Next Article in Journal
The Cutaneous Microbiome and Wounds: New Molecular Targets to Promote Wound Healing
Previous Article in Journal
FK506 Attenuates the MRP1-Mediated Chemoresistant Phenotype in Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 9
10.3390/ijms19092698
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CaSK23, a Putative GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase of Capsicum annuum, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Pepper’s Response to Ralstonia solanacearum Attack

by
Ailian Qiu
1,2,†,
Ji Wu
1,2,†,
Yufen Lei
2,
Yiting Cai
2,
Song Wang
2,
Zhiqin Liu
2,
Deyi Guan
2 and
Shuilin He
2,*
1
College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
2
Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Breeding and Comprehensive Utilization, Ministry of Education/FAFU, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(9), 2698; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092698
Submission received: 13 July 2018 / Revised: 31 August 2018 / Accepted: 3 September 2018 / Published: 11 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
GSK3-like kinases have been mainly implicated in the brassinosteroids (BR) pathway and, therefore, in plant growth, development, and responses to abiotic stresses; however, their roles in plant immunity remain poorly understood. Herein, we present evidence that CaSK23, a putative GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase in pepper, acts as a negative regulator in pepper’s response to Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum) inoculation (RSI). Data from quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) showed that the constitutively-expressed CaSK23 in pepper leaves was down-regulated by RSI, as well as by exogenously-applied salicylic acid (SA) or methyl jasomonate (MeJA). Silencing of CaSK23 by virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) decreased the susceptibility of pepper plants to RSI, coupled with up-regulation of the tested genes encoding SA-, JA-, and ethylene (ET)-dependent pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins. In contrast, ectopic overexpression (OE) of CaSK23 conferred a compromised resistance of tobacco plants to RSI, accompanied by down-regulation of the tested immunity-associated SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent PR genes. In addition, transient overexpression of CaSK23 in pepper plants consistently led to down-regulation of the tested SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent PR genes. We speculate that CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper immunity and its constitutive expression represses pepper immunity in the absence of pathogens. On the other hand, its decreased expression derepresses immunity when pepper plants are attacked by pathogens.

1. Introduction

During their life cycles, plants are frequently exposed to various stresses, such as pathogens, in their habitats. To survive, plants constantly remodel their growth, development, and defense reactions in a coordinated manner by transcriptional, metabolic, and physiological reprogramming. For example, plants prioritize defense over growth in the presence of stress [1,2], and then turn off defense reactions in the absence or resolution of stress [3]. This adaptive behavior requires the accurate perception and transformation of stress signals into appropriate defense outputs by signaling networks and transcriptional cascades. Identified signaling cascades include signals mediated by Ca2+ [4,5,6,7,8], GTPases [9,10], Reactive oxygen species (ROS) [8,11,12], phytohormones such as salicylic acid (SA) [13,14,15], jasmonic acid (JA) [16,17], ethylene (ET) [18], ABA [19], brassinosteroid (BR) [20], cytokinin (CK), and gibberellin (GA) [6,21,22,23], as well as by various kinases, phosphatases [24,25,26], or transcription factors [27,28,29]. These cascades might act as positive or negative regulators to fine-tune plant defense responses, leading to appropriate immune outputs. However, the majority of components in these signaling networks remain to be identified.
GSK3 (Glycogen synthase kinase 3)-like kinases, also known as SHAGGY-like kinases, were originally identified in animals [30], and were then also found in plants [31]. GSK3 proteins are encoded by multiple gene families in plants, with 10 members in Arabidopsis [32], and GSK family members can be classified into four subgroups [33]. Early studies focused on the roles of GSK3-like kinases in BR signaling [33,34,35,36,37,38]. For example, the crucial component BIN2, one of the three members in group II of GSK3-like kinases, is a negative regulator in the BR signaling pathway [31,38,39,40,41]. In addition to their role in BR signaling, GSK3 kinases have also been implicated in processes such as carbohydrate metabolism [42], cell growth, root and stomatal cell development, flower development, xylem differentiation, light response, abiotic stress responses [37,43,44], and plant immunity [45,46,47,48,49]. GSK3 kinases also influence the crosstalk among auxin, JA, abscisic acid, and BR pathways [34,41,50,51,52,53]. As the information about GSK3 kinases comes from the model plant Arabidopsis, the roles of GSK3 family members in other non-model plants, especially in immunity, remain poorly understood.
The productivity and quality of pepper plants (Capsicum annuum), a crop of worldwide agricultural importance, are frequently decreased by diseases such as Phytophthora blight and bacterial wilt R. solanacearum is a devastating soil-borne bacterium that causes wilting disease in over 200 economically-important plant species, including pepper and tobacco, and the bacterial wilting caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is one of the most influential diseases affecting pepper production worldwide. An analysis of pepper’s transcriptional response to R. solanacearum inoculation (RSI) revealed a putative GSK, named CaSK23, which was down-regulated by RSI. We studied its role in pepper immunity against RSI, and our data indicated that CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper resistance to R. solanacearum attack.

2. Results

2.1. Cloning and Sequence Analysis of CaSK23

A positive cDNA clone was acquired based on the cDNA-AFLP assay on differentially-expressed pepper leaf genes after exogenous application of SA, as well as the PCR-based cDNA library screening. Its deduced amino acid sequence harbors a conserved Ser/Thr kinase domain, in which the highly conserved arginine 144, arginine 229, and lysine 254 constitute a phosphate binding pocket (Figure S1a) [54]. The predicted molecular weight and theoretical isoelectric point of the deduced protein were 50,486.0 and 8.0 Da, respectively. Because homology searching revealed that the deduced amino acid sequence shares the highest sequence similarities to AtSK23 (77.8%) among all of the clade II GSK kinases in Arabidopsis, including AtSK21/BIN2 (77.4%), AtSK22/AtGSK1 (73.8%), and AtSKetha (72.7%) (Figure S1b), it was named CaSK23 (SK of Capsicum annuum). In addition, CaSK23 shares 86.1%, 70.9%, 73.6%, and 65.8% sequence similarities with PSK8, PSK9 (Petunia hybrida), SK1-A (Triticumaestivum), and SK2 (Physcomitrella patens), respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first GSK to be characterized in pepper plants.

2.2. Transcriptional Expression of CaSK23 in Pepper Organs and Leaves after R. solanacearum or Exogenoushormones

To examine the transcript levels of CaSK23 in different pepper plant organs, total RNA from organs was isolated and used as templates for quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) with a specific primer pair of CaSK23, based on its 3′-UTR. The results demonstrated that CaSK23 is constitutively expressed in all of the tested organs, including the root, stem, leaf, flower, and fruit. The highest level was found in the leaf, followed by the fruit (Figure 1). In addition, transcriptional expression of CaSK23 in pepper leaves after RSI was also detected by qRT-PCR, the total RNA of pepper leaves inoculated with R. solanacearum strain FJC100301 [55], was isolated, and subjected to qRT-PCR. Inoculation of R. solanacearum significantly enhanced the relative transcriptional expression of a SA-dependent PR1 gene [56], but significantly down-regulated CaSK23 after 3 hpi, indicating that CaSK23 might act as a negative regulator in pepper’s response to R. solanacearum. SA, JA, and ET act as general signaling molecules and play crucial roles in plant responses to pathogens. To assess the possible involvement of CaSK23 in signaling mediated by these hormones, the transcriptional abundance of CaSK23 was determined by qRT-PCR in four-leaf pepper plants exogenously treated with SA, MeJA-, and ETH (ethephon, which can be converted to ethylene by plant metabolism). The validity of exogenous applications of tested hormones was confirmed by qRT-PCR analyses of the SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent marker genes such as PR1 [56], PIN2 [57], and ACC oxidase [57], respectively. The results revealed that the relative expression of CaSK23 was reduced from 3 to 48 h post-treatment (hpt) in pepper leaves treated with 5 mM of SA or 100 μM MeJA. The lowest relative expression level of CaSK23 in pepper leaves treated by the exogenous application of SA was observed from12 to 24 hpt, whereas that of the known SA-responsive marker gene CaPR1 was dramatically up-regulated, while upon the application of MeJA, the lowest level of CaSK23 transcript was observed at 12 hpt. The application of 10 mM of ETH did not affect the expression of CaSK23 significantly (Figure 2).

2.3. Silencing of CaSK23 by VIGS Decreased Susceptibility of Pepper Plants to R. solanacearum

Since CaSK23 was found to be down-regulated by both RSI and exogenously-applied SA or MeJA, we speculated that CaSK23 might play a role in pepper immunity. To test this possibility, we employed a VIGS approach, which has been frequently used in functional genomic studies in Solanaceae [58,59,60,61]. To avoid the possible silencing of other homologues, a 139-bp specific fragment of CaSK23 in the 3′-UTR was used to construct the VIGS vector pYL279-CaSK23. qRT-PCR was used to measure the silencing efficiency of CaSK23 in R. solanacearum-inoculated CaSK23-VIGS pepper plants at 72 hpi. We found that the CaSK23 transcript level was reduced to approximately 20% of that in pYL279 plants (Figure 3a). CaSK23-silenced pepper plants showed decreased disease symptoms compared to control plants at seven days post-inoculation (dpi), indicating that the silencing of CaSK23 attenuated R. solanacearum susceptibility (Figure 3b). In addition, the growth of R. solanacearum was found to be decreased in CaSK23 silencing plants compared to that in the control plants (Figure 3c). Consistent with decreased R. solanacearum susceptibility in CaSK23-silenced pepper plants, the transcript levels of defense-related pepper genes, including CaPR1, CaSAR82A, CaPIN2, and ACC oxidase, were all found to be enhanced in CaSK23-silenced plants compared to pYL279 pepper plants (Figure 3d).

2.4. Ectopic Overexpression of CaSK23 Increased Susceptibility of Transgenic Tobacco Plants to R. solanacearum

Because it is difficult to obtain transgenic pepper plants, we generated transgenic tobacco lines and used the T3 homozygous plants, which constitutively express CaSK23, for the functional characterization of CaSK23 in plant immunity. No phenotypic differences were found among plants of the nine T3 lines and the K326 tobacco plants, while high transcript levels of CaSK23 were detected in the T3 lines (Figure 4a). The FJC100301 strain of R. solanacearum was used to inoculate the plants of five randomly selected T3 lines and K326 plants. All tested transgenic lines exhibited enhanced disease symptoms in response to RSI at 7 dpi compared to K326 plants. One line (CaSK23-OE1) was selected to assay in detail, and clear wilting symptoms were observed in CaSK23-OE1 plants inoculated with FJC100301 at 7 dpi, whereas K326 plants exhibited only slight wilting symptoms (Figure 4b). In addition, the growth of R. solanacearum was found to be enhanced by the overexpression of CaSK23, since a significantly higher number of colony-forming units (cfu) of the pathogen at 48 hpi were found in R. solanacearum inoculated CaSK23-OE1 plants compared to the wild-type tobacco plants (Figure 4c).
In addition, we measured the transcription of immunity-associated genes, including SA-responsive genes NtNPR1 and NtPR2, JA-responsive NtPR1b, and ET-biosynthesis-associated NtEFE26, in transgenic tobacco plants without RSI. We found that expression levels of tested genes in transgenic tobacco plants were similar to or below those in K326 plants (Figure 4d). Although immunity-associated genes were up-regulated by RSI to varying degrees, the tested immunity-associated marker genes were significantly lower in transgenic tobacco plants than those in wild-type (WT) plants (Figure 4e).

2.5. Transient Expression of CaSK23 Suppressed Expression of Defense-Associated Marker Genes in Pepper Leaves

The transient expression approach, which has been frequently utilized to analyze the potential role of a given gene in immunity in Solanaceae [62,63], was employed to confirm the results from tobacco plants, in which the ectopic overexpression of CaSK23 compromised immunity. This result demonstrated that transient overexpression of CaSK23 significantly down-regulated all of the tested immunity-associated marker genes, including CaPR1, CaSAR82A, CaPIN2, and ACC oxidase (Figure 5), which were found to be enhanced in R. solanacearum-inoculated CaSK23-silenced pepper plants.

3. Discussion

While the roles of GSK3 kinases are well established in BR signaling for plant growth and development, limited information exists about the roles of GSK3 kinases in plant immunity, especially in non-model plants like peppers. In the present study, our data indicated that a putative GSK3, termed CaSK23, acts as a negative regulator in the pepper response to RSI.
The evidence that CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper response to R. solanacearum attack comes from the following data. CaSK23 silencing by VIGS in pepper plants significantly boosted the resistance of pepper plants to RSI, which was confirmed by the accompanied upregulation of PR genes, including CaPR1, CaBPR1, CaSAR82A, CaPIN2, and ACC oxidase in CaSK23-VIGS pepper plants. These genes were previously found to confer pepper disease resistance and have been frequently used as immunity-associated SA-, JA-, or ET-dependent marker genes [57,64,65,66,67,68,69]. In contrast, the overexpression of CaSK23 significantly compromised the resistance of transgenic tobacco plants to RSI, and the PR genes that have been previously linked to disease resistance in tobacco, such as SA-responsive NtNPR1 [70,71], NtPR1 [71], JA-responsive NtPR1b [72], and ET-biosynthesis-related EFE26 [72], were down-regulated or unchanged in CaSK23-overexpressing plants that were not inoculated with R. solanacearum, compared to WT plants. However, in CaSK23-overexpressing plants that were inoculated with R. solanacearum, all tested PR genes were significantly down-regulated compared to WT control plants, suggesting that transcriptional modification of these PR genes by overexpression of CaSK23 was influenced by R. solanacearum attack. A similar phenomenon of transcriptional modification of target genes by R. solanacearum was observed in our previous functional characterization of CaWRKY27 and CaWRKY40 [55,73]. Consistently, in pepper leaves transiently overexpressing CaSK23, PR genes were also significantly down-regulated compared to control leaves. All these data strongly suggest that CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper’s response to R. solanacearum attack. As plant immunity is an energy- and resource-intensive process [74], it should be tightly regulated. Negative regulators have been found to be frequently involved in the regulation of plant immunity [3,60,75]; these regulators are thought to prevent the appropriate activation of defense responses at suboptimal concentrations of signal molecules or to turn off systemic acquired resistance (SAR) once the invasion of pathogens has been resolved [75]. Since CaSK23 is constitutively expressed in pepper plants and is down-regulated by RSI, we speculate that this expression in the absence of pathogen attack may play a role in attenuating immunity to reduce fitness costs, and this restrained immunity may be released by down-regulation of CaSK23 when the pepper plants are challenged by pathogens such as R. solanacearum.
The plant hormones SA, JA, and ET play key roles in the regulation of the defense signaling network that is recruited upon perception of an invader [76,77,78,79]. SA-induced defenses were originally found to be specific in a plant’s response to pathogens with a biotrophic lifestyle, whereas JA- or ET-mediated defense is involved in necrotrophic pathogens [78]. The signaling pathways mediated by SA and JA have been found to interact with each other, and it is believed that they interact synergistically in PAMP triggered immunity, but in a compensatory manner in effector triggered immunity [80,81]. Our present data showed that the transcriptional expression of CaSK23 was significantly down-regulated by the exogenous application of SA or MeJA, but not by that of ETH. As synergistic relationships between SA, JA, and ET signaling have been previously found in pepper immunity against R. solanacearum [55,58,59,82], the down-regulation of CaSK23 by R. solanacearum inoculation was consistent with its down-regulation by the exogenous application of SA or MeJA. This result further supports the role of CaSK23 as a negative regulator in pepper immunity against R. solanacearum. However, inconsistent to that, CaSK23 was not down-regulated by the exogenous application of ETH, and ET signaling associated marker gene ACC oxidase or EFE26 was upregulated in CaSK23-VIGS pepper plants and down-regulated in CaSK23 overexpressing tobacco plants or CaSK23 transiently overexpressing pepper plants. One explanation for this inconsistency is that some of the possible convergent components of SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent signaling might be modified by CaSK23. For example, CabZIP63, CaWRKY27, CaWRKY40, and CaWRKY58 were previously found to be synergistically regulated by exogenous SA, JA, or ET, and they can synergistically modify SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent signaling pathways [55,60,73,82,83]. Additionally, CaSK23 might synergistically modify the SA-, JA-, and ET-dependent signaling through modification of these kind of convergent components. Identification of the possible downstream convergent components in the future would provide insight into the underlying mechanism of immunity mediated by CaSK23.
Taken together, our data suggest that CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper’s response to R. solanacearum attack, and the constitutive expression of CaSK23 might partially suppress immunity by blocking SA and JA dependent signaling in the absence of pathogen, while its decreased expression derepresses immunity when pepper plants are attacked by pathogens (Figure 6). As GSK3 kinases have been implicated in BR signaling [33,34,35,36,37,38], crosstalk between SA-, JA-, and BR-dependent signaling has frequently been found [22,84], and the possible role of CaSK23 in BR signaling and in crosstalk between SA-, JA-, and BR-mediated signaling remains to be elucidated in the future.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

The seeds of pepper (Capsicum annuum) inbred line 8#, tobacco (Nicotianatabacum) cultivar K326, and its T2 or T3 transgenic lines, were sown in a soil mix [peat moss:perlite, 2:1 (v/v)] in plastic pots. Pots were placed in a growth room under conditions of 25 °C, 60–70 μmol photons m−2·s−1, a relative humidity of 70%, and a 16/8 h photoperiod.

4.2. Isolation of CaSK23 and Its Sequence Analysis

A cDNA-AFLP profiling experiment searching for genes that differentially respond to exogenous SA application identified a transcript-derived fragment (TDF) that was down-regulated by exogenous SA treatment in pepper plants (our unpublished data), with a high sequence similarity to associated GSK3-like kinases. Full-length cDNAs were isolated by PCR-based 96-well screening with the specific primers derived from TDFs described by Munroe and colleagues [87]. Positive clones (λTriplEx2) were converted to a pTriplEx2 by in vivo excision following the user manual and sequenced by TaKaRa (Dalian, China).

4.3. Vector Construction

To construct a vector for overexpression, the full-length open reading frame (ORF) of CaSK23 was cloned into the entry vector pDONR207 by a BP reaction, and was then transferred into the destination vector pK7WG2 (35S::CaSK23) by an LR reaction (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). To construct a vector for virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), a part of the 3′-Untranslated Region (UTR) of CaSK23 was cloned into the destination vector pYL279 by the same gateway technology (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). All the primers used in vector construction are listed in Table S1.

4.4. Pathogens and Inoculation Procedures

A highly virulent R. solanacearum strain FJC100301 was isolated from wilted pepper samples from the Fujian province (China) and amplified according to a previously described method [55].
For total RNA isolation and real-time RT-PCR analysis of the expression of CaSK23 against RSI, pepper plants were inoculated by injecting 10 µL of the resulting R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) into the fourth leaves from the top using a syringe with a needle at its sixth to eighth leaf stage. The respective third leaves were harvested at the indicated time points for the preparation of RNA. For the phenotypic effect analysis of CaSK23 overexpression and CaSK23 silencing on RSI and on the expression of immunity associated maker genes in tobacco plants and CaSK23-VIGS pepper plants, respectively, the root of tobacco or pepper plants were slightly wounded by a pair of sterile scissors, and the wounded plants were inoculated with 5.0 mL R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) by root irrigation and were harvested at indicated time points.

4.5. Treatment of Plants with Exogenous Hormones

Pepper plants at the four-leaf stage were sprayed with 5 mM salicylic acid (SA) (in 10% distilled ethanol), 100 µM methyl jasmonate (MeJA) (in 10% distilled ethanol), or 10 mM ethephon (ETH) (in sterile ddH2O). Mock treatments were performed by spraying with corresponding solvents or ddH2O.

4.6. VIGS of CaSK23 in Pepper Plants

For VIGS of CaSK23 in pepper plants, GV3101 cells containing pYL192, in addition to GV3101 cells containing pYL279-CaSK23 or pYL279 (negative control), were resuspended in the induction medium (10 mM MES, 10 mM MgCl2, 200 µM acetosyringone, pH 5.6), respectively, and mixed at a 1:1 ratio. The mixed GV3101 cells were co-injected into the cotyledons of two-week-old pepper plants. Our previous studies report more details on this process [55,58,59,73,82].

4.7. Transient Expression of CaSK23 in Pepper Leaves

For transient expression analysis, GV3101 harboring either 35S::CaSK23 or 35S::00 (negative control) was grown overnight, separately, and then resuspended in induction medium. The bacterial suspension (OD600 = 0.8) was injected into leaves of pepper plants at the eight-leaf stage using a syringe without a needle, and then injected leaves were collected at indicated time points for further analysis.

4.8. Construction of Transgenic CaSK23-Overexpressing Tobacco Lines

Leaf disks of tobacco (N. tabacum cv.) K326 were transformed with GV3101 harboring 35S::CaSK23, as described previously [88]. The initial transgenic tobacco lines (T0) were selected by kanamycin, and seven transgenic lines were further confirmed by CaSK23-specific primers by PCR and RT-PCR, respectively. T1 seeds were collected from regenerated T0 plants, T2 or T3 seeds were collected in a similar way, and T3 seeds were used for future analysis.

4.9. Quantitative Real-Time RT-PCR

To determine the relative transcription levels of selected genes, qPCR was performed with specific primers (Table S1) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the BIO-RAD Real-time PCR system (Foster City, CA, USA) and the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II system (TaKaRa). The procedures for total RNA preparation and qPCR were carried out as previously reported [73,82,89]. Three independent biological replicates of each treatment were performed, and three technical replicates were performed for each biological replicate. Data were analyzed using the Livak method [90]. Relative transcript levels of analyzed pepper or tobacco genes were normalized to the transcript levels of CaActin or NtEF1α, respectively. All primers used in qPCRare are listed in Table S1.

4.10. Accession Numbers

Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL data libraries under the following accession numbers: pepper CaPR1 (AF053343), pepper CaSAR82A (AF313766), pepper CaPIN2 (AAB94771), pepper CaACC Oxidase (AB434925), pepper CaActin (AY572427), tobacco NtNPR1 (U76707), tobacco NtPR2 (M60460), tobacco NtPR1b (X66942), tobacco NtEFE26 (Z29529), and tobacco NtEF1a (D63396).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/9/2698/s1.

Author Contributions

A.Q., J.W., and Y.L. performed primary experiments; A.Q. analyzed the data and wrote the paper; Y.C. and S.W. conducted replication genotyping with the transgenic plants; Z.L. and D.G. was involved in the real-time PCR analysis; S.H. initiated and supervised the study and designed the experiments. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401890, 31501767, 31572136).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mark D. Curtis for kindly providing the gateway destination vectors, and S.P. Dinesh-Kumar (Yale University) for the pYL192 and pYL279 vectors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, R.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Zhou, G.; Wang, Q.; Bian, W.; Erb, M.; Lou, Y. Prioritizing plant defence over growth through WRKY regulation facilitates infestation by non-target herbivores. eLife 2015, 4, e04805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lozano-Duran, R.; Macho, A.P.; Boutrot, F.; Segonzac, C.; Somssich, I.E.; Zipfel, C. The transcriptional regulator BZR1 mediates trade-off between plant innate immunity and growth. eLife 2013, 2, e00983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Oh, S.K.; Baek, K.H.; Park, J.M.; Yi, S.Y.; Yu, S.H.; Kamoun, S.; Choi, D. Capsicum annuum WRKY protein CaWRKY1 is a negative regulator of pathogen defense. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 977–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ma, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Walker, R.K.; Berkowitz, G.A. Molecular steps in the immune signaling pathway evoked by plant elicitor peptides: Ca2+-dependent protein kinases, nitric oxide, and reactive oxygen species are downstream from the early Ca2+ signal. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1459–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ivashuta, S.; Liu, J.; Lohar, D.P.; Haridas, S.; Bucciarelli, B.; Vanden Bosch, K.A.; Vance, C.P.; Harrison, M.J.; Gantt, J.S. RNA interference identifies a calcium-dependent protein kinase involved in Medicago truncatula root development. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 2911–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tuteja, N.; Sopory, S.K. Chemical signaling under abiotic stress environment in plants. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Trewavas, A.J.; Malho, R. Ca2+ signalling in plant cells: The big network! Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Steinhorst, L.; Kudla, J. Signaling in cells and organisms—Calcium holds the line. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 22, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Poraty-Gavra, L.; Zimmermann, P.; Haigis, S.; Bednarek, P.; Hazak, O.; Stelmakh, O.R.; Sadot, E.; Schulze-Lefert, P.; Gruissem, W.; Yalovsky, S. The Arabidopsis Rho of plants GTPase AtROP6 functions in developmental and pathogen response pathways. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161, 1172–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Yang, Z. Signaling tip growth in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsukagoshi, H. Control of root growth and development by reactive oxygen species. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 29, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wrzaczek, M.; Brosche, M.; Kangasjarvi, J. ROS signaling loops—Production, perception, regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 575–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yan, S.; Dong, X. Perception of the plant immune signal salicylic acid. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Kachroo, A.; Robin, G.P. Systemic signaling during plant defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shah, J. The salicylic acid loop in plant defense. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Farmer, E.E.; Almeras, E.; Krishnamurthy, V. Jasmonates and related oxylipins in plant responses to pathogenesis and herbivory. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Reymond, P.; Farmer, E.E. Jasmonate and salicylate as global signals for defense gene expression. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Merchante, C.; Alonso, J.M.; Stepanova, A.N. Ethylene signaling: Simple ligand, complex regulation. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Giraudat, J. Abscisic acid signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995, 7, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Belkhadir, Y.; Jaillais, Y. The molecular circuitry of brassinosteroid signaling. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 522–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Denance, N.; Sanchez-Vallet, A.; Goffner, D.; Molina, A. Disease resistance or growth: The role of plant hormones in balancing immune responses and fitness costs. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. An, C.; Mou, Z. Salicylic acid and its function in plant immunity. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2011, 53, 412–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Fortuna, A.; Lee, J.; Ung, H.; Chin, K.; Moeder, W.; Yoshioka, K. Crossroads of stress responses, development and flowering regulation—The multiple roles of Cyclic Nucleotide Gated Ion Channel 2. Plant Signal. Behav. 2015, 10, e989758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, X.; Xiong, Y.; Defraia, C.; Schmelz, E.; Mou, Z. The Arabidopsis MAP kinase kinase 7: A crosstalk point between auxin signaling and defense responses? Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3, 272–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meldau, S.; Ullman-Zeunert, L.; Govind, G.; Bartram, S.; Baldwin, I.T. MAPK-dependent JA and SA signalling in Nicotiana attenuata affects plant growth and fitness during competition with conspecifics. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Fiil, B.K.; Petersen, K.; Petersen, M.; Mundy, J. Gene regulation by MAP kinase cascades. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Rushton, P.J.; Bokowiec, M.T.; Han, S.; Zhang, H.; Brannock, J.F.; Chen, X.; Laudeman, T.W.; Timko, M.P. Tobacco transcription factors: Novel insights into transcriptional regulation in the Solanaceae. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147, 280–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Buscaill, P.; Rivas, S. Transcriptional control of plant defence responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2014, 20, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Qu, L.J.; Zhu, Y.X. Transcription factor families in Arabidopsis: Major progress and outstanding issues for future research. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 544–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Cohen, P.; Yellowlees, D.; Aitken, A.; Donella-Deana, A.; Hemmings, B.A.; Parker, P.J. Separation and characterisation of glycogen synthase kinase 3, glycogen synthase kinase 4 and glycogen synthase kinase 5 from rabbit skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Biochem. 1982, 124, 21–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yan, Z.; Zhao, J.; Peng, P.; Chihara, R.K.; Li, J. BIN2 functions redundantly with other Arabidopsis GSK3-like kinases to regulate brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Physiol. 2009, 150, 710–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yoo, M.J.; Albert, V.A.; Soltis, P.S.; Soltis, D.E. Phylogenetic diversification of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2006, 6, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jonak, C.; Hirt, H. Glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases in plants: An emerging family with novel functions. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bittner, T.; Campagne, S.; Neuhaus, G.; Rensing, S.A.; Fischer-Iglesias, C. Identification and characterization of two wheat Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinases. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bittner, T.; Nadler, S.; Schulze, E.; Fischer-Iglesias, C. Two homolog wheat Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/SHAGGY—Like kinases are involved in brassinosteroid signaling. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Khan, M.; Rozhon, W.; Bigeard, J.; Pflieger, D.; Husar, S.; Pitzschke, A.; Teige, M.; Jonak, C.; Hirt, H.; Poppenberger, B. Brassinosteroid-regulated GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases phosphorylate mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase kinases, which control stomata development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 7519–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Youn, J.H.; Kim, T.W. Functional insights of plant GSK3-like kinases: Multi-taskers in diverse cellular signal transduction pathways. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 552–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, J.; Nam, K.H. Regulation of brassinosteroid signaling by a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase. Science 2002, 295, 1299–1301. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. He, J.X.; Gendron, J.M.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.Y. The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 10185–10190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ye, H.; Li, L.; Guo, H.; Yin, Y. MYBL2 is a substrate of GSK3-like kinase BIN2 and acts as a corepressor of BES1 in brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20142–20147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, X.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Ouyang, Z.; Hong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, D.; Song, F. Tomato SR/CAMTA transcription factors SlSR1 and SlSR3L negatively regulate disease resistance response and SlSR1L positively modulates drought stress tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kempa, S.; Rozhon, W.; Samaj, J.; Erban, A.; Baluska, F.; Becker, T.; Haselmayer, J.; Schleiff, E.; Kopka, J.; Hirt, H.; et al. A plastid-localized glycogen synthase kinase 3 modulates stress tolerance and carbohydrate metabolism. Plant J. 2007, 49, 1076–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, K.Z.; Jiang, M.; Wang, M.; Xue, S.; Zhu, L.L.; Wang, H.Z.; Zou, J.J.; Lee, E.K.; Sack, F.; Le, J. Phosphorylation of Serine 186 of bHLH Transcription Factor SPEECHLESS Promotes Stomatal Development in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 783–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koh, S.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, M.K.; Koh, J.H.; Lee, S.; An, G.; Choe, S.; Kim, S.R. T-DNA tagged knockout mutation of rice OsGSK1, an orthologue of Arabidopsis BIN2, with enhanced tolerance to various abiotic stresses. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 65, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Stratmann, J.W.; Ryan, C.A. Myelin basic protein kinase activity in tomato leaves is induced systemically by wounding and increases in response to systemin and oligosaccharide elicitors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11085–11089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Wrzaczek, M.; Rozhon, W.; Jonak, C. A Proteasome-regulated glycogen synthase kinase-3 modulates disease response in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 5249–5255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dogra, S.C.; Eini, O.; Rezaian, M.A.; Randles, J.W. A novel shaggy-like kinase interacts with the Tomato leaf curl virus pathogenicity determinant C4 protein. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 71, 25–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Kang, S.; Yang, F.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, J. The Arabidopsis transcription factor BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ETHYL METHANESULFONATE-SUPPRESSOR1 is a direct substrate of MITOGEN-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE6 and regulates immunity. Plant Physiol. 2015, 167, 1076–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Deng, X.G.; Zhu, T.; Peng, X.J.; Xi, D.H.; Guo, H.; Yin, Y.; Zhang, D.W.; Lin, H.H. Role of brassinosteroid signaling in modulating Tobacco mosaic virus resistance in Nicotiana benthamiana. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 20579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hu, Y.; Yu, D. BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE2 Interacts with ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE5 to Mediate the Antagonism of Brassinosteroids to Abscisic Acid during Seed Germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26, tpc-114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cai, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Pan, S.; Dong, R.; Tang, G.; Barajas-Lopez Jde, D.; et al. GSK3-like kinases positively modulate abscisic acid signaling through phosphorylating subgroup III SnRK2s in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 9651–9656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Perez-Perez, J.M.; Ponce, M.R.; Micol, J.L. The ULTRACURVATA2 gene of Arabidopsis encodes an FK506-binding protein involved in auxin and brassinosteroid signaling. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gan, L.; Wu, H.; Wu, D.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, Z.; Yang, N.; Xia, K.; Zhou, X.; Oh, K.; Matsuoka, M.; et al. Zhu, C. Methyl jasmonate inhibits lamina joint inclination by repressing brassinosteroid biosynthesis and signaling in rice. Plant Sci. 2015, 241, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Saidi, Y.; Hearn, T.J.; Coates, J.C. Function and evolution of ‘green’ GSK3/Shaggy-like kinases. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dang, F.F.; Wang, Y.N.; Yu, L.; Eulgem, T.; Lai, Y.; Liu, Z.Q.; Wang, X.; Qiu, A.L.; Zhang, T.X.; Lin, J.; et al. CaWRKY40, a WRKY protein of pepper, plays an important role in the regulation of tolerance to heat stress and resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Plant Cell Environ. 2013, 36, 757–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Kim, D.S.; Jeun, Y.; Hwang, B.K. The pepper patatin-like phospholipase CaPLP1 functions in plant cell death and defense signaling. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 84, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Choi, H.K.; Song, G.C.; Yi, H.S.; Ryu, C.M. Field evaluation of the bacterial volatile derivative 3-pentanol in priming for induced resistance in pepper. J. Chem. Ecol. 2014, 40, 882–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shen, L.; Liu, Z.; Yang, S.; Yang, T.; Liang, J.; Wen, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, L.; Tang, Q.; et al. Pepper CabZIP63 acts as a positive regulator during Ralstonia solanacearum or high temperature-high humidity challenge in a positive feedback loop with CaWRKY40. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2439–2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Shen, L.; Yang, S.; Yang, T.; Liang, J.; Cheng, W.; Wen, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Shi, L.; Tang, Q.; et al. CaCDPK15 positively regulates pepper responses to Ralstonia solanacearum inoculation and forms a positive-feedback loop with CaWRKY40 to amplify defense signaling. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Wang, Y.; Dang, F.; Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Eulgem, T.; Lai, Y.; Yu, L.; She, J.; Shi, Y.; Lin, J.; et al. CaWRKY58, encoding a group I WRKY transcription factor of Capsicum annuum, negatively regulates resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 14, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Ryu, C.M.; Anand, A.; Kang, L.; Mysore, K.S. Agrodrench: A novel and effective agroinoculation method for virus-induced gene silencing in roots and diverse Solanaceous species. Plant J. 2004, 40, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Choi, D.S.; Hwang, I.S.; Hwang, B.K. Requirement of the cytosolic interaction between PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN10 and LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT PROTEIN1 for cell death and defense signaling in pepper. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1675–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Choi, D.S.; Hwang, B.K. Proteomics and functional analyses of pepper abscisic acid-responsive 1 (ABR1), which is involved in cell death and defense signaling. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 823–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, D.S.; Hwang, B.K. The pepper MLO gene, CaMLO2, is involved in the susceptibility cell-death response and bacterial and oomycete proliferation. Plant J. 2012, 72, 843–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sarowar, S.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, E.N.; Kim, K.D.; Hwang, B.K.; Islam, R.; Shin, J.S. Overexpression of a pepper basic pathogenesis-related protein 1 gene in tobacco plants enhances resistance to heavy metal and pathogen stresses. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 24, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Lee, S.C.; Hwang, B.K. Identification of the pepper SAR8.2 gene as a molecular marker for pathogen infection, abiotic elicitors and environmental stresses in Capsicum annuum. Planta 2003, 216, 387–396. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Lee, S.C.; Hwang, B.K. CASAR82A, a pathogen-induced pepper SAR8.2, exhibits an antifungal activity and its overexpression enhances disease resistance and stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 61, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lee, D.J.; Chi, Y.T.; Kim, D.M.; Choi, S.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Choi, G.W. Ectopic expression of CaRLK1 enhances hypoxia tolerance with increasing alanine production in Nicotiana spp. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86, 255–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Iwai, T.; Miyasaka, A.; Seo, S.; Ohashi, Y. Contribution of ethylene biosynthesis for resistance to blast fungus infection in young rice plants. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 1202–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Pontier, D.; Miao, Z.H.; Lam, E. Trans-dominant suppression of plant TGA factors reveals their negative and positive roles in plant defense responses. Plant J. 2001, 27, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Menard, R.; Alban, S.; de Ruffray, P.; Jamois, F.; Franz, G.; Fritig, B.; Yvin, J.C.; Kauffmann, S. Beta-1,3 glucan sulfate, but not beta-1,3 glucan, induces the salicylic acid signaling pathway in tobacco and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 3020–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Sohn, S.I.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, B.R.; Lee, S.Y.; Lim, C.K.; Hur, J.H.; Lee, J.Y. Transgenic tobacco expressing the hrpN(EP) gene from Erwinia pyrifoliae triggers defense responses against botrytis cinerea. Mol. Cells 2007, 24, 232–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Dang, F.; Wang, Y.; She, J.; Lei, Y.; Liu, Z.; Eulgem, T.; Lai, Y.; Lin, J.; Yu, L.; Lei, D.; et al. Overexpression of CaWRKY27, a subgroup IIe WRKY transcription factor of Capsicum annuum, positively regulates tobacco resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Physiol. Plant 2014, 150, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Tian, D.; Traw, M.B.; Chen, J.Q.; Kreitman, M.; Bergelson, J. Fitness costs of R-gene-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2003, 423, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, D.; Amornsiripanitch, N.; Dong, X. A genomic approach to identify regulatory nodes in the transcriptional network of systemic acquired resistance in plants. PLoS Pathog. 2006, 2, e123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Robert-Seilaniantz, A.; Grant, M.; Jones, J.D. Hormone crosstalk in plant disease and defense: More than just jasmonate-salicylate antagonism. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2011, 49, 317–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Pieterse, C.M.; Van der Does, D.; Zamioudis, C.; Leon-Reyes, A.; Van Wees, S.C. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012, 28, 489–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Glazebrook, J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43, 205–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. AbuQamar, S.; Chen, X.; Dhawan, R.; Bluhm, B.; Salmeron, J.; Lam, S.; Dietrich, R.A.; Mengiste, T. Expression profiling and mutant analysis reveals complex regulatory networks involved in Arabidopsis response to Botrytis infection. Plant J. 2006, 48, 28–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Tsuda, K.; Sato, M.; Stoddard, T.; Glazebrook, J.; Katagiri, F. Network properties of robust immunity in plants. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Tsuda, K.; Katagiri, F. Comparing signaling mechanisms engaged in pattern-triggered and effector-triggered immunity. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2010, 13, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Cai, H.; Yang, S.; Yan, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Cheng, J.; Wu, J.; Qiu, A.; Lai, Y.; Mou, S.; Guan, D.; et al. CaWRKY6 transcriptionally activates CaWRKY40, regulates Ralstonia solanacearum resistance, and confers high-temperature and high-humidity tolerance in pepper. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3163–3174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Zhou, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ren, S.; Shen, Y.; Qin, L.; Xing, Y. Genome-Wide Analysis of the Expression of WRKY Family Genes in Different Developmental Stages of Wild Strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Fruit. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jimenez-Gongora, T.; Kim, S.K.; Lozano-Duran, R.; Zipfel, C. Flg22-Triggered Immunity Negatively Regulates Key BR Biosynthetic Genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ding, Y.; Sun, T.; Ao, K.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X. Opposite Roles of Salicylic Acid Receptors NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4 in Transcriptional Regulation of Plant Immunity. Cell 2018, 173, 1454–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Fonseca, S.; Chico, J.M.; Solano, R. The jasmonate pathway: The ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Munroe, D.J.; Loebbert, R.; Bric, E.; Whitton, T.; Prawitt, D.; Vu, D.; Buckler, A.; Winterpacht, A.; Zabel, B.; Housman, D.E. Systematic screening of an arrayed cDNA library by PCR. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 2209–2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Oh, S.K.; Park, J.M.; Joung, Y.H.; Lee, S.; Chung, E.; Kim, S.Y.; Yu, S.H.; Choi, D. A plant EPF-type zinc-finger protein, CaPIF1, involved in defence against pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 269–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Zhang, Q.; Kuang, H.; Chen, C.; Yan, J.; Do-Umehara, H.C.; Liu, X.Y.; Dada, L.; Ridge, K.M.; Chandel, N.S.; Liu, J. The kinase Jnk2 promotes stress-induced mitophagy by targeting the small mitochondrial form of the tumor suppressor ARF for degradation. Nat. Immunol. 2015, 16, 458–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 02698 g001 550
Figure 1. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of CaSK23 in different organs of three-month-old pepper plants. Root transcript levels were used as the reference, which was set as ‘1’. Each value is the average of three replicate experiments ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (Fisher’s protected LSD test; p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis of CaSK23 in different organs of three-month-old pepper plants. Root transcript levels were used as the reference, which was set as ‘1’. Each value is the average of three replicate experiments ± SD. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences (Fisher’s protected LSD test; p < 0.05).
Ijms 19 02698 g001
Ijms 19 02698 g002 550
Figure 2. qRT-PCR analysis of relative CaSK23 transcript levels in pepper plants challenged with Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum) inoculation (RSI) and an exogenous application of phytohormones. (a) Transcription levels of CaSK23 in the RSI pepper plants. Pepper plants were inoculated with 10 μL of the highly virulent R. solanacearum strain FJC100301 suspension (OD600 = 0.8) (using 10 mM MgCl2 as mock treatment) in the lateral vein of the third leaves from the top, and the fourth leaves were harvested at indicated time points for RNA extraction and qPCR. (b–d) Relative transcript levels of CaSK23 in pepper leaves at various time points after spraying with 5 mM salicylic acid, 100 µM methyl jasmonate, and 10 m Methephon or mock. (a–d) Relative transcript levels of CaSK23 in pepper leaves challenged with RSI or exogenously-applied hormones were compared to those in the mock treatments at different time points, which were all set to ‘1’. Experiments were repeated three times with three independent biological repetitions each time. Error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (Fisher’s protected LSD test, * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2. qRT-PCR analysis of relative CaSK23 transcript levels in pepper plants challenged with Ralstonia solanacearum (R. solanacearum) inoculation (RSI) and an exogenous application of phytohormones. (a) Transcription levels of CaSK23 in the RSI pepper plants. Pepper plants were inoculated with 10 μL of the highly virulent R. solanacearum strain FJC100301 suspension (OD600 = 0.8) (using 10 mM MgCl2 as mock treatment) in the lateral vein of the third leaves from the top, and the fourth leaves were harvested at indicated time points for RNA extraction and qPCR. (b–d) Relative transcript levels of CaSK23 in pepper leaves at various time points after spraying with 5 mM salicylic acid, 100 µM methyl jasmonate, and 10 m Methephon or mock. (a–d) Relative transcript levels of CaSK23 in pepper leaves challenged with RSI or exogenously-applied hormones were compared to those in the mock treatments at different time points, which were all set to ‘1’. Experiments were repeated three times with three independent biological repetitions each time. Error bars indicate the standard error. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (Fisher’s protected LSD test, * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01).
Ijms 19 02698 g002
Ijms 19 02698 g003 550
Figure 3. Virus-induced gene silencing of CaSK23 decreased susceptibility of pepper to R. solanacearum. (a) The relative transcriptional expression of CaSK23 in pYL279-CaSK23 pepper plant inoculated with 5.0 mL of R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) by root irrigation at 72 h post inoculation (hpi), compared to that in pYL279 plants. (b) Disease symptoms of CaSK23-silenced and the empty vector control plants inoculated with R. solanacearum by root irrigation at 7 dpi. (c) R. solanacearum growth in the R. solanacearum inoculated third leaves of wild-type and CaSK23 silencing pepper plants at 2 dpi (days post inoculation); (d) CaSK23 silencing significantly increased the expression of immunity-associated marker genes in pepper plants at 72 hpi with R. solanacearum by root irrigation, qne the transcripts of the marker genes were compared to that of mock treated TRV:00 plants, which were set to ‘1’. In (a,c,d), data represent the means ± SD from four biological replicates, and different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (uppercase letter p < 0.01; lowercase letter p < 0.05), determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Figure 3. Virus-induced gene silencing of CaSK23 decreased susceptibility of pepper to R. solanacearum. (a) The relative transcriptional expression of CaSK23 in pYL279-CaSK23 pepper plant inoculated with 5.0 mL of R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) by root irrigation at 72 h post inoculation (hpi), compared to that in pYL279 plants. (b) Disease symptoms of CaSK23-silenced and the empty vector control plants inoculated with R. solanacearum by root irrigation at 7 dpi. (c) R. solanacearum growth in the R. solanacearum inoculated third leaves of wild-type and CaSK23 silencing pepper plants at 2 dpi (days post inoculation); (d) CaSK23 silencing significantly increased the expression of immunity-associated marker genes in pepper plants at 72 hpi with R. solanacearum by root irrigation, qne the transcripts of the marker genes were compared to that of mock treated TRV:00 plants, which were set to ‘1’. In (a,c,d), data represent the means ± SD from four biological replicates, and different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (uppercase letter p < 0.01; lowercase letter p < 0.05), determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Ijms 19 02698 g003
Ijms 19 02698 g004 550
Figure 4. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing CaSK23 displayed increased susceptibility to R. solanacearum inoculation. (a) The transcript abundance of CaSK23 in the transgenic tobacco plants, where NtEF-1α served as the endogenous control; (b) disease symptoms of plants of three eight-week-old transgenic tobacco lines and the wild-type K326 at 7 dpi inoculated with 5.0 mL of R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) by root irrigation; (c) R. solanacearum growth in third leaves of wild-type and CaSK23 overexpressing tobacco plants at 48 hpi (hours post inoculation); (d) relative transcript levels of defense-related genes (NPR1, PR2, PR1b, and EFE26) at indicated time points in transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing CaSK23 without RSI compared to that in the wild-type plants, which were all set to ‘1’; (e) relative transcript levels of defense-related genes in CaSK23-overexpressing transgenic tobacco and wild-type plants at 72 h post inoculation with R. solanacearum, compared to that in mock treated wild-type K326 plants, which were all set to ‘1’. In a, c, d, and e, data represent the means ± SD from four biological replicates, and different uppercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (p < 0.01), determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Figure 4. Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing CaSK23 displayed increased susceptibility to R. solanacearum inoculation. (a) The transcript abundance of CaSK23 in the transgenic tobacco plants, where NtEF-1α served as the endogenous control; (b) disease symptoms of plants of three eight-week-old transgenic tobacco lines and the wild-type K326 at 7 dpi inoculated with 5.0 mL of R. solanacearum suspension (OD600 = 0.8) by root irrigation; (c) R. solanacearum growth in third leaves of wild-type and CaSK23 overexpressing tobacco plants at 48 hpi (hours post inoculation); (d) relative transcript levels of defense-related genes (NPR1, PR2, PR1b, and EFE26) at indicated time points in transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing CaSK23 without RSI compared to that in the wild-type plants, which were all set to ‘1’; (e) relative transcript levels of defense-related genes in CaSK23-overexpressing transgenic tobacco and wild-type plants at 72 h post inoculation with R. solanacearum, compared to that in mock treated wild-type K326 plants, which were all set to ‘1’. In a, c, d, and e, data represent the means ± SD from four biological replicates, and different uppercase letters above the bars indicate significant differences between means (p < 0.01), determined by Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Ijms 19 02698 g004
Ijms 19 02698 g005 550
Figure 5. qRT-PCR analysis of relative expression levels of immunity-associated genes in pepper plants transiently overexpressing CaSK23. Pepper leaves were infiltrated with agrobacterium GV3101 cells carrying the 35S::00 (empty vector) or 35S::CaSK23 construct, and total leaf RNA was isolated at 24 hpi for qRT-PCR analysis. Relative transcript levels of the marker genes in 35S::CaSK23 expressing pepper leaves were compared to those in the 35S::00 control plants, which were all set to ‘1’. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) from three independent biological replicates based on Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Figure 5. qRT-PCR analysis of relative expression levels of immunity-associated genes in pepper plants transiently overexpressing CaSK23. Pepper leaves were infiltrated with agrobacterium GV3101 cells carrying the 35S::00 (empty vector) or 35S::CaSK23 construct, and total leaf RNA was isolated at 24 hpi for qRT-PCR analysis. Relative transcript levels of the marker genes in 35S::CaSK23 expressing pepper leaves were compared to those in the 35S::00 control plants, which were all set to ‘1’. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) from three independent biological replicates based on Fisher’s protected LSD test.
Ijms 19 02698 g005
Ijms 19 02698 g006 550
Figure 6. Hypothetical model for the role of CaSK23 in pepper response to R. solanacearum infection. Upon the challenge of R. solanacearum infection, CaSK23 is transcriptionally downregulated, as CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper immunity partially by blocking SA- and JA-dependent signaling, and the downregulation of CaSK23 releases SA and JA dependent signaling, leading to enhanced immunity against R. solanacearum infection. In SA signaling, the production of SA triggered by pathogens is sensed and bound by receptors such as NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4, in which NPR1 acts positively in plant immunity by interacting with TGAs, while NPR3/NPR4 act negatively by interacting with TGAs in SA dependent immunity [85]. In non-stress challenged plants, immune signaling mediated by the MYC transcription factor is depressed via its interaction with JAZs. When plants are attacked by a pathogen or herbivore, JA is produced, which conjugates with amino acids by JAR1, resulting in enhanced (+)-7-iso-JA–Ile levels. The increased (+)-7-iso-JA–Ile favours the formation of JAZ–COI1 complexes, leading to the ubiquitination and degradation of JAZ by the 26S proteasome, thus MYC2 is released to activate transcription [86]. T-bar mean repression. Solid lines represent clear pathways, but dotted lines are that not clear.
Figure 6. Hypothetical model for the role of CaSK23 in pepper response to R. solanacearum infection. Upon the challenge of R. solanacearum infection, CaSK23 is transcriptionally downregulated, as CaSK23 acts as a negative regulator in pepper immunity partially by blocking SA- and JA-dependent signaling, and the downregulation of CaSK23 releases SA and JA dependent signaling, leading to enhanced immunity against R. solanacearum infection. In SA signaling, the production of SA triggered by pathogens is sensed and bound by receptors such as NPR1 and NPR3/NPR4, in which NPR1 acts positively in plant immunity by interacting with TGAs, while NPR3/NPR4 act negatively by interacting with TGAs in SA dependent immunity [85]. In non-stress challenged plants, immune signaling mediated by the MYC transcription factor is depressed via its interaction with JAZs. When plants are attacked by a pathogen or herbivore, JA is produced, which conjugates with amino acids by JAR1, resulting in enhanced (+)-7-iso-JA–Ile levels. The increased (+)-7-iso-JA–Ile favours the formation of JAZ–COI1 complexes, leading to the ubiquitination and degradation of JAZ by the 26S proteasome, thus MYC2 is released to activate transcription [86]. T-bar mean repression. Solid lines represent clear pathways, but dotted lines are that not clear.
Ijms 19 02698 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiu, A.; Wu, J.; Lei, Y.; Cai, Y.; Wang, S.; Liu, Z.; Guan, D.; He, S. CaSK23, a Putative GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase of Capsicum annuum, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Pepper’s Response to Ralstonia solanacearum Attack. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092698

AMA Style

Qiu A, Wu J, Lei Y, Cai Y, Wang S, Liu Z, Guan D, He S. CaSK23, a Putative GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase of Capsicum annuum, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Pepper’s Response to Ralstonia solanacearum Attack. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(9):2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092698

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiu, Ailian, Ji Wu, Yufen Lei, Yiting Cai, Song Wang, Zhiqin Liu, Deyi Guan, and Shuilin He. 2018. "CaSK23, a Putative GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase of Capsicum annuum, Acts as a Negative Regulator of Pepper’s Response to Ralstonia solanacearum Attack" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9: 2698. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092698

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop