Next Article in Journal
Parameters Identification of Fluxgate Magnetic Core Adopting the Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
A Robust and Multi-Weighted Approach to Estimating Topographically Correlated Tropospheric Delays in Radar Interferograms
Previous Article in Journal
An Approach to the Use of Depth Cameras for Weed Volume Estimation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensitivity Analysis of the Scattering-Based SARBM3D Despeckling Algorithm
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2016, 16(7), 973; doi:10.3390/s16070973

Comparison and Analysis of Geometric Correction Models of Spaceborne SAR

1
College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2
Equipment Academy of the Rocket Force, Beijing 100085, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Scott Palo
Received: 16 March 2016 / Revised: 16 June 2016 / Accepted: 22 June 2016 / Published: 25 June 2016
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [4177 KB, uploaded 25 June 2016]   |  

Abstract

Following the development of synthetic aperture radar (SAR), SAR images have become increasingly common. Many researchers have conducted large studies on geolocation models, but little work has been conducted on the available models for the geometric correction of SAR images of different terrain. To address the terrain issue, four different models were compared and are described in this paper: a rigorous range-doppler (RD) model, a rational polynomial coefficients (RPC) model, a revised polynomial (PM) model and an elevation derivation (EDM) model. The results of comparisons of the geolocation capabilities of the models show that a proper model for a SAR image of a specific terrain can be determined. A solution table was obtained to recommend a suitable model for users. Three TerraSAR-X images, two ALOS-PALSAR images and one Envisat-ASAR image were used for the experiment, including flat terrain and mountain terrain SAR images as well as two large area images. Geolocation accuracies of the models for different terrain SAR images were computed and analyzed. The comparisons of the models show that the RD model was accurate but was the least efficient; therefore, it is not the ideal model for real-time implementations. The RPC model is sufficiently accurate and efficient for the geometric correction of SAR images of flat terrain, whose precision is below 0.001 pixels. The EDM model is suitable for the geolocation of SAR images of mountainous terrain, and its precision can reach 0.007 pixels. Although the PM model does not produce results as precise as the other models, its efficiency is excellent and its potential should not be underestimated. With respect to the geometric correction of SAR images over large areas, the EDM model has higher accuracy under one pixel, whereas the RPC model consumes one third of the time of the EDM model. View Full-Text
Keywords: spaceborne SAR; geometric correction; Range-Doppler; rational polynomial; polynomial; elevation spaceborne SAR; geometric correction; Range-Doppler; rational polynomial; polynomial; elevation
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, W.; Yu, A.; Dong, Z.; Wang, Q. Comparison and Analysis of Geometric Correction Models of Spaceborne SAR. Sensors 2016, 16, 973.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top