Next Article in Journal
Oenocarpus bacaba and Oenocarpus bataua Leaflets and Roots: A New Source of Antioxidant Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Hypoxia Potentiates Anabolic Effects of Exogenous Hyaluronic Acid in Rat Articular Cartilage
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Interactions of CPP–ACP with Saliva
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 7
10.3390/ijms17070988
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The X-ray Structures of Six Octameric RNA Duplexes in the Presence of Different Di- and Trivalent Cations

by
Michelle F. Schaffer
1,
Guanya Peng
2,
Bernhard Spingler
1,
Joachim Schnabl
1,
Meitian Wang
2,
Vincent Olieric
2 and
Roland K. O. Sigel
1,*
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, Zürich CH-8057, Switzerland
2
Swiss Light Source, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen CH-5232, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(7), 988; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17070988
Submission received: 6 May 2016 / Revised: 10 June 2016 / Accepted: 15 June 2016 / Published: 27 June 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Bioinorganic Chemistry and Selected Papers from 13th ISABC)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Due to the polyanionic nature of RNA, the principles of charge neutralization and electrostatic condensation require that cations help to overcome the repulsive forces in order for RNA to adopt a three-dimensional structure. A precise structural knowledge of RNA-metal ion interactions is crucial to understand the mechanism of metal ions in the catalytic or regulatory activity of RNA. We solved the crystal structure of an octameric RNA duplex in the presence of the di- and trivalent metal ions Ca2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Cu2+, Sr2+, and Tb3+. The detailed investigation reveals a unique innersphere interaction to uracil and extends the knowledge of the influence of metal ions for conformational changes in RNA structure. Furthermore, we could demonstrate that an accurate localization of the metal ions in the X-ray structures require the consideration of several crystallographic and geometrical parameters as well as the anomalous difference map.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal ions play a crucial role in the folding of RNA and its catalytic mechanism, which are central in RNA biology. Folded RNA is involved in almost every aspect of cellular metabolism, including protein synthesis, RNA splicing, catalysis, and gene regulation [1,2,3,4], which is possible due to the multifunctional nature of RNA [3]. Cations influence the folding pathway by bringing together unfolded molecules, promoting the formation of secondary structures, stabilizing intermediate structures, and by maintaining the final native structure [3,5,6].
Nucleic acids, with their negative charge, are excellent targets for metal ions and metal-containing compounds. Most of the metal ions interact non-covalently with RNA, for example by electrostatic attraction, outersphere binding via hydrogen bonds, π–π interactions between a ligand of the metal complex and the nucleobases, or shape selective binding to the grooves [7,8]. A second type of binding, called innersphere binding, occurs directly between a metal ion and atoms of the RNA [9]. The MINAS (Metal Ions in Nucleic AcidS) database [10] allows searching for any specific metal binding sites found in nucleic acids and it distinguishes between outer- and innersphere coordination.
There is no ideal spectroscopic or biochemical method that provides in a single experiment details of metal ion occupation sites, specific ligands environment, and structural response of nucleic acids to cations. Biochemical and chemical methods predict metal ion binding sites and their involvement in catalytic activities of RNA, but this requires either RNA modification or cleavage, or the exchange of the natural cofactor by another metal ion [11,12,13]. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) indicates metal position by monitoring changes in chemical shifts of different nuclei upon the addition of metal ions and provides information on dynamic ion-RNA interactions in solution [14,15,16]. Another biophysical approach is Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (EPR); it is often used to obtain information about coordination environments, but limited to spectroscopic active species [17,18,19,20]. Raman spectroscopy has been used to investigate metal ion binding to the nucleic acid backbone [21]. Selective metal ion excitation by different incident synchrotron radiation in X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) helps to identify metal ion occupancies and gives structural information, but it requires that the metal ion is tightly bound [22].
X-ray crystallography is an excellent method to locate metal ions precisely. Nevertheless, small molecules and metal ions are often misinterpreted in macromolecular structures if only parameters as distances, coordination numbers, B-factors, and valence are verified. A recent study reported that around 10% of the metal ion binding sites in macromolecular structures are problematic and over 30% cannot be identified with sufficient evidence. The CheckMyMetal web server [23] uses eight parameters to evaluate the consistency, the valence, and coordination sphere of each metal ion binding sites. However, there are some limitations in using this webserver for π-backbonding, sites with an asymmetrical ligand arrangement, and for metal ions with more than one oxidation state.
In a previous study 13 different metal ions were localized in two 23-nucleotide long subtypes of the RNA dimerization initiation site (DIS) in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 RNA genome. Despite similar sequences the two structures showed different metal preferences and binding sites [24]. We extend the knowledge of this study by describing for the first time a Cu2+ binding site and an uncommon interaction of most tested metal ions to O4 of uracil in an octameric RNA duplex. From the crystal structure in the presence of Ca2+ we could collect a high quality and redundant data set to get sufficient anomalous signal to solve the crystal with native-SAD (single-wavelength anomalous diffraction). Furthermore, five octameric RNA crystal structures were solved with metal ions appearing less relevant in the context of nucleic acid binding, although they are often applied as chemical probes in nucleic acid biochemistry, as crystallization agents, or as Mg2+-mimicking atoms. Therefore, it was important to determine the sites of metal ion binding with confidence, which was achieved by collecting sufficient anomalous signals of four metal ions at different wavelengths together with careful inspection of the B-factor, valence bond parameter [25], and metal ligand distance.

2. Results

2.1. Overall Structure

In order to investigate the influence of metal ions on RNA structure, six octameric RNA duplex structures were solved in the presence of different metal ions. The RNA forms a continuous helix throughout the lattice by end-to-end stacking of the asymmetric unit (Figure 1), as it is often seen in crystal structures of nucleic acids to maximize the energy of the base-stacking [26]. Despite crystallized structures from solutions containing different metal ions, no particular structural changes were observed of the octameric RNA duplex (Figure 1). The isomorphous structures showed the characteristics of the A-form helix. However, comparison with a calculated “ideal” A-RNA duplex in solution reveals that the RNA duplex in the presence of the metal ions is more compressed and twisted (Figure 1). Quantitative data from the analysis of the three-dimensional structure by using the program 3DNA [27] confirmed these observations. In the presence of metal ions the values for the helical rise and the major groove width of the RNA are smaller, whereas the helical twist is bigger (Table 1). The compaction is particularly visible at the first nucleobases of the strand, which are more out-of-plane twisted to each other than in the “ideal” octameric RNA, and additionally hydrogen bond formation from U1O5′ to OP2 of C2 of the other strand is observed (Figure 1b). In addition, the quantitative analysis reveals that the structures in the presence of Mn2+, Sr2+, and Tb3+ have a slightly bigger major groove width (Table 1). This could be either due to the bigger ionic radius or that they are less effective in compensating the electrostatic repulsion.

2.2. Careful Examination of the Tested Metal Ions

The first crystal structure solved by native-SAD [29,30] was co-crystallized with Ca2+. Three of the other RNA crystals were grown in the presence of calcium(II) and afterwards soaked in solutions containing either Mn2+, Cu2+, or Tb3+. We measured all solved crystal structures at the corresponding X-ray absorption edge to get a strong anomalous signal. We could thereby unambiguously localize the ions by calculating anomalous difference maps in various resolution ranges. Further we verified that the B-factor of the metal and the environment are in the same range and we considered the distance and coordination to surrounding waters (Table 2).
In every solved octameric structure one cation is located in the center of the major groove (Figure 2). The other metal ion is bound in an innersphere arrangement to the phosphate oxygen of guanine and further linked to neighboring asymmetric units in the crystal (Figure 3). We assume that the metal ion in the central part of the major groove of the duplex and the one sitting at the phosphate backbone have an effect on the compaction of the octameric RNA by compensating for the negative charge, which is generated through the approach of the two phosphate backbones in the center. In the RNA structure that was soaked in copper(II), the Ca2+ at the phosphate backbone is not replaced by Cu2+, which demonstrates the strong preference of Ca2+ for the phosphate oxygens.
Figure 2 shows that Tb3+ and Mn2+ occupy slightly different sites in the center of the RNA. Tb3+ is located towards the phosphate backbone and Mn2+ is closer to guanine, a preference which is observed in other macromolecules too [10,31]. There are additional ion binding sites in the presence of Mn2+, Co2+, and Cu2+.

2.3. Comparison of Observed Metal Ion RNA Interaction to Other Macromolecules as Suggested by the MINAS Database

In addition to the innersphere binding to the phosphate oxygen of guanine, there is an uncommon innersphere binding to O4 of uracil by Ca2+, Co2+, and Cu2+ (Figure 4 and Table 2). While inner-sphere binding (e.g., to O6 of guanine [32]) is known, to the best of our knowledge innersphere binding to uracil O4 is here observed for the first time with Cu2+, compared to other macromolecules deposited in the protein databank (PDB) [33]. Outersphere binding to O6 of guanine is observed for all tested cations, except for Tb3+. In other macromolecules this interaction is frequently found for Mn2+ and Co2+, as suggested by the MINAS database [10]. Our study also confirms the preference of Tb3+, Ca2+, and Sr2+ to phosphate oxygens, as well as Co2+ and Cu2+ coordination to N7 of guanine [10,31], although in an outer-sphere manner in this octameric RNA duplex (Table 2).

2.4. Is There Cu2+ or Ca2+ in the Copper(II) Soaked Structure?

Although we observe a strong anomalous signal in the central part of the major groove at the absorption edge of Cu2+, the unusual elongated bond lengths to the coordinating waters [34,35] and the valence bond parameter [25] do not suggest that only Cu2+ is located at this position (Table 2). Therefore we try to quantitatively demonstrate the position of Cu2+ by integrating the area of the anomalous difference map. The occupancy of the strong anomalous scatterer Cu2+ relative to phosphorus, for which we assume 100% occupancy, was then calculated. The occupancy value for the anomalous difference map in Table 2 corresponds to the observed value from the electron density map and therefore confirms the position of Cu2+ at this site. The results indicate that the site is not fully occupied by Cu2+ and that in some structures Ca2+, instead of Cu2+, must be present (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

3.1. Structural Changes Are Independent of the Nature of the Cations

The more compact form of the solved RNA structures (Figure 1b and Table 2) clearly demonstrates the effects of di- and trivalent cations on RNA conformational changes, necessary for the catalytic activity in ribozymes or regulatory functions in riboswitches [36,37]. As we could not observe any conformational difference of the octameric RNA structures in the presence of different metal ions (Figure 1a), we assume that the specific position and orientation of the metal ions tend to be the determining factor for a fully active RNA rather than the nature of the metal ions. Hence, in RNA folding the choice of metal depends not only on physiochemical properties, but also on its abundance and availability. As in vitro evolution studies with the Tetrahymena group I and allosteric ribozymes in different metal ion environments demonstrate [38,39], RNA is even able to selectively adopt a metal ion.

3.2. Predominant Localization of All Tested Metal Ions in the Phosphate Backbone and in the Central Major Groove

The results propose that at least two metal ions are needed for structural changes and compensation of negative charges. The two negatively charged phosphate backbones approach each other at the major groove edge of the RNA duplex. This explains the localization of the metal ion at this specific position. Another preferred position is at the phosphate backbone, a position which is frequently reported in nucleic acids [10,40]. Different metal ions that occupy the same site in different crystal structures were already observed in previous studies [41,42,43,44]. Hence, crystallization buffers can also influence the metal ion binding sites and the occupancy, which should be considered when the position of the metal is related to functional activity of RNA.
Additional cations in the octameric RNA that are located at specific sites are Mn2+, Cu2+, and Co2+. They have smaller ionic radii compared to the other tested metal ions and are probably less sterically hindered to be in a closer position to the RNA duplex. Further, an additional Ca2+ is found at the phosphate backbone, reflecting the preference of the bigger-sized Ca2+ for this position [10].
Even if it is difficult to comment on the stabilities, as the resolution and the occupancy of the metal ion varies, we might observe a trend of “good” and “bad” binders, which corresponds to the Irving–Williams series [45,46]. Cu2+, Co2+, and Mn2+ seem to favor binding to the nucleobases, in contrast to Sr2+ or Ca2+ (Table 1). The dominant localization of Ca2+ at phosphate groups corresponds to reported increased stability constants for Ca2+ binding to the phosphodiester bridge [31].
Tb3+ and Mn2+ do not occupy the same central position observed for the other cations. As expected from other studies, Tb3+ is coordinated to phosphate oxygen atoms. Tb3+ competes with Mg2+ binding sites [47,48], hence the position of terbium(III) could suggest a possible Mg2+ binding site. Mg2+ is the most abundant metal ion in macromolecular structures [3,10]. However, we assume that Mg2+ is not required for the compact form of the octameric RNA structure. Mg2+ ions should be present in the case of the structure in the presence of Sr2+ and Co2+, but no specific structural change is seen compared to the other solved structures.

3.3. Particular Innersphere Binding of Co2+, Cu2+, and Ca2+ to O4 of Uracil

Innersphere binding to O4 of uracil is infrequent in other macromolecular structures, which is not surprising as uracil has basically no M2+ affinity, except if N3H is deprotonated [31,49]. There has been one case found for Co2+ in the crystal structure of the hammerhead ribozymes close to the cleavage site [50]. It was reported that Co2+ leads to higher in vitro cleavage rates than Mg2+ [51], however, there is no evidence that the localization of the Co2+ to this uracil O4 is the decisive factor.
Unexpectedly the coordination number of the central metal ion that undergoes this innersphere binding is seven, instead of six. However, transition metal ions are often flexible in both coordination number and geometry [52]. We assume that the compact conformation of the RNA squeezes the ligands and the surrounding water to close space in such a way that the correct geometry cannot be maintained. The compact conformation is either induced by the cations themselves, which counteract the negative charge, or it could be that the crystal packaging effects lead to structural changes in the RNA.

3.4. Mixed State Explains the Elongated Bond Length for the Copper(II) Soaked Crystal Structure

We found in the octameric RNA duplex a unique innersphere interaction of Cu2+ to O4 of uracil. Although copper is the third most abundant transition metal in the body and in the brain [9], interactions of copper(II) with nucleic acids are unusual [10], and to the best of our knowledge no RNA structure associated with copper has been deposited in the PDB [33].
The anomalous difference map clearly indicates the presence of copper(II) at this position. This was quantitatively demonstrated by integrating the anomalous difference map and by determining the occupancy of Cu2+ relative to the phosphates. However, the quantification of the anomalous signal also indicates that the position is not completely occupied by Cu2+. Hence, we propose a mixed state of Ca2+ with Cu2+ which was used for soaking (Figure 5).

4. Methods

4.1. RNA Synthesis and Purification

Chemically synthesized and desalted RNA oligonucleotides with the sequence 5′-UCGUACGA were purchased from Microsynth, Switzerland in a quantity of 2 μmol and purified by denaturing 20% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) following standard procedures [53]. The excised gel slices were crushed and soaked twice in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) and 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.5). The supernatant was collected and precipitated by the addition of 100% EtOH and 50 mM NaCl. The RNA was desalted and concentrated to 1.2 mM.

4.2. RNA Crystallization and Soaking

RNA (0.6 mM) was annealed for 1 min at 50 °C in water and cooled to room temperature. Crystals were grown by the hanging drop vapor diffusion method in a 1:1 mixture of RNA and reservoir solution. The colorless needle-shaped crystals in the presence of Ca2+ grew after two days in a solution consisting of 200 mM CaCl2, 28% PEG 400, 2 mM spermine, and 50 mM hepes sodium buffer (pH 7.5). Soaking was done in reservoir solutions with 100 mM MnCl2, 2 mM TbCl3, or 20 mM CuCl2, instead of CaCl2, for 24 h. The conditions for the two co-crystallized RNA were 2 mM CoCl2, 20 mM MgSO4, 25% MPD, 0.5 mM spermine, and 50 mM potassium cacodylate (pH 6.0) (for the Co2+ crystals) and 200 mM SrCl2, 200 mM ammonium acetate, 10 mM magnesium acetate, 28% polyethylene glycol (PEG) 8000, and 50 mM sodium cacodylate pH 6.5 (for the Sr2+ crystals). Crystals were looped in cryosolution containing reservoir solution with 25% glycerol and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen.

4.3. Data Collection and Structure Determination

Single crystal datasets were collected by beamline X06DA Swiss Light Source (Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland) at 100 K with a PILATUS 2M-F detector (Dectris Ltd., Baden-Daettwil, Switzerland). Data were processed with XDS [54] and scaled with AIMLESS [55,56]. Highly redundant fine-φ sliced data [57] were collected at a single-wavelength with a multi-axis goniometer PRIGo (Table 3). The crystal in the presence of Ca2+ was solved with native-SAD at a wavelength of 1.61 Å (List 1). The long needle-shaped crystals were well-suited for measuring at different positions to prevent radiation damage and to get highly redundant data of high quality. All the other crystal structures were solved by molecular replacement using MOLREP [55]. Refinement cycles were performed in PHENIX [58] and molecular graphics and analyses were performed with the UCSF Chimera package [59]. Further details concerning data collection, phasing, and refinement are reported in Table 3 and List 1.
The ideal A-RNA duplex was predicted with the web-accessible tool RNAComposer [28].
  • List 1. Statistics of sub-structure determination and phasing (Ca2+ data).
    SHELXD CCweak (%)/CCall (%) (for the top solution)48.8/29.3
    SHELXD CFOM (for the top solution)78.1
    SHELXD PATFOM (for the top solution)18.6
    Number of correct sites (for the top solution)14
    SHELXE CC (%)69.20
    SHELXE FOM0.656
    PHASER EP FOM0.697
    Map CC (%) (DM map against the map calculated from the refined model)82.4

4.4. Localization of Metal Ions

The identity of metal ions with sufficient anomalous scattering was confirmed by calculating an anomalous difference map in various resolution ranges with PHENIX [58]. The M–O distances to water were compared to data reported by Shannon [34,35]. The cutoff values for innersphere binding were set to 2.5 Å after the definition of the MINAS database [10], except for Sr2+, as the proposed M-O distance was 2.62 Å due to the longer ionic radii. For outersphere binding a maximum distance of 3.2 Å from water to RNA was set. The bond valence parameter as described in [25] is calculated for each observed metal-ligand distance Ri by vi = ∑exp((R0 − Ri)/b), where R0 is a constant describing ideal distance, if the bond valence is 1, and b is an empirical constant. Both values are reported in [60]. The bond valence model was only employed for metal ion positions with an occupancy higher than 0.5.
For quantification of the anomalous signal of Cu2+ the anomalous difference map was integrated with Mapman [61] to add up the density inside a sphere of 2 Å around each atom. The f′′ value of Cu2+ and P were used to determine the ratio of their anomalous signals at the measured wavelength of 1.37 Å. The integrated value for phosphorus was then multiplied by this factor. For phosphorus, a 100% occupancy was assumed to calculate the relative occupancy for Cu2+.

5. Conclusions

Here we describe a detailed study of six different metal ions coordinating to a short RNA duplex. The cations have a rather strong influence on RNA structure, although none of the metal ions employed shows a specific individual structural influence. Different parameters were considered to carefully assign the positions of the individual metal ions, yielding two prevalent positions in the octameric RNA duplex. The first is coordinated to the phosphate backbone, the second cation binds in the major groove of the RNA, interacting by a particular innersphere coordination to O4 of uracil in the presence of Ca2+, Co2+, and Cu2+.
Finally, this study demonstrates the importance of considering several parameters when assigning metal ion positions in X-ray structures. Even when there is a strong anomalous signal present, we have to inspect other geometrical and crystallographic parameters for an accurate localization. On the other hand, geometrical consideration without examining the anomalous signal or other crystallographic parameters may lead to wrong interpretations as the geometry could be distorted by structural constraints of the RNA due to the metal ions or crystal packaging effects.

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Projects 124834 and 129584 to Roland K. O. Sigel and Vincent Olieric), by the European Research Council (ERC starting grant MIRNA to Roland K. O. Sigel), and the University of Zurich is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to Céline Stutz-Ducommun and Beat Blattmann of the Protein Crystallization Center (PCC@UZH) for excellent support during the crystallization trials. We also thank Melanie Rohner for helpful discussions and advices.

Author Contributions

Michelle F. Schaffer, Joachim Schnabl, and Roland K. O. Sigel designed the research. Michelle F. Schaffer, Joachim Schnabl, and Guanya Peng measured the crystals and together with Bernhard Spingler, Vincent Olieric, and Meitian Wang solved the structures and analyzed the data. Michelle F. Schaffer and Roland K. O. Sigel wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Protein Data Bank Accession Codes

The atomic coordinates are available at the RCSB Protein Data Bank under the accession code 4U3L, 4U3R, 4U78, 4U3O, 4U3P, and 4U47.

References

  1. Trappl, K.; Polacek, N. The ribosome: A molecular machine powered by RNA. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2011, 9, 253–275. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Freisinger, E.; Sigel, R.K.O. From nucleotides to ribozymes—A comparison of their metal ion binding properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2007, 251, 1834–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Pyle, A.M. Metal ions in the structure and function of RNA. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 7, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ferre-D’Amare, A.R.; Winkler, W.C. The roles of metal ions in regulation by riboswitches. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2011, 9, 141–173. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Scott, W.G. RNA structure, metal ions, and catalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1999, 3, 705–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Draper, D.E.; Grilley, D.; Soto, A.M. Ions and RNA folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. 2005, 34, 221–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lippert, B. Coordinative bond formation between metal ions and nucleic acid base. In Nucleic Acid-Metal Ion Interactions. RSC Biomolecular Science; Hud, N.V., Ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry: Cambridge, UK, 2009; pp. 39–74. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lipfert, J.; Doniach, S.; Das, R.; Herschlag, D. Understanding nucleic acid-ion interactions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2014, 83, 813–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Auffinger, P.; Grover, N.; Westhof, E. Metal ion binding to RNA. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2011, 9, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Schnabl, J.; Suter, P.; Sigel, R.K.O. MINAS—A database of Metal Ions in Nucleic Acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D434–D438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Erat, M.C.; Sigel, R.K.O. Divalent metal ions tune the self-splicing reaction of the yeast mitochondrial group II intron Sc.ai5γ. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 13, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pechlaner, M.; Sigel, R.K.O. Characterization of Metal Ion-Nucleic Acid Interactions in Solution. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2012, 10, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Weinstein, L.B.; Jones, B.C.; Cosstick, R.; Cech, T.R. A second catalytic metal ion in group I ribozyme. Nature 1997, 388, 805–808. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Gonzalez, R.L.; Tinoco, I. Identification and characterization of metal ion binding sites in RNA. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 338, 421–443. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Feigon, J.; Butcher, S.E.; Finger, L.D.; Hud, N.V. Solution nuclear magnetic resonance probing of cation binding sites on nucleic acids. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 338, 400–420. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Donghi, D.; Sigel, R.K.O. Metal ion–RNA interactions studied via multinuclear NMR. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 848, 253–273. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Santangelo, M.G.; Medina-Molner, A.; Schweiger, A.; Mitrikas, G.; Spingler, B. Structural analysis of Cu(II) ligation to the 5′-GMP nucleotide by pulse EPR spectroscopy. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 12, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Santangelo, M.G.; Antoni, P.M.; Spingler, B.; Jeschke, G. Can copper(II) mediate Hoogsteen base-pairing in a left-handed DNA duplex? A pulse EPR study. ChemPhysChem 2010, 11, 599–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Qin, P.Z.; Dieckmann, T. Application of NMR and EPR methods to the study of RNA. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2004, 14, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. DeRose, V.J. Metal ion binding to catalytic RNA molecules. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 13, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duguid, J.; Bloomfield, V.A.; Benevides, J.; Thomas, G.J. Raman spectroscopy of DNA-metal complexes. I. Interactions and conformational effects of the divalent cations: Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Pd, and Cd. Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 1916–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ascone, I.; Strange, R. Biological X-ray absorption spectroscopy and metalloproteomics. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 2009, 16, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zheng, H.; Chordia, M.D.; Cooper, D.R.; Chruszcz, M.; Müller, P.; Sheldrick, G.M.; Minor, W. Validation of metal-binding sites in macromolecular structures with the CheckMyMetal web server. Nat. Protoc. 2013, 9, 156–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ennifar, E.; Walter, P.; Dumas, P. A crystallographic study of the binding of 13 metal ions to two related RNA duplexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 2671–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Brown, I.D. Recent developments in the methods and applications of the bond valence model. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 6858–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shah, S.A.; Brunger, A.T. The 1.8 Å crystal structure of a statically disordered 17 base-pair RNA duplex: Principles of RNA crystal packing and its effect on nucleic acid structure. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 1577–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lu, X.J.; Olson, W.K. 3DNA: A software package for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003, 31, 5108–5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Popenda, M.; Szachniuk, M.; Antczak, M.; Purzycka, K.J.; Lukasiak, P.; Bartol, N.; Blazewicz, J.; Adamiak, R.W. Automated 3D structure composition for large RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dauter, Z.; Adamiak, D.A. Anomalous signal of phosphorus used for phasing DNA oligomer: Importance of data redundancy. Acta Crystallogr. D 2001, 57, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Luo, Z.; Dauter, M.; Dauter, Z. Phosphates in the Z-DNA dodecamer are flexible, but their P-SAD signal is sufficient for structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 2014, 70, 1790–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sigel, R.K.O.; Sigel, H. A stability concept for metal ion coordination to single-stranded nucleic acids and affinities of individual sites. Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 974–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Rohner, M.; Medina-Molner, A.; Spingler, B. N,N,O, and N,O,N meridional cis coordination of two guanines to copper(II) by d(CGCGCG)2. Inorg. Chem. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Shannon, R.D.; Prewitt, C.T. Effective ionic radii in oxides and fluorides. Acta Crystallogr. B 1969, 25, 925–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic-radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sigel, R.K.O. Group II intron Ribozymes and metal ions—A delicate relationship. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 12, 2281–2292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Roth, A.; Breaker, R.R. The structural and functional diversity of metabolite-binding riboswitches. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2009, 78, 305–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Lehman, N.; Joyce, G.F. Evolution in vitro of an RNA enzyme with altered metal dependence. Nature 1993, 361, 182–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zivarts, M.; Liu, Y.; Breaker, R.R. Engineered allosteric ribozymes that respond to specific divalent metal ions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 622–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sigel, H.; Griesser, R. Nucleoside 5′-triphosphates: Self-association, acid-base, and metal ion-binding properties in solution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 875–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shi, H.; Moore, P.B. The crystal structure of yeast phenylalanine tRNA at 1.93 Å resolution: A classic structure revisited. RNA 2000, 6, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Scott, W.G.; Finch, J.T.; Klug, A. The crystal structure of an all-RNA hammerhead ribozyme: A proposed mechanism for RNA catalytic cleavage. Cell 1995, 81, 991–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Scott, W.G.; Murray, J.B.; Arnold, J.R.; Stoddard, B.L.; Klug, A. Capturing the structure of a catalytic RNA intermediate: The hammerhead ribozyme. Science 1996, 274, 2065–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Marcia, M.; Pyle, A.M. Principles of ion recognition in RNA: Insights from the group II intron structures. RNA 2014, 20, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Irving, H.; Williams, R.J.P. The stability of transition-metal complexes. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 320, 3192–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schnabl, J.; Sigel, R.K.O. Controlling ribozyme activity by metal ions. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Sigel, R.K.O.; Vaidya, A.; Pyle, A.M. Metal ion binding sites in a group II intron core. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7, 1111–1116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Cate, J.H.; Doudna, J.A. Metal-binding sites in the major groove of a large ribozyme domain. Structure 1996, 4, 1221–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Knobloch, B.; Linert, W.; Sigel, H. Metal ion-binding properties of (N3)-deprotonated uridine, thymidine, and related pyrimidine nucleosides in aqueous solution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 7459–7464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dunham, C.M.; Murray, J.B.; Scott, W.G. A helical twist-induced conformational switch activates cleavage in the hammerhead ribozyme. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 332, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dahm, S.C.; Uhlenbeck, O.C. Role of divalent metal ions in the hammerhead RNA cleavage reaction. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 9464–9469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Carter, J.C.; Holbrook, A.R. Encyclopedia of Life Science, 1st ed.; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  53. Gallo, S.; Furler, M.; Sigel, R.K.O. In vitro transcription and purification of RNAs of different size. Chimia 2005, 59, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kabsch, W.  XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 2010, 66, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Potterton, E.; Briggs, P.; Turkenburg, M.; Dodson, E. A graphical user interface to the CCP4 program suite. Acta Crystallogr. D 2003, 59, 1131–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Evans, P.R.; Murshudov, G.N. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Cristallogr. D 2013, 69, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mueller, M.; Wang, M.; Schulze-Briese, C. Optimal fine phi-slicing for single-photon-counting pixel detectors. Acta Crystallogr. D 2012, 68, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Adams, P.D.; Afonine, P.V.; Bunkóczi, G.; Chen, V.B.; Davis, I.W.; Echols, N.; Headd, J.J.; Hung, L.W.; Kapral, G.J.; Grosse-Kunstleve, R.W.; et al. PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 2010, 66, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Pettersen, E.F.; Goddard, T.D.; Huang, C.C.; Couch, G.S.; Greenblatt, D.M.; Meng, E.C.; Ferrin, T.E. UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Shields, G.P.; Raithby, P.R.; Allen, F.H.; Motherwell, W.D.S. The assignment and validation of metal oxidation states in the Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr. B 2000, 56, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Kleywegt, G.J.; Jones, T.A. xdlMAPMAN and xdlDATAMAN—Programs for reformatting, analysis and manipulation of biomacromolecular electron-density maps and reflection data sets. Acta Crystallogr. D 1996, 52, 826–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 00988 g001 1024
Figure 1. Effects of the nature of the metal ion on RNA structure. (a) Overlay of all octameric RNA crystal structures in the presence of Ca2+ (green), Mn2+ (purple), Sr2+ (grey), Tb3+ (yellow), Cu2+ (brown), and Co2+ (pink); (b) Calculated, energy-minimized octameric A-RNA duplex (grey) in solution compared to the X-ray structure solved in the presence of Ca2+ (red). The energy-minimized octameric A-RNA duplex was calculated with the program RNAComposer [28]; (c) end-on-end stacking of individual octamers (shown in three different colors) in the crystal structure.
Figure 1. Effects of the nature of the metal ion on RNA structure. (a) Overlay of all octameric RNA crystal structures in the presence of Ca2+ (green), Mn2+ (purple), Sr2+ (grey), Tb3+ (yellow), Cu2+ (brown), and Co2+ (pink); (b) Calculated, energy-minimized octameric A-RNA duplex (grey) in solution compared to the X-ray structure solved in the presence of Ca2+ (red). The energy-minimized octameric A-RNA duplex was calculated with the program RNAComposer [28]; (c) end-on-end stacking of individual octamers (shown in three different colors) in the crystal structure.
Ijms 17 00988 g001
Ijms 17 00988 g002 1024
Figure 2. Positions of the metal ions found in different crystal structures of the octameric RNA duplex. The atoms of all RNA strand structures are superimposed, although the RNA duplex shown is the one solved in the presence of Ca2+, whereas the other structures are hidden.
Figure 2. Positions of the metal ions found in different crystal structures of the octameric RNA duplex. The atoms of all RNA strand structures are superimposed, although the RNA duplex shown is the one solved in the presence of Ca2+, whereas the other structures are hidden.
Ijms 17 00988 g002
Ijms 17 00988 g003 1024
Figure 3. Representative illustration of Ca2+ (green sphere) connecting the three asymmetric units (in grey, light blue, and pink) by phosphate coordination. Coordinated water molecules are shown in red.
Figure 3. Representative illustration of Ca2+ (green sphere) connecting the three asymmetric units (in grey, light blue, and pink) by phosphate coordination. Coordinated water molecules are shown in red.
Ijms 17 00988 g003
Ijms 17 00988 g004 1024
Figure 4. The unique innersphere interaction of Co2+ (pink sphere) to O4 of uracil with six additional coordinated water molecules (red spheres).
Figure 4. The unique innersphere interaction of Co2+ (pink sphere) to O4 of uracil with six additional coordinated water molecules (red spheres).
Ijms 17 00988 g004
Ijms 17 00988 g005 1024
Figure 5. Representative model for the co-existence of Ca2+ and Cu2+. The RNA crystal structure demonstrates the mixed state of Ca2+ (green) and Cu2+ (brown) in the central part of the major groove. The anomalous difference map for Cu2+ shown as a pink mesh contours the atoms at the 4σ level and the electron density map shown as blue meshes contours the atoms at the 3σ level. Coordinated water molecules are shown as red spheres.
Figure 5. Representative model for the co-existence of Ca2+ and Cu2+. The RNA crystal structure demonstrates the mixed state of Ca2+ (green) and Cu2+ (brown) in the central part of the major groove. The anomalous difference map for Cu2+ shown as a pink mesh contours the atoms at the 4σ level and the electron density map shown as blue meshes contours the atoms at the 3σ level. Coordinated water molecules are shown as red spheres.
Ijms 17 00988 g005
Table
Table 1. Selected helical parameters calculated with the program X3DNA [27]. The average values of all local base-pair values are provided together with the standard deviation as defined by the program X3DNA (in parentheses).
Table 1. Selected helical parameters calculated with the program X3DNA [27]. The average values of all local base-pair values are provided together with the standard deviation as defined by the program X3DNA (in parentheses).
Calculated 8mer DuplexCa2+Mn2+Co2+Cu2+Sr2+Tb3+
Helical rise (Å)2.80 (0.03)2.4 (0.57)2.59 (0.47)2.41 (0.55)2.43 (0.54)2.58 (0.36)2.56 (0.42)
Helical twist (°)16.0 (0.9)36.0 (2.7)35.0 (2.4)35.6 (2.9)35.8 (3.1)35.3 (1.8)35.7 (1.7)
Major groove width (Å)12.75.47.95.55.67.76.3
Table
Table 2. Coordination of metal ions in the octameric RNA and comparison of observed RNA metal ion interactions to frequency reported in the MINAS database (Metal Ions in Nucleic AcidS) [10].
Table 2. Coordination of metal ions in the octameric RNA and comparison of observed RNA metal ion interactions to frequency reported in the MINAS database (Metal Ions in Nucleic AcidS) [10].
Metal IDCationInner Sphere Ligand aDistance (Å)OccupancyB-FactorOuter Sphere Ligand bValence c% in MINAS
1Ca/C1Ca2+ 1.019.4 2.2
O4 4U/A2.391.018.1 0.7
O 2HOH/D2.431.021.7N7 3G/A 3.9
O 3HOH/D2.451.021.5
O 14HOH/D2.391.021.5O6 3G/A 2.9
O 15HOH/D2.361.023.6
O 16HOH/D2.351.018.4O6 3G/B 2.9
O 17HOH/D2.41.018.1
1Ca/E1Ca2+ 0.421.7
O2′/5 A/B2.861.022.6 2.1
O2′/5 A/B d2.861.022.6 2.1
O2′/5 A/B d2.861.022.6 2.1
1Ca/F1Ca2+ 1.018.3 1.8
OP1 7G/A2.341.021.0 18.7
OP1 7G/A d2.341.021.0 18.7
OP1 7G/A d2.341.021.0 18.7
O 4HOH/D2.521.026.1
O 4HOH/D d2.521.026.1
O 4HOH/D d2.521.026.1
1Cu/C1Cu2+ 0.4
0.46 e		19.1
O4 4U/A2.401.018.1 0.0 (Cu2+)
0.7 (Ca2+)
O 18HOH/D2.321.019.1O6 3G/A 10.3 (Cu2+)
2.9 (Ca2+)
O 22HOH/D2.301.018.3O6 3G/A 10.3 (Cu2+)
2.9 (Ca2+)
O 7HOH/D2.381.022.9
O 5HOH/D2.381.020.9N7 3G/A 4.8 (Cu2+)
3.9 (Ca2+)
O 2HOH/D2.311.021.0N4 2C/B 9.6 (Cu2+)
0.5 (Ca2+)
O 4HOH/D2.441.019.5
1Ca/F1Ca2+ 0.219.1
1Ca/G1Ca2+ 0.613.1 2.0
OP1 7G/A2.351.015.4 18.7
OP1 7G/A d2.351.015.4 18.7
OP1 7G/A d2.351.015.4 18.7
O 41HOH/D2.391.019.1
41HOH/D d2.391.019.1
41HOH/D d2.391.019.1
1Cu/C4Cu2+ 0.225.1 -
O 49HOH/D2.191.030.6N7 8A/B 1.4
O 47HOH/D2.221.034.2N6 8A/B 1.2
O 85HOH/D2.160.533.1
O 86HOH/D2.150.432.1
O 1HOH/E2.211.036.1
O 70HOH/D d2.111.0036.6
1Co/E1Co2+ 0.58.5 2.1
O4 4U/A2.421.014.4 3.9
O 1HOH/C2.131.012.8O6 3G/B 11.1
O 13HOH/C2.111.015.9O6 3G/A 11.1
O 4HOH/C2.101.015.5
O 6HOH/C2.111.020.6N7 3G/A 10.2
O 5HOH/C2.131.017.5
O 3HOH/C2.101.020.4
1Co/D2Co2+ 0.612.0 1.8
O 1HOH/C2.111.018.9
O 1HOH/C d2.111.018.9
O 1HOH/C d2.111.018.9
OP1 7G/A2.151.015.3 2.6
OP1 7G/A d2.151.015.3 2.6
OP1 7G/A d2.151.015.3 2.6
1Co/E2Co2+ 0.312.5
O 81HOH/C2.101.023.7N7 7G/A 10.2
O 37HOH/C2.071.025.3
O 17HOH/C2.121.020.3OP2 6C/A 5.1
O 61HOH/C2.111.026.0
O 63HOH/C2.101.027.6
O 62HOH/C2.091.032.4
1Mn/C1Mn2+ 0.714.7 2.1
O 1HOH/F2.141.020.4
O 2HOH/F2.181.019.5O4 4U/A 3.3
O 3HOH/F2.081.016.5O6 3G/B 9.3
O 15HOH/F2.191.021.4N7 3G/B 8.0
O 16HOH/F2.311.018.4
O 17HOH/F2.211.022.9
1Mn/D1Mn2+ 0.614.0 2.5
O 7HOH/F2.171.018.9O6 7G/A 9.3
O 8HOH/F2.211.023.2
O 9HOH/F2.001.022.2
O 10HOH/F2.081.025.5
O 11HOH/F2.051.023.4
O 12HOH/F2.181.018.9N7 7G/A 8.0
1Mn/E1Mn2+ 0.415.3
O 13HOH/F2.101.025.9
O 14HOH/F2.071.023.1O6 7G/B 9.3
O 44HOH/F2.131.026.2N7 7G/B 8.0
O 45HOH/F2.061.030.6
O 37HOH/F d2.321.026.5
O 43HOH/F d2.231.026.2
1Mn/G1Mn2+ 0.722.2
OP1 7G/A2.591.028.4 4.6
OP1 7G/A d2.991.028.4 4.6
OP1 7G/A d2.271.028.4 4.6
1Sr/C2Sr2+ 0.628.5 1.4
O 1HOH/N2.521.033.6O4 4U/A 5.4
O 2HOH/Q2.611.042.5
O 3HOH/D2.491.036.3O6 3G/B 5.2
O 4HOH/D2.531.030.3O6 3G/A 5.2
O 6HOH/D2.611.035.92
O 7HOH/D2.621.038.4
1Sr/F1Sr2+ 0.535.3
OP1 7G/A3.201.033.9
OP1 7G/A d3.201.033.9
OP1 7G/A d3.201.033.9
1Tb/1Tb3+ 0.439.4
OP2 2C/A2.531.040.9 -
OP2 2C/B2.501.041.6 -
O 1HOH/2.341.045.0
O 14HOH/D2.301.045.1
O 19HOH/D2.551.046.6O5′/1 U/A 7.1
1Tb/E2Tb3+ 0.244.4
OP1 7G/A 1.041.8 -
OP1 7G/A d 1.041.8
OP1 7G/A d 1.041.8
a The cutoff values for innersphere binding were set to 2.5 Å, as defined in the MINAS database. For Sr2+ the cutoff value was set to 2.62 Å according the theoretically expected value; b after the definition of the MINAS database a maximum distance of 3.2 Å from H2O to RNA was set; c for atoms with low occupancy the valence bond parameter was not calculated; d symmetry-related atoms; e occupancy calculated from the anomalous signal.
Table
Table 3. Statistics of data collection and refinement of the octamer in the presence of the indicated divalent metal ions.
Table 3. Statistics of data collection and refinement of the octamer in the presence of the indicated divalent metal ions.
Ca2+Mn2+Co2+Cu2+Sr2+Tb3+
PDB Code4U3L4U3O4U3R4U784U3P4U47
Data collection
λ (Å)1.608101.600001.600001.374781.600001.60000
Exposure period (s)0.10.10.10.10.10.1
Oscillation range (°)0.250.10.10.10.10.1
Space groupH3H3H3H3H3H3
Unit cell parameters
a (Å)46.8846.3346.9746.8145.4846.51
b (Å)46.8846.3346.9746.8145.4846.51
c (Å)53.1558.0853.3953.3857.9856.63
Resolution range (Å)32.00–1.6823.16–1.832.34–1.7232.28–1.5032.58–1.8732.82–1.95
Number of reflections
Total69,34678,54835,809112,32335,16931,751
Unique472641404265686437283225
Completeness (%) a95.2 (77.60)95.74 (79.91)96.75 (84.68)98.39 (90.32)99.79 (97.96)96.82 (89.57)
(I)/(σ(I)) a58.00 (16.2)43.26 (12.06)14.60 (12.22)48.32 (4.56)34.84 (4.06)33.19 (5.35)
Average multiplicity14.7(4.9)19.0(11.4)8.4 (2.0)16.4 (5.0)9.4 (7.0)9.8 (9.0)
Rmeas a0.036 (0.076)0.059 (0.23)0.042 (0.044)0.041 (0.042)0.037 (0.48)0.052 (0.44)
CC1/2100 (97.7)100 (99.2)99.8 (82.4)99.9 (98.2)99.9 (98.2)99.8 (98.6)
Refinement
Rwork0.1870.1650.1650.1770.1800.172
Rfree0.2120.1750.1980.2060.2290.207
Root mean square deviations (r.m.s.d.) from target values
Bond lengths (Å)0.0050.0050.0020.0020.0040.004
Bond angle (Å)0.8900.9100.4000.4000.7400.780
Average B-factors (Å2)
Ligands24.516.610.920.332.441.8
RNA22.921.415.118.128.739.0
Solvent27.126.125.928.534.243.9
Number of RNA atoms b334334334334334334
Number of solvent molecules296587786437
a Statistics for the highest-resolution shell are shown in parentheses; b per asymmetric unit.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Schaffer, M.F.; Peng, G.; Spingler, B.; Schnabl, J.; Wang, M.; Olieric, V.; Sigel, R.K.O. The X-ray Structures of Six Octameric RNA Duplexes in the Presence of Different Di- and Trivalent Cations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17070988

AMA Style

Schaffer MF, Peng G, Spingler B, Schnabl J, Wang M, Olieric V, Sigel RKO. The X-ray Structures of Six Octameric RNA Duplexes in the Presence of Different Di- and Trivalent Cations. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(7):988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17070988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schaffer, Michelle F., Guanya Peng, Bernhard Spingler, Joachim Schnabl, Meitian Wang, Vincent Olieric, and Roland K. O. Sigel. 2016. "The X-ray Structures of Six Octameric RNA Duplexes in the Presence of Different Di- and Trivalent Cations" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 7: 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17070988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop