Next Article in Journal
Antibiotic Resistance of Acinetobacter spp. Isolates from the River Danube: Susceptibility Stays High
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Interprofessional Relationships from Nurses’ Perspective on the Decision-Making Capacity of Patients in a Clinical Setting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 15
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph15010051
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Land Use and Point Source Pollution on Water Quality in a Developed Region: A Case Study in Shunde, China

by
Wenjing Bo
1,2,
Xiaoke Wang
1,2,*,
Qianqian Zhang
3,
Yi Xiao
1 and
Zhiyun Ouyang
1
1
State Key Laboratory for Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Haidian District, Beijing 100085, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(1), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010051
Submission received: 28 November 2017 / Revised: 21 December 2017 / Accepted: 27 December 2017 / Published: 30 December 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To design and implement policy to manage water quality, it is important to investigate land use and possible sources of pollution. In this study, using Pearson regression analysis, redundancy analysis and multiple regression analysis, we assess the influence of land use and point sources on water quality in the river system in Shunde district in 2000 and 2010. The results show that water quality was related positively with water surface but negatively with impervious and urban greening area. Additionally, water quality was related negatively to point source emissions of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N). The total explanatory power of spatial variation of water quality was improved from 43.4% to 60.0% in 2000 and from 31.3% to 57.8% in 2010, respectively, when the influence of point sources was added into redundancy analysis between water quality and land use. Thus, both land use management and point source pollution control should be considered for improving river water quality.

1. Introduction

River water quality is strongly influenced by land use [1,2]. Many studies have reported that most water pollutants such as particles, nutrients and metals show a significantly positive correlation with the percentage of construction land and a significantly negative correlation with percent woodland [3,4,5,6]. Cropland cover, however, may have a more complex relationship with water quality. The increase of farmland coverage was found to increase the concentrations of both nitrate and sulfate ion in some case studies [7], but to not influence others [8]. Other emerging types of land use, such as nursery garden and urban green land, have received relatively little attention in research on water quality and their effects could be underestimated. Previous studies have shown that land use close to a river was a better predictor of water quality than the spatial pattern of the entire watershed [9,10]. In addition, in many regions with flat relief and canals, it is impossible to clearly delineate the watershed boundary. Therefore, in this study, we created a wide range of buffer zones to analyze the effect of land use adjacent to rivers on water quality. However, the relationships between land use and water quality vary significantly, because watershed characteristics and point source pollution vary across different regions [11,12]. Study areas with point source pollution might weaken the relationships between land use and water quality [5,11]. In this study, we integrate point source pollution emission into correlation analysis of land use and water quality, aiming to assess how point source pollution affects river water quality.
Shunde district is a very developed region in the Pearl River delta, the Gross domestic product (GDP) reached CNY 279.3 billion in 2016 which ranks first amongst 987 municipal districts in China. It has shifted from a traditional agriculture-based economy to a manufactured-based economy [13]. With industrialization and urbanization, a significant amount of cultivated land has been converted to built-up land. From 2000 to 2010, cropland decreased from 139.5 to 12.7 km2, whilst impervious surface increased from 300.2 to 371.3 km2. Urbanization and population growth lead to increased point and non-point source pollutant emission in Shunde district [14]. There were 12,000 manufacturing enterprises such as appliance manufacture, metal manufacturing and furniture manufacturing. A large amount of sewage was discharged into rivers, which increased from 17.68 million metric tons in 2000 to 93.49 million metric tons in 2010 [15]. Both this land use change and point source of pollution may impact water quality.
The objectives of this work are to delineate the changes of water quality in Shunde district between 2000 and 2010 and reveal the roles of non-point source pollution, changing land use pattern and point source pollution on water quality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This research covers Shunde district (22°40′ N–23°2′ N, 113°1′ E–113°23′ E), located in the central part of the Pearl River Delta, Guangdong Province, Southern China. Shunde district has a subtropical monsoon climate, with long summers and short winters. The average annual temperature and precipitation are 21.9 °C and 1639 mm, respectively. Shunde district has 16 main rivers and over 120 streams flow through this area and make up a 215 km2 network of dikes and ponds, which constitute 26.7% of the total area of Shunde.

2.2. Data Sources

Water quality at 16 sites (Figure 1)were monitored monthly in 2000 and 2010 by Shunde Environmental Monitoring Center, according to protocols of surface water quality sampling and analysis issued by the Chinese State Environment Protection Agency [16]. The 16 sites are located in the five main waterways in Shunde district, namely Ronggui, Shunde branch waterway, Tanzhou, Donghai and the Shunde waterway. Six water quality parameters were monitored: pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), permanganate index (CODMn), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), ammonium-nitrogen (NH4-N) and fluoride. Besides these parameters, five heavy metals contents have also been monitored but not assessed in this study because their concentrations are below the limits of their detective values.
Land use data with resolutions of 30 m in 2000 and 2010 were produced from satellite Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper images and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectro-radiometer by the Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Land use was classified into nine types: forest, shrub, pond, river, cropland, nursery garden, impervious surface, urban green land and bare land.
To quantify the effects of land use on river water quality, eleven buffer zones (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, 1500, and 2000 m) within the range of 1000 m upstream and 100 m downstream were created using Arcgis 10.2 [4]. To generate reproducible data, the 2000 m buffer zone was chosen as land use is easier to predict in this zone (Appendix Figure A1).
The location (latitude and longitude) discharge amounts, COD values and NH4-N emissions from point sources in 2000 and 2010 were provided by Shunde Environmental Monitoring Center. The annual emissions of COD and NH4-N increased from 0.35 to 0.011 billion tons to 0.58 and 0.018 billion tons, respectively, between 2000 and 2010. The point sources within a 2000 m buffer zone were used to quantify the effects of point source pollution on river water quality.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Many statistical tests have been widely applied to determine the relationship between land use and water quality, such as correlation analysis [3,4,7,17,18], multiple regression [5,19], principal component analysis [5,20] and redundancy analysis [2,4]. In this study, the changes in water quality between 2000 and 2010 were assessed by t-test. Pearson correlation analysis and redundancy analysis were performed to test the quantitative relationship between land use within a 2000 m buffer zone and water quality parameters. In the analysis, the dependent parameter is water quality, and the independent parameter is type of land use. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the relationships between variables, point source pollutant emission, land use type and water quality in 2000 and 2010. Before using redundancy analysis, detrended correspondence analysis was employed to determine which method was more suitable, a linear (redundancy analysis) or a unimodal ordination method, canonical correspondence analysis as recommended by [21]. As the detrended correspondence analysis gradient shaft length was less than 3, redundancy analysis was used to determine the relationship between land use types, point sources emission and water quality in 2000 and 2010. Pearson correlation analysis, t-test and multiple regression analysis were carried out with SPSS 19.0 (IBM, Armonk NY, USA) for Windows. Detrended correspondence analysis and redundancy analysis were performed with CANOCO 4.5 (Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA) for Windows.

3. Results

3.1. Water Quality Changed between 2000 and 2010

Water quality parameters changed markedly from 2000 to 2010 (Table 1). pH value significantly (p < 0.01) decreased from 7.83 in 2000 to 7.52 in 2010. CODMn significantly (p < 0.05) decreased from 2.35 mg/L in 2000 to 2.19 mg/L in 2010, while BOD, NH4-N and fluoride significantly (p < 0.01) increased from 1.31, 0.20 and 0.18 mg/L in 2000, respectively, to 2.05, 0.39 and 0.31 mg/L, respectively, in 2010.

3.2. Impact of Land Use Characteristics on Water Quality

Pearson regression analysis suggested the proportion of water, impervious land, green land and cropland are major factors influencing water quality (Figure 2). In 2000, the impervious surface and green land were negatively correlated with water quality. The proportion of impervious surface was correlated negatively with DO and positively with CODMn and NH4-N; the proportion of green land was correlated positively with NH4-N. However, the proportion of water surface was correlated negatively with CODMn and NH4-N.
In 2010, the proportion of impervious surface, green land, water surface and cropland affect the water quality (Figure 2). Pearson regression analysis showed that the proportion of impervious surface was positively correlated with BOD and NH4-N and the proportion of green land was correlated positively with CODMn. However, the water surface and cropland improved water quality. The proportion of water surface was negatively correlated with BOD and the proportion of cropland was negatively correlated with CODMn.

3.3. Impacts of Land Use and Point Source Pollution on Water Quality

Redundancy analysis was used to assess the impacts of land use and point source pollution within a 2000 m buffer on water quality in 2000 and 2010. Total explanatory power significantly increased from 31.3% to 57.8% when COD and NH4-N emissions were included in redundancy analysis in 2010 and from 43.4% to 60.0% when COD emission were included in redundancy analysis in 2000 (Table 2), indicating that point sources pollution have important impacts on water quality.
In Figure 3, redundancy analysis results of land use and water quality are presented. CODMn and NH4-N concentrations were closely related to the proportions of urban green and impervious land and BOD was closely related with COD emission and proportion of forest in 2000. CODMn and NH4-N were closed related with COD and NH4-N emissions and urban green and impervious land in 2010.
Multiple regression analysis also indicated that CODMn and NH4-N emissions were important factors influencing water quality because they were positively related with CODMn (p < 0.05), NH4-N (p < 0.01) but negatively related with DO (p < 0.01) in 2010. A similar case was observed in 2000: CODMn emission was an important factor on water quality because it was positively related to CODMn (p < 0.05), BOD (p < 0.05), fluoride (p < 0.05) and negatively related to DO (p < 0.05).
Land use within a buffer zone also influenced water quality (Table 3). In 2000, the proportion of impervious surface was very positively correlated with CODMn (p < 0.05), NH4-N (p < 0.05). In 2010, the proportion of urban green land was significantly positively correlated with CODMn (p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of Land Use on River Water Quality

Urbanization in rapidly developing areas has led to an increase in impervious surfaces including roads, roofs, parking lots, sidewalks and a decrease in surfaces that can absorb and purify rainstorm runoff [22]. In our results, changes in the proportion of impervious surfaces showed a positive relationship with BOD, NH4-N and CODMn and a negative relationship with DO. This is consistent with previous studies which indicate that an impervious surface plays an important role in reducing water quality in adjacent aquatic systems [7,8,20,23,24]. An impervious surface can change natural hydrological conditions by increasing the volume and the velocity of storm runoff [25] and preventing natural percolation [22]. Storm runoff in urban areas contains various pollutants from residential and industrial areas [26,27,28], flows into rivers and reduces water quality [29]. Previous investigations have showed that the CODMn, BOD and NH4-N content of storm water runoff from impervious surfaces were higher than other land use types in Shunde district [30,31].
The proportion of cropland was negatively correlated with CODMn, which is consistent with the literature [8,32]. The major crop in Shunde district is green forage, which accounted for 54% of total cultivated area in 2010 [33]. Cropland composed of green forage can intercept some pollutants in storm runoff that is destined for the waterways. Therefore, we believe that planting green forage can intercept some pollutants near the river in Shunde district.
Previous research has shown that surface water negatively correlates with water quality [4]. Hydrological and biogeochemical processes in the water surface near the river are physically and biochemically connected to the water-quality in downstream rivers [34]. Our analysis, however, indicated that surface water negatively correlated with CODMn, NH4-N and BOD, which may be due to the dilution and biodegradation of the pollutants [35]. Therefore, we argue that wetland including swamps, lakes and ponds can purify pollutants in the river basin in Shunde district.
It was determined that urban green land was positively correlated with NH4-N and CODMn, which is consistent with results of other studies [36]. The intensive management of urban green areas, such as watering, fertilizing and spraying insecticide have negative effects on water quality [37]. Therefore, anthropogenic management of urban green land influences water quality. Hence, it is important to choose plant species that require less management and use lower levels of pesticides and fertilizers in the riparian zone.
Prolonged exposure to fluoride at high levels can lead to health problem [38]. In our study, the land use types within riparian zone have little effect on Fluoride (Figure 2). Many previous studies have reported that fluoride was released mainly from industrial sources, such as electrolytic extraction of aluminum ore, smelting iron ore, ceramics production and so on [39,40]. Our results also showed that the fluoride content of river in Shunde district is closely related to point source pollutant emissions in 2000 and 2010 (Table 3).

4.2. Influence of Point Source Pollution on Water Quality

Numerous studies have indicated that the relationships between land use and water quality do exist although it may vary with space and time because of different watershed characteristics and point sources of pollution [18,41]. Point sources of pollution might weaken the relationships between land use and water quality [5,11]. In our results, the total explanatory power significantly increased when point source pollution was added to redundancy analysis, indicating point source of pollution has an important impact on water quality. Our study also showed that COD and NH4-N emissions were positively correlated with CODMn, NH4-N and Fluoride but negatively correlated with DO (Table 3). Therefore, point source control is important for improving river water quality in the developed region.

5. Conclusions

This study highlights that there is a correlation between adjacent land use types and water quality in Shunde river district. The Pearson correlation analysis indicated that the impervious surface was positively correlated with BOD, CODMn, NH4-N and negatively with DO. However, water surface was negatively correlated with BOD and NH4-N. The water quality of rivers in Shunde district declined between 2000 and 2010 mainly due to changes in land use and emission of point source pollutants. The percentage of water surface significantly decreased and the proportion of impervious surface significantly increased from 2000 to 2010. Redundancy analysis indicated that point source pollutant emissions as well as adjacent land use types had important impacts on water quality. Multiple regression analysis indicated that an impervious surface correlated positively with CODMn, NH4-N and negatively with DO. In addition to point source pollutants, COD and NH4-N emissions were positive correlated with CODMn, BOD, NH4-N and fluoride. Although many factors may influence water quality in rivers, in this study, we demonstrated how point source pollution influences water quality and highlights a relationship between land use and water quality in a rapidly developing district of China.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Shunde district Environmental Monitoring Center for hydrologic monitoring stations information and water quality data, as well as Zhenguang Lin and Xiaojing Liu for help with data collection. Funding for this study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0503402) and the Fundamental Research Funds of the Institute of Hydrogeology and Environmental Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (Grant No. SK201612).

Author Contributions

Wenjing Bo and Xiaoke Wang conceived and designed the research; Wenjing Bo and Xiaoke Wang performed the research; Qianqian Zhang, Yi Xiao and Zhiyun Ouyang contributed to interpretation of data for the work; Wenjing Bo analyzed the data; and Wenjing Bo, Xiaoke Wang, Qianqian Zhang, Yi Xiao and Zhiyun Ouyang wrote the paper and approved the final version to be published.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Ijerph 15 00051 g0a1 550
Figure A1. Mean value of land use characteristics of the river section within the buffer of 100 m–2000 m in 2000 and 2010.
Figure A1. Mean value of land use characteristics of the river section within the buffer of 100 m–2000 m in 2000 and 2010.
Ijerph 15 00051 g0a1

References

  1. Hopkins, R.L. Use of landscape pattern metrics and multiscale data in aquatic species distribution models: a case study of a freshwater mussel. Landsc. Ecol. 2009, 24, 943–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shen, Z.Y.; Hou, X.S.; Li, W.; Aini, G.Z.; Chen, L.; Gong, Y.W. Impact of landscape pattern at multiple spatial scales on water quality: A case study in a typical urbanised watershed in China. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 417–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xia, L.L.; Liu, R.Z.; Zao, Y.W. Correlation Analysis of Landscape Pattern and Water Quality in Baiyangdian Watershed. In Proceedings of the 18th Biennial Isem Conference on Ecological Modelling for Global Change and Coupled Human and Natural System, Beijing, China, 20–23 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, X.; Zhou, W.Q.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Li, W.F.; Han, L.J. Spatial-Temporal Variations of Water Quality and Its Relationship to Land Use and Land Cover in Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Nielsen, A.; Trolle, D.; Sondergaard, M.; Lauridsen, T.L.; Bjerring, R.; Olesen, J.E.; Jeppesen, E. Watershed land use effects on lake water quality in Denmark. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22, 1187–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Haidary, A.; Amiri, B.J.; Adamowski, J.; Fohrer, N.; Nakane, K. Assessing the Impacts of Four Land Use Types on the Water Quality of Wetlands in Japan. Water Resour. Manag. 2013, 27, 2217–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tong, S.T.Y.; Chen, W.L. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality. J. Environ. Manag. 2002, 66, 377–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sliva, L.; Williams, D.D. Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality. Water Res. 2001, 35, 3462–3472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhou, T.; Wu, J.G.; Peng, S.L. Assessing the effects of landscape pattern on river water quality at multiple scales: A case study of the Dongjiang River watershed, China. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 166–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Johnson, L.B.; Richards, C.; Host, G.E.; Arthur, J.W. Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystems. Freshwat. Biol. 1997, 37, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, P.; Huang, J.; Pontius, R.G.; Hong, H. New insight into the correlations between land use and water quality in a coastal watershed of China: Does point source pollution weaken it? Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 543, 591–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tu, J.; Xia, Z.G. Examining spatially varying relationships between land use and water quality using geographically weighted regression I: Model design and evaluation. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 407, 358–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, Y.T.; Li, F.B.; Chen, J.J.; Yang, G.Y.; Wan, H.F.; Bin Zhang, T.; Zeng, X.D.; Liu, J.M. The concentrations, distribution and sources of PAHs in agricultural soils and vegetables from Shunde, Guangdong, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 139, 61–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cai, L.M.; Xu, Z.C.; Bao, P.; He, M.; Dou, L.; Chen, L.G.; Zhou, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.G. Multivariate and geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and source of arsenic and heavy metals in the agricultural soils in Shunde, Southeast China. J Geochem. Explor. 2015, 148, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shunde Environment Protection Bereau. The Environmental Quality Report of Shunde District; Shunde Environment Protection Bereau: Shunde, China, 2011; pp. 43–48.
  16. Chinese State Envrionment Protection Bureau. Water and Wastewater Monitoring Analysis Methods, 4th ed.; Chinese Environment Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002.
  17. Bu, H.M.; Meng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Wan, J. Relationships between land use patterns and water quality in the Taizi River basin, China. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 41, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, S.W.; Hwang, S.J.; Lee, S.B.; Hwang, H.S.; Sung, H.C. Landscape ecological approach to the relationships of land use patterns in watersheds to water quality characteristics. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 92, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Neal, C.; Williams, R.J.; Neal, M.; Bhardwaj, L.C.; Wickham, H.; Harrow, M.; Hill, L.K. The water quality of the River Thames at a rural site downstream of Oxford. Sci. Total Environ. 2000, 251, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharma, S.; Roy, A.; Agrawal, M. Spatial variations in water quality of river Ganga with respect to land uses in Varanasi. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 21872–21882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ter Braak, C.J.F.; Smilauer, P. Topics in constrained and unconstrained ordination. Plant Ecol. 2015, 216, 683–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Brabec, E.; Schulte, S.; Richards, P.L. Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning. J. Plan. Lit. 2002, 16, 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tromboni, F.; Dodds, W.K. Relationships Between Land Use and Stream Nutrient Concentrations in a Highly Urbanized Tropical Region of Brazil: Thresholds and Riparian Zones. Environ. Manag. 2017, 60, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, J.; Zhan, J.; Yan, H.; Wu, F.; Deng, X. Evaluation of the Impacts of Land Use on Water Quality: A Case Study in The Chaohu Lake Basin. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 329187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khare, Y.P.; Martinez, C.J.; Toor, G.S. Water Quality and Land Use Changes in the Alafia and Hillsborough River Watersheds, Florida, USA. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2012, 48, 1276–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Clark, S.E.; Steele, K.A.; Spicher, J.; Siu, C.Y.S.; Lalor, M.M.; Pitt, R.; Kirby, J.T. Roofing materials’ contributions to storm-water runoff pollution. J. Irrig. Drainage Eng-ASC 2008, 134, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Memon, S.; Paule, M.C.; Yoo, S.; Umer, R.; Lee, B.Y.; Sukhbaatar, C.; Lee, C.H. Trend of storm water runoff pollutants temporal variability from different land use sites in Korea. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 63, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brown, J.N.; Peake, B.M. Sources of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban stormwater runoff. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 359, 145–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lee, J.H.; Bang, K.W. Characterization of urban stormwater runoff. Water Res. 2000, 34, 1773–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shuai, H. Effects of Land use structure on the non-point source pollution in Nanhai district of Foshan. Guangzhou Environ. Sci. 2007, 22, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shuai, H.; Xia, B. Effects of land use structure on non-point source pollution in the area of Guangzhou, Foshan. Trop. Geography 2006, 26, 229–233. [Google Scholar]
  32. Neill, C.; Jankowski, K.; Brando, P.M.; Coe, M.T.; Deegan, L.A.; Macedo, M.N.; Riskin, S.H.; Porder, S.; Elsenbeer, H.; Krusche, A.V. Surprisingly Modest Water Quality Impacts From Expansion and Intensification of Large-Sscale Commercial Agriculture in the Brazilian Amazon-Cerrado Region. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 2017, 10, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shunde Bureau of Statistics. Shunde Statistical Yearbook; China Statistics Press: Shunde district, China, 2011; pp. 46–47.
  34. Alexander, R.B.; Boyer, E.W.; Smith, R.A.; Schwarz, G.E.; Moore, R.B. The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Shen, Z.Y.; Hou, X.S.; Li, W.; Aini, G. Relating landscape characteristics to non-point source pollution in a typical urbanized watershed in the municipality of Beijing. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2014, 123, 96–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahearn, D.S.; Sheibley, R.W.; Dahlgren, R.A.; Anderson, M.; Johnson, J.; Tate, K.W. Land use and land cover influence on water quality in the last free-flowing river draining the western Sierra Nevada, California. J. Hydrol. 2005, 313, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gilbert, J.K.; Clausen, J.C. Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from asphalt, paver, and crushed stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Res. 2006, 40, 826–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Amini, M.; Mueller, K.; Abbaspour, K.C.; Rosenberg, T.; Afyuni, M.; Moller, K.N.; Sarr, M.; Johnson, C.A. Statistical modeling of global geogenic fluoride contamination in groundwaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 3662–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhong, B.Q.; Wang, L.Q.; Liang, T.; Xing, B.S. Pollution level and inhalation exposure of ambient aerosol fluoride as affected by polymetallic rare earth mining and smelting in Baotou, north China. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 167, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Franzaring, J.; Hrenn, H.; Schumm, C.; Kiumpp, A.; Fangmeier, A. Environmental monitoring of fluoride emissions using precipitation, dust, plant and soil samples. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Huang, J.L.; Li, Q.S.; Pontius, R.G.; Klemas, V.; Hong, H.S. Detecting the Dynamic Linkage between Landscape Characteristics and Water Quality in a Subtropical Coastal Watershed, Southeast China. Environ. Manag. 2013, 51, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 15 00051 g001 550
Figure 1. The spatial distribution of the 16 sample sites in study area of Shunde district.
Figure 1. The spatial distribution of the 16 sample sites in study area of Shunde district.
Ijerph 15 00051 g001
Ijerph 15 00051 g002 550
Figure 2. Pearson relationships between water quality and land use types within the 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “*” and “**” refer that the coefficients (r) are significant at the 0.05 level and at the 0.01 level, respectively.
Figure 2. Pearson relationships between water quality and land use types within the 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “*” and “**” refer that the coefficients (r) are significant at the 0.05 level and at the 0.01 level, respectively.
Ijerph 15 00051 g002
Ijerph 15 00051 g003 550
Figure 3. Redundancy analysis results of land use and water quality at 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “imp” refers to impervious surface; “DO”, “CODMn”, “BOD” and “NH4-N” refer to dissolved oxygen; permanganate index; biochemical oxygen demand and ammonium-nitrogen, respectively. “ECOD” and “ENH4-N” refer to chemical oxygen demand emission and ammonium-nitrogen emission.
Figure 3. Redundancy analysis results of land use and water quality at 2000 m buffer in 2000 and 2010. “imp” refers to impervious surface; “DO”, “CODMn”, “BOD” and “NH4-N” refer to dissolved oxygen; permanganate index; biochemical oxygen demand and ammonium-nitrogen, respectively. “ECOD” and “ENH4-N” refer to chemical oxygen demand emission and ammonium-nitrogen emission.
Ijerph 15 00051 g003
Table
Table 1. Mean value and t-test results of water quality variables at the sample sites of Shunde district between 2000 and 2010.
Table 1. Mean value and t-test results of water quality variables at the sample sites of Shunde district between 2000 and 2010.
Variables200020102000–2010
t-StatisticSignificance
pH7.83 ± 0.057.52 ± 0.128.71<0.01
DO6.82 ± 0.216.84 ± 0.34−0.150.87
CODMn2.35 ± 0.132.19 ± 0.132.160.04
BOD1.31 ± 0.242.05 ± 0.20−5.56<0.01
NH4-N0.20 ± 0.090.39 ± 0.12−5.12<0.01
Fluoride0.18 ± 0.080.31 ± 0.02−6.70<0.01
DO: dissolved oxygen; CODMn: permanganate index; BOD: biochemical oxygen demand; NH4-N: ammonium-nitrogen.
Table
Table 2. The dominant land use groups with the maximum explanatory power within 2000 m buffer scale in 2000 and 2010.
Table 2. The dominant land use groups with the maximum explanatory power within 2000 m buffer scale in 2000 and 2010.
YearDominant VariableLand UseDominant VariablePoint Source Pollution + Land Use
Cumulative Explained Variance (%)Total Explained Variance (%)p-ValueCumulative Explained Variance (%)Total Explained Variance (%)p-Value
2000Imp29.343.40.01imp29.360.00.01
Forest31.9ECOD44.9
Nursery38.4forest49.0
Cropland41.3green land54.3
2010Imp14.431.30.09water22.657.80.03
Green land19.7ENH4-N42.3
Cropland23.9green land45.9
Nursery25.0ECOD48.5
Imp: impervious surface; ECOD: chemical oxygen demand emission; ENH4-N: ammonium-nitrogen emission.
Table
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis between land use types in 2000 m buffer, point source pollution emissions and water quality indicators.
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis between land use types in 2000 m buffer, point source pollution emissions and water quality indicators.
IndicatorFirstSecondThirdR2 Adj
FactorStd. Coef.FactorStd. Coef.FactorStd. Coef.
CODMn_2000Imp0.47 *ECOD0.43 *----0.472
CODMn_2010Green land0.51 *ECOD0.48 *----0.472
BOD_2000ECOD0.59 **Green land0.31Forest0.220.331
BOD_2010Nursery−1.58Forest1.41Green land1.050.274
NH4-N_2000Imp0.91 **Forest−0.48Nursery0.410.536
NH4-N_2010ENH4-N1.94 *ECOD−1.39Green land1.110.568
DO_2000Forest−0.48ECOD−0.42Nursery0.390.439
DO_2010ENH4-N−0.81 **Cropland−0.23Green land−0.190.537
Fluoride_2000ECOD0.62 *Imp−0.57Water−0.380.323
Fluoride_2010ENH4-N1.56ECOD−0.98--0.338
* Coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level; ** Coefficient is significant at the 0.01 level. “Std. Coef.” is the abbreviation of standardized coefficients. “imp” refers to impervious surface; “DO”, “CODMn”, “BOD” and “NH4-N” refer to dissolved oxygen; permanganate index; biochemical oxygen demand and ammonium-nitrogen, respectively. “ECOD” and “ENH4-N” refer to chemical oxygen demand emission and ammonium-nitrogen emission, respectively.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bo, W.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiao, Y.; Ouyang, Z. Influence of Land Use and Point Source Pollution on Water Quality in a Developed Region: A Case Study in Shunde, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010051

AMA Style

Bo W, Wang X, Zhang Q, Xiao Y, Ouyang Z. Influence of Land Use and Point Source Pollution on Water Quality in a Developed Region: A Case Study in Shunde, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(1):51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010051

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bo, Wenjing, Xiaoke Wang, Qianqian Zhang, Yi Xiao, and Zhiyun Ouyang. 2018. "Influence of Land Use and Point Source Pollution on Water Quality in a Developed Region: A Case Study in Shunde, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 1: 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010051

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop