Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Impact of the Plastic BioSand Filter on Health and Drinking Water Quality in Rural Tamale, Ghana
Next Article in Special Issue
Leptospirosis Outbreaks in Nicaragua: Identifying Critical Areas and Exploring Drivers for Evidence-Based Planning
Previous Article in Journal
Valuation of Green Walls and Green Roofs as Soundscape Measures: Including Monetised Amenity Values Together with Noise-attenuation Values in a Cost-benefit Analysis of a Green Wall Affecting Courtyards
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hospital Textiles, Are They a Possible Vehicle for Healthcare-Associated Infections?
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/ijerph9113789
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Investigation into the Effect of Molds in Grasses on Their Content of Low Molecular Mass Thiols

by
Jiri Skladanka
1,*,
Vojtech Adam
2,3,
Ondrej Zitka
2,3,4,
Olga Krystofova
2,
Miroslava Beklova
4,
Rene Kizek
2,3,
Zdenek Havlicek
5,
Petr Slama
5 and
Adam Nawrath
1
1
Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
3
Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Technicka 3058/10, CZ-616 00 Brno, Czech Republic
4
Department of Veterinary Ecology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Palackeho 1–3, CZ-612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
5
Department of Animal Morphology, Physiology and Genetics, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemedelska 1, CZ-613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9(11), 3789-3805; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113789
Submission received: 14 September 2012 / Revised: 16 October 2012 / Accepted: 16 October 2012 / Published: 24 October 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Determinants of Infectious Disease Transmission)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of molds on levels of low molecular mass thiols in grasses. For this purpose, the three grass species Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare and Festulolium braunii were cultivated and sampled during four months, from June to September. The same species were also grown under controlled conditions. High-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection was used for quantification of cysteine, reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, and phytochelatins (PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5). Data were statistically processed and analyzed. Thiols were present in all examined grass species. The effect of fungicide treatments applied under field conditions on the content of the evaluated thiols was shown to be insignificant. Species influenced (p < 0.05) PC3 and GSSG content. F. pabulare, an intergeneric hybrid of drought- and fungi-resistant Festuca arundinacea, was comparable in PC3 content with L. perenne and F. braunii under field conditions. Under controlled conditions, however, F. pabulare had higher (p < 0.05) PC3 content than did L. perenne and F. braunii. Under field conditions, differences between the evaluated species were recorded only in GSSG content, but only sampling in June was significant. F. pabulare had higher (p < 0.05) GSSG content in June than did L. perenne and F. braunii.

1. Introduction

Worldwide, more than 7500 species of grasses are known, but only a minority of these is used as cultivated species in meadows or pasture crops. Individual species differ not only morphologically (by height, manner of tillering, and inflorescence), but also biochemically, as reflected in the organic content (crude protein, fat, and fiber) and inorganic nutrient (P, K, Na, and Mg) levels. Forage grasses are characterized by their high quality for feeding purposes, as demonstrated by low-fiber elements and higher energy content. As a result of these very characteristics, many of these species show lower resistance to pathogens, and especially molds. Grasses are well adapted to periodic defoliation and reproduce not only sexually, but also vegetatively [1,2,3]. Due to this fact, they do not require specific defense mechanisms against herbivores. Nevertheless, alkaloids have been detected in some species, produced in conjunction with endophytic fungi [4]. Therefore, some protective mechanisms must exist, including synthesis of stress-induced molecules.
Glutathione is one of the most significant thiol compounds occurring in both the plant and animal kingdoms. It can be found in all living organisms, from prokaryotic to eukaryotic. Glutathione protects the cytosol and other cellular parts against reactive oxygen radicals (ROS) induced by biotic and abiotic stress. Glutathione occurs in organisms in two forms—as reduced glutathione (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG). These two forms are strictly maintained in a certain ratio, disturbance of which is an indicator of stress elicited by various factors [5,6,7,8]. GSSG originates by formation of a disulfide bond between two GSH molecules, wherein the two H+ atoms formed participate in the ascorbate-glutathione cycle towards eliminating generated ROS. Regressive GSSG molecule regeneration proceeds under GSH catalysis by reduction and oxidation of NADPH + H+ [9,10]. Its concentration varies in plants within a range of 0.1 to 10 mm [11].
The first-ever reference to glutathione is from 1888, when its presence in yeasts was demonstrated. Glutathione’s structure was described as late as 1935. In the 1960s, GSH was studied intensively because of its connection with human body fluids [12,13,14,15]. However, the major contribution to clarifying glutathione metabolism is attributed to Meister [11]. GSH is a tripeptide containing γ-glutamyl-cysteinyl-glycine [16]. In higher plants, GSH plays crucial roles in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis and also participates in detoxification of heavy metals and xenobiotics. In relation to these functions, GSH is also utilized as a signal molecule in cells. GSH/GSSG couple reduction (redox) potential is not only affected by the reciprocal rate of GSH/GSSG but also by changes in GSH synthesis as well as degradation [17,18,19,20,21].
Metallothionein-like proteins can be considered another group of plant protective compounds. These are polypeptides sharing a low molecular mass, high cysteine content with absence of aromatic amino acids and histidine, high metal content, and an abundance of CysXCys sequences, where X is an amino acid other than cysteine [22,23,24,25]. Metallothioneins (MT) are subdivided into three classes based on their structures (Class I: polypeptides with location of cysteine closely related to those in equine renal metallothioneins; Class II: polypeptides with locations of cysteine only distantly related to those in equine renal MT; and Class III: atypical, non-translationally synthesized metal thiolate polypeptides [23]). The family of metallothionein-like proteins with a carboxy-terminal (hereafter “C-terminal”) Gly was characterized for the first time in the yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe exposed to cadmium [26]. Shortly thereafter, similar peptides were found in several plants exposed to various heavy metals. Phytochelatins have a structural relationship to glutathione. Homologues related to homoglutathione were called homophytochelatins and those related to hydroxymethylglutathione were designated as hydroxymethylphytochelatins. Those peptides having a C-terminal amino acid other then Gly are called isophytochelatins with the parenthetic addition of the C-terminal amino acid. The prefix iso- was chosen to signify the peptides based on the common structural element as γ-GluCys. Specific thiols are named according to their sequence of amino acids [27,28,29,30,31,32]. Plants carrying the MT gene also have been prepared as a way of increasing the ability of a plant to withstand metal ions [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of mold on low molecular mass thiols in grasses. For this purpose, the three grass species Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare, and Festulolium braunii were cultivated and sampled during four months, from June to September. High-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection (HPLC-ED) was used for quantification of thiols—cysteine, reduced and oxidized glutathione, and phytochelatins (PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5). The data were statistically processed and analyzed.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Chemicals

Cysteine (CYS), reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione, and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Phytochelatins: (γ-Glu-Cys)2-Gly phytochelatin2 (PC2), (γ-Glu-Cys)3-Gly phytochelatin3 (PC3), (γ-Glu-Cys)4-Gly phytochelatin4 (PC4), and (γ-Glu-Cys)5-Gly phytochelatin5 (PC5) were synthesized at Clonestar Biotech (Brno, Czech Republic) with a purity above 90%. HPLC-grade methanol (>99.9%; v/v) came from Merck (Dortmund, Germany). Other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, unless noted otherwise. Stock standard solutions of the thiols (1 mg/mL) were prepared with ACS water (Sigma-Aldrich) and stored in darkness at −20 °C. Working standard solutions were prepared daily by dilution of the stock solutions. All solutions were filtered through 0.45 μm nylon filter discs (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) prior to analysis using HPLC-ED. The pH was measured using an inoLab WTW Level 3 instrument equipped with a Level 3 probe (inoLab, Weilheim, Germany).

2.2. Plant Material and Cultivation

2.2.1. Description of the Site

A small-plot experiment was conducted at the Research Station of Fodder Crops in Vatin, Czech Republic (49° 31’ N, 15° 58’ E) at an altitude of 560 m a.s.l. The soil type used in the experiment was cambisol as sandy loam on a diluvium of biotic orthogneiss. The mean annual temperature in 2011 was 7.4 °C. The soil nutrient content was composed of 89.1 mg/kg P, 231.6 mg/kg K, and 855 mg/kg Ca, and the pH was 4.76. The plot experiment (field experiment) was carried out under natural conditions of the Czech–Moravian Highlands.

2.2.2. Experimental Plots

Lolium perenne, F. pabulare, and F. braunii were used in the experiment. Grass species (S) was the first experimental factor. A split-plot design was used with plots of 1.5 × 10 m. The experiment was carried out in three independent replications. Evaluation was conducted at the stands in the fourth harvest year. The plots were fertilized with 50 kg/ha N in the spring, while during the experiment the plants were not fertilized. There were three harvest dates (second experimental factor: date of sample, D): 7 June 2011, 1 August 2011, and 23 September 2011. Treatment with the fungicide Amistar (active ingredient azoxystrobin, 250 g l-1) was carried out on 28 June and 13 July. The dose of Amistar was 3 l/ha. Application (Treatment, T) or non-application (without fungicide, control) of fungicide was the third experimental factor.

2.2.3. Control Pot Experiment

The biomass of species evaluated from the field experiment was compared with that of these species grown under controlled conditions in a regime with conditions of 20 °C day (12 h), 10 °C night (12 h), and relative humidity 65%. The studied plant species (S) (L. perenne, F. pabulare, and F. braunii) were grown in vegetative pots of size 530 × 360 × 360 mm. Lawn soil (peat, compost, silica sand, mineral compound fertilizer N, P, K, trace elements, and finely ground dolomitic limestone applied at a rate equivalent to 40 kg/ha) was used as the soil substrate. Biomass sampling was performed 60 d after sowing.

2.2.4. Description of the Species

Lolium perenne is a species susceptible to fungal diseases. This species is demanding of moisture and nutrients. Because of its vulnerability to freezing, stand perseverance in Central Europe is limited to a period of 4–6 years.
Festulolium pabulare, resulting from crossbreeding Festuca arundinacea and Lolium multiflorum, shows higher resistance to fungal diseases. This species has short rhizomes, is resistant to drought, and capable of growing under low temperatures. Leaves dry easily in autumn and are not so susceptible to putrefactive processes. It is a perennial species.
Festulolium braunii results from crossbreeding Festuca pratensis and Lolium multiflorum. This species produces excellent quality forage, but is similar to L. perenne in its susceptibility to fungal diseases, although resistance to Fusarium was increased by crossing with Festuca pratensis. Stand perseverance is limited to five years.

2.3. Description of Fungal Disease Identification and Assessment

Fungi species were identified based upon cultivation on specific media and specific metabolic markers. The infection was assessed on a scale from 1 (highest level of infection) to 9 (plots free of disease). Degree 1 represents very low resistance to fungal diseases (>90% diseased plant leaves per plot), degree 3 low resistance (65–90% diseased plant leaves per plot), degree 5 intermediate resistance (40–65% diseased plant leaves per plot), degree 7 high resistance (15–40% diseased plant leaves per plot), and degree 9 very high resistance (<15% diseased plant leaves per plot). Evaluated on two dates (31 May and 12 July), the levels of pathogen infection in experimental plots ranged on the 9-point scale from 7.3 to 8.0.

2.4. Sample Preparation for Fresh Weight Analysis

The plants were sampled at specific time intervals. Immediately after sampling, the plants were washed three times with distilled water, dried with filter paper, and frozen using liquid nitrogen prior to further experimental procedures. To determine fresh weight, the plants were weighed on Sartorius R160P balances (Sartorius GmbH, Goettingen, Germany) immediately after collection from the filter paper.

2.5. Sample Preparation for Low Molecular Mass Determination

Weighed plant tissues (approximately 0.2 g fresh weight) were transferred to a test tube and prepared according to Supalkova et al. [41]. Liquid nitrogen was then added to the test tube, and the samples were frozen to disrupt the cells. Subsequently, 1 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) was added to the test tube. The mixture was prepared using an ULTRA-TURRAX T8 hand-operated homogenizer (IKA, Staufen, Germany) at 25,000 rpm for 3 min. Homogenate was then transferred to a new test tube, where it was shaken on a Vortex-2 Genie (Scientific Industries, New York, NY, USA) at 4 °C for 30 min. The homogenate was centrifuged (14,000 g) for 30 min at 4 °C using a Universal 32 R centrifuge (Hettich-Zentrifugen GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany). The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45 μm nylon membrane filter disk (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) prior to analysis.

2.6. Determination of Low Molecular Mass Thiols

The HPLC-ED system consisted of two solvent delivery pumps (Model 582, ESA Inc., Chelmsford, MA, USA) operating in the range of 0.001–9.999 mL/min, a Zorbax eclipse AAA C18 (150 × 4.6; 3.5 μm particles, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) column and a CoulArray electrochemical detector (Model 5600A, ESA Inc.). The electrochemical detector included one flow cell (Model 6210, ESA Inc.). The cell consisted of four working porous carbon electrodes, each with auxiliary and dry Pd/H2 reference electrodes. Both the detector and the reaction coil/column were thermostated at 32 °C. The sample (20 μl) was injected using an autosampler (Model 542 HPLC, ESA Inc.). Samples were kept in the carousel at 8 °C during the analysis. The mobile phase consisted of 80 mM TFA (A) and methanol (B). The compounds of interest were separated by the following linear gradient: 0 → 1 min (3% B), 1 → 2 min (10% B), 2 → 5 min (30% B), and 5 → 6 min (98% B). The mobile phase flow rate was 1 ml/min, and the working electrode potential was 900 mV [42,43,44,45,46]. Time of analysis was 30 min.

2.7. Descriptive Statistics

Data were processed using Microsoft Excel® (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and Statistica CZ Version 8.0 (Prague, Czech Republic). Results are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean, unless noted otherwise (Excel®). Statistical significances were determined using Statistica CZ. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered significant and were determined using multifactorial ANOVA (in particular, Scheffé’s test), which was applied for comparing means.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mold Influence on Plants

In this study, three grass species—F. pabulare (Figure 1A and B), L. perenne (Figure 1C) and F. braunii—were studied to determine whether low molecular mass thiols are involved in protective mechanisms against molds in grasses. Detecting the presence of molds on the species during the cultivation period was of primary interest. It is common knowledge that grasses can be attacked by many species of fungi.
Ijerph 09 03789 g001 1024
Figure 1. (A) Festulolium pabulare vegetation before the first cutting. (B) Leaf shoots of Festulolium pabulare before the second cutting in untreated plants. (C) Puccinia sp. on leaves of Lolium perenne.
Figure 1. (A) Festulolium pabulare vegetation before the first cutting. (B) Leaf shoots of Festulolium pabulare before the second cutting in untreated plants. (C) Puccinia sp. on leaves of Lolium perenne.
Ijerph 09 03789 g001
In the spring of 2011, there was widespread infection of grasses by Fusarium nivale. Additionally, many plants experienced multiple infections by Colletotrichum graminicola, F. pabulare and Ascochyta. In late summer and autumn, Puccinia graminis and Puccinia coronata occurred on all experimental species (Figure 1C). To a lesser extent, Blumeria graminis was also detected. Such other fungi as Alternaria spp., Cochliobolus spp., Aspergillus niger, and Ramularia spp. also were observed, but their occurrence was negligible as compared to the aforementioned species. Fungal diseases altered forage production (volume) and quality due to the fact that grasses actively defend themselves against the presence of a pathogen. There are two main types of defense pathways: (i) mechanical, and (ii) biochemical. Mechanical defense is based on an increase in the content of solid fibrous elements, which subsequently reduces the digestibility of organic matter and leads to a decline in forage quality [47]. The stress-induced biochemical pathways involve the production of several types of compounds which are able to detoxify the xenobiotics produced by fungi. Such low molecular mass thiols as cysteine, reduced glutathione, and phytochelatins are among these compounds. Thiols have been shown able to detoxify both inorganic [48,49,50,51,52] and organic [53,54,55,56,57] xenobiotics. One may also consider the fact that the occurrence of fungi may be associated with the risk of mycotoxins which reduce the health safety of forage [2]. Therefore, we were interested in evaluating the behavior of grasses attacked by a pathogen and the influence of treatment and mold presence on the content of low molecular mass thiols, because treatment itself by this fungicide, and other strobilurins, increases yield and delays plant senescence even in the absence of disease [58,59,60]. Respiration and the plant redox status are critical to the production of the thiols [61], and thus the potential for the fungicide treatment to alter this redox status is of great significance [62,63]. The fungicidal activity of strobilurins relies on their ability to inhibit mitochondrial respiration by binding at the so-called Qo site (the outer quinol-oxidation site) of the cytochrome bc1 enzyme complex (complex III). This inhibition blocks electron transfer between cytochrome b and cytochrome c1, which, in turn, leads to an energy deficiency in fungal cells by halting the production of ATP [64]. Mitochondrial glutathione, as a key survival antioxidant, could serve in the forming of some resistance of fungi against these fungicides [65].

3.2. Plant Development

Attention was primarily focused on plant development. Growth of the grasses was accompanied by a lengthening stalk formation and generative organs in the first crop. At the time of harvest, grasses were at earring stage. After the first cutting, a period of intense tillering followed. As shown in Figure 2, temperature and precipitation at the research station in Vatin were sufficient for growth within the period from June to July. An absence of vernalization was reflected in the formation of leafy shoots and absence of fertile stalks. Similar conclusions apply also for grass growth after the second cutting. No visual difference (growth, color) was present in the growing of plants treated with fungicide as compared with those not treated. Assessment of disease infection level of the studied species prior to and after the first fungicide application is shown in Table 1. While during the summer months the species showed comparable levels of disease infection, that situation changed somewhat when stronger pathogen pressure was apparent in late September. No visible differences in infection level were found between grasses treated with fungicides and those untreated. A tendency toward greater pathogen pressure was evident in L. perenne, but the differences shown in Table 1 were not statistically significant, even though L. perenne is a species more susceptible to pathogens as compared to the more resistant Festuca arundinacea and its hybrids. [66,67]. Plants in the experiment were not artificially infected, and the pathogens did not occur. The level of infection can be influenced by many factors. Comparable and low levels of infection in the evaluated species could have been affected by weather conditions adverse for the growth of mold. Had higher pressure from pathogens been evident, that might have substantiated a benefit from use of fungicides and showed the a priori anticipated differences between treated and untreated variants. The plants sown under controlled conditions served as a control group and showed no occurrence of fungal diseases. Under the controlled conditions, grass sprouted between 4 d and 10 d. Due to the fact that these are winter species, they formed leafy shoots, with no tendency to produce fertile stalks. Biomass sampling was performed 60 d after sowing in the tillering stage.
Ijerph 09 03789 g002 1024
Figure 2. Temperature and precipitation at the Vatin research station in 2011.
Figure 2. Temperature and precipitation at the Vatin research station in 2011.
Ijerph 09 03789 g002
Table
Table 1. Level of infection in Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare, and Festulolium braunii before and after first fungicide application (on scale of 1 (highest infection) to 9 (lowest infection)).
Table 1. Level of infection in Lolium perenne, Festulolium pabulare, and Festulolium braunii before and after first fungicide application (on scale of 1 (highest infection) to 9 (lowest infection)).
Date evaluatedLolium perenneFestulolium pabulareFestulolium braunii
No fungicideFungicide 1No fungicideFungicide 1No fungicideFungicide 1
31.5.20117.37.37.77.78.07.3
12.7.20117.37.78.08.08.08.0
26.9.20113.03.04.04.03.03.0
1 Fungicide was applied on 28 June 2011.

3.3. Low Molecular Mass Thiols

Next, low molecular mass thiols were determined. Determination was carried out as in our previously published work [42,43,44,45,46], in which our group had demonstrated detection limits for these thiols measurable down to nanograms per gram of fresh material (ng/g), with a linear detection range down to four orders of magnitude in concentration and recovery of the thiols exceeding 80%. This method was used to analyze the experimental plants. GSH and GSSG are well-known markers of oxidative stress and therefore can be used as good markers of the negative effect of mold on grasses. In relation to phytochelatins, they are mainly considered as metal pollution markers, but their richness in thiol moieties could give them the ability to scavenge reactive oxygen species [68,69]. Festulolium pabulare had higher levels of GSH and PC3 in the pot experiment (Table 2). Moreover, lower GSSG content resulted in a high GSH/GSSG ratio.
Table
Table 2. Effect of Species (S) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, and GSH/GSSG ratio in pots experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4, and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Table 2. Effect of Species (S) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5, and GSH/GSSG ratio in pots experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4, and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Factor
Species (S)CYSGSHGSSGGSH/GSSGPC2PC3PC4PC5
Lolium perenne0.652.162.161.000.2391.420.741.02
Festulolium pabulare1.433.230.437.560.283.820.440.05
Festulolium braunii6.271.711.780.960.470.640.300.03
In the field experiment (Table 3 and Table 4), PC2, PC4, and PC5 content was higher in F. pabulare. Conversely, F. braunii showed higher content of CYS. The species differed significantly (p < 0.05), however, in PC4 and PC5 content. Lower contents of GSH and GSSH and a lower GSH/GSSG ratio were recorded in September. The differences between months were not statistically confirmed. An exception was the low content of GSSG (p < 0.05) in September, taking into account the treatment factor (Table 4). Fungicide application did not result in demonstrable differences in the average content of low molecular mass thiols (Table 4).
Table
Table 3. Effect of Species (S) and Date of sample (D) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Table 3. Effect of Species (S) and Date of sample (D) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Factor
CYSGSHGSSGGSH/GSSGPC2 PC3PC4PC5
Species (S)
Lolium perenne2.9 ± 1.68.3 ± 4.51.5 ± 0.95.5 ± 2.50.5 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.10.6 ± 0.3a0.8 a ± 0.4
Festulolium pabulare6.2 ± 1.79.0 ± 5.04.7 ± 1.81.7 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.22.7 ± 0.3b2.8 a ± 1.1
Festulolium braunii8.2 ± 3.97.4 ± 2.32.9 ± 1.13.3 ± 1.50.5 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.31.4 ± 0.2a0.3 a ± 0.2
Date of sample (D)
June7.1 ± 0.811.3 ± 3.83.4 ± 2.46.2 ± 2.20.3 ± 0.10.2 ± 0.11.6 ± 1.00.6 ± 0.2
August2.5 ± 0.311.0 ± 3.24.1 ± 0.52.9 ± 1.10.7 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.21.3 ± 0.52.0 ± 1.0
September7.6 ± 4.42.3 ± 0.81.7 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.10.5 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.31.9 ± 0.41.3 ± 1.3
Average values with superscripts (a,b) are significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
Table
Table 4. Effect of Species (S), Date of sample (D), and Treatment (T) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Table 4. Effect of Species (S), Date of sample (D), and Treatment (T) on contents of CYS, GSH, GSSG, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and GSH/GSSG ratio in field experiment. Content of CYS, GSH and GSSG is expressed as µg/g of fresh weight. PC2, PC3, PC4 and PC5 are expressed as ng/g of fresh weight.
Factor
CYSGSHGSSGGSH/GSSGPC2PC3PC4PC5
Species (S)
Lolium perenne1.8 ± 0.67.0 ± 3.52.3 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.90.7 ± 0.20.5 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.70.7 ± 0.3 a
Festulolium pabulare4.8 ± 1.14.2 ± 0.62.8 ± 0.72.0 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.13.7 ± 1.42.6 ± 0.9 b
Festulolium braunii9.7 ± 4.99.2 ± 3.73.1 ± 0.72.8 ± 1.00.7 ± 0.20.8 ± 0.21.2 ± 0.30.3 ± 0.2 a
Date of sample (D)
August6.2 ± 2.99.8 ± 2.73.6 ± 0.4a2.8 ± 0.80.8 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.12.7 ± 1.11.2 ± 0.6
September4.6 ± 2.43.8 ± 1.01.9 ± 0.4b2.1 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.11.8 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.7
Treatment (T)
No fungicide5.0 ± 2.36.6 ± 2.42.9 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.20.6 ± 0.11.6 ± 0.31.7 ± 0.7
Fungicide5.8 ± 3.07.0 ± 2.52.6 ± 0.52.8 ± 0.81.2 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.12.9 ± 1.10.7 ± 0.4
Average values with superscripts (a,b) are significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
A few papers reporting on the evaluation of thiol content in the biomass of grasses have been published. For example, Raab et al. detected PC2 and PC3 in the biomass of Holcus lanatus [70]. This species is resistant to heavy metals and its arsenic contamination showed a higher content of PC3 than did Pteris cretica, which is vulnerable to heavy metals. In our pots experiment (Table 2), disease-resistant F. pabulare showed higher PC3 levels than did the more pathogen-susceptible L. perenne and F. braunii. In our field experiment, the content of PC4 and PC5 was significantly higher also in F. pabulare. Hunaiti et al. evaluated the influence of heavy metals and sulfate content on thiols in Cynodon dactylon, Amaranthus gracilis, Chenopodium murale, and Typha domingensis [71]. The increase of metal and sulfate levels in the soil at their contaminated site was correlated with a rise of total glutathione and cysteine in plants. However, the individual effects of metals and sulfate on glutathione, short-chain phytochelatin, and long-chain phytochelatin levels were dissimilar. According to Jia et al., this fact depends on plant species [72].

3.4. Interactions

The content of GSSG found in the pots experiment was comparable to the values determined under field conditions in L. perenne and F. braunii during the growing season. That assessment does not apply to F. pabulare, where an obvious decrease of GSSG from June to September and low GSSG content in plants grown under control conditions was observed (Figure 3A). The relationship between Date and Species was significant (p < 0.05) in the case of GSSG (Table 5). Comparable small changes in GSSG content during the growing season are reported in those species susceptible to fungal diseases (i.e., L. perenne and F. braunii). In contrast, F. pabulare, which can be considered resistant to infection, clearly showed a high GSSG content in June. Moreover, the content of GSSG in F. pabulare was low under control conditions.
Table
Table 5. Relationship between Date of sample (D) and Species (S) and between Species (S) and Treatment (T).
Table 5. Relationship between Date of sample (D) and Species (S) and between Species (S) and Treatment (T).
FactorCYSGSHGSSGGSH/GSSGPC2PC3PC4PC5
D × S0.99150.40840.03930.07500.99280.00050.83050.5962
S × T0.98350.90080.58800.20440.52290.00170.41690.5111
Ijerph 09 03789 g003 1024
Figure 3. (A) GSSG content in relation to Date of sample and Species. (B) GSH/GSSG ratio in relation to Date of sample and Species. (C) PC3 content in relation to Species and Treatment. (D) PC3 content in relation to Date of sample and Species.
Figure 3. (A) GSSG content in relation to Date of sample and Species. (B) GSH/GSSG ratio in relation to Date of sample and Species. (C) PC3 content in relation to Species and Treatment. (D) PC3 content in relation to Date of sample and Species.
Ijerph 09 03789 g003
Similarly, differences between species susceptible to fungal diseases (L. perenne and F. braunii) and resistant species (F. pabulare) in the assessment of GSH/GSSG are shown in Figure 3B. While the more susceptible species show a higher ratio of GSH/GSSG in June, decreasing thereafter in the continuing growing season, F. pabulare shows comparable values from June to September. A higher ratio of GSH/GSSG was found, however, in plants of F. pabulare grown under control conditions. Biomass obtained from plants grown under controlled conditions had a higher content of PC3. This fact, however, applied only to L. perenne and (especially so) to F. pabulare (Figure 3C). The relationship between Species and Treatment was significant (p < 0.05, Table 5). Even more substantial are the differences between PC3 values. Lolium perenne and F. braunii show comparable PC3 content from June to September. Lolium perenne grown under control conditions exhibited a higher PC3 content, but this discrepancy was not statistically significant. Conversely, F. pabulare grown in control conditions had high (p < 0.05) PC3 content (Figure 3D). Differences in PC3 content between plants grown under control conditions and in field experiments are very obvious. Biomass obtained from plants grown under controlled conditions had a higher PC3 content. This fact, however, applies only to L. perenne and (especially so) to F. pabulare. The relationship between Species and Treatment was significant (p < 0.05, Table 5).

4. Conclusions

Low molecular mass thiols represented by glutathione and phytochelatins are well-known markers of metal intoxication in plants, as their synthesis is catalyzed by the presence of metal ions in the intracellular environment [73]. Based on recently published studies, associations with some other types of stress, including from organic pollutants, have been indicated [55,57]. This study showed that the association of thiol content and the presence of pathogens should be taken into account. The enhancement of PC3 is interesting, and one may speculate that this thiol might be somehow involved mainly in detoxification of pathogen toxins through certain reactive oxygen scavenging pathways. This must be confirmed and clarified, however, by follow-up greenhouse and field experiments.

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this work came from the following projects: CEITEC CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0068, MSMT 6215712402 and TP IGA AF MENDELU in Brno 3/2012 Effectivity in Base Material Utilization and Environment Preservation through Animal Feed Production and Nutrition Systems.

References

  1. Ryant, P.; Skladanka, J. The effect of applications of various forms of sulfur on the yields and quality of grass forage. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2009, 59, 208–216. [Google Scholar]
  2. Skladanka, J.; Nedelnik, J.; Adam, V.; Dolezal, P.; Moravcova, H.; Dohnal, V. Forage as a primary source of mycotoxins in animal diets. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 37–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barnes, R.F.; Nelson, C.J.; Moore, K.J. Forages: The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 6th ed; Iowa State University Press: Iowa City, IA, USA, 2007; p. 791. [Google Scholar]
  4. Malinowski, D.P.; Belesky, D.P.; Hill, N.S.; Baligar, V.C.; Fedders, J.M. Influence of phosphorus on the growth and ergot alkaloid content of neotyphodium coenophialum-infected tall fescue (festuca arundinacea schreb.). Plant Soil 1998, 198, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Anderson, M.E. Glutathione: An overview of biosynthesis and modulation. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 1998, 112, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asensi, M.; Sastre, J.; Pallardo, F.V.; Lloret, A.; Lehner, M.; Garcia-de-la Asuncion, J.; Vina, J. Ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione as indicator of oxidative stress status and DNA damage. Oxidants and Antioxidants, Pt A 1999, 299, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Garrido, T.; Mendoza, J.; Riveros, R.; Saez, L. Acute and chronic effect of copper on levels of reduced and oxidized glutathione and nutrient uptake of tomato plants. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 920–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bielawski, W.; Joy, K.W. Reduced and oxidized glutathione and glutathione-reductase activity in tissues of pisum-sativum. Planta 1986, 169, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ogawa, K. Glutathione-associated regulation of plant growth and stress responses. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2005, 7, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paradiso, A.; Berardino, R.; de Pinto, M.C.; di Toppi, L.S.; Storelli, M.M.; Tommasi, F.; De Gara, L. Increase in ascorbate-glutathione metabolism as local and precocious systemic responses induced by cadmium in durum wheat plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2008, 49, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meister, A.; Anderson, M.E. Glutathione. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1983, 52, 711–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McGovern, J.J.; Isselbacher, K.; Rose, P.J.; Grossman, M.S. Observations on the glutathione (gsh) stability of red blood cells. AMA J. Dis. Child. 1958, 96, 502–502. [Google Scholar]
  13. Manso, C.; Wroblewski, F. Glutathione reductase activity in blood and body fluids. J. Clin. Invest. 1958, 37, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pisciotta, A.V.; Daly, M. Studies on agranulocytosis. 3. The reduced glutathione (gsh) content of leukocytes of normals and patients recovered from agranulocytosis. Blood 1960, 16, 1572–1578. [Google Scholar]
  15. Pisciotta, A.V.; Daly, M. Reduced glutathione (gsh) content of leukocytes in various hematologic diseases. Blood 1960, 15, 421–422. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mullineaux, P.M.; Rausch, T. Glutathione, photosynthesis and the redox regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. Photosynth. Res. 2005, 86, 459–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schneider, A.; Martini, N.; Rennenberg, H. Reduced glutathione (gsh) transport into cultured tobacco cells. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 1992, 30, 29–38. [Google Scholar]
  18. Herschbach, C.; Rennenberg, H. Influence of glutathione (gsh) on net uptake of sulfate and sulfate transport in tobacco plants. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45, 1069–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gelhaye, E.; Rouhier, N.; Jacquot, J.P. Evidence for a subgroup of thioredoxin h that requires gsh/grx for its reduction. FEBS Lett. 2003, 555, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rausch, T.; Gromes, R.; Liedschulte, V.; Muller, I.; Bogs, J.; Galovic, V.; Wachter, A. Novel insight into the regulation of gsh biosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Biol. 2007, 9, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liedschulte, V.; Wachter, A.; An, Z.G.; Rausch, T. Exploiting plants for glutathione (gsh) production: Uncoupling gsh synthesis from cellular controls results in unprecedented gsh accumulation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2010, 8, 807–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Suh, M.C.; Choi, D.; Liu, J.R. Cadmium resistance in transgenic tobacco plants expressing the nicotiana glutinosa l. Metallothionein-like gene. Mol. Cells 1998, 8, 678–684. [Google Scholar]
  23. Liu, J.Y.; Lu, T.; Zhao, N.M. Classification and nomenclature of plant metallothionein-like proteins based on their cysteine arrangement patterns. Acta Bot. Sinica 2000, 42, 649–652. [Google Scholar]
  24. He, H.Z.; Zhu, C.M.; Lu, T.; Zhang, R.Q.; Zhao, N.M.; Liu, J.Y. Modeling the cysteine rich domain of plant metallothionein-like protein. Acta Bot. Sinica 2002, 44, 1155–1159. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lu, T.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhang, R.Q.; Zhao, N.M. Modeling rice rgmt as a plant metallothionein-like protein by the distance geometry and homology methods. Acta Bot. Sinica 2003, 45, 1297–1306. [Google Scholar]
  26. Plocke, D.J. Cadmium-binding peptide complexes from schizosaccharomyces-pombe. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 205, 603–610. [Google Scholar]
  27. Grill, E.; Gekeler, W.; Winnacker, E.L.; Zenk, H.H. Homo-phytochelatins are heavy metal-binding peptides of homo-glutathione containing fabales. FEBS Lett. 1986, 205, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rauser, W.E. Phytochelatins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1990, 59, 61–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cobbett, C.S. Phytochelatin biosynthesis and function in heavy-metal detoxification. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2000, 3, 211–216. [Google Scholar]
  30. Cobbett, C.S. Heavy metal detoxification in plants: Phytochelatin biosynthesis and function. IUBMB Life 2001, 51, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cobbett, C.; Goldsbrough, P. Phytochelatins and metallothioneins: Roles in heavy metal detoxification and homeostasis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2002, 53, 159–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pal, R.; Rai, J.P.N. Phytochelatins: Peptides involved in heavy metal detoxification. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Diopan, V.; Shestivska, V.; Adam, V.; Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Havel, L.; Kizek, R. Determination of content of metallothionein and low molecular mass stress peptides in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2008, 94, 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Janouskova, M.; Pavlikova, D.; Macek, T.; Vosatka, M. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on the growth and cadmium uptake of tobacco with inserted metallothionein gene. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2005, 29, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Janouskova, M.; Pavlikova, D.; Macek, T.; Vosatka, M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza decreases cadmium phytoextraction by transgenic tobacco with inserted metallothionein. Plant Soil 2005, 272, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kotrba, P.; Macek, T.; Ruml, T. Heavy metal-binding peptides and proteins in plants. A review. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1999, 64, 1057–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Pavlikova, D.; Szakova, J.; Truksa, M.; Cundy, S.; Kotrba, P.; Yancey, N.; Scouten, W.H. Accumulation of cadmium by transgenic tobacco. Acta Biotechnol. 2002, 22, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Truksa, M.; Cundy, A.S.; Kotrba, P.; Yancey, N.; Schouten, W.H. Preparation of transgenic tobacco with a yeast metallothionein combined with a polyhistidine tail. Chem. Listy 1996, 90, 690–690. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pavlikova, D.; Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Sura, M.; Szakova, J.; Tlustos, P. The evaluation of cadmium, zinc and nickel accumulation ability of transgenic tobacco bearing different transgenes. Plant Soil Environ. 2004, 50, 513–517. [Google Scholar]
  40. Shestivska, V.; Adam, V.; Prasek, J.; Macek, T.; Mackova, M.; Havel, L.; Diopan, V.; Zehnalek, J.; Hubalek, J.; Kizek, R. Investigation of the antioxidant properties of metallothionein in transgenic tobacco plants using voltammetry at a carbon paste electrode. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 2869–2883. [Google Scholar]
  41. Supalkova, V.; Petrek, J.; Baloun, J.; Adam, V.; Bartusek, K.; Trnkova, L.; Beklova, M.; Diopan, V.; Havel, L.; Kizek, R. Multi-instrumental investigation of affecting of early somatic embryos of spruce by cadmium(ii) and lead(ii) ions. Sensors 2007, 7, 743–759. [Google Scholar]
  42. Diopan, V.; Stejskal, K.; Galiova, M.; Adam, V.; Kaiser, J.; Horna, A.; Novotny, K.; Liska, M.; Havel, L.; Zehnalek, J.; et al. Determination of plant thiols by liquid chromatography coupled with coulometric and amperometric detection in lettuce treated by lead(ii) ions. Electroanalysis 2010, 22, 1248–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Potesil, D.; Petrlova, J.; Adam, V.; Vacek, J.; Klejdus, B.; Zehnalek, J.; Trnkova, L.; Havel, L.; Kizek, R. Simultaneous femtomole determination of cysteine, reduced and oxidized glutathione, and phytochelatin in maize (zea mays l.) kernels using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1084, 134–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Petrlova, J.; Mikelova, R.; Stejskal, K.; Kleckerova, A.; Zitka, O.; Petrek, J.; Havel, L.; Zehnalek, J.; Adam, V.; Trnkova, L.; et al. Simultaneous determination of eight biologically active thiol compounds using gradient elution-liquid chromatography with coul-array detection. J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29, 1166–1173. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zitka, O.; Krystofova, O.; Sobrova, P.; Adam, V.; Zehnalek, J.; Beklova, M.; Kizek, R. Phytochelatin synthase activity as a marker of metal pollution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 192, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zitka, O.; Skutkova, H.; Krystofova, O.; Sobrova, P.; Adam, V.; Zehnalek, J.; Havel, L.; Beklova, M.; Hubalek, J.; Provaznik, I.; et al. Rapid and ultrasensitive method for determination of phytochelatin(2) using high performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 1367–1381. [Google Scholar]
  47. Studer, B.; Boller, B.; Bauer, E.; Posselt, U.K.; Widmer, F.; Kolliker, R. Consistent detection of qtls for crown rust resistance in italian ryegrass (lolium multiflorum lam.) across environments and phenotyping methods. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kleckerova, A.; Sobrova, P.; Krystofova, O.; Sochor, J.; Zitka, O.; Babula, P.; Adam, V.; Docekalova, H.; Kizek, R. Cadmium(ii) and zinc(ii) ions effects on maize plants revealed by spectroscopy and electrochemistry. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2011, 6, 6011–6031. [Google Scholar]
  49. Krizkova, S.; Krystofova, O.; Trnkova, L.; Hubalek, J.; Adam, V.; Beklova, M.; Horna, A.; Havel, L.; Kizek, R. Silver(i) ions ultrasensitive detection at carbon electrodes—Analysis of waters, tobacco cells and fish tissues. Sensors 2009, 9, 6934–6950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Krizkova, S.; Ryant, P.; Krystofova, O.; Adam, V.; Galiova, M.; Beklova, M.; Babula, P.; Kaiser, J.; Novotny, K.; Novotny, J. Multi-instrumental analysis of tissues of sunflower plants treated with silver(i) ions—Plants as bioindicators of environmental pollution. Sensors 2008, 8, 445–463. [Google Scholar]
  51. Krystofova, O.; Shestivska, V.; Galiova, M.; Novotny, K.; Kaiser, J.; Zehnalek, J.; Babula, P.; Opatrilova, R.; Adam, V.; Kizek, R. Sunflower plants as bioindicators of environmental pollution with lead(ii) ions. Sensors 2009, 9, 5040–5058. [Google Scholar]
  52. Krystofova, O.; Trnkova, L.; Adam, V.; Zehnalek, J.; Hubalek, J.; Babula, P.; Kizek, R. Electrochemical microsensors for the detection of cadmium(ii) and lead(ii) ions in plants. Sensors 2010, 10, 5308–5328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Memon, A.R.; Schroder, P. Implications of metal accumulation mechanisms to phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2009, 16, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Verkleij, J.A.C.; Golan-Goldhirsh, A.; Antosiewisz, D.M.; Schwitzguebel, J.P.; Schroder, P. Dualities in plant tolerance to pollutants and their uptake and translocation to the upper plant parts. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 67, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Abhilash, P.C.; Jamil, S.; Singh, N. Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27, 474–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lyubenova, L.; Schroder, P. Plants for waste water treatment—Effects of heavy metals on the detoxification system of typha latifolia. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 996–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Zhang, Y.Y.; Liu, J.H. Transgenic alfalfa plants co-expressing glutathione s-transferase (gst) and human cyp2e1 show enhanced resistance to mixed contaminates of heavy metals and organic pollutants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 189, 357–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grossmann, K.; Retzlaff, G. Bioregulatory effects of the fungicidal strobilurin kresoxim-methyl in wheat (triticum aestivum). Pestic. Sci. 1997, 50, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Glaab, J.; Kaiser, W.M. Increased nitrate reductase activity in leaf tissue after application of the fungicide kresoxim-methyl. Planta 1999, 207, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Grossmann, K.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Casper, G. Regulation of phytohormone levels, leaf senescence and transpiration by the strobilurin kresoxim-methyl in wheat (triticum aestivum). J. Plant Physiol. 1999, 154, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nason, M.A.; Farrar, J.; Bartlett, D. Strobilurin fungicides induce changes in photosynthetic gas exchange that do not improve water use efficiency of plants grown under conditions of water stress. Pest Manag. Sci. 2007, 63, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, Y.X.; von Tiedemann, A. Physiological effects of azoxystrobin and epoxiconazole on senescence and the oxidative status of wheat. Pest. Biochem. Physiol. 2001, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, Y.X.; von Tiedemann, A. Impact of fungicides on active oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes in spring barley (hordeum vulgare l.) exposed to ozone. Environ. Pollut. 2002, 116, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fernandez-Ortuno, D.; Tores, J.A.; De Vicente, A.; Perez-Garcia, A. Mechanisms of resistance to qol fungicides in phytopathogenic fungi. Int. Microbiol. 2008, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  65. Mari, M.; Morales, A.; Colell, A.; Garcia-Ruiz, C.; Fernandez-Checa, J.C. Mitochondrial glutathione, a key survival antioxidant. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2685–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Giesler, L.J.; Yuen, G.Y.; Horst, G.L. The microclimate in tall fescue turf as affected by canopy density and its influence on brown patch disease. Plant Dis. 1996, 80, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. von Boberfeld, W.O.; Banzhaf, K. Yield and forage quality of different xfestulolium cultivars in winter. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2006, 192, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Becana, M.; Matamoros, M.A.; Udvardi, M.; Dalton, D.A. Recent insights into antioxidant defenses of legume root nodules. New Phytol. 2010, 188, 960–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Shen, G.M.; Zhu, C.; Shangguan, L.N.; Du, Q.Z. The cd-tolerant rice mutant cadh-5 is a high cd accumulator and shows enhanced antioxidant activity. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012, 175, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raab, A.; Feldmann, J.; Meharg, A.A. The nature of arsenic-phytochelatin complexes in holcus lanatus and pteris cretica. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 1113–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hunaiti, A.A.; Al-Oqlah, A.; Shannag, N.M.; Abukhalaf, I.K.; Silvestrov, N.A.; von Deutsch, D.A.; Bayorh, M.A. Toward understanding the influence of soil metals and sullfate content on plant thiols. J. Toxicol. Env. Health Part A 2007, 70, 559–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Jia, Y.; Tang, S.R.; Wang, R.G.; Ju, X.H.; Ding, Y.Z.; Tu, S.X.; Smith, D.L. Effects of elevated co2 on growth, photosynthesis, elemental composition, antioxidant level, and phytochelatin concentration in lolium mutiforum and lolium perenne under cd stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180, 384–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Supalkova, V.; Huska, D.; Diopan, V.; Hanustiak, P.; Zitka, O.; Stejskal, K.; Baloun, J.; Pikula, J.; Havel, L.; Zehnalek, J.; et al. Electroanalysis of plant thiols. Sensors 2007, 7, 932–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skladanka, J.; Adam, V.; Zitka, O.; Krystofova, O.; Beklova, M.; Kizek, R.; Havlicek, Z.; Slama, P.; Nawrath, A. Investigation into the Effect of Molds in Grasses on Their Content of Low Molecular Mass Thiols. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 3789-3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113789

AMA Style

Skladanka J, Adam V, Zitka O, Krystofova O, Beklova M, Kizek R, Havlicek Z, Slama P, Nawrath A. Investigation into the Effect of Molds in Grasses on Their Content of Low Molecular Mass Thiols. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012; 9(11):3789-3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skladanka, Jiri, Vojtech Adam, Ondrej Zitka, Olga Krystofova, Miroslava Beklova, Rene Kizek, Zdenek Havlicek, Petr Slama, and Adam Nawrath. 2012. "Investigation into the Effect of Molds in Grasses on Their Content of Low Molecular Mass Thiols" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 11: 3789-3805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9113789

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop