Next Article in Journal
Managing Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Special Focus in MicroRNA Gene Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Cells Derived from Human Breast Cancer Cells and Human Breast Epithelial Cells Exhibit Differential TLR4 and TLR9 Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms17050721
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of Acceptors with Suitable Frontier Molecular Orbitals to Match Donors via Substitutions on Perylene Diimide for Organic Solar Cells

by
Xiaoli Lv
1,
Zhuoxin Li
1,
Songyang Li
1,
Guoyou Luan
1,*,
Dadong Liang
1,
Shanshan Tang
1,* and
Ruifa Jin
2
1
College of Resource and Environmental Science, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118, China
2
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chifeng University, Chifeng 024000, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17(5), 721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050721
Submission received: 19 April 2016 / Revised: 3 May 2016 / Accepted: 5 May 2016 / Published: 13 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Chemistry, Theoretical and Computational Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A series of perylene diimide (PDI) derivatives have been investigated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) and the TD-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) levels to design solar cell acceptors with high performance in areas such as suitable frontier molecular orbital (FMO) energies to match oligo(thienylenevinylene) derivatives and improved charge transfer properties. The calculated results reveal that the substituents slightly affect the distribution patterns of FMOs for PDI-BI. The electron withdrawing group substituents decrease the FMO energies of PDI-BI, and the electron donating group substituents slightly affect the FMO energies of PDI-BI. The di-electron withdrawing group substituents can tune the FMOs of PDI-BI to be more suitable for the oligo(thienylenevinylene) derivatives. The electron withdrawing group substituents result in red shifts of absorption spectra and electron donating group substituents result in blue shifts for PDI-BI. The –CN substituent can improve the electron transport properties of PDI-BI. The –CH3 group in different positions slightly affects the electron transport properties of PDI-BI.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Organic solar cells (OSCs) with high power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) exceeding 10% have been fabricated [1]. Among them, organic small molecules as solar cell materials based on π-conjugate polymers are attractive because of their rapid energy payback time [2], low cost, flexibility, light weight, solution-based processing, and the capability to fabricate flexible large-area devices [3]. The PCEs of the OSCs have exceeded 11% when the conventional fullerene as the acceptors [4,5]. However, the fullerene and its derivative acceptors have several limitations, such as costly production, fixed band alignment, and limited optical absorption, which significantly prevent the development of new donor materials. Thus, developing and investigating novel acceptors has become a focus around the world. Up to now, many small molecule acceptors have been reported, such as 9,9′-bifluorenylidene [6,7], dicyan substituted quinacridone [8], diketopyrrolopyrrole derivatives [9,10], vinazene [11,12], fluoranthene-fused imide [13,14], naphthalene diimides [15,16], electron-deficient pentacenes [17], and perylene diimides (PDIs) [18,19,20,21]. Among the small molecule acceptors, PDI and its derivatives have attracted much attention in the past decade due to their superior optical and electric properties—for example, excellent chemical, photochemical, and thermal stabilities [22], high absorption (450 and 650 nm) [23], promising electron mobility [24,25,26], and excellent electron affinity [27]. Yao et al. obtained solar cells with 4.34% efficiency on the basis of PDI [21]. Nguyen et al. prepared the PDI bulk heterojunction solar cell [1]. Shin et al. obtained OSCs with a power conversion efficiency of 0.18% under AM 1.5 using PDI derivatives as acceptors [28]. Zhang et al. [29,30] and Tang et al. [31] deigned a series of PDI derivatives and calculated their properties.
Won Suk Shin et al. prepared some PDI derivatives, and molecule PDI-BI had suitable properties as a solar cell acceptor [28]. In this manuscript, in order to improve the performance of PDI-BI, we have designed various PDI-BI derivatives (Table 1), which have different functional groups, to find the most promising acceptors with suitable frontier molecular orbital energies (FMOs) to match the OSC donor oligo(thienylenevinylene) derivatives (X1 and X2, Figure 1) with favourable properties designated by Yong et al. [32]. Generally, the higher the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of the acceptor, the larger the open circuit voltage (Voc), because the difference in energy between the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy of the donor and LUMO of the acceptor is in direct proportion to the Voc. In addition, to ensure separation of charge, the differences between the LUMO energies of the donor and the acceptor should be greater than 0.30 eV [33]. Considering the fact that the substituent groups affect the molecular properties significantly, we designed two kinds of molecules (PDI-BI-1-26) to study the push (–CH3) and pull (–CN and –NO2) substituent groups effects. The density function theory (DFT) [34] has been used for evaluating a variety of ground state properties of these molecules, such as FMO, including HOMO and LUMO energies, and the HOMO–LUMO gaps (Eg). The optical properties (absorption spectra) of the designed molecules have been predicted by the time dependent DFT [35,36,37] approach (TD-DFT). The reorganization energy (λ) was also calculated. Additionally, we discussed the correlation between structures and properties of these molecules.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Frontier Molecular Orbitals

The electronic and optical properties of molecules are related to the values of FMOs and Eg. Thus, in order to gain insight into the influence of the optical and electronic properties, the distribution patterns of the FMOs for the designed molecules are studied, and the electronic density contours of the designed molecules in ground states are shown in Figure 2. The evaluations of HOMO and LUMO energies (EHOMO and ELOMO) for designed molecules are plotted in Figure 3 and listed in Table 2.
From Figure 2, one can see that the FMOs are spread over the entire molecule for the designed molecules. This indicates that there is great spatial overlap between the HOMO and LUMO, and the transition from HOMO to LUMO may lead to strong optical adsorption. As shown in Figure 3 and Table 2, the –CN and –NO2 groups in different substituent positions can decrease the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values of PDI-BI, except that –NO2 in 3 or 4-position increases the Eg value of PDI-BI (PDI-BI-11 and PDI-BI-12), and the deviations of EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values for molecules PDI-BI-1-12 are similar, respectivety. For molecules PDI-BI-1-8, the decrease of the EHOMO value is the largest when the –CN group is in the 3-position of PDI-BI. The decrease of the ELOMO value is the largest when the –CN group is in the 6 or 7-position of PDI-BI. The Eg value is the smallest when the –CN group is in the 6-position of PDI-BI. For molecules PDI-BI-9-12, the decrease of the EHOMO value is the largest when the –NO2 group is in the 3-position of PDI-BI. The decrease of the ELOMO value is the largest when the –NO2 group is in the 1-position of PDI-BI. The Eg value is the smallest when the –NO2 group is in the 2-position of PDI-BI. The di-CN, di-NO2, or –CN and –NO2 groups in different substituent positions can decrease the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values of PDI-BI, except that the –NO2 in 3 and 6-positions increase the Eg values of PDI-BI (PDI-BI-18), and the decreased amounts of EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values for molecules PDI-BI-13-18 are similar, respectively. The EHOMO value decrease is the largest when the –NO2 groups are in the 4 and 5-positions of PDI-BI. The decrease of the ELOMO value is the largest when the –CN groups are in the 3 and 6-positions of the molecule PDI-BI. The Eg value is the largest when the –NO2 groups are in the 3 and 6-positions the molecule PDI-BI. For molecules PDI-BI-19-26, the –CH3 group in different substituent position affects the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg of PDI-BI slightly. These results reveal that the electron withdrawing substituents can decrease the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values of PDI-BI. The electron donating substituents affect EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg values of PDI-BI slightly.
The EHOMO and ELOMO values of FMO for molecules X1, X2, PDI-BI-1, PDI-BI-13, and PDI-BI-19 are plotted in Figure 4. The molecules PDI-BI-1, PDI-BI-13, and PDI-BI-19 are the representatives of the different kinds of substituent molecules, respectively. As shown in Figure 4, one can see that the LUMO energies of PDI-BI-13 are lower (0.32 and 0.30 eV) than those of X1 and X2, which indicates that PDI-BI-13 is suitable for the FMOs of X1 and X2, respectively. That is to say, molecules PDI-BI-14, PDI-BI-15, PDI-BI-16, and PDI-BI-17 are also suitable for the FMOs of X1 and X2, respectively. This reveals that the di-CN, di-NO2, or –CN and –NO2 groups substituents can decrease the FMOs of PDI-BI. Thus, proper substitutions can tune the FMOs of PDI-BI to be more suitable to X1 and X2. Moreover, we calculated the triplet energies of X1, X2, and PDI-BI-13. The calculated results show that the triplet energies are higher than the corresponding singlet energies for X1, X2, and PDI-BI-13, respectively. This indicates that there may be no triplet loss when X1, X2, and PDI-BI-13 are used as the candidates for OSCs devices [38,39,40].

2.2. Absorption Spectra

The longest and the shortest wavelengths of the absorption spectra (λmax and λmin) and adsorption region (R) of the designed molecules are listed in Table 2. The simulated adsorption spectra, plotted using GaussSum 1.0 [41], are shown in Figure 5. The first 20 excited states were considered.
As shown in Table 2 and Figure 5, the –CN group in different positions could increase the λabs-max and λabs-min values of PDI-BI, respectively, except the –CN group in 4-position could decrease the λabs-max value of PDI-BI slightly. The –CN group in the 5, 6, 7, or 8-position can increase the R values of PDI-BI, and the R value increase is larger than the other positions when the –CN group in the 6-position. For –NO2 substituent molecules, the λabs-max values are, in increasing order, PDI-BI-11 < PDI-BI-12 < PDI-BI < PDI-BI-9 < PDI-BI-10, the λabs-min values are, in decreasing order, PDI-BI-10 > PDI-BI-11 ≈ PDI-BI-12 > PDI-BI-9 > PDI-BI, and the R values are in the order PDI-BI-11 < PDI-BI-12 < PDI-BI-9 < PDI-BI-10 < PDI-BI. This shows that the –NO2 group in 2-position could produce a larger increase of λabs-max and λabs-min values than the other positions for PDI-BI, and the –NO2 group in 3-position could produce a larger decrease of the R value than the other positions for PDI-BI. For di-substituent molecules, the substituent groups could increase the λabs-max and λabs-min values of PDI-BI, respectively, except the di-NO2 groups in 3 and 6-position decrease the λabs-max value of PDI-BI, obviously. The di-substituents could decrease the R values of PDI-BI, respectively, except the di-CN groups in 3 and 6-position increase the R value of PDI-BI significantly. The –CH3 groups in different positions affect the λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI slightly. These results reveal that the mono-pull group can increase the λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI, and the push group affects the λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI slightly. Among these molecules, PDI-BI-14 has the largest λabs-max value and PDI-BI-6 has the largest R value, which indicates that it could be a good candidate for the solar cell acceptor.

2.3. Reorganization Energy

The charge transport property of material is important to design the acceptor for a solar cell device, and the reorganization energy plays a role in charge transport and charge separation. It is well-known that the lower the λ values, the better the charge transport property. Thus, we calculated the λe and λh values of PDI-BI and its derivatives. The calculated results are listed in Table 3.
As shown in Table 3, the –CN group in different positions can decrease the λe values and increase the λh values of PDI-BI. This implies that the –CN substituent can improve the electron transport property of PDI-BI. The –CN substituent in the 4-position (PDI-BI-4) owns the largest electron transfer rate. For the –NO2 substituent molecules, the substituent groups can increase the λe and λh values of PDI-BI, except the –NO2 group in 1 or 3 position, which can decrease the λe values of PDI-BI slightly. For the di-substituent molecules, the substituent groups can increase the λe and λh values of PDI-BI, except the di-CN groups (PDI-BI-13 and PDI-BI-14) and –CN in 4-position and –NO2 in 5-position (PDI-BI-16) substituents, which can decrease the λe values of PDI-BI. This indicates that the electron transfer rates of PDI-BI-13, PDI-BI-14, and PDI-BI-16 are higher than that of PDI-BI. For –CH3 substituent molecules, the –CH3 group in different positions affects the λe values of PDI-BI slightly and decreases the λh values of PDI-BI, except the –CH3 group in 8-position, which can increase the the λh values of PDI-BI. This shows that the –CH3 substituent can improve the hole transport property of PDI-BI. The λe values of PDI-BI-4, PDI-BI-13, and PDI-BI-14 are smaller than that of the typical electron transport material tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato) aluminium(III) (Alq3) (λe = 0.276 eV) [42], indicating that their electron transfer rates are higher than that of Alq3. The λh values of molecules PDI-BI-1-26 are smaller than that of N,N′-diphenyl-N,N′-bis(3-methlphenyl)-(1,10-biphenyl)-4,40-diamine (TPD) (λh = 0.290 eV), which is a typical hole transport material [43]. This implies that their hole transfer rates are higher than that of TPD. Among these molecules, PDI-BI-13 has the best electron transport property, and PDI-BI-21 has the best hole transport property.

3. Materials and Methods

Computational Methods

All the calculations were performed with the Gaussian 09 software [44]. Our previous work [31] suggested that the DFT method CAM-B3LYP with the 6-31G(d,p) basis set was reliable for optimization of PDI and its derivatives, and the TD-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) was reasonable for optical property simulation. Hence, the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) method was employed to optimize all the geometry including neutral, cation, and anion PDI-BI-1-26 molecules. The absorption spectra of PDI-BI-1-26 molecules were predicted by the B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p) method. The PBE1PBE/6-31G(d) method was used to optimize the geometry of molecules X1 and X2 [32], and the HOMO and LUMO energies of molecules X1 and X2 were calculated at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level on the basis of the single point energy. The B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) functional was successful in calculating the charge transport parameters [45]. Thus, we calculated the single point energy at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level. The necessary parameters, such as single point energies of neutral, cation, and anion molecules in the ground state (S0), were recomputed for calculating the electronic properties of the molecules. The reorganization energy (λ) was predicted on the basis of the single point energy at the B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level optimised neutral, cationic, and anionic geometries. Herein, the environmental relaxation and changes were ignored, and the reorganization energy of the isolated active organic π conjugated systems was the internal reorganization energy. As a result, Equations (1) and (2) can be used for calculating the values of electron reorganization energy (λe) and hole reorganisation energy (λh) [46]:
λe = [E0− − E−] + [E−0 − E0]
λh = [E0+ − E+] + [E+0 − E0]
E0+ and E0− are the cation and anion single point energies obtained by the optimized structure of the neutral molecule. E+ and E− are the cation and anion single point energies calculated on the basis of the optimized structures of cation and anion molecules. E+0 and E−0 are the neutral single point energies obtained via the optimized structures of cation and anion molecules. E0 is the neutral single point energy calculated by the optimized structure of the neutral molecule at S0.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, we report a theoretical investigation predicting the substitution effects on optical and electronic properties for PDI-BI. The calculated results show that the substituents slightly affect the distribution patterns of FMOs for PDI-BI. The –CN and –NO2 groups in different substituent positions can decrease the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg of PDI-BI. The –CH3 group in different substituent positions affects the EHOMO, ELOMO, and Eg of PDI-BI slightly. The –CN group in different positions could increase the λabs-max and λabs-min values of PDI-BI, respectively, and the –CN group in the 5, 6, 7, or 8-position can increase the R values of PDI-BI. The –NO2 group in 2-position could produce a larger increase in λabs-max and λabs-min values, and the –NO2 group in 3-position could produce a larger decrease of the R value of PDI-BI. The –CH3 groups in different positions slightly affect the λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI. Among these molecules, PDI-BI-14 has the largest λabs-max value and PDI-BI-6 has the largest R value. The –CN group in different positions can decrease the λe values and increase the λh values of PDI-BI. In the –NO2 substituent molecules, the substituent groups can increase the λe and λh values of PDI-BI. The –CH3 group in different positions slightly affects the λe values, and decreases the λh values of PDI-BI. PDI-BI-13 and PDI-BI-21 have the best electron and hole transport properties, respectively. On the basis of these results, we suggest that PDI-BI-13, PDI-BI-14, PDI-BI-15, PDI-BI-16, and PDI-BI-17 are suitable acceptors for X1 and X2. This study should be helpful in further theoretical investigations on such systems and also in the experimental study of solar cell acceptor materials.

Acknowledgments

Financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21302062 and 21563002).

Author Contributions

Xiaoli Lv, Zhuoxin Li, Songyang Li, Guoyou Luan, and Shanshan Tang conceived, designed, and performed the experiments, and shared in writing the manuscript; Dadong Liang analyzed the data; Ruifa Jin contributed analysis tools. All authors shared equally the revision of the final version.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

PDIPerylene diimide
OSCsOrganic solar cells
PCEsPower conversion efficiencies
FMOsFrontier molecular orbital energies
HOMOHighest occupied molecular orbital
LUMOLowest unoccupied molecular orbital
DFTDensity function theory

References

  1. Sharenko, A.; Gehrig, D.; Laquai, F.; Nguyen, T.Q. The effect of solvent additive on the charge generation and photovoltaic performance of a solution-processed small molecule: Perylene diimide bulk heterojunction solar cell. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 4109–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Darling, S.B.; You, F. The case for organic photovoltaics. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 17633–17648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pelzera, K.M.; Darling, S.B. Charge generation in organic photovoltaics: A review of theory and computation. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Mu, C.; Ma, W.; Hu, H.; Jiang, K.; Lin, H.; Ade, H.; Yan, H. Aggregation and morphology control enables multiple cases of high-efficiency polymer solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5293–5293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, J.-D.; Cui, C.; Li, Y.-Q.; Zhou, L.; Ou, Q.-D.; Li, C.; Li, Y.; Tang, J.-X. Polymer solar cells: Single-junction polymer solar cells exceeding 10% power conversion efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 1035–1041. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brunetti, F.G.; Gong, X.; Tong, M.; Heeger, A.J.; Wudl, F. Strain and hückel aromaticity: Driving forces for a promising new generation of electron acceptors in organic electronics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kim, H.U.; Kim, J.-H.; Suh, H.; Kwak, J.; Kim, D.; Grimsdale, A.C.; Yoon, S.C.; Hwang, D.-H. High open circuit voltage organic photovoltaic cells fabricated using 9,9′-bifluorenylidene as a non-fullerene type electron acceptor. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 10950–10952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zhou, T.L.; Jia, T.; Kang, B.N.; Li, F.H.; Fahlman, M.; Wang, Y. Nitrile-substituted QA derivatives: New acceptor materials for solution-processable organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lin, Y.Z.; Cheng, P.; Li, Y.F.; Zhan, X.W. A 3D star-shaped non-fullerene acceptor for solution-processed organic solar cells with a high open-circuit voltage of 1.18 V. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4773–4775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sonar, P.; Ng, G.-M.; Lin, T.T.; Dodabalapur, A.; Chen, Z.-K. Solution processable low bandgap diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) based derivatives: Novel acceptors for organic solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 3626–3636. [Google Scholar]
  11. Woo, C.H.; Holcombe, T.W.; Unruh, D.A.; Sellinger, A.; Frechet, J.M.J. Phenyl vs. alkyl polythiophene: A solar cell comparison using a vinazene derivative as acceptor. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bloking, J.T.; Han, X.; Higgs, A.T.; Kastrop, J.P.; Pandey, L.; Norton, J.E.; Risko, C.; Chen, C.E.; Bredas, J.-L.; Mc Gehee, M.D.; et al. Solution-processed organic solar cells with power conversion efficiencies of 2.5% using benzothiadiazole/imide-based acceptors. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 5484–5490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, Y.; Ding, L.; Shi, K.; Dai, Y.-Z.; Ai, N.; Wang, J.; Pei, J. A non-fullerene small molecule as efficient electron acceptor in organic bulk heterojunction solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 957–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhou, Y.; Dai, Y.-Z.; Zheng, Y.-Q.; Wang, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-Y.; Pei, J. Non-fullerene acceptors containing fluoranthene-fused imides for solution-processed inverted organic solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5802–5804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ren, G.; Ahmed, E.; Jenekhe, S.A. Non-fullerene acceptor-based bulk heterojunction polymer solar cells: Engineering the nanomorphology via processing additives. Adv. Energy Mater. 2011, 1, 946–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ahmed, E.; Ren, G.; Kim, F.S.; Hollenbeck, E.C.; Jenekhe, S.A. Design of new electron acceptor materials for organic photovoltaics: Synthesis, electron transport, photophysics, and photovoltaic properties of oligothiophene-functionalized naphthalene diimides. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 4563–4571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shu, Y.; Lim, Y.-F.; Li, Z.; Purushothaman, B.; Hallani, R.; Kim, J.E.; Parkin, S.R.; Malliaras, G.G.; Anthony, J.E. A survey of electron-deficient pentacenes as acceptors in polymer bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Sci. 2011, 2, 363–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schmidt-Mende, L.; Fechtenkötter, A.; Müllen, K.; Moons, E.; Friend, R.H.; MacKenzie, J.D. Self-organized discotic liquid crystals for high-efficiency organic photovoltaics. Science 2001, 293, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Oku, T.; Takeda, A.; Nagata, A.; Kidowaki, H.; Kumada, K.; Fujimoto, K.; Suzuki, A.; Akiyama, T.; Yamasaki, Y.; Ōsawa, E. Microstructures and photovoltaic properties of C60 based solar cells with copper oxides, CuInS2, phthalocyanines, porphyrin, PVK, nanodiamond, germanium and exciton diffusion blocking layers. Mater. Technol. 2013, 28, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sharenko, A.; Proctor, C.M.; van der Poll, T.S.; Henson, Z.B.; Nguyen, T.-Q.; Bazan, G.C. A high-performing solution-processed small molecule: Perylene diimide bulk heterojunction solar cell. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 4403–4406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lu, Z.H.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, X.; Tang, A.L.; Chen, L.L.; Zhan, C.L.; Yao, J.N. Perylene-diimide based non-fullerene solar cells with 4.34% efficiency through engineering surface donor/acceptor compositions. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 2907–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Würthner, F. Perylene bisimide dyes as versatile building blocks for functional supramolecular architectures. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1564–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ye, L.; Sun, K.; Jiang, W.; Zhang, S.Q.; Zhao, W.C.; Yao, H.F.; Wang, Z.H.; Hou, J.H. Enhanced efficiency in fullerene-free polymer solar cell by incorporating fine-designed donor and acceptor materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 9274–9280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Delgado, M.C.R.; Kim, E.-G.; da Silva Filho, D.A.; Bredas, J.-L. Tuning the charge-transport parameters of perylene diimide single crystals via end and/or core functionalization: A density functional theory investigation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3375–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Y. 25th anniversary article: Recent advances in n-type and ambipolar organic field-effect transistors. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 5372–5391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Weitz, R.T.; Amsharov, K.; Zschieschang, U.; Burghard, M.; Jansen, M.; Kelsch, M.; Rhamati, B.; van Aken, P.A.; Kern, K.; Klauk, H. The importance of grain boundaries for the time-dependent mobility degradation in organic thin-film transistors. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4949–4954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Schmidt, R.D.; Oh, J.H.; Sun, Y.-S.; Deppisch, M.; Krause, A.-M.; Radacki, K.; Braunschweig, H.; Könemann, M.; Erk, P.; Bao, Z.N.; et al. High-performance air-stable n-channel organic thin film transistors based on halogenated perylene bisimide semiconductors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6215–6220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shin, W.S.; Jeong, H.-H.; Kim, M.-K.; Jin, S.-H.; Kim, M.-R.; Lee, J.-K.; Lee, J.W.; Gal, Y.-S. Effects of functional groups at perylene diimide derivatives on organic photovoltaic device application. J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bibi, S.; Li, P.; Zhang, J.P. X-Shaped donor molecules based on benzo[2,1-b:3,4-b′]dithiophene as organic solar cell materials with PDIs as acceptors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 13828–13841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yong, X.; Zhang, J.P. Theoretical investigations for organic solar cells. Mater. Technol. 2013, 28, 40–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, S.S.; Liang, D.D.; Chen, G.; Jin, R.F. Design of acceptors based on perylene diimide toward organic solar cell materials. Mater. Technol. 2015, 30, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yong, X.; Zhang, J.P. A rational design strategy for donors in organic solar cells: The conjugated planar molecules possessing anisotropic multibranches and intramolecular charge transfer. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11159–11166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tang, S.S.; Zhang, J.P. Design of donors with broad absorption regions and suitable frontier molecular orbitals to match typical acceptors via substitution on oligo(thienylenevinylene) toward solar cells. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 1353–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Parr, R.G.; Yang, W. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University: Oxford, UK, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  35. Stratmann, R.E.; Scuseria, G.E.; Frisch, M.J. An efficient implementation of time-dependent density-functional theory for the calculation of excitation energies of large molecules. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 8218–8224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bauernschmitt, R.; Ahlrichs, R. Treatment of electronic ecitations within the adiabatic approximation of time dependent density functional theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1996, 256, 454–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Casida, M.E.; Jamorski, C.; Casida, K.C.; Salahub, D.R. Molecular excitation energies to high-lying bound states from time-dependent density-functional response theory: Characterization and correction of the time-dependent local density approximation ionization threshold. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 4439–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rao, A.; Chow, P.C.Y.; Gélinas, S.; Schlenker, C.W.; Li, C.Z.; Yip, H.L.; Jen, A.K.Y.; Ginger, D.S.; Friend, R.H. The role of spin in the kinetic control of recombination in organic photovoltaics. Nature 2013, 500, 435–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Schlenker, C.W.; Chen, K.S.; Yip, H.L.; Li, C.Z.; Bradshaw, L.R.; Ochsenbein, S.T.; Ding, F.; Li, X.S.; Gamelin, D.R.; Jen, A.K.Y.; et al. Polymer triplet energy levels need not limit photocurrent collection in organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 19661–19668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liedtke, M.; Sperlich, A.; Kraus, H.; Baumann, A.; Deibel, C.; Wirix, M.J.M.; Loos, J.; Cardona, C.M.; Dyakonov, V. Triplet exciton generation in bulk-heterojunction solar cells based on endohedral fullerenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 9088–9094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. O’Boyle, N.M.; Vos, J.G. GaussSum 1.0; Dublin City University: Dublin, Ireland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lin, B.C.; Cheng, C.P.; You, Z.Q.; Hsu, C.P. Charge transport properties of tris(8-hydroxyquinolinato)aluminum(III): Why it is an electron transporter. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 66–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gruhn, N.E.; da Silva Filho, D.A.; Bill, T.G.; Malagoli, M.; Coropceanu, V.; Kahn, A.; Brédas, J.L. The vibrational reorganization energy in pentacene: Molecular influences on charge transport. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7918–7919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G.W.; Schlegel, H.B.; Scuseria, G.E.; Robb, M.A.; Cheeseman, J.R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Petersson, G.A.; et al. Gaussian 09 Suite of Programs; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  45. Wang, L.J.; Nan, G.J.; Yang, X.D.; Peng, Q.; Li, Q.K.; Shuai, Z.G. Computational methods for design of organic materials with high charge mobility. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 423–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Köse, M.E.; Mitchell, W.J.; Kopidakis, N.; Chang, C.H.; Shaheen, S.E.; Kim, K.; Rumbles, G. Theoretical studies on conjugated phenyl-cored thiophene dendrimers for photovoltaic applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 14257–14270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 17 00721 g001 1024
Figure 1. The structures of donors X1 and X2 from Ref. [32].
Figure 1. The structures of donors X1 and X2 from Ref. [32].
Ijms 17 00721 g001
Ijms 17 00721 g002a 1024Ijms 17 00721 g002b 1024Ijms 17 00721 g002c 1024Ijms 17 00721 g002d 1024
Figure 2. The distribution patterns of FMO for PDI-BI and its derivatives at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) level.
Figure 2. The distribution patterns of FMO for PDI-BI and its derivatives at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) level.
Ijms 17 00721 g002aIjms 17 00721 g002bIjms 17 00721 g002cIjms 17 00721 g002d
Ijms 17 00721 g003 1024
Figure 3. The EHOMO and ELOMO values of FMO for PDI-BI and its derivatives at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. The black is PDI-BI, the blue means mono-pull substituent, the purple represents di-pull substituent, and the olive is mono-push substituent.
Figure 3. The EHOMO and ELOMO values of FMO for PDI-BI and its derivatives at the CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. The black is PDI-BI, the blue means mono-pull substituent, the purple represents di-pull substituent, and the olive is mono-push substituent.
Ijms 17 00721 g003
Ijms 17 00721 g004 1024
Figure 4. Evaluation of the computed HOMO and LUMO energies for PDI-BI, PDI-BI-1, PDI-BI-13, and PDI-BI-19 as well as the HOMO and LUMO energies for X1 and X2 at the CAM-B3LYP6-31G(d)//PBE0/6-31G(d) level. The black line represents singlets, and the red line represents triplets.
Figure 4. Evaluation of the computed HOMO and LUMO energies for PDI-BI, PDI-BI-1, PDI-BI-13, and PDI-BI-19 as well as the HOMO and LUMO energies for X1 and X2 at the CAM-B3LYP6-31G(d)//PBE0/6-31G(d) level. The black line represents singlets, and the red line represents triplets.
Ijms 17 00721 g004
Ijms 17 00721 g005a 1024Ijms 17 00721 g005b 1024
Figure 5. The calculated absorption spectra of PDI-BI and its derivatives (value of full width at half maximum is 3000 cm−1).
Figure 5. The calculated absorption spectra of PDI-BI and its derivatives (value of full width at half maximum is 3000 cm−1).
Ijms 17 00721 g005aIjms 17 00721 g005b
Table
Table 1. Chemical structure of PDI-BI derivatives (Rn are –H except for mentioned in the Table). Ijms 17 00721 i001
Table 1. Chemical structure of PDI-BI derivatives (Rn are –H except for mentioned in the Table). Ijms 17 00721 i001
MoleculesR-GroupsMoleculesR-Groups
PDI-BI-1R1 = –CNPDI-BI-14R3 = –CN R6 = –CN
PDI-BI-2R2 = –CNPDI-BI-15R3 = –CN R6 = –NO2
PDI-BI-3R3 = –CNPDI-BI-16R4 = –CN R5 = –NO2
PDI-BI-4R4 = –CNPDI-BI-17R4 = –NO2 R5 = –NO2
PDI-BI-5R5 = –CNPDI-BI-18R3 = –NO2 R6 = –NO2
PDI-BI-6R6 = –CNPDI-BI-19R1 = –CH3
PDI-BI-7R7 = –CNPDI-BI-20R2 = –CH3
PDI-BI-8R8 = –CNPDI-BI-21R3 = –CH3
PDI-BI-9R1 = –NO2PDI-BI-22R4 = –CH3
PDI-BI-10R2 = –NO2PDI-BI-23R5 = –CH3
PDI-BI-11R3 = –NO2PDI-BI-24R6 = –CH3
PDI-BI-12R4 = –NO2PDI-BI-25R7 = –CH3
PDI-BI-13R4 = –CN R5 = –CNPDI-BI-26R8 = –CH3
Table
Table 2. The predicted EHOMO, ELOMO, Eg, λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI and its derivatives at the TD-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)//CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) Level.
Table 2. The predicted EHOMO, ELOMO, Eg, λabs-max, λabs-min, and R values of PDI-BI and its derivatives at the TD-B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)//CAM-B3LYP/6-31G(d) Level.
EHOMOELOMOEgλabs-maxλabs-minR
PDI-BI−6.88−2.444.44570.40269.50300.90
PDI-BI-1−7.14−2.744.40581.24282.68298.56
PDI-BI-2−7.14−2.754.39580.46281.54298.92
PDI-BI-3−7.16−2.754.41572.27281.43290.84
PDI-BI-4−7.15−2.724.43569.68278.77290.91
PDI-BI-5−7.13−2.744.39588.55278.64309.91
PDI-BI-6−7.12−2.764.36595.24280.40314.84
PDI-BI-7−7.14−2.764.38590.79281.67309.12
PDI-BI-8−7.14−2.754.39592.00280.06311.94
PDI-BI-9−7.17−2.744.43574.08297.82276.26
PDI-BI-10−7.12−2.714.41584.98300.92284.06
PDI-BI-11−7.19−2.704.49557.27298.59258.68
PDI-BI-12−7.18−2.724.46564.87298.98265.89
PDI-BI-13−7.40−3.004.40584.00289.49294.51
PDI-BI-14−7.39−3.054.34596.19291.72304.47
PDI-BI-15−7.40−3.004.40585.19305.80279.39
PDI-BI-16−7.43−3.014.42581.03307.99273.04
PDI-BI-17−7.45−3.024.43582.91311.98270.93
PDI-BI-18−7.43−2.954.48567.95343.18224.77
PDI-BI-19−6.86−2.394.47564.68270.26294.42
PDI-BI-20−6.83−2.374.46559.84271.85287.99
PDI-BI-21−6.84−2.374.47557.89271.51286.38
PDI-BI-22−6.85−2.394.46564.76269.00295.76
PDI-BI-23−6.85−2.394.46567.34270.18297.16
PDI-BI-24−6.82−2.374.45564.37272.33292.04
PDI-BI-25−6.82−2.374.45562.73272.19290.54
PDI-BI-26−6.84−2.394.45571.83270.17301.66
Table
Table 3. Calculated λe and λh (eV) values of PDI-BI and its derivatives.
Table 3. Calculated λe and λh (eV) values of PDI-BI and its derivatives.
λeλh
PDI-BI0.2980.210
PDI-BI-10.2780.222
PDI-BI-20.2770.215
PDI-BI-30.2780.221
PDI-BI-40.2720.222
PDI-BI-50.2820.226
PDI-BI-60.2850.224
PDI-BI-70.2860.230
PDI-BI-80.2780.232
PDI-BI-90.2960.225
PDI-BI-100.3600.236
PDI-BI-110.2900.222
PDI-BI-120.3200.234
PDI-BI-130.2650.240
PDI-BI-140.2660.240
PDI-BI-150.3430.249
PDI-BI-160.2790.245
PDI-BI-170.3120.264
PDI-BI-180.4760.250
PDI-BI-190.2970.201
PDI-BI-200.2960.201
PDI-BI-210.2960.195
PDI-BI-220.2980.200
PDI-BI-230.2990.205
PDI-BI-240.2980.206
PDI-BI-250.2980.200
PDI-BI-260.3000.213

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lv, X.; Li, Z.; Li, S.; Luan, G.; Liang, D.; Tang, S.; Jin, R. Design of Acceptors with Suitable Frontier Molecular Orbitals to Match Donors via Substitutions on Perylene Diimide for Organic Solar Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050721

AMA Style

Lv X, Li Z, Li S, Luan G, Liang D, Tang S, Jin R. Design of Acceptors with Suitable Frontier Molecular Orbitals to Match Donors via Substitutions on Perylene Diimide for Organic Solar Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2016; 17(5):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050721

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lv, Xiaoli, Zhuoxin Li, Songyang Li, Guoyou Luan, Dadong Liang, Shanshan Tang, and Ruifa Jin. 2016. "Design of Acceptors with Suitable Frontier Molecular Orbitals to Match Donors via Substitutions on Perylene Diimide for Organic Solar Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17, no. 5: 721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17050721

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop