Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7(1), 29-45; doi:10.3390/ijerph7010029
Article

Epidemiological Methods: About Time

1,2email
Received: 29 October 2009; Accepted: 24 December 2009 / Published: 31 December 2009
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Epidemiology)
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Epidemiological studies often produce false positive results due to use of statistical approaches that either ignore or distort time. The three time-related issues of focus in this discussion are: (1) cross-sectional vs. cohort studies, (2) statistical significance vs. public health significance, and (3), how risk factors "work together" to impact public health significance. The issue of time should be central to all thinking in epidemiology research, affecting sampling, measurement, design, analysis and, perhaps most important, the interpretation of results that might influence clinical and public-health decision-making and subsequent clinical research.
Keywords: risk factors; statistical and clinical significance; effect sizes; moderators; mediators
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [363 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014 02:26 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Kraemer, H.C. Epidemiological Methods: About Time. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 7, 29-45.

AMA Style

Kraemer HC. Epidemiological Methods: About Time. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2010; 7(1):29-45.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kraemer, Helena Chmura. 2010. "Epidemiological Methods: About Time." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7, no. 1: 29-45.


Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert