Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Offspring DNA Methylation across the Lifecourse Associated with Prenatal Maternal Smoking Using Bayesian Mixture Modelling
Next Article in Special Issue
Adult Lifespan Cognitive Variability in the Cross-Sectional Cam-CAN Cohort
Previous Article in Journal
Coping with Workplace Violence in Healthcare Settings: Social Support and Strategies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aging, Emotion, Attention, and Binding in the Taboo Stroop Task: Data and Theories
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(11), 14445-14460; doi:10.3390/ijerph121114445

Proofreading in Young and Older Adults: The Effect of Error Category and Comprehension Difficulty

Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EB, UK
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Received: 30 June 2015 / Revised: 4 November 2015 / Accepted: 4 November 2015 / Published: 13 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Aging and Cognition)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [846 KB, uploaded 13 November 2015]   |  

Abstract

Proofreading text relies on stored knowledge, language processing, and attentional resources. Age differentially affects these constituent abilities: while older adults maintain word knowledge and most aspects of language comprehension, language production and attention capacity are impaired with age. Research with young adults demonstrates that proofreading is more attentionally-demanding for contextual errors which require integration across multiple words compared to noncontextual errors which occur within a single word. Proofreading is also more attentionally-demanding for text which is more difficult to comprehend compared to easier text. Older adults may therefore be impaired at aspects of proofreading which require production, contextual errors, or more difficult text. The current study tested these possibilities using a naturalistic proofreading task. Twenty-four young and 24 older adults proofread noncontextual (spelling) and contextual (grammar or meaning) errors in passages that were easier or more difficult to comprehend. Older adults were preserved at proofreading spelling errors, but were impaired relative to young adults when proofreading grammar or meaning errors, especially for difficult passages. Additionally, older adults were relatively spared at detecting errors compared to correcting spelling errors, in keeping with previous research. Age differences were not attributable to individual differences in vocabulary knowledge or self-reported spelling ability. View Full-Text
Keywords: aging; reading; proofreading; error detection; spelling; grammar; verb agreement; semantic errors; semantic illusions; antonyms aging; reading; proofreading; error detection; spelling; grammar; verb agreement; semantic errors; semantic illusions; antonyms
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shafto, M.A. Proofreading in Young and Older Adults: The Effect of Error Category and Comprehension Difficulty. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 14445-14460.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top