Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Model of Neuroinflammation: Efficacy of Cannabigerol, a Non-Psychoactive Cannabinoid
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Gold Nanoparticle to Plasmonic Biosensors
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Cloning and Expression Analysis of Lactate Dehydrogenase from the Oriental River Prawn Macrobrachium nipponense in Response to Hypoxia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gold Nanoparticles in Diagnostics and Therapeutics for Human Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms19071991
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Gold Nanoparticles: A Powerful Tool to Visualize Proteins on Ordered Mesoporous Silica and for the Realization of Theranostic Nanobioconjugates

by
Marco Piludu
1,*,
Luca Medda
2,
Maura Monduzzi
3 and
Andrea Salis
3,*
1
Department of Biomedical Science, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA 09042, Italy
2
Department of Chemistry, CSGI, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, FI 50019, Italy
3
Department of Chemical and Geological Sciences, CSGI, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, CA 90042, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(7), 1991; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071991
Submission received: 21 June 2018 / Revised: 2 July 2018 / Accepted: 5 July 2018 / Published: 8 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Translating Gold Nanoparticles to Diagnostics and Therapeutics)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) is a very interesting nanostructured material for the design and engineering of new target and controlled drug-delivery systems. Particularly relevant is the interaction between OMS and proteins. Large pores (6–9 nm) micrometric particles can be used for the realization of a drug depot system where therapeutic proteins are adsorbed either inside the mesopores or on the external surface. Small pores (1–2 nm) mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), can be injected in the blood stream. In the latter case, therapeutic proteins are mainly adsorbed on the MSNs’ external surface. Whenever a protein-OMS conjugate is prepared, a diagnostic method to locate the protein either on the internal or the external silica surface is of utmost importance. To visualize the fine localization of proteins adsorbed in mesoporous silica micro- and nanoparticles, we have employed specific transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analytical strategies based on the use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) conjugates. GNPs are gaining in popularity, representing a fundamental tool to design future applications of MSNs in nanomedicine by realizing theranostic nanobioconjugates. It may be pointed out that we are at the very beginning of a new age of the nanomaterial science: the “mesoporous golden age”.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction: Ordered Mesoporous Silica (OMS) Materials in Nanomedicine

1.1. The Beginning

As long ago as 1990, when they were discovered [1], ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) materials drew the attention of most material scientists and engineers. Due to their singular structural properties [2], OMSs have been intensely studied in recent years for the design of new biomaterials. They are mainly characterized by ordered channels and cavities with uniform pores (2–50 nm) [3] (Figure 1). The high surface area makes these materials suitable for new and innovative applications. OMSs have largely been investigated for catalysis [4] and biocatalysis purposes [5,6] and have shown potential features to be employed in nanomedicine [3,7,8,9]. As a result of the development of strategic synthesis procedures OMS structural features can be modified and fitted to specific aims, extending enormously their range of applications.
Their capacity to house into the pore channels specific therapeutic molecules have paved the way for the developing of innovative applications of mesoporous silica as drug delivery systems [3,11,12,13,14,15]. OMS can be chemically modified to load and release specific therapeutic molecules according to controlled conditions [16,17]. Biomedical application of OMS is largely associated to their fate in biological media which, in turn, is related to their surface properties. Surface functionalization (Figure 2) plays a key role in determining biodegradation, cytotoxicity, and biodistribution through interactions which may be mediated by the macromolecules occurring in biological media [18,19,20].
Important steps toward the development of targeted drug depot systems are the understanding of the mechanisms that regulate cell interaction of functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). Previous works have investigated by means of light microscopy the cellular uptake of MSNs in vitro. The strategy was to attach fluorescent dye molecules to the MSNs surface to visualize and locate the particles inside the cellular compartment [18,21,22,23,24,25]. Additional analyses through electron microscopy have highlighted, at ultrastructural level, the main morphological events that take place during cellular MSN internalization [18,25]. It was shown that cellular uptake of MSNs is strictly linked to the surface charge [25,26]. In this context, proteins have been indicated to be the right candidates to tailor the OMS behavior in a given biological system. For instance, surface protein functionalization of MSNs improves their biocompatibility when injected in biological media [27,28]. Moreover, the interaction between MSN and cellular surface can easily be modulated and controlled through specific protein functionalization [29] (Figure 3). Serum proteins, antibodies represent some of the wide variety of proteins that can be used to tailor chemical properties of MSNs in order to increase their biocompatibility or to set controlled release toward targeted tissues [30,31]. Particularly the adsorption of specific peptides and proteins characterized by important biological functions, represents key factors in the design and engineering of new nanosized drug-delivery systems. Moreover, it is well known that antibodies are biomacromolecules produced by immune system that are able to recognize a large variety of pathogens such as virus and bacteria [32] or to interact with cancer cells [33,34] through specific binding. In recent years, several therapeutic applications of the antibodies have been developed for the cure of autoimmune disorders or for the treatment of cancer disease [32].

1.2. The Golden Age

Several physico-chemical techniques, such as N2-adsorption isotherms and thermogravmetric analysis (TGA), provide important information on protein loading on OMS, but cannot directly visualize proteins adsorbed on the OMS’ surfaces. Different analytical methods are needed to deeply investigate the interaction of proteins with OMS and to elucidate the cellular interaction mechanisms of protein-MSN conjugates.
The strategic use of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) with dimension smaller than 100 nm has opened the way to the development of new and intriguing analytical procedures. The unique properties of GNPs make them suitable for biodiagnostic and bioanalitycal assays so that in the last years have received great attention as biosensors [35,36,37]. As a matter of fact, GNPs can be identified through different methodologies using their light absorption and scattering properties [38]. Because of their electron density properties GNPs are extremely suitable for labelling and can easily be revealed by electron microscopy techniques. Moreover, due to their peculiar surface chemistry they can be bound to a large variety of molecules, proteins included. All these features, added together, provide a formidable investigative tool to permit qualitative and quantitative analyses of protein location, and distribution at the ultrastructural level. Additionally, due to their optical features, they have been suggested for specific purposes that go beyond the imaging methodologies. Indeed, GNPs are good candidates for the development of theranostic nanobioconjugates to be used in medicine therapy [39]. It is well known that gold nanoparticles can be heated when exposed to light source. Photothermal therapy based on the use of the GNPs has already been tested in specifically targeted GNPs that can be used to destroy selectively malignant cancer cells, following laser exposure [40,41].
In this review, we aim to describe the principal innovative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analytical strategies, based on the use of nanogold conjugates, to monitor proteins adsorbed on OMS. This topic is related to the exploitation of GNPs’ potentiality in different nanomedicine applications, spanning from controlled drug delivery depots to diagnostic and theranostic purposes (Scheme 1). This is just the tip of the iceberg.

2. “Seeing Is Believing”: Immunogold Labelling Methods to Monitor Proteins

2.1. Protein Localization in Animal Cells and Tissues: The Case of Histatin

Since their development immunogold staining (IGS) techniques became the elective procedures for macromolecules’ detection in animal cells and tissues. IGS techniques represent a fundamental tool in ultrastructural biological assays aimed to describe protein fine localization in animal tissues. IGS procedures were first developed by Faulk and Taylor in 1971 [42] to meet suitable protein analytical requirements during ultrastructural morphological investigations in animal tissues. They were able, for the first time, to improve the standard routinely TEM studies adding details at the molecular level about protein location and distribution. Before that, TEM methodologies were generally based on pure morphological analysis of biological samples. Shape, size, and number of subcellular organelles were the main data accessible following TEM examination. Since then, IGS techniques have extensively been used to localize proteins in animal tissues and revolutionized the way to investigate at ultrastructure level where morphological details were unequivocally combined to a significant amount of chemical data. The advantage of this methodology is the aptitude of gold-conjugated antibodies to recognize and bind specifically proteins, thus providing evidences about protein content and distribution. Colloidal gold, as electron dense marker, represents the best candidate probe to visualize and locate, by means of TEM, proteins exploiting the highly specific binding of antibody-GNP conjugates. GNPs provide an unequivocal signal that can easily be distinguished in both biological and inorganic samples.
IGS was used by Piludu and coworkers to locate the presence and distribution of specific proteins in several animal tissues [43,44,45,46]. The purpose of these investigations was to provide additional data concerning the secretion process of different antimicrobial peptides (AMP) in human salivary glands. To date, the AMP have been well characterized during the last 20 years, however only a few data were reported about their localization and secretion in human tissues. The IGS procedures permitted, for the first time, to localize and to study the distribution of several AMP in human tissues and to definitely establish the involvement of the different human salivary glands in their production and secretion. In particular, the electron microscopic immunogold labelling extended enormously the previous biochemical investigations highlighting the fine visualization of AMP at the subcellular level (Figure 4).

2.2. Proteins Adsorbed on Ordered Mesoporous Silica Materials: The Case of Lysozyme

Although immunogold procedures were initially developed for biological assays, IGS was then employed for the functionalization of OMS materials to develop smart nanodevices for biomedicine applications. As previously stated, OMS materials have peculiar structural features that make them suitable hosts to immobilize into their pores a large variety of macromolecules with important biological functions [16]. Among the OMS materials, SBA-15 has largely been studied as a potential carrier for different purposes. Previous investigations studied the interaction and adsorption mechanisms of several therapeutic molecules onto SBA-15 [3,47,48]. These studies pointed out the potentiality for obtaining smart delivery systems. Interestingly, specific chemical surface functionalization of SBA-15 was shown to enable peculiar biocompatibility conditions [10,18,49].
In order to gain direct visualization of proteins adsorbed onto SBA-15 materials, we used for the first time the IGS techniques in our investigations [50]. We studied the location and distribution of the human lysozyme adsorbed onto mesoporous silica SBA-15 particles using a post embedding immunogold staining procedure. The advantage of this method is due to the high resolution of the gold labelling, and its unambiguous electron dense mark that can simply be evidenced by transmission electron microscopy. Human lysozyme loaded and unloaded SBA-15 microparticles (around 300 nm) were embedded in LR gold resin blocks. After resin polymerization, the embedded samples were cut into ultrathin sections (90 nm thick), and then processed for immunogold staining through two consecutive incubation steps of the sections with specific antibodies. The first step of this procedure was characterized by the interaction of a primary antibody, specific to human lysozyme, whereas in the following step a gold-conjugated secondary antibody, specific to primary antibody, was added. TEM analysis highlighted the presence of specific lysozyme reactivity that was visualized as definite black spots into cylindrical channels or located on the surface of SBA-15 particles (Figure 5).
The selection of an appropriate antibody in immunolocalization assays is extremely crucial to gain reliable results, in particular, considering that choices have to be made on the basis of availability, quality of antibodies and specificity towards a given protein. The achievement of significant results in immunolocalization investigations deals with the aptitude of the primary antibody to bind specifically proteins through an important biochemical interaction that leads to the formation of the antibody-antigen complex [51]. The present method, being characterized by the sequential binding of primary, and secondary antibodies, is generally known as indirect method. Indeed, the gold marker is associated to the primary antibody-antigen complex through linking the secondary antibodies (Figure 6).
In order to meet peculiar needs of immunochemical assays different IGS procedures can be used. Remarkably, the indirect method in the recent years has gained in popularity compared to the direct IGS procedure that is based on the GNPs directly bound to the primary antibodies. The reason for that may be found in the higher sensitivity of the indirect method as a result of the capacity of secondary antibodies to interact with multiple epitopes located on primary antibodies [51,52]. Because of the sequential steps of incubations with primary and secondary antibodies, it should be noticed that indirect methods may imply the concurrence of cross-reactions with unrelated molecules [51]. It follows that suitable and appropriate control samples are of utmost importance. In our investigation we performed specific controls in order to verify the specificity of lysozyme labelling in loaded SBA-15. Indeed, the failure of antibody performance may occur at any stage of the procedure. During our investigations unloaded samples of SBA-15 were incubated with both primary and secondary antibodies to ascertain antibody specificity. Moreover, additional controls were performed by incubating human lysozyme loaded samples with non-immune serum or with the secondary antibody only and omitting the primary antibody (negative control). No gold labelling was detected in any of these cases [50].
Peculiar modifications of the standard IGS protocol regards the use of multiple sequential staining procedure of two or more proteins in the same sample, using different size gold conjugated antibodies. One of the main advantages of the double immunostaining procedure concerns the opportunity to study simultaneously several proteins adsorbed in the same material. Choosing different gold nanosized conjugated secondary antibodies specific for the primary antibodies allows to monitor the different proteins separately. This technique, successfully applied in several histochemical studies, involves the use of different size nanogold conjugated antibodies that can easily be distinguished during TEM analysis, thus allowing to visualize spatial relationships of two or more proteins in the same section.

2.3. Silver Enhancement Technique and Ultra-Small Gold Nanoparticles: The Case of an Antibody Fragment

Small GNPs (gold size ≈ 1–3 nm) were firstly introduced in order to improve the penetration of gold conjugated antibodies into animal cells and tissues and to enhance labelling efficacy [53,54]. In pre-embedding immunocytochemical assays gold conjugated antibody efficiency deals with the size of gold particles used. It was shown that the antibodies employed in routinely IGS procedures with gold size particles around 10–30 nm show reduced interaction efficiency. Instead, smaller nanoparticles were shown to be characterized by a higher degree of penetration, improved gold conjugated antibody interaction with the targeted antigens and higher resolution of labelling [54,55]. Because of their properties ultra-small GNPs may be used in high resolution labelling for protein detection in nanostructured materials and in the development of targeted drug delivery systems. However, the ultra-small GNPs cannot be visualized by conventional TEM but need to be amplified and converted in larger size particles through silver enhancement procedure [56].
Similarly, we used the silver enhancement procedure to visualize the antibody fragments F(ab’)GAMIgG conjugated to ultra-small gold nanoparticles (GNPs diameter 0.8 nm) immobilized into the mesopores of amino functionalized SBA-15 particles [57]. The silver-enhanced GNPs resulted visible at conventional TEM, thus allowing for an unequivocal imaging of the location of the antibody fragment-GNPs conjugates inside the channels of SBA-15 particles (Figure 7).
The use of sub-nanometer gold increased enormously its diffusion and penetration efficiency due to the reduced overall size and decreased steric hindrance. This procedure was carried out by embedding both F(ab’)GAMIgG-GNPs loaded and unloaded SBA-15 micro-particles in resin, following standard preparation procedure [58] and finally cutting ultrathin sections (70–90 nm thick) of both embedded samples with ultramicrotome. The ultrathin sections were finally treated through the silver enhancement procedure. In detail, the silver enhancement technique permitted the amplification of the ultra-small GNPs that acted as nucleation sites for the deposition of Ag atoms obtained through the reduction of Ag+ ions in all loaded samples of SBA-15. The unloaded samples used as controls were devoid of labelling. The TEM observation revealed the presence of unequivocal silver labelling as 20–30 nm size black dots on the mesoporous inner structure. The black dots highlighted the presence and distribution of antibody fragments F(ab’)GAMIgG either inside the pores or adsorbed on the surface of SBA-15 microparticles (Figure 8).
On the basis of these results, it should be remarked the importance of this powerful procedure to study and gain site-specific data concerning the functionalization process of specific peptides and proteins in OMS materials, and thus in the engineering of new drug delivery systems. Moreover, the use of ultra-small gold particles represents the best choice for molecular labelling, since it does not seem to prevent the penetration of the proteins into the pore channels of SBA-15, considering that the silver labelling is highly specific and highly sensitive towards the gold particles [59].

3. Exploring the Formation Mechanism of the Protein Corona: The Case of BSA-GNP Conjugates

Gold nanoparticles can be bound directly to a large variety of biomolecules by using definite chemical methodologies. For instance, hydrophobic interactions or charge pairing represent the main procedures employed to conjugate GNPs to specific molecules. During our investigations we used gold complexes to study the adsorption process of biomolecules on the surface of functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) dispersed in biological media. In detail, we investigated the interaction of gold conjugated bovine serum albumin (BSA) with hyaluronic acid (HA) and chitosan (CHIT) functionalized MSNs to provide new insights on the molecular mechanisms that lead to the formation of the surface layer of biomolecules around the MSN, known as the “protein corona” [10]. Protein corona induces significant changes in the physico-chemical properties of MSNs surface. This in turn may affect MSNs cellular interaction and uptake. Protein corona formation is influenced by both chemical MSNs features and composition of the biological fluids. It has been reported that functionalized MSNs, when injected in biological media, are characterized by the interaction of their surface with the dispersed biomolecules. This process is supposed to be initiated by specific physico-chemical interactions that rely mainly on the peculiar MSNs features such as surface charge [60,61]. To this purpose, the behavior of BSA interaction with the differently functionalized MSNs was investigated by conventional TEM analysis. We used BSA conjugated with gold nanoparticles (BSA-GNPs). Evident gold labelling was observed on the surface of both MSN-HA and MSN-CHIT samples, that were characterized by similar BSA-GNPs patterns. Occasionally, higher gold labelling intensity was found in MSN-CHIT than in MSN-HA, pointing out that BSA interaction depends on the molecular features of the biopolymers adsorbed on MSN surface (Figure 9).
Here, it should be remarked that, at a pH around 7, BSA carries a negative charge (being pI ≈ 4.7), whereas MSN-CHIT and MSN-HA surfaces are positively and negatively charged, respectively. Indeed, protein adsorption is mainly addressed by electrostatic interactions according to the order MSN-CHIT > MSN-HA; however, the relevant BSA adsorption on the negatively charged MSN-HA implies important contributions of van der Waals attractive interactions, as demonstrated by zeta potential data (see Table 2 in [10]). A similar trend was also observed after the gold labelling procedure. The GNP conjugation provided a powerful methodology for the direct visualization of interaction process of BSA with functionalized MSN surfaces, correlating surface characterization of MSNs with BSA adsorption. In other words, the formation of a protein corona around functionalized MSN particles, independently of the electrostatic forces, was unequivocally proven [10].

4. Toward the Realization of Theranostic Nanobioconjugates

In the previous paragraphs we have described the use of GNPs as diagnostic devices for the localization of proteins within the internal and the external surface of OMS. Besides diagnostic imaging, GNPs may find different application in nanomedicine. GNPs are indeed characterized by a surface plasmon frequency in the visible range, which makes them suitable for therapeutic treatments (i.e., photothermal therapy [62] or, more interestingly, for “theranostics” that is the combination between therapy and diagnostics [63]. In a very recent work [64], we assembled multicomponent nano-bioconjugates based on mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs), proteins (BSA or lysozyme), and gold nanoparticles (Figure 10). The purpose of the realization of such nano-bioconjugates was for a possible application in nanomedicine as theranostic devices. Indeed, MSNs can act as drug carriers, proteins stabilize MSNs within the bloodstream, or may have therapeutic or targeting functions. Finally, GNPs could either be used as contrast agents for imaging or for photothermal therapy. The synthesized MSNs, functionalized with amino-terminated groups (MSN-NH2), were conjugated to BSA or lysozyme on the external surface of MSN-NH2 to obtain MSN-BSA and MSN-Lysozyme bioconjugates, respectively. The MSN-protein samples were dispersed in a GNP solution to obtain MSN-protein-GNPs nano-bioconjugates. TEM analysis showed the occurrence of GNPs on the MSN-protein surface. Interestingly, we demonstrated, through fluorescence and Raman measurements, that GNP-protein specific interaction occurs through the involvement of tryptophan amino acid residues. Hence, the MSN-protein-GNPs nano-bioconjugates formed in the presence of lysozyme display more conjugated GNPs than those formed in the presence of BSA: This was related to the higher number of tryptophan residues in lysozyme compared to BSA.

5. Conclusions

The use of GNPs represents one of the most encouraging strategies to monitor proteins in many research fields. They have been suggested as biosensors because of their optical properties and are excellent labels that can be detected through several procedures. GNPs can be conjugated with a large variety of biomolecules. Because of their comparable size with proteins, peptides, oligonucleotides, and other biomolecules, GNPs can be used in many biomedical application fields. They can be used as drug carriers to deliver specific therapeutic molecules as a result of their ability to link and load different molecules such as peptides, proteins, or oligonucleotides [65,66,67]. The GNPs, when conjugated to specific targeting proteins, can also be used as intrinsic drug agents. Their capacity to penetrate cellular compartments and induce cellular damage by cellular oxidative stress, or by photothermal therapy has been used to ablate specifically cancer cells and tissues. However, even though their use as contrast agents remains the main application in imaging and diagnostic medicine, it should be remarked that GNPs based approaches are becoming a fundamental tool in the development of new theranostic nanobioconjugates. The main aim of this review was to bring the attention of the readers to the extraordinary high resolving power of the gold labelling techniques, building a bridge with the other investigative physical and chemical disciplines. This may provide new eyes to the way how we look at the nanostructured world of the ordered mesoporous silica materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P., L.M., M.M., and A.S.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.P.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.P., L.M., M.M., and A.S.

Funding

This research was funded by FIR 2017-2018, Fondazione di Sardegna/Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (CUP F72F16003070002). AS thanks FFABR 2017 (MIUR).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

OMSOrdered mesoporous silica
MSNMesoporous silica nanoparticle
GNPGold nanoparticles
IGSImmunogold staining
AMPAntimicrobial peptides
BSABovine serum albumin
HAHyaluronic acid
CHITChitosan

References

  1. Kresge, C.T.; Leonowicz, M.E.; Roth, W.J.; Vartuli, J.C.; Beck, J.S. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 1992, 359, 710–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davis, M.E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 2002, 417, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bhattacharyya, M.S.; Hiwale, P.; Piras, M.; Medda, L.; Steri, D.; Piludu, M.; Salis, A.; Monduzzi, M. Lysozyme Adsorption and Release from Ordered Mesoporous Materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 19928–19934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Taguchi, A.; Schüth, F. Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005, 77, 1–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Salis, A.; Casula, M.F.; Bhattacharyya, M.S.; Pinna, M.; Solinas, V.; Monduzzi, M. Physical and Chemical Lipase Adsorption on SBA-15: Effect of Different Interactions on Enzyme Loading and Catalytic Performance. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pitzalis, F.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. A bienzymatic biocatalyst constituted by glucose oxidase and Horseradish peroxidase immobilized on ordered mesoporous silica. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2017, 241, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vallet-Regí, M.; Doadrio, J.C.; Doadrio, A.L.; Izquierdo-Barba, I.; Pérez-Pariente, J. Hexagonal ordered mesoporous material as a matrix for the controlled release of amoxicillin. Solid State Ion. 2004, 172, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vallet-Regi, M.; Rámila, A.; Del Real, R.P.; Pérez-Pariente, J. A new property of MCM-41: Drug delivery system. Chem. Mater. 2001, 13, 308–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gómez-Cerezo, N.; Izquierdo-Barba, I.; Arcos, D.; Vallet-Regí, M. Tailoring the biological response of mesoporous bioactive materials. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3810–3819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nairi, V.; Medda, S.; Piludu, M.; Casula, M.F.; Vallet-Regì, M.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Interactions between bovine serum albumin and mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with biopolymers. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 340, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castillo, R.R.; Baeza, A.; Vallet-Regí, M. Recent applications of the combination of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with nucleic acids: Development of bioresponsive devices, carriers and sensors. Biomater. Sci. 2017, 5, 353–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Castillo, R.R.; Colilla, M.; Vallet-Regí, M. Advances in mesoporous silica-based nanocarriers for co-delivery and combination therapy against cancer. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2017, 14, 229–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tang, F.; Li, L.; Chen, D. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Biocompatibility and Drug Delivery. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1504–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, S.-H.; Hung, Y.; Mou, C.-Y. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as nanocarriers. Chem. Commun. (Camb.) 2011, 47, 9972–9985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Paris, J.L.; Cabanas, M.V.; Manzano, M.; Vallet-Regí, M. Polymer-Grafted Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Ultrasound-Responsive Drug Carriers. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 11023–11033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Nairi, V.; Medda, L.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Adsorption and release of ampicillin antibiotic from ordered mesoporous silica. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 497, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sevimli, F.; Yilmaz, A. Surface functionalization of SBA-15 particles for amoxicillin delivery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 158, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Salis, A.; Fanti, M.; Medda, L.; Nairi, V.; Cugia, F.; Piludu, M.; Sogos, V.; Monduzzi, M. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Functionalized with Hyaluronic Acid and Chitosan Biopolymers. Effect of Functionalization on Cell Internalization. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 741–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Popat, A.; Liu, J.; Lu, G.Q.; Qiao, S.Z. A pH-responsive drug delivery system based on chitosan coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 11173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, W.T.; Yang, Y.; Shen, P.H.; Gao, X.J.; He, S.Q.; Liu, H.; Zhu, C.S. Facile and simple preparation of pH-sensitive chitosan-mesoporous silica nanoparticles for future breast cancer treatment. Express Polym. Lett. 2015, 9, 1068–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, D.-M.; Chung, T.-H.; Hung, Y.; Lu, F.; Wu, S.-H.; Mou, C.-Y.; Yao, M.; Chen, Y.-C. Internalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles induces transient but not sufficient osteogenic signals in human mesenchymal stem cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 231, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xia, Y.; Li, M.; Peng, T.; Zhang, W.; Xiong, J.; Hu, Q.; Song, Z.; Zheng, Q. In vitro cytotoxicity of fluorescent silica nanoparticles hybridized with aggregation-induced emission luminogens for living cell imaging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 1080–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Guo, H.; Qian, H.; Sun, S.; Sun, D.; Yin, H.; Cai, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J.; Jiang, T.; Liu, X. Hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for intracellular delivery of fluorescent dye. Chem. Cent. J. 2011, 5, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zhang, J.; Postovit, L.M.; Wang, D.; Gardiner, R.B.; Harris, R.; Abdul, M.M.; Thomas, A.A. In situ loading of basic fibroblast growth factor within porous silica nanoparticles for a prolonged release. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2009, 4, 1297–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nairi, V.; Magnolia, S.; Piludu, M.; Nieddu, M.; Caria, C.A.; Sogos, V.; Vallet-Regì, M.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles functionalized with hyaluronic acid. Effect of the biopolymer chain length on cell internalization. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces 2018, 168, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nel, A.E.; Mädler, L.; Velegol, D.; Xia, T.; Hoek, E.M.V.; Somasundaran, P.; Klaessig, F.; Castranova, V.; Thompson, M. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fang, W.; Wang, Z.; Zong, S.; Chen, H.; Zhu, D.; Zhong, Y.; Cui, Y. PH-controllable drug carrier with SERS activity for targeting cancer cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 57, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ferris, D.P.; Lu, J.; Gothard, C.; Yanes, R.; Thomas, C.R.; Olsen, J.C.; Stoddart, J.F.; Tamanoi, F.; Zink, J.I. Synthesis of biomolecule-modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted hydrophobic drug delivery to cancer cells. Small 2011, 7, 1816–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cheng, K.; Blumen, S.R.; MacPherson, M.B.; Steinbacher, J.L.; Mossman, B.T.; Landry, C.C. Enhanced Uptake of Porous Silica Microparticles by Bifunctional Surface Modification with a Targeting Antibody and a Biocompatible Polymer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2010, 2, 2489–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Li, Z.-Y.; Hu, J.-J.; Xu, Q.; Chen, S.; Jia, H.-Z.; Sun, Y.-X.; Zhuo, R.-X.; Zhang, X.-Z. A redox-responsive drug delivery system based on RGD containing peptide-capped mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, J.; Yuan, Z.F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, W.H.; Luo, G.F.; Cheng, S.X.; Zhuo, R.X.; Zhang, X.Z. Multifunctional envelope-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor-triggered targeting drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5068–5073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chan, A.C.; Carter, P.J. Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Carter, P. Improving the efficacy of antibody-based cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2001, 1, 118–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Weiner, L.M.; Surana, R.; Wang, S. Monoclonal antibodies: Versatile platforms for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2010, 10, 217–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Pingarrón, J.M.; Yáñez-Sedeño, P.; González-Cortés, A. Gold nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors. Electrochim. Acta 2008, 53, 5848–5866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Schluesener, H.J.; Xu, S. Gold nanoparticle-based biosensors. Gold Bull. 2010, 43, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Howes, P.D.; Chandrawati, R.; Stevens, M.M. Colloidal nanoparticles as advanced biological sensors. Science 2014, 346, 1247390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold nanoparticles: Optical properties and implementations in cancer diagnosis and photothermal therapy. J. Adv. Res. 2010, 1, 13–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brown, S.D.; Nativo, P.; Smith, J.-A.; Stirling, D.; Edwards, P.R.; Venugopal, B.; Flint, D.J.; Plumb, J.A.; Graham, D.; Wheate, N.J. Gold Nanoparticles for the Improved Anticancer Drug Delivery of the Active Component of Oxaliplatin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 4678–4684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sean Norman, R.; Stone, J.W.; Gole, A.; Murphy, C.J.; Sabo-Attwood, T.L. Targeted photothermal lysis of the pathogenic bacteria, pseudomonas aeruginosa, with gold nanorods. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Dickerson, E.B.; Dreaden, E.C.; Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Chu, H.; Pushpanketh, S.; McDonald, J.F.; El-Sayed, M.A. Gold nanorod assisted near-infrared plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) of squamous cell carcinoma in mice. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Faulk, W.P.; Taylor, G.M. Immunocolloid method for the electron microscope. Immunochemistry 1971, 8, 1081–1083. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Piludu, M.; Lantini, M.S.; Cossu, M.; Piras, M.; Oppenheim, F.G.; Helmerhorst, E.J.; Siqueira, W.; Hand, A.R. Salivary histatins in human deep posterior lingual glands (of von Ebner). Arch. Oral Biol. 2006, 51, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piras, M.; Hand, A.R.; Piludu, M. Electron microscopic immunogold localization of salivary mucin MUC5B in human buccal and palatal glands. Acta Histochem. 2011, 113, 844–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Piludu, M.; Piras, M.; Pichiri, G.; Coni, P.; Orrù, G.; Cabras, T.; Messana, I.; Faa, G.; Castagnola, M. Thymosin beta 4 may translocate from the cytoplasm in to the nucleus in HepG2 cells following serum starvation. An ultrastructural study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Piras, M.; Tandler, B.; Tomassini Barbarossa, I.; Piludu, M. Immunogold labeling of carbonic anhydrase isozyme (CA-VI) in secretory granules of human parotid glands. Acta Histochem. 2012, 114, 406–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Song, S.W.; Hidajat, K.; Kawi, S. Functionalized SBA-15 materials as carriers for controlled drug delivery: Influence of surface properties on matrix-drug interactions. Langmuir 2005, 21, 9568–9575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Yu, H.; Zhai, Q.Z. Mesoporous SBA-15 molecular sieve as a carrier for controlled release of nimodipine. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2009, 123, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Medda, L.; Casula, M.F.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Adsorption of lysozyme on hyaluronic acid functionalized SBA-15 mesoporous silica: A possible bioadhesive depot system. Langmuir 2014, 30, 12996–13004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Piras, M.; Salis, A.; Piludu, M.; Steri, D.; Monduzzi, M. 3D vision of human lysozyme adsorbed onto a SBA-15 nanostructured matrix. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Murtey, M.D. Immunogold Techniques in Electron Microscopy. In Modern Electron Microscopy in Physical and Life Sciences; InTech: London, UK, 2016; pp. 143–160. ISBN 978-953-51-2252-4. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bunea, M. New current Aspects on the Immunohistochemical Techniques. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2001, 6, 177–209. [Google Scholar]
  53. Baschong, W.; Wrigley, N.G. Small colloidal gold conjugated to fab fragments or to immunoglobulin g as highresolution labels for electron microscopy: A technical overview. J. Electron Microsc. Tech. 1990, 14, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Vandré, D.D.; Burry, R.W. Immunoelectron microscopic localization of phosphoproteins associated with the mitotic spindle. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1992, 40, 1837–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Takizawa, T.; Robinson, J.M. Use of 1.4-nm immunogold particles for immunocytochemistry on ultra-thin cryosections. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1994, 42, 1615–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Holgate, C.S.; Jackson, P.; Cowen, P.N.; Bird, C.C. Immunogold-silver staining: New method of immunostaining with enhanced sensitivity. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1983, 31, 938–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Piludu, M.; Medda, L.; Cugia, F.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Silver Enhancement for Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging of Antibody Fragment-Gold Nanoparticles Conjugates Immobilized on Ordered Mesoporous Silica. Langmuir 2015, 31, 9458–9463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Thorpe, J.R. The application of LR gold resin for immunogold labeling. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 117, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Lah, J.J.; Hayes, D.M.; Burry, R.W. A neutral pH silver development method for the visualization of 1-nanometer gold particles in pre-embedding electron microscopic immunocytochemistry. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1990, 38, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Aggarwal, P.; Hall, J.B.; McLeland, C.B.; Dobrovolskaia, M.A.; McNeil, S.E. Nanoparticle interaction with plasma proteins as it relates to particle biodistribution, biocompatibility and therapeutic efficacy. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2009, 61, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Lynch, I.; Dawson, K.A. Protein-nanoparticle interactions. Nano Today 2008, 3, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M.A. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Xie, J.; Lee, S.; Chen, X. Nanoparticle-based theranostic agents. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2010, 62, 1064–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Delpiano, G.R.; Casula, M.F.; Piludu, M.; Corpino, R.; Ricci, P.C.; Vallet-Regí, M.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Assembly of Multicomponent Nano-bioconjugates Composed of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles, Proteins and Gold Nanoparticles. Submitted Manuscript. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  65. Rosi, N.L.; Giljohann, D.A.; Thaxton, C.S.; Lytton-Jean, A.K.R.; Han, M.S.; Mirkin, C.A. Oligonucleotide-modified gold nanoparticles for infracellular gene regulation. Science 2006, 312, 1027–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cheng, Y.; Samia, A.C.; Li, J.; Kenney, M.E.; Resnick, A.; Burda, C. Delivery and efficacy of a cancer drug as a function of the bond to the gold nanoparticle surface. Langmuir 2010, 26, 2248–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Giljohann, D.A.; Seferos, D.S.; Prigodich, A.E.; Patel, P.C.; Mirkin, C.A. Gene regulation with polyvalent siRNA-nanoparticle conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 2072–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01991 g001 550
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) nanoparticles. (a) Original SBA-15 materials and (b) MCM-41 based mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Figure 1. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of Ordered mesoporous silica (OMS) nanoparticles. (a) Original SBA-15 materials and (b) MCM-41 based mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs). Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Ijms 19 01991 g001
Ijms 19 01991 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sequential steps of functionalization process of MSN surface with specific biomolecules. MSN particles before (a) and after (b) functionalization process.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the sequential steps of functionalization process of MSN surface with specific biomolecules. MSN particles before (a) and after (b) functionalization process.
Ijms 19 01991 g002
Ijms 19 01991 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM micrograph of MSN interaction on Hela cell surfaces.
Figure 3. TEM micrograph of MSN interaction on Hela cell surfaces.
Ijms 19 01991 g003
Ijms 19 01991 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Diagram illustrating the main gold nanoparticle applications.
Scheme 1. Diagram illustrating the main gold nanoparticle applications.
Ijms 19 01991 sch001
Ijms 19 01991 g004 550
Figure 4. Electron micrograph of immunogold staining of ultrathin sections of human deep posterior lingual gland showing histatin localization. Gold nanoparticles are mainly visualized in the labelled secretory granules (LSG). Note that adjacent cells contain poorly or unlabelled granules (UG). L = lumen. N = nucleus. Reprinted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2006, Elsevier.
Figure 4. Electron micrograph of immunogold staining of ultrathin sections of human deep posterior lingual gland showing histatin localization. Gold nanoparticles are mainly visualized in the labelled secretory granules (LSG). Note that adjacent cells contain poorly or unlabelled granules (UG). L = lumen. N = nucleus. Reprinted with permission from [43]. Copyright 2006, Elsevier.
Ijms 19 01991 g004
Ijms 19 01991 g005 550
Figure 5. TEM immunogold labelling of ultrathin sections (~60–80 nm thick) of SBA-15 with anti-lysozyme antibody. Gold labelling is detected into cylindrical channels (a) and on the surface of SBA-15 (b). Reprinted with permission from [50]. Copyright 2011, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 5. TEM immunogold labelling of ultrathin sections (~60–80 nm thick) of SBA-15 with anti-lysozyme antibody. Gold labelling is detected into cylindrical channels (a) and on the surface of SBA-15 (b). Reprinted with permission from [50]. Copyright 2011, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Ijms 19 01991 g005
Ijms 19 01991 g006 550
Figure 6. Schematic representation of post embedding immunogold staining (IGS) procedure for protein visualization by conventional TEM. Note that purple and red objects represent additional proteins adsorbed onto OMS. Reprinted with permission from [50]. Copyright 2011, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 6. Schematic representation of post embedding immunogold staining (IGS) procedure for protein visualization by conventional TEM. Note that purple and red objects represent additional proteins adsorbed onto OMS. Reprinted with permission from [50]. Copyright 2011, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Ijms 19 01991 g006
Ijms 19 01991 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) Representation of the antibody fragment-gold nanoparticle [F(ab’)GAMIgG-GPNs] conjugate; and (b,c) Graphical representation of the main sequential steps of silver enhancement process on ultrathin section of F(ab’)GAMIgG-GPNs loaded SBA15. (a) is adapted with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (a) Representation of the antibody fragment-gold nanoparticle [F(ab’)GAMIgG-GPNs] conjugate; and (b,c) Graphical representation of the main sequential steps of silver enhancement process on ultrathin section of F(ab’)GAMIgG-GPNs loaded SBA15. (a) is adapted with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Ijms 19 01991 g007
Ijms 19 01991 g008 550
Figure 8. Transmission electron micrographs of ultrathin sections of SBA-15 particles loaded with F(ab’)GAMIgG-GNPs conjugates. Distribution of gold conjugated F(ab’)GAMIgG in SBA-15 particles was revealed by silver enhancement procedure. Black spots correspond to the “silver enhanced” GNPs (silver labelling). (a) Overview of silver localization in loaded SBA-15 samples. Note that SBA-15 particles show variable labelling. Dark area (asterisks) is due to the electron beam passing through a thicker portion of SBA-15 section; (b) Details showi ng at higher magnification the presence of silver labelling along the parallel channel of loaded SBA-15; and (c) Silver labelling is confined to the external portion of SBA-15 particles. Reprinted with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. Transmission electron micrographs of ultrathin sections of SBA-15 particles loaded with F(ab’)GAMIgG-GNPs conjugates. Distribution of gold conjugated F(ab’)GAMIgG in SBA-15 particles was revealed by silver enhancement procedure. Black spots correspond to the “silver enhanced” GNPs (silver labelling). (a) Overview of silver localization in loaded SBA-15 samples. Note that SBA-15 particles show variable labelling. Dark area (asterisks) is due to the electron beam passing through a thicker portion of SBA-15 section; (b) Details showi ng at higher magnification the presence of silver labelling along the parallel channel of loaded SBA-15; and (c) Silver labelling is confined to the external portion of SBA-15 particles. Reprinted with permission from [57]. Copyright 2015, American Chemical Society.
Ijms 19 01991 g008
Ijms 19 01991 g009 550
Figure 9. TEM micrographs of MSN-HA+BSA-GNPs (a) and MSN-CHIT+BSA-GNPs (b). Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Figure 9. TEM micrographs of MSN-HA+BSA-GNPs (a) and MSN-CHIT+BSA-GNPs (b). Reprinted with permission from [10]. Copyright 2018, Elsevier.
Ijms 19 01991 g009
Ijms 19 01991 g010 550
Figure 10. Assembly of theranostic nanobioconjugates. Schematic representation of the MSN-protein-GNP nanobioconjugate: MSN (orange/blue), protein (red), GNP (yellow) (a), graphical 3D reconstruction of the MSN-protein-GNP nanobioconjugate (b), TEM micrographs of the MSN-lysozyme-GNP (c) and MSN-BSA-GNP (d) nanobioconjugates.
Figure 10. Assembly of theranostic nanobioconjugates. Schematic representation of the MSN-protein-GNP nanobioconjugate: MSN (orange/blue), protein (red), GNP (yellow) (a), graphical 3D reconstruction of the MSN-protein-GNP nanobioconjugate (b), TEM micrographs of the MSN-lysozyme-GNP (c) and MSN-BSA-GNP (d) nanobioconjugates.
Ijms 19 01991 g010

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Piludu, M.; Medda, L.; Monduzzi, M.; Salis, A. Gold Nanoparticles: A Powerful Tool to Visualize Proteins on Ordered Mesoporous Silica and for the Realization of Theranostic Nanobioconjugates. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071991

AMA Style

Piludu M, Medda L, Monduzzi M, Salis A. Gold Nanoparticles: A Powerful Tool to Visualize Proteins on Ordered Mesoporous Silica and for the Realization of Theranostic Nanobioconjugates. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(7):1991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071991

Chicago/Turabian Style

Piludu, Marco, Luca Medda, Maura Monduzzi, and Andrea Salis. 2018. "Gold Nanoparticles: A Powerful Tool to Visualize Proteins on Ordered Mesoporous Silica and for the Realization of Theranostic Nanobioconjugates" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 7: 1991. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19071991

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop