Next Article in Journal
Exogenous Application of Phytohormones Promotes Growth and Regulates Expression of Wood Formation-Related Genes in Populus simonii × P. nigra
Next Article in Special Issue
Root Proteomics Reveals the Effects of Wood Vinegar on Wheat Growth and Subsequent Tolerance to Drought Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Response of Tibetan Wild Barley Genotypes to Drought Stress and Identification of Quantitative Trait Loci by Genome-Wide Association Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Early Salinity Stress-Responsive Proteins in Dunaliella salina by isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ)-Based Quantitative Proteomic Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 20
Issue 3
10.3390/ijms20030788
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proteomics Analysis of E. angustifolia Seedlings Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Salt Stress

by
Tingting Jia
1,2,
Jian Wang
1,2,
Wei Chang
1,2,
Xiaoxu Fan
1,2,
Xin Sui
1,2 and
Fuqiang Song
1,2,*
1
Engineering Research Center of Agricultural Microbiology Technology, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150500, China
2
Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration and Resource Utilization for Cold Region, School of Life Sciences, Heilongjiang University, Harbin 150080, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20(3), 788; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030788
Submission received: 7 December 2018 / Revised: 29 January 2019 / Accepted: 1 February 2019 / Published: 12 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant Protein and Proteome Altlas--Integrated Omics Analyses of Plants under Abiotic Stresses)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
To reveal the mechanism of salinity stress alleviation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), we investigated the growth parameter, soluble sugar, soluble protein, and protein abundance pattern of E. angustifolia seedlings that were cultured under salinity stress (300 mmol/L NaCl) and inoculated by Rhizophagus irregularis (RI). Furthermore, a label-free quantitative proteomics approach was used to reveal the stress-responsive proteins in the leaves of E. angustifolia. The result indicates that the abundance of 75 proteins in the leaves was significantly influenced when E. angustifolia was inoculated with AMF, which were mainly involved in the metabolism, signal transduction, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. Furthermore, we identified chorismate mutase, elongation factor mitochondrial, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, calcium-dependent kinase, glutathione S-transferase, glutathione peroxidase, NADH dehydrogenase, alkaline neutral invertase, peroxidase, and other proteins closely related to the salt tolerance process. The proteomic results indicated that E. angustifolia seedlings inoculated with AMF increased the secondary metabolism level of phenylpropane metabolism, enhanced the signal transduction of Ca2+ and ROS scavenging ability, promoted the biosynthesis of protein, accelerated the protein folding, and inhibited the degradation of protein under salt stress. Moreover, AMF enhanced the synthesis of ATP and provided sufficient energy for plant cell activity. This study implied that symbiosis of halophytes and AMF has potential as an application for the improvement of saline-alkali soils.

1. Introduction

Salt stress is one of the most important abiotic stresses and limiting factors for plant growth and agricultural production. It is a major abiotic stress in the world. Land salinization causes many ecological and environmental problems, such as soil erosion, land desertification, forest and grassland degradation, and biodiversity reduction [1]. At present, along with the increase in soil salinization and secondary salinization, it is estimated that 30% of the arable land in the world will disappear in the next 25 years, and 50% by the middle of the 21st century [2,3]. Hence, the question of how to treat saline alkali soil has attracted widespread attention around the world. In recent years, it was demonstrated that using biological means to treat soil salinization is highly efficient, and environmental and sustainable, thus providing a new breakthrough method for saline alkali land treatment.
E. angustifolia, a member of the family, Elaeagaceae, is a deciduous tree that is widespread in the vast desert and semidesert in the Northwest of China. A few varieties of the species, E. angustifolia, can survive in the Gobi, such as the desert and saline, and is called the “treasure tree” locally. It is important to further improve the salt tolerance of E. angustifolia using biotechnology under saline-alkali conditions. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) exist widely in soil and form a mutualism system with most higher plants [4,5]. Plants are subjected to salt stress in the presence of a high salinity in the soil, which reduces the absorption and transport of water, inhibits the metabolic process, and affects nutrient absorption and the cell infiltration balance, resulting in the fragmentation of the horny layer of plants and leakage of the cell membrane. This leads to plant growth retardation. AMF can adapt to the saline soil habitat and survive in a heavy salt environment, indicating that AMF is adaptable to saline soil [6]. Previous studies have shown that symbiosis between AMF and plants under salt stress can promote plant growth and improve plant salt tolerance [7,8]. Therefore, the symbiosis of halophytes with AMF has great potential for the improvement of salt resistance and restoration of saline-alkali land, which has been a major research field globally.
Previous studies on the application of proteomics technology revealed the salt tolerance of plant leaves [9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, the response mechanism of mycorrhizal plants to salt stress needs to be further revealed. In this study, the symbiosis of AMF Rhizophagus irregularis (RI) and the salt-tolerant plant, E. angustifolia, was used as a breakthrough point. The stress-responsive proteomics in the leaves of E. angustifolia were detected under salt stress conditions. These results will provide more information for the understanding of the function of AMF in the improvement of plant salt tolerance.

2. Results

2.1. Growth of E. angustifolia under Salt Stress and Colonization of AMF in the Plant Roots

As shown in Figure 1A, both mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings grew well in the treatments lacking salt, but the mycorrhizal seedlings’ leaves grew stronger than the non-mycorrhizal seedlings; some leaves of the mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings were yellow during salt stress, however, the number of withered leaves of the mycorrhizal plants was significantly less than that of the non-mycorrhizal plants.
The typical AMF morphological structure was detected in inoculated E. angustifolia roots, including vesicles and arbuscules (Figure 1B). The maximum AMF colonization percentage of the root reached more than 90% at approximately 100 at approximately 30 days after inoculation. The maximum AM colonization percentage of the root reached more than 90% at approximately 30 days after salt stress. At the same time, no colonization was found in the non-inoculated seedlings. This result shows that E. angustifolia and R. irregularis established a vigorous symbiosis.

2.2. Effects of RI and CK on Height, Diameter, and Roots of E. angustifolia under Salt Stress

Salt stress decreased the height, diameter, length, and area, but mycorrhizal seedlings had a greater height, diameter, length, and area than non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress (Table 1). During the 300 mmol/L NaCl treatment, the height, diameter, length, and area of the mycorrhizal seedlings increased by 9.1%, 20.8%, 17.4%, and 35.5%, respectively, compared with those of the non- mycorrhizal seedlings. AMF inoculation significantly enhanced the growth parameter of E. angustifolia seedlings in the presence of 300 mmol/L NaCl.

2.3. Effects of RI and CK on the Soluble Sugar Content, Soluble Protein Content in the Leaves of E. angustifolia under Salt Stress

As shown in Figure 2A, salinity stress caused a significant decline in the leaf soluble protein content of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings, while mycorrhizal seedlings had a higher leaf soluble protein content than non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress treatments. As shown in Figure 2B, AMF inoculation significantly promoted the leaf soluble sugar content in the treatments lacking salt. The soluble sugar content in the leaves of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal seedlings increased, but mycorrhizal seedlings had a higher leaf soluble sugar content than that of the non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress.

2.4. Effect of RI on Protein Abundance under Salt Stress

In the CK, AM-NaCl, AM, and AM-NaCl groups, a total of 25,082 peptides and 4349 proteins were identified in the E. angustifolia seedlings. The number of proteins identified in the three replicates of each treatment group is shown in Figure 3. Quantifiable proteins were identified in at least two of the three replicates for further analysis. The significance of the differential proteins’ abundances was filtered by the ratio > ±2 and p value < 0.05. The numbers of the differentially abundant proteins between treatments (NaCl vs CK, AM vs CK, AM + NaCl vs AM, and AM + NaCl vs NaCl) are shown in Table 2.

2.5. Functional Classification of Proteins

2.5.1. Salt Tolerance-Related Proteins Induced by Symbiosis

As shown in Table 2, a total of 187 differentially expressed proteins were identified in the AM vs the CK group. The 186 proteins were compared with the AM + NaCl vs the AM group; a total of 112 were found in the AM + NaCl vs the AM group. Among the 112 proteins, four proteins were highly abundant, 25 were newly expressed proteins under salt stress, and 14 proteins were identified as symbiotic salt tolerance related proteins after referring to many academic documents, as shown in Table A1. These 14 proteins are beneficial to the maintenance of AMF-E. angustifolia symbiosis and improved the salt tolerance of the plant under salt stress.

2.5.2. Functional Classification of Salt Tolerance-Related Proteins Induced by Symbiosis

Blast2GO (Version 3.3.5) was used to annotate the biological functions of the targeted proteins. These proteins were divided into seven groups (Figure 4), including metabolism, signal transduction, redox, transport, cytoskeleton, protein synthesis, protein folding, and degradation (Table A1). Among them, the proportion of metabolic and protein folding related proteins were the largest, which was 22%. The second category was related to redox, transport, and cytoskeleton, which was 14%. The third category included signal transduction-related and protein synthesis proteins.

2.5.3. Salt-Induced Mycorrhizal Protein

As shown in Figure 5, after a comparison of differentially expressed proteins between NaCl vs CK and AM + NaCl vs AM groups by VENNY 2.1 (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html), 121 out of 392 proteins in the AM + NaCl vs AM group were identical with those in the NaCl vs CK group. It is suggested that these 121 proteins are salt-tolerant related proteins of E. angustifolia under salt stress, and are not caused by mycorrhizal. However, 271 proteins not in the NaCl vs CK group were considered to be salt-induced mycorrhizal proteins. The mycorrhizal proteins produced by AMF-E. angustifolia symbiosis to adapt to salt stress under salt stimulation. Thus, the salt tolerance of plants can be improved.

2.5.4. Functional Classification of Salt-Induced Mycorrhizal Protein

A total of 57 out of 271 proteins were previously reported to be key proteins for the salt response, as shown in Table A2. These were divided into 10 groups by Blast 2 GO analysis (Figure 6). In these functional groups, the first class (23%) are proteins related to metabolism. There are nine (accounting for 14%) different expressed proteins in the signal transduction pathway, which is the second class. Meanwhile, the other 10 functional groups are also involved in protein redox, protein synthesis, photosynthesis, energy, transport, the cytoskeleton, and stress response related proteins.

3. Discussion

AMF and salt affected the obvious physical appearance of E. angustifolia leaf, and both have a clear interaction. For this reason, we think that AMF has a great influence on salt habitats and that, moreover, salt stress is also a factor in this influence. On the one hand, compared with the AM vs CK group and the AM + NaCl vs AM group, the salt-tolerant proteins caused by the symbiosis could be identified; on the other hand, by comparing the differentially abundant proteins of the NaCl vs CK group and the AM + NaCl vs AM group, the protein for the symbiosis response caused by salt treatment could be identified. Therefore, these two ways were selected to discuss how symbiosis responds to salt stress at the protein level (Figure 7).

3.1. Proteins Related to Metabolism

Metabolism, consisting of basic physiological processes, maintains a series of activities of a living organism. This research shows the most important factor in the leaves of the E. angustifolia after salt stress was the abundance of secondary metabolism-related proteins. In secondary metabolism, especially the metabolism of the protein, phenylpropane and flavonoids increased significantly under salt stress.
Studies have shown that secondary metabolites of plants change during the symbiosis of mycorrhizal fungi and plants [16]. These secondary metabolites play an important role in the symbiotic relationship between plants and mycorrhizal fungi [17]. For example, the content of lignin and soluble phenol in the tomato was increased by inoculation with Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Flavonoids can promote spore germination and mycelium growth and increase the content of flavonoids after mycorrhizal formation [18,19]. In this study, there were two pathways involved in metabolism-related proteins, as shown in Figure 8.
  • In this study, we found a chorismate mutase (CM), which catalyzes the conversion of branched acid to prebenzoic acid. Prebenzoic acid can produce phenolic compounds through the phenylpropane metabolic pathway, including phenylalanine (Phe), tyrosine (Tyr), anthocyanin, and tannin [20,21]. Phenylpropane metabolism is indirectly generated by the shikimic acid pathway. This pathway might play an important role in plant stress defense. We found three proteins that relate to the phenylalanine metabolic pathways, including shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase. Flavonoids are synthesized by the condensation of phenylpropane derivatives with malonate monoacyl coenzyme A. In addition, shikimic acid O-hydroxyacinnamate transferase and caffeoyl coenzyme A-O-methyltransferase were also involved.
  • In this study, we found that the phosphoribosyltransferase (APT) was up-regulated, which was the first key enzyme in the tryptophan production reaction of o-aminobenzoic acid. Phosphorylribosyltransferase activity of o-aminobenzoic acid was enhanced, which accelerated the synthesis of tryptophan in plants under salt stress. It is well known that tryptophan is a precursor of auxin (indole acetic acid) as well as protein synthesis in plants. Auxin response was also identified in the leaves of E. angustifolia. We deduced that these two pathways synthesize auxin to maintain the growth and metabolism of mycorrhizal plants under salt stress.
Alkaline neutral invertase is involved in the decomposition of sucrose into glucose and fructose and plays an important role in plant growth and development. The study showed that NaCl and PEG (Polyethylene glycol) stress increased the differential expression of sugar cane SoNIN1 in the root and leaf [22], and the alkaline neutral transformation enzyme was involved in the stress response. This study found that after inoculation of AMF to the E. angustifolia leaf in the treatment of salt stress, alkaline neutral invertase increased its expression, thereby improving the soluble sugar content of the E. angustifolia leaf, and providing more sugar for plant metabolism.

3.2. Protein Synthesis, Folding, and Degradation Related Proteins

Protein synthesis plays an important role in plant growth under abiotic stress. We found two proteins (ubiquitin-60S ribosomal L4 and 60S acidic ribosomal P1) were up-regulated in the mycorrhizal plant. Similar ribosomal proteins were also found in studies [23]. One study showed that mitochondrial elongation factors can extend peptide chains more [24], and this was also found to be up-regulated in this study. These proteins related to protein synthesis increase the tolerance of the mycorrhizal plant to salt stress by increasing the expression level.
Proteins can lose their biological functions due to denaturation under adverse conditions. Correct folding and degradation of proteins are key to the maintenance of normal cell functions. Molecular chaperones and folding enzymes play an important role in the maintenance of the natural conformation of proteins, which can help them fold correctly [23,25]. In this study, we found that four folding enzymes, peptide-based prolyl cis-trans isomerases, and four molecular chaperones were up-regulated under salt stress, including peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP12, FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5 isoform 1, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CYP18-1, peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP62, prefoldin subunit 1, prefoldin subunit 2, heat shock 70 kDa partial, and small heat shock protein 17.3 kDa. Therefore, the up-regulation of these four peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases and four molecular chaperones completes the correct folding of proteins and helps the mycorrhizal E. angustifolia resist salt stress.
E3 ubiquitin ligase (UPL3) and ubiquitin-like 1-activating enzyme (E1 B) increased their expression under salt stress. Studies have shown that E3 ubiquitin protein ligase, ubiquitin activation enzyme E1, and ubiquitin ligase all catalyze ubiquitin to their target proteins. Moreover, the specificity of the ubiquitin pathway is controlled by E3, which is pertinent because it can provide the greatest response to environmental stress by regulating the transcription factor of the downstream stress response [26].

3.3. Signal Transduction-Related Proteins

Plants exposed to an adverse environment for a long time will produce a complex system of signal sensing and transduction. It is particularly important to understand how mycorrhizal plants perceive and transmit this stress signal, as well as method of improving the plant salt tolerance under salt stress.
In this study, a series of proteins related to signal transduction were screened out, including G protein, phospholipase C, plasma membrane Ca2+ transporter ATPase (PMCA), calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPKs), calmodulin (CaM), and calcium binding (CML), and were up-regulated. They communicated with each other, thus completing the process of perceiving and transmitting stress signals.
G protein, also known as signal-converting protein or coupling protein, can specifically bind and recognize signals on the cell membrane, and produce intracellular signals with the medial membrane effector enzyme (phospholipase C), which plays a role in signal transduction. After transmembrane conversion, extracellular signals are further transmitted and expanded through Ca2+ (second messenger) signals, which eventually lead to a series of physiological and biochemical reactions in cells. Ca2+ participates in metabolic pathways that are mainly dependent on changes in the Ca2+ concentration [27], and this process is achieved by the various calcium transport systems distributed in the cell organelles and cell membranes [28]. The changes in the Ca2+ concentration in the various processes in this study depended on the plasma membrane Ca2+ transporter, ATPase (PMCA), which is the main Ca2+ transporter, transporting Ca2+ to the extracellular space at the cost of hydrolyzing an ATP molecule. Studies have shown that the calcium-dependent protein kinase (CDPKs), calmodulin, calmodulin, and the calcium phosphatase B protein, are involved in cell signal transduction and responses to specific stimuli [29,30]. In this study, the Ca2+ concentrations maintained a steady state in the cell wall, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, and vacuole, while the concentration in the cytoplasm was low. After salt stimulation, the Ca2+ concentration in the cytoplasm increased significantly. On the one hand, Ca2+ directly binds to the calmodulin or the calmodulin, transfers the received signal to the protein kinase and stimulates its activity, or the activity of calcium depends on the protein kinases (CDPKs), which are directly stimulated by the Ca2+ signal, and directly participate in and cause subsequent physiological responses through these two processes. These two processes directly participate in and cause subsequent physiological responses.

3.4. ROS Scavenging-Related Proteins

Active oxygen species (ROS) are usually accumulated in plants under salt stress [31], which can be used as signal molecules to activate the plant stress defense system [32]. However, all ROS are very harmful to organisms at high concentrations, leading to cell membrane peroxidation, destruction of enzyme activity, and eventually leading to cell inactivation. Therefore, the removal of ROS can resist salt damage and improve the salt tolerance of plants. In this study, thioredoxin (TRX) and glutathione (GRX) were involved in ROS scavenging as redox enzymes. In these plants, based on the TRX redox system that runs in various kinds of organelles, including the cytoplasm, mitochondria, and chloroplasts [33,34,35,36], it was shown that TRX plays a key role in plant redox regulation. At present, many GRXs have been identified in different plants. For example, over-expression of the tomato SLGRX1 gene can enhance the plant’s resistance to oxidative stress, drought resistance, and salt pollution in Arabidopsis. In contrast, silencing this gene leads to an increased insensitivity to stress in the tomato [37]. Meanwhile, the gene silencing increases the membrane lipid peroxide level and the accumulation of ROS and suppresses the activity of antioxidant enzymes under high-temperature stress. This suggests that GRXs are involved in the regulation of the redox status and the response to high-temperature stress.
In our study, three glutathione s-transferase (GST) and two glutathione peroxidase (GPX) were found. Studies have reported that to prevent ROS damage, the amount of glutathione transferase (GST) in plants will increase, which can catalyze the removal of ROS in plants [38]. Glutathione peroxidase (GPX) is a sulfur-containing peroxidase, which can remove hydrogen peroxide, organic hydroperoxides, and lipid peroxides from the organism, and block further damage of ROS to the organism [39,40]. It has been shown that chloroplast glutathione transferase plays a very important role in the resistance of low concentrations in Stargrass seedlings [41]. When plants are exposed to high salt stress, the expression activity of GPX will be enhanced and the tolerance of plants to salt stress will be enhanced [42,43,44]. In addition, excessive expression of GST/GPX in transgenic tobacco under salt stress conditions for seed germination and seedling growth were improved more than for the control group, suggesting that GST/GPX increases the ROS removal in plants, protects plants from oxidative damage, and maintains the growth of plants [45,46]. These results suggest that the GST/GPX system is a key factor in the improvement of the salt tolerance of plants through its ROS scavenging ability under salt stress. Peroxidase (POD) is one of the key enzymes in plants under stress conditions in the enzymatic defense system. It cooperates with superoxide dismutase and catalase to remove excess ROS to improve plant resistance.
“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Modulates Antioxidant Response and Ion Distribution in Salt-Stressed Elaeagnus angustifolia Seedlings”- Changes of SOD, CAT, POD, and APX activities in the leaves of E. angustifolia inoculated with AMF and those of non-inoculated E. angustifolia under 0 and 300 salt concentrations were analyzed [47].
As shown in Figure 9, mycorrhizal seedlings had a higher leaf SOD (superoxide dismutase), CAT (Catalase), POD (Peroxidase), and APX (ascorbate peroxidase) activity than that of the non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress. The mycorrhization of the plants led to increased levels of leaf antioxidant defense systems during stress conditions. The results obtained at the protein level are consistent with the results of the apparent physiological indicators in this study. Therefore, we can conclude that TRX/GRX, GST/GPX, and POD are up-regulated in mycorrhizal plants under salt stress, which results in a significant increase of SOD, CAT, POD, and APX activities in plant leaves, thus improving the salt tolerance of mycorrhizal plants.

3.5. Energy-Related Protein

Mitochondria are the main site of oxidative phosphorylation and the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) in cells, and they provide energy for cell activity. NADH dehydrogenase, cytochrome C oxidase, iron sulfur protein NADH dehydrogenase, and ATP synthase up-regulation were found in this study as complex compounds I, IV, and V participated in the mitochondrial electron transport. The mitochondrial electron transport chain is also called the respiratory chain, and the cells transfer electrons obtained from the oxidation of macromolecules via I, II, III, and IV complexes and the energy produced by the electron transfer maintains the proton gradient of the mitochondrial inner membrane, which is utilized by complex V (ATP synthase) to catalyze the formation of ATP. In this study, proteins involved in providing cellular energy were up-regulated to provide energy for mycorrhizal plants to resist salt stress.

3.6. Photosynthesis-Related Proteins

AMF and plant symbiosis can promote plant growth by increasing the photosynthesis of plants under salt stress, thereby increasing the ability of plants to resist the salt stress [48,49,50,51,52,53]. In this study, a photosystem II D1 precursor processing PSB27 was found to have upregulated expression. Photosystem II D1 protein is the core protein of photosystem II, which is synthesized in light and is injured by light or other adverse factors. Repairing D1 protein damage repairs PS II, maintaining its dynamic balance through continuous turnover [54,55]. In addition, the reactive center proteins, D1 and D2, are the binding sites of the auxiliary factors for all redox activities, which are necessary for PSII electron transport [54,56]. Thus, the photosystem II D1 protein plays an important role in the maintenance of the stability of the PSII reaction center. The previously mentioned thioredoxin (TRX), which is electronically reduced by the ferredoxin/thioredoxin system (Fd/TRX) in the chloroplasts of plants, is involved in the electron transport of plant photosynthesis. Guo [57] and other studies found that GRXs gene-silenced plants resulted in a significant decrease in ETR of photosystem II, and a significant increase in NPQ in varying degrees. Meanwhile, GRXs gene silencing results in a significant decrease in the maximum quantum efficiency (Fv/Fm) and the actual electronic yield (Ф PSII) under high temperature stress. This is consistent with the results of the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in the early stage of this experiment [58], in which Fv/Fm, PSII, NPQ, and ETR in the leaves of E. angustifolia inoculated with AMF were higher than those of non-mycorrhizal plants under salt stress. In this study, TRX and GRX were up-regulated at the protein level, and Fv/Fm, PSII, NPQ, and ETR of mycorrhizal plants were significantly increased at the apparent level, thus alleviating the damage of salt stress to plants.

3.7. Network Interaction Predictions Based on Differential Expression

The protein–protein interaction information of the studied proteins was retrieved from the IntAct molecular interaction database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/) by their gene symbols or STRING software (http://string-db.org/). These interactions included the direct physical proteins and the indirect proteins correlated with indirect functions as shown in Figure 10. The results showed that ubiquitin-60S ribosomal was the most correlated protein, directly or indirectly, with connections to proteins, such as 60S acidic ribosomal, elongation factor mitochondrial, ubiquitin-activating enzyme E1, and E3 ubiquitin-ligase. Additionally, most of the target proteins were associated with ubiquitin-60S ribosomal and were in the protein synthesis, folding, and degradation pathway. Thus, this pathway might play an important role in stress tolerance. Ubiquitin-60S ribosomal interacts with various peroxidases, thereby participating in E. angustifolia protein synthesis, folding, and degradation biosynthetic processes, and modulates stress responses. These findings showed that the salt stress response is a multi-factor process involving many protein interactions.
The hypothesized mechanism of the improved salt tolerance of the mycorrhizal plant was revealed from the proteome.
In the current study, based on proteomic data analysis, it is suggested that AMF can improve the salt tolerance of E. angustifolia seedlings (Figure 11).
  • AMF accelerates the secondary metabolism of plants, mainly phenylpropanoid metabolism (shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase, cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase, and caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase), reducing salt damage to plants.
  • AMF enhances the signal transduction of the second messenger Ca2+ (G protein, phospholipase C, plasma membrane Ca2+ transporter ATPase (PMCA), calcium binding (CML), calcium-dependent kinases (CDPKs), and calmodulin (CaM), increasing the speed of sensing and transmitting of stress signals, allowing plants to follow up.
  • Among a variety of antioxidant pathways (TRX/GRX, GST/GPX, POD), AMF enhances the antioxidant capacity of plants by increasing ROS clearance.
  • AMF promotes protein biosynthesis, speeding up protein folding, and inhibiting protein degradation (ubiquitin-60S ribosomal, 60S acidic ribosomal, elongation factor mitochondrial, ubiquitin activating enzyme E1, and E3 ubiquitin- ligase).
  • In the chloroplast, AMF maintains the PSII reaction centre conformation stability and speeds up photosynthetic electron transport (TRX/GRX, photosystem II D1 precursor processing PSB27- chloroplastic); in mitochondria, AMF enhances the synthesis of ATP (NADH dehydrogenase, cytochrome C oxidase, iron sulfur protein NADH dehydrogenase, and ATP synthase), providing sufficient energy for cellular activities.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Materials and Salinity Treatments

E. angustifolia seeds were provided by Heilongjiang Jinxiudadi Biological Engineering Co. Ltd. (Haerbin, China). AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis (RI) was propagated and preserved by Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Ecological Restoration. The mycorrhizal inoculum containing approximately 25–30 AM propagules/g consisted of soil, spores, mycelia, and infected root fragments. The soil was collected from the Forest Botanical Garden of Heilongjiang Province, sieved (5 mm), and mixed with vermiculite (3:1, soil:vermiculite, v/v). The soil medium was pre-autoclaved at 121 °C for 2 h.
There were four different treatments as follows: E. angustifolia inoculated Rhizophagus irregularis without salt stress, E. angustifolia inoculated Rhizophagus irregularis under salt stress (300 mmol/L NaCl), E. angustifolia non-inoculated Rhizophagus irregularis without salt stress, and E. angustifolia non-inoculated Rhizophagus irregularis under salt stress (300 mmol/L NaCl). Each treatment had six replicates. The inoculated dosage of mycorrhizal inoculum per pot was 10 g. The same amount of inactive mycorrhizal inoculum (121 °C, 2 h) was used in non-inoculated treatments. The 300 mmol/L NaCl was added into the pots after 4 months of being inoculated with mycorrhizal inoculum as described [47]. Seedlings continued to be cultivated for 30 days. The experiment was carried out under outdoor natural conditions.
Three seedlings were randomly selected from each pot and 6–7 round leaves were removed from each seedling. Leaves from two pots of the same treatment were combined as one sample. There were three biological repeats per treatment. The proteomic, AMF colonization, and growth parameter of the samples was detected.

4.2. Measurement of AMF Colonization and Growth Parameter

The AMF colonization rate of E. angustifolia was determined by the acid fuchsin staining method [59]. The height and diameter of E. angustifolia were measured by a vernier caliper. The root area and root length of E. angustifolia were measured by a root scanner.

4.3. Measurement of Soluble Sugar Content, Soluble Protein Content in the Leaves of E. angustifolia under Salt Stress

To assess the degree of stress, the contents of sugar and soluble protein were detected using the anthrone colorimetric method and coomassie brilliant blue G-250 method [60,61]. Samples were taken during the same growth period and from the same leaf positions.

4.4. Extraction and Quantification of Proteins

The leaves of all samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground with a pestle and mortar. TCA/acetone (1:9) was added to the powder (1:5, v/v) and mixed by vortex. The mixture was placed at –20 °C for 4 h, and centrifuged at 6000× g for 40 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was discarded. The pre-cooling acetone was added into the pellet and washed three times. The precipitation was air dried. SDT buffer (1:30, v/v) was added to 20–30 mg of powder, mixed, and boiled for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered with 0.22 µm filters. The filtrate was quantified with the BCA Protein Assay Kit (P0012, Beyotime, Shanghai, China).

4.5. FASP Digestion

Proteins of each sample (200 μg) were mixed with 200 μL UA buffer, and the mixture was filtered by a ultrafiltration centrifugal tube (10 kD) at 14,000× g for 15 min, and the pellet was re-suspended and filtered. The 100 μL iodoacetamide (100 mM IAA in UA buffer) was added into each sample and incubated for 30 min in darkness. The filters were washed with 100 μL UA buffer three times and subsequently with 100 μL 25 mM NH4HCO3 buffer twice. The protein suspensions were digested with 4 μg trypsin in 40 μL 25 mM NH4HCO3 buffer overnight at 37 °C. The collection of the resulting peptides with a new collector and peptides were desalted on C18 Cartridges, freeze-dried, and reconstituted in 40 µL of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. The peptide content was estimated by UV light spectral density at 280 nm.

4.6. LC-MS/MS Analysis

Proteins were separated by using an Easy nLC HPLC liquid phase system with an increasing flow rate. The chromatographic column was balanced by 95% A solution (0.1% formic acid aqueous solution). The sample was injected onto the C18 column (Thermo Scientific Acclaim PepMap100, 100 μm × 2 cm, nanoViper C18) by an automatic sample injector and separated by C18-a2 analytical column (Thermo scientific EASY column, 10 cm, ID75 μm, 3 μm, C18-A) at a flow rate of 300 mL/min. Solution B (0.1% formic acid acetonitrile aqueous solution) was then used for gradient elution.
The samples separated by chromatography were analyzed with a Q-Exactive mass spectrometer. The analysis time was 120 min, the detection method was the positive-ion mode, the parent-ion scanning range was 300–1800 m/z, the resolution of a first-order mass spectrometer was 70,000 at 200 m/z, the AGC target was 3e6, the first level maximum IT was 10 ms, the number of scan ranges was 1, and the dynamic exclusion was 40.0 s.

4.7. Database Search and Protein Quantification

The database used was P16440_Unigene.fasta.transdecoder_73797_20161212.fasta (Sequence 73797, self-building). Maxquant software 1.3.0.5 [62] was used to analyze the protein qualitatively and quantitatively in the original raw file. The maxquant software parameter table is shown in Table 3.
For the proteins identified by mass spectrometry in the original data, differentially expressed proteins and differentially expressed proteins were screened by the screening criteria of Ratio > +/−2 and p value < 0.05. The quantified protein sequence information was extracted in batches from the UniProtKB database (version number: 201701).

4.8. Protein GO Functional Annotation and KEGG Pathway Annotation

Blast 2 GO was used to annotate the functions of the targeted proteins [63]. KASS software was used for pathway analysis. The target protein sequences were classified by KO compared to the KEGG GENES database, and then the pathway information involved in the target protein sequence was automatically acquired according to the KO classification.

4.9. Protein—Protein Interact Network (PPI)

The protein—protein interaction information of the studied proteins was retrieved from the IntAct molecular interaction database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/intact/) by their gene symbols or STRING software (http://string-db.org/). The results were downloaded in the XGMML format and imported into Cytoscape5 software (http://www.cytoscape.org/, version 3.2.1) to visualize and further analyze the functional protein-protein interaction networks. Furthermore, the degree of each protein was calculated to evaluate the importance of the protein in the PPI network.

5. Conclusions

E. angustifolia seedlings’ growth was significantly inhibited by salt stress, and growth was improved in mycorrhizal symbionts. Furthermore, mycorrhizal E. angustifolia had a higher leaf soluble sugar and soluble protein content than that of the non-mycorrhizal seedlings during salt stress. Additionally, it was found that AMF inoculated E. angustifolia seedlings increased secondary metabolism, enhanced Ca2+ signal transduction and ROS scavenging capacity, promoted protein biosynthesis, accelerated protein folding, and inhibited protein degradation compared with non-inoculated plants under salt stress. In addition, AMF maintained the conformation stability of the PS II reaction center, accelerated the photosynthetic electron transfer, enhanced ATP synthesis, and provided sufficient energy for cell activity. Overall, these findings show that AMF played an important role in easing salt stress in plants and contributed to saline alkali soil remediation.

Author Contributions

T.J. and J.W. contributed equally for this article. T.J. and J.W. did the experiment and analyzed data and wrote this paper. W.C. participated to analyze the data. X.F. and X.S. participated to do this experiment. F.S. designed this experiment. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 31570635), the Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Welfare, (No. 201504409), Heilongjiang Natural Fund Team Project: Study on Microbial Control Technology of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution in Cold Region, 100 Discipline Young Scholars Project of the Heilongjiang University.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shanghai Applied Protein Technology Co. Ltd. for the help with Label-free sequencing. This work was supported by Key Laboratory of Microbiology, College of Heilongjiang Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. The identification and quantitative analysis of the protein in leaves of E. angustifolia with AMF under salt stress (salt-tolerance-related proteins induced by symbiosis).
Table A1. The identification and quantitative analysis of the protein in leaves of E. angustifolia with AMF under salt stress (salt-tolerance-related proteins induced by symbiosis).
TR NumberProtein NameUnique PeptidesSequence Coverage [%]Mol. Weight [kDa]AM/CKAM+NaCl/AMFold Changet Test p Value
Metabolic process
115007Auxin response 425.752.521underover
142773purple acid phosphatase 2-like [64,65]211.253.569underover
71893probable alkaline neutral invertase B [22]2465.249underover
Protein folding and degradation
101573AAA-ATPase At5g17760-like [66]2858.706underover
12335Heat shock 70 kDa partial [67]155.322.844underover
143526small heat shock protein 17.3 kDa21.181.397overover2.320.032
Protein synthesis
109446ubiquitin-60S ribosomal L40 [23]141.414.643underover
Redox
127397thioredoxin 1 [68,69]110.520.973underover
130845glutaredoxin 3 [37]22413.046underover
Cytoskeleton
114464actin-related 7 [70]14.739.154underover
Transport
119356transmembrane 147 [71]210.525.299underover
88151vesicle transport v-SNARE 13 [72]215.824.96underover
Signalling
136541serine/threonine-protein kinase PRP4 [73,74]15.128.709underover
Table
Table A2. The identification and quantitative analysis of the protein in leaves of E. angustifolia with AMF under salt stress (salt-induced mycorrhizal protein).
Table A2. The identification and quantitative analysis of the protein in leaves of E. angustifolia with AMF under salt stress (salt-induced mycorrhizal protein).
TR NumberProtein NameUnique PeptidesSequence Coverage [%]Mol. Weight [kDa]AM+NaCl/AMFold Changet Test p Value
Metabolic process
103310beta-glucosidase 40 [75]37.760.254over
142616beta-glucosidase 42 [75]718.857.009over2.160.037
1058491,2-dihydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentene dioxygenase [76]632.223.919over2.420.014
121954anthocyanidin reductase [77]25.237.122over
123153shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase-like25.547.978over
124556acetyl-CoA carboxylase [78]54.8155.54over
47457chorismate mutase chloroplastic-like [20,21]18.714.428over
66089probable cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 1 [20,21]931.538.574over2.220.006
99076caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase [20,21]11.572.473over
73516phosphoglucan phosphatase chloroplastic isoform X11262.123over
98093delta-1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase mitochondrial-like [2]935.537.633over2.070.001
99156anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase [20,21]23.383.928over2.060.016
120341UDP-glucose 4-epimerase [79]1549.743.428over2.680.007
Signalling
87721phospholipase C61459.562over
114971calcium-dependent kinase 29 [30]1651.414over
142143calcium-transporting ATPase plasma membrane-type [28]111.415.308over
155255glycine-rich 2-like [80]232.811.363over2.170.018
19556calcium-transporting ATPase plasma membrane-type [28]18.818.439over
67342probable calcium-binding CML20 [29]315.822.997over
61926calmodulin-7 [30]746.721.009over2.70.046
24540guanylate-binding family17.813.089over
Protein folding and degradation
110214E3 ubiquitin- ligase UPL3 [26]22.3196.04over
122927peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP12 [23,25]221.412.076over
74495FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5 isoform 1 [23,25]18.933.514over
61488prefoldin subunit 2 [23,25]331.116.223over
72620prefoldin subunit 1 [23,25]326.414.922over
91034peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CYP18-1 [23,25]18.817.474over
93048peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP62-like [23,25]120.813.805over
73875ubiquitin-like 1-activating enzyme E1 B [26]611.474.427over2.640.000
Protein synthesis
9275560S acidic ribosomal P1236.914.968over2.730.013
33127exportin-2 [81]114.111.097over
106351nuclear pore complex NUP98A [82,83]13.850.09over
109126elongation factor mitochondrial [24]25.444.427over
Redox
101431monothiol glutaredoxin-mitochondrial315.619.243over2.270.010
12964peroxidase 16-like17.613.952over
29124probable linoleate 9S-lipoxygenase 5219.317.097over3.060.036
59386glutathione S-transferase L3-like [39,40]1142.629.735over2.650.003
79685probable glutathione peroxidase 2 [45,46]633.221.733over2.350.017
975662,4-D inducible glutathione S-transferase [39,40]422.725.559over
87674glutathione S-transferase T1 [39,40]316.827.036over
88089probable glutathione peroxidase 8 [45,46]31719.394over2.430.006
Energy
109215ATP synthase subunit mitochondrial460.614.69over3.360.015
141440NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 7540.615.264over2.590.010
28754NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 717.911.862over
78587NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur mitochondrial29.418.933over2.190.029
104876cytochrome c oxidase subunit mitochondrial-like230.311.185over2.270.050
Transport
88283aquaporin PIP2-1-like [84]14.930.753over
7488aquaporin PIP1-4 [84]211.921.091over
87290mechanosensitive ion channel 1 [85]22.585.926over
88244vacuolar sorting-associated 2 homolog 1 [86]26.725.106over
Stress
109624GDSL esterase lipase 1 [87]313.242.914over
93161GDSL esterase lipase At3g27950-like [88]28.930.265over2.070.029
58645stress response NST1-like12.835.36over
Photosynthesis
71168photosystem II D1 precursor processing PSB27-chloroplastic-like [54,55,56]212.323.507over
8490hexokinase-3 isoform X1 [89]114.916.704over2.50.002
Cytoskeleton
73217profilin213.119.413over2.450.039
121711actin-depolymerizing factor 1 [90]226.616.042over

References

  1. Sun, Y.F.; Song, F.Q.; Chang, W.; Fan, X.X. The effects of the AMF on the growth and physiology of the E. angustifolia seedlings under the stress of saline. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2016, 52, 18–27. [Google Scholar]
  2. Porcel, R.; Aroca, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Salinity stress alleviation using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 32, 181–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kapoor, R.; Evelin, H.; Mathur, P.; Giri, B. Plant Acclimation to Environmental Stress; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 359–401. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, X.L.; Feng, G. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Ecological Physiology; Sino-Culture Press: Beijing, China, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo, X.Z.; Bi, G.C. Mycorrhiza and Its Application Technology; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  6. Li, G.Z.; Chen, Z.C.; Li, X.C.; Sheng, J.D.; Huang, C.F.; Jin, J.X. Spatial distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the roots of Phragmites australis in Xinjiang. Pr. Sci. 2016, 33, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ruiz-Lozano, J.M.; Porcel, R.; Azcon, C.; Aroca, R. Regulationby arbuscular mycorrhizae of the integrated physiological responseto salinity in plants: New challenges in physiological andmolecular studies. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar, A.; Sharma, S.; Mishra, S. Influence ofarbuscularmycorrhizal (AM) fungi and salinity on seedling growth, soluteaccumulation, and mycorrhizal dependency of Jatrophacurcas L. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 29, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, M.N.; Zhang, K.; Long, G.; Sun, Y.; Kang, J.M.; Zhang, T.J.; Cao, S.H. iTRAQ-based comparative proteomic analysis reveals tissue-specific and novel early-stage molecular mechanisms of salt stress response in Carex rigescens. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2017, 143, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ma, Q.L.; Kang, J.M.; Long, R.C.; Cui, Y.G.; Zhang, T.J.; Xiong, J.B.; Yang, Q.C.; Sun, Y. Proteomic analysis of salt and osmotic-drought stress in alfalfaseedlings. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 2266–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, J.J.; Chen, S.X.; Dai, S.J. Physiological and proteomic analysis of salinity tolerance in Puccinellia tenuiflora. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3852–3870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Banaei-Asl, F.; Farajzadeh, D.; Bandehagh, A.; Komatsu, S. Comprehensive proteomic analysis of canola leaf inoculated with a plant growth-promoting bacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, under salt stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2016, 1864, 1222–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yin, Y.Q.; Yang, R.Q.; Han, Y.B.; Gu, Z.X. Comparative proteomic and physiological analysesreveal the protective effect of exogenous calcium on the germinating soybean response to salt stress. J. Proteom. 2015, 113, 110–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Niu, X.P.; Xu, J.T.; Chen, T.; Tao, A.; Qi, J.M. Proteomic changes in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) leaves under saltstress. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 91, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lv, D.W.; Zhu, G.R.; Zhu, D.; Bian, Y.W.; Liang, X.N.; Cheng, Z.W.; Deng, X.; Yan, Y.M. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis reveals the response and defense mechanism in leaves of diploid wheat T. monococcum under salts tress and recovery. J. Proteom. 2016, 143, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Morandi, D. Occurrence of Phytoalexins and Phenolic com Pounds in endomyeorrhizalinteractions, and their Potential role in biological control. Plant Soil 1996, 185, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Akiyama, K.; Matsuoka, H.; Hayashi, H. Isolation and identification of a phosphate deficieney-induced C-glycosylflavonoid that stimulates arbuscular mycorrhiza formation in melon roots. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2002, 15, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhao, X.; Yan, X.F. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant secondary metabolism. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2006, 30, 514–521. [Google Scholar]
  19. Larose, G.; Chnevert, R.; Moutoglis, P.; Gagne, S.; Piche, Y.; Vietheilig, H. Flavonoid Ievels in roots of Medicagosativa are modulated by the developmental stage of the symbiosis and the root colonizing arbuseular mycorrhizal fungus. J. Plant Physiol. 2002, 159, 1329–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qian, X.; Yu, K.J.; Yuan, G.S.; Yang, H.Y.; Pan, Q.H.; Zhu, B.Q. Research progress in plant anthranilate synthase. J. Trop. Biol. 2015, 6, 504–511. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pérez, E.; Rubio, M.B.; Cardoza, R.E.; Gutiérrez, S.; Bettiol, W.; Monte, E.; Hermosa, R. The importance of chorismate mutase in the biocontrol potential of Trichoderma parareesei. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Niu, J.Q.; Wang, A.Q.; Huang, J.L.; Yang, L.T.; Li, Y.R. Cloning and expression analysis of sugarcane alkaline/neutral invertase gene SoNIN1. Acta Agron. Sin. 2014, 40, 253–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, H.Y.; Yu, P.; Zhang, Y.X.; Wu, C.; Ma, C.Q.; Yu, B.; Zhu, N.; Koh, J.; Chen, S.X. Salt stress response of membrane proteome of sugarbeet monosomic addition line M14. J. Proteom. 2015, 127, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Suzuki, H.; Ueda, T.; Taguchi, H.; Takeuchi, N. Chaperoneproperties of mammalian mitochondrial translation elongationfactor Tu. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 4076–4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Yu, J.J.; Chen, S.X.; Dai, S.J. Comparative proteomic analysis of Puccinellia tenuiflora leaves under Na2CO3 stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 1740–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lyzenga, W.J.; Stone, S.L. Abiotic stress tolerance mediated by protein ubiquitination. J. Exp. Botary 2012, 63, 599–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, S.S.; Lan, H.Y. Signal Transduction Pathways in Response to Salt Stress in Plants. Plant Physiol. J. 2011, 47, 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kim, J.S.; Park, S.J.; Kwak, K.J.; Kim, Y.O.; Kim, J.K.; Song, J.; Jang, B.; Jung, S.H.; Kang, H. Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote the cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Harmon, A.C. Calcium-regulated protein kinases of plants. Gravit. Space Biol. Bull. 2003, 16, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Asano, T.; Hayashi, N.; Kikuchi, S.; Ohsugi, R. CDPK-mediated abiotic stress signaling. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 817–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Choudhury, S.; Panda, P.; Sahoo, L.; Panda, S.K. Reactive oxygen species signalingin plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8, e23681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.X.; Pan, D.Z.; Li, J.; Tan, F.L.; Benning, S.H.; Liang, W.Y.; Chen, W. Proteomic analysis of changes in the Kandelia candel chloroplast proteins reveals pathways associated with salt tolerance. Plant Sci. 2015, 231, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rouhier, N.; Gelhaye, E.; Jacquot, J.P. Redox control by dithiol–disulfide exchange in plants: II. The cytosolic and mitochondrial systems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 973, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Scheibe, R.; Dietz, K.J. Reduction-oxidation network for flexible adjustment ofcellular metabolism in photoautotrophic cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Jacquot, J.P.; Rouhier, N.; Gelhaye, E. Redox control by dithiol–disulfide exchange in plants: I. The chloroplastic systems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 973, 508–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Michelet, L.; Zaffagnini, M.; Morisse, S.; Sparla, F.; Pérez-Pérez, M.E.; Francia, F.; Danon, A.; Marchand, C.H.; Fermani, S.; Trost, P.; et al. Redox regulation of the Calvin–Benson cycle: Something old, something new. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Guo, Y.; Huang, C.; Xie, Y.; Song, F.; Zhou, X. A tomato glutaredoxin gene SLGRX1 regulates plant responses to oxidative, drought and salt stresses. Planta 2010, 232, 1499–1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Song, C.Q.; Miao, H.F.; Zhu, B. The role of plant glutathione-S-transferase in phytoremediation. Anhui Agric. Bull. 2010, 16, 1007–7731. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Margis, R.; Dunand, C.; Teixeira, F.K.; Pinheiro, M.M. Glutathione peroxidase family-an evolutionary overview. FEBS J. 2008, 275, 3959–3970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sun, G.R.; Wang, J.B.; Cao, W.Z.; Du, K.; Zhang, B. GST activity and its related indexes in the Chloroplasts of Puccinellia tenuiflora seedlings under Na2CO3 stress. Northwest Bot. Gaz. 2005, 25, 2495–2501. [Google Scholar]
  42. Avsian, K.O.; Gueta, D.Y.; Ben, H.G.; Eshdat, Y. Regulation of stress-induced phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase expression in citrus. Planta 1999, 4, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Beeor-Tzahar, T.; Ben-Hayyim, G.; Holland, D.; Faltun, Z.; Eshdat, Y. A stress-associated citrus protein is a distinct plant phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase. FEBS Lett. 1995, 366, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kim, Y.J.; Jang, M.G.; Noh, H.Y.; Lee, H.J.; Sukweenadhi, J.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, S.Y.; Kwon, W.S.; Yang, D.C. Molecular characterization of two glutathione peroxidase genes of Panax ginseng and their expression analysis against environmental stresses. Gene 2014, 1, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Roxas, V.P.; Smith, R.K., Jr.; Allen, E.R.; Allen, R.D. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nat. Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 988–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Roxas, V.P.; Lodhi, S.A.; Garrett, D.K.; Mahan, J.R.; Allen, R.D. Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco Seedlings that Overexpress Glutathione S-Transferase/Glutathione Peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Chang, W.; Sui, X.; Fan, X.X.; Jia, T.T. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Modulates Antioxidant Response and Ion Distribution in Salt-Stressed Elaeagnus angustifolia Seedlings. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Talaat, N.B.; Shawky, B.T. Protective effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants exposed to salinity. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 98, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yue, Y.N. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Plant Salt Tolerance in Songnen Saline Grassland; Northeast Forestry University: Haerbin, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  50. Sheng, M.; Tang, M.; Chen, H.; Yang, B.W.; Zhang, F.F.; Huang, Y.H. Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizae on photosynthesis and water status of maize plants under salt stress. Mycorrhiza 2008, 18, 287–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Lin, J.X.; Wang, Y.N.; Sun, S.N.; Mu, C.S.; Yan, X.F. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic pigments of Leymus chinensis seedlings under salt-alkali stress and nitrogen deposition. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 576, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, H.G. AMF to Improve the Mechanism of Salt Resistance of Lycium barbarum L.; Northwest A & F University: Yangling, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tang, J. Effects of Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) on Salinity Tolerance in the Cultivation of Healthy Vegetables; Sichuan Agricultural University: Yaan, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  54. Järvi, S.; Suorsa, M.; Aro, E.M. Photosystem II repair in plant chloroplasts-Regulation, assisting proteins and shared components with photosystem II biogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1847, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Greenberg, B.M.; Gaba, V.; Canaani, O.; Malkin, S.; Mattoo, A.K.; Edelman, M. Separate photosensitizers mediate degradation of the 32 kDa photosystem II reaction center protein in the visible and UV spectral regions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 6617–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhu, S.Q.; Xia, S.L.; Chen, Q. Advances in the regulation mechanism of photosystem IID1 protein expression. Guizhou Agric. Sci. 2012, 40, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  57. Guo, X. Role of Glutathione GRX in Response to Temperature Stress in Tomato. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  58. Jia, T.T.; Chang, W.; Fan, X.X. Effects of Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthetic and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings under salt stress. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2018, 38, 1337–1347. [Google Scholar]
  59. Phillips, J.M.; Hayman, D.S. Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1970, 55, 158–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, X.K.; Huang, S.L. Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experimental Principles and Technology, 3rd ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhang, Z.L.; Qu, W.J. Plant Physiology Experimental Guide, 3rd ed.; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wisniewski, J.R.; Zougman, A.; Nagaraj, N.; Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 2009, 6, 359–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Cox, J.; Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 6, 1367–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Del Pozo, J.C.; Allona, I.; Rubio, V.; Leyva, A.; de la Peña, A.; Aragoncillo, C.; Paz-Ares, J. A type 5 acid phosphatase gene from Arabidopsis thaliana is induced by phosphate starvation and by some other types of phosphate mobilising/oxidativestress conditions. Plant J. 1999, 19, 579–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Li, W.Y.; Shao, G.; Lam, H. Ectopic expression of GmPAP3 alleviates oxidative damage caused by salinity and osmotic stresses. New Phytol. 2008, 178, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Monroe, N.; Hill, C.P. Meiotic Clade AAA ATPases: Protein Polymer Disassembly Machines. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428 Pt B, 1897–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ren, Y.; Pan, H.; Yang, Y.; Pan, B.; Bu, W. Molecular cloning, characterization and functional analysis of a heat shock protein 70 gene in Cyclina sinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016, 58, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wong, J.H.; Cai, N.; Balmer, Y.; Tanaka, C.K.; Vensel, W.H.; Hurkman, W.J.; Buchanan, B.B. Thioredoxin targets of developing wheat seeds ide ntified by complementary proteomic approaches. Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 1629–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Traverso, J.A.; Vignols, F.; Cazalis, R.; Pulido, A.; Sahrawy, M.; Cejudo, F.J.; Meyer, Y.; Chueca, A. PsTRXh1 and PsTRXh2 Are Both Pea h-Type Thioredoxins with Antagonistic Behavior in Redox Imbalances. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, J.; Zhang, S.B.; Ma, D.; Ma, G.Y. Advances in Plant Actin Research. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2007, 35, 2860–2863. [Google Scholar]
  71. Song, J.H.; Zhang, L.X. Progress on the transmembrane protein in plant. J. Biol. 2009, 26, 62–64. [Google Scholar]
  72. Weber, T.; Parlati, F.; McNew, J.A.; Johnston, R.J.; Westermann, B.; Söllner, T.H.; Rothman, J.E. SNAREpins are functionally resistant to dis-ruption by NSF and αSNAP. J. Cell Biol. 2000, 149, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sun, X.L.; Yu, Q.Y.; Tang, L.L.; Ji, W.; Bai, X.; Cai, H.; Liu, X.F.; Ding, X.D.; Zhu, Y.M. GsSRK, a G-type lectin S-receptor-like serine/threonine protein kinase, is apositive regulator of plant tolerance to salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Ge, R.C.; Chen, G.P.; Zhao, B.C.; Shen, Y.Z.; Huang, Z.J. Cloning and functional characterization of a wheat serine/threoninekinase gene (TaSTK) related to salt-resistance. Plant Sci. 2007, 173, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lee, K.H.; Piao, H.L.; Kim, H.Y.; Choi, S.M.; Jiang, F.; Hartung, W.; Hwang, I.; Kwak, J.M.; Lee, I.J.; Hwang, I. Activation of glucosidase via stress-induced polymerization rapidly increases active pools of abscisic acid. Cell 2006, 126, 1109–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ge, C.; Wan, D.; Wang, Z.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shang, Q.; Ma, F.; Luo, S. A proteomic analysis of rice seedlings responding to 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene stress. J. Environ. Sci. 2008, 20, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Luo, P.; Shen, Y.X.; Jin, S.J. Overexpression of Rosa rugosa anthocyanidin reductase enhances tobacco tolerance to abiotic stress through increased ROS scavenging and modulation of ABA signaling. Plant Sci. 2016, 245, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, J.Q.; Zheng, S.X.; Yu, Z.N. Acetyl-CoA carboxylase: Advances in research on key enzymes of fatty acid metabolism and gene cloning. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. 2011, 17, 753–758. [Google Scholar]
  79. Zhang, Q.; Hrmova, M.; Shirley, N.J.; Lahnstein, J.; Fincher, G.B. Gene expression patterns and catalytic properties of UDP-D-glucose4-epimerases from barley Hordeum vulgare L. Biochem. J. 2006, 394, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Singh, S.; Virdi, A.S.; Jaswal, R. A temperature-responsive gene in sorghum encodes a glycine-rich protein that interacts with calmodulin. Biochimie 2017, 137, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gupta, A.; Kailasam, S.; Bansall, M. Insights into the Structural Dynamics of Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of tRNA by Exportin-t. Biophys. J. 2016, 110, 1264–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kohler, A.; Hurt, E. Exporting RNA from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Mattaj, I.W.; Englmeier, L. Nucleocytoplasmic transport: The soluble phase. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1998, 67, 265–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Aroca, R.; Porcel, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under drought, cold or salinity stresses? New Phytol. 2007, 73, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Geelen, D.; Leyman, B.; Batoko, H.; Di Sansebastiano, G.P.; Moore, I.; Blatt, M.R. The abscisic acid-related SNARE homolog NtSyr1contributes to secretion and growth: Evidence from competition with its cytosolic domain. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 387–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Iqbal, M.S.; Siddiqui, A.A.; Alam, A.; Goyal, M.; Banerjee, C.; Sarkar, S.; Mazumder, S.; De, R.; Nag, S.; Saha, S.J.; et al. Expression, purification and characterization of Plasmodium falciparum vacuolar protein sorting 29. Protein Expr. Purif. 2016, 120, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hong, J.K.; Choi, H.W.; Hwang, I.S.; Kim, D.S.; Kim, N.H.; Choi, D.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Hwang, B.K. Function of a novel GDSL-type pepper lipase gene, CaGLIP1, in disease sus-ceptibility and abiotic stress tolerance. Planta 2008, 227, 539–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Naranjo, M.; Forment, J.; Roldan, M.; Serrano, R.; Vicente, O. Overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana LTL1, a salt-induced gene encod-ing a GDSL-motif lipase, increases salt tolerance in yeast and transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2006, 29, 1890–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Li, N.N.; Qian, W.J.; Wang, L.; Cao, H.L.; Hao, X.Y.; Yang, Y.J.; Wang, X.C. Isolation and expression features of hexose kinase genes under various abiotic stresses in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis). J. Plant Physiol. 2017, 209, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Van Gisbergen, P.A.; Bezanilla, M. Plant formins: Membrane anchors for actin polymerization. Trends Cell Biol. 2013, 23, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 20 00788 g001 550
Figure 1. Growth of E. angustifolia inoculated AMF (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) under salt stress and a representative image of AMF colonization. Note: (A) represents the growth contrast in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal E. angustifolia after salt stress. (B) represents a photomicrograph of the structural colonization of AMF in the root of R. irregularis. AM, mycorrhizal; CK, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress; AR: Arbuscule; V: Vesicles. Scar bar: 20 μm.
Figure 1. Growth of E. angustifolia inoculated AMF (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi) under salt stress and a representative image of AMF colonization. Note: (A) represents the growth contrast in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal E. angustifolia after salt stress. (B) represents a photomicrograph of the structural colonization of AMF in the root of R. irregularis. AM, mycorrhizal; CK, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress; AR: Arbuscule; V: Vesicles. Scar bar: 20 μm.
Ijms 20 00788 g001
Ijms 20 00788 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of RI and CK on the soluble sugar content and soluble protein content in the leaves of E. angustifolia under salt stress. Note: (A) soluble protein, (B) soluble sugar. RI, mycorrhizal; CK, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress. Columns represent the means for three replicates (n = 3). Error bars show the standard error. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments at p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effects of RI and CK on the soluble sugar content and soluble protein content in the leaves of E. angustifolia under salt stress. Note: (A) soluble protein, (B) soluble sugar. RI, mycorrhizal; CK, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress. Columns represent the means for three replicates (n = 3). Error bars show the standard error. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments at p < 0.05.
Ijms 20 00788 g002
Ijms 20 00788 g003 550
Figure 3. Statistics of the number of proteins identified in each treatment group. Note: (A) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of CK group; (B) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of NaCl group; (C) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of AM group; (D) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of AM + NaCl group.
Figure 3. Statistics of the number of proteins identified in each treatment group. Note: (A) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of CK group; (B) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of NaCl group; (C) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of AM group; (D) the number of proteins identified in the three replicates of AM + NaCl group.
Ijms 20 00788 g003
Ijms 20 00788 g004 550
Figure 4. Biological functional classification of salt-tolerant proteins induced by symbiosis.
Figure 4. Biological functional classification of salt-tolerant proteins induced by symbiosis.
Ijms 20 00788 g004
Ijms 20 00788 g005 550
Figure 5. Venn diagram of the protein differential expression between the NaCl/CK group and AM + NaCl/AM group.
Figure 5. Venn diagram of the protein differential expression between the NaCl/CK group and AM + NaCl/AM group.
Ijms 20 00788 g005
Ijms 20 00788 g006 550
Figure 6. Biological functional classification of salt-induced mycorrhizal protein.
Figure 6. Biological functional classification of salt-induced mycorrhizal protein.
Ijms 20 00788 g006
Ijms 20 00788 g007 550
Figure 7. Biological functional classification of differential proteins.
Figure 7. Biological functional classification of differential proteins.
Ijms 20 00788 g007
Ijms 20 00788 g008 550
Figure 8. Secondary metabolism of the alleviation of salt stress in mycorrhizal E. angustifolia seedlings. Note: red color items represents proteins related to secondary metabolism in this study.CM: chorismate mutase; APT: anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase; HCT: shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase; CAD: cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAOMT: caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase.
Figure 8. Secondary metabolism of the alleviation of salt stress in mycorrhizal E. angustifolia seedlings. Note: red color items represents proteins related to secondary metabolism in this study.CM: chorismate mutase; APT: anthranilate phosphoribosyltransferase; HCT: shikimate O-hydroxycinnamoyltransferase; CAD: cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase; CCoAOMT: caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase.
Ijms 20 00788 g008
Ijms 20 00788 g009 550
Figure 9. Effects of AMF inoculation on the superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), peroxidase (POD) (C), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (D) activities in the leaves during different salt conditions. M, mycorrhizal; NM, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress. Columns represent the means for three plants (n = 3). Error bars show the standard error. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05. Note: cited from “Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Modulates Antioxidant Response and Ion Distribution in Salt-Stressed Elaeagnus angustifolia Seedlings” [47].
Figure 9. Effects of AMF inoculation on the superoxide dismutase (SOD) (A), catalase (CAT) (B), peroxidase (POD) (C), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) (D) activities in the leaves during different salt conditions. M, mycorrhizal; NM, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress. Columns represent the means for three plants (n = 3). Error bars show the standard error. Columns with different letters indicate significant differences between treatments at p < 0.05. Note: cited from “Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Modulates Antioxidant Response and Ion Distribution in Salt-Stressed Elaeagnus angustifolia Seedlings” [47].
Ijms 20 00788 g009
Ijms 20 00788 g010 550
Figure 10. Protein—interaction network interactions for differentially expressed proteins. Note: shows the integrated network for all the differentially expressed proteins; yellow circle represents salt tolerance-related proteins induced by symbiosis and salt-induced mycorrhizal protein in this study; green circle represents other differentially expressed proteins in this study, respectively. The sizes represent the abundance of differentially expressed proteins.
Figure 10. Protein—interaction network interactions for differentially expressed proteins. Note: shows the integrated network for all the differentially expressed proteins; yellow circle represents salt tolerance-related proteins induced by symbiosis and salt-induced mycorrhizal protein in this study; green circle represents other differentially expressed proteins in this study, respectively. The sizes represent the abundance of differentially expressed proteins.
Ijms 20 00788 g010
Ijms 20 00788 g011 550
Figure 11. Mechanisms of mycorrhizal E. angustifolia seedlings to alleviate salt stress. Note: Protein folding and degradation: peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP12; FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5 isoform 1; peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CYP18-1; peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP62; prefoldin subunit 1; prefoldin subunit 2; Heat shock 70 kDa partial; small heat shock protein 17.3 kDa; E3 ubiquitin ligase (UPL3); ubiquitin-like 1-activating enzyme (E1 B). PMCA: calcium-transporting ATPase; CaM: calmodulin; CML: calcium-binding CML20; CDPK: calcium-dependent kinase; POD: peroxidase; GST: glutathione S-transferase; GPX: glutathione peroxidase; GRX:glutaredoxin; TRX:thioredoxin; D1:photosystem II D1 precursor processing PSB27; EF-Tu: elongation factor mitochondrial; NADH: NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 7; Fes: NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur mitochondrial; Cytc: cytochrome c oxidase subunit mitochondrial.
Figure 11. Mechanisms of mycorrhizal E. angustifolia seedlings to alleviate salt stress. Note: Protein folding and degradation: peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP12; FKBP-type peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase 5 isoform 1; peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase CYP18-1; peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase FKBP62; prefoldin subunit 1; prefoldin subunit 2; Heat shock 70 kDa partial; small heat shock protein 17.3 kDa; E3 ubiquitin ligase (UPL3); ubiquitin-like 1-activating enzyme (E1 B). PMCA: calcium-transporting ATPase; CaM: calmodulin; CML: calcium-binding CML20; CDPK: calcium-dependent kinase; POD: peroxidase; GST: glutathione S-transferase; GPX: glutathione peroxidase; GRX:glutaredoxin; TRX:thioredoxin; D1:photosystem II D1 precursor processing PSB27; EF-Tu: elongation factor mitochondrial; NADH: NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 7; Fes: NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur mitochondrial; Cytc: cytochrome c oxidase subunit mitochondrial.
Ijms 20 00788 g011
Table
Table 1. Effects of RI and CK on the height, diameter, and roots of E. angustifolia under salt stress.
Table 1. Effects of RI and CK on the height, diameter, and roots of E. angustifolia under salt stress.
Level of Salinity/(mmol/L)Different TreatmentHeight/(cm)Diameter/(mm)Length/(cm)Area/(cm2)
0CK45.50 ± 0.24c5.65 ± 0.17b985.73 ± 27.80b146.04 ± 5.98c
RI49.07 ± 0.54a6.54 ± 0.20a1256.7 ± 22.52a213.07 ± 13.04a
Significance********
300CK39.57 ± 0.26f3.99 ± 0.14e763.64 ± 23.34e93.68 ± 6.27e
RI43.17 ± 0.21de4.82 ± 0.11d896.56 ± 42.36bcd126.96 ± 8.03cd
Significance*******
RI, mycorrhizal; CK, non-mycorrhizal; 0 mmol/L, without salt stress; 300 mmol/L, during salt stress. Data are means ± SD (standard deviation) of six replicates. The same letter within each column shows no significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05). Levels of significance: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 2. Differentially expressed proteins between treatments.
Table 2. Differentially expressed proteins between treatments.
TreatmentsNumber of Differential Proteins
NaCl vs CK variation analysis402 a + 335 b
AM vs CK variation analysis35 a + 152 b
AM + NaCl vs AM variation analysis166 a + 226 b
AM + NaCl vs NaCl variation analysis62 a + 189 b
a: The number of proteins was the satisfied condition (ratio > ±2 and p value < 0.05); b: The number of proteins was only detected at CK or treatments (NaCl, AM, AM + NaCl).
Table
Table 3. Maxquant software parameter table.
Table 3. Maxquant software parameter table.
ItemValue
Main search ppm6
Missed cleavage2
MS/MS tolerance ppm20
De-IsotopicTrue
EnzymeTrypsin
DatabaseP16440_Unigene.fasta.transdecoder_73797_20161212.fasta
Fixed modificationCarbamidomethyl (C)
Variable modificationOxidation(M), Acetyl (Protein N-term)
Decoy database patternreverse
LFQTrue
LFQ min. ratio count1
Match between runs2min
Peptide FDR0.01
Protein FDR0.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, T.; Wang, J.; Chang, W.; Fan, X.; Sui, X.; Song, F. Proteomics Analysis of E. angustifolia Seedlings Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030788

AMA Style

Jia T, Wang J, Chang W, Fan X, Sui X, Song F. Proteomics Analysis of E. angustifolia Seedlings Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Salt Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20(3):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030788

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Tingting, Jian Wang, Wei Chang, Xiaoxu Fan, Xin Sui, and Fuqiang Song. 2019. "Proteomics Analysis of E. angustifolia Seedlings Inoculated with Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi under Salt Stress" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 3: 788. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop