Open AccessThis article is
- freely available
A Comparative Analysis between Active and Passive Techniques for Underwater 3D Reconstruction of Close-Range Objects
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci 46/C–Rende, Cosenza 87036, Italy
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 9 July 2013; in revised form: 2 August 2013 / Accepted: 2 August 2013 / Published: 20 August 2013
Abstract: In some application fields, such as underwater archaeology or marine biology, there is the need to collect three-dimensional, close-range data from objects that cannot be removed from their site. In particular, 3D imaging techniques are widely employed for close-range acquisitions in underwater environment. In this work we have compared in water two 3D imaging techniques based on active and passive approaches, respectively, and whole-field acquisition. The comparison is performed under poor visibility conditions, produced in the laboratory by suspending different quantities of clay in a water tank. For a fair comparison, a stereo configuration has been adopted for both the techniques, using the same setup, working distance, calibration, and objects. At the moment, the proposed setup is not suitable for real world applications, but it allowed us to conduct a preliminary analysis on the performances of the two techniques and to understand their capability to acquire 3D points in presence of turbidity. The performances have been evaluated in terms of accuracy and density of the acquired 3D points. Our results can be used as a reference for further comparisons in the analysis of other 3D techniques and algorithms.
Keywords: 3D reconstruction; underwater imaging; active and passive 3D techniques
Article StatisticsClick here to load and display the download statistics.
Notes: Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Cite This Article
MDPI and ACS Style
Bianco, G.; Gallo, A.; Bruno, F.; Muzzupappa, M. A Comparative Analysis between Active and Passive Techniques for Underwater 3D Reconstruction of Close-Range Objects. Sensors 2013, 13, 11007-11031.
Bianco G, Gallo A, Bruno F, Muzzupappa M. A Comparative Analysis between Active and Passive Techniques for Underwater 3D Reconstruction of Close-Range Objects. Sensors. 2013; 13(8):11007-11031.
Bianco, Gianfranco; Gallo, Alessandro; Bruno, Fabio; Muzzupappa, Maurizio. 2013. "A Comparative Analysis between Active and Passive Techniques for Underwater 3D Reconstruction of Close-Range Objects." Sensors 13, no. 8: 11007-11031.