Hemipteran Mitochondrial Genomes: Features, Structures and Implications for Phylogeny

Abstract

The study of Hemipteran mitochondrial genomes (mitogenomes) began with the Chagas disease vector, Triatoma dimidiata, in 2001. At present, 90 complete Hemipteran mitogenomes have been sequenced and annotated. This review examines the history of Hemipteran mitogenomes research and summarizes the main features of them including genome organization, nucleotide composition, protein-coding genes, tRNAs and rRNAs, and non-coding regions. Special attention is given to the comparative analysis of repeat regions. Gene rearrangements are an additional data type for a few families, and most mitogenomes are arranged in the same order to the proposed ancestral insect. We also discuss and provide insights on the phylogenetic analyses of a variety of taxonomic levels. This review is expected to further expand our understanding of research in this field and serve as a valuable reference resource.

1. Introduction

Entomologists first suggested that Hemiptera (true bugs) and Homoptera (planthoppers, leafhoppers, cicadas, spittlebugs, aphids, psyllids, scales, and whiteflies) are two orders according to features of the wing [1]. In 1810, Latreille suggested combining Heteroptera and Homoptera as one order called Hemiptera (s.l.) [2]. The concept of Hemiptera (s.l.) has been widely accepted since 1969 to the present [3,4,5]; therefore, in this review, Hemiptera refers to Hemiptera (s.l.). As one major order of insects, Hemiptera is the largest group of the hemimetabolous insects [6], including more than 50,000 described species [7]. They are small sap-sucking insects with body-sizes from 1 mm (0.04 in) to approximately 15 cm (6 in).

There is great variety within the order Hemiptera, more commonly known as bugs. Hemipterans have evolved an extraordinary range of body forms and lifestyles: some live on land, some live in water, some feed on plants and others are voracious carnivores or scavengers. Therefore, many species of Hemiptera are significant pests of crops and gardens. Some, as many species of aphid, cause direct damage to crop hosts and often kill the entire plants. Additionally, some delphacids cause considerable damage to grain production and have been identified as one cause of rice famine in several Asian countries [8]. Moreover, many species of Hemiptera are vectors of viruses and diseases. For example, Triatoma dimidiata is the vector of Chagas disease, a predominantly chronic disease affecting millions of people [9].

Based on the history of Hemipteran phylogeny research, we propose two controversial questions. First, how many suborders does Hemiptera include? Traditionally, Hemiptera comprised three major groups (including four suborders): Sternorrhyncha (aphids, scale bugs, whiteflies, and psyllids), Auchenorrhyncha (planthoppers, leafhoppers, spittlebugs, and cicadas), and Heteroptera (true bugs, including Coleorrhyncha) [10]. Previous morphological studies suggested that Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha formed Auchenorrhyncha, and that Auchenorrhyncha is more closely related to Coleorrhyncha and Sternorrhyncha than to Heteroptera [11]. However, additional molecular and morphological evidence has challenged the monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha (summarized by [12]). The second question, what are the relationships of these suborders that have confused entomologists for many years? Cobben suggested that both Heteroptera and Fulgoromorpha form the sister clade to (Sternorrhyncha, Cicadomorpha) according to a cladistic study of morphological traits [13]. Hamilton examined the phylogenetic affiliations using features of the head and mouthparts and suggested (Fulgoromorpha, (Sternorrhyncha, Cicadomorpha)) was the sister group to the clade (Coleorrhyncha, Heteroptera) [14]. However, it has been argued that Coleorrhyncha and Heteroptera do not have an immediate common ancestor and have descended independently from separate lineages [15]. Hence, the phylogenetic relationships among the higher-level hemipteran lineages remain unclear.

Since the first insect mitogenome was published in 1985 [16], there has been a rapid accumulation of sequenced insect genomes, with representatives from all orders now available [17]. Insect mitogenomes are small, double stranded, circular DNA molecules, ranging in size from 14 to 19 kb. The mitogenome is composed of thirty-seven genes (13 protein-coding, 22 transfer RNA, and 2 ribosomal RNA genes), and contains a control region (A + T-rich region) that is thought to play a role in the initiation of transcription and replication, and is a source of length variation in the genome [18]. Particularly, mitogenome sequences can provide even more genetic information and are increasingly being utilized in insect identification, biogeographic and phylogenetic studies [19,20,21].

Here, we utilize all the mitogenomes of Hemiptera to analyze their features on the genome level and summarize the rearrangement events for the first time. In addition, all available complete mitogenomes of Hemiptera were used to reconstruct and discuss the phylogeny relationships of this order.

2. Mitogenomes of Hemiptera

Triatoma dimidiata, the vector of Chagas disease, was the first published mitogenome of Hemipterain 2001 [9]. The sequencing history of hemipteran mitogenomes was shown (Figure 1a). There are two peaks during the past 14 years. Three years after the publication of the mitogenome of Triatoma dimidiata, Thao et al. [22] reported the complete nucleotide sequence of the mitogenomes of six species of whiteflies, one psyllid and one aphid from the suborder Sternorrhyncha. Four species of whiteflies had variations in gene order that were very different from the proposed insect ancestor (Drosophila yakuba) [16]. Subsequently, a number of studies have already proved that the rearrangements were more likely to happen in the mitogenomes of whiteflies than other insects of Hemiptera [22,23,24,25]. In 2008, Bu’s group obtained 10 complete and five nearly complete mitogenomes of Heteroptera [23] and they reported the first comparative mitogenome analysis of one suborder of Hemiptera and the phylogenetic relationships of Heteroptera [23]. With the development of PCR technology and the use of next-generation sequencing strategies [26,27,28], many complete mitogenome sequences of Hemiptera have been obtained and more will be sequenced (Figure 1a).

Figure 1. Accumulation of mitogenome data from Hemiptera. (a) The number of species sequenced in each year is represented by the blue line; (b) The number of species sequenced in each suborder is represented by the different pieces of the pie graph.

Figure 1. Accumulation of mitogenome data from Hemiptera. (a) The number of species sequenced in each year is represented by the blue line; (b) The number of species sequenced in each suborder is represented by the different pieces of the pie graph.

Figure 1b and Table 1 summarize the mitogenomes of Hemiptera from the first report to the present. The total 90 complete mitogenomes can be divided into five parts by different suborders (Figure 1b) (according to the five suborder system) [12]. Heteroptera has the highest species richness of Hemiptera [29], and more than a half of the 90 complete mitogenomes are from this suborder. Coleorrhyncha, small bugs with a cryptic lifestyle, possess a mixture of cicadomorphan and bug-like characters [30], and represent a separate suborder within Hemiptera. This suborder includes a single extant family, Peloridiidae, which is currently distributed only in Patagonia and on the Australian continent [31]. Only two complete mitogenomes of Peloridiidae have been reported to date [12,32], as representatives of Coleorrhyncha. Meanwhile, the provenances and GenBank numbers of these mitogenomes were detailed set out (Table 1). Most of them as the representatives of different taxa in Hemiptera were published for the first time [12,22,23,33].

Table 1. All available complete mitogenomes of Hemiptera.

Suborder	Family	Species	GenBank No.	Reference
Cicadomorpha	Aphrophoridae	Philaenus spumarius	NC_005944	[34]
	Cercopidae	Abidama producta	NC_015799	[35]
	Cercopidae	Aeneolamia contigua	NC_025495	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitetix braconoides	NC_025497	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitetix versicolor	EU725832	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitettix biformis	NC_025496	[35]
	Cercopidae	Paphnutius ruficeps	NC_021100	[36]
	Cicadellidae	Empoasca vitis	NC_024838	[37]
	Cicadellidae	Homalodisca coagulata	AY875213	-
	Cicadellidae	Homalodisca vitripennis	NC_006899	*
	Membracidae	Leptobelus gazella	NC_023219	*
Coleorrhyncha	Peloridiidae	Hackeriella veitchi	GQ884145	[12]
	Peloridiidae	Hemiodoecus leai	NC_025329	[32]
Fulgoromorpha	Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatella	JX880068	[27]
	Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatellus	NC_013706	[38]
	Delphacidae	Nilaparvata lugens	NC_021748	[27]
	Delphacidae	Nilaparvata muiri	NC_024627	-
	Flatidae	Geisha distinctissima	NC_012617	[39]
	Fulgoridae	Laternaria candelaria	NC_019576	[40]
	Fulgoridae	Lycorma delicatula	NC_012835	[19]
	Issidae	Sivaloka damnosa	NC_014286	[41]
	Ricaniidae	Ricania marginalis	JN242415	[40]
Heteroptera	Alydidae	Riptortus pedestris	NC_012462	[23]
	Anthocoridae	Orius niger	NC_012429	[23]
	Anthocoridae	Orius sauteri	NC_024583	[42]
	Aradidae	Aradacanthia heissi	HQ441233	[43]
	Aradidae	Brachyrhynchus hsiaoi	NC_022670	[44]
	Aradidae	Neuroctenus parus	NC_012459	[23]
	Berytidae	Yemmalysus parallelus	NC_012464	[23]
	Colobathristidae	Phaenacantha marcida	NC_012460	[23]
	Coreidae	Hydaropsis longirostris	NC_012456	[23]
	Cydnidae	Macroscytus gibbulus	EU427338	[23]
	Enicocephalidae	Stenopirates sp.	NC_016017	[45]
	Gelastocoridae	Nerthra indica	NC_012838	[19]
	Geocoridae	Geocoris pallidipennis	NC_012424	[23]
	Gerridae	Aquarius paludum	NC_012841	[19]
	Hydrometridae	Hydrometra greeni	NC_012842	[19]
	Largidae	Physopelta gutta	NC_012432	[23]
	Lygaeidae	Kleidocerys resedae	KJ584365	[46]
Heteroptera	Malcidae	Chauliops fallax	NC_020772	[47]
	Malcidae	Malcus inconspicuus	NC_012458	[23]
	Miridae	Adelphocoris fasciaticollis	NC_023796	[48]
	Miridae	Apolygus lucorum	NC_023083	[49]
	Miridae	Lygus lineolaris	EU401991	-
	Miridae	Nesidiocoris tenuis	NC_022677	[50]
	Nabidae	Alloeorhynchus bakeri	HM235722	[51]
	Nabidae	Gorpis annulatus	NC_019595	[24]
	Nabidae	Gorpis humeralis	NC_019593	[24]
	Nabidae	Nabis apicalis	NC_019594	[24]
	Naucoridae	Ilyocoris cimicoides	NC_012845	[19]
	Nepidae	Laccotrephes robustus	NC_012817	[19]
	Notonectidae	Enithares tibialis	NC_012819	[19]
	Ochteridae	Ochterus marginatus	NC_012820	[19]
	Pentatomidae	Dolycoris baccarum	NC_020373	[52]
	Pentatomidae	Halyomorpha halys	NC_013272	[53]
	Pentatomidae	Nezara viridula	NC_011755	[23]
	Plataspidae	Coptosoma bifaria	NC_012449	[23]
	Plataspidae	megacopta cribraria	NC_015342	*
	Pleidae	Paraplea frontalis	NC_012822	[19]
	Pyrrhocoridae	Dysdercus cingulatus	NC_012421	[23]
	Reduviidae	Agriosphodrus dohrni	NC_015842	[54]
	Reduviidae	Brontostoma colossus	NC_024745	[28]
	Reduviidae	Oncocephalus breviscutum	NC_022816	[55]
	Reduviidae	Peirates arcuatus	NC_024264	[56]
	Reduviidae	Sirthenea flavipes	NC_020143	[57]
	Reduviidae	Triatoma dimidiata	NC_002609	[9]
	Reduviidae	Valentia hoffmanni	NC_012823	[19]
	Rhopalidae	Aeschyntelus notatus	NC_012446	[23]
	Rhopalidae	Stictopleurus subviridis	NC_012888	-
	Saldidae	Saldula arsenjevi	NC_012463	[23]
	Tessaratomidae	Eusthenes cupreus	NC_022449	[58]
	Tingidae	Corythucha ciliata	NC_022922	[59]
	Tingidae	Pseudacysta perseae	NC_025299	*
	Urostylididae	Urochela quadrinotata	NC_020144	[60]
Sternorrhyncha	Aleyrodidae	Aleurochiton aceris	NC_006160	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Aleurodicus dugesii	NC_005939	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Bemisia afer	NC_024056	[25]
	Aleyrodidae	Bemisia tabaci	NC_006279	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Neomaskellia andropogonis	NC_006159	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Tetraleurodes acaciae	NC_006292	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Trialeurodes vaporariorum	NC_006280	[22]
	Aphididae	Acyrthosiphon pisum	NC_011594	*
	Aphididae	Aphis gossypii	NC_024581	[61]
	Aphididae	Cavariella salicicola	NC_022682	[62]
	Aphididae	Cervaphis quercus	NC_024926	[33]
	Aphididae	Diuraphis noxia	NC_022727	[63]
	Aphididae	Schizaphis graminum	NC_006158	[22]
	Aphididae	Sitobion avenae	NC_024683	[64]
	Psyllidae	Pachypsylla venusta	NC_006157	[22]
	Psyllidae	Paratrioza sinica	NC_024577	[65]

Legend: “-” refer to direct submission; “*” refers to submitted the data and not a published paper.

Table 1. All available complete mitogenomes of Hemiptera.

Suborder	Family	Species	GenBank No.	Reference
Cicadomorpha	Aphrophoridae	Philaenus spumarius	NC_005944	[34]
	Cercopidae	Abidama producta	NC_015799	[35]
	Cercopidae	Aeneolamia contigua	NC_025495	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitetix braconoides	NC_025497	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitetix versicolor	EU725832	[35]
	Cercopidae	Callitettix biformis	NC_025496	[35]
	Cercopidae	Paphnutius ruficeps	NC_021100	[36]
	Cicadellidae	Empoasca vitis	NC_024838	[37]
	Cicadellidae	Homalodisca coagulata	AY875213	-
	Cicadellidae	Homalodisca vitripennis	NC_006899	*
	Membracidae	Leptobelus gazella	NC_023219	*
Coleorrhyncha	Peloridiidae	Hackeriella veitchi	GQ884145	[12]
	Peloridiidae	Hemiodoecus leai	NC_025329	[32]
Fulgoromorpha	Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatella	JX880068	[27]
	Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatellus	NC_013706	[38]
	Delphacidae	Nilaparvata lugens	NC_021748	[27]
	Delphacidae	Nilaparvata muiri	NC_024627	-
	Flatidae	Geisha distinctissima	NC_012617	[39]
	Fulgoridae	Laternaria candelaria	NC_019576	[40]
	Fulgoridae	Lycorma delicatula	NC_012835	[19]
	Issidae	Sivaloka damnosa	NC_014286	[41]
	Ricaniidae	Ricania marginalis	JN242415	[40]
Heteroptera	Alydidae	Riptortus pedestris	NC_012462	[23]
	Anthocoridae	Orius niger	NC_012429	[23]
	Anthocoridae	Orius sauteri	NC_024583	[42]
	Aradidae	Aradacanthia heissi	HQ441233	[43]
	Aradidae	Brachyrhynchus hsiaoi	NC_022670	[44]
	Aradidae	Neuroctenus parus	NC_012459	[23]
	Berytidae	Yemmalysus parallelus	NC_012464	[23]
	Colobathristidae	Phaenacantha marcida	NC_012460	[23]
	Coreidae	Hydaropsis longirostris	NC_012456	[23]
	Cydnidae	Macroscytus gibbulus	EU427338	[23]
	Enicocephalidae	Stenopirates sp.	NC_016017	[45]
	Gelastocoridae	Nerthra indica	NC_012838	[19]
	Geocoridae	Geocoris pallidipennis	NC_012424	[23]
	Gerridae	Aquarius paludum	NC_012841	[19]
	Hydrometridae	Hydrometra greeni	NC_012842	[19]
	Largidae	Physopelta gutta	NC_012432	[23]
	Lygaeidae	Kleidocerys resedae	KJ584365	[46]
Heteroptera	Malcidae	Chauliops fallax	NC_020772	[47]
	Malcidae	Malcus inconspicuus	NC_012458	[23]
	Miridae	Adelphocoris fasciaticollis	NC_023796	[48]
	Miridae	Apolygus lucorum	NC_023083	[49]
	Miridae	Lygus lineolaris	EU401991	-
	Miridae	Nesidiocoris tenuis	NC_022677	[50]
	Nabidae	Alloeorhynchus bakeri	HM235722	[51]
	Nabidae	Gorpis annulatus	NC_019595	[24]
	Nabidae	Gorpis humeralis	NC_019593	[24]
	Nabidae	Nabis apicalis	NC_019594	[24]
	Naucoridae	Ilyocoris cimicoides	NC_012845	[19]
	Nepidae	Laccotrephes robustus	NC_012817	[19]
	Notonectidae	Enithares tibialis	NC_012819	[19]
	Ochteridae	Ochterus marginatus	NC_012820	[19]
	Pentatomidae	Dolycoris baccarum	NC_020373	[52]
	Pentatomidae	Halyomorpha halys	NC_013272	[53]
	Pentatomidae	Nezara viridula	NC_011755	[23]
	Plataspidae	Coptosoma bifaria	NC_012449	[23]
	Plataspidae	megacopta cribraria	NC_015342	*
	Pleidae	Paraplea frontalis	NC_012822	[19]
	Pyrrhocoridae	Dysdercus cingulatus	NC_012421	[23]
	Reduviidae	Agriosphodrus dohrni	NC_015842	[54]
	Reduviidae	Brontostoma colossus	NC_024745	[28]
	Reduviidae	Oncocephalus breviscutum	NC_022816	[55]
	Reduviidae	Peirates arcuatus	NC_024264	[56]
	Reduviidae	Sirthenea flavipes	NC_020143	[57]
	Reduviidae	Triatoma dimidiata	NC_002609	[9]
	Reduviidae	Valentia hoffmanni	NC_012823	[19]
	Rhopalidae	Aeschyntelus notatus	NC_012446	[23]
	Rhopalidae	Stictopleurus subviridis	NC_012888	-
	Saldidae	Saldula arsenjevi	NC_012463	[23]
	Tessaratomidae	Eusthenes cupreus	NC_022449	[58]
	Tingidae	Corythucha ciliata	NC_022922	[59]
	Tingidae	Pseudacysta perseae	NC_025299	*
	Urostylididae	Urochela quadrinotata	NC_020144	[60]
Sternorrhyncha	Aleyrodidae	Aleurochiton aceris	NC_006160	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Aleurodicus dugesii	NC_005939	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Bemisia afer	NC_024056	[25]
	Aleyrodidae	Bemisia tabaci	NC_006279	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Neomaskellia andropogonis	NC_006159	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Tetraleurodes acaciae	NC_006292	[22]
	Aleyrodidae	Trialeurodes vaporariorum	NC_006280	[22]
	Aphididae	Acyrthosiphon pisum	NC_011594	*
	Aphididae	Aphis gossypii	NC_024581	[61]
	Aphididae	Cavariella salicicola	NC_022682	[62]
	Aphididae	Cervaphis quercus	NC_024926	[33]
	Aphididae	Diuraphis noxia	NC_022727	[63]
	Aphididae	Schizaphis graminum	NC_006158	[22]
	Aphididae	Sitobion avenae	NC_024683	[64]
	Psyllidae	Pachypsylla venusta	NC_006157	[22]
	Psyllidae	Paratrioza sinica	NC_024577	[65]

Legend: “-” refer to direct submission; “*” refers to submitted the data and not a published paper.

3. Features of Hemipteran Mitogenomes

3.1. Genome Organization

The mitogenome sizes of Hemiptera range from 14,371 bp (Nilaparvata muiri) to 18,414 bp (Trialeurodes vaporariorum) and have an average value of 15,733 bp (Figure 2). The size changes of five suborders are also shown (Figure 2). The size variation is mainly attributed to the non-coding regions, especially the control regions and repeat regions in some groups (such as the control regions of the true water bugs [23] and the repeat regions of aphids [62]).

Figure 2. The size variation of mitogenomes from Hemiptera.

Figure 2. The size variation of mitogenomes from Hemiptera.

Most of the mitogenomes (76/90) resemble that of the known ancestral species (D. yakuba [16]) in structural organization and composition with 13 protein coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), and 2 ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs). The remaining mitogenomes differ only in the number of tRNAs, most likely due to gene deletion events. For example, Neomaskellia andropogonis (Sternorrhyncha) contains only 18 tRNAs [22].

3.2. Nucleotide Composition

The A%, T%, C% and G% values and the AT and GC skews were calculated for all available complete mitogenomes of Hemiptera species (Figure 3). Interestingly, the lowest and the highest A + T contents of the hemipteran mitogenomes were found in the suborder Sternorrhyncha (65.67% in Bemisia afer and 86.33% in Aleurodicus dugesii). Species from the suborders Fulgoromorpha, Coleorrhyncha and Heteroptera were all A and C skewed. This was also the case for the species of Cicadomorpha, except for Empoasca vitis. For the suborder Sternorrhyncha, nine species were A and C skewed, including all aphid species. This discovery of all aphid species forming a cluster is similar to the results of previous studies (cycle in Figure 3 [62,63]). In contrast, the seven other Sternorrhynchan species (whiteflies), which had highly rearranged gene orders [22,25], were G and T skewed.

Figure 3. Nucleotide composition across 90 complete hemipteran mitogenomes. (A) A + T content and AT skew; (B) G+C content and GC skew. Dots in the cycle represent values for all the seven aphid mitogenomes.

Figure 3. Nucleotide composition across 90 complete hemipteran mitogenomes. (A) A + T content and AT skew; (B) G+C content and GC skew. Dots in the cycle represent values for all the seven aphid mitogenomes.

3.3. Protein-Coding Genes

All PCGs in the majority of hemipteran mitogenomes were initiated with familiar triplet initiation codons (as shown in the invertebrate mitochondrial genetic code table), including the commonly used ATN and some special couplet codons. For instance, in the suborder Coleorrhyncha, cox1 starts with CGA in Xenophyes cascus and with TCG in Hackeriella veitchi [12]. Furthermore, the tetranucleotide initiation codons were also found in hemipteran mitogenomes; such as in Cydnidae where nad2 was supposed to be initiated with an atypical initiation codon, ATCA [23]. In fact, atypical initiation codons are not rare in other insects; for example, the tetranucleotide TTAG is the initiation codon for cox1 of Bombyx mori (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) [66]. Most PCGs stopped with TAA/TAG termination codons or truncated termination codons (TA or T) that are presumed to be completed via posttranscriptional polyadenylation [67].

In view of the evolutionary forces acting on the mitochondrial PCGs of hemipteran species, the average rate of non-synonymous substitutions (Ka), the average rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks), the average ratio of Ka/Ks, and the Jukes-Cantor adjusted Ka/Ks (JKa/JKs) were calculated for each PCG, respectively [68]. The results showed that atp8 had the highest evolutionary rate, followed by nad2, while cox1 appeared to be the lowest (Figure 4). Notably, the ratio of Ka/Ks for each PCG was below 1, indicating that these genes are evolving under purifying selection. The uniformly low values of the Ka/Ks and JKa/JKs ratios for cox1–3 and cob indicate strong evolutionary constraints in cytochrome c oxidase [69] and also suggest a strong purifying selection in the species of Hemiptera. Therefore, a DNA barcoding approach based on cox1 sequence diversity has been utilized for identification of closely related species [70]. Similarly, cob and cox2 with relatively slow rates may also be candidate barcoding markers [24,62]. By contrast, due to the highest divergence, atp8 and nad2 can be used as an effective molecular marker to analyze intraspecific relationships and reveal relationships between populations within the same hemipteran species. This result is highly consistent with previous findings in most metazoans [71].

Figure 4. Evolutionary rates of protein-coding genes in hemipteran mitogenomes. The blue bar indicates the gene’s Ka/Ks, and the red bar indicates the Jukes-Cantor adjusting data.

Figure 4. Evolutionary rates of protein-coding genes in hemipteran mitogenomes. The blue bar indicates the gene’s Ka/Ks, and the red bar indicates the Jukes-Cantor adjusting data.

3.4. tRNAs and rRNAs

All 22 tRNA coding genes usually were found in the mitogenomes of Hemiptera and the tRNAs were between 60 and 75 bp in length. The anticodon nucleotides for the corresponding tRNA genes are identical to those of other available arthropod mitogenomes [66,72]. All tRNA genes had the typical clover-leaf structure with one exception: trnS(AGN), in which the dihydrouridine arm formed a simple loop (as in some other metazoan species, including most insects [66,72,73].

The arrangements of both rrnL and rrnS in the hemipteran mitogenomes are commonly conserved, and are generally located between trnL(CUN) and trnV, and between trnV and the control region. The lengths of rrnL and rrnS are determined to be 1192–1260 and 711–766 bp, respectively. These lengths are similar to those of other orders of Insecta [16,66,72,73].

3.5. Non-Coding Regions

There are some non-coding (NC) regions interspersed throughout the hemipteran mitogenomes, thus the mitogenomes of Hemiptera displayed a moderate size variation. Four distinct large NC regions were identified in the following gene pairs of hemipteran mitogenomes: trnI-trnQ, trnS-nad1, trnE-trnF and rrnS-trnI. The region located between rrnS and trnI, coincided with the A + T-rich region, also called the control region, including the origin of replication and promoters for transcription initiation [16,74,75]. Tandem repeats were detected in the remaining three regions, and named repeat regions.

3.5.1. Control Region

Most control regions of hemipteran mitogenomes were longer than 1 kb, with high rates of nucleotide substitution and indels, and a variable number of tandem repeats. Generally, one control region of the hemipteran mitogenome includes four parts without order: tandem repeat sequences, sequences of poly(T) stretch, a subregion with high A + T content, and stem-loop structures (for example, Chauliops fallax Figure 5a). This feature of the control region was summarized by Cook for arthropods [76]. There are some interesting exceptions in the hemipteran mitogenomes. For example, in some species of Cicadomorpha (Philaenus spumarius) [34], Fulgoromorpha (Geisha distinctissima, Sivaloka damnosa, Laodelphax striatella and Laodelphax striatellus) [27,38,39,41] and Heteroptera (Alloeorhynchus bakeri) [51], two fragments of tandem repeat sequences insert into the control region separately (for example, Philaenus spumarius Figure 5b). A few of the control regions of hemipteran species did not contain all four parts (for example, Schizaphis graminum Figure 5c) [22]. The conserved sequences, stem-loop structures and tandem repeat sequences found in the present study can provide useful information for research of the phylogeny of specific groups [34,35,45,47,62]. For example, in the systematic research of Aphidinae, the phylogenetic tree based on PCGs is similar to the clusters of the stem-loop structures [62]. Another interesting question is how functionality is retained under such great variations in both length and sequence. Considering the high nucleotide substitution rate, both the secondary structures and the conserved segments might be key clues in determining the function of the control region.

3.5.2. Repeat Region

In general, the NC regions of an insect mitogenome consist of a control region and short intergenic spacers. However, some special species of Hemiptera include one repeat region (Figure 6). These repeat regions mainly are located into different positions (trnE-trnF, trnI-trnQ and trnS-nad1) in three families (Aphididae, Nabidae and Reduviidae), and differ in repeat unit sequence and copy number, suggesting that they are highly species-specific (Table 2). These repeat regions are not similar to any known sequences in GenBank. We speculate that this region, full of tandem repeats, has a function similar to the intergenic spacer in Apis mellifera that is thought to be another origin of replication [77].

Figure 5. Control regions of mitogenomes from some representative species of Hemiptera. (a) the control region of Chauliops fallax includes four parts; (b) the control region of Philaenus spumarius includes two fragments of tandem repeat sequences; (c) the control region of Schizaphis graminum includes three parts without repeat sequences.

Figure 5. Control regions of mitogenomes from some representative species of Hemiptera. (a) the control region of Chauliops fallax includes four parts; (b) the control region of Philaenus spumarius includes two fragments of tandem repeat sequences; (c) the control region of Schizaphis graminum includes three parts without repeat sequences.

Figure 6. Repeat regions of mitogenomes from some representative species of Hemiptera. (a) the repeat region of Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae); (b) the repeat region of Gorpis humeralis (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Nabidae); (c) the repeat region of Schizaphis graminum (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae).

Figure 6. Repeat regions of mitogenomes from some representative species of Hemiptera. (a) the repeat region of Triatoma dimidiata (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Reduviidae); (b) the repeat region of Gorpis humeralis (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Nabidae); (c) the repeat region of Schizaphis graminum (Hemiptera: Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae).

4. Hemipteran Mitogenome Arrangements and Evolution

Within Insecta, the order of the mitochondrial genes is highly conserved and has led to the proposal of an ancestral gene order [16]. The majority of hemipteran families that have been sequenced possess this ancestral insect arrangement. Gene orders of Coleorrhyncha and Cicadomorpha are mostly conserved; however, a few families of Fulgoromorpha, Sternorrhyncha and Heteroptera show extreme rearrangement (Table 3). The three rearrangement types of gene movements, transposition, inversion, and inverse transposition [78], were all found in the hemipteran mitogenomes (Table 3). Two species in the superfamily Pyrrhocoroidea share the same gene order with the inversion of trnT and trnP [23]. Whiteflies (Aleyrodidae) are the group that is most likely to have rearrangements: cox3-trnG-nad3 is inverse transposed into three different locations in the mitogenome [22]. In Stenopirates sp., the most striking features were the inversion of two tRNA genes (trnT and trnP) and the transpositions of five gene clusters (trnT-trnP-nad6, cob-trnS, nad1-trnL, rrnL-trnV-rrnS and control region) between nad4L and trnI [45]. The four hot spots of rearrangements are summarized: 1. upstream of nad2; 2. between nad2 and cox1; 3. between nad4L and nad1; and 4. downstream of rrnL (Table 3).

Table 2. Repeat regions of hemipteran mitogenomes.

Species	Classification	Location	Repeat Number	Repeat Unit Size	Reference
Agriosphodrus dohrni	Heteroptera: Reduviidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	58 bp	[54]
Triatoma dimidiata	Heteroptera: Reduviidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	135 bp	[9]
Gorpis annulatus	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnS-nad1	three and a partial	179 bp	[24]
Gorpis humeralis	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	188 bp	[24]
Gorpis humeralis	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnI-trnQ	five and a partial	244 bp	[24]
Himacerus nodipes	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnI-trnQ	four	135 bp	[24]
Acyrthosiphon pisum	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	seven and a partial	203–206 bp	*
Aphis gossypii	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	four and a partial	196 bp	[61]
Cavariella salicicola	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	three	199 bp	[62]
Diuraphis noxia	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	three and a partial	194–195 bp	[63]
Schizaphis graminum	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	four and a partial	151–153 bp	[22]
Sitobion avenae	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	one and a partial	202 bp	[64]

Legend: “*” refers to submitted the data and not a published paper.

Table 2. Repeat regions of hemipteran mitogenomes.

Species	Classification	Location	Repeat Number	Repeat Unit Size	Reference
Agriosphodrus dohrni	Heteroptera: Reduviidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	58 bp	[54]
Triatoma dimidiata	Heteroptera: Reduviidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	135 bp	[9]
Gorpis annulatus	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnS-nad1	three and a partial	179 bp	[24]
Gorpis humeralis	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnS-nad1	two and a partial	188 bp	[24]
Gorpis humeralis	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnI-trnQ	five and a partial	244 bp	[24]
Himacerus nodipes	Heteroptera: Nabidae	trnI-trnQ	four	135 bp	[24]
Acyrthosiphon pisum	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	seven and a partial	203–206 bp	*
Aphis gossypii	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	four and a partial	196 bp	[61]
Cavariella salicicola	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	three	199 bp	[62]
Diuraphis noxia	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	three and a partial	194–195 bp	[63]
Schizaphis graminum	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	four and a partial	151–153 bp	[22]
Sitobion avenae	Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae	trnE-trnF	one and a partial	202 bp	[64]

Legend: “*” refers to submitted the data and not a published paper.

Table 3. Mitogenome rearrangements found in Hemiptera.

Classification	Species	Level	Rearrangement	Reference
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatella	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT	[27]
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatellus	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, transposition of trnH, and inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT	[38]
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Nilaparvata lugens	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT, and insertion two trnC	[27]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Aradacanthia heissi	species	Inversion of trnI and trnQ, inversion of trnC and trnW	[43]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Brachyrhynchus hsiaoi	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ	[44]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Neuroctenus parus	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ	[23]
Heteroptera: Enicocephalidae	Stenopirates sp.	species	Inversion of trnT and trnP, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6-cytB-trnS-nad1-trnL-rrnL-trnV-rrnS-control region → cytB-trnS-control region-rrnL-trnV-rrnS-nad1-trnL-trnP-trnT-nad6	[45]
Heteroptera: Largidae	Physopelta gutta	superfamily	Inversion of trnT and trnP	[23]
Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae	Dysdercus cingulatus	superfamily	Inversion of trnT and trnP	[23]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Aleurochiton aceris	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location cob-nad1	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Aleurodicus dugesii	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Bemisia afer	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[25]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Bemisia tabaci	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Neomaskellia andropogonis	genus	Transposition of trnH and trnK, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location rrnL-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Tetraleurodes acaciae	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ and trnA, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Trialeurodes vaporariorum	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ, inversion of trnC and trnY, and transposition of trnG	[22]

Table 3. Mitogenome rearrangements found in Hemiptera.

Classification	Species	Level	Rearrangement	Reference
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatella	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT	[27]
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Laodelphax striatellus	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, transposition of trnH, and inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT	[38]
Fulgoromorpha: Delphacidae	Nilaparvata lugens	family	Inversion of trnC and trnW, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6 → nad6-trnP-trnT, and insertion two trnC	[27]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Aradacanthia heissi	species	Inversion of trnI and trnQ, inversion of trnC and trnW	[43]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Brachyrhynchus hsiaoi	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ	[44]
Heteroptera: Aradidae	Neuroctenus parus	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ	[23]
Heteroptera: Enicocephalidae	Stenopirates sp.	species	Inversion of trnT and trnP, inverse transposition: trnT-trnP-nad6-cytB-trnS-nad1-trnL-rrnL-trnV-rrnS-control region → cytB-trnS-control region-rrnL-trnV-rrnS-nad1-trnL-trnP-trnT-nad6	[45]
Heteroptera: Largidae	Physopelta gutta	superfamily	Inversion of trnT and trnP	[23]
Heteroptera: Pyrrhocoridae	Dysdercus cingulatus	superfamily	Inversion of trnT and trnP	[23]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Aleurochiton aceris	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location cob-nad1	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Aleurodicus dugesii	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Bemisia afer	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[25]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Bemisia tabaci	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Neomaskellia andropogonis	genus	Transposition of trnH and trnK, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location rrnL-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Tetraleurodes acaciae	genus	Inversion of trnC and trnY, transposition of trnQ and trnA, and inverse transposition: cox3-trnG-nad3 → insertion the location control region-rrnS	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae	Trialeurodes vaporariorum	genus	Inversion of trnI and trnQ, inversion of trnC and trnY, and transposition of trnG	[22]

Rearrangements of the mitogenomes are relatively rare events at the evolutionary scale [17]. Therefore, they can be powerful tool to delimit deep divergences among some insect lineages. The first discovery in this aspect of Hemiptera was found in whitefly in 2004. Thao et al. determined the complete mitogenomes of six whitefly species and their results indicated a clustering of whitefly species that corresponded to the gene arrangement types [22]. Then, in 2009, a comparison of gene orders and contents revealed that Hemiptera had three conserved gene blocks shared by all 20 species [53]. Gene orders and contents of both Heteroptera and Auchenorrhyncha (Cicadomorpha and Fulgoromorpha) were mostly conserved, whereas those of Sternorrhyncha showed extreme rearrangement [53]. However, compared with Laodelphax striatella [27], Stenopirates sp. [45] and Aradacanthia heissi [43], rearrangements in species of Fulgoromorpha and other true bugs seem to occur independently of family or species (Table 3). These results suggest that mitogenome orders might lack the resolution to deduce phylogenetic relationships among infraorders within Fulgoromorpha and Heteroptera.

5. Phylogenetic Inferences by Hemipteran Mitogenomes

As mentioned in the introduction, the phylogenic relationship of the Hemiptera has been controversial for many years and two questions remain unanswered. Here, we reviewed the research history of hemipteran phylogenetic relationships based on mitogenomes and combine our phylogenetic analyses to discuss the most reliable results. In 2009, a study clarified the relationships of the three phylogenetically controversial suborders, Auchenorrhyncha, Sternorrhyncha, and Heteroptera [53]. Heteroptera constituted a monophyletic group, and a sister relationship was proposed for Auchenorrhyncha and Sternorrhyncha [53]. However, only one species (Cicadomorpha: Philaenus spumarius) was chosen representing Auchenorrhyncha, and no taxa of Fulgoromorpha were discussed. Therefore, in the same year, Song and Liang [38] increased the samplings of taxa and proposed the inferred genealogical proximities of hemipteran lineages of (Heteroptera + (Cicadomorpha + (Fulgoromorpha + Sternorrhyncha))). In their research, Auchenorrhyncha was clearly separated into two parts, and Fulgoromorpha and Cicadomorpha were not a monophyletic group [38]. In fact, in their reports (in 2010 and 2012), the paraphyly of Auchenorrhyncha was also supported [40,41], and their phylogenetic reconstruction supported a sister relationship between Fulgoromorpha and Sternorrhyncha [40]. The suborder Coleorrhyncha (Hemiptera) has only one extant family, Peloridiidae, comprising 36 species in 17 genera [79]. Species of this group live in the wet mosses of South America (Chile, Argentina), New Zealand, New Caledonia and eastern Australia (from North Queensland to Tasmania) [80]. Complete or nearly complete mitogenomes of Peloridiidae were not obtained until 2013 [12]. Cui’s research was the first phylogenomic study of hemipterans with complete suborder samplings. Their results supported the paraphyly of Auchenorrhyncha and proposed the close relationship between Cicadomorpha and Heteroptera [12]. Meanwhile, our result displayed the similar result (Figure 7): Sternorrhyncha located as the basal suborder and Cicadomorpha and Heteroptera clustered as sister-group. Summarizing all these viewpoints, we can make three conclusions. First, the phylogenetic relationships among suborder-level hemipteran linages remain unclear by using mitogenome inference. Most viewpoints supported that Auchenorrhyncha is not a monophyletic group; Second, whether a monophyletic group or a sister-group to Cicadomorpha, the suborder Heteroptera is the most evolved group of Hemiptera; Third, the positions of other suborders remain confused and require further investigation.

Figure 7. ML and BI Phylogenetic tree inferred from 90 hemipteran mitogenome sequences based on 13 PCGs. The node support values are the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and the bootstrap (BS) values.

Figure 7. ML and BI Phylogenetic tree inferred from 90 hemipteran mitogenome sequences based on 13 PCGs. The node support values are the Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) and the bootstrap (BS) values.

Under the suborder taxa, the phylogenetic research also was involved. We summarized all the research results of these years (Table 4). All the phylogenetic issues of every taxonomic category were considered. For example, in the relationships among the intraorders of Heteroptera, Enicocephalomorpha was the most basal sister-group of the majority of Heteroptera [45]; the position of Cimicomorpha was unclear and it is possible that it is not a monophyletic group [45,47]; and Pentatomomorpha was the most evolved group of Heteroptera [45,47,49,54,60]. Regarding interfamily relationships, Hua et al. conducted phylogenomic studies on the mitogenomes of Pentatomomorpha [23] and Nepomorpha [19], and resolved some superfamily phylogenetic problems (Table 4). In Sternorrhyncha, the mitochondrial gene rearrangements among whiteflies corresponded to the phylogenetic tree [22]. The intrasubfamily relationships of Aphids (a group with special regions [33,63]), were also discussed [62] (Table 4).

Table 4. The phylogenetic analyses under the suborder taxa of Hemiptera.

Classification	Level	Viewpoint	Reference
Cicadomorpha: Cercopidae and Aphrophoridae	family	The monophyly of five Callitettixini species.	[35]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae, whiteflies	genus	Four types of the mitochondrial gene rearrangements among whiteflies were corresponding to the branches of phylogenetic tree.	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae, aphids	subfamily	Treat pterocommatines as members of Macrosiphini.	[62]
Heteroptera: Reduviidae	subfamily	The monophyly of Reduviidae and the Peiratinae presents a sister position to the Triatominae + (Salyavatinae + Harpactorinae).	[57]
Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha	superfamily	The monophyly of Pentatomoidea, Pyrrhocoroidea, Lygaeoidea, and Coreoidea; Aradoidea and the Trichophora are sister groups.	[23]
Heteroptera: Nepomorpha	superfamily	Pleoidea is not a member of the Nepomorpha and Aphelocheiroidea should be grouped back into Naucoroidea.	[19]
Heteroptera: Nabidae	subfamily	Three tribes from two subfamilies of Nabidae.	[24]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The paraphyly of Cimicomorpha, and within Reduviidae, Harpactorinae is a sister group to the Salyavatinae + Triatominae.	[54]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The paraphyly of Cimicomorpha, and Reduviidae was paraphyletic with respect to Anthocoridae and Miridae.	[60]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The sister-relationship within the individual infraorders are supported for the Pentatomomorpha, Nepomorpha, Leptopodomorpha and Gerromorpha; Stenopirates sp. (Enicocephalomorpha) is the sister group to all the remaining Heteroptera.	[45]
Heteroptera	intraorder	Two Gerromorpha superfamilies were monophyletic in the basal position of these five infraorders. Within Cimicomorpha, Reduviidae was paraphyletic with respect to Anthocoridae and Miridae.	[47]
Heteroptera	intraorder	Stenopirates sp. was the sister group to all the remaining Heteroptera; the sister relationships within Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha.	[49]

Table 4. The phylogenetic analyses under the suborder taxa of Hemiptera.

Classification	Level	Viewpoint	Reference
Cicadomorpha: Cercopidae and Aphrophoridae	family	The monophyly of five Callitettixini species.	[35]
Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae, whiteflies	genus	Four types of the mitochondrial gene rearrangements among whiteflies were corresponding to the branches of phylogenetic tree.	[22]
Sternorrhyncha: Aphididae, aphids	subfamily	Treat pterocommatines as members of Macrosiphini.	[62]
Heteroptera: Reduviidae	subfamily	The monophyly of Reduviidae and the Peiratinae presents a sister position to the Triatominae + (Salyavatinae + Harpactorinae).	[57]
Heteroptera: Pentatomomorpha	superfamily	The monophyly of Pentatomoidea, Pyrrhocoroidea, Lygaeoidea, and Coreoidea; Aradoidea and the Trichophora are sister groups.	[23]
Heteroptera: Nepomorpha	superfamily	Pleoidea is not a member of the Nepomorpha and Aphelocheiroidea should be grouped back into Naucoroidea.	[19]
Heteroptera: Nabidae	subfamily	Three tribes from two subfamilies of Nabidae.	[24]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The paraphyly of Cimicomorpha, and within Reduviidae, Harpactorinae is a sister group to the Salyavatinae + Triatominae.	[54]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The paraphyly of Cimicomorpha, and Reduviidae was paraphyletic with respect to Anthocoridae and Miridae.	[60]
Heteroptera	intraorder	The sister-relationship within the individual infraorders are supported for the Pentatomomorpha, Nepomorpha, Leptopodomorpha and Gerromorpha; Stenopirates sp. (Enicocephalomorpha) is the sister group to all the remaining Heteroptera.	[45]
Heteroptera	intraorder	Two Gerromorpha superfamilies were monophyletic in the basal position of these five infraorders. Within Cimicomorpha, Reduviidae was paraphyletic with respect to Anthocoridae and Miridae.	[47]
Heteroptera	intraorder	Stenopirates sp. was the sister group to all the remaining Heteroptera; the sister relationships within Nepomorpha and Gerromorpha.	[49]

In conclusion, the present study shows that mitogenomes may be good molecular markers for phylogenetic inference at a variety of taxonomic levels of Hemiptera (such as suborders, intraorders and families). However, some relationships have not been resolved based solely on mitogenomes. Nuclear genes evolve more slowly, and are effective for the analysis of deeper phylogenetic relationships. Moreover, some endosymbionts co-evolve with their hosts, and symbiont-derived data, in principle, could be used to reconstruct the evolutionary history of hosts [81]. So, with the development of sequencing technology, more available genetic resources are expected to provide more effective information of phylogenetic trees.

6. Experimental Section

6.1. Sampling

A total of 90 taxa were sampled in this study (Table 1). In the phylogeny analyses, the outgroups were sampled from Phthiraptera (Bothriometopus macrocnemis, GenBank accession number: NC_009983) and Thysanoptera (Thrips imaginis, GenBank accession number: NC_004371).

6.2. Analysis of Sequence Data

The nucleotide sequences of PCGs were translated based on the invertebrate mtDNA genetic code. A + T content were calculated using MEGA version 6.0 [82]. Strand asymmetry was calculated using the formulae AT skew = [A − T]/[A + T] and GC skew = [G − C]/[G + C], for the strand encoding the majority of the protein-coding genes. The software packages DnaSP 5.0 [83] was used to calculate the synonymous substitution rate (Ks) and the nonsynonymous substitution rate (Ka) for each PCG as well as Jukes-Cantor adjusted Ka/Ks (JKa/JKs).

6.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Each of the 13 PCGs of all 92 species were aligned individually using MEGA v6.0 [82] with default parameters. Before alignments, the stop codons were all removed from those sequences. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were implemented by PHYML 3.0 [84] and MrBayes version 3.1.2 [85], respectively. Model selection was based on jModeltest v0.1.1 [86]. According to the AIC, the GTR + I + G model was optimal for analysis with nucleotide alignments. MrBayes version 3.1.2 and PHYML were employed to reconstruct the phylogenetic trees. In the ML analysis, the parameters were estimated during analysis and the node support values were assessed by bootstrap re-sampling (BP) calculated using 100 replicates. In Bayesian inference, runs of ten million generations were conducted. Trees were sampled every 1000 generations with a burn-in of 25%.

7. Conclusions and Perspectives

Generally, the complete mitogenomes of Hemiptera were 14–17K bp in size and encoded all 37 genes typical for insects. These genes were arranged in the same order as the proposed ancestral insect, except in a few particular species. Notably, the mitogenomes of three families possessed a large repeat region located at three different positions. We speculate that this region, full of tandem repeats, is another origin of replication. The mitogenomes have been successfully used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships within a variety of taxonomic levels of Hemiptera.

Future work should focus on four goals. First, the comparative genomics of different categories need more taxon samplings and more mitogenome sequences to further describe the comprehensive characteristics of Hemiptera mitogenomes; Second, the research of various populations and phylogeographic structures of hemipteran species based on mitogenomes require more mitogenome sequences about the same species or similar species; Third, the functional and evolutionary significance of different rearrangement types should be examined to open the view of the evolutionary dynamics of Hemiptera mitogenomes; Finally, phylogenetic inference with more resource data will provide greater insight into the evolution of Hemiptera.