Next Article in Journal
Ambient Air Pollution and Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Beijing, China
Previous Article in Journal
A Cross-Sectional Study on Selected Correlates of High risk Sexual Behavior in Polish Migrants Resident in the United Kingdom
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(4), 419; doi:10.3390/ijerph14040419

Construct Validity of an Obesity Risk Screening Tool in Two Age Groups

1
Department of Health and Human Performance, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 518 Oak Street, Metro 105 Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA
2
Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, 257 Forker Building, Ames, IA 50011, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Peter Clifton
Received: 21 February 2017 / Revised: 4 April 2017 / Accepted: 9 April 2017 / Published: 14 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Global Health)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [287 KB, uploaded 14 April 2017]

Abstract

Home environment influences child health, but the impact varies as children move into adolescence. The Family Nutrition and Physical Activity (FNPA) screening tool has been used to evaluate home environments, but studies have not compared the utility of the tool in different age groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of the FNPA tool in first and tenth grade samples. Parents of first grade (n = 250) and tenth grade (n = 99) students completed the FNPA and results were linked to body mass index (BMI) data. FNPA scores were examined by gender, income, race, and school-level socioeconomic status (SES). Correlations examined associations between FNPA scores and several BMI indicators. Logistic and linear regression analyses evaluated the construct validity of the FNPA in both groups. Mean FNPA score differed by age group, by SES in both age groups, and by race in the first grade sample only. Correlations between FNPA score and BMI indicators were higher in the first grade sample, but SES was significantly associated with BMI only in tenth graders. The FNPA has stronger utility in younger children, while school SES is a stronger predictor of adolescent weight status. View Full-Text
Keywords: Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool; obesity risk factors; socioeconomic status; youth and adolescence Family Nutrition and Physical Activity screening tool; obesity risk factors; socioeconomic status; youth and adolescence
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Peyer, K.L.; Welk, G.J. Construct Validity of an Obesity Risk Screening Tool in Two Age Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 419.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top