Next Article in Journal
Bayesian Variable Selection in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Associations between Physical Activity and Health Parameters in Adolescent Pupils in Egypt
Previous Article in Journal
Ethanol and Cognition: Indirect Effects, Neurotoxicity and Neuroprotection: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perceived Exercise Benefits and Barriers of Non-Exercising Female University Students in the United Kingdom
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7(4), 1558-1576; doi:10.3390/ijerph7041558

A Comparison of Two Motion Sensors for the Assessment of Free-Living Physical Activity of Adolescents

1
Center for Kinantropology Research, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic
2
Faculty of Sport, Health and Social Care, University of Gloucestershire, Gloucester GL2 9HW, UK
3
Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 5 February 2010 / Revised: 16 March 2010 / Accepted: 25 March 2010 / Published: 6 April 2010
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health and Wellbeing of Children, Adolescents and Young Adults)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [409 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

This study assessed and compared the daily step counts recorded by two different motion sensors in order to estimate the free-living physical activity of 135 adolescent girls. Each girl concurrently wore a Yamax pedometer and an ActiGraph accelerometer (criterion measure) every day for seven consecutive days. The convergent validity of the pedometer can be considered intermediate when used to measure the step counts in free-living physical activity; but should be considered with caution when used to classify participants’ step counts into corresponding physical activity categories because of a likelihood of ‘erroneous’ classification in comparison with the accelerometer. View Full-Text
Keywords: pedometer; accelerometer; validity; monitoring; measurement; step counter; categorization of physical activity pedometer; accelerometer; validity; monitoring; measurement; step counter; categorization of physical activity
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Cuberek, R.; El Ansari, W.; Frömel, K.; Skalik, K.; Sigmund, E. A Comparison of Two Motion Sensors for the Assessment of Free-Living Physical Activity of Adolescents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 1558-1576.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top