Next Article in Journal
Marine Sponge Dysidea herbacea revisited: Another Brominated Diphenyl Ether
Previous Article in Journal
Natural Abundance 14C Content of Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP) from Three Marine Algae
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Amphidinolides B4 and B5, Potent Cytotoxic 26-Membered Macrolides from Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species

by
Masashi Tsuda
1,
Yuuko Kariya
1,
Rie Iwamoto
1,
Eri Fukushi
2,
Jun Kawabata
2 and
Jun’ichi Kobayashi
1,*
1
Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan
2
Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2005, 3(1), 1-8; https://doi.org/10.3390/md301001
Submission received: 6 January 2005 / Accepted: 19 February 2005 / Published: 1 March 2005

Abstract

:
Two new cytotoxic 26-membered macrolides, amphidinolides B4 (1) and B5 (2), have been isolated from a marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. (strain Y-100), and the structures were elucidated on the basis of detailed analyses of 2D NMR data including 13C–13C correlations.

Introduction

Amphidinolides are a series of unique cytotoxic macrolides isolated from dinoflagellates Amphidinium species, which were separated from marine acoel flatworms Amphiscolops species [1]. The 26- or 27-membered macrolides, which were represented by amphidinolides B (3) and H (4) [27], possess unique structural features such as an allyl epoxide and vicinally located one-carbon branches, and exhibit potent cytotoxicity against tumor cell lines. From our previous studies, the presence of an allyl epoxide, an S-cis-diene moiety, and the ketone at C-20 in 3 and 4 was indicated to be important for the cytotoxicity of amphidinolide H-type macrolides [7]. More recently, it was indicated that one of the mechanism of action for the potent cytotoxicity of 4 was due to bind to actin covalently [8]. During our continuing search for bioactive metabolites from marine dinoflagellates, two new amphidinolide B-type macrolides, amphidinolides B4 (1) and B5 (2), have been isolated from a marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium species (strain Y-100). In this paper, we describe the isolation, structure elucidation, and cytotoxicity of 1 and 2.
Marinedrugs 03 00001f3

Results and Discussion

The dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. (strain Y-100) was isolated from a marine acoel flatworm Amphiscolops sp. collected off Ma’eda Cape, Okinawa, and mass cultured unialgally at 25 °C for 2 weeks in a seawater medium enriched with 1% Provasoli’s Erd-Schreiber (ES) supplement and 1% NaH13CO3. The mass cultured algal cells (60.5 g, wet weight) obtained from 30 L of culture were extracted with MeOH/toluene (3:1), and the extracts were partitioned between toluene and 1M NaCl aq. The toluene soluble materials were subjected to a silica gel column followed by SiO2 and/or C18 HPLC to afford amphidinolides B4 (1, 0.0008 %, wet weight) and B5 (2, 0.0002 %) together with known related macrolides, amphidinolides B [24], (3, 0.0016 %), C [9,10] (0.0025 %), and T1 [1113] (0.0028 %).
Amphidinolide B4 {1, [α]D23 −13° (c 0.2, CHCl3)} showed the pseudomolecular ion peak at m/z 569.5 (M+Na)+ in the ESIMS spectrum, and the 13C-enrichment was estimated as 32% by the pattern of the pseudomolecular ion peak. The molecular formula of C32H50O8 was revealed on the basis of HRESIMS data [m/z 569.3467 (M+Na)+, Δ +1.3 mmu]. The 1H NMR spectrum of 1 was similar to that of amphidinolide B (3). The 13C NMR data (Table 1) of 1 revealed total 32 carbon signals due to a ketone, an ester carbonyl, three sp2 quaternary carbons, four sp2 methines, an sp2 methylene, nine sp3 methines consisting of six oxygenated ones, seven sp3 methylenes, and six methyls. Detailed analyses of the HMQC and INADEQUATE spectra of 1 established the carbon chain from C-1 to C-26 and six C1 branches including five methyls (C-27, C-28, C-30, C-3, and C-32) and an exomethylene (C-29). The relatively lower-field resonance of H-25 (δH 5.08) indicated that C-25 was involved in an ester linkage with C-1. This was supported by HMBC correlations for H-3/C-1, H3-27/C-1, and H-25/C-1. Thus, the gross structure of amphidinolide B4 was assigned as 1.
The relative stereochemistry of 1 was deduced from detailed comparison of the 13C NMR data (Table 1) of 1 with those of amphidinolides B (3), H (4), H2 (5), and H3 (6). The 13C chemical shifts for C-1 ~ C-13 part with two methyls (C-27 and C-28), and an exomethlene (C-29) of 1 corresponded well to those of 3 ~ 5, and the 13C chemical shifts for C-20 ~ C-26 and C-32 of 1 were also close to those of 4 and 5, suggesting that the relative stereochemistry for these parts of 1 might be common to that of amphidinolides B (3), H (4), and H2 (5). On the other hand, the 13C NMR data of the corresponding portion of amphidinolide H3 (6) were different from those of 1, while the 13C NMR data for C-14 ~ C-23 and C-28, C-29, C-31 of 1 were similar to those for the corresponding parts of amphidinolide H (4) rather than those of amphidinolide H2 (5) as shown in Figure 1. The chemical shifts for C-18 (δC 67.4), C-19 (δC 45.1), and C-30 (δC 13.1) of 1; those of 4 (C-18: δC 67.5, C-19: δC 45.2, and C-30: δC 13.2); those of 5 (C-18: δC 65.9, C-19: δC 43.8, and C-30: δC 12.3). The 1H-1H coupling constants for H-18/H-19a (8.2 Hz) and H-18/H-19b (small) of 1 resembled those of 4 (H-18/H-19b: 8.5 Hz and H-18/H-19b: 1.8 Hz), while those for H-18/H-19a (2.6 Hz) and H-18/H-19b (9.8 Hz) of 5 were different from those of 1. These observations indicated the possibility that the relative stereochemistry of nine chiral centers in 1 might be the same as that in 4. The CD spectrum [λext 262 (Δɛ +0.1) and 235 nm (−0.22)] of 1 was similar to those of 4ext 261 (Δɛ +0.1) and 235 nm (−0.15)]. Considering the biosynthetical relationship among 1 and amphidinolides B (3) and H (4), the absolute configurations of 1 were elucidated to be the same as those of 3 and 4. Thus, amphidinolide B4 (1) was assigned as 16-deoxy form of amphidinolide B (3).
Amphidinolide B5 {2, [α]D23 −25° (c 0.2, CHCl3)} was elucidated to have the same molecular formula, C32H50O8, as 1. Profiles of the 1H and 13C NMR (Table 1) spectra of 2 were reminiscent of those of 1. The gross structure of 2 was elucidated to be the same as that of 1 from analyses of the HMQC, HMBC, and INADEQUATE spectra. The relative stereochemistry of 2 was deduced from comparison of the carbon chemical shifts with those of 3, 4, and 5 as follows. The 13C chemical shifts for C-1 ~ C-13 and C-27 ~C-29 of 2 were similar to those of 3 ~ 5. The 13C NMR data for C-1 ~ C-23 and C-27 ~ C-32 of 2 were closer to those of 5 than those of 4 (Figure 2), indicating that the relative stereochemistry of this part in 2 was the same as that of the corresponding part in 5. The chemical shifts for C-18 (δC 65.9), C-19 (δC 43.9), and C-30 (δC 12.3) of 2 corresponded well to those of 5 (C-18: δC 65.9, C-19: δC 43.8, and C-30: δC 12.3), while those of 2 were slightly different from those of 4. The absolute configurations of 2 were elucidated to be the same as those of 5, since the CD spectrum of 2ext 262 (Δɛ +0.16) and 220 nm (0)] was quite similar to that of 5ext 262 (Δɛ +0.17) and 221 nm (0)]. Thus, amphidinolide B5 (2) was assigned as 26-deoxy form of amphidinolide H2 (5) or 16-deoxy-16,18-epi form of amphidinolide B (3).
Amphidinolides B4 (1) and B5 (2) exhibited potent cytotoxicity against murine lymphoma L1210 (IC50: 0.00012 and 0.0014 μg/mL, respectively) and human epidermoid carcinoma KB cells (IC50: 0.001 and 0.004 μg/mL, respectively).

Experimental

General

The IR and UV spectra were taken on a FT/IR-5300 and a UV-1600PC spectrophotometers, respectively. NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AMX-600 spectrometer. Positive-mode ESI mass spectra were obtained on a JEOL JMS-700TZ spectrmeter.

Cultivation and Isolation

The dinoflagellate Amphidinium species (strain number Y-100) was separated from inside cells of a marine acoel flatworm Amphiscolops species, which was collected off Ma’eda Cape, Okinawa. The dinoflagellate was unialgally cultured at 25 °C for two weeks in seawater medium enriched with 1% ES supplement, 16 h light and 8 h dark. The harvested cells (60.5 g, wet weight, from 30 L of culture) were extracted with MeOH/toluene (3:1, 200 mL × 3). After addition of 1 M NaCl aq. (100 L), the mixture was extracted with toluene (100 mL × 3). The toluene-soluble fractions (730 mg) were subjected to a silica gel column (CHCl3/MeOH, 98:2) to afford a macrolide-containing fraction, which was separated with a Sep-Pak cartridge C18 (MeOH/H2O, 8:2) followed by C18 HPLC [YMC-Pack Pro C18, 5 μm, YMC Co., Ltd., 10 × 250 mm; eluent, CH3CN/H2O (75:25); flow rate, 3 mL/min; UV detection at 210 nm] to give amphidinolides B4 (1, 0.42 mg, 0.0008 %, wet weight, tR 23.9 min) and B5 (2, 0.10 mg, 0.0002 %, tR 27 min) together with amphidinolide B (3, 0.23 mg, 0.0005 mg). Amphidinolides C (0.0025 %) and T1 (0.0028 %) were isolated from another fraction.
Amphidinolide B4 (1): colorless oil; [α]23D −13° (c 0.2, CHCl3); UV (EtOH) λmax 209 nm (ɛ 6800); IR (neat) νmax 3436, 2956 and 1704 cm−1; CD (EtOH) λext 262 (Δɛ +0.1) and 235 nm (−0.22); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.85 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H3-28), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-32), 1.06 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-31), 1.15 (1H, m, H-10), 1.20 (1H, m, H-24), 1.24 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-26), 1.42 (1H, m, H-17), 1.48 (1H, m, H-10), 1.56 (1H, m, H-11), 1.71 (3H, s, H3-30), 1.82 (3H, s, H3-27), 1.84 ~ 1.92 (3H, m, H-12, H-17, and H-23), 2.05 ~ 2.16 (3H, m, H-5, H-12, and H-24), 2.18 ~ 2.28 (2H, m, H-4 and H-16), 2.34 (1H, m, H-5), 2.42 (1H, m, H-4), 2.61 (1H, brd, J = 16.0 Hz, H-19), 2.74 (1H, dd, J = 8.9 and 16.0 Hz, H-19), 2.94 (1H, brd, J = 9.7 Hz, H-9), 3.14 (1H, brd, J = 8.0 Hz, H-8), 3.27 (1H, brs, OH), 3.55 (1H, brs, OH), 3.71 (1H, m, H-22), 3.86 (1H, brs, OH), 3.92 (1H, m, H-18), 4.31 (1H, brs, H-21), 4.81 (1H, s, H-29), 4.97 (1H, s, H-29), 5.08 (1H, m, H-25), 5.16 (1H, dd, J = 15.6 and 8.2 Hz, H-7), 5.56 (1H, s, H-14), 5.89 (1H, m, H-6), and 6.73 (1H, m, H-3); 13C NMR (Table 1); (+)-ESIMS m/z 569 ([M+Na]+, 6%), 570 (7%), 571 (11%), 572 (19%), 573 (32%), 574 (48%), 575 (64%), 576 (77%), 577 (87%), 578 (100%), 579 (96%), 580 (92%), 581 (86%), 582 (76%), 583 (64%), 584 (51%), 585 (41%), 586 (31%), 587 (25%), 588 (18%), 589 (14%), 590 (12%), 591 (13%), and 592 (12%); (+)-HRESIMS m/z 569.3467 (C32H50O7Na require (M+Na)+, 569.3454).
Amphidinolide B5 (2): colorless oil; [α]D −25° (c 0.2, CHCl3); UV (EtOH) λmax 209 nm (ɛ 6800); IR (neat) νmax 3740, 2923, and 1706 cm−1; CD (EtOH) λext 262 (Δɛ +0.16) and 220 nm (0); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 0.86 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz, H3-28), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-32), 0.98 (1H, m, H-10), 1.05 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-31), 1.28 (1H, m, H-24), 1.28 (3H, d, J = 6.7 Hz, H3-26), 1.45 (1H, m, H-17), 1.59 (1H, m, H-11), 1.64 (1H, m, H-11), 1.70 (1H, m, H-10), 1.71 (3H, s, H3-30), 1.82 (3H, s, H3-27), 1.82 (1H, m, H-17), 1.91 (1H, m, H-19), 2.05 (1H, m, H-24), 2.12 (1H, m, H-5), .2.22 ~ 2.40 (4H, m, H-4, H-5, H-12, and H-16), 2.45 (1H, m, H-4), 2.53 (1H, dd, J = 9.8 and 16.0 Hz, H-19), 2.97 (1H, brd, J = 9.7 Hz, H-9), 3.06 (1H, brd, J = 8.0 Hz, H-8), 3.09 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, H-19), 3.57 (1H, m, H-22), 3.60 ~ 3.75 (3H, brs, OH × 3), 4.09 (1H, m, H-18), 4.22 (1H, brs, H-21), 4.80 (1H, s, H-29), 4.96 (1H, s, H-29), 5.09 (1H, m, H-25), 5.22 (1H, dd, J = 15.6 and 8.2 Hz, H-7), 5.56 (1H, s, H-14), 5.87 (1H, m, H-6), and 6.73 (1H, m, H-3); 13C NMR (Table 1); (+)-ESIMS m/z 569 ([M+Na]+, 6%), 570 (7%), 571 (11%), 572 (19%), 573 (32%), 574 (48%), 575 (64%), 576 (77%), 577 (87%), 578 (100%), 579 (96%), 580 (92%), 581 (86%), 582 (76%), 583 (64%), 584 (51%), 585 (41%), 586 (31%), 587 (25%), 588 (18%), 589 (14%), 590 (12%), 591 (13%), and 592 (12%); (+)-HRESIMS m/z 569.3448 (C32H50O7Na require (M+Na)+, 569.3454).
Figure 1. Chemical shift differences between amphidinolides B4 (1) and H (4: frame) or H2 (5: solid).
Figure 1. Chemical shift differences between amphidinolides B4 (1) and H (4: frame) or H2 (5: solid).
Marinedrugs 03 00001f1
Figure 2. Chemical shift diferences between amphidinolides B5 (2) and H (4: frame) or H2 (5: solid).
Figure 2. Chemical shift diferences between amphidinolides B5 (2) and H (4: frame) or H2 (5: solid).
Marinedrugs 03 00001f2
Table 1. 13C NMR Data of Amphidinolides B4 (1), B5 (2), B (3), H (4), H2 (5), and H3 (6) in CDCl3.
Table 1. 13C NMR Data of Amphidinolides B4 (1), B5 (2), B (3), H (4), H2 (5), and H3 (6) in CDCl3.
positn123456
1167.8167.8167.7168.7168.9168.8
2128.5128.1128.3127.9127.6128.1
3139.8139.4139.9141.0140.8140.7
426.826.926.827.026.926.8
531.231.030.830.931.030.7
6135.9136.1135.4135.7136.1136.1
7128.7129.7128.5128.6129.7127.9
860.660.160.060.360.160.5
959.559.959.359.559.859.7
1039.840.439.439.840.439.6
1129.429.929.129.129.829.3
1247.146.746.747.146.647.1
13144.2144.3144.4144.1144.3143.9
14126.5126.6124.3126.1126.7125.8
15141.7140.6143.1141.7140.6141.5
1640.940.975.940.740.840.9
1740.840.245.240.940.240.8
1867.465.966.567.565.967.1
1945.143.945.945.243.846.6
20212.9212.0212.4212.2211.3215.1
2177.978.877.777.778.477.0
2275.876.375.575.476.277.2
2333.232.933.233.032.330.1
2439.239.439.333.533.930.2
2568.373.468.373.473.373.7
2621.221.221.066.166.666.4
2712.412.512.412.612.712.6
2818.019.518.218.019.518.2
29114.8114.9114.8114.7115.0114.8
3013.112.315.613.212.312.8
3120.520.228.320.320.420.8
3215.815.215.015.615.116.2

Acknowledgments

We thank Mr. A. Masuda, Yanmar Co., Ltd., for help with dinoflagellate collection, Ms. Y. Fukuda for assistance of dinoflagellate cultivation, and Ms. S. Oka, Center for Instrumental Analysis, Hokkaido University, for ESIMS measurements. This work was partly supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan.
  • Sample availability: Not available.

Reference and Notes

  1. Kobayashi, J.; Tsuda, M. Amphidinolides, bioactive macrolides from symbiotic marine dinoflagellates. Nat. Prod. Rep 2004, 21, 1–18, and references cited therein.. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ishibashi, M.; Ohizumi, Y.; Hamashima, M.; Nakamura, H.; Hirata, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolide-B, a novel macrolide with potent antineoplastic activity from the marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1987, 1127–1129. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kobayashi, J.; Ishibashi, M.; Nakamura, H.; Ohizumi, Y.; Yamasu, T.; Hirata, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Ohta, T.; Nozoe, S. Antineoplastic macrolides from the cultured dinoflagellate of the genus Amphidinium sp. J. Nat. Prod 1989, 52, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bauer, I.; Maranda, L.; Shimizu, Y.; Peterson, R. W.; Cornell, L.; Steiner, J. R.; Clardy, J. The structures of amphidinolide B isomers: strongly cytotoxic macrolides produced by a free-swimming dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 2657–2658. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kobayashi, J.; Shigemori, H.; Ishibashi, M.; Yamasu, T.; Hirota, H.; Sasaki, T. Amphidinolides G and H: New potent cytotoxic macrolides from the cultured symbiotic dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Org. Chem 1991, 56, 5221–5224. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kobayashi, J.; Shimbo, K.; Sato, M.; Shiro, M.; Tsuda, M. Absolute stereochemistry of amphidinolides G and H. Org. Lett 2000, 2, 2805–2807. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kobayashi, J.; Shimbo, K.; Sato, M.; Tsuda, M. Amphidinolides H2 ~ H5, G2, and G3, New Cytotoxic 26- and 27-Membered Macrolides from Dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Org. Chem 2002, 67, 6585–6592. [Google Scholar]
  8. Usui, T.; Kazami, S.; Dohmae, N.; Mashimo, Y.; Kondo, H.; Tsuda, M.; Terasaki, G. A.; Ohashi, K.; Kobayashi, J.; Osada, H. Amphidinolide H, a potent cytotoxic macrolide, covalently binds on actin subdomain 4 and stabilizes actin filament. Chemistry & Biology 2004, 11, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar]
  9. Kobayashi, J.; Ishibashi, M.; Wälchli, M. R.; Nakamura, H.; Hirata, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Ohizumi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1988, 110, 490–494.
  10. Kubota, T.; Tsuda, M.; Kobayashi. Absolute stereochemistry of amphidinolide C. Org. Lett 2001, 3, 1363–1366. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsuda, M.; Endo, T.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolide T, novel 19-membered macrolide from marine dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. J. Org. Chem 2000, 65, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar]
  12. Tsuda, M.; Endo, T.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolides T2, T3, and T4, new 19-menbered macrolides from dinoflagellate Amphidinium sp. and biosynthesis of amphidinolide T1. J. Org. Chem 2000, 65, 1349–1352. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kubota, T.; Endo, T.; Tsuda, M.; Shiro, M.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolide T5, a new 19-membered macrolide from a dinoflagellate and X-ray structure of amphidinolide T1. Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 6175–6179. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsuda, M.; Kariya, Y.; Iwamoto, R.; Fukushi, E.; Kawabata, J.; Kobayashi, J. Amphidinolides B4 and B5, Potent Cytotoxic 26-Membered Macrolides from Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. Mar. Drugs 2005, 3, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/md301001

AMA Style

Tsuda M, Kariya Y, Iwamoto R, Fukushi E, Kawabata J, Kobayashi J. Amphidinolides B4 and B5, Potent Cytotoxic 26-Membered Macrolides from Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species. Marine Drugs. 2005; 3(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/md301001

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsuda, Masashi, Yuuko Kariya, Rie Iwamoto, Eri Fukushi, Jun Kawabata, and Jun’ichi Kobayashi. 2005. "Amphidinolides B4 and B5, Potent Cytotoxic 26-Membered Macrolides from Dinoflagellate Amphidinium Species" Marine Drugs 3, no. 1: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3390/md301001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop