Next Article in Journal
Gas Flow to Enhance the Detection of Alpha-Induced Air Radioluminescence Based on a UVTron Flame Sensor
Next Article in Special Issue
Elastic MCF Rubber with Photovoltaics and Sensing on Hybrid Skin (H-Skin) for Artificial Skin by Utilizing Natural Rubber: 2nd Report on the Effect of Tension and Compression on the Hybrid Photo- and Piezo-Electricity Properties in Wet-Type Solar Cell Rubber
Previous Article in Journal
An Image Focusing Method for Sparsity-Driven Radar Imaging of Rotating Targets
Previous Article in Special Issue
Integrated Method for Personal Thermal Comfort Assessment and Optimization through Users’ Feedback, IoT and Machine Learning: A Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elastic MCF Rubber with Photovoltaics and Sensing for Use as Artificial or Hybrid Skin (H-Skin): 1st Report on Dry-Type Solar Cell Rubber with Piezoelectricity for Compressive Sensing

Faculty of Symbiotic Systems Sciences, Fukushima University, 1 Kanayagawa, Fukushima 960-1296, Japan
Sensors 2018, 18(6), 1841; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061841
Submission received: 12 April 2018 / Revised: 3 June 2018 / Accepted: 3 June 2018 / Published: 5 June 2018

Abstract

:
Ordinary solar cells are very difficult to bend, squash by compression, or extend by tensile strength. However, if they were to possess elastic, flexible, and extensible properties, in addition to piezo-electricity and resistivity, they could be put to effective use as artificial skin installed over human-like robots or humanoids. Further, it could serve as a husk that generates electric power from solar energy and perceives any force or temperature changes. Therefore, we propose a new type of artificial skin, called hybrid skin (H-Skin), for a humanoid robot having hybrid functions. In this study, a novel elastic solar cell is developed from natural rubber that is electrolytically polymerized with a configuration of magnetic clusters of metal particles incorporated into the rubber, by applying a magnetic field. The material thus produced is named magnetic compound fluid rubber (MCF rubber) that is elastic, flexible, and extensible. The present report deals with a dry-type MCF rubber solar cell that uses photosensitized dye molecules. First, the photovoltaic mechanism in the material is investigated. Next, the changes in the photovoltaic properties of its molecules due to irradiation by visible light are measured under compression. The effect of the compression on its piezoelectric properties is investigated.

1. Introduction

Ordinary solar cells are very difficult to bend, squash by compression, or extend by tensile strength. This is because they are solid-state devices, generally made of silicon systems including nanocrystalline or non-crystalline chemical compounds, or organic polymer films, such as plastic polymers. Recently, studies on flexible solar power generators have attracted attention [1,2,3]; however, they have remained within the realm of solid-state materials, distinct from flexible materials, such as rubber. For example, they have been used to fabricate a thin solid film, even though they have no particular propensity for expansion or compaction in order to be characterized as bending materials; the amount of research on rubber-type solar cells remains limited [4,5].
The effect of rubber properties on simultaneously appearing photovoltaics and piezoelectricity are not yet reported. These effects have been investigated separately. If solar cell materials could be developed with elastic, flexible, and extensible properties, and could also exhibit piezoelectricity, they would be extremely effective for use as artificial skin installed over human-like robots or humanoids. The casing could generate electric power from solar energy and perceive all force or temperature changes. Other varied engineering applications would also become feasible. In addition, such hybrid properties of both photovoltaics and piezoelectricity, or piezoresistivity would not require a power supply or batteries.
This new type of artificial skin, having all the above properties, has been named “hybrid skin (H-Skin)”. Human skin, humanoid skin, or outer layer of robot skin made of artificial material integrated with multiple functionalities of flexibility and sensing modalities to force, temperature and so on, have been termed sensitive skin, smart skin, or electronic skin (E-Skin) [6]. The difference between H-skin and E-Skin is that the former has the functionality of photovoltaics, while the latter does not. Since H-skin also has piezoelectric properties, it can use solar power for self-sensing by utilizing the generated Piezo effect. The novel artificial skin is effective in futuristic applications for humanoid and the outer layer of robot skin. Its fabrication and properties are detailed below.
In the process of development of an elastic solar cell, a new method was used for vulcanizing natural rubber by electrolytic polymerization, together with a configuration of magnetic clusters of metal particles incorporated into the rubber by the application of a magnetic field [7]. This material is named magnetic compound fluid (MCF) rubber, which was reported in a previous study. As for MCF, many engineering applications in dampers and polishing machines have been proposed with MCF as other applications [8], since it is an effective magnetic-responsive intelligent fluid, unlike magnetic fluid (MF) and magneto-rheological fluid (MRF), which were devised in 2001. MCF rubber is not only elastic, flexible, and extensible, but it is also sensitized to piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity [9], where the piezoelectricity is due to the built-in voltage generated in the material due to change in the distance between the ions in the material under compression. The piezoresistivity is attributed to the resistance of the material caused by the change in electric current due to the application of voltage under compression. This mechanism results from the conductivity of the material.
The production methods and power-generation principles of ordinary solid-state solar cells, like photoexcitation based on p- and n-type semiconductors, photosensitized dye molecules and so on, are relevant and effective for the preparation of an elastic and extensible solar cell with rubber. It is not intrinsic semiconductors, but doped semiconductors, which are used for preparing the solar cell. By the doping process, the p- and n-type semiconductors are ionized. The former is an acceptor, A, which is charged negatively by accepting an electron (denoted by A); the latter is donor, D, which is charged positively by giving an electron (denoted by D+). As the MCF rubber has A and D+ ions by electrolytic polymerization, it attains photovoltaic properties, as shown by the electrolytic polymerization reaction in the following section. The photosensitized dye molecules yield two types of MCF rubber solar cells: The dye displays photoexcitation or photoactivity when it is compounded with MCF rubber, which on vulcanization results in arid MCF rubber solar cell (dry type); when the dye seeps into the electrolytically polymerized MCF rubber, the photovoltaics are generated by a redox reaction, then the MCF rubber solar cell is wet (wet type). The former is closer to the concept of a perovskite-type solar cell [10] and is dealt with in this report, while the latter refers to a novel dye-sensitized solar cell [11,12] or Gratzel-type solar cell [13] and will be discussed later. These principles and concepts are useful for the production of the MCF rubber solar cell suggested in this study.
In the present study, the method of production of soft solar MCF rubber having photovoltaic and piezoelectric properties and using a chemical-physical model, was investigated. In the beginning, the principle of generation of photovoltaics in MCF rubber solar cell is described. Next, the photovoltage and current due to photoexcitation, based on p- and n-type semiconductors resulting from the electrolytic polymerization of MCF rubber, by doping or due to the dye, were measured. The effect of compression on the properties of the dry-type MCF rubber solar cell was studied. The photovoltage, photocurrent density, and piezoelectric sensing were measured to ascertain the photovoltaics due to irradiation by visible light under compression.

2. Principle of a Dry-Type MCF Rubber Solar Cell

A compound MF, consisting of other metal particles such as Ni, of size of the order of 1 μm is an MCF, one of the intelligent fluids responsive to a magnetic field. The MCF in the present study is a colloidal fluid composed of 10 nm Fe3O4 particles coated with oleic acid having 5 nm thickness for uniform dispersion because MF consists of Fe3O4 particles coated with oleic acid. Each Fe3O4 particle coated by oleic acid is dispersed in a solvent of water. The configuration of the oleic acid is the same as the one of ordinary magnetic fluid (MF). Due to the hydrophilic group of the oleic acid, whose molecule is easily wetted by water, it is effective for water diffusion. Therefore, MCF rubber liquid has water-based solvent so that the oleic acid is stable in the solvent. We can consider three parts of the MCF rubber solar cell as shown in Figure 1a–c.
The configuration of cross-linked polyisoprene on the electrolytically polymerized MCF rubber, compounded with natural rubber (NR-latex), as shown in Figure 1b [7], was elucidated in a previous study [14]. NR-latex is ordinary rubber with greater elasticity and compressibility, so that the H-Skin conforms to the purpose of the present study [7]. It must be understood that the reactions shown in Figure 1a–c occur at the microscopic level among the particles of Fe3O4 and Ni, and the molecules of polyisoprene, which are dispersed in a water solvent. When a magnetic field is applied, the Fe3O4 particles play a bonding role among the metal particles of Ni, causing numerous Ni and Fe3O4 particles to aggregate into a magnetic cluster of needle-like shapes as shown in Figure 1b [7], which can be ascertained by using the technique of extraction of magnetic clusters from magnetic responsive intelligent fluids, devised in 2003 [15]. The existence of magnetic clusters in the MCF rubber facilitates the development of a solar cell with a bulk-heterojunction of alternating junctions of multi-layered donor and acceptor materials for higher solar cell efficiency, unlike the case of ordinary organic thin-film solar cells in which it is difficult to obtain the configuration.
When the NR-latex compounded with MCF is electrolytically polymerized in a magnetic field applied in the same direction as the electric field lines, the polyisoprene NR-latex molecules align along the magnetic field lines and crosslink each other. This is due to the induced electrochemical reaction occurring around the anode, given by Equation (1), analogous to the chemical analysis by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and so on, and the electrochemical analysis by oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) and pH [14]. On the other hand, the oleic acid and polyisoprene are crosslinked, as shown in Figure 1b, by the electrochemical reaction given by Equation (2), which occurs around the cathode.
Three types of dry-type MCF rubber solar cell were investigated: (A) MCF rubber without photosensitized dye molecules, TiO2 as an electron transport material or KI + I2 (which is mixed by potassium iodide (KI) and iodine (I2)) as an electrolyte, that are commonly used in ordinary dye-sensitized solar cells [11,12]; (B) MCF rubber with just TiO2; and (C) MCF rubber with dye and KI + I2 as well as TiO2. These are based on the following concepts: (A) polyisoprene exhibits photovoltaic effect because C=C bonds display photoexcitation; (B) TiO2 has the role of an n-type semiconductor as a donor, and that the photovoltaic effect of (B) is the one with which the one of (A) is added; (C) the dye undergoes photoexcitation or photoactivity, K+ of KI has the role of an n-type semiconductor as a donor, and iodide/triiodide (I/I3) of KI + I2 plays the role of a p-type semiconductor as an acceptor, and that the photovoltaic effect of (C) is the one with which the ones of (A) and (B) are added. In each of the types (B) and (C), the dye, TiO2, and KI + I2 are compounded in the MCF rubber and electrolytically polymerized to be dried and vulcanized in slightly wetter conditions. In all the types (A), (B), and (C), the solar cell has a cathode of transparent glass coated with a thin TiO2 layer on which the light is incident, similar to an ordinary dye-sensitized solar cell.
Owing to the incident light at the cathode, a reaction is generated as shown in Equations (3a) and (4), respectively. The former is shown in (a-1) at the anode and the latter in (c-1) of Figure 1 at the cathode: at (c-1), the electron is given to the cathode and at (a-1), from the anode. As shown in (a-2) of Figure 1, electrons move away from A and pass through the MCF rubber, corresponding to Equation (3b). The terms in Equations (3) and (4) correspond to those in Equations (1) and (2), respectively: D+Py in Equation (4) corresponds to the right-hand side (RHS) of Equation (2), P, to the first and the fourth terms on the left-hand side (LHS) of Equation (2), and D+, to the second term of the LHS of Equation (2); Py+Ay in Equation (3) corresponds to the first term of the RHS in Equation (1), P, to the first term of the LHS in Equation (1), and A, to the second term of the LHS in Equation (1).
Sensors 18 01841 i001
Sensors 18 01841 i002
[ P y + A y ] x + xye P x + xy   A
xyA A + xye       at   anode   of   solar   cell   side
[ D + P y ] x P x + xy   D + + xye       at   cathode   of   solar   cell   side
Sensors 18 01841 i003
In type (A), A is the negatively ionized polyisoprene P, and polyisoprene is an anion with a radical reaction in the normal state of NR-latex, as shown by Equation (5). In types (B) and (C), A corresponds to P and iodide/triiodide (I/I3); D+ to the ionized TiO2 and K+.
It can be understood from Equations (1), (2), and (5) that the water molecule is a significant component. NR-latex is a water-soluble rubber and an aqueous medium is used for the solar cell with a transparent glass electrode coated with TiO2; hence, the effect of water molecule on a photovoltaics is generated in the MCF rubber solar cell, called the Honda–Fujishima effect [16] designated by Equation (6), with D and A under the catalyst of anionic polyisoprene (as the first term of the RHS in Equation (5)) and radical oleic acid (as Equation (7)). This reaction has been discussed in the field of macromolecular complexes, and because MCF contains metal particles (Ni in the present study), it is similar to a polymer-metal complex. Therefore, the physical interpretation of macromolecular complexes can be assumed according to which the photovoltaic effect of polyisoprene is due to the sequential potential field along C=C bonds, which can be found in other polymer-metal complexes [17]: the path and orientation of the electron-transfer reaction gives rise to the photoexcitation and is defined by a sequential potential field. The electron-transfer reaction is also caused by other sequential potential fields between D and A, as shown by Equations (3), (4), and (6)—the electron can move easily from higher to lower potential.
D + A ( DA ) ( DA ) * ( D + A ) * ( D + A ) D + + A 4 D + + 2 H 2 O 4 D + O 2 + 4 H + 2 A + 2 H 2 O 2 A + H 2 + 2 OH
Sensors 18 01841 i004
This can be explained by using the electron transfer theory in the field of macromolecular complexes. After the dispersion of the particles of Fe3O4 and Ni, and molecules of polyisoprene, the interaction among these is varied. When the distance between them is large, the interaction is comparatively weak and the photovoltaic reaction of Equations (3) and (4) can be considered as an outer-sphere electron transfer reaction (OSETR), which means the structural coordination of molecules is not deformed and only the electrons are transferred by the tunneling effect. In contrast, there can be an inter-sphere electron transfer reaction (ISETR) in the case of a comparatively strong interaction among them due to the following reasons: There is an inherent reaction, as shown by Equation (8) indwelling in Equation (1), where Br is given by Equation (9) and RH by the LHS in Equation (5) [14]. From Equation (8), the anionic isoprene, R, can be considered a bridging ligand and Equation (1) can be considered to be an ISETR, generated on the basis of the interaction of the reactants and mediation of the bridging ligand. On the other hand, Equation (2) is divided into Equations (10) and (11), where anionic oleic acid can be considered a bridging ligand; hence, Equation (2) can be an estimated ISETR. Whether OSETR or ISETR is generated depends on the probability of the distance among the particles of Fe3O4 and Ni, and molecules of polyisoprene—OSETR takes place in the case of long distances and ISETR for smaller ones. As numerous particles and molecules are dispersed in a solvent, many such OSETRs or ISETRs must be taken into account.
  Br + RH Br R ˙ H RBr + H
Sensors 18 01841 i005
Sensors 18 01841 i006
Sensors 18 01841 i007
In type (C), the dye is excited by the incident light and the electron is emitted by the cathode. The ionized dye is reduced by an electron as shown in Equation (12), with sequential reaction as shown in Equation (13). As a result, a photocurrent is generated.
2   Dye + + 2   I 3 2   Dye + 3 I 2       at   cathode   of   solar   cell   side
3 I 2 + 2   e 2   I 3       at   anode   of   solar   cell   side
Meanwhile, before illumination, when a microscopic part of the adjacent particles or molecules, as shown in (b-2) of Figure 1, is viewed, D and A appear to be ionized. A depletion layer area is developed due to the neutralization of the electrons and holes that originated from D and A, respectively; a voltage is generated between D+ and A as built-in voltage and an electric current by the remnants of electrons and holes as built-in current, which is the same phenomenon as that occurring in the case of common piezoelectricity, as shown in (b-3) of Figure 1. The numerous particles of Ni, Fe3O4, and NR-latex, and the molecules of water, acceptor A, and donor D are dispersed in a jumbled state as shown in (b-1) of Figure 1. Finally, the photocurrents, built-in voltage, and current generated by the above-mentioned reactions were measured indicating the possibility of acquiring both photovoltaics and piezo-sensing. This is shown in the following section on experimental results.

3. Materials and Experimental Methods

Figure 2 illustrates the schematics of the production procedure for an MCF rubber solar cell. A 0.2 g n-type semiconductor TiO2 and 0.02 g dye sensitizer MK2 (metal-free solar cell dye, C58H70N2O2S4, Sigma-Aldrich Japan Co. LLC., Shimomeguro, Japan) were compounded with MCF rubber, which consisted of 0.6 g carbonyl Ni powder, with particles on the order of micrometers and bumps on the surface (No. 123, Yamaishi Co., Ltd., Noda, Japan), 0.45 g water-based MF with 40 wt % Fe3O4 (W-40, Ichinen-Chemicals Co., Ltd., Shibaura, Japan), and 1.8 g NR-latex (Rejitex Co., Ltd., Atsugi, Japan). These components were mixed as stated for each type of (A), (B), and (C) viz. A constant electric field was applied at 6 V, and an electric current of 2.7 A was passed between stainless-steel plates with a 1 mm gap for 10 min under atmospheric conditions and application of a 188 mT magnetic field across the liquid. While using MK2, two cases of electrolytic polymerization were considered viz. After electrolytic polymerization without KI + I2, 0.17 g solution KI + I2, compounded with 3.3 g I2 in a solution of 40 g potassium iodide KI, and 60 g water, was poured on one side of the electrolytically polymerized MCF rubber as an electrolyte, and the rubber was electrolytically polymerized again (twice polymerization); MCF rubber was once electrolytically polymerized with KI + I2 (once polymerization).
The final electrolytically polymerized MCF rubber was around 20 mm × 23 mm × 1 mm in size. It was sandwiched between a transparent glass electrode and a TiO2-coated one. Visible light (238 Lux) and ultraviolet light (227 Lux) were scattered on the transparent electrode coated with TiO2. As shown in the bottom left of Figure 2, a weight was applied on one side of the electrode under the incident light. The rod with a diameter of φ8 mm installed the underneath of the weight was attached to the electrode. Voltage and electric current between the electrodes were measured using a digital multi-meter (PC710, Sanwa Co. Ltd., Fukuoka, Japan). The MCF rubber produced using the present procedure of electrolytic polymerization was of dry type because of dehydration to some extent owing to the heat of the electrolytic polymerization, in contrast to an ordinary dye-sensitized solar cell [10,11], where the dye sensitizer and electrolyte are involved in the MCF rubber. Therefore, the present MCF rubber solar cell was different from that in a fluidic state due to the dye and electrolyte being poured on it.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Without Compressing

First, the photovoltaics, without compression, were examined in order to understand the physical mechanism of the MCF rubber solar cell. Figure 3 shows the changes in voltage and electric current density when ultraviolet light was turned on and off, designated by colored arrows in the figure. The data are for types (A) and (B), without MK2 and KI + I2. They exhibited photoelectricity (photovoltage and photocurrent), including built-in electricity (built-in voltage and current). The former was due to a change of start-up voltage or electric current due to incident light and the latter was the initial voltage or electric current. The built-in voltage suggests the occurrence of the piezoelectric effect. In addition, due to the reason described in (b-3) of Figure 1, built-in current also occurred when these were removed initially in some cases of the data of Figure 3. The cause was the integrated data at microscopic part of adjacent particles or molecules, of which the state corresponded to dispersion as shown in (b-1) of Figure 1.
The magnitude of photoelectricity, excluding the built-in electricity, due to irradiation by visible and ultraviolet light is shown in Table 1.
The photoelectricity was very small in the case of electrolytically polymerized NR-latex without the application of magnetic field. Photoexcitation owing to C=C bonds in polyisoprene was very minimal. In contrast, it is clear that the mixture of NR-latex and oleic acid was photovoltaic, whether it was electrolytically polymerized or not, by looking at the case of “Oleic acid, NR-latex”. This was due to the ionized polyisoprene, which (as shown by the second term on the LHS of Equation (1)) played the role of an acceptor-like p-type semiconductor (corresponding to A in (a-1) of Figure 1), and due to the hydrogen ion decomposed from water molecules in NR-latex and MF (see second term in LHS of Equation (2)), which played the role of donor-like n-type semiconductor (corresponding to D+ in (c-1) of Figure 1). Therefore, the NR-latex and oleic acid in MCF rubber produced a photovoltaic effect. In addition, since MF included oleic acid, the mixture of NR-latex and MF was photovoltaic, by looking at the case of “MF, NR-latex”. The results show that oleic acid had a role of catalyst as a bridging ligand on ISETR in the field of macromolecular complex [18], which was the effect of oleic acid on the MCF rubber solar cell.
On the other hand, like the configuration of p- and n-type semiconductors, and the formation technique of organic photoelectric conversion elements in an ordinary solid-state solar cell such as an organic polymer film solar cell, many magnetic clusters indicated by (b) in Figure 1 form the bulk hetero-junction structure. Although the MCF rubber solar cell is a mixture of p- and n-type semiconductors, etc., unlike the layered structure of the components in a solid-state solar cell, the bulk hetero-junction structure exists as shown in (b) in Figure 1. Therefore, focusing on the cases of “MF, NR-latex” and “Ni, MF, NR-latex”, photocurrent density in “mag.” decreased more than that in “no-mag”.
The comparison between the cases of “MF, NR-latex” and “Ni, MF, NR-latex” denotes the effect of metal particle on photoelectricity. There is a possibility that Ni reacts with surface hydroxyl group of oleic acid of MF as in Equation (14). The results that carbonyl group of Ni has a role of catalyst well-known at the field of macromolecular complex [19] provides the effect of Ni on MCF solar cell rubber.
Ni + 2   OH Ni 2 + + 2 O + H 2
In general, TiO2 is most often used in an ordinary dye-sensitized solar cell as an electron transport material [10,11]. The interfacial electron-transfer process of TiO2 in colloidal semiconductor systems has been reported [20]. Therefore, it is understandable that TiO2 affects the photovoltaics, by looking at the case of “MF, NR-latex, TiO2 (2 g)” in Figure 3b.
In the case without electrolytic polymerization, indicated by “No-elec.” in Figure 3, Equations (3a) and (4) are replaced by Equations (15) and (16), respectively.
[ P y + A y ] x P x + xyA      at   anode   of   solar   cell   side
[ D + P y ] x P x + xyD      at   cathode   of   solar   cell   side
In Figure 3, the curves of voltage and electric current density tended to slope downwards gradually when the light is turned off, compared to their trend when it was turned on. This can be explained by using the theoretical formation of the rate of electron-transfer reaction obtained from electron-transfer theory [21]. On the other hand, the tendency of the curves to slope downwards suddenly when the light was “off” and then recover slightly to become constant, in some cases, can be explained by using the long-range electron-transfer theory [22]—it is due to the changes in pH of the MCF rubber solar cell due to change in [H+] and [OH] under the reactions of Equation (1), (2), (5), (6), and (14). When the potential at the particles of Fe3O4 or Ni or molecules of polyisoprene becomes equivalent to that at an adjacent one from the state where their potentials are different, electron transfer is reversed because the electron can move to the orientation of smaller potential. The electron transfer is explained under the state of OSETR.
In addition, the photovoltaic property of the MCF rubber solar cell resulted in a redox reaction as shown by Equations (1)–(4) and (6). The possibility of the above processes can be confirmed in an ordinary dye-sensitized solar cell, such as the Gratzel-type solar cell.
It can be seen from Table 1 that there was an increase in the photoelectricity when oleic acid, MF, or TiO2 were added to NR-latex, during the process of electrolytic polymerization in the magnetic field. It was greater for ultraviolet light than for visible light because TiO2-coated transparent glass reacts with the former: TiO2 is a typical material reactive to ultraviolet light.
Furthermore, the photovoltaic characteristics of the MCF rubber solar cell were investigated by an analysis of the current-potential curves. Figure 4 shows these curves for the types (A) and (B) of the cell without MK2 and KI + I2 under illumination by ultraviolet light, for all the components of Figure 3. They were measured by a potentiostat (HA-151B, Hokuto Denko Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 50-mHz scan rates in the potential domain of −1.5–1.5 V. It can be seen that the electric current changed rapidly at around the largest positive or negative potential for the component “Elec., no-mag., Oleic acid, NR-latex”. This indicates a photodiode property and testified that MCF rubber had this property, derived from the combination of n- and p-type semiconductors corresponding to D and A, respectively, which was previously denoted in Section 2. The photodiode effect can be seen in organic optoelectronic devices [23] and luminescent solar concentrators made of polysiloxane rubber [4]. However, there are few studies on photovoltaics of rubber-state photodiode. Therefore, the results obtained in the present study are of great value.
On the other hand, as seen from all the results of the different components, the swelling of the curves was noticeable. It indicates that there was more photoinduced oxidation and reduction, which was previously denoted in Section 2. As a similar tendency can be seen with photocatalyst TiO2 [24], the reaction previously denoted in Section 2 is validated.
Next, Figure 5 shows the changes in voltage and electric current density when visible and ultraviolet light were turned on and off, designated by colored arrows in the figure for type (C) with MK2 and KI + I2. By doping with the dye sensitizer MK2, the photoelectricity was generated naturally. The operation of TiO2, dye, and iodide/triodide (I/I3) was the same as in an ordinary solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell [10,11]. There were no major differences in the photovoltaic effect in cases of both “once polymerization” and “twice polymerization”.
Finally, we compare photovoltaic characteristics between commercial solar cell and the MCF rubber solar cell. Ordinary solar cells are generally categorized three types: silicon, compound, and organic. The commercial silicon solar cell has mA-ordered photocurrent, however, organic thin film solar cell, which involves well-known perovskite-type solar cell [10] and dye-sensitized solar cell [11,12], such as Gratzel-type solar cell [13], has scores of μA ordered photocurrent. Dry-type MCF rubber solar cell has μA-ordered photocurrent, in contrast, wet-type MCF rubber solar cell that was shown in the consecutive second report had scores of μA ordered photocurrent, which was the same ordered photocurrent of the ordinary organic thin film solar cell. Regarding photovoltage, the three types of the categorized solar cells, as well as dry and wet types of MCF rubber solar cells, have hundreds of voltage. On the other hand, the response time to illumination of ordinary commercial silicon solar cell is faster than the one of ordinary organic thin film solar cell. The response time of dry and wet types MCF rubber solar cell is the same as the one of ordinary organic thin film solar cell, which is dealt with in the consecutive second report [25].

4.2. With Compressing

Finally, we investigate the effect of compression on the photovoltage and photocurrent density due to irradiation by visible light in order to study the photovoltaics involving the piezoelectric effect. Figure 6 shows the photocurrent density and photovoltage extracted from the measured electric current density and voltage in the case of the MCF rubber solar cell of type (C), made by “twice polymerization” under compression. The negatively changing photocurrent density and voltage was due to the change in the initial state, which is caused by the following physical mechanism. Because of the mixture of p- and n-type semiconductors and others, we can understand the position of A and D+ by the dispersion of particles and molecules as shown in (b-1) of Figure 1. The total change in the position of A and D+ occurs in reverse along the electric field lines due to the pressure. From the electron transfer theory in the field of macromolecular complexes, in the case of OSETR with weak interaction among particles of Fe3O4 and Ni and molecules of polyisoprene, the resonance tunneling theory [26] or superexchange model [27] has been proposed as a well-known theoretical model. The latter is relevant to electron transfer between energy band gap of lowest unoccupied molecular orbitals (LUMO) and highest occupied molecular orbitals (HOMO) and ordinarily utilized to explain photoexcitation in solar cells. However, the tunneling theory is essential to explain the same, numerically. The material gap between p- and n-type semiconductors or A and D+ is an insulator with non-adiabatic process—it is through which an electron can jump to shift between different potential energy regions. The transfer of electric current in an MCF rubber made of silicon oil rubber solidified by drying without electrolytic polymerization has been investigated numerically by using the tunneling theory [28,29]. The same theoretical formula can be applied to the present MCF rubber solar cell. As shown in Figure A1 in Appendix A, transfer of electric current is easier under compression because of the decreasing size of the gap. It explains the electric conductivity in a composite conductor composited in an insulator, or the piezo effect in the state before contact of each conductor by compression. The same shall apply for the piezo effect on the photoelectricity, as shown in Figure 6.
The relation between the pressure and the compressive strain is also shown in the figure. There were two linear compressive regions with compressive elasticity, designated by I and II, and the latter had a slight nonlinearity because of the application of large compression, although, in general, there did not usually exist a plastic region in compression. The rigidity in “mag.” was larger than that in “non-mag.” because of the existence of Fe3O4 and Ni particles as fillers. The photovoltaic effect was increased by compression from viewing the changes in the absolute values. The changes of the photovoltaic effect become larger with increasing gradient of the compressive strain to pressure and compressive Young’s modulus. The magnitude of the pressure used in the present experiment is important because the maximum pressure corresponds to the used force with 500 g weight, and it is a small pressure range. Regarding the effect of larger pressure on photovoltaic effect, it is dealt with in a consecutive report.
In the case of no magnetic field applied under the electrolytic polymerization, no bulk hetero-junction structure was formed. Therefore, it was confirmed that the photovoltaic effect was increased due to the existence of the bulk hetero-junction structure.

5. Conclusions

The feasibility of designing a dry-type soft rubber solar cell by compounding MCF and NR-latex under electrolytic polymerization was investigated experimentally using a chemical-physical model with and without an electrolyte and a dye sensitizer. Photoexcitation was caused by the ionized polyisoprene in the role of an acceptor-like p-type semiconductor, and the hydrogen ion in the role of a donor-like n-type semiconductor, to create electrolytic polymerization in MCF rubber. It was just the mixing of the p- and n-type semiconductors, dye, and others, in an MCF rubber solar cell that caused the photovoltaics to manifest. By the application of a magnetic field under electrolytic polymerization, many magnetic clusters formed a bulk hetero-junction structure, enhancing the photovoltaics, whether the solar cell was compressed or not. In addition, the MCF rubber solar cell displayed piezoelectricity because of the built-in voltage and electric current from the ionized acceptors and donors. The photovoltaic effect was increased by compression. However, the result occurred within a small pressure range.
The electric current density obtained in the present experiment was relatively small. The causes were several experimental conditions—the kind of sensitized dye; the difference from the wet-type MCF rubber solar cell; the work function of the electrode material. These are dealt with in another consecutive report.
It is effective to utilize MCF rubber for enabling compression of a solar cell, as it is able to deploy the features of both piezoelectricity and photovoltaics in it. Therefore, it is shown that the H-Skin displays the hybrid functions of piezo and photovoltaic effects.

Author Contributions

For this research article, K.S. conceived, designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Funding

This research was funded in part by [JSPS KAKENHI] Grant Number [JP 18K04040].

Conflicts of Interest

The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study. The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Consider the behavior of electrons transmitted over the potential barrier of rubber as a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation in the x-direction, which is the direction of compression of the MCF rubber. The process of the transmitting electric current, through a pair of metal regions of γ with a range of 2aL and of γ1 with a range of 2aR, and one rubber region k with a range of b can be considered as a tunnel barrier problem on double barriers, and the diagram of potential energy V is shown in Figure A1a [25,29]. MCF rubber is organized as n pairs of two metal and one rubber regions. The wave function, Ψ, is presented by Equation (A1), where ħ is the h/2π, h the Planck’s constant, m the mass of electron, Vo the potential energy at regions γ, γ1 or k, and ε the energy of the electron.
2 2 m 2 Ψ x 2 + V o ( x ) Ψ ( x ) = ε Ψ ( x )
From Equation (A1), Ψ is resolved as Equations (A2) and (A3), respectively, for the regions k and γ where A, B, C, and D are arbitrary constants that can be defined from the continuity of differential coefficients on the boundary between k and γ (γ1) regions as a well-known ordinary quantum problem, as follows:
Ψ ( x ) = A e i k x + B e i k x ;
Ψ ( x ) = C e γ x + D e γ x ,
where
k = 2 m 2 ε , γ = 2 m 2 ( V o ε ) .
On the one pair of double barriers shown in Figure A1a, the arbitrary constants A and B exist in relation to constants E’ and F’ as shown in Equation (A5).
[ A B ] = M L M W M R [ E F ] , M T = M L M W M R
where
M L = [ m L 11 e i θ L 11 m L 12 e i θ L 12 m L 12 e i θ L 12 m L 11 e i θ L 11 ] , M W = [ e i k 1 b 0 0 e i k 1 b ] , M R = [ m R 11 e i θ R 11 m R 21 e i θ R 21 m R 21 e i θ L 21 m R 11 e i θ L 11 ]
m L 11 = 1 4 ( 1 + k 1 k ) 2 cosh 2 ( 2 γ a L ) + 1 4 ( k k 1 γ 2 k γ ) 2 sinh 2 ( 2 γ a L ) , m L 12 = 1 4 ( k k 1 + γ 2 k γ ) 2 sinh 2 ( 2 γ a L ) + 1 4 ( k 1 k 1 ) 2 cosh 2 ( 2 γ a L ) , m R 11 = 1 4 ( 1 + k 2 k 1 ) 2 cosh 2 ( 2 γ 1 a R ) + 1 4 ( k 1 k 2 γ 1 2 k 1 γ 1 ) 2 sinh 2 ( 2 γ 1 a R ) , m R 21 = 1 4 ( k 1 k 2 + γ 1 2 k 1 γ 1 ) 2 sinh 2 ( 2 γ 1 a R ) + 1 4 ( k 2 k 1 1 ) 2 cosh 2 ( 2 γ 1 a R ) , θ L 11 = tan 1 [ k k 1 γ 2 ( k + k 1 ) γ tanh ( 2 γ a L ) ] + ( k + k 1 ) a L θ L 12 = tan 1 [ k k 1 + γ 2 ( k k 1 ) γ tanh ( 2 γ a L ) ] + π + ( k k 1 ) a L θ R 11 = tan 1 [ k 1 k 2 γ 1 2 ( k 1 + k 2 ) γ 1 tanh ( 2 γ 1 a R ) ] ( k 1 + k 2 ) a R θ R 21 = tan 1 [ k 1 k 2 + γ 1 2 ( k 2 k 1 ) γ 1 tanh ( 2 γ 1 a R ) ] + π + ( k 1 k 2 ) a R
The transmitted probability can be given by Equation (A8).
T = | M T 11 | 2
One pair of double barriers is expanded to n pairs of double barriers as multi-barriers. Therefore, the matrix as shown by Equation (A5) is substituted into the matrix of the neighboring pair of double barriers, and this procedure is repeated to obtain the matrix of n pairs of double barriers, where Equation (A9) can be given because the material of each region of k and γ is the same as that of the other regions. Here, 2a is the thickness of metal particles, and b is the thickness of rubber between the metal particles. When eEo is the applied voltage, the voltage eE at the regions of γ and k is given as Equation (A9). Therefore, Equation (A5) is calculated by substituting Vo-ε-eEo for Vo of γ in Equation (A4).
k = k 1 = k 2 = , γ = γ 1 = γ 2 = , a L = a R = a e E = e E o { ( 2 n 1 ) a + 2 ( n 1 ) b } / L       at   region   of   γ   before   k e E = e E o { 2 n a + 2 ( n 1 ) b } / L       at   region   of   γ   after   k
As the thickness of the MCF rubber is divided into n pairs, the thickness of the MCF rubber L′ can be given by Equation (A10):
L′ = nΔL= 2n(a + b) [m].
T is calculated as shown in Figure A1b, where Lo′ is the initial thickness of the MCF rubber, and L′ is the thickness of the MCF rubber on the application of the compression force. As the MCF rubber is compressed, T becomes larger nonlinearly.
Figure A1. Theoretical results of the change in the translated ratio of electric current in relation to the compression ratio of the MCF rubber [25,29]: (a) Model of multi potential barrier of the rubber; (b) transmitted probability by compressing.
Figure A1. Theoretical results of the change in the translated ratio of electric current in relation to the compression ratio of the MCF rubber [25,29]: (a) Model of multi potential barrier of the rubber; (b) transmitted probability by compressing.
Sensors 18 01841 g0a1

References

  1. Won, S.C.; Sung, H.A.; Harim, J.; Yong, G.S.; Jong, H.K. Rubbery copolymer electrolytes containing polymerized ionic liquid for dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2012, 16, 3037–3043. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dong, J.K.; Sang, J.K.; Dong, K.R.; Jong, H.K. Synthesis of low-cost, rubbery amphiphilic comb-like copolymers and their use in the templated synthesis of mesoporous TiO2 films for solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 7345–7353. [Google Scholar]
  3. Suleman, M.; Kumar, Y.; Hashmi, S.A. Solid-state electric double layer capacitors fabricated with plastic crystal based flexible gel polymer electrolytes: Effective role of electrolyte anions. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 163, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buffa, M.; Carturan, S.; Debije, M.G.; Quaranta, A.; Maggioni, G. Dye-doped polysiloxane rubbers for luminescent solar concentrator systems. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2012, 103, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cleave, J.V.; Thakur, M. Photovoltaic cells involving the nonconjugated conductive polymer iodine-doped styrene-butadiene-rubber (SBR). J. Macromol. Sci. Part A Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 52, 798–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hammock, M.L.; Chortos, A.; Tee, B.C.K.; Tok, J.B.H.; Bao, Z. 25th anniversary article: The evolution of electronic skin (E-Skin): A brief history, design considerations, and recent progress. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5997–6038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Shimada, K.; Saga, N. Mechanical enhancement of sensitivity in natural rubber using electrolytic polymerization aided by a magnetic field and MCF for application in haptic sensors. Sensors 2016, 16, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shimada, K.; Shuchi, S.; Kanno, H.; Wu, Y.; Kamiyama, S. Magnetic cluster and its applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2005, 289, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shimada, K.; Saga, N. Development of a hybrid piezo natural rubber piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity sensor with magnetic clusters made by electric and magnetic field assistance and filling with magnetic compound fluid. Sensors 2017, 17, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kojima, A.; Teshima, K.; Shirai, Y.; Miyasaka, T. Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050–6051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tsubomura, H.; Matsumura, M.; Nomura, Y.; Amamiya, T. Dye sensitized zinc oxide: Aqueous electrolyte platinum photocell. Nature 1976, 261, 402–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Su’ait, M.S.; Rahman, M.Y.A.; Ahmad, A. Review on polymer electrolyte in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Sol. Energy 2015, 115, 452–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. O’regan, B.; Gratzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shimada, K. Enhancement of MCF rubber utilizing electric and magnetic fields, and clarification of electrolytic polymerization. Sensors 2017, 17, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shimada, K.; Miyazaki, T.; Shibayama, A.; Fujita, T. Extraction of magnetic clusters self-assembled by a magnetic field. Smart Mater. Struct. 2003, 12, 297–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Whitten, D.G. Photoinduced electron-transfer reactions of metal complexes in solution. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fendler, J.H. Atomic and molecular clusters in membrane mimetic chemistry. Chem. Rev. 1987, 87, 877–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iwasawa, Y. Tailored Metal Catalysts; D. Reidel Publishing Company: Dordrecht, The Neverlands, 1986; pp. 167–172. ISBN 90-277-1866-0. [Google Scholar]
  20. Duonghong, D.; Ramsden, J.; Gratzel, M. Dynamics of interfacial electron-transfer processes in colloidal semiconductor systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2977–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miller, J.R.; Beitz, J.V.; Huddleston, R.K. Effect of free energy on rates of electron transfer between molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5057–5067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vining, W.J.; Surridge, N.A.; Meyer, T.J. pH-indyced, long-range electron transfer across a thin polymeric film. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 2281–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nyberg, T.; Zhang, F.; Inganas, O. Macromolecular nanoelectronics. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2002, 2, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fan, F.R.F.; Bard, A.J. Spectral sensitization of the heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation of hydroquinone in aqueous solutions at phthalocyanine-coated TiO2 powders. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6139–6140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shimada, K. Elastic MCF rubber with photovoltaics and sensing on hybrid skin (H-Skin) for artificial skin by utilizing natural rubber: 2nd report on effect of tension and compression on properties of hybrid photo- and piezo-electricity in wet-type solar cell rubber. Sensors 2018. submitted. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sollner, T.C.L.G.; Goodhue, W.D.; Tannenwald, P.E.; Parker, C.D.; Peck, D.D. Resonant tuuneling through quantum wells at frequencies up to 2.5 THz. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1983, 43, 588–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Miller, J.R.; Beitz, J.V. Long range transfer of positive charge between dopant molecules in a rigid glassy matrix. J. Chem. Phys. 1981, 74, 6746–6756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shimada, K. Theoretical investigation by quantum mechanics on the tunnel diode effect of electric conductive characteristics and haptic sensing in MCF rubber. J. Sens. 2010, 2010, 731854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shimada, K. Quantum mechanical investigation of the electric and thermal characteristics of magnetic compound fluid as a semiconductor on metal combined with rubber. ISRN Nanotechnol. 2011, 2011, 259543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Model of electrolytically polymerized MCF solar cell rubber vulcanized in a magnetic field: (a) response at the area facing anode side with transit from (a-1) to (a-2) which is generated by irradiation; (b) response at the area between anode and cathode sides which is shifted from (b-1) to (b-3) as built-in voltage and current; (c) response at the area facing cathode side with transit (c-1) which is generated by irradiation.
Figure 1. Model of electrolytically polymerized MCF solar cell rubber vulcanized in a magnetic field: (a) response at the area facing anode side with transit from (a-1) to (a-2) which is generated by irradiation; (b) response at the area between anode and cathode sides which is shifted from (b-1) to (b-3) as built-in voltage and current; (c) response at the area facing cathode side with transit (c-1) which is generated by irradiation.
Sensors 18 01841 g001
Figure 2. Schematics of the MCF rubber production procedure to create solar cell.
Figure 2. Schematics of the MCF rubber production procedure to create solar cell.
Sensors 18 01841 g002
Figure 3. Change in voltage and electric current density by turning ultraviolet light on and off: (a) voltage; (b) electric current density. “elec.”, electrolytic polymerization; “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-“, without one. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell made of types (A) and (B), without MK2 and KI + I2.
Figure 3. Change in voltage and electric current density by turning ultraviolet light on and off: (a) voltage; (b) electric current density. “elec.”, electrolytic polymerization; “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-“, without one. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell made of types (A) and (B), without MK2 and KI + I2.
Sensors 18 01841 g003
Figure 4. Current-potential curves of the MCF rubber solar cell of types (A) and (B) (these types denote in Section 2) without MK2 and KI + I2 by turning ultraviolet light on, for each of the components of Figure 3: (a) for cases of NR-latex, NR-latex with oleic acid, NR-latex with MF; (b) for cases of NR-latex with Ni and MF, NR-latex with Ni, MF and TiO2. “elec.”, electrolytic polymerization; “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-”, without one. Each color indicates a component of types of (A) and (B) of the MCF rubber solar cell without MK2 and KI + I2.
Figure 4. Current-potential curves of the MCF rubber solar cell of types (A) and (B) (these types denote in Section 2) without MK2 and KI + I2 by turning ultraviolet light on, for each of the components of Figure 3: (a) for cases of NR-latex, NR-latex with oleic acid, NR-latex with MF; (b) for cases of NR-latex with Ni and MF, NR-latex with Ni, MF and TiO2. “elec.”, electrolytic polymerization; “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-”, without one. Each color indicates a component of types of (A) and (B) of the MCF rubber solar cell without MK2 and KI + I2.
Sensors 18 01841 g004
Figure 5. Change in voltage and electric current density: (a) by turning visible light on and off; (b) by turning ultraviolet light on and off. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell of type (C).
Figure 5. Change in voltage and electric current density: (a) by turning visible light on and off; (b) by turning ultraviolet light on and off. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell of type (C).
Sensors 18 01841 g005
Figure 6. Change in photovoltage and photocurrent by pressure: “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-”, without one. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell of type (C).
Figure 6. Change in photovoltage and photocurrent by pressure: “mag.”, with magnetic field at electrolytic polymerization; “no-”, without one. Each color indicates a component of the MCF rubber solar cell of type (C).
Sensors 18 01841 g006
Table 1. Photoelectricity by visible and ultraviolet lights for each components of Figure 3. The MCF rubber solar cell was made of types (A) and (B), without MK2 and KI + I2. Each specimen denotes circle (○) and slash (/): the former indicated the use of the corresponding component, while the latter indicated no use.
Table 1. Photoelectricity by visible and ultraviolet lights for each components of Figure 3. The MCF rubber solar cell was made of types (A) and (B), without MK2 and KI + I2. Each specimen denotes circle (○) and slash (/): the former indicated the use of the corresponding component, while the latter indicated no use.
NiMFOleic AcidTiO2 (2 g)NR-LatexElec.Mag.Visible LightUltraviolet Light
Voltage [mV]Current Density [μA/cm2]Voltage [mV]Current Density [μA/cm2]
6.310.00013.00.000
1090.1001200.017
1030.1381570.759
1270.0801790.320
1090.3172001.18
1360.5942682.25
78.10.1251660.438
98.80.1731980.317
1050.6912153.30
78.70.1331400.333
1220.1622360.541
1500.7992765.10

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shimada, K. Elastic MCF Rubber with Photovoltaics and Sensing for Use as Artificial or Hybrid Skin (H-Skin): 1st Report on Dry-Type Solar Cell Rubber with Piezoelectricity for Compressive Sensing. Sensors 2018, 18, 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061841

AMA Style

Shimada K. Elastic MCF Rubber with Photovoltaics and Sensing for Use as Artificial or Hybrid Skin (H-Skin): 1st Report on Dry-Type Solar Cell Rubber with Piezoelectricity for Compressive Sensing. Sensors. 2018; 18(6):1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shimada, Kunio. 2018. "Elastic MCF Rubber with Photovoltaics and Sensing for Use as Artificial or Hybrid Skin (H-Skin): 1st Report on Dry-Type Solar Cell Rubber with Piezoelectricity for Compressive Sensing" Sensors 18, no. 6: 1841. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop