Revision of J3Gen and Validity of the Attacks by Peinado et al.
AbstractThis letter is the reply to: Remarks on Peinado et al.’s Analysis of J3Gen by J. Garcia-Alfaro, J. Herrera-Joancomartí and J. Melià-Seguí published in Sensors 2015, 15, 6217–6220. Peinado et al. cryptanalyzed the pseudorandom number generator proposed by Melià-Seguí et al., describing two possible attacks. Later, Garcia-Alfaro claimed that one of this attack did not hold in practice because the assumptions made by Peinado et al. were not correct. This letter reviews those remarks, showing that J3Gen is anyway flawed and that, without further information, the interpretation made by Peinado et al. seems to be correct. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Peinado, A.; Munilla, J.; Fúster-Sabater, A. Revision of J3Gen and Validity of the Attacks by Peinado et al.. Sensors 2015, 15, 11988-11992.
Peinado A, Munilla J, Fúster-Sabater A. Revision of J3Gen and Validity of the Attacks by Peinado et al.. Sensors. 2015; 15(5):11988-11992.Chicago/Turabian Style
Peinado, Alberto; Munilla, Jorge; Fúster-Sabater, Amparo. 2015. "Revision of J3Gen and Validity of the Attacks by Peinado et al.." Sensors 15, no. 5: 11988-11992.