On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment
AbstractTo reflect the initiative design and initiative of human security management and safety warning, ecological safety assessment is of great value. In the comprehensive evaluation of regional ecological security with the participation of experts, the expert’s individual judgment level, ability and the consistency of the expert’s overall opinion will have a very important influence on the evaluation result. This paper studies the consistency measure and consensus measure based on the multiplicative and additive consistency property of fuzzy preference relation (FPR). We firstly propose the optimization methods to obtain the optimal multiplicative consistent and additively consistent FPRs of individual and group judgments, respectively. Then, we put forward a consistency measure by computing the distance between the original individual judgment and the optimal individual estimation, along with a consensus measure by computing the distance between the original collective judgment and the optimal collective estimation. In the end, we make a case study on ecological security for five cities. Result shows that the optimal FPRs are helpful in measuring the consistency degree of individual judgment and the consensus degree of collective judgment. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Gong, Z.; Wang, L. On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1012.
Gong Z, Wang L. On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(9):1012.Chicago/Turabian Style
Gong, Zaiwu; Wang, Lihong. 2017. "On Consistency Test Method of Expert Opinion in Ecological Security Assessment." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, no. 9: 1012.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.