Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration
AbstractThe aim of this study is to compare vibration exposure to noise exposure from railway traffic in terms of equal annoyance, i.e., to determine when a certain noise level is equally annoying as a corresponding vibration velocity. Based on questionnaire data from the Train Vibration and Noise Effects (TVANE) research project from residential areas exposed to railway noise and vibration, the dose response relationship for annoyance was estimated. By comparing the relationships between exposure and annoyance for areas both with and without significant vibration exposure, the noise levels and vibration velocities that had an equal probability of causing annoyance was determined using logistic regression. The comparison gives a continuous mapping between vibration velocity in the ground and a corresponding noise level at the facade that are equally annoying. For equivalent noise level at the facade compared to maximum weighted vibration velocity in the ground the probability of annoyance is approximately 20% for 59 dB or 0.48 mm/s, and about 40% for 63 dB or 0.98 mm/s. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Ögren, M.; Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A.; Smith, M.; Gustavsson, S.; Persson Waye, K. Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 805.
Ögren M, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Smith M, Gustavsson S, Persson Waye K. Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2017; 14(7):805.Chicago/Turabian Style
Ögren, Mikael; Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, Anita; Smith, Michael; Gustavsson, Sara; Persson Waye, Kerstin. 2017. "Comparison of Annoyance from Railway Noise and Railway Vibration." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, no. 7: 805.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.