Next Article in Journal
Effects of Partially Ionised Medical Oxygen, Especially with O2, in Vibration White Finger Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation of a Framework for Measuring Hospital Disaster Resilience Using Factor Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Prevention of Adolescent Depression in the Spanish-Speaking World
Previous Article in Special Issue
Flood Disaster Risk Assessment of Rural Housings — A Case Study of Kouqian Town in China
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(6), 5684-5697; doi:10.3390/ijerph110605684
Article

Engaging a Chemical Disaster Community: Lessons from Graniteville

1,†
, 2,†,* , 3
, 4
, 5
, 6
, 7
, 2 and 8,†
Received: 13 February 2014; in revised form: 25 April 2014 / Accepted: 21 May 2014 / Published: 27 May 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparedness and Emergency Response)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [225 KB, uploaded 19 June 2014]
Abstract: Community engagement remains a primary objective of public health practice. While this approach has been adopted with success in response to many community health issues, it is rarely adopted in chemical disaster response. Empirical research suggests that management of chemical disasters focuses on the emergency response with almost no community engagement for long-term recovery. Graniteville, an unincorporated and medically underserved community in South Carolina was the site of one of the largest chlorine exposures by a general US population. Following the immediate response, we sought community participation and partnered with community stakeholders and representatives in order to address community-identified health and environmental concerns. Subsequently, we engaged the community through regular town hall meetings, harnessing community capacity, forming coalitions with existing local assets like churches, schools, health centers, and businesses, and hosting community-wide events like health picnics and screenings. Information obtained from these events through discussions, interviews, and surveys facilitated focused public health service which eventually transitioned to community-driven public health research. Specific outcomes of the community engagement efforts and steps taken to ensure sustainability of these efforts and outcomes will be discussed.
Keywords: community engagement; community health partnerships; chemical disasters; community-based participatory service; community-based participatory research; environmental health; sustainability community engagement; community health partnerships; chemical disasters; community-based participatory service; community-based participatory research; environmental health; sustainability
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Export to BibTeX |
EndNote


MDPI and ACS Style

Abara, W.; Wilson, S.; Vena, J.; Sanders, L.; Bevington, T.; Culley, J.M.; Annang, L.; Dalemarre, L.; Svendsen, E. Engaging a Chemical Disaster Community: Lessons from Graniteville. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 5684-5697.

AMA Style

Abara W, Wilson S, Vena J, Sanders L, Bevington T, Culley JM, Annang L, Dalemarre L, Svendsen E. Engaging a Chemical Disaster Community: Lessons from Graniteville. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(6):5684-5697.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abara, Winston; Wilson, Sacoby; Vena, John; Sanders, Louisiana; Bevington, Tina; Culley, Joan M.; Annang, Lucy; Dalemarre, Laura; Svendsen, Erik. 2014. "Engaging a Chemical Disaster Community: Lessons from Graniteville." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11, no. 6: 5684-5697.


Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert