Next Article in Journal
Possibility of Breast Cancer Prevention: Use of Soy Isoflavones and Fermented Soy Beverage Produced Using Probiotics
Previous Article in Journal
Borrowing Nuclear DNA Helicases to Protect Mitochondrial DNA
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 16
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms160510888
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Potential Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Costunolide and Dehydrocostuslactone

by
Xuejing Lin
†,
Zhangxiao Peng
† and
Changqing Su
*
Department of Molecular Oncology, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgical Hospital & National Center of Liver Cancer, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200438, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16(5), 10888-10906; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160510888
Submission received: 27 March 2015 / Revised: 10 April 2015 / Accepted: 22 April 2015 / Published: 13 May 2015
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Costunolide (CE) and dehydrocostuslactone (DE) are derived from many species of medicinal plants, such as Saussurea lappa Decne and Laurus nobilis L. They have been reported for their wide spectrum of biological effects, including anti-inflammatory, anticancer, antiviral, antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant, antidiabetic, antiulcer, and anthelmintic activities. In recent years, they have caused extensive interest in researchers due to their potential anti-cancer activities for various types of cancer, and their anti-cancer mechanisms, including causing cell cycle arrest, inducing apoptosis and differentiation, promoting the aggregation of microtubule protein, inhibiting the activity of telomerase, inhibiting metastasis and invasion, reversing multidrug resistance, restraining angiogenesis has been studied. This review will summarize anti-cancer activities and associated molecular mechanisms of these two compounds for the purpose of promoting their research and application.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Medicinal plants have been used to treat cancer for thousands of years in Ancient Egypt, India, China, and Arab world. Statistically, more than 3000 plant species were used for treating cancer worldwide [1]. Plant-derived anticancer agents are an important source of anticancer drug due to more structurally diverse “drug-like” and “biologically friendly” molecular qualities than pure synthetic compounds at random [2]. Currently, four major structural classes of plant-derived agents, namely, the epipodophyllotoxin lignans, the taxane diterpenoids, the vinca alkaloids, and the camptothecin quinoline alkaloid derivatives are used in medicine as single chemical entity compounds [3]. Costunolide (CE) and dehydrocostuslactone (DE), two natural sesquiterpene lactones, present in a number of medicinal plants such as Saussurea lappa and Laurus nobilis, have caused intense interest in researchers due to their potential anti-cancer activities for various types of cancer, such as, leukemias [4], liver cancer [5,6], breast cancer [7,8], ovarian cancer [9,10], prostatic cancer [11,12], and bladder cancer [13]. However, the molecular mechanisms for the anticancer activities of CE and DE are largely ambiguous. Therefore, in the following sections of this short review, we will provide a brief overview of anti-cancer activities and associated molecular mechanisms of these two compounds.

2. General Pharmacology

Dried four- to five-year-old roots of Saussurea lappa, known as costus root, have a reputation for their usage in traditional medicine systems in India, China, Japan, and Pakistan [14]. CE and DE, two sesquiterpene lactones, are the major chemical and bioactive constituents of Saussurea lappa [15]. Much evidence indicates that the α,β-unsaturated carbonyl group in the α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone (Figure 1) moiety of CE and DE may play some pivotal roles through conjugation with mercapto (SH)-groups of target proteins to intervene in some key biological processes in cells [16,17,18,19,20]. Therefore, these two compounds possess various biological activities, including anti-inflammatory [21,22], anticancer [23,24], antiviral [25], antimicrobial [26,27], antifungal [28], antioxidant [29,30], antidiabetic [31], antiulcer [32], and anthelmintic activities [33]. Additionally, they also can lower blood pressure, relieve spasms of smooth muscles, dilate the bronchi, and improve stomach function [34,35].
Currently, clinically available CE and DE-containing drugs, such as, Aplotaxis Carminative Pill, Aucklandiae and Areca Pill, and Compound Ancklandia and Berberine Tablets have been used for treatment of digestive tract diseases with their anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial and stomach function-improving activities.
Ijms 16 10888 g001 1024
Figure 1. Chemical structure and possible anti-cancer mechanisms of Costunolide (CE) and dehydrocostuslactone (DE). CE (C15H20O2) and DE (C15H18O2) could exert their anti-cancer activities mainly by six pathways, including growth inhibition, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis induction, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of invasion and metastasis, differentiation induction and reversal of drug resistance.
Figure 1. Chemical structure and possible anti-cancer mechanisms of Costunolide (CE) and dehydrocostuslactone (DE). CE (C15H20O2) and DE (C15H18O2) could exert their anti-cancer activities mainly by six pathways, including growth inhibition, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis induction, inhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of invasion and metastasis, differentiation induction and reversal of drug resistance.
Ijms 16 10888 g001

3. Experimental Anti-Cancer Activities and Associated Molecular Mechanisms

Carcinogenesis is a multistep process activated by altered expression of oncogenes and transcriptional factors that are involved in cell proliferation, cell cycle regulation, cell apoptosis, cell differentiation, angiogenesis, cell invasion, and metastasis [36]. Increased angiogenic potential, proliferation, invasion and metastasis capacities, accompanied with uncontrolled cell cycle progression and apoptosis inhibition are the hallmark of cancer. Accordingly, the agents targeting one or more of these processes should be ideal cancer chemopreventive agents [37]. A great number of research results supported that CE and DE can exert their anti-cancer activities by various pathways, mainly manifested in inhibition of cancer cell proliferation [5], induction of cancer cell apoptosis and differentiation [9,38], inhibition of metastasis and invasion [11], reversal of multidrug resistance [39], and inhibition of angiogenesis [40] (Figure 1).

4. Inhibition Effect on Cancer Cell Proliferation

4.1. Modulation of Cell Cycle Progression

The unlimited growth of cancer cells is closely associated with the uncontrolled cell cycle regulation mechanism. The cell cycle is regulated by a complex network consisting of positive and negative cell cycle regulatory molecules, such as cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), and Cdk inhibitors [41]. CE and DE treatments have been shown to inhibit the proliferation of various cancer cells, including human hepatocellular carcinoma HA22T/VGH cells [5], ovarian cancer OVCAR3 [7] and SK-OV-3 cells [9], bladder cancer T24 cells [13], breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells [42], gastric adenocarcinoma SGC-7901 cells [43], soft tissue sarcomas SW-872, SW-982 and TE-671 cells [44].
Most studies indicate that CE and DE inhibit cell cycle progression through an increase of the G2/M phase combined with a depletion of the G0/G1 phase in various cancer cells. It is observed that CE arrests bladder cancer T24 cell cycle at G2/M phase, and the proportion at the G2/M phase is increased from 13.78% ± 1.26% in the control group to 25.64% ± 2.16% and 41.32% ± 2.66% in the CE-treated group at the dose of 25 and 50 μM for 24 h, respectively [13]. CE can reduce the expression of cyclin B1 and Cdc2, and increase the expression of p21AWF1 and the binding Cdc2-p21AWF1, independent of p53 pathway in p53-mutant MDA-MB-231 cells, resulting in G2/M arrest [42]. In addition, CE can markedly up-regulate the expression of phosphorylated Chk2 (Thr 68), phosphorylated Cdc25c (Ser 216), phosphorylated Cdk1 (Tyr 15) and cyclin B1 in HA22T/VGH cells, which lead to cell arrest at mitosis, not G2 phase [5].
Studies from Choi et al. demonstrated that DE induces G2/M phase arrest in human ovarian cancer SK-OV-3 cells through up-regulation of p21, down-regulation of Cdk1 as well as cyclin A and cyclin B, which combine with Cdk1 in controlling the G2/M transition [9]. Lohberge et al. reported that DE arrest cells at the G2/M phase and cause a decrease in the expression of Cdk2, Cdc2 (Cdk1) and cyclin B1 in human soft tissue sarcoma cells. In addition, a few studies indicated that DE also induces S and G0/G1 arrest in cancer cells [45]. Kuo and Kretschmer et al. investigated that DE blocks S-phase progression through Cdk inhibitor up-regulation and cyclin inhibition pathways [23,44]. Moreover, Wang et al. reported that DE causes G0/G1 phase arrest by decreasing the expression of cyclinD1 and Cdk2 in human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) [46]. Similar results were also reported in human prostate cancer cells [47]. These studies suggested that regulation of cell cycle-associated regulatory factors is one of the mechanisms of CE and DE in prevention and therapeutic intervention of cancer (Figure 2).
Interestingly, many secondary metabolites in plants can modulate the cell cycle progression through the activation of p53/p21/p27 pathway [48,49]. It is well documented that secondary metabolites can act on the redox equilibrium of mammalian cells in in vitro experiments [50,51]. Lee et al. [52] and Choi et al. [9] reported that CE and DE can deplete intracellular thiols and lead to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, which will induce DNA damage and cancer cell apoptosis. p53 is a well-known tumor suppressor protein and its activation and accumulation in the nucleus in cells are always accompanied by the occurrence of DNA damage in cells. Of the p53 targets, the p21 and p27 Cdk inhibitors are the most investigated genes because of their ability to induce cell cycle arrest. An increase in p21 or p27 can be easily associated with changes in cell cycle arrest, including G0/G1, S or G2/M phase block [53]. Taken together, the activation of p53/p21/p27 is a very common mechanism of anti-cancer activity for secondary metabolites in plants.
Ijms 16 10888 g002 1024
Figure 2. The mechanism of Costunolide (CE) or/and dehydrocostuslactone (DE)-induced cell cycle arrest. CE or/and DE inhibit cell cycle progression mainly through an increase of G2/M phase and S phase. ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; ATR, ATM and Rad3-related; Chk, checkpoint kinases; Cdc, cell division cycle protein.
Figure 2. The mechanism of Costunolide (CE) or/and dehydrocostuslactone (DE)-induced cell cycle arrest. CE or/and DE inhibit cell cycle progression mainly through an increase of G2/M phase and S phase. ATM, ataxia telangiectasia mutated; Cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; ATR, ATM and Rad3-related; Chk, checkpoint kinases; Cdc, cell division cycle protein.
Ijms 16 10888 g002

4.2. Influence of Tubulin Polymerization

Microtubules composed of α- and β-tubulin heterodimers, the main ingredients of the cell cytoskeleton, play a crucial part in diverse cellular functions, such as intracellular transport, metabolism, cell shape, migration, and so on. Therefore, they have long been considered as an important target for cancer therapy [54,55,56]. Currently, taxanes and vinca alkaloids have been used as tubulin-targeting anticancer drugs, and their anti-cancer mechanisms might be associated with restructuring and reorganizing microtubules [57]. It has been reported that CE can selective target detyrosinated tubulin, in turn reduce the frequency of microtentacles and inhibit tumor cell reattachment independent of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) activation. More interestingly, CE can decrease detyrosinated microtubules without disrupting the overall microtubule network, therefore, it presents a novel anti-cancer activity, low toxicity and therapeutic potential for breast cancer therapy [58]. Studies from Bocca et al. demonstrated that CE can exert a dose-dependent antiproliferative activity in the human breast cancer MCF-7 cells as a microtubule-interacting agent. After treatment with 100 nM of CE, the size of cells varies and the microtubules appear as a fine network of dense and unaligned fibers [59]. These studies demonstrated that CE can be related to an interaction with microtubules and inhibits the proliferation of cancer cells.

4.3. Inhibition of Telomerase Activity

The human telomerase complexes are comprised of telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT), telomerase RNA components (hTR) and other telomerase proteins, however hTERT, a specialized ribonucleoprotein, is the key component of telomerase, which plays an important part in cell proliferation as a protective mechanism against end-replication problems by adding TTAGGG repeats to the telomeres [60,61]. Compared with normal cells, most cancer cells have high telomerase activity, which leads to enduring proliferation of the cancer cells and development of malignant tumors [62,63]. Therefore, telomerase has been considered as a possible target for cancer therapy. In the present study, Choi demonstrated that CE inhibits the growth of breast cancer MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells by down-regulation of hTERT and transcriptional factors c-Myc and Sp1, and inhibition of telomerase activity [64]. In addition, CE induced apoptosis and suppression of hTERT via the receptor-mediated pathway in human leukemia NALM-6 cells [65]. Thus, CE could potentially be used to study the molecular mechanism of inhibition of telomerase, as well as for preclinical and clinical studies aimed at telomerase targeting.

4.4. Induction of Cell Apoptosis

Apoptosis, also known as programmed cell death, is a ubiquitous and highly regulated mechanism, involving an energy-dependent cascade of molecular events [66]. The morphological features of apoptosis can be characterized as cell shrinkage and convolution, pyknosis and karyorrhexis, intact cell membrane and cytoplasm retained in apoptotic bodies [67]. To date, research indicates that there are at least three CE- and/or DE-induced apoptotic pathways: (i) The mitochondria-dependent “intrinsic” cytochrome C/caspase-9 pathway; (ii) The death receptor-mediated “extrinsic” caspase-8 pathway; and (iii) the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway [6,68,69]. The three pathways are linked in that molecules in one pathway can influence the other [67,70] (Figure 3).

4.5. The Mitochondria-Dependent Intrinsic Pathway

Non-receptor-mediated stimuli, such as toxins, hypoxia, hyperthermia, viral infections, and the absence of certain growth factors and hormones, can cause an opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT) pore, and loss of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential, which results in releasing two main groups of normally sequestered pro-apoptotic proteins from the intermembrane space into the cytosol and triggering the intrinsic signaling pathways of apoptosis [71,72,73,74]. The BCL-2 family of proteins, including the anti-apoptotic proteins, BCL-2, BCL-X, BCL-XL, and so on, and the pro-apoptotic proteins, BAX, BAK, BID, BAD, etc., control apoptotic mitochondrial events by regulating mitochondrial membrane permeability [67,75]. Resistance to apoptosis is a hallmark of cancer [76]. Accumulating research findings demonstrated that CE and DE exert anti-cancer effects by inducing apoptosis in different type of cancers. Kim et al. showed that DE can dose-dependently induce apoptosis in DU145 human prostate cancer cells by activation of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and caspases 8, 9, 7, and 3 and increasing the expression of the pro-apoptotic proteins [11]. Choi et al. reported that there is a marked increase in the expression of the apoptotic protein BAX and the downstream target p53, causing the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria, and in turn, triggering the intrinsic signaling pathways of apoptosis in DE-treated SK-OV-3 ovarian cancer cells [9]. Oh et al. demonstrated that DE inhibits nuclear transcription factor-κB (NF-κB) activation and enhances caspase-8 and caspase-3 activities to render HL-60 cells susceptible to tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-induced apoptosis [77]. It is also reported that DE induces apoptosis in human leukemia HL-60 cells by activating caspase-3 after a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential [78]. In addition, DE inhibits survival signaling through the Janus tyrosine kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (STAT3) signaling and induces apoptosis in breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells by up-regulation of BAX and BAD, down-regulation of BCL-2 and BCL-XL, and nuclear relocation of the mitochondrial factors apoptosis-inducing factor and Endo G [23].
Ijms 16 10888 g003 1024
Figure 3. Costunolide (CE) or/and Dehydrocostuslactone (DE)-induced cell apoptosis pathways. CE and/or DE induce cell apoptosis mainly through the mitochondria-dependent “intrinsic” cytochrome C/caspase-9 pathway, the death receptor-mediated “extrinsic” caspase-8 pathway, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway. The three pathways are linked in that molecules in one pathway can influence the other. ARF, alterative reading frame; TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), TNF receptor-associated death domain; FADD, Fas-associated death domain; RIP, Receptor-interacting protein; BAX, BCL-2 associated X protein; BID, BH3 interacting domain death agonist; BAD, BCL-2 antagonist of cell death; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma protein 2; MPT, mitochondrial permeability transition; 14-3-3, Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan; JNK, c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase; ERK, extracellular signal regulated kinase; IRE1, inositol-requiring protein 1; PERK, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; AIF, apoptosis-inducing factor; Endo G, endonuclease G; XBP-1, X-box transcription factor-1; eIF-2, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-2.
Figure 3. Costunolide (CE) or/and Dehydrocostuslactone (DE)-induced cell apoptosis pathways. CE and/or DE induce cell apoptosis mainly through the mitochondria-dependent “intrinsic” cytochrome C/caspase-9 pathway, the death receptor-mediated “extrinsic” caspase-8 pathway, and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway. The three pathways are linked in that molecules in one pathway can influence the other. ARF, alterative reading frame; TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), TNF receptor-associated death domain; FADD, Fas-associated death domain; RIP, Receptor-interacting protein; BAX, BCL-2 associated X protein; BID, BH3 interacting domain death agonist; BAD, BCL-2 antagonist of cell death; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma protein 2; MPT, mitochondrial permeability transition; 14-3-3, Tyrosine 3-monooxygenase/tryptophan; JNK, c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase; ERK, extracellular signal regulated kinase; IRE1, inositol-requiring protein 1; PERK, double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase; AIF, apoptosis-inducing factor; Endo G, endonuclease G; XBP-1, X-box transcription factor-1; eIF-2, eukaryotic translation initiation factor-2.
Ijms 16 10888 g003
Lee et al. found that CE induces HL-60 human leukemia cells apoptosis by ROS-mediated mitochondrial permeability transition and cytochrome C release, and this apoptotic pathway associated with the generation of ROS and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψm) can be blocked by the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine [52]. Similar apoptotic mechanism is also observed in the CE-treated T24 human bladder cancer cells [13] and CE-treated platinum-resistant human ovarian cancer cells [39]. Furthermore, CE can trigger apoptosis by depleting intracellular thiols. Pretreatment with sulfhydryl compounds such as GSH, N-acetyl-l-cysteine, dithiothreitol and 2-mercaptoethanol almost completely blocked the CE-induced apoptosis, and overexpression of BCL-2 also significantly attenuated the effects of CE [68]. Further studies show that ROS-mediated c-Jun N-Terminal Kinase (JNK) activation plays a key role in CE-induced apoptosis in U937 cells [79]. Kim et al. suggested that CE induces apoptosis in 11Z human endometriotic epithelial cells by inhibiting the prosurvival NF-κB and Akt pathway, leading to the down-regulation of anti-apoptotic protein BCL-XL and the activation of caspases [80].

4.6. The Death Receptor-Mediated Extrinsic Pathway

The extrinsic signaling pathways initiating apoptosis involve transmembrane receptor-mediated interactions. So far, the best-characterized ligand and corresponding death receptor models include FasL/FasR, TNF-α/TNFR1, Apo3L/DR3, Apo2L/DR4 and Apo2L/DR5 [81,82,83], of which, the first two models can best depict the sequence of events which define the extrinsic phase of apoptosis. The binding of Fas or TNF ligand to Fas or TNF receptor, respectively, will result in formation of a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC), including the TNF receptor-associated death domain (TRADD), Fas-associated death domain (FADD) and Receptor-interacting protein (RIP), in cytoplasm, and the autocatalytic activation of procaspase-8. Once caspase-8 is activated, the execution phase of apoptosis is triggered [84,85]. Choi found that CE induces apoptosis in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells through the extrinsic pathway, characterized as the activation of Fas, caspase-8, caspase-3, and degradation of PARP without disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential and changes in the expression of Bcl-2 and Bax proteins [42]. Moreover, Kanno et al. suggested that CE-induced apoptosis in human B cell leukemia NALM-6 cells do not change Fas-associated factor 1 (FAF1), but increase the phosphorylation of Fas-associated death domain (FADD) at serine 194. Moreover, CE treatment can time-dependently activate caspase-8 and -9 and degrade PARP in cells. Pretreatment of cells with caspase-3, -8, and broad-spectrum caspase inhibitors, can significantly block CE-induced apoptosis, but the caspase-9 inhibitor fails to block apoptosis [65].

4.7. The ER Stress Pathway

The ER, a central organelle involved in lipid synthesis, protein folding, and maturation, plays a crucial role in the regulation of apoptosis. Toxic insults, such as hypoxia, Ca2+ overload, failure of protein synthesis, folding, transport or degradation, can disturb the ER function and result in ER stress, which triggers several specific signaling pathways associated with apoptosis [86,87,88]. Hsu et al. found that DE induces apoptosis in liver cancer HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells by increase of Ca2+ mobilization and activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and p38, which subsequently causes c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) activation and results in AIF and Endo G nuclear relocation, triggering apoptosis [6]. The results of Hung et al. demonstrated that DE induced-apoptosis in human non-small cell lung A549 and NCI-H460 cells also follows the ER stress pathway, characterized by changes in cytosol-Ca2+ levels, PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) phosphorylation, and caspase-4 activation. The release of Ca2+ triggered the production of ROS, which further enhances Ca2+ overloading and subsequently activates p38, JNK and ERK1/2 [89].

4.8. Anti-Cancer Metastasis and Invasion

Tumor recurrence and metastasis is the main cause of death in cancer patients, and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are assumed to play a major role in changing the tumor microenvironment affecting tumor growth, progression, invasion, metastasis and angiogenesis. Therefore, MMPs have been considered as novel therapeutic targets for cancer treatment [90,91,92,93]. MMP-9 can degrade collagen IV and V of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and gelatin. The change of its expression is closely related to tumor metastasis in various tumors [94]. It was documented that DE inhibits MMP-9 secretion and stimulates TIMP-2 secretion to reduce migration of DU145 and TRAMP-C2 cells [11]. In addition, MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels are significantly reduced in human soft tissue sarcoma TE-671 cells with DE treatment, but significantly increased in SW-982 and TE-671 cells with CE treatment. Interestingly, CE and DE both can significantly reduce the invasion potential of cancer cells. These results indicate that the anti-metastasis mechanism of CE may be different from that of DE [45]. Choi et al. investigated the anti-cancer effects of CE and its underlying mechanisms against TNFα-induced breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells migration and invasion. They found that administration of CE compared to the control, inhibits the growth of tumors and their metastases. The mechanism may be associated with a decrease of P-IKK, P-IKB, and Nuclear p65 in NF-κB signalling pathways [95].

5. Reversion of Multidrug Resistance

Drug resistance, including primary drug resistance (PDR) and multiple drug resistance (MDR), is the primary reasons for the failure of cancer chemotherapy in cancer patients. MDR is closely associated with the expression of ATP binding cassette transporters, such as ABCB1/MDR1, ABCC1/MRP1, and ABCG2/BCRP1 [96,97,98,99]. Current research demonstrated that DE inhibits the growth of three kinds of chemo-resistant cancer cells (IC50 lower than 10 μg/mL) by reducing the expression of ABCB1/MDR1 and ABCG2/BCRP1, indicating that this compound has a potential to circumvent multidrug resistance in these cells [44]. In addition, it was also reported that CE is more potent than cisplatin in inhibiting cell growth in three platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines (MPSC1PT, A2780PT, and SKOV3PT), moreover, it functions with cisplatin to induce cell death in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer cells [39]. Taken together, these data suggested that CE, as well as DE, alone or in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents, may be of therapeutic potential in chemo-resistant cancer.

6. Anti-Angiogenic Activity

Tumor angiogenesis plays a crucial role in tumor growth and metastasis [100,101]. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a most powerful tumor angiogenesis factor, which can interact with its cognate receptors, KDR/Flk-1 and Flt-1 to promote the growth of new blood vessels. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis by blocking angiogenesis-related factors has become a potential therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment [102]. Hao et al. demonstrated that CE and DE inhibit the growth and survival of human lung cancer A549 cells and the expression of VEGF with a non-toxic concentration [40]. In addition, CE can inhibit angiogenic response in vitro and in vivo by blocking the, VEGFR KDR/Flk-1 angiogenic factor signaling pathway [103]. Similar results were reported that DE can inhibit human umbilical vein endothelial cell proliferation and capillary-like tube formation in vitro, moreover, it also showed an anti-angiogenic effect in the matrigel-plug nude mice model [46]. These studies suggested that CE and DE are potent angiogenesis inhibitors with a potential to be adopted as a novel agents in anticancer therapy.

7. Induction of Cancer Cell Differentiation

Most cancer cells persist in a highly proliferative state and thus outgrow their normal cellular counterparts due to their lack of capacity to mature into non-replicating adult cells. Therefore, chemical or biological inducers of terminal differentiation represent an alternative approach to the treatment of cancer [104]. Cell differentiation is closely related to the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) signaling pathways [105,106,107]. Studies from Kim et al. demonstrated that CE combined with 1,25-(OH)2 Vitamin D3 induces HL-60 cells differentiation via activation of a variety of protein kinases including PKC, MAPK and PI3-K and deactivating NF-κB [38]. In addition, Choi et al. showed that CE-treated HL-60 cells can develop the characteristics of differentiated cells, and approximately 80% of the CE-treated cells become stainable with nitroblue-tetrazolium, compared to only 13.2% of the untreated cells. The mechanisms may be associated with the increased expression of both membrane antigens CD14 and CD66b [108]. It was reported that CE increase all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced HL-60 cell differentiation into a granulocytic lineage by inhibiting NF-κB DNA-binding activity. Signaling kinases PKC, ERK, JNK and PI3-K are also involved in the ATRA-induced differentiation enhanced by CE [109]. Therefore, CE can be thought to be a potential inducer of cancer cell differentiation.

8. Anti-Tumor Activity, Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of CE and DE in Vivo

The evaluation of anti-tumor activity of drug candidates in animal models is crucial for determining whether they are worth being carried out further in preclinical and clinical studies. Choi et al. found that the administration of CE (intraperitoneally once a day for seven days) significantly suppresses tumor growth and increases survival in a 3LL Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing model. Furthermore, there is no weight loss in non-tumor-bearing mice treated with CE (7.5 mg/kg) [79]. It was also reported that the intraperitoneal administration of CE at the dose of 5 or 10 mg/kg/day body weight for 10 days can significantly inhibit the growth of platinum-resistant SKOV3PT as compared with vehicle controls [39]. Results of Kuo and Chio et al. indicated that CE or DE significantly inhibits MDA-MB-231 xenograft growth and metastases without causing any side effects to the mice [23,95]. Hsu and Hung et al. suggested that DE may be a novel anticancer agent for the treatment of liver cancer and non-small cell lung cancer based on animal studies both revealing a dramatic 50% reduction in tumor volume after 45 and 28 days of treatment, respectively [6,89]. Moreover, Wang et al. reported that DE significantly inhibits neo-vascularization in a concentration-dependent manner, demonstrating that it has potential inhibitory activity in growth factors-induced angiogenesis in vivo [46]. Recently, Peng et al. found that CE combined with DE exerts a synergistic anti-cancer effect on breast cancer MCF-7 xenografts [110].
As described above, numerous preclinical studies indicated that CE and DE are novel anticancer agents for prevention and therapy of cancer. Therefore, studies on potential pharmacokinetics and metabolism are essential for better translating such promising observations into clinic. Within the past several years, to the best of our knowledge, only a few groups have evaluated the pharmacokinetics of CE and DE in vivo. A sensitive UPLC-MS/MS for the quantification of CE and DE in biological matrices has been developed by Hu et al. and successfully used to analyze the pharmacokinetics of the two compounds [111]. After oral administration of the mix at a single dose at 125 mg/kg mixed solution (containing 25 mg CE and 100 mg DE) to Wistar rats, peak concentrations of CE and DE were 0.024 ± 0.004 and 0.063 ± 0.002 mg/L (Cmax) reach 9.0 ± 1.5 and 6.0 ± 1.1 h (Tmax), respectively. The half-life (t1/2) and area under plasma concentration (AUC0–48) were found to be 4.97 ± 1.07 and 5.44 ± 1.13 h, and 0.33 ± 0.03 and 1.09 ± 0.15 mg/L/h, respectively. Moreover, Zhang et al. studied the pharmacokinetic of CE and DE after oral administration of traditional medicine Aucklandia lappa Decne by LC/MS/MS. The pharmacokinetic parameters are as follows: Tmax is 10.46 and 12.39 h for CE and DE, respectively. The t1/2 of CE and DE was calculated to be 5.54 ± 0.81 and 4.32 ± 0.71 h, respectively and the AUC of CE and DE was found to be 308.83 and 7884.51 ng·h/mL, respectively [112]. CE and DE are very poorly absorbed in rats after oral administration due to their poor water solubility. Therefore, Peng et al. investigated the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of the two compounds in rats after a single intravenous administration [113]. The Cmax of CE and DE were observed to be 12.29 ± 1.47 and 5.79 ± 0.13 μg/mL, respectively, and the AUC(0–∞) of CE and DE were calculated to be 3.11 ± 0.13 and 1.37 ± 0.10 μg h/mL, respectively. The t1/2 of CE and DE are 1.16 ± 0.06 and 2.33 ± 0.58 h, respectively. Further, four metabolites of CE and six metabolites of DE were discovered from the plasma, urine and feces of rats by an ultraperformance liquid chromatography/quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry system (UPLC-Q/TOF MS). In addition, they found that the main metabolic pathway of DE and CE is phase І and II biotransformation, respectively. The information may be useful for the further development of the two drug candidates.

9. Conclusions and Future Prospects

This review briefly summarizes the anti-tumor mechanisms and activities of CE and DE. Taken together, these results strengthen the hypothesis that the two compounds could exert multi-targeted chemopreventive effects by blocking different stages of carcinogenesis and progression with a safe pharmacological effect. Although there have been massive studies on anti-cancer activity and associated molecular mechanisms of CE and DE, it is noteworthy that current research lacks systematic evaluation. The targeting proteins of CE and/or DE are not fully clarified, and the number of multicenter, large sample, double-blind, and randomized chemoprevention clinical trials with CE and/or DE are very few. Therefore, their antitumor activities and mechanisms need be further studied. CE and DE usually coexist in medicinal plants, such as Saussurea lappa and Laurus nobilis, and they have similar chemical properties, moreover, the combination treatment of CE and DE showed a synergistic anti-cancer effect. Therefore, we think combination of the two compounds are likely to be more attractive anticancer agents than CE or DE alone, and simultaneously extraction of the two compounds from their natural sources may be more valuable than chemical synthesis of CE or DE alone.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Plan Project of Shanghai Outstanding Academic Leaders (13XD1400300), the National Significant Science and Technology Special Projects of New Drugs Creation (2014ZX09101003), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81370552).

Author Contributions

Xuejing Lin collected the materials of references; Zhangxiao Peng and Changqing Su wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koehn, F.E.; Carter, G.T. The evolving role of natural products in drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2005, 4, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pan, L.; Chai, H.; Kinghorn, A.D. The continuing search for antitumor agents from higher plants. Phytochem. Lett. 2010, 3, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. DeVita, V.T.; Hellman, S.; Rosenberg, S.A. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology, 8th ed.; Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  4. Butturini, E.; Cavalieri, E.; de Prati, A.C.; Darra, E.; Rigo, A.; Shoji, K.; Murayama, N.; Yamazaki, H.; Watanabe, Y.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Two naturally occurring terpenes, dehydrocostuslactone and costunolide, decrease intracellular GSH content and inhibit STAT3 activation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, C.Y.; Chang, H.S.; Chen, I.S.; Chen, C.J.; Hsu, M.L.; Fu, S.L.; Chen, Y.J. Costunolide causes mitotic arrest and enhances radiosensitivity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Radiat. Oncol. 2011, 6, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Hsu, Y.L.; Wu, L.Y.; Kuo, P.L. Dehydrocostuslactone, a medicinal plant-derived sesquiterpene lactone, induces apoptosis coupled to endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver cancer cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 329, 808–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Choi, E.J.; Kim, G.H. Evaluation of anticancer activity of dehydrocostuslactone in vitro. Mol. Med. Rep. 2010, 3, 185–188. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Pitchai, D.; Roy, A.; Banu, S. In vitro and in silico evaluation of NF-κB targeted costunolide action on estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells-a comparison with normal breast cells. Phytother. Res. 2014, 28, 1499–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Choi, E.J.; Ahn, W.S. Antiproliferative effects of dehydrocostuslactone through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human ovarian cancer SK-OV-3 cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2009, 23, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sun, C.M.; Syu, W.J.; Don, M.J.; Lu, J.J.; Lee, G.H. Cytotoxic sesquiterpene lactones from the root of Saussurea lappa. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1175–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kim, E.J.; Lim, S.S.; Park, S.Y.; Shin, H.K.; Kim, J.S.; Park, J.H. Apoptosis of DU145 human prostate cancer cells induced by dehydrocostus lactone isolated from the root of Saussurea lappa. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 3651–3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, E.J.; Hong, J.E.; Lim, S.S.; Kwon, G.T.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, K.W.; Park, J.H. The hexane extract of Saussurea lappa and its active principle, dehydrocostus lactone, inhibit prostate cancer cell migration. J. Med. Food 2012, 15, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rasul, A.; Bao, R.; Malhi, M.; Zhao, B.; Tsuji, I.; Li, J.; Li, X. Induction of apoptosis by costunolide in bladder cancer cells is mediated through ROS generation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Molecules 2013, 18, 1418–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Robinson, A.; Kumar, T.V.; Sreedhar, E.; Naidu, V.G.; Krishna, S.R.; Babu, K.S.; Srinivas, P.V.; Rao, J.M. A new sesquiterpene lactone from the roots of Saussurea lappa: Structure–anticancer activity study. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 4015–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Peng, Z.X.; Wang, Y.; Gu, X.; Wen, Y.Y.; Yan, C. A platform for fast screening potential anti-breast cancer compounds in traditional Chinese medicines. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2013, 27, 1759–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cateni, F.; Zilic, J.; Zacchigna, M.; Bonivento, P.; Frausin, F.; Scarcia, V. Synthesis and biological properties of new α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones and α, β-unsaturated δ-lactones. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P.G.; Tabrizi, M.A.; Bermejo, J.; Estévez, F.; Borgatti, M.; Gambari, R. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of hybrid molecules containing α-methylene-γ-butyrolactones and α-bromoacryloyl moieties. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7906–7910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, L.; Zhao, F.; He, E.Q.; Wang, S.; Xu, H.; Liu, K. Effects of eighteen sesquiterpenes from Saussurea lappa on the proliferation of six human cancer cell lines. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2008, 20, 808–812. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cho, J.Y.; Park, J.; Yoo, E.S.; Baik, K.U.; Jung, J.H.; Lee, J.; Park, M.H. Inhibitory effect of sesquiterpene lactones from Saussurea lappa on tumor necrosis factor-α production in murine macrophage like cells. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 594–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jeong, G.S.; Pae, H.O.; Jeong, S.O.; Kim, Y.C.; Kwon, T.O.; Lee, H.S.; Kim, N.S.; Park, S.D.; Chung, H.T. The α-methylene-γ-butyrolactone moiety in dehydrocostus lactone is responsible for cytoprotective heme oxygenase-1 expression through activation of the nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 in HepG2 cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 565, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Butturini, E.; di Paola, R.; Suzuki, H.; Paterniti, I.; Ahmad, A.; Mariotto, S.; Cuzzocrea, S. Costunolide and dehydrocostuslactone, two natural sesquiterpene lactones, ameliorate the inflammatory process associated to experimental pleurisyinmice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 730, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kassuya, C.A.; Cremoneze, A.; Barros, L.F.; Simas, A.S.; Lapa, F.R.; Mello-Silva, R.; Stefanello, M.E.; Zampronio, A.R. Antipyretic and anti-inflammatory properties of the ethanolic extract, dichloromethane fraction and costunolide from Magnolia ovata (Magnoliaceae). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 124, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kuo, P.L.; Ni, W.C.; Tsai, E.M.; Hsu, Y.L. Dehydrocostuslactone disrupts signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 through up-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling in breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 1328–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Park, S.H.; Choi, S.U.; Lee, C.O.; Yoo, S.E.; Yoon, S.K.; Kim, Y.K.; Ryu, S.Y. Costunolide, a sesquiterpene from the stem bark of Magnolia sieboldii, inhibits the RAS-farnesyl-proteintransferase. Planta Med. 2001, 67, 358–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, H.C.; Chou, C.K.; Lee, S.D.; Wang, J.C.; Yeh, S.F. Active compounds from Saussurea lappa Clarks that suppress hepatitis B virus surface antigen gene expression in human hepatoma cells. Antivir. Res. 1995, 27, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, H.K.; Song, H.E.; Lee, H.B.; Kim, C.S.; Koketsu, M.; Ngan, L.T.; Ahn, Y.J. Growth inhibitory, bactericidal, and morphostructural effects of dehydrocostus lactone from Magnolia sieboldii Leaves on antibiotic-susceptible and -resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Duraipandiyan, V.; Al-Harbi, N.A.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Muthukumar, C. Antimicrobial activity of sesquiterpene lactones isolated from traditional medicinal plant, Costus speciosus (Koen ex.Retz.) Sm. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Barrero, A.F.; Oltra, J.E.; Alvarez, M.; Raslan, D.S.; Saude, D.A.; Akssira, M. New sources and antifungal activity of sesquiterpene lactones. Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Eliza, J.; Daisy, P.; Ignacimuthu, S. Antioxidant activity of costunolide and eremanthin isolated from Costus speciosus (Koen ex.Retz) Sm. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2010, 188, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Seo, M.S.; Choi, E.M. The effects of dehydrocostus lactone on osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells in redox changes and PI3K/Akt/CREB. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2012, 34, 810–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Upadhyay, O.P.; Singh, R.H.; Dutta, S.K. Studies on antidiabetic medicinal plants used in Indian folklore. Aryavaidyan 1996, 9, 159–167. [Google Scholar]
  32. Sutar, N.; Garai, R.; Sharma, U.S.; Singh, N.; Roy, S.D. Antiulcerogenic activity of Saussurea lappa root. Int. J. Pharm. Life Sci. 2011, 2, 516–520. [Google Scholar]
  33. Seki, K.; Hashimoto, A.; Kobayashi, H.; Kawahara, Y.; Yamahara, J. Motility inhibitory effect on Anchusan and Jintan and its active components in Anisakis type larvae. Yakuri Chiryo 1991, 19, 265–289. [Google Scholar]
  34. Triana, J.; López, M.; Rico, M.; González-Platas, J.; Quintana, J.; Estévez, F.; León, F.; Bermejo, J. Sesquiterpenoid derivatives from Gonospermum elegans and their cytotoxic activity for HL-60 human promyelocytic cells. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 943–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Triana, J.; Eiroa, J.L.; Ortega, J.J.; León, F.; Brouard, I.; Torres, F.; Quintana, J.; Estévez, F.; Bermejo, J. Sesquiterpene lactones from Gonospermum gomerae and G. fruticosum and their cytotoxic activities. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 2015–2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ramasamy, K.; Agarwal, R. Multitargeted therapy of cancer by silymarin. Cancer Lett. 2008, 269, 352–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ji, W.; Li, X.; Sun, B.; Gao, Q.; Su, C. Anti-tumor activities of matrine and oxymatrine: Literature review. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 5111–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kim, S.H.; Kang, S.N.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, T.S. Potentiation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells into monocytes by costunolide, a germacranolide sesquiterpene lactone. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yang, Y.I.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.T.; Choi, J.H. Costunolide induces apoptosis in platinum-resistant human ovarian cancer cells by generating reactive oxygen species. Gynecol. Oncol. 2011, 123, 588–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hao, L.J.; Zhao, F.; Gao, Z.T.; Xu, H.; Liu, K. Inhibitory efects of sesquiterpenes from Saussurealappa on the vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat. Prod. Res. Dev. 2010, 22, 687–691. [Google Scholar]
  41. Obaya, A.J.; Sedivy, J.M. Regulation of cyclin-Cdk activity in mammalian cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2002, 59, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Choi, Y.K.; Seo, H.S.; Choi, H.S.; Choi, H.S.; Kim, S.R.; Shin, Y.C.; Ko, S.G. Induction of Fas-mediated extrinsic apoptosis, p21WAF1-related G2/M cell cycle arrest and ROS generation by costunolide in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer cells, MDA-MB-231. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 363, 119–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rasul, A.; Yu, B.; Yang, L.; Arshad, M.; Khan, M.; Ma, T.; Yang, H. Costunolide, a sesquiterpene lactone induces G2/M phase arrest and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in human gastric adenocarcinoma SGC-7901 cells. J. Med. Plants Res. 2012, 6, 1191–1200. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kretschmer, N.; Rinner, B.; Stuendl, N.; Kaltenegger, H.; Wolf, E.; Kunert, O.; Boechzelt, H.; Leithner, A.; Bauer, R.; Lohberger, B. Effect of costunolide and dehydrocostus lactone on cell cycle, apoptosis, and ABC transporter expression in human soft tissue sarcoma. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1749–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lohberger, B.; Rinner, B.; Stuendl, N.; Kaltenegger, H.; Steinecker-Frohnwieser, B.; Bernhart, E.; Rad, B.E.; Weinberg, A.M.; Leithner, A.; Bauer, R.; et al. Sesquiterpene lactones downregulate G2/M cell cycle regulator proteins and affect the invasive potential of human soft tissue sarcoma cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e66300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, C.Y.; Tsai, A.C.; Peng, C.Y.; Chang, Y.L.; Lee, K.H.; Teng, C.M.; Pan, S.L. Dehydrocostuslactone suppresses angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo through inhibition of Akt/GSK-3β and mTOR signaling pathways. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hsu, J.L.; Pan, S.L.; Ho, Y.F.; Hwang, T.L.; Kung, F.L.; Guh, J.H. Costunolide induces apoptosis through nuclear calcium2+ overload and DNA damage response in human prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2011, 185, 1967–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Noh, H.J.; Kim, K.A.; Kim, K.C. p53 down-regulates SETDB1 gene expression during paclitaxel induced-cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 28, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gismondi, A.; Canuti, L.; Impei, S.; di Marco, G.; Kenzo, M.; Colizzi, V.; Canini, A. Antioxidant extracts of African medicinal plants induce cell cycle arrest and differentiation in B16F10 melanoma cells. Int. J. Oncol. 2013, 43, 956–964. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Gismondi, A.; Canuti, L.; Grispo, M.; Canini, A. Biochemical composition and antioxidant properties of Lavandula angustifolia Miller essential oil are shielded by propolis against UV radiations. Photochem. Photobiol. 2014, 90, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Forni, C.; Braglia, R.; Mulinacci, N.; Urbani, A.; Ronci, M.; Gismondi, A.; Tabolacci, C.; Provenzano, B.; Lentini, A.; Beninati, S. Antineoplastic activity of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) crude extracts on B16-F10 melanoma cells. Mol. Biosyst. 2014, 10, 1255–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Lee, M.G.; Lee, K.T.; Chi, S.G.; Park, J.H. Costunolide induces apoptosis by ROS-mediated mitochondrial permeability transition and cytochrome C release. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 24, 303–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Coqueret, O. New roles for p21 and p27 cell-cycle inhibitors: A function for each cell compartment? Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. De Forges, H.; Bouissou, A.; Perez, F. Interplay between microtubule dynamics and intracellular organization. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Nogales, E. Structural insights into microtubule function. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2000, 69, 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Parker, A.L.; Kavallaris, M.; McCarroll, J.A. Microtubules and their role in cellular stress in cancer. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dall Acqua, S. Natural products as antimitotic agents. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2014, 14, 2274–2285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Whipple, R.A.; Vitolo, M.I.; Boggs, A.E.; Charpentier, M.S.; Thompson, K.; Martin, S.S. Parthenolide and costunolide reduce microtentacles and tumor cell attachment by selectively targeting detyrosinated tubulin independent from NF-κB inhibition. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, R83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bocca, C.; Gabriel, L.; Bozzo, F.; Miglietta, A. A sesquiterpene lactone, costunolide, interacts with microtubule protein and inhibits the growth of MCF-7 cells. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2004, 147, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Counter, C.M.; Avilion, A.A.; LeFeuvre, C.E.; Stewart, N.G.; Greider, C.W.; Harley, C.B.; Bacchetti, S. Telomere shortening associated with chromosome instability is arrested in immortal cells which express telomerase activity. EMBO J. 1992, 11, 1921–1929. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Morin, G.B. The human telomere terminal transferase enzyme is a ribonucleoprotein that synthesizes TTAGGG repeats. Cell 1989, 59, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kim, N.W.; Piatyszek, M.A.; Prowse, K.R.; Harley, C.B.; West, M.D.; Ho, P.L.; Coviello, G.M.; Wright, W.E.; Weinrich, S.L.; Shay, J.W. Specific association of human telomerase activity with immortal cells and cancer. Science 1994, 266, 2011–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shay, J.W.; Wright, W.E. Telomerase activity in human cancer. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 1996, 8, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Choi, S.H.; Im, E.; Kang, H.K.; Lee, J.H.; Kwak, H.S.; Bae, Y.T.; Park, H.J.; Kim, N.D. Inhibitory effects of costunolide on the telomerase activity in human breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2005, 227, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kanno, S.; Kitajima, Y.; Kakuta, M.; Osanai, Y.; Kurauchi, K.; Ujibe, M.; Ishikawa, M. Costunolide-induced apoptosis is caused by receptor-mediated pathway and inhibition of telomerase activity in NALM-6 cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2008, 31, 1024–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Degterev, A.; Boyce, M.; Yuan, J. A decade of caspases. Oncogene 2003, 22, 8543–8567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Elmore, S. Apoptosis: A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol. Pathol. 2007, 35, 495–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Hengartner, M.O. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature 2000, 407, 770–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Spencer, S.L.; Sorger, P.K. Measuring and modeling apoptosis in single cells. Cell 2011, 144, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, Y.; Sun, S.; Chen, J.; Ren, P.; Hu, Y.; Cao, Z.; Sun, H.; Ding, Y. Oxymatrine induces mitochondria dependent apoptosis in human osteosarcoma MNNG/HOS cells through inhibition of PI3K/Akt pathway. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Saelens, X.; Festjens, N.; Vande Walle, L.; van Gurp, M.; van Loo, G.; Vandenabeele, P. Toxic proteins released from mitochondria in cell death. Oncogene 2004, 23, 2861–2874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Garrido, C.; Galluzzi, L.; Brunet, M.; Puig, P.E.; Didelot, C.; Kroemer, G. Mechanisms of cytochrome c release from mitochondria. Cell Death Differ. 2006, 13, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ekert, P.G.; Vaux, D.L. The mitochondrial death squad: Hardened killers or innocent bystanders? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2005, 17, 626–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Susin, S.A.; Daugas, E.; Ravagnan, L.; Samejima, K.; Zamzami, N.; Loeffler, M.; Costantini, P.; Ferri, K.F.; Irinopoulou, T.; Prévost, M.C.; et al. Two distinct pathways leading to nuclear apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 2000, 192, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cory, S.; Adams, J.M. The Bcl2 family: Regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2002, 2, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Bröker, L.E.; Kruyt, F.A.; Giaccone, G. Cell death independent of caspases: A review. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11, 3155–3162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Oh, G.S.; Pae, H.O.; Chung, H.T.; Kwon, J.W.; Lee, J.H.; Kwon, T.O.; Kwon, S.Y.; Chon, B.H.; Yun, Y.G. Dehydrocostus lactone enhances tumor necrosis factor-α-induced apoptosis of human leukemia HL-60 cells. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2004, 26, 163–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yun, Y.G.; Oh, H.; Oh, G.S.; Pae, H.O.; Choi, B.M.; Kwon, J.W.; Kwon, T.O.; Jang, S.I.; Chung, H.T. In vitro cytotoxicity of Mokko lactone in human leukemia HL-60 cells: Induction of apoptotic cell death by mitochondrial membrane potential collapse. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 2004, 26, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Choi, J.H.; Lee, K.T. Costunolide-induced apoptosis in human leukemia cells: Involvement of c-jun N-terminal kinase activation. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 1803–1808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Kim, J.H.; Yang, Y.I.; Lee, K.T.; Park, H.J.; Choi, J.H. Costunolide induces apoptosis in human endometriotic cells through inhibition of the prosurvival Akt and nuclear factor κB signaling pathway. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 34, 580–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Chicheportiche, Y.; Bourdon, P.R.; Xu, H.; Hsu, Y.M.; Scott, H.; Hession, C.; Garcia, I.; Browning, J.L. TWEAK, a new secreted ligand in the tumor necrosis factor family that weakly induces apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32401–32410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Ashkenazi, A.; Dixit, V.M. Death receptors: Signaling and modulation. Science 1998, 281, 1305–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Rubio-Moscardo, F.; Blesa, D.; Mestre, C.; Siebert, R.; Balasas, T.; Benito, A.; Rosenwald, A.; Climent, J.; Martinez, J.I.; Schilhabel, M.; et al. Characterization of 8p21.3 chromosomal deletions in B-cell lymphoma: TRAIL-R1and TRAIL-R2 as candidate dosage-dependent tumor suppressor genes. Blood 2005, 106, 3214–3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wajant, H. The Fas signaling pathway: More than a paradigm. Science 2002, 296, 1635–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Kischkel, F.C.; Hellbardt, S.; Behrmann, I.; Germer, M.; Pawlita, M.; Krammer, P.H.; Peter, M.E. Cytotoxicity-dependent APO-1 (Fas/CD95)-associated proteins form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) with the receptor. EMBO J. 1995, 14, 5579–5588. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  86. Feldman, D.E.; Chauhan, V.; Koong, A.C. The unfolded protein response: A novel component of the hypoxic stress response in tumors. Mol. Cancer Res. 2005, 3, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Moenner, M.; Pluquet, O.; Bouchecareilh, M.; Chevet, E. Integrated endoplasmic reticulum stress responses in cancer. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 10631–10634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Yung, H.W.; Korolchuk, S.; Tolkovsky, A.M.; Charnock-Jones, D.S.; Burton, G.J. Endoplasmic reticulum stress exacerbates ischemia-reperfusion-induced apoptosis through attenuation of Akt protein synthesis in human choriocarcinoma cells. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 872–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Hung, J.Y.; Hsu, Y.L.; Ni, W.C.; Tsai, Y.M.; Yang, C.J.; Kuo, P.L.; Huang, M.S. Oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling are involved in dehydrocostuslactone-mediated apoptosis in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Lung Cancer 2010, 68, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Mehlen, P.; Puisieux, A. Metastasis: A question of life or death. Nat. Rev. 2006, 6, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kessenbrock, K.; Plaks, V.; Werb, Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: Regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell 2010, 141, 52–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Bourboulia, D.; Stetler-Stevenson, W.G. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): Positive and negative regulators in tumor cell adhesion. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2010, 20, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Roy, R.; Yang, J.; Moses, M.A. Matrix metalloproteinases as novel biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in human cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 5287–5297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Stamenkovic, I. Matrix metalloproteinases in tumor invasion and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2000, 10, 415–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Choi, Y.K.; Cho, S.G.; Woo, S.M.; Yun, Y.J.; Jo, J.; Kim, W.; Shin, Y.C.; Ko, S.G. Saussurea lappa clarke-derived costunolide prevents TNFα-induced breast cancer cell migration and invasion by inhibiting NF-κB activity. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 9, 362–357. [Google Scholar]
  96. Kuwano, M.; Toh, S.; Uchiumi, T.; Takano, H.; Kohno, K.; Wada, M. Multidrug resistance-associated protein subfamily transporters and drug resistance. Anticancer Drug Des. 1999, 14, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Allen, J.D.; Brinkhuis, R.F.; Wijnholds, J.; Schinkel, A.H. The mouse Bcrp1/Mxr/Abcp gene: Amplification and overexpression in cell lines selected for resistance to ropotecan, mitoxantrone, or doxorubicin. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 4237–4241. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Litman, T.; Druley, T.E.; Stein, W.D.; Bates, S.E. From MDR to MXR: New understanding of multidrug resistance systems, their properties and clinical significance. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58, 931–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Fletcher, J.I.; Haber, M.; Henderson, M.J.; Norris, M.D. ABC transporters in cancer: More than just drug efflux pumps. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Folkman, J. Tumor angiogenesis: Therapeutic implication. N. Engl. J. Med. 1971, 285, 1182–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Folkman, J.; Klagsbrun, M. Angiogenic factor. Science 1987, 235, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Ingber, D.; Fujita, T.; Kishimoto, S.; Sudo, K.; Kanamaru, T.; Brem, H.; Folkman, J. Synthetic analogues of fumagillin that inhibit angiogenesis and suppress tumour growth. Nature 1990, 348, 555–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Jeong, S.J.; Itokawa, T.; Shibuya, M.; Kuwano, M.; Ono, M.; Higuchi, R.; Miyamoto, T. Costunolide, a sesquiterpene lactone from Saussurea lappa, inhibits the VEGFR KDR/Flk-1 signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2002, 187, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Beere, H.M.; Hickman, J.A. Differentiation: A suitable strategy for cancer chemotherapy? Anticancer Drug Des. 1993, 8, 299–322. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  105. Pan, Q.; Granger, J.; O’Connell, T.D.; Somerman, M.J.; Simpson, R.U. Promotion of HL-60 cell differentiation by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 regulation of protein kinase C levels and activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997, 54, 909–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Martell, R.E.; Simpson, R.U.; Hsu, T. Effects of protein kinase inhibitors 1(5-isoquinol inesulfonyl)-2-methylpiperazine dihydrochloride (H-7) and N-(2-guanidinoethyl)-5-isoquinolinesulfonamide hydrochloride (HA1004) on calcitriol-induced differentiation of HL-60 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988, 37, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Wu, X.Z.; Shao, G.Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, X.W.; Wang, Z.Y. Studies on the relationship between protein kinase C and differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells induced by retinoic acid. Leuk. Res. 1989, 13, 869–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Choi, J.; Seo, B.R.; Seo, S.H.; Lee, K.T.; Park, J.H.; Park, H.J.; Choi, J.W.; Itoh, Y.; Miyamoto, K. Costunolide induces differentiation of human leukemia HL-60 cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2002, 25, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kim, S.H.; Danilenko, M.; Kim, T.S. Differential enhancement of leukaemia cell differentiation without elevation of intracellular calcium by plant-derived sesquiterpene lactone compounds. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 155, 814–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Peng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Gu, X.; Xue, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zhou, J.; Chan, Y. Metabolic transformation of breast cancer in a MCF-7 xenograft mouse model and inhibitory effect of volatile oil from Saussurea lappa Decne treatment. Metabolomics 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hu, F.; Feng, S.; Wu, Y.; Bi, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, W. Quantitative analysis of costunolide and dehydrocostuslactone in rat plasma by ultraperformance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2011, 25, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Zhang, J.; Hu, X.; Gao, W.; Qu, Z.; Guo, H.; Liu, Z.; Liu, C. Pharmacokinetic study on costunolide and dehydrocostuslactone after oral administration of traditional medicine Aucklandia lappa Decne. by LC/MS/MS. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 151, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Peng, Z.; Wang, Y.; Gu, X.; Guo, X.; Yan, C. Study on the pharmacokinetics andmetabolism of costunolide and dehydrocostus lactone in rats by HPLC-UV and UPLC-Q-TOF/MS. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2014, 28, 1325–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, X.; Peng, Z.; Su, C. Potential Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Costunolide and Dehydrocostuslactone. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 10888-10906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160510888

AMA Style

Lin X, Peng Z, Su C. Potential Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Costunolide and Dehydrocostuslactone. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2015; 16(5):10888-10906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160510888

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Xuejing, Zhangxiao Peng, and Changqing Su. 2015. "Potential Anti-Cancer Activities and Mechanisms of Costunolide and Dehydrocostuslactone" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16, no. 5: 10888-10906. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms160510888

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop