Next Article in Journal
The Potential Roles of the Apoptosis-Related Protein PDRG1 in Diapause Embryo Restarting of Artemia sinica
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Microenvironment in Glioma Invasion: What We Learned from In Vitro Models
Previous Article in Journal
Metal Ion Effects on Aβ and Tau Aggregation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Determinants of Malignant Brain Cancers: From Intracellular Alterations to Invasion Mediated by Extracellular Vesicles
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms19010127
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Differential Characterization of Temozolomide-Resistant Human Glioma Cells

by
Sheng-Wei Lai
1,
Bor-Ren Huang
2,3,4,
Yu-Shu Liu
5,6,
Hsiao-Yun Lin
6,
Chun-Chuan Chen
7,
Cheng-Fang Tsai
5,
Dah-Yuu Lu
6,8,* and
Chingju Lin
9,*
1
Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
2
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
3
Neurosurgery Department, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung 42743, Taiwan
4
School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien 97002, Taiwan
5
Department of Biotechnology, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
6
Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
7
Graduate Institute of Biochemistry, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40249, Taiwan
8
Department of Photonics and Communication Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 41354, Taiwan
9
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(1), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010127
Submission received: 6 October 2017 / Revised: 29 December 2017 / Accepted: 29 December 2017 / Published: 2 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Glioma Cell Invasion)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common type of primary and malignant tumor occurring in the adult central nervous system. Temozolomide (TMZ) has been considered to be one of the most effective chemotherapeutic agents to prolong the survival of patients with glioblastoma. Many glioma cells develop drug-resistance against TMZ that is mediated by increasing O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) levels. The expression of connexin 43 was increased in the resistant U251 subline compared with the parental U251 cells. The expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated regulators, including vimentin, N-cadherin, and β-catenin, was reduced in the resistant U251 subline. In addition, the resistant U251 subline exhibited decreased cell migratory activity and monocyte adhesion ability compared to the parental U251 cells. Furthermore, the resistant U251 subline also expressed lower levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 after treatment with recombinant tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α. These findings suggest differential characteristics in the drug-resistant GBM from the parental glioma cells.

1. Introduction

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor that affects the central nervous system in adults and is one of the deadliest cancers in humans [1]. GBM is characterized by rapid growth, becoming resistant to conventional treatments and poor prognosis [2]. The current clinical management of GBM includes surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, among which is the treatment of the DNA alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) [3], which readily penetrates the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Unfortunately, even with combined treatments, the survival rate hovers around 25% and most patients die within 2 years after the diagnosis [3,4]. A putative markers of glioma progression is the gap junctions (GJs) that highly distributed in the brain [5]. In glioma cells, gap junctions are important channels that contribute to cell-to-cell communication by allowing intercellular transportation of small molecules, second messengers, ions, and electrical signals that help to maintain homeostasis in the multicellular system [6]. Connexin 43 (Cx43), also called gap junction alpha-1 protein (GJA1), is the major component protein of gap junctions in astrocytes [7]. Recently, a number of groups have reported several lines of evidences that the gap junction protein Cx43 regulates the responses of GBM cells to TMZ [8]. A preclinical study has observed an inverse correlation between the Cx43 protein levels in patients and TMZ sensitivity of GBM cells, including GBM stem cells [9]. The study stated that the expression level of Cx43 was inversely correlated with a patient’s survival rate. Some studies have shown that Cx43 is downregulated in high-grade brain tumors [10,11], while others have demonstrated that an increased level of Cx43 is capable of conferring chemotherapeutic resistance to human glioma cells through the upregulation molecular mechanisms [12,13]. Overall, this reflects the lack of consensus for the pro- or anti-tumorigenic role for connexins in GBM.
The invasion of glioma cells into adjacent brain tissues occur in accordance with the activation of multigenic programs. The tumor cell growth and invasion is linked to epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), which is the most important biological process in gliomagenesis and cancer progression [14,15]. EMT is an essential mechanism for the transformation of local glioma tumors into infiltrating tumors by a switching process, where polarized epithelial cells transform into motile mesenchymal cells [16,17]. Recent emerging evidences demonstrated a molecular and phenotypic association between increased chemoresistance and gaining of EMT-like phenotype of cancer cells. EMT also leads to the resistance of glioma cells against various therapeutic strategies [18]. In this study, we evaluated differences between parental glioma cells and a selected resistance subline with respect to migration abilities.
Cancer invasion is complex and involves integrated biochemical processes requiring coordinated efforts of intracellular and extracellular interactions [19]. Therefore, cell surface adhesion molecules play important roles in the cell–cell or cell–microenvironment interactions. It has been reported that the cytokine, TNF-α, is capable of inducing the upregulation of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) [20,21]. VCAM-1 is a molecule with a well-characterized role in the human immune system. It has been shown to be expressed on the surface of tumors and interact with cells that promote tumor invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis [22]. There are evidences indicating that VCAM-1 is upregulated in breast cancer cells and the VCAM-1 signaling networks involves in controlling EMT and chemoresistance in malignant breast tumors [23]. Several recent studies have investigated the mechanisms of tumor escape from immune surveillance and attack that may blunt the efficacious effects of active immunotherapy [24,25]. These studies have identified many distinct loss-of-function and gain-of-function mechanisms of tumor immune evasion. The findings suggested that expression of VCAM-1 in tumors promoted T-cell migration away from tumors, resulting in decreased accumulation of T cells in the tumor microenvironment. This decreased accumulation of T cells around tumor cells may contribute to the ability of VCAM-1 expressing tumor cells to escape immune attack [26]. Another publication demonstrated that high expression of VCAM-1 correlates with abundant monocyte/macrophage infiltration in tumors [27,28]. Thus, we investigated whether there were differential responses between parental glioma cells and the selected TMZ-resistance subline cells under the recombinant TNF-α stimulation.
In this study, protein expression revealed that higher levels of MGMT and Cx43 correlated with TMZ-resistance in glioma cells. We selected the U251 migration-prone subline and characterized its properties with parental glioma cells with respect to migration abilities and the expression of related molecules [29]. Our previous study revealed that higher levels of VCAM-1 correlated with poor prognosis in glioma patients. Besides, the study also showed that EGFR-dependent VCAM-1 expression promoted human monocyte adhesion to GBM [30]. In this study, we investigated and revealed a differential expression of VCAM-1 between the TMZ-resistant and the parental glioma cells.

2. Results

2.1. MGMT and Cx43 Are Upregulated in the TMZ-Resistant U251 Cells

We first characterized the cells based on their morphology. Specifically, the TMZ-resistant cells appeared epithelial-like morphology and are polygonal or round in shape, whereas the parental cells assumed a fibroblastic-like morphology with elongated phenotypes (Figure 1A). We further evaluated the survival rates in TMZ-induced cell death between the parental cells and the TMZ-resistant cells. The cytotoxicity of TMZ ranging from 0 to 1000 μM for 72 h treatment was determined by analyzing cell viability using SRB assay (Figure 1B). The TMZ-resistant subline showed a higher survival rate upon the TMZ treatment than that of the parental cells. TMZ resistance is often associated with an increased MGMT expression, an enzyme that repairs DNA damage induced by TMZ. In addition, it has been reported that Cx43 was found to be more abundantly expressed in GBM tissues when compared with normal brains. Overexpressing Cx43 in GBM cell lines rendered them resistant to TMZ [12,13]. To correlate the relationship between Cx43 and the TMZ resistance, we examined MGMT and Cx43 protein expressions in the U251 parental and TMZ-resistant cells. Consistent with previous reports, the results revealed that MGMT, Cx43, and the phosphorylated Cx43 protein expressions were all upregulated in the TMZ-resistant cells (Figure 1C). The mRNA expressions of MGMT and Cx43 of the TMZ-resistant cells were approximately 300- and 150-fold higher than those of the parental cells.

2.2. The TMZ-Resistant Subline and the Parental Cells Exhibited Differential Migratory Abilities and Protein Expression Profiles

We next evaluated the migratory activities of the U251 and the TMZ-resistant cells. The TMZ-resistant cells exhibited reduced healing ability compared with the parental cells (Figure 2A). TMZ-resistant cells also showed decreased cell mobility and migrated less readily through the membrane pores of cell culture inserts compared with the parental U251 cells. The mobility of the resistant subline cells was approximately 2- and 3-fold lower than that of the parental cells (Figure 2A). Moreover, protein analysis showed that the expression levels of EMT invasive-associated molecules, including β-catenin, N-cadherin, and vimentin, were lower in TMZ-resistant cells than those of the parental cells (Figure 2B). We also examined the proliferation rates between the TMZ-resistant cells and the parental cells. However, no significant differences of cell proliferation between these two cells lines were observed.

2.3. The TMZ-Resistant Subline Showed Decreased Monocyte Adhesion Ability and the Differential Expression of Proliferation-Related Proteins

Several studies reported that the monocytes/macrophages are the major glioma-associated inflammatory cells that constituted the tumor microenvironment [31]. Importantly, a recent report and a clinical study revealed that those monocytes/macrophages are the most predominant tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in GBM [32,33]. It has been indicated that suppressing the tumor-promoting effects of monocytes in glioma could be considered as an adjuvant treatment [34]. The ability of monocytes binding to GBM was determined by the monocyte-binding assay. We compared the monocyte adhesion ability between the TMZ-resistant subline and the parental cells, and it revealed that the TMZ-resistant subline exhibited reduced monocyte adhesion compared with the parental cells (Figure 3A). The binding of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to its receptor (EGFR) activates several signaling intermediates, including AKT, leading to control of cell survival and metabolism [35]. We further investigated the expression levels of proliferation-associated molecules and found that the expressions of EGFR and AKT were decreased in TMZ-resistant cells (Figure 3B). In addition, it has been reported that the activation of AKT leads to activate kinases and inhibit GSK3 by phosphorylating the inhibitory serines on GSK3 in resting cells [36]. The phosphorylation level of GSK3β can be enhanced by the activation of eIF2α kinases [37]. According to our data, elevated levels of phosphorylated GSK3β and eIF2α expression were observed in TMZ-resistant cells (Figure 3B).

2.4. The TMZ-Resistant Subline Exhibited Lower Sensitivity to TNFα-Induction

TNF-α is a major cytokine in the tumor microenvironment and its expression correlates with the GBM tumor grades [38,39]. We next examined the effect of TNF-α on monocyte adhesion in GBM. As shown in Figure 4A, treatment of GBMs with TNF-α induced THP-1 monocyte adhesion to GBM in a time-dependent manner. Interestingly, TNF-α treatment was found to depress monocyte adhesion ability in the TMZ-resistant cells compared with the parental cells. We next evaluated the effects of the cytokine administration on the induction of VCAM-1 expression. The flow cytometry analysis revealed that the expression of VCAM-1 was elevated by the TNF-α treatment in the parental cells. However, the expression of VCAM-1 induced by TNF-α was decreased in the TMZ-resistant cells (Figure 4B). The same results were also observed by Western blot analysis (Figure 4C). These findings suggest that the TMZ-resistant subline had lower sensitivity to TNF-α-induced monocyte adhesion and VCAM-1 expression than U251 parental cells.

3. Discussion

The present study demonstrated the heterogeneous nature of GBM cells and the inherent issues of treating any CNS cancer due to its limited repair mechanisms that make a presumably successful treatment of drug resistant GBM cells a difficult goal [40]. In this study, we have observed several characteristics of the TMZ-resistant cells. First, we established a cancer cell subline with high TMZ-resistant ability and revealed that the TMZ-resistant subline had lower migration and invasion ability. Second, we found more abundant expression of MGMT in TMZ-resistant cells, which also showed higher expression levels of gap junction protein Cx43. During cancer progression, the tumor cell migration is essential for invasion and dissemination into surrounding tissues [41]. Clinical conditions where epithelial cells are transformed to a mesenchymal phenotype usually indicate poor prognostic outcome [42]. Third, the results showed that the TMZ-resistant subline has decreased migratory activity compared with the parental cells. The differential expression levels of EMT-associated markers were observed between these two cell lines. Fourth, the TMZ-resistant cells were less liable than the parental cells to TNF-α treatment with regard to the expression of VCAM-1 and monocyte adhesion.
In clinical studies, even patients with initial glioma tumor control will inevitably relapse or progress during or after TMZ therapy. In human gliomas, the expression of MGMT proteins has been detected and regarded as a prognostic factor [43,44]. Low basal expressions of the tumor MGMT protein and the MGMT promoter hyper-methylation are each associated with prolonged survival for GBM patients treated with TMZ [45,46]. A previous study has shown that the protein expression of MGMT could serve as a potential negative molecular regulator of GBM migration and invasion [47].
There is a general agreement that the heterocellular Cx43 gap junctions formed between glioma-astrocytes and glioma-endothelial cells facilitate invasion [48,49,50]. Cx43 can exert both tumor suppression and oncogenic functions [51]. During epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and the period of overt tumor infiltration, there is a loss of intercellular communication through gap junction (GJIC) between the malignant cells [52]. Furthermore, a reduction in Cx43 level in U251 human glioma cells usually showed an increase in migration [53,54]. Our results corroborated the results of a previous study indicating that Cx43 expression upregulated in the U251-resistant subline changes the mode of migration [55].
Emerging evidences have implicated that EMT is associated with cancer cell invasion and tumor progression. The EMT features correlate with poor survival rates and an increased risk of cancer recurrence among patients with various solid tumor types, such as colon cancer and breast cancer [56,57]. More importantly, EMT is also associated with therapeutic resistance [58]. Recent studies have shown that EMT was closely related to chemoresistance with elevated MGMT expression [59]. Therefore, canonical signaling regulated by MAPK and PI3K/AKT have involved in the regulation of EMT concerning the tumor resistance and recurrence [58]. Taken together, cancer progression mechanisms are intimately linked to EMT in multiple solid tumors. Thus, the role of EMT in therapeutic resistance is evident. This is the result both of the stem cell-like properties acquired by cells undergoing EMT and of its being a means of potentiating tumor heterogeneity. Our study investigated the role of EMT in drug-resistance and heterogeneity of these different lines in terms of tumor control of cell motility. While many studies have shown that migration and EMT are positively correlated with high grade and resistant phenotype in glioma cells, our study implies that other mechanisms might be involved in EMT’s negatively regulating the motility of TMZ-resistant cells.
EGFR is most commonly amplified and mutated in GBM, leading to overexpression and activation of downstream signaling pathways [60,61]. EGFR signals through a complex network of intermediates including PI3K, AKT, and MAPK. Overexpression of EGFR signaling results in proliferation, invasiveness, increased motility, inhibition of apoptosis, and resistance to chemotherapy [62]. Our previous study provided evidences that cytokines enhance VCAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion, which is regulated by EGFR expression [30]. It has also been published that HER2/PI3K/AKT activation leads to multiple drug resistance in human breast cancer [63]. AKT pathway plays a role in conferring a broad chemoresistance in breast cancer and provides potential strategies for targeting this pathway for enhancing cancer chemotherapy [64]. The AKT targeting of mTOR signaling pathway is hyper-activated or altered in many cancer types and regulates a broad range of cellular processes including survival, angiogenesis, and metastasis [65]. However, no significant expression differences of phosphorylated mTOR were observed between the TMZ-resistant cells and the parental cells in this study. The best-characterized AKT targets are the GSK-3. In the current study, we showed the differential expression of the downstream GSK-3β and elF2α in glioma cell lines. An increased level of eIF2α kinases in the TMZ-resistant subline was observed, which conformed with a previous report that activated eIF2α kinases also leads to the activation of GSK3β [66].
Glioma-associated microglia has been reported to secrete immunosuppressive factors that contribute to immune surveillance [67]. Previous reports showed that the VCAM-1 expression in tumor cells has been considered as a potential therapeutic target in immune evasion [68]. Several recent studies have revealed the mechanisms of tumor escape from immune surveillance and attack that may blunt the efficacious effects of active immunotherapy [24,25]. The present study demonstrated that VCAM-1 expression was induced in GBM treated with TNF-α, which subsequently promoted the interaction between monocytes and GBM. Importantly, there was a positive correlation between the VCAM-1 expression and the activities of adherent monocytes in GBM [30]. Our previous study indicated that the levels of VCAM-1 in the GBM correlate highly with the activities of monocyte binding to GBM and that knockdown of VCAM-1 abolishes the enhancement of monocyte adhesion [30]. Our results showed that the TMZ-resistant subline had lower levels of TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 than that of the parental U251 cells, which may benefit the tumor microenvironment by achieving immune evasion.
The complicated heterogeneity of glioblastoma multiforme attributes to the differential responses of different GBM sublines. This study identified functional differences between the U251 TMZ-resistant subline and the U251 parental cells. Although results from these cell models might not completely correlate with the clinic-pathological grades of glioma tissues, it is worth noting the distinct characteristics between the parental and the resistant sublines. In summary, our results show that connexin 43 was upregulated in the resistant U251 subline compared with the parental U251 cell. In addition, EMT-associated regulators were downregulated in the resistant U251 subline. The resistant U251 subline also exhibited lower cell migration and monocyte adhesion ability compared with the parental U251 cell. Furthermore, the resistant U251 subline also expressed lower levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule VCAM-1 than the parental cells upon stimulation with recombinant TNFα. These findings suggest differential characteristics in the drug-resistant GBM from parental glioma cells. These observations demonstrated that the extent of intratumoral heterogeneity in glioma influences cell migratory activity as well as the expression of intrinsic adhesion proteins. Further functional studies on potential molecular markers may provide therapeutic strategies for targeting malignant glioma cells.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

TNF-α was purchased from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Primary antibodies specific for α-tubulin (T5168) and vimentin (V6630) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Primary antibodies specific for VCAM-1 (ab134047), MGMT (ab108630), and β-catenin (ab16051) were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Primary antibodies specific for AKT1/2/3 (sc-8312), p-AKT1/2/3 (Ser473, sc-7985-R), connexins 43 (sc-271837), eIF2α (sc-133132), and N-cadherin (sc-7939) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Primary antibodies specific for EGFR (4267), p-Cx43 (Ser368, 3511), and p-mTOR (Ser2448, 2971) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Primary antibodies specific for p-GSK3β (Tyr216, 44604G) was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.2. Cell Culture

U251 human GBM cells were obtained from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (JCRB No. IFO50288, Tokyo, Japan). THP-1 human monocytes were obtained from the Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC Nos. 60360, 60582 and 60430; Hsinchu, Taiwan). TMZ-resistant subline were established and maintained in our laboratory. Briefly, the TMZ-resistant (U251-R) subline was generated by repetitive pulse exposure of U251 GBM cells to TMZ (500 µM) for 72 h every week. The undead U251-R cells were seeded at 6 cm dish and growing for 2 weeks. The cycle was repeated for 3 months. Multiple clones of U251-R were established to stably exhibit TMZ resistance. U251 were maintained in Minimum Essential Medium, THP-1 was maintained in RPMI-1640. All cells were cultured in medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 mg/mL streptomycin and were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% air.

4.3. Monocyte-Binding Assay

THP-1 cells were labeled with 0.1 μg/mL BCECF/AM (Invitrogen, Green) at 37 °C for 1 h followed by washed twice with growth medium. GBM cells were treated with TNF-α for indicated periods. The medium was removed from the wells, and 2.5 × 105 BCECF/AM-labeled-THP-1 cells were added to a monolayer GBM cells. After incubation at 37 °C for 30 min, the wells were gently washed twice with warm growth medium to remove non-adherent cells. The cells were then photographed under a fluorescence microscope to calculate adherent cells.

4.4. Flow Cytometry Assay

GBM cells were incubated with anti-VCAM-1-conjugated PE antibody (eBioscience, 12-1069), isotype IgG control (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for 60 min at 4 °C. Expression of these surface receptors was determined using a NovoCyte flow cytometer (ACEA Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA). Ten thousand events were recorded and GBM cells were examined for VCAM-1 expression.

4.5. Western Blot

The procedure of Western blotting was described previously [69,70]. In brief, the supernatants were collected by centrifugation at 13,000× g for 30 min and stored at −20 °C. Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk in Tris-Buffered Saline and Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature and then probed overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C. After three TBST washes, the membranes were incubated with secondary antibodies. The blots were visualized using enhanced chemilumminescence and Kodak X-OMAT LS film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Quantitative data were obtained using ImageJ software (version 2.0, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).

4.6. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time PCR (q-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from glioma cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and was quantified using the BioDrop spectrophotometer (Cambridge, UK). The target mRNA levels was detected using quantitative real-time PCR. The reverse transcription (RT) reaction was performed using 2 μg of total RNA converted into cDNA using the Invitrogen RT Kit and amplified using the following oligonucleotide primers: MGMT: 5′-CCTGGCTGAATGCCTATTTC-3′ and 5′-GATGAGGATGGGGACAGGATT-3′; Cx43: 5′-TCGGGTTAAGGGAAAGAG-3′ and 5′-GCTCACTTGCTTGCTTGT-3′; β-actin: 5′-AGAGCTACGAGCTGCCTGAC-3′ and 5′-AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3′. The protocol of qPCR was referred to our previous report. PCR amplification was performed in final volumes of 10 μL using ExiLENT SYBR Green master mix (EXIQON).

4.7. Wound-Healing Assay

U251 or TMZ-resistant glioma cells were seeded onto cell culture plates with Ibidi Culture-Inserts in the middle of the wells. A cell-free gap of 500 μM was thus generated after removing the Ibidi Culture-Insert. The images were acquired after 0, 12, and 24 h using a digital camera and a light microscope.

4.8. Sulforhodamine B Assay (SRB)

The SRB assay is based on the measurement of cellular protein content and the procedure was followed according to our previous report [71]. After treatment with TMZ for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, cells were fixed with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and stained by SRB at 0.4% (w/v) in 1% acetic acid for 1 h. Unbound SRB was washed out by 1% acetic acid and SRB-bound cells were solubilized with 10 mM Trizma base. The absorbance was read at a wavelength of 515 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA).

4.9. PrestoBlue Proliferation Assay

U251 or TMZ-resistant glioma cells were seeded at a density of 5 × 103 cells per well in 96 plates. The cells were cultured with medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. The proliferation rate of these two cells was measured by using PrestoBlue cell viability reagent (Invitrogen, New York, NY, USA). According to the manufacturer’s protocol. The absorbance was read at a wavelength of 570/600 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT, USA) after addition and incubation with the reagent.

4.10. Statistics

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism6 software (version 6, GraphPad software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and SigmaPlot software (version 10.0, Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Data are presented as means ± S.E.M. Statistical analysis between two samples was assessed by a Student’s t-test. One-way ANOVA assessed statistical analysis between three or more independent group. In all cases, a value of p less than 0.05 was considered significant. p-Values are indicated in the figure legends.

5. Conclusions

This study identified functional differences between the TMZ-resistant subline and the parental cells. Our results showed that connexin 43 was upregulated in the resistant U251 subline compared with the parental U251 cell. In addition, EMT-associated regulator molecules were downregulated in the resistant U251 subline. The resistant U251 subline also exhibited lower cell migration activity and monocyte adhesion ability compared with the parental U251 cell. Furthermore, the resistant U251 subline expressed lower levels of VCAM-1 after administration with the recombinant TNF-α. These findings suggested differential characteristics between the drug-resistant GBM and the parental glioma cells. These investigations demonstrated that the extent of intratumoral heterogeneity in glioma influences cell migratory activity as well as the expression of intrinsic adhesion proteins. Further functional studies on potential molecular markers may provide therapeutic strategies for targeting malignant glioma cells.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported in part by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (105-2811-B-039-025-, 106-2320-B-039-034- and 105-2320-B-468-004-MY3), China Medical University (CMU105-AWARD-01, CMU106-S-11, CMU102-ASIA-24 and CMU103-ASIA-02), and Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (MOHW106-TDU-B-212-113004).

Author Contributions

Sheng-Wei Lai, Bor-Ren Huang, Cheng-Fang Tsai, Ching-Ju Lin, and Dah-Yuu Lu conceived and designed the study; Sheng-Wei Lai, Ching-Ju Lin, and Dah-Yuu Lu wrote the manuscript; Sheng-Wei Lai, and Chun-Chuan Chen performed experiments; Yu-Shu Liu, and Hsiao-Yun Lin provided experiments with help; Sheng-Wei Lai, and Dah-Yuu Lu analyzed results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cloughesy, T.F.; Cavenee, W.K.; Mischel, P.S. Glioblastoma: From molecular pathology to targeted treatment. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2014, 9, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, Y.H.; Kim, T.; Joo, J.D.; Han, J.H.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, I.A.; Yun, C.H.; Kim, C.Y. Survival benefit of levetiracetam in patients treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy with temozolomide for glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer 2015, 121, 2926–2932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hegi, M.E.; Diserens, A.C.; Gorlia, T.; Hamou, M.F.; de Tribolet, N.; Weller, M.; Kros, J.M.; Hainfellner, J.A.; Mason, W.; Mariani, L.; et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Clarke, J.; Butowski, N.; Chang, S. Recent advances in therapy for glioblastoma. Arch. Neurol. 2010, 67, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Crespin, S.; Fromont, G.; Wager, M.; Levillain, P.; Cronier, L.; Monvoisin, A.; Defamie, N.; Mesnil, M. Expression of a gap junction protein, connexin43, in a large panel of human gliomas: New insights. Cancer Med. 2016, 5, 1742–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dermietzel, R.; Hertberg, E.L.; Kessler, J.A.; Spray, D.C. Gap junctions between cultured astrocytes: Immunocytochemical, molecular, and electrophysiological analysis. J. Neurosci. 1991, 11, 1421–1432. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Giaume, C.; Koulakoff, A.; Roux, L.; Holcman, D.; Rouach, N. Astroglial networks: A step further in neuroglial and gliovascular interactions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11, 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chen, W.; Wang, D.; Du, X.; He, Y.; Chen, S.; Shao, Q.; Ma, C.; Huang, B.; Chen, A.; Zhao, P.; et al. Glioma cells escaped from cytotoxicity of temozolomide and vincristine by communicating with human astrocytes. Med. Oncol. 2015, 32, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Murphy, S.F.; Varghese, R.T.; Lamouille, S.; Guo, S.; Pridham, K.J.; Kanabur, P.; Osimani, A.M.; Sharma, S.; Jourdan, J.; Rodgers, C.M.; et al. Connexin 43 Inhibition Sensitizes Chemoresistant Glioblastoma Cells to Temozolomide. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pu, P.; Xia, Z.; Yu, S.; Huang, Q. Altered expression of Cx43 in astrocytic tumors. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2004, 107, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Soroceanu, L.; Manning, T.J.; Sontheimer, H. Reduced expression of connexin-43 and functional gap junction coupling in human gliomas. Glia 2001, 33, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gielen, P.R.; Aftab, Q.; Ma, N.; Chen, V.C.; Hong, X.; Lozinsky, S.; Naus, C.C.; Sin, W.C. Connexin43 confers Temozolomide resistance in human glioma cells by modulating the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Neuropharmacology 2013, 75, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Munoz, J.L.; Rodriguez-Cruz, V.; Greco, S.J.; Ramkissoon, S.H.; Ligon, K.L.; Rameshwar, P. Temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells occurs partly through epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated induction of connexin 43. Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rajesh, Y.; Biswas, A.; Mandal, M. Glioma progression through the prism of heat shock protein mediated extracellular matrix remodeling and epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Exp. Cell Res. 2017, 359, 299–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Li, W.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Hong, L.; Yuan, N.; Wang, X.; Lv, H. IKBKE Upregulation is positively associated with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung in vivo and malignant transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015, 21, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, H.W.; Menon, L.G.; Black, P.M.; Carroll, R.S.; Johnson, M.D. SNAI2/Slug promotes growth and invasion in human gliomas. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mikheeva, S.A.; Mikheev, A.M.; Petit, A.; Beyer, R.; Oxford, R.G.; Khorasani, L.; Maxwell, J.P.; Glackin, C.A.; Wakimoto, H.; Gonzalez-Herrero, I.; et al. TWIST1 promotes invasion through mesenchymal change in human glioblastoma. Mol. Cancer 2010, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Pala, A.; Karpel-Massler, G.; Kast, R.E.; Wirtz, C.R.; Halatsch, M.E. Epidermal to Mesenchymal Transition and Failure of EGFR-Targeted Therapy in Glioblastoma. Cancers 2012, 4, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nakada, M.; Nakada, S.; Demuth, T.; Tran, N.L.; Hoelzinger, D.B.; Berens, M.E. Molecular targets of glioma invasion. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 458–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, H.J.; Tsoy, I.; Park, J.M.; Chung, J.I.; Shin, S.C.; Chang, K.C. Anthocyanins from soybean seed coat inhibit the expression of TNF-alpha-induced genes associated with ischemia/reperfusion in endothelial cell by NF-kappaB-dependent pathway and reduce rat myocardial damages incurred by ischemia and reperfusion in vivo. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1391–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nizamutdinova, I.T.; Oh, H.M.; Min, Y.N.; Park, S.H.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, J.S.; Yean, M.H.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, Y.S.; Chang, K.C.; et al. Paeonol suppresses intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in tumor necrosis factor-alpha-stimulated human umbilical vein endothelial cells by blocking p38, ERK and nuclear factor-kappaB signaling pathways. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2007, 7, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Qian, B.Z.; Pollard, J.W. Macrophage diversity enhances tumor progression and metastasis. Cell 2010, 141, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wang, P.C.; Weng, C.C.; Hou, Y.S.; Jian, S.F.; Fang, K.T.; Hou, M.F.; Cheng, K.H. Activation of VCAM-1 and its associated molecule CD44 leads to increased malignant potential of breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 3560–3579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dunn, G.P.; Old, L.J.; Schreiber, R.D. The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2004, 22, 329–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khong, H.T.; Restifo, N.P. Natural selection of tumor variants in the generation of “tumor escape” phenotypes. Nat. Immunol. 2002, 3, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wu, T.C. The role of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 in tumor immune evasion. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 6003–6006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chen, Q.; Massague, J. Molecular pathways: VCAM-1 as a potential therapeutic target in metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 5520–5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lu, X.; Mu, E.; Wei, Y.; Riethdorf, S.; Yang, Q.; Yuan, M.; Yan, J.; Hua, Y.; Tiede, B.J.; Lu, X.; et al. VCAM-1 promotes osteolytic expansion of indolent bone micrometastasis of breast cancer by engaging alpha4beta1-positive osteoclast progenitors. Cancer Cell 2011, 20, 701–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Yeh, W.L.; Lin, H.Y.; Huang, C.Y.; Huang, B.R.; Lin, C.; Lu, D.Y.; Wei, K.C. Migration-prone glioma cells show curcumin resistance associated with enhanced expression of miR-21 and invasion/anti-apoptosis-related proteins. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37770–37781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Liu, Y.S.; Lin, H.Y.; Lai, S.W.; Huang, C.Y.; Huang, B.R.; Chen, P.Y.; Wei, K.C.; Lu, D.Y. MiR-181b modulates EGFR-dependent VCAM-1 expression and monocyte adhesion in glioblastoma. Oncogene 2017, 36, 5006–5022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hussain, S.F.; Yang, D.; Suki, D.; Aldape, K.; Grimm, E.; Heimberger, A.B. The role of human glioma-infiltrating microglia/macrophages in mediating antitumor immune responses. Neuro Oncol. 2006, 8, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, W.; Ke, S.Q.; Huang, Z.; Flavahan, W.; Fang, X.; Paul, J.; Wu, L.; Sloan, A.E.; McLendon, R.E.; Li, X.; et al. Periostin secreted by glioblastoma stem cells recruits M2 tumour-associated macrophages and promotes malignant growth. Nat. Cell Biol. 2015, 17, 170–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Parney, I.F.; Waldron, J.S.; Parsa, A.T. Flow cytometry and in vitro analysis of human glioma-associated macrophages. Laboratory investigation. J. Neurosurg. 2009, 110, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Feng, X.; Szulzewsky, F.; Yerevanian, A.; Chen, Z.; Heinzmann, D.; Rasmussen, R.D.; Alvarez-Garcia, V.; Kim, Y.; Wang, B.; Tamagno, I.; et al. Loss of CX3CR1 increases accumulation of inflammatory monocytes and promotes gliomagenesis. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 15077–15094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Garay, C.; Judge, G.; Lucarelli, S.; Bautista, S.; Pandey, R.; Singh, T.; Antonescu, C.N. Epidermal growth factor-stimulated Akt phosphorylation requires clathrin or ErbB2 but not receptor endocytosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2015, 26, 3504–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Beurel, E.; Grieco, S.F.; Jope, R.S. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3): Regulation, actions, and diseases. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015, 148, 114–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Die, L.; Yan, P.; Jun Jiang, Z.; Min Hua, T.; Cai, W.; Xing, L. Glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta inhibitor suppresses Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide-induced CD40 expression by inhibiting nuclear factor-kappa B activation in mouse osteoblasts. Mol. Immunol. 2012, 52, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Crusz, S.M.; Balkwill, F.R. Inflammation and cancer: Advances and new agents. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 12, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Maruno, M.; Kovach, J.S.; Kelly, P.J.; Yanagihara, T. Distribution of endogenous tumour necrosis factor alpha in gliomas. J. Clin. Pathol. 1997, 50, 559–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Haar, C.P.; Hebbar, P.; Wallace, G.C. t.; Das, A.; Vandergrift, W.A., 3rd; Smith, J.A.; Giglio, P.; Patel, S.J.; Ray, S.K.; Banik, N.L. Drug resistance in glioblastoma: A mini review. Neurochem. Res. 2012, 37, 1192–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wong, I.Y.; Javaid, S.; Wong, E.A.; Perk, S.; Haber, D.A.; Toner, M.; Irimia, D. Collective and individual migration following the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 1063–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Son, H.; Moon, A. Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition and Cell Invasion. Toxicol. Res. 2010, 26, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Brandes, A.A.; Franceschi, E.; Tosoni, A.; Bartolini, S.; Bacci, A.; Agati, R.; Ghimenton, C.; Turazzi, S.; Talacchi, A.; Skrap, M.; et al. O6-methylguanine DNA-methyltransferase methylation status can change between first surgery for newly diagnosed glioblastoma and second surgery for recurrence: Clinical implications. Neuro Oncol. 2010, 12, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Christmann, M.; Nagel, G.; Horn, S.; Krahn, U.; Wiewrodt, D.; Sommer, C.; Kaina, B. MGMT activity, promoter methylation and immunohistochemistry of pretreatment and recurrent malignant gliomas: A comparative study on astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 127, 2106–2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Hegi, M.E.; Diserens, A.C.; Godard, S.; Dietrich, P.Y.; Regli, L.; Ostermann, S.; Otten, P.; Van Melle, G.; de Tribolet, N.; Stupp, R. Clinical trial substantiates the predictive value of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation in glioblastoma patients treated with temozolomide. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 1871–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Paz, M.F.; Yaya-Tur, R.; Rojas-Marcos, I.; Reynes, G.; Pollan, M.; Aguirre-Cruz, L.; Garcia-Lopez, J.L.; Piquer, J.; Safont, M.J.; Balana, C.; et al. CpG island hypermethylation of the DNA repair enzyme methyltransferase predicts response to temozolomide in primary gliomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 4933–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chahal, M.; Abdulkarim, B.; Xu, Y.; Guiot, M.C.; Easaw, J.C.; Stifani, N.; Sabri, S. O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is a novel negative effector of invasion in glioblastoma multiforme. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 2440–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Ravanti, L.; Hakkinen, L.; Larjava, H.; Saarialho-Kere, U.; Foschi, M.; Han, J.; Kahari, V.M. Transforming growth factor-beta induces collagenase-3 expression by human gingival fibroblasts via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 37292–37300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lin, J.H.; Takano, T.; Cotrina, M.L.; Arcuino, G.; Kang, J.; Liu, S.; Gao, Q.; Jiang, L.; Li, F.; Lichtenberg-Frate, H.; et al. Connexin 43 enhances the adhesivity and mediates the invasion of malignant glioma cells. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 4302–4311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Oliveira, R.; Christov, C.; Guillamo, J.S.; de Bouard, S.; Palfi, S.; Venance, L.; Tardy, M.; Peschanski, M. Contribution of gap junctional communication between tumor cells and astroglia to the invasion of the brain parenchyma by human glioblastomas. BMC Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Warn-Cramer, B.J.; Lau, A.F. Regulation of gap junctions by tyrosine protein kinases. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1662, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Crespin, S.; Bechberger, J.; Mesnil, M.; Naus, C.C.; Sin, W.C. The carboxy-terminal tail of connexin43 gap junction protein is sufficient to mediate cytoskeleton changes in human glioma cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 2010, 110, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Strale, P.O.; Clarhaut, J.; Lamiche, C.; Cronier, L.; Mesnil, M.; Defamie, N. Down-regulation of Connexin43 expression reveals the involvement of caveolin-1 containing lipid rafts in human U251 glioblastoma cell invasion. Mol. Carcinog. 2012, 51, 845–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sin, W.C.; Crespin, S.; Mesnil, M. Opposing roles of connexin43 in glioma progression. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lu, J.; Yu, M.; Lin, Z.; Lue, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, H.; Xu, Y.; Liu, H. Effects of Connexin43 Overexpression on U251 Cell Growth, Migration, and Apoptosis. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017, 23, 2917–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Brabletz, T.; Hlubek, F.; Spaderna, S.; Schmalhofer, O.; Hiendlmeyer, E.; Jung, A.; Kirchner, T. Invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer: Epithelial-mesenchymal transition, mesenchymal-epithelial transition, stem cells and beta-catenin. Cells Tissues Organs 2005, 179, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Trimboli, A.J.; Fukino, K.; de Bruin, A.; Wei, G.; Shen, L.; Tanner, S.M.; Creasap, N.; Rosol, T.J.; Robinson, M.L.; Eng, C.; et al. Direct evidence for epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 937–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Smith, B.N.; Bhowmick, N.A. Role of EMT in Metastasis and Therapy Resistance. J. Clin. Med. 2016, 5, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Siebzehnrubl, F.A.; Silver, D.J.; Tugertimur, B.; Deleyrolle, L.P.; Siebzehnrubl, D.; Sarkisian, M.R.; Devers, K.G.; Yachnis, A.T.; Kupper, M.D.; Neal, D.; et al. The ZEB1 pathway links glioblastoma initiation, invasion and chemoresistance. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 1196–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ekstrand, A.J.; James, C.D.; Cavenee, W.K.; Seliger, B.; Pettersson, R.F.; Collins, V.P. Genes for epidermal growth factor receptor, transforming growth factor alpha, and epidermal growth factor and their expression in human gliomas in vivo. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 2164–2172. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Wong, A.J.; Ruppert, J.M.; Bigner, S.H.; Grzeschik, C.H.; Humphrey, P.A.; Bigner, D.S.; Vogelstein, B. Structural alterations of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in human gliomas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 2965–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Brandes, A.A.; Franceschi, E.; Tosoni, A.; Hegi, M.E.; Stupp, R. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in neuro-oncology: Hopes and disappointments. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 957–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Knuefermann, C.; Lu, Y.; Liu, B.; Jin, W.; Liang, K.; Wu, L.; Schmidt, M.; Mills, G.B.; Mendelsohn, J.; Fan, Z. HER2/PI-3K/Akt activation leads to a multidrug resistance in human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Oncogene 2003, 22, 3205–3212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Zhu, X.; He, Z.; Wu, J.; Yuan, J.; Wen, W.; Hu, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Lin, C.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, M.; et al. A marine anthraquinone SZ-685C overrides adriamycin-resistance in breast cancer cells through suppressing Akt signaling. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 694–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ersahin, T.; Tuncbag, N.; Cetin-Atalay, R. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR interactive pathway. Mol. Biosyst. 2015, 11, 1946–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Baltzis, D.; Pluquet, O.; Papadakis, A.I.; Kazemi, S.; Qu, L.K.; Koromilas, A.E. The eIF2alpha kinases PERK and PKR activate glycogen synthase kinase 3 to promote the proteasomal degradation of p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 31675–31687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Zhang, L.; Handel, M.V.; Schartner, J.M.; Hagar, A.; Allen, G.; Curet, M.; Badie, B. Regulation of IL-10 expression by upstream stimulating factor (USF-1) in glioma-associated microglia. J. Neuroimmunol. 2007, 184, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Lin, K.Y.; Lu, D.; Hung, C.F.; Peng, S.; Huang, L.; Jie, C.; Murillo, F.; Rowley, J.; Tsai, Y.C.; He, L.; et al. Ectopic expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 as a new mechanism for tumor immune evasion. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 1832–1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lin, H.Y.; Huang, B.R.; Yeh, W.L.; Lee, C.H.; Huang, S.S.; Lai, C.H.; Lin, H.; Lu, D.Y. Antineuroinflammatory effects of lycopene via activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-alpha1/heme oxygenase-1 pathways. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lin, H.Y.; Yeh, W.L.; Huang, B.R.; Lin, C.; Lai, C.H.; Lin, H.; Lu, D.Y. Desipramine protects neuronal cell death and induces heme oxygenase-1 expression in Mes23.5 dopaminergic neurons. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Huang, S.M.; Cheung, C.W.; Chang, C.S.; Tang, C.H.; Liu, J.F.; Lin, Y.H.; Chen, J.H.; Ko, S.H.; Wong, K.L.; Lu, D.Y. Phloroglucinol derivative MCPP induces cell apoptosis in human colon cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 2011, 112, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 00127 g001 550
Figure 1. Effects of TMZ treatment on MGMT and Cx43 expression in GBM. Human U251 glioma cells were treated with TMZ or non-treated to induce TMZ-resistant U251 cells and parental U251 cells, respectively. (A) The TMZ-resistant cells and the parental cells have a distinctive morphology. Scale bar = 20 μM. (B) Determination of the TMZ (0–1000 µM, for 72 h)-induced cell death in parental U251 cells and TMZ-resistant U251 cells. Analyzed by SRB assay for cell viability. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the parental group; (C) MGMT, Cx43, and p-Cx43 expression were determined using Western blot analysis in parental and TMZ-resistant cells.
Figure 1. Effects of TMZ treatment on MGMT and Cx43 expression in GBM. Human U251 glioma cells were treated with TMZ or non-treated to induce TMZ-resistant U251 cells and parental U251 cells, respectively. (A) The TMZ-resistant cells and the parental cells have a distinctive morphology. Scale bar = 20 μM. (B) Determination of the TMZ (0–1000 µM, for 72 h)-induced cell death in parental U251 cells and TMZ-resistant U251 cells. Analyzed by SRB assay for cell viability. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the parental group; (C) MGMT, Cx43, and p-Cx43 expression were determined using Western blot analysis in parental and TMZ-resistant cells.
Ijms 19 00127 g001
Ijms 19 00127 g002 550
Figure 2. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited lower migratory ability than parental glioma cells. (A) After the TMZ selection, the parental U251 and their corresponding TMZ-resistant subline were seeded for indicated time periods (0, 12, and 24 h). Cell migration was determined using a wound-healing assay. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited decreased migration ability compared with parental cells. Representative images are shown. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the control group. (B) The protein expression profiles of the U251 and the TMZ-resistant cells. Protein expression levels of EMT-associated markers were determined using Western blotting.
Figure 2. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited lower migratory ability than parental glioma cells. (A) After the TMZ selection, the parental U251 and their corresponding TMZ-resistant subline were seeded for indicated time periods (0, 12, and 24 h). Cell migration was determined using a wound-healing assay. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited decreased migration ability compared with parental cells. Representative images are shown. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the control group. (B) The protein expression profiles of the U251 and the TMZ-resistant cells. Protein expression levels of EMT-associated markers were determined using Western blotting.
Ijms 19 00127 g002
Ijms 19 00127 g003 550
Figure 3. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited lower monocyte adhesion ability than the parental glioma cells. (A) Parental and TMZ-resistant cells were seeded for 24 h. Followed by incubation with the addition of BCECF-AM-labeled-THP-1 for 30 min, the adherence of THP-1 to GBM was evaluated. The ability of monocyte adhesion to GBM was evaluated by measuring the number of BCECFAM-labeled-THP-1 by the fluorescence microscopy. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the parental group. (B) The protein expression profiles of parental and TMZ-resistant cells. Protein expression levels of proliferation-associated markers were determined using Western blotting.
Figure 3. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited lower monocyte adhesion ability than the parental glioma cells. (A) Parental and TMZ-resistant cells were seeded for 24 h. Followed by incubation with the addition of BCECF-AM-labeled-THP-1 for 30 min, the adherence of THP-1 to GBM was evaluated. The ability of monocyte adhesion to GBM was evaluated by measuring the number of BCECFAM-labeled-THP-1 by the fluorescence microscopy. Quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the parental group. (B) The protein expression profiles of parental and TMZ-resistant cells. Protein expression levels of proliferation-associated markers were determined using Western blotting.
Ijms 19 00127 g003
Ijms 19 00127 g004 550
Figure 4. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited a lower sensitivity to TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 expression. (A) Parental U251 and TMZ-resistant cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) for indicated time periods (0, 12, 24 h) followed by incubation with BCECF-AM-labeled-THP-1 for 30 min. The monocyte-binding ability was examined by the fluorescence microscopy and the one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was performed. The data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the control group. (B) U251 and TMZ-resistant cells were treated with various concentrations of TNF-α (5 or 10 ng/mL) for 24 h and the expression of cell surface VCAM-1 was determined by using flow cytometry. (C) Cells were treated with various concentrations (5 or 10 ng/mL) of TNF-α for 24 h. VCAM-1 and Cx43 expressions were determined using Western blot analysis.
Figure 4. TMZ-resistant cells exhibited a lower sensitivity to TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 expression. (A) Parental U251 and TMZ-resistant cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) for indicated time periods (0, 12, 24 h) followed by incubation with BCECF-AM-labeled-THP-1 for 30 min. The monocyte-binding ability was examined by the fluorescence microscopy and the one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was performed. The data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. * p < 0.05 compared with the control group. (B) U251 and TMZ-resistant cells were treated with various concentrations of TNF-α (5 or 10 ng/mL) for 24 h and the expression of cell surface VCAM-1 was determined by using flow cytometry. (C) Cells were treated with various concentrations (5 or 10 ng/mL) of TNF-α for 24 h. VCAM-1 and Cx43 expressions were determined using Western blot analysis.
Ijms 19 00127 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lai, S.-W.; Huang, B.-R.; Liu, Y.-S.; Lin, H.-Y.; Chen, C.-C.; Tsai, C.-F.; Lu, D.-Y.; Lin, C. Differential Characterization of Temozolomide-Resistant Human Glioma Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010127

AMA Style

Lai S-W, Huang B-R, Liu Y-S, Lin H-Y, Chen C-C, Tsai C-F, Lu D-Y, Lin C. Differential Characterization of Temozolomide-Resistant Human Glioma Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(1):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lai, Sheng-Wei, Bor-Ren Huang, Yu-Shu Liu, Hsiao-Yun Lin, Chun-Chuan Chen, Cheng-Fang Tsai, Dah-Yuu Lu, and Chingju Lin. 2018. "Differential Characterization of Temozolomide-Resistant Human Glioma Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 1: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop