has similar potential with triclosan at dose of 40 mg/kg. Treatment with BDE47 (50 mg/kg) led a significant increase in uterine CaBP-9k as determined by RT-PCR. OP, NP, and BPA (600 mg/kg) induce uterine CaBP-9k expression at in the rat; however, lower concentrations (100 to 250 mg/kg) of these compounds had a more prominent effect in mice [84]. Methoxychlor (250 mg/kg) was reported to have a moderate effect on CaBP-9k expression in rat uterus [97]. Butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP), 2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP), and diethyl phthalate (DEP) do not have any significant estrogenic effects on CaBP-9k gene expression in rat uterus [92]. Changes in CaBP-9k expression for assessing EDs activity are sufficient when compared to other biomarkers. For example, C3, a well-known biomarker for measuring EDs effects, shows a level of sensitivity similar to that of CaBP-9k at a concentration in the presence of OP and BPA (200 mg/kg) [40].
Table 2. Expression of uterine CaBP-9k in in vivo system by different EDs concentrations.
Table 2. Expression of uterine CaBP-9k in in vivo system by different EDs concentrations.
Endocrine disruptorsDoses (mg/kg)AnimalRouteMethodReference
Triclosan37.5ratOralq-PCR/western[96]
Genistein40ratS.C injectionWestern[93]
Tetrabromodiphenyl ether 4750ratS.C injectionRT-PCR[91]
Octyl phenol100/600mouse/ratS.C injectionWestern[84]
Methoxychlor200ratOralNorthern[97]
Nonyl phenol250/600mouse/ratS.C injectionWestern[84]
Bisphenol A250/600mouse/ratS.C injectionWestern[84]

3.4. In Vitro Evaluation of Estrogenic Activity of EDs Using the CaBP-9k Gene

In 2004, Fujimoto et al. identified estrogen-responsive genes in the rat pituitary GH3 cell line [98]. GH3 cells were initially characterized as ones that can synthesize growth hormone and prolactin (PRL) in response to E2 stimulation [99]. It was suggested that the GH3 cell line is a good candidate for assessing the in vitro estrogenicity of EDs since it is E2-sensitive and expresses functional ERs [98]. Recent studies have reported that EDs induce CaBP-9k expression in this cell line. OP, NP, and BPA induce a significant increase in CaBP-9k expression in GH3 cells in addition to augmenting growth hormone and PRL production and gene expression [100]. Moreover, activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs), protein kinases B (Akt), or G proteins by OP, NP and BPA has been observed in these cells [99,100]. Significant induction in CaBP-9k and PR gene expression was also observed after treatment with various concentrations of parabens [61]. In this study, the effects of parabens on the regulation of CaBP-9k expression were blocked in the presence of ICI 182,780, indicating that CaBP-9k is induced by EDs via the ER pathway in GH3 cell line.
Evaluation of the CaBP-9k gene as a biomarker for EDs activity in in vitro systems is summarized in Table 3. OP, isobutyl phenol, and ethyl- and isobutyl parabens produce the strongest induction of CaBP-9k expression at a concentration of 0.1 μM in GH3 cells, while NP and isopropyl- and butyl-parabens increase CaBP-9k gene expression at a concentration of 1 μM [100]. The concentration of BPA and methyl-and propyl-parabens required for inducing CaBP-9k gene expression is 10 μM [61]. The efficiency of CaBP-9k gene for EDs effect was sensitive than other genes, since pS2, ER and MUC1 were induced at 10 μM of NP in human breast MCF-7 cells, although the cell lines and other experimental conditions were different [54].
Table 3. Expression of CaBP-9k on in vitro system under different EDs concentration.
Table 3. Expression of CaBP-9k on in vitro system under different EDs concentration.
Endocrine disruptorsMinimum concentration (μM)MethodReference
Octyl phenol0.1q-PCR[62]
Ethyl paraben0.1q-PCR[101]
Isobutyl paraben0.1q-PCR[101]
Nonyl phenol1RT-PCR[100]
Isopropyl paraben1q-PCR[101]
Butyl paraben1q-PCR[101]
Bisphenol A10RT-PCR[100]
Methyl paraben10q-PCR[101]
Propyl paraben10q-PCR[101]
The sensitivity of the CaBP-9k gene for assessing estrogenic activity of EDs compared to other biomarkers is difficult to define because effect of intermediate concentrations (i.e., OP: 0.01–1 μM) of EDs have not been tested, particularly in in vivo models. However, the CaBP-9k gene has been evaluated as a biomarker for EDs activity by a number of in vivo and in vitro studies as described above. Taken together, data from these studies have demonstrated that the CaBP-9k gene is a sensitive and valuable biomarker for assessing the potential estrogenic activity of EDs.

4. Conclusions

EDs are natural or synthetic chemicals with structures similar to those of endogenous hormones and have been shown to disrupt endocrine, nervous, and reproduction systems in animals and humans. There are growing concerns about health problems associated with exposure to EDs found in the environment. Chemicals that disrupt the endocrine system have been shown to have a high binding affinity to steroid hormone receptors, suggesting that exposure to EDs can seriously impact metabolism, development, reproduction, and behavior in mammals, including humans. Therefore, identification and characterization of EDs is urgent for predicting their detrimental effects. Efficient and accurate assays are required to measure EDs potency and to determine what chemicals can possibility be defined as EDs. However, methods for detecting the adverse effects of EDs are still limited. There are currently no sufficient standard biomarker systems or precise methods for evaluating the effects of EDs. Further research to determine the physiological concentration of various EDs (administered alone or in combination) necessary for disturbing biological systems and exerting adverse effects on human health is required. In this review, we discussed the properties of the CaBP-9k gene and its potential use as a biomarker for EDs activity. However, further studies to examine the accumulated, synergistic, and addictive effect of EDs using this biomarker are needed. In addition, identification of novel biomarkers that can determine the biologically and physiologically relevant concentrations of EDs is necessary.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. PJ008323), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Burlington, H.; Lindeman, V.F. Effect of DDT on testes and secondary sex characters of white leghorn cockerels. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1950, 74, 48–51. [Google Scholar]
  2. Poliakov, A.I.; Kriger, M.S. Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane in the treatment of males with trichomonal urethritis. Vestn. Dermatol. Venerol. 1961, 35, 80. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schrager, S.; Potter, B.E. Diethylstilbestrol exposure. Am. Fam. Physician 2004, 69, 2395–2400. [Google Scholar]
  4. Giusti, R.M.; Iwamoto, K.; Hatch, E.E. Diethylstilbestrol revisited: a review of the long-term health effects. Ann. Intern. Med. 1995, 122, 778–788. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yamamoto, M.; Shirai, M.; Tamura, A.; Kobayashi, T.; Kohara, S.; Murakami, M.; Arishima, K. Effects of maternal exposure to a low dose of diethylstilbestrol on sexual dimorphic nucleus volume and male reproductive system in rat offspring. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 30, 7–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bonde, J.P.; Storgaard, L. How work-place conditions, environmental toxicants and lifestyle affect male reproductive function. Int. J. Androl. 2002, 25, 262–268. [Google Scholar]
  7. Calafat, A.M.; Kuklenyik, Z.; Reidy, J.A.; Caudill, S.P.; Ekong, J.; Needham, L.L. Urinary concentrations of bisphenol a and 4-nonylphenol in a human reference population. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 391–395. [Google Scholar]
  8. Korach, K.S.; Chae, K.; Gibson, M.; Curtis, S. Estrogen receptor stereochemistry: ligand binding and hormonal responsiveness. Steroids 1991, 56, 263–270. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuiper, G.G.; Lemmen, J.G.; Carlsson, B.; Corton, J.C.; Safe, S.H.; van der Saag, P.T.; van der Burg, B.; Gustafsson, J.A. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens with estrogen receptor beta. Endocrinology 1998, 139, 4252–4263. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dickerson, S.M.; Gore, A.C. Estrogenic environmental endocrine-disrupting chemical effects on reproductive neuroendocrine function and dysfunction across the life cycle. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2007, 8, 143–159. [Google Scholar]
  11. DeRosa, C.; Richter, P.; Pohl, H.; Jones, D.E. Environmental exposures that affect the endocrine system: public health implications. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 1998, 1, 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  12. Watanabe, H.; Suzuki, A.; Kobayashi, M.; Takahashi, E.; Itamoto, M.; Lubahn, D.B.; Handa, H.; Iguchi, T. Analysis of temporal changes in the expression of estrogen-regulated genes in the uterus. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2003, 30, 347–358. [Google Scholar]
  13. Revankar, C.M.; Cimino, D.F.; Sklar, L.A.; Arterburn, J.B.; Prossnitz, E.R. A transmembrane intracellular estrogen receptor mediates rapid cell signaling. Science 2005, 307, 1625–1630. [Google Scholar]
  14. Matthews, J.B.; Fertuck, K.C.; Celius, T.; Huang, Y.W.; Fong, C.J.; Zacharewski, T.R. Ability of structurally diverse natural products and synthetic chemicals to induce gene expression mediated by estrogen receptors from various species. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2002, 82, 181–194. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, H.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cai, Z.; Jiang, G. E-waste recycling induced polybrominated diphenyl ethers, polychlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzo-furans pollution in the ambient environment. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 67–72. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wen, S.; Yang, F.; Li, J.G.; Gong, Y.; Zhang, X.L.; Hui, Y.; Wu, Y.N.; Zhao, Y.F.; Xu, Y. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofurans (PCDD/FS), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDES), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS) monitored by tree bark in an e-waste recycling area. Chemosphere 2009, 74, 981–987. [Google Scholar]
  17. Izzotti, A.; Kanitz, S.; D’Agostini, F.; Camoirano, A.; de Flora, S. Formation of adducts by bisphenol A, an endocrine disruptor, in DNA in vitro and in liver and mammary tissue of mice. Mutat. Res. 2009, 679, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Stavrakakis, C.; Hequet, V.; Faur, C.; Andres, Y.; Le Cloirec, P.; Colin, R. Biodegradation of endocrine disrupters: case of 17beta-estradiol and bisphenol a. Environ. Technol. 2008, 29, 269–277. [Google Scholar]
  19. Habert, R.; Muczynski, V.; Lehraiki, A.; Lambrot, R.; Lecureuil, C.; Levacher, C.; Coffigny, H.; Pairault, C.; Moison, D.; Frydman, R.; et al. Adverse effects of endocrine disruptors on the foetal testis development: focus on the phthalates. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2009, 47, S67–S74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heudorf, U.; Mersch-Sundermann, V.; Angerer, J. Phthalates: toxicology and exposure. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2007, 210, 623–634. [Google Scholar]
  21. Han, E.H.; Jeong, T.C.; Jeong, H.G. Methoxychlor suppresses the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-inducible CYP1A1 expression in murine Hepa-1c1c7 cells. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2007, 70, 1304–1309. [Google Scholar]
  22. Keum, Y.S.; Lee, Y.H.; Kim, J.H. Metabolism of methoxychlor by Cunninghamella elegans ATCC36112. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 7931–7937. [Google Scholar]
  23. Schneider, S.; Kaufmann, W.; Buesen, R.; van Ravenzwaay, B. Vinclozolin—the lack of a transgenerational effect after oral maternal exposure during organogenesis. Reprod. Toxicol. 2008, 25, 352–360. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vilela, M.L.; Willingham, E.; Buckley, J.; Liu, B.C.; Agras, K.; Shiroyanagi, Y.; Baskin, L.S. Endocrine disruptors and hypospadias: Role of genistein and the fungicide vinclozolin. Urology 2007, 70, 618–621. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hagiwara, H.; Sugizaki, T.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Senoh, E.; Goto, T.; Ishihara, Y. Effects of alkylphenols on bone metabolism in vivo and in vitro. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 181, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hirose, A.; Koizumi, M.; Hasegawa, R. Bisphenol. Alkylphenols. Nihon Rinsho 2000, 58, 2428–2433. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hancock, K.D.; Coleman, E.S.; Tao, Y.X.; Morrison, E.E.; Braden, T.D.; Kemppainen, B.W.; Akingbemi, B.T. Genistein decreases androgen biosynthesis in rat Leydig cells by interference with luteinizing hormone-dependent signaling. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 184, 169–175. [Google Scholar]
  28. Whitten, P.L.; Patisaul, H.B.; Young, L.J. Neurobehavioral actions of coumestrol and related isoflavonoids in rodents. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2002, 24, 47–54. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cheek, A.O.; Brouwer, T.H.; Carroll, S.; Manning, S.; McLachlan, J.A.; Brouwer, M. Experimental evaluation of vitellogenin as a predictive biomarker for reproductive disruption. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 681–690. [Google Scholar]
  30. Tian, H.; Ru, S.; Wang, Z.; Cai, W.; Wang, W. Estrogenic effects of monocrotophos evaluated by vitellogenin mRNA and protein induction in male goldfish (Carassius auratus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxical. Pharmacol. 2009, 150, 231–236. [Google Scholar]
  31. Ebrahimi, M. Vitellogenin assay by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay as a biomarker of endocrine disruptor chemicals pollution. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2007, 10, 3109–3114. [Google Scholar]
  32. Henry, T.B.; McPherson, J.T.; Rogers, E.D.; Heah, T.P.; Hawkins, S.A.; Layton, A.C.; Sayler, G.S. Changes in the relative expression pattern of multiple vitellogenin genes in adult male and larval zebrafish exposed to exogenous estrogens. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2009, 154, 119–126. [Google Scholar]
  33. Jung, J.H.; Shim, W.J.; Addison, R.F.; Baek, J.M.; Han, C.H. Protein and gene expression of VTG in response to 4-nonylphenol in rockfish (Sebastes schlegeli). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxical. Pharmacol. 2006, 143, 162–170. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rey Vazquez, G.; Meijide, F.J.; Da Cuna, R.H.; Lo Nostro, F.L.; Piazza, Y.G.; Babay, P.A.; Trudeau, V.L.; Maggese, M.C.; Guerrero, G.A. Exposure to waterborne 4-tert-octylphenol induces vitellogenin synthesis and disrupts testis morphology in the South American freshwater fish Cichlasoma dimerus (Teleostei, Perciformes). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxical. Pharmacol. 2009, 150, 298–306. [Google Scholar]
  35. Andersson, C.; Katsiadaki, I.; Lundstedt-Enkel, K.; Orberg, J. Effects of 17alpha-ethynylestradiol on EROD activity, spiggin and vitellogenin in three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Aquat. Toxicol. 2007, 83, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  36. Puinean, A.M.; Rotchell, J.M. Vitellogenin gene expression as a biomarker of endocrine disruption in the invertebrate, Mytilus edulis. Mar. Environ. Res. 2006, 62, S211–S214. [Google Scholar]
  37. Biales, A.D.; Bencic, D.C.; Lazorchak, J.L.; Lattier, D.L. A quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction method for the analysis of vitellogenin transcripts in model and nonmodel fish species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26, 2679–2686. [Google Scholar]
  38. Owens, W.; Koeter, H.B. The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay: An overview. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1527–1529. [Google Scholar]
  39. Heikaus, S.; Winterhager, E.; Traub, O.; Grummer, R. Responsiveness of endometrial genes Connexin26, Connexin43, C3 and clusterin to primary estrogen, selective estrogen receptor modulators, phyto- and xenoestrogens. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2002, 29, 239–249. [Google Scholar]
  40. Diel, P.; Schulz, T.; Smolnikar, K.; Strunck, E.; Vollmer, G.; Michna, H. Ability of xeno- and phytoestrogens to modulate expression of estrogen-sensitive genes in rat uterus: estrogenicity profiles and uterotropic activity. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 73, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hopert, A.C.; Beyer, A.; Frank, K.; Strunck, E.; Wunsche, W.; Vollmer, G. Characterization of estrogenicity of phytoestrogens in an endometrial-derived experimental model. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106, 581–586. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sahu, A.; Lambris, J.D. Structure and biology of complement protein C3, a connecting link between innate and acquired immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2001, 180, 35–48. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, S.H.; Huang, H.L.; Chen, Y.H. Ovarian steroid-regulated synthesis and secretion of complement c3 and factor b in mouse endometrium during the natural estrous cycle and pregnancy period. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 66, 322–332. [Google Scholar]
  44. Babal, P.; Ruchko, M.; Campbell, C.C.; Gilmour, S.P.; Mitchell, J.L.; Olson, J.W.; Gillespie, M.N. Regulation of ornithine decarboxylase activity and polyamine transport by agmatine in rat pulmonary artery endothelial cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2001, 296, 372–377. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dwivedi, A.; Gupta, G.; Keshri, G.; Dhar, J.D. Changes in uterine ornithine decarboxylase activity and steroid receptor levels during decidualization in the rat induced by CDRI-85/287. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1999, 141, 426–430. [Google Scholar]
  46. Teng, C.S.; Teng, C.T. Studies on sex-organ development. Oestrogenic effect on ornithine decarboxylase activity in the differentiating Mullerian ducts and other organs of the chick embryo. Biochem. J. 1978, 176, 143–149. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kogo, H.; Johnson, D.C.; Dey, S.K.; Takeo, S. A comparison of the effects of estradiol and 2- and 4-hydroxyestradiol on uterine ornithine decarboxylase activity in immature rats. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 1993, 61, 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  48. Webster, R.A.; Zaloudek, C.J.; Inman, B.C.; Stewart, P.J. Estrogen-like stimulation of uterine ornithine decarboxylase by cholera toxin. Am. J. Physiol. 1984, 246, E288–E291. [Google Scholar]
  49. Jakowlew, S.B.; Breathnach, R.; Jeltsch, J.M.; Masiakowski, P.; Chambon, P. Sequence of the pS2 mRNA induced by estrogen in the human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984, 12, 2861–2878. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zajchowski, D.A.; Sager, R. Induction of estrogen-regulated genes differs in immortal and tumorigenic human mammary epithelial cells expressing a recombinant estrogen receptor. Mol. Endocrinol. 1991, 5, 1613–1623. [Google Scholar]
  51. Vivacqua, A.; Recchia, A.G.; Fasanella, G.; Gabriele, S.; Carpino, A.; Rago, V.; Di Gioia, M.L.; Leggio, A.; Bonofiglio, D.; Liguori, A.; et al. The food contaminants bisphenol a and 4-nonylphenol act as agonists for estrogen receptor alpha in MCF7 breast cancer cells. Endocrine 2003, 22, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hewetson, A.; Chilton, B.S. Molecular cloning and hormone-dependent expression of rabbit MUC1 in the cervix and uterus. Biol. Reprod. 1997, 57, 468–477. [Google Scholar]
  53. Spencer, T.E.; Bartol, F.F.; Bazer, F.W.; Johnson, G.A.; Joyce, M.M. Identification and characterization of glycosylation-dependent cell adhesion molecule 1-like protein expression in the ovine uterus. Biol. Reprod. 1999, 60, 241–250. [Google Scholar]
  54. Ren, L.; Marquardt, M.A.; Lech, J.J. Estrogenic effects of nonylphenol on pS2, ER and MUC1 gene expression in human breast cancer cells-MCF-7. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1997, 104, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  55. Gao, P.; Zhou, G.Y.; Guo, L.L.; Zhang, Q.H.; Zhen, J.H.; Fang, A.J.; Lin, X.Y. Reversal of drug resistance in breast carcinoma cells by anti-mdr1 ribozyme regulated by the tumor-specific MUC-1 promoter. Cancer Lett. 2007, 256, 81–89. [Google Scholar]
  56. Bagchi, I.C.; Cheon, Y.P.; Li, Q.; Bagchi, M.K. Progesterone receptor-regulated gene networks in implantation. Front. Biosci. 2003, 8, S852–S861. [Google Scholar]
  57. Beyer, C.; Damm, N.; Brito, V.; Kuppers, E. Developmental expression of progesterone receptor isoforms in the mouse midbrain. Neuroreport 2002, 13, 877–880. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sauter, C.N.; McDermid, R.L.; Weinberg, A.L.; Greco, T.L.; Xu, X.; Murdoch, F.E.; Fritsch, M.K. Differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells induces progesterone receptor gene expression. Exp. Cell Res. 2005, 311, 251–264. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lee, Y.J.; Gorski, J. Estrogen-induced transcription of the progesterone receptor gene does not parallel estrogen receptor occupancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 15180–15184. [Google Scholar]
  60. Harper, N.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Safe, S. Inhibition of estrogen-induced progesterone receptor in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells by aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor agonists. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1994, 104, 47–55. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vo, T.T.; Jung, E.M.; Choi, K.C.; Yu, F.H.; Jeung, E.B. Estrogen receptor alpha is involved in the induction of Calbindin-D9k and progesterone receptor by parabens in GH3 cells: A biomarker gene for screening xenoestrogens. Steroids 2011, 76, 675–681. [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim, Y.R.; Jung, E.M.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Synergistic effects of octylphenol and isobutyl paraben on the expression of calbindin-D9k in GH3 rat pituitary cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2011, 29, 294–302. [Google Scholar]
  63. Schafer, B.W.; Heizmann, C.W. The s100 family of ef-hand calcium-binding proteins: Functions and pathology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996, 21, 134–140. [Google Scholar]
  64. Santamaria-Kisiel, L.; Rintala-Dempsey, A.C.; Shaw, G.S. Calcium-dependent and -independent interactions of the s100 protein family. Biochem. J. 2006, 396, 201–214. [Google Scholar]
  65. Jeung, E.B.; Krisinger, J.; Dann, J.L.; Leung, P.C. Molecular cloning of the full-length cDNA encoding the human calbindin-D9k. FEBS Lett. 1992, 307, 224–228. [Google Scholar]
  66. Jeung, E.B.; Leung, P.C.; Krisinger, J. The human calbindin-D9k gene. Complete structure and implications on steroid hormone regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 235, 1231–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Johansson, C.; Brodin, P.; Grundstrom, T.; Forsen, S.; Drakenberg, T. Mutation of the pseudo-EF-hand of calbindin-D9k into a normal EF-hand. Biophysical studies. Eur. J. Biochem. 1991, 202, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. The biomarker and endocrine disruptors in mammals. J. Reprod. Dev. 2003, 49, 337–345. [Google Scholar]
  69. Christakos, S.; Gabrielides, C.; Rhoten, W.B. Vitamin D-dependent calcium binding proteins: Chemistry, distribution, functional considerations, and molecular biology. Endocr. Rev. 1989, 10, 3–26. [Google Scholar]
  70. Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Molecular mechanism of regulation of the calcium-binding protein calbindin-d9k, and its physiological role(s) in mammals: A review of current research. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008, 12, 409–420. [Google Scholar]
  71. Darwish, H.M.; DeLuca, H.F. Identification of a 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-response element in the 5'-flanking region of the rat calbindin-D9k gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 603–607. [Google Scholar]
  72. Mensenkamp, A.R.; Hoenderop, J.G.; Bindels, R.J. Recent advances in renal tubular calcium reabsorption. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2006, 15, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shamley, D.R.; Opperman, L.A.; Buffenstein, R.; Ross, F.P. Ontogeny of calbindin-D28k and calbindin-D9k in the mouse kidney, duodenum, cerebellum and placenta. Development 1992, 116, 491–496. [Google Scholar]
  74. Colnot, S.; Romagnolo, B.; Lambert, M.; Cluzeaud, F.; Porteu, A.; Vandewalle, A.; Thomasset, M.; Kahn, A.; Perret, C. Intestinal expression of the calbindin-d9k gene in transgenic mice. Requirement for a CDx2-binding site in a distal activator region. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 31939–31946. [Google Scholar]
  75. Barley, N.F.; Prathalingam, S.R.; Zhi, P.; Legon, S.; Howard, A.; Walters, J.R. Factors involved in the duodenal expression of the human calbindin-D9k gene. Biochem. J. 1999, 341, 491–500. [Google Scholar]
  76. Peng, J.B.; Chen, X.Z.; Berger, U.V.; Vassilev, P.M.; Brown, E.M.; Hediger, M.A. A rat kidney-specific calcium transporter in the distal nephron. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 28186–28194. [Google Scholar]
  77. Lee, G.S.; Jung, E.M.; Choi, K.C.; Oh, G.T.; Jeung, E.B. Compensatory induction of the TRPV6 channel in a calbindin-D9k knockout mouse: Its regulation by 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D3. J. Cell. Biochem. 2009, 108, 1175–1183. [Google Scholar]
  78. Krisinger, J.; Dann, J.L.; Applegarth, O.; Currie, W.D.; Jeung, E.B.; Staun, M.; Leung, P.C. Calbindin-D9k gene expression during the perinatal period in the rat: Correlation to estrogen receptor expression in uterus. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1993, 97, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  79. Krisinger, J.; Dann, J.L.; Currie, W.D.; Jeung, E.B.; Leung, P.C. Calbindin-D9k mRNA is tightly regulated during the estrous cycle in the rat uterus. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1992, 86, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
  80. L'Horset, F.; Blin, C.; Colnot, S.; Lambert, M.; Thomasset, M.; Perret, C. Calbindin-D9k gene expression in the uterus: Study of the two messenger ribonucleic acid species and analysis of an imperfect estrogen-responsive element. Endocrinology 1994, 134, 11–18. [Google Scholar]
  81. Darwish, H.; Krisinger, J.; Furlow, J.D.; Smith, C.; Murdoch, F.E.; DeLuca, H.F. An estrogen-responsive element mediates the transcriptional regulation of calbindin-D9k gene in rat uterus. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 551–558. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lee, K.Y.; Oh, G.T.; Kang, J.H.; Shin, S.M.; Heo, B.E.; Yun, Y.W.; Paik, S.G.; Krisinger, J.; Leung, P.C.; Jeung, E.B. Transcriptional regulation of the mouse calbindin-D9k gene by the ovarian sex hormone. Mol. Cells 2003, 16, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hong, E.J.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Induction of calbindin-D9k messenger RNA and protein by maternal exposure to alkylphenols during late pregnancy in maternal and neonatal uteri of rats. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 71, 669–675. [Google Scholar]
  84. Dang, V.H.; Choi, K.C.; Hyun, S.H.; Jeung, E.B. Induction of uterine calbindin-D9k through an estrogen receptor-dependent pathway following single injection with xenobiotic agents in immature rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2007, 70, 171–182. [Google Scholar]
  85. Tatsumi, K.; Higuchi, T.; Fujiwara, H.; Nakayama, T.; Itoh, K.; Mori, T.; Fujii, S.; Fujita, J. Expression of calcium binding protein D9k messenger RNA in the mouse uterine endometrium during implantation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 5, 153–161. [Google Scholar]
  86. Nie, G.Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Minoura, H.; Findlay, J.K.; Salamonsen, L.A. Complex regulation of calcium-binding protein D9k (calbindin-D9k) in the mouse uterus during early pregnancy and at the site of embryo implantation. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 27–36. [Google Scholar]
  87. An, B.S.; Choi, K.C.; Kang, S.K.; Lee, G.S.; Hong, E.J.; Hwang, W.S.; Jeung, E.B. Mouse calbindin-D9k gene expression in the uterus during late pregnancy and lactation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2003, 205, 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  88. An, B.S.; Choi, K.C.; Kang, S.K.; Hwang, W.S.; Jeung, E.B. Novel calbindin-D9k protein as a useful biomarker for environmental estrogenic compounds in the uterus of immature rats. Reprod. Toxicol. 2003, 17, 311–319. [Google Scholar]
  89. An, B.S.; Kang, S.K.; Shin, J.H.; Jeung, E.B. Stimulation of calbindin-D9k mRNA expression in the rat uterus by octyl-phenol, nonylphenol and bisphenol. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 191, 177–186. [Google Scholar]
  90. Dang, V.H.; Choi, K.C.; Hyun, S.H.; Jeung, E.B. Analysis of gene expression profiles in the offspring of rats following maternal exposure to xenoestrogens. Reprod. Toxicol. 2007, 23, 42–54. [Google Scholar]
  91. Dang, V.H.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Tetrabromodiphenyl ether (BDE 47) evokes estrogenicity and calbindin-D9k expression through an estrogen receptor-mediated pathway in the uterus of immature rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 97, 504–511. [Google Scholar]
  92. Hong, E.J.; Ji, Y.K.; Choi, K.C.; Manabe, N.; Jeung, E.B. Conflict of estrogenic activity by various phthalates between in vitro and in vivo models related to the expression of calbindin-D9k. J. Reprod. Dev. 2005, 51, 253–263. [Google Scholar]
  93. Lee, G.S.; Choi, K.C.; Kim, H.J.; Jeung, E.B. Effect of genistein as a selective estrogen receptor beta agonist on the expression of calbindin-d9k in the uterus of immature rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2004, 82, 451–457. [Google Scholar]
  94. Vo, T.T.; Jeung, E.B. An evaluation of estrogenic activity of parabens using uterine calbindin-D9k gene in an immature rat model. Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 112, 68–77. [Google Scholar]
  95. Lee, G.S.; Kim, H.J.; Jung, Y.W.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Estrogen receptor alpha pathway is involved in the regulation of calbindin-D9k in the uterus of immature rats. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 84, 270–277. [Google Scholar]
  96. Jung, E.M.; An, B.S.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Potential estrogenic activity of triclosan in the uterus of immature rats and rat pituitary GH3 cells. Toxicol. Lett. 2012, 208, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
  97. Shin, J.H.; Moon, H.J.; Kang, I.H.; Kim, T.S.; Lee, S.J.; Oh, J.Y.; Lee, Y.J.; Hong, E.J.; Jeung, E.B.; Han, S.Y. Calbindin-D9k mRNA expression in the rat uterus following exposure to methoxychlor: A comparison of oral and subcutaneous exposure. J. Reprod. Dev. 2007, 53, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  98. Fujimoto, N.; Igarashi, K.; Kanno, J.; Inoue, T. Identification of estrogen-responsive genes in the GH3 cell line by cDNA microarray analysis. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 91, 121–129. [Google Scholar]
  99. Dang, V.H.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Estrogen receptors are involved in xenoestrogen induction of growth hormone in the rat pituitary gland. J. Reprod. Dev. 2009, 55, 206–213. [Google Scholar]
  100. Dang, V.H.; Nguyen, T.H.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. A calcium-binding protein, calbindin-D9k, is regulated through an estrogen-receptor mediated mechanism following xenoestrogen exposure in the GH3 cell line. Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 98, 408–415. [Google Scholar]
  101. Yang, H.; Nguyen, T.T.; An, B.S.; Choi, K.C.; Jeung, E.B. Synergistic effects of parabens on the induction of calbindin-D9k gene expression act via a progesterone receptor-mediated pathway in GH3 cells. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, E.-M.; An, B.-S.; Yang, H.; Choi, K.-C.; Jeung, E.-B. Biomarker Genes for Detecting Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disruptors via Estrogen Receptors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 698-711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9030698

AMA Style

Jung E-M, An B-S, Yang H, Choi K-C, Jeung E-B. Biomarker Genes for Detecting Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disruptors via Estrogen Receptors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012; 9(3):698-711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9030698

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jung, Eui-Man, Beum-Soo An, Hyun Yang, Kyung-Chul Choi, and Eui-Bae Jeung. 2012. "Biomarker Genes for Detecting Estrogenic Activity of Endocrine Disruptors via Estrogen Receptors" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 3: 698-711. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9030698

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop