Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Change Detection Methodology by Means of Binary Thresholding Algorithms and Informational Fusion Processes
Previous Article in Journal
A Non-Destructive Distinctive Method for Discrimination of Automobile Lubricant Variety by Visible and Short-Wave Infrared Spectroscopy
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2012, 12(3), 3512-3527; doi:10.3390/s120303512

Inertial Sensing to Determine Movement Disorder Motion Present before and after Treatment

1
Department of Geomatics Engineering, 2500 University Drive NW, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada
2
Public Works Department, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Khalifa El-Maamon st, Abbasiya sq, Cairo 11566, Egypt
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 6 February 2012 / Revised: 5 March 2012 / Accepted: 5 March 2012 / Published: 12 March 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Sensors)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [722 KB, uploaded 21 June 2014]   |  

Abstract

There has been a lot of interest in recent years in using inertial sensors (accelerometers and gyroscopes) to monitor movement disorder motion and monitor the efficacy of treatment options. Two of the most prominent movement disorders, which are under evaluation in this research paper, are essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson’s disease (PD). These movement disorders are first evaluated to show that ET and PD motion often depict more (tremor) motion content in the 3–12 Hz frequency band of interest than control data and that such tremor motion can be characterized using inertial sensors. As well, coherence analysis is used to compare between pairs of many of the six degrees-of-freedom of motions under evaluation, to determine the similarity in tremor motion for the various degrees-of-freedom at different frequency bands of interest. It was quite surprising that this coherence analysis depicts that there is a statistically significant relationship using coherence analysis when differentiating between control and effectively medicated PD motion. The statistical analysis uncovers the novel finding that PD medication induced dyskinesia is depicted within coherence data from inertial signals. Dyskinesia is involuntary motion or the absence of intended motion, and it is a common side effect among medicated PD patients. The results show that inertial sensors can be used to differentiate between effectively medicated PD motion and control motion; such a differentiation can often be difficult to perform with the human eye because effectively medicated PD patients tend to not produce much tremor. As well, the finding that PD motion, when well medicated, does still differ significantly from control motion allows for researchers to quantify potential deficiencies in the use of medication. By using inertial sensors to spot such deficiencies, as outlined in this research paper, it is hoped that medications with even a larger degree of efficacy can be created in the future. View Full-Text
Keywords: accelerometer; gyroscope; Parkinson’s disease; essential tremor accelerometer; gyroscope; Parkinson’s disease; essential tremor
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Teskey, W.J.E.; Elhabiby, M.; El-Sheimy, N. Inertial Sensing to Determine Movement Disorder Motion Present before and after Treatment. Sensors 2012, 12, 3512-3527.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top