Next Article in Journal
The MARINA Risk Assessment Strategy: A Flexible Strategy for Efficient Information Collection and Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
The Associations of Job Stress and Organizational Identification with Job Satisfaction among Chinese Police Officers: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Acclimatization in Weather-Related Human Mortality During the Transition Seasons of Autumn and Spring in a Thermally Extreme Mid-Latitude Continental Climate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Associated with Job Satisfaction among University Teachers in Northeastern Region of China: A Cross-Sectional Study
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(12), 14988-15006; doi:10.3390/ijerph121214958

Quality of Work: Validation of a New Instrument in Three Languages

1
Institute for Health and Behavior, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette L-4365, Luxembourg
2
Department of Social Psychology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena 07743, Germany
3
Department of Business Psychology, University of Trier, Trier 54286, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Cary Cooper
Received: 23 September 2015 / Revised: 10 November 2015 / Accepted: 19 November 2015 / Published: 26 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Occupational Stress, Human Health and Wellbeing)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [240 KB, uploaded 26 November 2015]

Abstract

Introduction and objective: A new instrument to measure quality of work was developed in three languages (German, French and Luxembourgish) and validated in a study of employees working in Luxembourg. Methods and results: A representative sample (n = 1529) was taken and exploratory factor analysis revealed a six-factor solution for the 21-item instrument (satisfaction and respect, mobbing, mental strain at work, cooperation, communication and feedback, and appraisal). Reliability analysis showed satisfying reliability for all six factors and the total questionnaire. In order to examine the construct validity of the new instrument, regression analyses were conducted to test whether the instrument predicted work characteristics’ influence on three components of well-being—burnout, psychological stress and maladaptive coping behaviors. Conclusion: The present validation offers a trilingual inventory for measuring quality of work that may be used, for example, as an assessment tool or for testing the effectiveness of interventions. View Full-Text
Keywords: quality of work; new questionnaire; well-being quality of work; new questionnaire; well-being
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Steffgen, G.; Kohl, D.; Reese, G.; Happ, C.; Sischka, P. Quality of Work: Validation of a New Instrument in Three Languages. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 14988-15006.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top