Next Article in Journal
Speed Bump Detection Using Accelerometric Features: A Genetic Algorithm Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Surface Plasmon Resonance and Bending Loss-Based U-Shaped Plastic Optical Fiber Biosensors
Previous Article in Journal
Specim IQ: Evaluation of a New, Miniaturized Handheld Hyperspectral Camera and Its Application for Plant Phenotyping and Disease Detection
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Lab-on-a-Chip-Based Non-Invasive Optical Sensor for Measuring Glucose in Saliva
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of Flow Cytometric Fluorescence Lifetime with Time-Delay Estimation of Pulse Signals

1
Beijing Key Laboratory for Optoelectronics Measurement Technology, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China
2
Key Lab of Microelectronic Devices & Integrated Technology, Institute of Microelectronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Sensors 2018, 18(2), 442; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020442
Submission received: 24 December 2017 / Revised: 29 January 2018 / Accepted: 30 January 2018 / Published: 3 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical Biochemical Sensor Systems and Applications)

Abstract

:
The measurement of fluorescence lifetimes emerged in flow cytometry because it is not impacted by the non-linearity, which occurs in fluorescence intensity measurements. However, this significantly increases the cost and complexity of a traditional flow cytometer. This work reports a simple method of fluorescence lifetime measurement of a flow cytometer based on the cytometric fluorescence pulse time-delay estimation and hardware time-delay calibration. The modified chirp Z-transform (MCZT) algorithm, combined with the algorithm of fine interpolation of correlation peak (FICP), is applied to improve the temporal resolution of the cross-correlation function of the scattering and fluorescence signals, which in turn improves the time-delay estimation accuracy. The estimation accuracy is verified by Gauss fitting. Cells that were labeled simultaneously with three-color reagents are measured; the statistical results of 5000 cells are compared with reference values and are verified with the pulse width variation. The results show the potential of fluorescence lifetime measurements in the traditional flow cytometer.

1. Introduction

Flow cytometry (FCM) is an important clinical diagnostics technology used in immunology, hematology, oncology and basic biomedical research. Single cells or other microspheres in suspension move linearly through a flow chamber at a high speed and are illuminated by a shaped laser beam. By measuring the scatter light signal and the fluorescence signal, the sample microspheres can be quantitatively detected at a high speed, one by one. The measurement of fluorescence lifetimes is emerging in FCM, because it is not impacted by the non-linearity that occurs in intensity measurements. It adds in a variety of single-cell, multi-parametric measurements [1,2,3,4]. Moreover, fluorescence lifetime measurements by flow cytometer yield additional information about fluorophore–cell interactions at the molecular level. Fluorescence lifetime does not depend on initial perturbation conditions, such as light exposure duration, excitation wavelength, measurement method, single or multiphoton excitation and is not affected by photo bleaching. It could be considered as a state function. Moreover, fluorescence lifetime is independent of the fluorescence intensity and fluorophore concentration. It is rendered as a separate yet complementary method to traditional fluorescence intensity measurements [5,6,7,8].
The two main approaches of fluorescence lifetime detection that have been applied in flow cytometry are “frequency-domain” and “time-domain” methods. With frequency-domain method, the excitation laser is sinusoidally modulated at high frequencies, the fluorescence is emitted and oscillate at the same frequency as the excitation light. The modulated fluorescence light is amplitude-attenuated and phase-shifted with respect to the incident light [7,8]. In time-domain systems, the excitation source is typically pulsed at a femtosecond rate. The fluorescence lifetime is resolved by observing the fluorescence decay over time with a gated photo-detector and then fitted in an appropriate exponential-decay (single exponential or multi-exponential) model. The cost and complexity of a traditional flow cytometer increases significantly with both time- and frequency-domain approaches. Several high-frequency hardware components must be added to the electrical and signal processing systems to perform phase-sensitive flow cytometer. Some steps such as high-frequency mixing and filtering are introduced if the high-frequency signals are out of the range of data acquisition system employed [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
This paper reports a simple fluorescence lifetime measurement method based on cytometric time-delay estimation of pulse signals and calibration of hardware time-delay. A high-resolution analysis method of the cross-correlation frequency spectrum based on MCZT algorithm is applied and then the FICP algorithm is integrated to improve the temporal resolution. Gauss fitting algorithm is introduced for the verification of time-delay estimation. The calculated lifetimes of three fluorescence pulse signals are compared with reference values provided by the vendors and with pulse width variations. This method avoids modulating the excitation source at high frequency and effectively presents a method for lifetime detection that could be implemented in most standard flow cytometers more practically.

2. Theory

2.1. Flow Cytometric Fluorescence Lifetime

Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of laser excited fluorescence of a fluorescently labeled microsphere (green sphere) with three types of fluorochrome (fluorochrome 1: yellow ball, fluorochrome 2: red ball, fluorochrome 3: brown ball). The microsphere is irradiated by the laser photon (blue star) and the outer electron (black ball) transited from the ground state ① to the excited-signal state ② and then relaxed to a single state ③ with some energy lost in the form of heat. Upon returning to ground state, a fluorescent photon (fluorescent photon 1: yellow star, fluorescent photon 2: red star, fluorescent photon 3: brown star) is emitted. Each of the processes occurs with a certain probability, characterized by decay rate constants (k). The fluorescence lifetime is defined as the average length of time for the set of molecules to decay from one ② to ①, which is inversely proportional to the rate of decay (τ = 1/k) [18,19,20,21]. The corresponding fluorescence lifetimes of the three types of fluorochrome in Figure 1 are marked as τ1, τ2 and τ3 (τ1 < τ2 < τ3).
As illustrated in Figure 1, fluorescence lifetime is determined by the electron energy level structure of the fluorochrome molecules in the specific surrounding microenvironment. However, since fluorescence lifetimes of different fluorochromes generally range from 0.1 ns to 20 ns, it is impossible to measure them directly with the standard flow cytometer. Considering that the scatter pulses are emitted as soon as the laser photons arrive at the microsphere, the time-delay between the scatter and fluorescence light pulse signals can be used to represent the lifetime.

2.2. Forward-Scattered and Fluorescent Light Pulses

Qualitatively, the forward-scattered light pulse (Lfs(t)) and fluorescent light pulses Lfl(t) (Lfl1(t), Lfl2(t) and Lfl3(t)) are generated when a microsphere flows through the laser excitation volume as shown in Figure 2. Conventionally, the laser beam is focused into elliptical excitation volume with the length of the minor axis slightly longer than the diameter of tested microspheres or cells. The microsphere moves along the flow direction through the excitation area (blue ellipsoid in Figure 2). A Gaussian-like trace reflects the resulting signal, where the forward-scattered emission begins to increase at time Ι (the microsphere flows across the upper limb L0 into the excitation volume), peaks at time Π and decreases as the microsphere moves from time Π to time Ш (the microsphere flows across the lower limb L1).
Assume that the minor axis length of excitation volume is L, the radius of the microsphere is R and the microsphere flows at a constant speed v. Spatially, the laser intensity distribution along the flow direction could be assumed as e ( l L / 2 ) 2 / 2 σ 2 , where σ is an invariant related to L. Therefore, the transit time is (L + 2R)/v. The microsphere could be divided into M subintervals of equal width along the flow direction. Each subinterval could be considered as a cylinder, with the height defined as dx = 2R/M. Therefore, at time t = 0 the distance between the ith subinterval and L0 is x = i2R/M and the lateral area of the ith subinterval is 2 π R 2 ( R x ) 2 d x . At time t = t0, the ith subinterval arrives at the location where the laser intensity of the excitation volume is e ( v t 0 x L / 2 ) 2 / 2 σ 2 . Finally, the time-dependent forward-scattered light intensity is given as:
L f s ( t ) = 0 2 R 2 π R 2 ( R x ) 2 e ( v t x L / 2 ) 2 2 σ 2 d x
where t ranges from 0 to (L + 2R)/v.
The peak value and peak location of the cytometric pulses would be influenced by fluorescence lifetime τ. Some other influencing factors, such as the number of fluorochromes labelled on the cell and the quantum efficiency, are neglected here to analyze the individual influence of fluorescence lifetime. Assuming single exponential decay kinetics, the fluorescence light signal (Lfl(t)) can be expressed as a convolution of the forward-scattered light and the single exponential decay, such that [22,23,24]:
L f l ( t ) = L f s ( t ) * e t τ
where symbol * means convolution operation.
Considering the frequency spectrum (Lfl(ω)) of Lfl(t) as follows:
L f l ( ω ) = L f s ( ω ) E ( ω ) = A E e j φ f s e j φ E = A E e j φ f s e j ( arctan ω τ ) A E e j φ f s e j ω τ
where Lfs(ω), E(ω) is the frequency spectrum of Lfs(t) and e t τ , respectively; A and φfs are the amplitude and phase of Lfs(ω); E and φE are the amplitude and phase of E(ω). The phase shift between Lfs(ω) and Lfl(ω) is e j ω τ , therefore, the time-delay between Lfs(t) and Lfl(t) is the fluorescence lifetime τ. Namely, the time-delay between peak locations of pulse signals is τ. As shown in Figure 2, the time-delays between the forward-scattered and the fluorescence pulse signals shown are τ1, τ2 and τ3. Due to the process of convolution, τ will cause the asymmetry of fluorescence pulse signals. However, compared with the pulse width, τ is small enough to neglect the asymmetry. The fluorescence pulses could be expressed as Gaussian shapes. Some results of Gauss fitting of fluorescence pulses could be found in Section 4.2.
In order to illustrate the influence of fluorescence lifetime, a Gaussian signal is taken as fs(t) for the simulation analysis. Considering that, the cytometric pulse width is about the microsecond level generally (depends on the sample flow rate, cell size and the minor axis length of excitation volume), the width of fs(t) is set at 5 μs. Three fluorescence pulse signals with different lifetimes (τ1 = 1 ns, τ2 = 2 ns, τ3 = 3 ns) calculated using Equation (2) are shown in Figure 3.
As illustrated in Figure 3a, longer lifetimes will introduce higher peak values. Considering that, there is a sensitivity limit in the detectors (traditionally, PMT: photomultiplier tube), which are used to detect the fluorescence light. There will be a threshold for the detection. In other words, when the intensity is below the threshold, fluorescence light would not be detected. For this reason, the width of the fluorescence pulse signal is decreased, as shown in Figure 3b. The peak values of fluorescence pulse signals with different lifetimes are normalized to illustrate the change of pulse width. Taking a certain width of forward-scattered signal and a certain threshold value, the relationship between lifetime and width variation can be acquired. The width variation could be used for the verification of lifetime measurement accuracy. Moreover, as mentioned above, time-delays between the forward-scattered and the fluorescence pulse signals equal to corresponding fluorescence lifetimes. However, it is impossible to visually distinguish the 3 ns time-delay with the span of 5 μs in Figure 3. The different intensity profiles for different lifetimes are more likely to overlap in time axis.

2.3. Time-Delay Estimation

In the process of cytometric measurement, the light pulse signals Lfs(t) and Lfl(t) are converted to electrical signals by photovoltaic detectors and then processed by electronic systems. The final output signals corresponding to Lfs(t) and Lfl(t), defined as fs and fl, are the eventually handled using time-delay estimation. Therefore, the time-delay acquired includes fluorescence lifetime and the time-delay introduced by hardware. In order to distinguish the lifetime, calibration process should be applied to eliminate the time-delay introduced by photovoltaic conversion and electric systems. The calibration process could be found in Section 3.2. With the purpose of distinguish the lifetime (nanosecond) from the acquired time-delay (microsecond), there are two key points should be confirmed: (1) The time-domain resolution of the method described in manuscript (nanosecond could be recognized); (2) The calibration process is effective and accurate (The time-delay introduced by photovoltaic conversion and electric systems could be eliminated accurately).
To estimate the time-delay between fs and fl, the cross-correlation function is applied to restrain the influence of noise. The MCZT [25] method is executed to acquire the spectral information with high resolution. The FICP [26] algorithm is then used to improve the resolution of the time-domain cross-correlative function. The time-delay estimation processing using the comprehensive method presented in this work is illustrated in Figure 4.
Assuming that the forward-scattered pulse signal fs(n) and the fluorescence pulse signal flm(n) are data sequences containing N points, the corresponding zoomed frequency spectrum is described by the following transform:
{ F S ( k ) = M C Z T ( f s ( n ) ) = n = 0 N 1 f s ( n ) exp ( j 2 π N 1 k n ) F L m ( k ) = M C Z T ( f l m ( n ) ) = n = 0 N 1 f l m ( n ) exp ( j 2 π N 1 k n )
where m = 1, 2, 3 and k = 0, 1 … N − 1.
The sampling frequency is raised to N2/N1 times that of the initial sampling frequency of analog-to-digital converter (ADC), when the cycle of frequency spectrum is extended from N1 to N2 by inserting zero. The resolution of the time-domain cross-correlation function is increased to N2/N1 times with the same number of calculations. The complete cross-correlation frequency spectrum is constructed as follows:
R m ( k ) = { R 1 ( k ) = F S ( k ) F L m * ( k ) , 0 R 1 * ( N 2 k ) k = 0 , 1 , , N 1 k = N , , N 2 N k = N 2 N + 1 , , N 2 1
where FLm * (k) is the conjugation of FLm(k), R1* (N2 − k) is the conjugation of R1 (N2 − k).
The time-delay between fs and fl falls into a certain limited range. The first part rm1(n) and the last part rm2(n) of the cross-correlation function in the time domain are calculated by Equations (6) and (7) respectively, as follows:
r m 1 ( n ) = [ k = 0 N 1 R 1 ( k ) exp ( j 2 π N 2 k n ) + exp ( j 2 π N 2 N n ) k = 0 N 1 R 1 * ( N k ) exp ( j 2 π N 2 k n ) ] / N 2
r m 2 ( n ) = exp ( j 2 π N 2 N n ) k = 0 N 1 [ R 1 ( k ) exp ( j 2 π N 2 k n ) ] / N 2 + exp [ j 2 π N 2 ( N 2 n N ) ] k = 0 N 1 [ R 1 * ( N k ) exp ( j 2 π N 2 k n ) ] exp ( j 2 π N 2 k n ) / N 2
Eventually, the integrated cross-correlation function in the time domain rm(n) is constructed with rm1(n) and rm2(n) as:
r m ( n ) = { r m 1 ( n ) , n = 0 , 1 , , N 1 r m 2 ( 2 N + n ) n = N , , 1

3. Materials and Method

3.1. Time-Delay Estimation with Microspheres

The sample used in this study included Cyto-Trol Control Cells Kit (Beckman Coulter Inc. Ref. 6604248) and fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies CD3-FITC (Beckman Coulter Inc. Ref. A07746), CD8-PE (Beckman Coulter Inc. Ref. A07757) and CD4-PC5 (Beckman Coulter Inc. Ref. A07752). They are lyophilized preparation of human lymphocytes that exhibit surface antigens detectable with monoclonal antibodies. These cells are directly conjugated with monoclonal antibodies. All fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies are excited at 488 nm. The PMTs used for the detection of fluorescence light are H11903-20mod (Hamamatsu) with a frequency bandwidth from DC to 1 MHz and a luminous sensitivity of 500 μA/lm. The photodiode used for the detection of forward-scattered light is Si Pin photodiode S9195 (Hamamatsu) with a terminal capacitance of 80 pF and a photo sensitivity of 0.28 A/W (λ = 405 nm). The ADCs used are AD9690 (500 MSPS: Mega samples per second, 14 bit, ANALOG DEVICE) and AD9446-100 (100 MSPS, 14 bit, ANALOG DEVICE). The function generator used for time-delay calibration is a dual channel arbitrary/function generator AFG3022C (Tektronix) with a sample rate of 250 MSPS and a bandwidth of 25 MHz.
The lymphocytes were stained with three-color reagents simultaneously and used to acquire the cytometric pulses (fs, fl1, fl2 and fl3). The flow cytometry measurements were executed using a Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter Corp., Brea, CA, USA).

3.2. Time-Delay Calibration of Photovoltaic Conversion and Electric Systems

As mentioned above, the time-delay acquired includes fluorescence lifetime and the time-delay introduced by hardware (includes photovoltaic conversion and electric system). It is necessary to account for the inherent time-delay introduced by the hardware variables, such as the differences in the photoelectric detector, circuitry and cable, via calibration. Generally, the electrical hardware system used in flow cytometer is time invariant. Namely, the transfer function of electrical hardware system is time-independent, which means that the time-delay introduced by hardware could be acquired and eliminated accurately. The calibration process is performed as shown in Figure 5.
Two light-emitting diodes (LEDs) are pulsed by AFG3022C with Gaussian waveforms as light sources. S_fs and S_fl1 are Gaussian-shaped light pulses. S_fs is used to represent the forward-scattered light pulse and S_fl1 is used to represent the fluorescent-light pulse of a flow cytometer. S_fs and S_fl1 are the emissions of LED1 and LED2, which are separately pulsed by the two channels of AFG3022C. The corresponding electrical pulse signal is presented in terms of V_fs and V1_fl1 (V2_fl1) and then converted to digital signals using ADCs labeled ADC0 and ADC1, respectively. The ADC0 and ADC1 clock signals are provided by one crystal oscillator, to ensure that V_fs and V1_fl1 (V2_fl1) are converted simultaneously.
Two steps are taken for the calibration of light-pulse and hardware time-delay, respectively. Figure 5a shows the calibration of light-pulse time-delay, to ensure that S_fs and S_fl1 are synchronous. S_fs and S_fl1 are detected by the same photodiodes, processed with the same electric system 0 and then conserved by ADC0 and ADC1, respectively. The time-delay between V_fs and V1_fl1 is evaluated and the phase shift between the two channels of AFG3022C adjusted until the time-delay between V_fs and V1_fl1 is zero. So far, the time-delay error between the two channels of function generator and the response time differences of the two LEDs has been calibrated. S_fs and S_fl1 are synchronous. As illustrated in Figure 5b, S_fl1 is detected by a PMT and processed with electric system 1. The PMT and electric system 1 are the same as those used in actual cytometric measurement. The time-delay between V_fs and V2_fl1, which is the time-delay introduced by the photovoltaic conversion and electric systems can be acquired.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Time-Delay Estimation

The cells used for cytometric measurement are labeled with three-color reagents simultaneously; therefore, a series of pulse signals (fs, fl1, fl2 and fl3) from one single cell could be acquired. One series of pulse signals is taken as an example in Figure 6. The ADC used in measurement is AD9446-100, with a conversion rate of 100 MSPS. The time-delay between the fl1, fl2, fl3 and fs was estimated using the FICP algorithm. The series of signals were converted from analog to digital by ADCs with a higher conversion rate (AD9690) and the peak locations of these pulse signals were acquired using a Gauss fitting algorithm, for comparison with the results of the proposed method.
The sampling frequency of fs and flm in this work is 100 MHz, meaning that the time interval between adjacent points in the pulse signal is 10 ns. The time-domain cross-correlation function r(n) is calculated with FICP (N2/N1 = 50), as shown in Figure 7. Only the points around the peak are acquired and the time resolution is 0.2 ns (10 ns/(N2/N1)); the corresponding time-delay is Δt1 = 765.6 ns (3828 × 0.2 ns), Δt2 = 748.4 ns (3742 × 0.2 ns) and Δt3 = 772.6 ns (3863 × 0.2 ns). The resolution of the cross-correlation peak is improved by increasing the interpolation multiple of the frequency spectrum, namely, the computational accuracy of the time-delay estimation is higher with FICP, particularly for the pulse signals of low sampling frequency.

4.2. Curve Fitting

One series of pulse signals (fs, fl1, fl2 and fl3) was taken as an example for the FICP feasibility analysis. The curves obtained with Gauss fitting are shown in Figure 8, where the green curves are the observed signals and the black curves are the Gauss fitting results.
The Gauss fitting was modeled by K 1 e ( ( t K 2 ) / K 3 ) 2 and the results were evaluated with the root mean square error (RMSE) and the R-squared values. RMSE is an estimate of the standard deviation of the random component in a data set and was used to evaluate the deviation between the curve fitting result and the observed signal in this study. The RMSE is defined as
R M S E = 1 n i = 1 n ( X o b s , i X m o d e l , i ) 2
where Xobs is the observed value, Xfit is the curve fitting result and n is the length of the observed signal, which is equal to that of the fitting result.
R-squared is the square of the correlation between the observed and predicted values, defined as the ratio of the sum of the squares of the regression (SSR) and the total sum of squares (SST).
R s q u a r e d = S S R S S T
SSR and SST are defined as S S R = 1 n i = 1 n ( X f i t , i X ¯ o b s ) 2 and S S T = i = 1 n ( X o b s , i X ¯ o b s ) 2 , where X ¯ o b s is the mean value of the signal. The Gauss fitting results at conversion rates of 500 MSPS and 100 MSPS, together with the evaluation indexes are listed in Table 1. As indicated, the RMSE is less than 0.03 and the R-squared values are larger than 0.99. Therefore, the pulse signals were represented nearly perfectly by the Gauss fitting results.
Table 2 lists the peak locations and the time -delays Δt1, Δt2 and Δt3 of cytometric pulse signals calculated using Gauss fitting and the time-delays Δt1, Δt2 and Δt3, acquired with FICP. As illustrated, the time-delays of each fluorescence pulse signals obtained via Gauss fitting and FICP are very close. The FICP algorithm is feasible for time-delay estimation.
Then, 5000 series pulse signals of fluorescently labeled cells were detected and the time delays between fl1, fl2, fl3 and fs were calculated using Gauss fitting and the FICP method. Table 3 lists the statistical results of the time-delay estimation after calibration. The mean values, standard deviations (SDs, σ = 1 n 1 i = 1 n ( x i x ¯ ) 2 ) and relative standard deviations (RSDs, σ x ¯ × 100 % ) were taken as indexes to evaluate the statistical properties of the fluorescence pulse signals obtained from the same type of fluorochrome.
As can be seen, the mean values of each lifetime obtained via Gauss fitting and FICP are very close and the SDs and RSDs determined for the FICP method values are significantly smaller than those for the Gauss fitting results. The calculated lifetimes τ1, τ2 and τ3, are close to the reference values 7.5 ns, 5.0 ns and 10.2 ns, which are provided by the vendor. Therefore, the lifetime can be detected correctly using the proposed method.

4.3. Verification with Pulse Width Variation

As mentioned in Section 2.2, the width of fluorescence pulse signal will be influenced by fluorescence lifetime and the threshold in the detection. The width variation could be used for the verification of lifetime measurement accuracy.
Considering the process of detection, the observed fluorescence pulse signals could be expressed as
{ f s ( t ) ( N 1 P 1 e t τ 1 ) h c λ 1 G 1 a 1 = f l 1 ( t ) f s ( t ) ( N 2 P 2 e t τ 2 ) h c λ 2 G 2 a 2 = f l 2 ( t ) f s ( t ) ( N 3 P 3 e t τ 3 ) h c λ 3 G 3 a 3 = f l 3 ( t )
where N1, N2 and N3 are the number of fluorochromes labeled on a single cell; P1, P2 and P3 are the corresponding quantum efficiencies; λ1, λ2 and λ3 are the average wavelength of each fluorescence emission spectrum; c is the velocity of light; h is the Planck’s constant; G1, G2 and G3 are the gains of each circuit system (include the gains of photovoltaic conversion and electric system); a1, a2 and a3 are the luminous sensitivity of each detectors at λ1, λ2 and λ3. In the measurement, fl1(t), fl2(t) and fl3(t) are the observed results, λ1, λ2, λ3, a1, a2, a3, G1, G2 and G3 are known parameters. Equation (11) could be manipulated as
{ N 1 P 1 f s ( t ) ( e t τ 1 ) = f l 1 ( t ) / h c λ 1 G 1 a 1 N 2 P 2 f s ( t ) ( e t τ 2 ) = f l 2 ( t ) / h c λ 2 G 2 a 2 N 3 P 3 f s ( t ) ( e t τ 3 ) = f l 3 ( t ) / h c λ 3 G 3 a 3
In order to analyze the individual influence of lifetimes ( f s ( t ) ( e t τ ) ), N1P1, N2P2 and N3P3 are normalized to acquire the relative relationship between width variations of different lifetimes, as follows:
{ N 1 P 1 N 2 P 2 = f l 1 ( 0 ) G 2 a 2 λ 1 f l 2 ( 0 ) G 1 a 1 λ 2 N 1 P 1 N 3 P 3 = f l 1 ( 0 ) G 3 a 3 λ 1 f l 3 ( 0 ) G 1 a 1 λ 3
where fl1(0), fl2(0) and fl3(0) are the baseline values of fl1(t), fl2(t) and fl3(t), namely, the initial intensities at time 0.
The curves of Figure 6 are normalized and the results are shown in Figure 9. As illustrated, the baselines of normalized pulse signals are almost equal. The peak value of pulse signal is lower with shorter lifetime. Considering the influence of threshold, the pulse width of the signal with smaller lifetime is shorter and the pulse width variation compared to the width of fs is larger. In order to illustrate the width variation, the parameter K3 of Gauss fitting ( K 1 e ( ( t K 2 ) / K 3 ) 2 ) is used in this work. Analyzing the normalized pulse signals with Gauss fitting, the width variations of fl1, fl2 and fl3 represented by ΔK3 are 16.62, 19.60 and 9.47, respectively.
On other hand, the width variation of different lifetimes could be acquired using Equation (2). The pulse signal fs in Figure 6 is used as Lfs(t), the lifetime τ ranges from 0.1 ns to 20 ns, stepped by 0.1 ns. The relationship between lifetime and width variation could be acquired and the results of ΔK3 are shown in Figure 10 for the verification of lifetime measurement accuracy using the proposed method. As shown, the width variations acquired with the proposed method in this work are consistent with those from the theoretical calculations.

5. Conclusions

To summarize, this work reports a simple method of measurement of fluorescence lifetime based on cytometric pulse signals’ time-delay estimation. The lifetime is acquired by estimating the pulse signals’ time-delay and then calibrating the time-delay of hardware. A high-resolution time-delay estimation method combining MCZT with FICP, in order to characterize the fluorescence pulse signal of a standard flow cytometer without changing the hardware, is applied. The feasibility of the time-delay estimation is verified by Gauss fitting. Finally, the statistical results of the proposed method are compared with reference values provided by the vendor. Meanwhile, the measured lifetimes are verified with the calculated pulse width variation. The proposed method could be applied to any past or presently marketed instrument and it could involve measuring the fluorescence dynamics with multiple fluorophores. The fluorescence lifetime contains and can reveal, more information than the traditional data obtained by peak-area-width list mode. Future work will involve expanding to cell sorting systems and using this approach to alleviate intensity-related problems such as spectral overlap and auto-fluorescence noise.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61605010) and the Project of construction of innovative teams and teacher career development for universities and colleges under Beijing municipality (IDHT20130518).

Author Contributions

In this paper, W.Z. conceived the idea, organized the paper and analyzed the data; M.D. organized the paper, acquired the funding and supervised the work and participated in experiment and analysis in part; X.L. and L.Z. contributed to algorithm design and data handling. All authors revised the paper for intellectual content.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

FCMFlow cytometry
ADCAnalog-to-Digital Converter
MCZTModified Chirp Z-Transform
FICPFine Interpolation of Correlation Peak
PMTPhotomultiplier tube
LEDLight-emitting diodes
MSPSMega samples per second
RMSERoot Mean Square Error
SSRSum of Squares of the Regression
SSTTotal Sum of Squares
SDStandard Deviation
RSDRelative standard deviation
CVCoefficients of Variation

References

  1. Lakowicz, J.R. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ye, C.; Periasamy, A. Characterization of two-photon excitation fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy for protein location. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2004, 63, 72–80. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ardeshirpour, Y.; Chernomordik, V.; Hassan, M.; Zielinski, R.; Capala, J.; Gandjbakhche, A. In vivo fluorescence lifetime imaging for monitoring the efficacy of the cancer treatment. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 2, 3531–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Becker, W. Fluorescence lifetime imaging-techniques and applications. J Microsc. 2012, 247, 119–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jahn, K.; Buschmann, V.; Hille, C. Simultaneous fluorescence and phosphorescence lifetime imaging microscopy in living cells. Sci. Rep. UK 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shcheslavskiy, V.I.; Neubauer, A.; Bukowiecki, R.; Dinter, F.; Becker, W. Combined fluorescence and phosphorescence lifetime imaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2016, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Berezin, M.Y.; Achilefu, S. Fluorescence lifetime measurements and biological imaging. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 2641–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Herman, P.; Maliwal, B.P.; Lin, H.J.; Lakowicz, J.R. Frequency-domain fluorescence microscopy with LED as a light source. J. Microsc. 2001, 203, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, R.F.; Naivar, M.A.; Wilder, M.; Houston, J.P. Expanding the potential of standard flow cytometry by extracting fluorescence lifetime form cytometric pulse shifts. Cytom. Part A 2014, 85, 999–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gohar, A.V.; Cao, R.F.; Jenkins, P.; Li, W.; Houson, K.D. Subcellular location-dependent changes inEGFP fluorescence lifetime measured by time resolved flow cytometry. Biomed. Opt. Express 2013, 4, 1930–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Steinkamp, J.A.; Crissman, H.A. Resolution of fluorescence signals from cells labeled with fluorochromes having different lifetimes by phase-sensitive flow cytometry. Cytometry 1993, 14, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deka, C.; Steinkamp, J.A. Time-resolved fluorescence-decay measurement and analysis on single cells by flow cytometry. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 4481–4489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cao, R.F.; Pankayatselvan, V.; Houston, J.P. Cytometric sorting based on the fluorescence lifetime of spectrally overlapping signals. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 14816–14831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Deka, C.; Sklar, L.A. Fluorescence lifetime measurements in a flow cytometer by ampliture demodulation using digital data acquisition technique. Cytometry 1994, 17, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pinsky, B.G.; Ladasky, J.J.; Lakowicz, J.R.; Berndt, K.; Hoffman, R.A. Phase-resolved fluorescence lifetime measurements for flow cytometry. Cytometry 1993, 14, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Houston, J.P.; Naivar, M.A.; Jenkins, P.; Freyer, J.P. Capture of fluorescence decay times by flow cytometry. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 2015, 59, 1.25.1–1.25.21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ke, Z.; Lin, J.; Yang, W. Phase-selective fluorescence of doped Ge2sb2Te5 phase-change memory thin films. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2015, 13, 121601–121604. [Google Scholar]
  18. Naivar, M.M.; Goodwin, P.M.; Graves, S.W. Single particle high resolution spectral analysis flow cytometry. Cytom. Part A 2008, 69A, 842–851. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zilmer, N.A.; Godavarti, M.; Rodriguez, J.J.; Yopp, T.A.; Galbraith, G.M. Flow cytometric analysis using digital signal processing. Cytometry 1995, 20, 102–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Feder, I.; Duadi, H.; Fixler, D. Experimental system for measuring the full scattering profile of circular phantoms. Biomed. Opt. Express 2015, 6, 2877–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Matti, K.; Antti, K.; Artashes, K. Effect of the size and shape of a red blood cell on elastic light scattering properties at the single-cell level. Biomed. Opt. Express 2011, 2, 1803–1811. [Google Scholar]
  22. Buryakina, T.Y.; Su, P.T.; Chang, C.A.; Fan, H.F.; Kao, F.J. Metabolism of HeLa cells revealed through autofluorescence lifetime upon infection with enterohe-morrhagic Escherichia coli. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bhandari, A.; Christopher, B.; Ramesh, R. Blind and reference-free fluorescence lifetime estimation via consumer time-of-flight sensors. Optica 2015, 2, 965–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Batista, A.; Breunig, H.G.; Uchugonova, A.; Morgado, A.M.; König, K. Two-photon spectral fluorescence lifetime and second-harmonic generation imaging of the porcine cornea with 12-femtosecond laser microscope. J. Biomed. Opt. 2016, 21, 036002.1–036002.11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ferrie, J.; Nawrocki, C.; Carter, G. Partitioned and modified chirp Z-transform: Signal processing technique for simultaneous multi-frequency evaluation of the surface reradiated spectrum in slowly varying environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering in the Ocean Environment, Seattle, WA, USA, 25–28 September 1973. [Google Scholar]
  26. Knapp, C.H.; Carter, G.C. The generalized correlation method for estimation of time delay. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 1976, 24, 320–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of fluorescence excitation process of the fluorescently labeled microsphere with three different fluorochromes.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of fluorescence excitation process of the fluorescently labeled microsphere with three different fluorochromes.
Sensors 18 00442 g001
Figure 2. Generation of forward-scattered and fluorescent light pulses while microsphere flows through the excitation volume. (Lfs(t): forward-scattered light pulse; Lfl1(t), Lfl2(t) and Lfl3(t): light pulse of fluorochromes 1, 2 and 3, respectively; L0: and L1: the upper and lower limbs of excitation volume, respectively).
Figure 2. Generation of forward-scattered and fluorescent light pulses while microsphere flows through the excitation volume. (Lfs(t): forward-scattered light pulse; Lfl1(t), Lfl2(t) and Lfl3(t): light pulse of fluorochromes 1, 2 and 3, respectively; L0: and L1: the upper and lower limbs of excitation volume, respectively).
Sensors 18 00442 g002
Figure 3. (a) The waveforms of fluorescent pulse signals with different lifetimes; (b) The change of pulse width of fluorescent signals with different lifetimes resulted from the threshold. (The intensity in this figure is used to represent relativeness with no units.)
Figure 3. (a) The waveforms of fluorescent pulse signals with different lifetimes; (b) The change of pulse width of fluorescent signals with different lifetimes resulted from the threshold. (The intensity in this figure is used to represent relativeness with no units.)
Sensors 18 00442 g003
Figure 4. Steps of time-delay estimation between fs and fl1. (a) Pulse signals of fs and fl1 after photovoltaic conversion and electronic systems; (b) Zoom frequency spectrum of fs(n) and fl1(n) calculated with MCZT, N1/N = 10; (c) Cross-correlation frequency spectrum calculated with FS_Z and FL1_Z; (d) Cross-correlation frequency spectrum period expansion by inserting zero, N2/N1 = 10; (e) Time domain cross-correlation function calculated with FICP. (Δt: time-delay between fs and fl1; n1: the time-delay estimation result).
Figure 4. Steps of time-delay estimation between fs and fl1. (a) Pulse signals of fs and fl1 after photovoltaic conversion and electronic systems; (b) Zoom frequency spectrum of fs(n) and fl1(n) calculated with MCZT, N1/N = 10; (c) Cross-correlation frequency spectrum calculated with FS_Z and FL1_Z; (d) Cross-correlation frequency spectrum period expansion by inserting zero, N2/N1 = 10; (e) Time domain cross-correlation function calculated with FICP. (Δt: time-delay between fs and fl1; n1: the time-delay estimation result).
Sensors 18 00442 g004
Figure 5. Time-delay calibration. The LED1 emission light is blue and the LED2 emission light is red; S_fs is forward-scattered light pulse, S_fl1 is the fluorescence light pulse. (a) Light-pulse time-delay calibration. H0(ω) is the frequency-domain transfer function of electric system 0; (b) Hardware time-delay calibration. H1(ω) is the frequency-domain transfer function of electric system 1.
Figure 5. Time-delay calibration. The LED1 emission light is blue and the LED2 emission light is red; S_fs is forward-scattered light pulse, S_fl1 is the fluorescence light pulse. (a) Light-pulse time-delay calibration. H0(ω) is the frequency-domain transfer function of electric system 0; (b) Hardware time-delay calibration. H1(ω) is the frequency-domain transfer function of electric system 1.
Sensors 18 00442 g005
Figure 6. Cytometric pulse signals from single cell stained with three-color reagents simultaneously. Four AD9446-100 (100 MSPS) are used for the analogy-to-digital conversation.
Figure 6. Cytometric pulse signals from single cell stained with three-color reagents simultaneously. Four AD9446-100 (100 MSPS) are used for the analogy-to-digital conversation.
Sensors 18 00442 g006
Figure 7. (a) Cross-correlation function of fs(n) and flm(n) in time-domain calculated with FICP (N2/N1 = 50). The red curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl1(n); the blue curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl2(n); the black curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl3(n); (b) Peak detail of cross-correlation function of fs(n) and fl2(n) in (a).
Figure 7. (a) Cross-correlation function of fs(n) and flm(n) in time-domain calculated with FICP (N2/N1 = 50). The red curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl1(n); the blue curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl2(n); the black curves are the cross-correlation functions of fs(n) and fl3(n); (b) Peak detail of cross-correlation function of fs(n) and fl2(n) in (a).
Sensors 18 00442 g007
Figure 8. Gauss fitting results of pulse signals (fs, fl1, fl2 and fl3). (a) Results of pulse signal fs; (b) Results of pulse signal fl1; (c) Results of pulse signal fl2; (d) Results of pulse signal fl3.
Figure 8. Gauss fitting results of pulse signals (fs, fl1, fl2 and fl3). (a) Results of pulse signal fs; (b) Results of pulse signal fl1; (c) Results of pulse signal fl2; (d) Results of pulse signal fl3.
Sensors 18 00442 g008
Figure 9. Fluorescence pulse signals after normalization. The intensity is used to indicate the relative relationship with no units.
Figure 9. Fluorescence pulse signals after normalization. The intensity is used to indicate the relative relationship with no units.
Sensors 18 00442 g009
Figure 10. Calculated pulse width variation with different lifetimes. The blank curve marked with “x” represents the results acquired using Equation (2). The red points are the results of proposed method in this work.
Figure 10. Calculated pulse width variation with different lifetimes. The blank curve marked with “x” represents the results acquired using Equation (2). The red points are the results of proposed method in this work.
Sensors 18 00442 g010
Table 1. Results of Gauss fitting and evaluation indexes.
Table 1. Results of Gauss fitting and evaluation indexes.
SignalsConversion Rate (MSPS)Curves Fitting ResultsEvaluation Indexes
K1K2K3RMSER-Squared
fs5000.73572065639.30.02010.9928
1000.7386412.3128.90.02010.9928
fl15001.3092446615.80.01820.9981
1001.308488.31230.01810.9982
fl25002.9012440611.60.02900.9990
1002.898486.91220.02760.9991
fl35001.4752453625.90.02880.9963
1001.475489.5125.20.02860.9964
Table 2. Results of time-delay estimation.
Table 2. Results of time-delay estimation.
Peak Location (ns)Time-Delay (ns)
fsfl1fl2fl3Δt1Δt2Δt3
FICP----------------765.6748.4772.6
Curve fitting500 MSPS4130489248804906762750776
100 MSPS4123488348694895760746772
Table 3. Statistical results of fluorescence lifetime.
Table 3. Statistical results of fluorescence lifetime.
τ1τ2τ3
Mean (ns)SD (ns)RSD (%)Mean (ns)SD (ns)RSD (%)Mean (ns)SD (ns)RSD(%)
FICP7.361.5818.904.851.1623.9210.331.6515.97
Curve fitting500 MSPS7.241.7621.364.921.2425.2010.411.8818.06
100 MSPS7.171.9323.625.111.5931.1211.542.1318.46

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, L.; Zhang, W.; Dong, M.; Lou, X. Analysis of Flow Cytometric Fluorescence Lifetime with Time-Delay Estimation of Pulse Signals. Sensors 2018, 18, 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020442

AMA Style

Zhu L, Zhang W, Dong M, Lou X. Analysis of Flow Cytometric Fluorescence Lifetime with Time-Delay Estimation of Pulse Signals. Sensors. 2018; 18(2):442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020442

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Lianqing, Wenchang Zhang, Mingli Dong, and Xiaoping Lou. 2018. "Analysis of Flow Cytometric Fluorescence Lifetime with Time-Delay Estimation of Pulse Signals" Sensors 18, no. 2: 442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020442

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop