Next Article in Journal
Radon Concentrations in Drinking Water in Beijing City, China and Contribution to Radiation Dose
Previous Article in Journal
A Two-Stage Approach for Medical Supplies Intermodal Transportation in Large-Scale Disaster Responses
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(11), 11110-11120; doi:10.3390/ijerph111111110

Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human–Companion Animal Bond

1
GKT Enterprise, PC. Lake Oswego, OR 97035, USA
2
School of Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Langford BS40 5DU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 1 September 2014 / Revised: 15 October 2014 / Accepted: 16 October 2014 / Published: 27 October 2014
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [618 KB, uploaded 28 October 2014]   |  

Abstract

“One Health”, also called “One Medicine”, began as an initiative advocating greater integration of human and animal medicine, in the 1800s. This concept has recently come to prominence, driven by the recognition that 75% of the newly emerging infectious diseases will arise from animal reservoirs, and that successful control and prevention will require a coordinated human medical and veterinary approach. Consequently, many One Health discussions have centered on the surveillance of animals in order to anticipate the potential emergence of new zoonotic diseases. An area that has been given only cursory mention, are the many ways that small companion animals benefit individual, community and possibly world health. The goal of this paper is to briefly review some of the evidenced-based data concerning the benefits of having companion animals in our lives, focusing on four major areas; cancer, heart disease, autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and the potential positive economic effects of the human-companion animal bond on One Health. Heart disease and cancer are the two leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the world, while ASD is a growing concern, not only for its individual effects, but also for its effect on family units, educational institutions, and its social implications for the community. In addition, these diseases can greatly affect the national and global cost of healthcare, as well as the economic output of a nation. It is therefore important to include and build on the concept of the Human-Animal Bond (HAB) as it relates to healthcare in these areas. View Full-Text
Keywords: human–companion animal ; one health; pets; animal-assisted therapy; dogs; heart disease; cancer; autism; public health human–companion animal ; one health; pets; animal-assisted therapy; dogs; heart disease; cancer; autism; public health
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Takashima, G.K.; Day, M.J. Setting the One Health Agenda and the Human–Companion Animal Bond. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 11110-11120.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top