Next Article in Journal
Smoke-Free Homes and Home Exposure to Secondhand Smoke in Shanghai, China
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of the FIFA 11+ Training Program on Injury Prevention in Football Players: A Systematic Review
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(11), 12001-12014; doi:10.3390/ijerph111112001

A Chemical Risk Ranking and Scoring Method for the Selection of Harmful Substances to be Specially Controlled in Occupational Environments

1
Department of Environmental Health, College of Health Science, Korea University, Seoul 136-703, Korea
2
Occupational Safety & Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency, Ulsan 339-30, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 21 June 2014 / Revised: 11 November 2014 / Accepted: 12 November 2014 / Published: 20 November 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [746 KB, uploaded 20 November 2014]   |  

Abstract

This study aimed to devise a method for prioritizing hazardous chemicals for further regulatory action. To accomplish this objective, we chose appropriate indicators and algorithms. Nine indicators from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals were used to identify categories to which the authors assigned numerical scores. Exposure indicators included handling volume, distribution, and exposure level. To test the method devised by this study, sixty-two harmful substances controlled by the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Korea, including acrylamide, acrylonitrile, and styrene were ranked using this proposed method. The correlation coefficients between total score and each indicator ranged from 0.160 to 0.641, and those between total score and hazard indicators ranged from 0.603 to 0.641. The latter were higher than the correlation coefficients between total score and exposure indicators, which ranged from 0.160 to 0.421. Correlations between individual indicators were low (−0.240 to 0.376), except for those between handling volume and distribution (0.613), suggesting that each indicator was not strongly correlated. The low correlations between each indicator mean that the indicators and independent and were well chosen for prioritizing harmful chemicals. This method proposed by this study can improve the cost efficiency of chemical management as utilized in occupational regulatory systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: risk ranking; scoring method; occupational environment; chemical management risk ranking; scoring method; occupational environment; chemical management
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, S.; Moon, H.-I.; Lee, K.S.; Hong, M.K.; Byeon, S.-H. A Chemical Risk Ranking and Scoring Method for the Selection of Harmful Substances to be Specially Controlled in Occupational Environments. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 12001-12014.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top