Next Article in Journal
Relationships between Vacant Homes and Food Swamps: A Longitudinal Study of an Urban Food Environment
Next Article in Special Issue
Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Consumption and Economic Growth: A Panel Cointegration Analysis for 16 Asian Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Cross-Sectional Serological Survey for Leptospira spp. in Beef and Dairy Cattle in Two Districts in Uganda
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual Competing Photovoltaic Supply Chains: A Social Welfare Maximization Perspective
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(11), 1423; doi:10.3390/ijerph14111423

Towards More Nuanced Classification of NGOs and Their Services to Improve Integrated Planning across Disaster Phases

RAND Corporation, 1200 S. Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 October 2017 / Revised: 16 November 2017 / Accepted: 17 November 2017 / Published: 21 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [461 KB, uploaded 21 November 2017]   |  


Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are being integrated into U.S. strategies to expand the services that are available during health security threats like disasters. Identifying better ways to classify NGOs and their services could optimize disaster planning. We surveyed NGOs about the types of services they provided during different disaster phases. Survey responses were used to categorize NGO services as core—critical to fulfilling their organizational mission—or adaptive—services implemented during a disaster based on community need. We also classified NGOs as being core or adaptive types of organizations by calculating the percentage of each NGO’s services classified as core. Service types classified as core were mainly social services, while adaptive service types were those typically relied upon during disasters (e.g., warehousing, food services, etc.). In total, 120 NGOs were classified as core organizations, meaning they mainly provided the same services across disaster phases, while 100 NGOs were adaptive organizations, meaning their services changed. Adaptive NGOs were eight times more likely to report routinely participating in disaster planning as compared to core NGOs. One reason for this association may be that adaptive NGOs are more aware of the changing needs in their communities across disaster phases because of their involvement in disaster planning. View Full-Text
Keywords: disaster planning; nongovernmental organizations; disaster recovery; health security disaster planning; nongovernmental organizations; disaster recovery; health security

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Towe, V.L.; Acosta, J.D.; Chandra, A. Towards More Nuanced Classification of NGOs and Their Services to Improve Integrated Planning across Disaster Phases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1423.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top