Next Article in Journal
Energy-Based Metrics for Arthroscopic Skills Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
A Study of Thermistor Performance within a Textile Structure
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multiscale Approach to the Smart Deployment of Micro-Sensors over Lightweight Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Biosensor Based on the Regulatory Effect of Glucose on Electrochemical Behaviors of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles on MoS2 †

1
Department of Chemistry, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83201, USA
2
Department of Anthropology, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID 83201, USA
3
Present address: Department of Chemistry, Grand View University, Des Moines, IA 50316, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is an extended version of our paper published in Ma, X. A Highly Sensitive Non-Enzymatic Glucose Biosensor Based on Regulatory Effect of Glucose on Electrochemical Behaviors of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles on MoS2. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Electronic Conference on Sensors and Applications, 15–30 November 2016.
Sensors 2017, 17(8), 1807; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081807
Submission received: 31 May 2017 / Revised: 25 July 2017 / Accepted: 26 July 2017 / Published: 5 August 2017

Abstract

:
A novel and highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose biosensor was developed by nucleating colloidal silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) on MoS2. The facile fabrication method, high reproducibility (97.5%) and stability indicates a promising capability for large-scale manufacturing. Additionally, the excellent sensitivity (9044.6 μA·mM−1·cm−2), low detection limit (0.03 μM), appropriate linear range of 0.1–1000 μM, and high selectivity suggests that this biosensor has a great potential to be applied for noninvasive glucose detection in human body fluids, such as sweat and saliva.

1. Introduction

As of 2015, 415 million people suffer from diabetes worldwide, and 318 million people are at high risk of developing the disease in the future [1]. Diabetes is a chronic medical condition in which levels of glucose in the blood are raised significantly from the normal range. The high levels of glucose in the blood will eventually cause damage to many tissues in the body, including heart, eyes, kidneys and nerves, leading to painful and life-threatening health complications. According to the International Diabetes Federation, every six seconds a person dies from the health complications associated with diabetes. However, these complications can be prevented or controlled by monitoring blood glucose levels. Accordingly, millions of diabetics test their blood glucose levels daily, which makes glucose the most commonly tested analyte [2].
Since the first invention of glucose enzyme electrodes by Clark and Lyons in 1962 [3], a tremendous amount of research has been dedicated in developing enzyme-based biosensors [4,5,6,7], which rely on the catalytic activity of glucose oxidase (GOx) towards glucose in the blood [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, this strategy has two fundamental drawbacks: first, the painful blood drawing process may prevent patients from their daily (or more frequently) blood sample testing; and second, the GOx enzyme is relatively fragile and expensive. Recent studies have showed a strong correlation between the glucose levels in human blood and those in other body fluids, such as sweat [20] and saliva [21]. For example, sweat glucose that was properly harvested to prevent contamination from other sources on the skin accurately reflected the blood glucose levels of patients [20]. The concentrations of glucose in these biofluids are in the μM range [20,22]. Thus, the development of nonintrusive, inexpensive and nonenzymatic glucose biosensors that are sensitive enough to effectively detect glucose in alternative body fluids of sweat and saliva is in great need.
MoS2 (molybdenum disulfide), a two-dimensional material with large surface area, rich surface chemistry, excellent biocompatibility, and a weakly bonded and layered structure, has attracted scientists’ attention in a variety of fields in recent years [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. While the unique atomic structure of MoS2 allows easy intercalation of metal atoms or ions [34,35], MoS2-based electrochemical devices suffer from unsatisfactory performance due to its poor intrinsic conductivity. As such, conductive additives have been employed to improve the electrochemical performance of MoS2 [36,37,38]. In this context, introducing noble metal nanoparticles, such as silver [39], as a conductive additive shall address this inadequacy and achieve an improved electrochemical performance.
Here, colloidal AgNPs were synthesized in the presence of MoS2, which was used to fabricate highly sensitive, nonenzymatic biosensors for the detection of relatively low glucose levels in human sweat and saliva. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of colloidal AgNPs/MoS2-based nonenzymatic glucose biosensor.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Materials

Silver nitrite (>99% AgNO3), sodium borohydride (99% NaBH4), glucose, glycine, urea, l-phenylalanine, l-lactic acid and l-tyrosine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). MoS2 powder (10–30 μm) was obtained from Rose Mill Co. (West Hartford, CT, USA). All other reagents and chemicals were of analytical grade and were used as received without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of AgNPs/MoS2 Modified Electrodes

The MoS2 powder was added to deionized water at an initial concentration of 50 mg·mL−1, and then subjected to sonication at 500 W for 60 min. The obtained slurry was set overnight. Then the supernatant was collected and mixed with AgNO3. The mixture, containing 1.0 mM AgNO3, was added dropwise to 2.0 mM NaBH4 that had been cooled in an ice bath, while stirred vigorously. When the solution turned light yellow, any further addition of the mixture and stirring was stopped immediately. The clear yellow solution was stable at room temperature when stored in a sealed vial in the dark for several months. The yellow solution of AgNPs/MoS2 was used for electrode modification and subjected to structural characterizations later.
The AgNPs/MoS2 modified electrode was fabricated by coating various amounts of AgNPs/MoS2 solution onto the surface of polished glassy carbon (GC) electrodes. 20 μL of AgNPs/MoS2 gave the highest electrochemical response. After an overnight drying process, the electrode was carefully rinsed with water, dried again at room temperature, and then used for electrochemical measurements.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

Electrochemical measurements were performed on a PGSTAT204 electrochemical workstation (Metrohm, Houston, TX, USA) in a three-electrode electrochemical cell at room temperature of 25 °C. The AgNPs or AgNPs/MoS2-modified GC electrode was used as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, and Pt wire as the counter electrode. CVs (cyclic voltammetry) were obtained with a potential window of −0.50 to 0.50 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in 0.1 M NaOH solution. SWV (square wave voltammetry) measurements were carried out with a potential window of 0.10–0.60 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in 0.1 M NaOH solution at a frequency of 10 Hz. A magnetic stirring was applied to the solution during SWV measurements to achieve convective mass transfer.

2.4. Materials Characterization

UV-Vis absorption spectroscopic measurements were performed using Evolution 300 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology of the AgNPs/MoS2 modified electrode was determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (LEO 1430 VP, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany), energy-dispersive X-ray (EDS) analysis, and atomic force microscopy (AFM) (Nexus One, NT-MDT, Tempe, AZ, USA). AFM measurements were performed in AC mode in 0.1 M NaOH solution with and without 1 mM glucose at room temperature on freshly cleaved mica.

2.5. Real Sample Collection and Preparation

One male participant was recruited for this study. Written consent was sought prior to commencement of the study and ethical approval was provided by the Human Subjects Committee, Idaho State University, US (Reference IRB-FY2017-304).
Saliva samples (~1 mL) were collected using a passive drool method without stimulation. Samples were collected into plastic vials and stored at −20 °C until analysis. After thawing and centrifugation, the samples were diluted 1:1 volume ratio with 0.2 M NaOH solutions so that the final concentration of NaOH was 0.1 M. 0.1 M NaOH was chosen as a standard testing solution, because it removes concerns about the impact of pH and ionic strength in different samples on the performance of the biosensor. However, alkaline solution may denature the biomolecules in samples, which may interfere with reliable detections of glucose. If large amount of denatured biomolecules, such as proteins, are observed, further purification steps (centrifugation, liquid chromatography, etc.) may be necessary.

3. Results

3.1. Materials Characterization of the Biosensor

SEM images of AgNPs/MoS2 showed that AgNPs exhibited a three-dimensional porous network structure (Figure 1a). Clusters of AgNPs, with a diameter of 1–7 μm, distributed unevenly on the surface. The size of the clusters was comparable to that of MoS2 flakes (~10 μm). The average diameter of AgNPs within the clusters was estimated to be ~5 nm, which was supported by UV-Vis spectrum (Figure 1b): the wavelength of the plasmon absorption maximum was near 390 nm, indicating a particle size of 5 nm [40]. The EDS spectrum of the AgNPs/MoS2 film confirmed the co-existence of Ag and Mo (molecular weight ratio of Ag/Mo is 20:1), suggesting that AgNPs were nucleated on MoS2 layers. In solution AFM images also showed that AgNPs were firmly attached on MoS2, or otherwise, they would not be observed. (Figure S1).

3.2. Electrochemical Behavior

Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of the AgNPs and AgNPs/MoS2 electrodes showed an enhanced electrochemical reactivity of AgNPs/MoS2 compared with AgNPs only (Figure 2a). Two anodic peaks at 0.31 and 0.36 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) may represent the oxidation of Ag to Ag+ and Ag+ to Ag2+, while two cathodic peaks at −0.01 and −0.04 V may be associated with the reversible conversion of Ag2+ back to Ag. The electrochemical redox phenomena of Ag/Ag+/Ag2+ which occur at the working electrode surface in a basic solution can be represented as follows:
Ag + OH ↔ AgOH + e
AgOH + OH ↔ Ag(OH)2 + e
Ag2+ normally requires a higher potential than 0.36 V to be generated. Here, we attribute the electrochemical signal at 0.36 V to the oxidation of Ag+ to Ag2+, because when the size of AgNPs comes to the rage of ~10 nm, the activation energy required for the oxidation of Ag+ to Ag2+ may be significantly reduced, potentially due to a decrease in interfacial energy and an increase in the portion of surface/interface atoms. However, other mechanistic representations may also be considered.
The potential scan rate (υ) was observed to be linearly related to the currents of both oxidation and reduction peaks (Figure 2b), a characteristic of diffusionless, thin-layer electrochemical behavior. The linear regression equations, y = 5.3636 + 1.6275x and y = −6.0773 − 1.6197x, and the regression coefficients, 0.9995 and 0.9987, were obtained for oxidation and reduction peaks, respectively. In addition, the Epa and Epc are linearly dependent on the logarithm of the scan rate (Figure 2c). Laviron’s model [41] gives:
E p a = E θ +   R T ( 1 α ) n F l n ( 1 α ) F n υ R T K s
E p c =   E θ   R T α n F l n α F n υ R T K s
l o g k s = α log ( 1 α ) + ( 1 α ) l o g α l o g R T n F υ     α ( 1 α ) n F E p 2.3 R T
where n is the number of electrons transferred in the rate determining step, ∆Ep is the peak potential separation, υ is the scan rate, and R, T, and F are constants (R = 8.314 J·mol−1·K−1, T = 298 K, F = 96,485 C·mol−1). The electron-transfer coefficient (α) and apparent charge-transfer constant (ks) were thereby calculated to be 0.68 and 17.55 s−1, respectively, indicating that electron transfer was effectively promoted on the AgNPs/MoS2 electrode.

3.3. Glucose Detection

Square wave voltammetry (SWV) was employed for the detection of glucose due to its high sensitivity and speed. After the electrode was stabilized in 0.1 M NaOH by running 10 times of SWV, solutions of glucose with different concentrations were added successively to the system. The current of the anodic peak decreased with increase of glucose concentrations (Figure 3a), suggesting an inhibitory effect of glucose on the electrochemical reactivity of the biosensor. This effect was reversible, as the biosensor regained its full electrochemical reactivity when the electrode was rinsed and inserted back into 0.1 M NaOH without glucose even after several repeated processes (Figure S2). We also observed that when the inhibitory effect was saturated (at a glucose concentration >4 mM), the current of the anodic peak reached 8.0 μA, similar to the one of the electrode modified with AgNPs only (Figure 2a). In-solution AFM images showed that the thickness of MoS2 layers increased when glucose was added (Figure S1). These results imply that the regulation of the electrochemical reactivity by glucose takes effect by separating MoS2 layers, which prevents them from facilitating electron transfers between AgNPs and the electrode. Further studies are needed to determine detailed mechanisms of glucose regulation.
The current-concentration curve (Figure 3b) showed a linear relationship in the range of 100 nM to 1 mM of glucose concentration, with a sensitivity of 9044.6 μA·mM−1·cm−2 (I (μA) = −0.284 × C (mM) + 375.14 (R2 = 0.9995)). The limit of detection (LoD) was estimated to be 0.03 μM (S/N = 3). This LoD is two orders lower than the glucose concentration in sweat and saliva in healthy patient, 8.3–120 μM [42,43]. Therefore, the AgNPs/MoS2 biosensor can be readily applied for noninvasive glucose detection in sweat and saliva. Both the sensitivity and LoD of the AgNPs/MoS2 biosensor are superior to those of previously reported enzymatic and nonenzymatic biosensors (Table 1). We attribute the enhanced performance of the biosensor to high conductivity of Ag, large surface-to-volume ratio of the AgNPs nanostructure, large surface area of MoS2 and the precise regulation of glucose on electrochemical behaviors of AgNPs on MoS2.

3.4. Selectivity, Stability and Reproducibility of the Biosensor

Selectivity of the AgNPs/MoS2 biosensor was evaluated by adding interfering substances commonly found in sweat and saliva, including 0.02 mM glycine (Gly), urea, l-phenylalanine (L-Phe), l-lactic acid (L-LA), l-tyrosine (L-Tyr), ascorbic acid (VC), paracetamol (APAP), alcohol (EtOH) and 0.2 mM NaCl and CaCl2 into the system. The biosensor showed no response towards Gly, urea, L-Phe, L-LA, NaCl and CaCl2, and only slight response (<5%) to L-Tyr and APAP (Figure 4a), indicating high selectivity of the biosensor towards glucose detection.
The stability and reproducibility of the biosensor were also evaluated. The stability was examined by recording 100 consecutive CV curves in 0.1 M NaOH, and after the electrode was stored in the 4 °C refrigerator for 10 days. No obvious change in peak current was observed (Figure 4b), indicating a good stability of the biosensor. The reproducibility was examined by testing five different AgNPs/MoS2 fabricated independently for their current response to glucose. From results shown in Figure 4c, a reproducibility rate of >97.5% is calculated, indicating that the biosensor is highly reproducible.

3.5. Glucose Detection in Real Samples

The practical application of the biosensor was evaluated by adding glucose to human sweat or saliva samples. The recovery tests were performed and the results were listed in Table 2. The recoveries of the glucose concentration obtained by standard additions of glucose to real human samples ranged from 97% to 99.5%. These results suggest that the AgNPs/MoS2 biosensor can be used practically to detect glucose in real biological samples.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

A highly sensitive nonenzymatic glucose biosensor was developed using inexpensive fabrication method and biocompatible materials. The detection of glucose was achieved by a mechanism where glucose precisely regulates the electrochemical reactivity of AgNPs through potentially physical separation of AgNPs and MoS2. The porous nanostructures of AgNPs and large surface areas of MoS2 enhanced the interactive sites between AgNPs and electrode/glucose, contributing to accelerated electron transfer of AgNPs and the high sensitivity of the biosensor. The biosensor exhibited excellent sensitivity, stability and reproducibility, low LoD, and high selectivity, suggesting a novel candidate for noninvasive glucose monitoring for patients with diabetes. Further, the mechanism of action and facile fabrication method offer a novel approach for the development of other nonenzymatic biosensors and large-scale manufacturing. Future studies will be needed to employ the biosensor for in vivo and real time glucose detections.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/8/1807/s1, Figure S1: Reversibility of the Regulatory Effect. The ratio of the peak current of the AgNPs/MoS2 electrode after repeatedly performing glucose detection in the solution containing glucose and then being brought back to 0.1 M NaOH, to the initial peak current. Figure S2: Reversibility of the Regulatory Effect. The ratio of the peak current of the Ag NPs/MoS2 electrode after repeatedly performing glucose detection in the solution containing glucose and then being brought back to 0.1 M NaOH, to the initial peak current.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Chemistry and Idaho State University. We thank Rene Rodriguez for his generous support.

Author Contributions

K.A. and X.M. conceived and designed the experiments; K.A. and X.M. performed the synthetic, electrochemical and UV-vis experiments; B.P. and J.D. performed SEM and EDS experiments; K.A., B.P. and X.M. analyzed the data; K.A., S.L. and X.M. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Israel Defense Forces. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 7th ed.; International Diabetes Federation: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  2. Xue, Z.; Huang, J.; Joseph, W. Electrochemical Sensors, Biosensors and Their Biomedical Applications, 1st ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark, L.C.; Lyons, C. Electrode systems for continuous monitoring in cardiovascular surgery. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102, 29–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, C.; Tao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Xiang, Y.; Li, G. In vitro analysis of DNA—Protein interactions in gene transcription using dnazyme-based electrochemical assay. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 5003–5007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Li, W.; Li, H.; Wu, S.; Feng, C.; Li, G. Highly sensitive protein detection based on dnazyme cycling activated surface assembly of peptide decorated nanoparticles. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 71, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, L.; Mao, X.; Li, G. Highly sensitive protein detection based on smart hybrid nanocomposite-controlled switch of DNA polymerase activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 28202–28207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Feng, C.; Mao, X.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Yin, Y.; Li, G. Rolling circle amplification in electrochemical biosensor with biomedical applications. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2016, 781, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sternberg, R.; Barrau, M.-B.; Gangiotti, L.; Thévenot, D.R.; Bindra, D.S.; Wilson, G.S.; Velho, G.; Froguel, P.; Reach, G. Study and development of multilayer needle-type enzyme-based glucose microsensors. Biosensors 1989, 4, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, Y.; Wilson, G.S. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of oxygen effects on a glucose oxidase based implantable glucose sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 1993, 281, 513–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, S.; Ju, H. Reagentless glucose biosensor based on direct electron transfer of glucose oxidase immobilized on colloidal gold modified carbon paste electrode. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 19, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Feng, X.; Cheng, H.; Pan, Y.; Zheng, H. Development of glucose biosensors based on nanostructured graphene-conducting polyaniline composite. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 70, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Han, L.; Shao, C.; Liang, B.; Liu, A. Genetically engineered phage-templated MnO2 nanowires: synthesis and their application in electrochemical glucose biosensor operated at neutral pH condition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 13768–13776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chaichi, M.J.; Ehsani, M. A novel glucose sensor based on immobilization of glucose oxidase on the chitosan-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles and the luminol–H2O2–gold nanoparticle chemiluminescence detection system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 713–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, Y.; Liang, B.; Fang, L.; Ma, G.; Yang, G.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, S.; Ye, X. Antifouling zwitterionic coating via electrochemically mediated atom transfer radical polymerization on enzyme-based glucose sensors for long-time stability in 37 °C serum. Langmuir 2016, 32, 11763–11770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, J.; Sheng, Q.; Shen, Y.; Zheng, J. Enhanced direct electron transfer of glucose oxidase based on gold nanoprism and its application in biosensing. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2017, 529, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kausaite-Minkstimiene, A.; Simanaityte, R.; Ramanaviciene, A.; Glumbokaite, L.; Ramanavicius, A. Reagent-less amperometric glucose biosensor based on a graphite rod electrode layer-by-layer modified with 1, 10-phenanthroline-5, 6-dione and glucose oxidase. Talanta 2017, 171, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Shen, X.; Xia, X.; Du, Y.; Ye, W.; Wang, C. Amperometric glucose biosensor based on aupd modified reduced graphene oxide/polyimide film with glucose oxidase. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, B285–B291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mehmeti, E.; Stanković, D.M.; Chaiyo, S.; Zavasnik, J.; Žagar, K.; Kalcher, K. Wiring of glucose oxidase with graphene nanoribbons: An electrochemical third generation glucose biosensor. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gong, C.; Chen, J.; Song, Y.; Sun, M.; Song, Y.; Guo, Q.; Wang, L. A glucose biosensor based on the polymerization of aniline induced by a bio-interphase of glucose oxidase and horseradish peroxidase. Anal. Methods 2016, 8, 1513–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moyer, J.; Wilson, D.; Finkelshtein, I.; Wong, B.; Potts, R. Correlation between sweat glucose and blood glucose in subjects with diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2012, 14, 398–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Panchbhai, A.S. Correlation of salivary glucose level with blood glucose level in diabetes mellitus. J. Oral Maxillofac. Res. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jurysta, C.; Bulur, N.; Oguzhan, B.; Satman, I.; Yilmaz, T.M.; Malaisse, W.J.; Sener, A. Salivary glucose concentration and excretion in normal and diabetic subjects. BioMed Res. Int. 2009, 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Radisavljevic, B.; Radenovic, A.; Brivio, J.; Giacometti, I.V.; Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Yin, Z.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Jiang, L.; Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Lu, G.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, X.; Zhang, H. Single-Layer MoS2 Phototransistors. ACS Nano 2011, 6, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lopez-Sanchez, O.; Lembke, D.; Kayci, M.; Radenovic, A.; Kis, A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chhowalla, M.; Amaratunga, G.A. Thin Films of Fullerene-Like MoS2 Nanoparticles with Ultra-Low Friction and Wear. Nature 2000, 407, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, H.; Yu, L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Shi, Y.; Hsu, A.; Chin, M.L.; Li, L.-J.; Dubey, M.; Kong, J.; Palacios, T. Integrated circuits based on bilayer MoS2 transistors. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 4674–4680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Acerce, M.; Voiry, D.; Chhowalla, M. Metallic 1t phase MoS2 nanosheets as supercapacitor electrode materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 313–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cui, X.; Lee, G.-H.; Kim, Y.D.; Arefe, G.; Huang, P.Y.; Lee, C.-H.; Chenet, D.A.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Ye, F. Multi-terminal transport measurements of MoS2 using a van der Waals heterostructure device platform. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sangwan, V.K.; Jariwala, D.; Kim, I.S.; Chen, K.-S.; Marks, T.J.; Lauhon, L.J.; Hersam, M.C. Gate-Tunable Memristive Phenomena Mediated by Grain Boundaries in Single-Layer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 403–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Voiry, D.; Fullon, R.; Yang, J.; Silva, C.C.C.; Kappera, R.; Bozkurt, I.; Kaplan, D.; Lagos, M.J.; Batson, P.E.; Gupta, G.; et al. The role of electronic coupling between substrate and 2D MoS2 nanosheets in electrocatalytic production of hydrogen. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 1003–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, H.; Tsai, C.; Koh, A.L.; Cai, L.; Contryman, A.W.; Fragapane, A.H.; Zhao, J.; Han, H.S.; Manoharan, H.C.; Abild-Pedersen, F. Activating and optimizing MoS2 basal planes for hydrogen evolution through the formation of strained sulphur vacancies. Nat. Mater. 2016, 15, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Liu, C.; Kong, D.; Hsu, P.-C.; Yuan, H.; Lee, H.-W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.; Wang, S.; Yan, K.; Lin, D. Rapid water disinfection using vertically aligned MoS2 nanofilms and visible light. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 11, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Woollam, J.A.; Somoano, R.B. Physics and chemistry of MoS2 intercalation compounds. Mater. Sci. Eng. 1977, 31, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benavente, E.; Santa Ana, M.; Mendizábal, F.; González, G. Intercalation chemistry of molybdenum disulfide. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2002, 224, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, J.Z.; Lu, L.; Lotya, M.; Coleman, J.N.; Chou, S.L.; Liu, H.K.; Minett, A.I.; Chen, J. Development of MoS2–CNT composite thin film from layered MoS2 for lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 798–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yu, H.; Ma, C.; Ge, B.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhu, C.; Li, C.; Ouyang, Q.; Gao, P.; Li, J. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Architectures Constructed by Graphene/MoS2 Nanoflake Arrays and Their Rapid Charging/Discharging properties as Lithium-Ion Battery Anodes. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 5818–5823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Pan, L.; Liu, Y.T.; Xie, X.M.; Zhu, X.D. Coordination-driven hierarchical assembly of silver nanoparticles on MoS2 nanosheets for improved lithium storage. Chem Asian J. 2014, 9, 1519–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Li, J.; Gao, T.; Gu, S.; Zhi, J.; Yang, J.; Li, G. An electrochemical biosensor for the assay of alpha-fetoprotein-L3 with practical applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Baset, S.; Akbari, H.; Zeynali, H.; Shafie, M. Size measurement of metal and semiconductor nanoparticles via UV-Vis absorption spectra. Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostruct. 2011, 6, 709–716. [Google Scholar]
  41. Laviron, E. General expression of the linear potential sweep voltammogram in the case of diffusionless electrochemical systems. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1979, 101, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yamaguchi, M.; Mitsumori, M.; Kano, Y. Noninvasively measuring blood glucose using saliva. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. 1998, 17, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Makaram, P.; Owens, D.; Aceros, J. Trends in nanomaterial-based noninvasive diabetes sensing technologies. Diagnostics 2014, 4, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kundu, M.K.; Sadhukhan, M.; Barman, S. Ordered assemblies of silver nanoparticles on carbon nitride sheets and their application in the nonenzymatic sensing of hydrogen peroxide and glucose. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 1289–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fang, B.; Gu, A.; Wang, G.; Wang, W.; Feng, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X. Silver oxide nanowalls grown on Cu substrate as an enzymeless glucose sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2009, 1, 2829–2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tehrani, F.; Bavarian, B. Facile and scalable disposable sensor based on laser engraved graphene for electrochemical detection of glucose. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ahmad, R.; Vaseem, M.; Tripathy, N.; Hahn, Y.-B. Wide linear-range detecting nonenzymatic glucose biosensor based on CuO nanoparticles inkjet-printed on electrodes. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 10448–10454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Shi, W.; Ma, Z. Amperometric glucose biosensor based on a triangular silver nanoprisms/chitosan composite film as immobilization matrix. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Luo, Z.; Yuwen, L.; Han, Y.; Tian, J.; Zhu, X.; Weng, L.; Wang, L. Reduced graphene oxide/pamam-silver nanoparticles nanocomposite modified electrode for direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and glucose sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2012, 36, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Kumar-Krishnan, S.; Chakaravarthy, S.; Hernandez-Rangel, A.; Prokhorov, E.; Luna-Bárcenas, G.; Esparza, R.; Meyyappan, M. Chitosan supported silver nanowires as a platform for direct electrochemistry and highly sensitive electrochemical glucose biosensing. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 20102–20108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Materials Characterization. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of colloidal AgNPs nucleated on MoS2; (b) UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs and AgNPs/MoS2.
Figure 1. Materials Characterization. (a) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of colloidal AgNPs nucleated on MoS2; (b) UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs and AgNPs/MoS2.
Sensors 17 01807 g001
Figure 2. Electrochemical Characterization. (a) CV (cyclic voltammetry) curves of AgNPs and AgNPs/MoS2 electrodes in 0.1 M NaOH at a scan rate of 0.1 V·s−1; (b) Peak currents versus scan rate (ν); (c) Peak potential versus ln ν.
Figure 2. Electrochemical Characterization. (a) CV (cyclic voltammetry) curves of AgNPs and AgNPs/MoS2 electrodes in 0.1 M NaOH at a scan rate of 0.1 V·s−1; (b) Peak currents versus scan rate (ν); (c) Peak potential versus ln ν.
Sensors 17 01807 g002
Figure 3. Glucose Detection. (a) Square wave voltammetry (SWV) curves of the AgNPs/MoS2 electrode in 0.1 M NaOH containing 0.1, 10, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 750, 1000 and 2000 μM glucose, at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1; (b) The calibration curves of the biosensor.
Figure 3. Glucose Detection. (a) Square wave voltammetry (SWV) curves of the AgNPs/MoS2 electrode in 0.1 M NaOH containing 0.1, 10, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 750, 1000 and 2000 μM glucose, at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1; (b) The calibration curves of the biosensor.
Sensors 17 01807 g003
Figure 4. Selectivity, Stability and Reproducibility. (a) Changes of the peak current of the biosensor in the presence of 0.2 mM glucose, 0.02 mM Gly, urea, L-Phe, L-LA, L-Tyr, VC, APAP, EtOH and 0.2 mM NaCl and CaCl2; (b) SWV curves of the biosensor collected immediately after fabrication, after performing 100 CV cycles, and after being stored in the 4 °C refrigerator for 10 days, in 0.1 M NaOH; (c) Changes of the peak current recorded using five different biosensors in 0.1 M NaOH containing 0.2 mM glucose.
Figure 4. Selectivity, Stability and Reproducibility. (a) Changes of the peak current of the biosensor in the presence of 0.2 mM glucose, 0.02 mM Gly, urea, L-Phe, L-LA, L-Tyr, VC, APAP, EtOH and 0.2 mM NaCl and CaCl2; (b) SWV curves of the biosensor collected immediately after fabrication, after performing 100 CV cycles, and after being stored in the 4 °C refrigerator for 10 days, in 0.1 M NaOH; (c) Changes of the peak current recorded using five different biosensors in 0.1 M NaOH containing 0.2 mM glucose.
Sensors 17 01807 g004
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of several electrochemical glucose biosensors.
Table 1. Comparison of the performance of several electrochemical glucose biosensors.
SensorLoD (μM)Sensitivity (μA·mM−1·cm−2)Linear Range (μM)Reference
GC/Colloidal AgNPs/MoS20.039044.60.1–1000This work
GC/Ag-CNx0.6971–100[44]
GC/Cu-Ag2O NWs10298.2200–3200[45]
CuNCs-DLEG0.25453225–4500[46]
CuO NPs/Ag/Si0.52762.550–18,450[47]
Pt/AgTNPs/CHIT/GOx167.173–3000[48]
rGO/PAMAM/Ag/GOx4.575.7232–1890[49]
AgNWs/CS/GOx2.116.721000–15,000[50]
Table 2. Detection of glucose in human samples.
Table 2. Detection of glucose in human samples.
SamplesGlucose Concentration of Samples (μM)Glucose Added (μM)Glucose Found (μM)Recovery (%)RSD (%)
Sweat80.71786.5498.61.1
100179.8299.51.1
Saliva7.42310.1197.01.7
2027.0298.51.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Anderson, K.; Poulter, B.; Dudgeon, J.; Li, S.-E.; Ma, X. A Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Biosensor Based on the Regulatory Effect of Glucose on Electrochemical Behaviors of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles on MoS2. Sensors 2017, 17, 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081807

AMA Style

Anderson K, Poulter B, Dudgeon J, Li S-E, Ma X. A Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Biosensor Based on the Regulatory Effect of Glucose on Electrochemical Behaviors of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles on MoS2. Sensors. 2017; 17(8):1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081807

Chicago/Turabian Style

Anderson, Kash, Benjamin Poulter, John Dudgeon, Shu-En Li, and Xiang Ma. 2017. "A Highly Sensitive Nonenzymatic Glucose Biosensor Based on the Regulatory Effect of Glucose on Electrochemical Behaviors of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles on MoS2" Sensors 17, no. 8: 1807. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081807

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop