Next Article in Journal
ARF1 and SAR1 GTPases in Endomembrane Trafficking in Plants
Next Article in Special Issue
Probing Antigen-Antibody Interaction Using Fluorescence Coupled Capillary Electrophoresis
Previous Article in Journal
Pattern-Recognition Receptor Signaling Regulator mRNA Expression in Humans and Mice, and in Transient Inflammation or Progressive Fibrosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of Stromal PlGF Suppresses the Growth of Prostate Cancer Xenografts

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(9), 18148-18180; doi:10.3390/ijms140918148

Emerging Roles of Claudins in Human Cancer
Mi Jeong Kwon 1,2
College of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 702-701, Korea; E-Mail:; Tel.: +82-53-950-8581; Fax: +82-53-950-8557
Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Kyungpook National University, 80 Daehak-ro, Buk-gu, Daegu 702-701, Korea
Received: 12 August 2013; in revised form: 23 August 2013 / Accepted: 27 August 2013 /
Published: 4 September 2013


: Claudins are major integral membrane proteins of tight junctions. Altered expression of several claudin proteins, in particular claudin-1, -3, -4 and -7, has been linked to the development of various cancers. Although their dysregulation in cancer suggests that claudins play a role in tumorigenesis, the exact underlying mechanism remains unclear. The involvement of claudins in tumor progression was suggested by their important role in the migration, invasion and metastasis of cancer cells in a tissue-dependent manner. Recent studies have shown that they play a role in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), the formation of cancer stem cells or tumor-initiating cells (CSCs/TICs), and chemoresistance, suggesting that claudins are promising targets for the treatment of chemoresistant and recurrent tumors. A recently identified claudin-low breast cancer subtype that is characterized by the enrichment of EMT and stem cell-like features is significantly associated with disease recurrence, underscoring the importance of claudins as predictors of tumor recurrence. The critical role of epigenetic mechanisms in the regulation of claudin expression indicates the possible application of epigenetic therapy to target claudins. A better understanding of the emerging role of claudins in CSC/TICs and chemoresistance may help to develop therapies against recurrent cancers.
claudin; cancer; epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT); cancer stem cells or tumor-initiating cells (CSC/TICs); chemoresistance; tumor recurrence; epigenetic regulation

1. Introduction

Claudins are transmembrane proteins and important components of tight junctions (TJs), which are central for the regulation of paracellular permeability and the maintenance of epithelial cell polarity [1,2]. Their expression is altered in various cancers compared to normal tissues, and claudin-1, -3, -4 and -7 are among the most frequently dysregulated members of the claudin family [1,3]. The downregulation of several claudins in cancer is consistent with the disruption of TJs during tumorigenesis. However, claudin overexpression, particularly that of claudin-3 and claudin-4, has been reported in various cancers. The dysregulated expression of claudins in cancer occurs at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels [3]. Recently, accumulating evidence indicates that epigenetic mechanisms including DNA methylation, histone modification or microRNAs (miRNAs) are crucial for the regulation of claudin expression in addition to the previously reported transcriptional regulation by transcription factors [47]. Claudins can play a cancer-promoting or tumor suppressor role in a tissue-dependent manner, and their expression is associated with prognosis in several cancers, suggesting their utility as prognostic factors as well as therapeutic targets [1,3].

One of the main challenges in cancer therapy is overcoming chemoresistance and recurrence after initial treatment, which are partly responsible for the high mortality of several cancers. Recent studies have demonstrated the heterogeneity of tumors and suggested that a small population of cells with self-renewal potential—termed cancer stem cells or tumor-initiating cells (CSC/TICs)—play a crucial role in chemoresistance and recurrence, as well as in tumor formation [8]. This population of cells can be generated from differentiated cells (non-CSC/TICs) through epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) [9]. In light of these observations, the existence of an axis between EMT, CSC/TICs and drug resistance was proposed [9].

Recently, a new claudin-low molecular subtype of breast cancer was identified that is characterized by low expression of tight junction and adherens proteins, including claudin-3, -4 and -7, and E-cadherin (CDH1) [10], and enriched in stem-like and EMT features [11,12]. In accordance with the role of EMT and CSC/TICs in cancer, this subtype is associated with poor prognosis of patients with high-grade invasive ductal breast carcinoma [13]. Furthermore, a growing number of studies suggest that claudins are involved in the regulation of CSC/TICs and chemoresistance [1418]. These observations indicate that claudins may contribute to drug resistance and tumor recurrence through a mechanism involving EMT and CSC/TICs.

This review summarizes current knowledge on the dysregulation of claudins in human cancer and the regulatory mechanisms involved, focusing on epigenetic mechanisms whose importance in the regulation of claudin expression has been supported by recent growing evidence. In addition, the involvement of claudins in tumor progression, in particular their emerging roles in EMT and the formation of CSC/TICs, and the link between claudins, CSC/TICs and drug resistance or tumor recurrence are described. Finally, therapeutic strategies targeting claudins in cancer treatment are briefly discussed. A better understanding of the role of claudins in the regulation of CSC/TICs and chemoresistance may be of value for the design of therapeutic strategies for the treatment of recurrent tumors.

2. Tight Junctions

Tight junctions (TJs), together with adherens junctions and desmosomes, form the apical junctional complex that mediates cell-cell adhesion in epithelial and endothelial cells [19]. While adherens junctions and desmosomes mainly contribute to mechanical adhesion between adjacent cells, TJs are involved in several cellular functions. They play a critical role in the maintenance of cell polarity by forming a boundary between apical and basolateral membranes, and they control paracellular ion flux [19]. In addition, their involvement in various signaling pathways indicates that they function in the regulation of cell proliferation, gene expression and differentiation [1921].

TJs are composed of integral transmembrane and peripheral membrane proteins involved in complex protein-protein interactions [19,21]. The integral transmembrane proteins include occludins, claudins, junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs), which contain a single transmembrane domain, and the single pass membrane proteins Crumbs 3 (CRB3) and coxackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) [19,21]. Tricellulin, a four transmembrane domain protein, was recently identified as a novel integral protein [22]. Peripheral proteins located in cytoplasmic regions include zonula occludens (ZOs) and other PDZ domain-containing proteins, as well as regulatory and signaling proteins that link transmembrane TJ proteins to the cytoskeleton and regulate various signaling pathways [19,20].

Various associated proteins regulate TJ formation and cell polarization by controlling the transcription and localization of other TJ proteins. Two signaling complexes, the CRB3/protein associated with Lin seven 1 (PALS1)/PALS1-associated tight junction protein (PATJ) complex and the cdc42-interacting partitioning defective 3 (Par3)/partitioning defective 6 (Par6)/atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) complex, are important in the regulation of junctional polarity and assembly [21]. In addition to these complexes, scribble complex is also known to regulate cellular polarity and TJ formation in mammalian epithelial cells [23]. Interestingly, a recent study [24] reported that cell polarity regulator scribble regulates TAZ, which is a downstream effector of the hippo pathway and is required for self-renewal and tumorigenic potential of breast CSC/TICs, suggesting a link between cell polarity and hippo pathway in breast cancer cells. This study indicated that EMT-induced scribble delocalization from the cell membrane promotes the acquisition of breast CSC/TIC features by activating TAZ. Rab 13, a member of the small GTPase Rab family of proteins, also plays a role in TJ assembly by regulating the localization of TJ proteins including claudin-1 and ZO-1 to the plasma membrane and the protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent phosphorylation of proteins necessary for TJ barrier function [19].

In addition, TJ proteins are involved in cell proliferation and gene expression by modulating signaling cascades, or by sequestrating transcription factors and cell cycle regulators [20,21]. Occludin is linked to Raf, an effector of Ras signaling, and is also connected to Rho A signaling [21]. Occludin is involved in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)-induced EMT, which requires a loss of cell polarity and disruption of the TJ barrier [19,21]. The ZO-1-associated nucleic acid-binding protein (ZONAB), which is localized in both TJs and nuclei, is a Y-box transcription factor protein that regulates gene transcription and cell proliferation through interaction with the TJ protein ZO-1, the regulator of cell proliferation cell division kinase 4 (CDK4), or with Ras-like GTPase (RalA) proteins [21]. Generally, the assembly of TJs suppresses cell proliferation by inhibiting several proliferation promoting pathways such as Raf-1 signaling and the ZONAB-CDK4 pathway [20].

TJ-associated proteins such as ZO-2, membrane-associated guanylate kinase with inverted domain structure 1 (MAGI-1), and multi-PDZ domain protein 1 (MUPP1) inactivate viral oncogenes, and the interaction between the tumor suppressor PTEN and TJ adaptors—including MAGI-2 and MAGI-3—inhibits protein kinase B/Akt-induced cell invasiveness, suggesting that these TJ proteins play a role in carcinogenesis [19,20]. Changes in the activity of the ZO-2 interacting transcription factor AP-1 are associated with certain cancers, suggesting that TJ-associated signaling is dysregulated in cancer cells [19,25]. The regulation of the expression of the proto-oncogene ErbB2 by ZONAB [19,20] and alterations in the expression of TJ-associated proteins during tumorigenesis further support the possibility that these proteins are involved in tumorigenesis. ZO-1 and ZO-2 expression is altered in some cancers, and ZO-1 expression is associated with the prognosis of breast cancer patients [25]. However, whether these changes can induce tumorigenesis or if they are consequences of tumorigenesis remains unclear. Thus, further studies are needed to determine the role of TJ proteins in carcinogenesis.

3. Claudins

Claudins are major integral membrane proteins of TJs and include 24 family members in mammals [2]. In humans, 23 of the 24 claudin genes (the exception is CLDN13) have been identified (Table 1), while all 24 members have been detected in mice and rats [2]. CLDN genes have few introns and are typically small, i.e., several kilobases (kbs). The human genome contains pairs of CLDN genes that have similar sequences and are located in close proximity, such as CLDN6 and CLDN9 on chromosome 16, CLDN22 and CLDN24 on chromosome 4, CLDN8 and CLDN17 on chromosome 21, and CLDN3 and CLDN4 on chromosome 7 (Table 1). This suggests that some claudin genes were generated by gene duplication, and that adjacent genes may be coordinately regulated [2]. Phylogenetic tree analyses of human claudin proteins also showed sequence similarities between some claudins, such as claudin-22 and claudin-24, claudin-6 and claudin-9, and claudin-3 and claudin-4, whereas other claudins show relatively distant relationships [2].

Most claudin proteins are within the 20–34 kDa size range (Table 1) and are reported to have four transmembrane helices with amino- and carboxyl-terminal tails extending into the cytoplasm [2,26]. In addition, claudin proteins have two extracellular loops; the first extracellular loop contains charged amino acids and plays a crucial role in paracellular ion selectivity [26]. The carboxy-terminal tails of claudins, which mostly differ in size and sequence between different claudin proteins, contain a PDZ-domain-binding motif that allows claudins to interact directly with cytoplasmic TJ-associated proteins such as ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3, and MUPP1. Moreover, this tail region is the site of post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, which can affect the localization and functions of claudins. Phosphorylation of claudin-1 by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) [27] or protein kinase C (PKC) [28], and cyclic AMP (cAMP)-induced phosphorylation of claudin-5 [29] promote the barrier function of TJs. By contrast, PKA-mediated phosphorylation of claudin-16 increases Mg2+ transport [30]. Other proteins such as mutant WNK lysine-deficient protein kinase 4 (WNK4) also increase paracellular permeability by phosphorylating claudins [31].

The expression pattern of claudins varies among tissue types, and most tissues or cell types express multiple claudins [32,33]. Such multiple combinations of claudin expression contribute to the formation of TJs through their homotypic or heterotypic interactions, or their interaction with other TJ proteins [32]. Claudins play a crucial role in the regulation of the selectivity of paracellular permeability, with claudin-2 and claudin-15 known to function in cation channels/pores, whereas claudin-4, -7 and -10a contribute to the function of anion channels/pores [22]. Claudin overexpression in several cell lines affects transepithelial resistance (TER) and the permeability to different ions in a claudin-specific manner. Claudin-1, -4, -5 and -7 increase TER, whereas claudin-2 and claudin-10 decrease TER in cultured epithelial cells [22]. Moreover, claudin-4 overexpression alters Na+ permeability without significant effect on Cl permeability in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells [34].

Mutations in claudin genes have been linked to several human diseases. Sclerosing cholangitis and ichthyosis are associated with CLDN1 mutation, and hypomagnesemia and hypercalcinuria have been linked to mutations in CLDN16 and CLDN19 [22]. Claudin-3 and claudin-4 are receptors for the Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE), while claudin-1, -6 and -9 are co-receptors for the hepatitis C virus (HCV).

4. Dysregulation of Claudins in Human Cancer

4.1. Claudin Expression in Human Cancers

Altered expression of several claudin proteins, in particular claudin-1, -3, -4 and -7, has been detected in various cancers (Table 2) [1,3]. Consistent with the disruption of TJs during tumorigenesis [1], certain claudins including claudin-1 and claudin-7 are downregulated in invasive breast, prostate, and esophageal cancers (Table 2). On the other hand, the upregulation of claudins, particularly claudin-3 and claudin-4, has also been associated with tumorigenesis. Claudin-3 and claudin-4 are highly overexpressed in ovarian cancer including serous carcinoma compared to normal ovarian tissues, and their expression is also upregulated in several other malignancies, including breast, gastric, pancreatic, prostate and uterine cancers (Table 2). It is important to note that the upregulation of claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression in ovarian cancer is based on the hypothesis that ovarian cancer arises from normal ovarian surface epithelium. However, recent studies have shown that most ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas originate from the fallopian tube rather than the ovarian surface epithelium [3538]. In this context, the expression of claudins in serous ovarian carcinoma should be compared to that in the fallopian tube.

Recent studies on claudins in breast cancer showed that claudin expression may be distinct within specific subtypes of breast cancer, such as claudin-4, whose expression is downregulated compared to normal mammary epithelial cells in grade 1 ductal carcinoma of the breast [39], whereas it is significantly upregulated in basal-like breast cancer [40]. The expression of claudin-1, -3 and -4 is higher in the intestinal type of gastric adenocarcinoma than in the diffuse type of gastric cancer [41]. A recent comprehensive analysis of the expression of claudins-1, -3, -4, -7 and -8 in high-grade invasive breast cancer, including several molecular subtypes, demonstrated the differential expression of claudins according to molecular subtype, showing increased claudin-7 and -8 in luminal tumors (estrogen positive) and increased claudin-1 and-4 in basal-like tumors [13].

4.2. Regulation of Claudin Expression in Human Cancers

The expression of claudins can be regulated by multiple mechanisms [3]. First, claudin expression can be regulated at the transcriptional level by transcription factors. Snail, a transcriptional repressor that plays a crucial role in EMT, represses the gene expression of claudins-1, -3, -4 and 7 and E-cadherin in mouse epithelial cells by directly binding to their promoter regions [70]. In human cell lines, the transcription factors Slug and Snail bind to the E-box in the promoter of human claudin-1, inhibiting its expression [71]. This study also showed the inverse correlation between the low expression level of claudin-1 and the high expression of these two transcription factors in human invasive breast cancer. Conversely, transcription factor RUNX3, which is a gastric tumor suppressor, upregulates claudin-1 expression by binding to the promoter region of CLDN1 in gastric epithelial cells [72]. In colon cancer cells, caudal homeobox proteins (Cdx1 & Cdx2) and GATA4 in cooperation with the Wnt pathway are involved in claudin-1 promoter activation [73].

Recent studies have shown the importance of epigenetic mechanism in the transcriptional regulation of CLDN expression. DNA hypermethylation is associated with the downregulation of CLDN11 in gastric cancer cells [53] and CLDN7 in breast cancer cells [45]. The association between promoter DNA hypermethylation and low expression of claudin-1 was also reported in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [74]. By contrast, claudin-4 overexpression in ovarian cancer is associated with DNA hypomethylation, whereas gene amplification is not related to claudin-4 expression [75]. In addition to DNA methylation, our group reported that loss of repressive histone methylations, including H3K27me3 and H4K20me3, is also associated with the overexpression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer [6] and claudin-4 in gastric cancer [7]. Our study in ovarian cancer [6] suggested that epigenetic derepression in addition to the well-known epigenetic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes may be a possible mechanism underlying the activation of cancer-associated genes. Another recently reported epigenetic mechanism is the regulation of CLDN expression by miRNAs. For example, claudin-1 mRNA and protein expression is downregulated by miR-155 in ovarian CSC/TICs [16].

Studies have shown that transcription factors and epigenetic modifications cooperate in the transcriptional regulation of claudin levels. The Sp1 transcription factor is crucial for CLDN3 and CLDN4 promoter activity, and the epigenetic status, including DNA methylation and histone H3 acetylation, in the critical region containing the Sp1 binding site also plays a role in the regulation of CLDN3 and CLDN4 expression in ovarian cancer cells [4,5]. DNA hypomethylation and the transcription factor CREB are related to the transcriptional upregulation of CLDN18 splice variant 2 [76]. Claudin-18 mRNA and protein levels are upregulated by treatment with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate (TPA), a PKC activator, and this upregulation is further enhanced by treatment with DNA demethylating agents in human pancreatic cancer cells [77].

Claudin expression may also be regulated at the post-transcriptional level. Claudin-1 expression was shown to be regulated through the modulation of mRNA stability in colon cancer cells [78], and further analysis by the same group showed that histone deacetylase (HDAC)-dependent regulation of claudin-1 mRNA stability is mediated by the binding of Hu antigen R and Tristetraprolin to the 3′ UTR of claudin-1 mRNA [79]. On the other hand, claudin-1 expression is increased by PKC in melanoma cells and increased claudin-1 levels contribute to melanoma cell invasion and motility [55]. Claudin-7 expression is negatively regulated by Wnt/Tcf signaling via Sox-7 in colorectal cancer cells [80]. Claudin-4 expression is downregulated by TGF-β, whereas Ras signaling positively regulates claudin-4 expression in pancreatic cancer cells [81]. Furthermore, growth factors, such as the epidermal growth factor, can regulate claudin expression along with TER [82]. Moreover, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as aspirin significantly decrease claudin-7 expression in association with p38 MAPK activation in gastric epithelial cancer cells [83].

5. Role of Claudins in Human Cancer

5.1. Claudins in Tumor Progression

The altered expression of claudins in various cancers plays different roles in a tissue-specific manner (Table 3). Epithelial tumor cells lose TJ function, leading to the loss of cell polarity and impairment of epithelial integrity during tumorigenesis [1,84]. Accordingly, loss of claudin expression was assumed to contribute to tumor progression in association with the loss of cell adhesion [1,3]. However, a number of studies have shown that increased expression of claudins may promote tumor progression through its positive effect on cell migration, invasion and metastasis (Table 3). In addition to such aberrant expression, the mislocalization of claudin proteins may contribute to their role in tumorigenesis. For example, delocalization of claudin-1 and claudin-4 from TJs in bladder tumors [85] and the effects of altered localization of claudin-7 on the invasiveness of esophageal carcinoma [84] have been reported. Additionally, the function of claudins is regulated by post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of serine and/or threonine sites in the carboxyl-terminal domains of claudins by PKA or PKC can influence their role in cancer cells, as in ovarian cancer cells, where it increases paracellular permeability [86,87]. Several signaling pathways are involved in the roles of claudins in tumorigenesis [3]. The detailed function of some claudins reporting their significant roles in various cancers will be described in the next sections.

5.1.1. Claudin-1

Claudin-1 is one of the most dysregulated claudins in human cancers, and its crucial role in various cancers has been described (Table 3). Claudin-1 can function as a cancer-promoting and tumor suppressor factor depending on cancer type.

The cancer-promoting role of claudin-1 via its effect on invasion or motility of cancer cells has been described in various cancers. Claudin-1 significantly increases xenograft tumor growth and metastatic behavior in athymic mice through its effects on E-cadherin expression and β-catenin/Tcf signaling in colon carcinoma [48]. This study also showed that claudin-1 expression increases in colon cancer, in particular in metastastic tissues with mislocalization from the cell membrane to the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. Claudin-1 overexpressing colon cancer cells formed more colonies in soft agar than did control cells and increased the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). In contrast, inhibition of claudin-1 expression significantly decreased the anchorage-independent growth and invasion of metastatic colon cancer cells with a significant decrease in MMP-9 activity. In oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, claudin-1 promotes invasion by upregulating the activity of MMP [92]. Similarly, claudin-1 expression induces MMP-2 activation, resulting in increased cell invasion and motility in melanoma cells [55]. In this study, claudin-1 expression was increased at the mRNA and protein levels by PKC activation, while the inhibition of PKC signaling decreased claudin-1 expression. In human liver cells, claudin-1 promotes invasive behavior by activating the c-Abl-PKC signaling pathway [90]. Recently, Suh et al. [91] in the same group further revealed that the induction of EMT by claudin-1 requires the activation of the c-Abl-Ras-Raf-1/ERK1/2 signaling pathway in human liver cells, supporting the importance of c-Abl signaling in the claudin-1-induced acquisition of a malignant phenotype. Claudin-1 knockdown in basal-like breast cancer cells decreases cell migration by affecting the expression of genes involved in EMT [88].

On the other hand, claudin-1 has an anti-apoptotic effect in tamoxifen-treated human breast cancer MCF-7 cells [89].

Conversely, the tumor suppressive activity of claudin-1 was reported in gastric cancer [72] and lung cancer [93]. Knockdown of claudin-1 in gastric cancer cells increases in vivo tumorigenicity [72], and claudin-1 overexpression suppresses metastasis as well as cell migration and invasion of lung cancer cells [93].

5.1.2. Claudin-3 and Claudin-4

Because of the frequent dysregulation of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer cells, the role of these claudins has mainly been reported in ovarian cancer (Table 3). In particular, overexpression of claudin-3 or claudin-4 in ovarian cancer is based on the hypothesis that ovarian cancers originate from normal ovarian surface epithelial cells, which do not express claudin-3 or claudin-4. Therefore, the overexpression of claudin-3 or claudin-4 has been shown to promote the progression of ovarian cancer. Forced expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian epithelial cells increases invasive behavior by inducing the activation of MMP [94]. CLDN3 small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in mouse and human ovarian tumor xenografts, further supporting the cancer-promoting role of claudin-3 [95]. Claudin-4 promotes the production of factors that stimulate angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting its pro-angiogenic role in ovarian cancer [97]. A recent study showed that claudin-4 promotes the motility of breast or ovarian cancer cells through interactions of its second extracellular loop with extracellular matrix proteins [104].

However, the opposite function of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer was recently reported by Shang et al. [64]. In this study, knockdown of claudin-3 and claudin-4 enhanced in vivo tumor growth and lung metastasis, whereas a significant growth increase was not observed in vitro. TJ formation and cell adhesion is impaired in claudin-3 and claudin-4 knockdown ovarian cancer cells. Loss of claudin-3 or claudin-4 expression increases in vitro cell migration and invasion in line with their effect on enhancing metastasis in vivo. Moreover, this phenomenon is associated with downregulation of E-cadherin and activation of β-catenin signaling. Based on these results, this study concluded that both claudin-3 and claudin-4 inhibit tumor growth and metastatic potential in vivo through the maintenance of E-cadherin expression and suppression of β-catenin signaling, suggesting a tumor suppressive role for claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer. This study also examined the expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in the distal fallopian tube and in tumors from the same patients in six cases of serous ovarian cancer, and high expression of these claudins in both sites was observed in all six patients, suggesting that claudin-3 and claudin-4 are normally expressed in the fallopian tube, and downregulation of claudin-3 or claudin-4 in ovarian cancer promotes tumor growth and metastatic behavior in vivo.

This relationship was further reinforced by results from the same group. Lin et al. investigated the effect of the knockdown of these proteins on the expression of EMT markers and showed that inhibition of claudin-3 and claudin-4 promotes EMT in ovarian cancer cells through the downregulation of E-cadherin, upregulation of Twist, and activation of the PI3K pathway [96]. These results are consistent with an increasing body of evidence suggesting that high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas arise from the distal fallopian tubes rather than the ovarian surface epithelium [3638]. In contrast to the roles of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer cells, claudin-1 promotes EMT in human liver cells, supporting the notion that the role of claudins in EMT is tissue-specific [67].

In light of these two recent studies, it may be postulated that ovarian cancers lacking the expression of these claudins show a more aggressive and metastatic behavior, which contradicts the previously accepted concept that claudin-3 or claudin-4 overexpression in ovarian carcinoma is related to a more malignant phenotype of ovarian cancer. However, these recent studies indicating the tumor suppressive role of claudin-3 or -4 in ovarian cancer cells are based on results obtained in only one or two cell lines. Furthermore, these findings are in conflict with the association of high claudin-3 expression with poor prognosis of ovarian cancer patients, including the shorter survival of patients previously reported by our group [105]. Therefore, further comprehensive studies are necessary to elucidate the exact role of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in ovarian cancer.

The association between the loss of claudin-3 and claudin-4 and the degree of malignancy of ovarian cancer is in line with the known disruption of TJ function during tumorigenesis, and may explain the relationship between the claudin-low subtype with low expression of claudin-3, -4 and -7 and E-cadherin and the aggressive phenotype of breast cancer [11,12].

Similarly, the tumor suppressive role of claudin-4 has been described in various cancers. Claudin-4 expression suppresses cell invasion and metastasis in pancreatic cancer [81]. Our group also showed that claudin-4 overexpression inhibits the migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells without affecting cell growth [7]. Evidences showing that low claudin-4 expression is linked to poor prognosis of patients with breast [106], esophageal [107], colon [108,109] and pancreatic cancers [110] suggest that claudin-4 expression is likely to play a tumor suppressive role in several cancers, although its role in ovarian cancer remains unclear.

The function of claudin-3 or claudin-4 is regulated by phosphorylation via kinases as well as by forced or knockdown expression. For example, phosphorylation of claudin-3 and claudin-4 by PKA [86] or PKC [87] increases paracellular permeability in ovarian cancer cells via mislocalization of claudins. As in ovarian cancer cells, PKCα activation results in the mislocalization of claudin-4 along with decreased tight junction barrier integrity in human pancreatic cancer cells [111].

5.1.3. Claudin-6

Despite several reports describing claudin-6 expression in multiple human cancers such as rhabdoid tumors [112], breast cancer [113] and gastric cancer [114], the function of claudin-6 in cancer cells has not been analyzed in detail. One study showed that decreased expression of claudin-6 enhances anchorage-independent growth and promotes cellular invasiveness of breast cancer cells [99]. In another study [100], claudin-6 expression was associated with decreased anchorage-independent growth, invasion, and increased TER in breast carcinoma cells, suggesting a possible tumor suppressive role for claudin-6 in breast cancer. On the other hand, claudin-6 overexpression in the human gastric cancer cell line AGS increases its invasion, migration, and proliferation potentials [98].

A recent study suggested a novel role for claudin-6 as a receptor for CPE by showing that the CPE sensitivity of an ovarian cancer cell line that does not express claudin-3 and claudin-4 is decreased in response to claudin-6 knockdown, while ovarian cell lines resistant to the effects of CPE can be made sensitive through claudin-6 overexpression [115]. However, further studies are required to support the role of claudin-6 as CPE receptor.

5.1.4. Claudin-7

Claudin-7 is another claudin that is frequently dysregulated in cancer, and several studies have reported its role in cancer. Knockdown of claudin-7 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells induces loss of E-cadherin, along with increased cell growth and enhanced cell invasion [84]. Similarly, claudin-7 inhibits the migration and invasion of lung cancer cells through a mechanism involving the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway [102].

By contrast, studies have shown that claudin-7 may promote tumor progression. Claudin-7 overexpression in colorectal cancer cells disrupts cell polarization, enhances β-catenin/Tcf activity and cell proliferation, and thereby promotes tumor formation in vivo in xenograft mice injected with claudin-7 overexpressing colorectal cancer cells [80]. The EpCAM-claudin-7 complex rather than EpCAM itself was reported to promote in vivo tumor growth [116]. The migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells is also enhanced by claudin-7 overexpression [101].

5.1.5. Claudin-11

Claudin-11, also known as oligodendrocyte-specific protein (OSP), is a major component of central nervous system myelin and was shown to be highly regulated during development, suggesting its role in the growth and differentiation of oligodendrocytes [117]. However, its function in cancer is not well understood. The function of claudin-11 in cancer cells has been mostly associated with its tumor suppressor function. Reduced CLDN11 expression is associated with increased invasiveness of gastric cancer cells [53]. Claudin-11 decreases the invasiveness of bladder cancer cells [103], and knockdown of claudin-11 in glioma stem cells promotes cell proliferation, supporting its tumor suppressor function [118].

5.2. Claudins in Cancer Stem Cells or Tumor-Initiating Cells

The recently reported involvement of CSC/TICs in tumor recurrence and drug resistance has generated much interest in elucidating the molecular mechanism regulating these cell populations [8]. Moreover, the EMT process has been involved in the generation of CSC/TICs [9]. Previous studies have shown that claudins are involved in the EMT process [91,96], and recent studies showing the enrichment of stem-like and EMT features in the claudin-low subtype of breast cancer provided new insight into the role of claudins in CSC/TICs [11,12].

The claudin-low subtype is a recently identified molecular subtype of human breast cancer characterized by low expression of tight junction and adherens genes including CLDN3, CLDN4, CLDN7 and CDH1 [10]. Most claudin-low tumors are triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) which lack the expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and they were found to be distinct from basal-like tumors [12]. However, it is possible that mesenchymal features of claudin-low tumors are derived from tumor-associated fibroblast or stromal contamination, not from tumor cells, and therefore further evaluation of this subtype is needed to rule out this possibility. Although this molecular subtype is not fully characterized at present and there are controversies surrounding the concept or presence of this subtype, a growing body of studies has suggested the molecular or clinical significance of the claudin-low subtype of breast cancer, as described in the following sections.

First, Hennessy et al. [11] compared the transcriptional profiling of metaplastic breast cancers (MBCs), which are an aggressive and chemoresistant subgroup of TNBCs, with other common breast cancer subtypes including luminal, HER2-enriched and basal-like cancers and identified that MBCs are the most related to the recently identified claudin-low breast tumors. This study also showed that MBCs and claudin-low subtype breast tumors have high levels of stem cell and EMT markers, and that the transcriptional features of these subtypes are enriched in CD44+/CD24−/low breast CSC/TICs. Another study by Creighton et al. [17] showed that the CD44+/CD24−/low-mammosphere (MS) signature is primarily found in the claudin-low molecular subtype. Moreover, an increase in CD44+/CD24−/low-MS and claudin-low signatures was observed in post-treatment samples after chemo or hormone therapy, indicating that remaining breast tumors after conventional treatment are likely to be enriched in cell subpopulations with CSC/TIC features. Prat et al. [12] comprehensively analyzed the clinical and molecular characteristics of the claudin-low subtype of breast cancer in comparison to those of the other subtypes and showed that claudin-low breast tumors are correlated with poor prognosis and enriched in mesenchymal and mammary stem cell-like features. More recent study by Lehmann et al., [119] identified six TNBC subtypes by analyzing the gene expression profiles of 587 TNBC cases. Among the six subtypes of TNBC, the mesenchymal stem-like (MSL) subtype was found to display low expression of claudin-3, -4, and-7, consistent with claudin-low tumors, indicating that this subtype is in part composed of the claudin-low tumors. Collectively, these results may support the high association between low claudin expression and the features of mammary CSC/TICs.

Several recent studies showed the generation of breast CSC/TICs with claudin-low phenotypes. Asiedu et al. [120] indicated that cells with breast CSC/TIC phenotypes can be generated through TGF-β/TNF-α-mediated EMT in mouse mammary carcinoma cells. These cells showed enhanced in vitro self-renewal capacity and in vivo tumorigenicity as well as increased resistance to drug treatments consistent with the phenotype of CSC/TICs. Furthermore, this study revealed that TGF-β/TNF-α-derived breast CSCs/TICs show downregulated expression of genes encoding claudins-3, -4 and -7, luminal markers and cytokeratin 18, confirming the generation of claudin-low breast CSC/TICs through EMT. More recent studies confirmed that TGF-β can increase the number of CSC/TICs in breast cancer cell lines [121] and showed that EMT-inducing transcription factors in cooperation with active RAS are sufficient to drive the transformation of human mammalian epithelial cells into malignant cells with the features of claudin-low tumors in transgenic mice [122]. However, it is not yet demonstrated whether loss of claudin expression has a causative role in the generation of breast CSC/TICs via EMT or claudin-low subtype of breast cancer is just a secondary consequence of disruption of cell-cell junctions and loss of cell polarity during EMT independent of its effects on CSC/TICs. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role or functional significance of claudins in breast CSC/TICs.

The potential role of claudins in the regulation of CSC/TICs has also been reported in other cancers. First, knockdown of claudin-4 expression in ovarian cancer cells delayed spheroid formation, suggesting the involvement of claudin-4 in the regulation of spheroid formation [123]. In addition, microarray analysis comparing gene expression between CD133+CD117+ primary ovarian sphere cells and differentiated cells identified claudin-1 as one of the genes significantly upregulated in ovarian CSC/TICs, suggesting the possible role of claudin-1 in ovarian CSC/TICs [15]. Based on these findings, the same group showed that miR-155 downregulates claudin-1 expression at the mRNA and protein levels by targeting its mRNA in ovarian CSC/TICs [16]. This study also showed that miR-155 overexpression significantly suppresses the proliferation and invasion of ovarian CSC/TICs in vitro and the growth of ovarian CSC/TIC xenograft tumors in vivo. These results indicate that miR-155 suppresses the proliferation of ovarian CSC/TICs by downregulating claudin-1 expression and provide further evidence supporting the role of claudin-1 in ovarian CSC/TICs. Independent of its effect on CSC/TICs, overexpressed miR-155 in colorectal cancer cells promotes the migration and invasion of cells through the upregulation of claudin-1 expression [124].

Unlike other claudins, claudin-6 is expressed at higher levels in undifferentiated mouse stem cells than in non-stem cells [125] and plays an important role in the development of the mouse embryonic epithelium [126]. Claudin-6 is also highly expressed in human undifferentiated cells and is necessary for human pluripotent stem cell survival and self-renewal [127]. These findings support the crucial role of claudin-6 in the function of human pluripotent stem cells and suggest its value as a stem cell-specific marker and as a target for the elimination of undifferentiated cells from mixed cell populations. Given its role in the function of pluripotent stem cells, claudin-6 is likely to play a role in CSC/TICs. Therefore, further studies investigating the involvement of claudin-6 in CSC/TICs are necessary to understand its role in their regulation.

Claudin-11 significantly inhibits the growth of glioma stem-like cells [118], and the expression of claudin-11 is regulated by miR-1275, indicating the importance of epigenetic mechanism in the regulation of glioma stem-like cells.

The relevance of claudins in CSC/TICs is beginning to emerge, and further investigation aimed at elucidating their function in CSC/TICs may support the notion that claudins are promising targets for the regulation of CSC/TICs in the treatment of recurrent cancers.

5.3. Claudins in Chemoresistance

Resistance to chemotherapy is the main cause of treatment failure in many cancers [128]. Thus, identifying cancer chemoresistance-associated genes or pathways is critical for the successful treatment of cancer.

As the development of effective therapies against chemoresistant tumors is a high priority in ovarian cancer, several studies have focused on the identification of chemoresistance-associated genes or pathways. To identify proteins associated with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer, Stewart et al. [129] compared the expression of 1117 proteins between cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant ovarian cancer cells using quantitative proteomics technology and identified 121 proteins differentially expressed between the two cell lines. Of note, claudin-4 was overexpressed by 7.2-fold in cisplatin-resistant cells and was one of the most overexpressed proteins, suggesting its possible association with cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer.

Consistent with this study, several lines of evidence support the association of high claudin-4 expression with chemoresistance of ovarian cancer. A recent study by a Japanese group [130] reported that ovarian cancer tissues from platinum-resistant patients have higher levels of claudin-4 expression than those from chemosensitive patients, and suppression of claudin-4 increased the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin. Furthermore, higher claudin-4 gene expression was also observed in chemoresistant CD44+ ovarian CSC/TICs [131].

Another study showed that the expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4, which are CPE receptors, is significantly higher in chemotherapy-resistant/recurrent ovarian tumors than in chemotherapy-naive ovarian cancers, and that targeting these proteins by CPE-mediated therapy may be effective in killing chemoresistant/recurrent ovarian tumors in vitro and in vivo [132].

In addition to claudin-3 and claudin-4, claudin-7 expression is also involved in the response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Kim et al. [133] reported that high claudin-7 protein expression is significantly associated with shorter progression-free survival and poor sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer patients. In line with these clinical observations, claudin-7 knockdown was shown to increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin treatment in this study. These findings were supported by a report showing that EpCAM-associated claudin-7 promotes drug resistance in a rat pancreatic cancer cell line [134].

Taken together, these results indicated that the expression of claudins, including claudin-3, -4 and -7, is higher in chemoresistant than in chemosensitive ovarian cancer cells and that their high expression is associated with increased resistance to chemotherapy in ovarian cancer, highlighting the fact that targeting these claudins using CPE or siRNA may increase the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to chemotherapy.

However, the opposite results on the association of these claudins with chemoresistance have been recently reported by a growing number of studies. Shang et al. [18] showed that knockdown of claudin-3 or claudin-4 increases the resistance to cisplatin in ovarian cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, these authors investigated the molecular mechanism by which claudin-3 or claudin-4 affect cisplatin sensitivity by assessing the changes in the expression of Cu transporters and chaperones based on previous studies showing their role in the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin. The results showed that the effect of claudin-3 or claudin-4 on the sensitivity of ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin is mediated in part by the regulation of the expression of the copper and cisplatin influx transporter CTR1. CTR1 gene expression was reduced in CLDN3 or CLDN4 knockdown cells, and enforced CTR1 expression restored their sensitivity to cisplatin, indicating that CTR1 plays a role in cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells.

Similarly, a recent study on human lung cancer cells showed that claudin-7 increases chemosensitivity to cisplatin by activating caspase pathways [135], which is in contrast to the study by Kim et al. [133] that showed an association between high claudin-7 expression and poor sensitivity to platinum-based chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. In this study, claudin-7-transfected cells showed a remarkable increase in the rate of cell apoptosis and significantly decreased cell viability. Cisplatin treatment increased the levels of cleaved caspases and PARP in claudin-7-transfected cells compared to non-transfected cells, indicating that increased chemosensitivity in claudin-7-expressed cells is related to the caspase pathway.

Emerging evidence on the association of CSC/TICs with chemoresistance suggests that the reduced levels of claudin-3, -4, or -7 expression in ovarian cancer cells is related to increased resistance to chemotherapy based on recent studies showing that reduced claudin-3 or claudin-4 promote EMT in ovarian cancer cells [96]. The association of low claudin expression with resistance to chemotherapy is supported by a recent study showing that subpopulations of CD44+/CD24−/low breast cancer cells with high CSC/TIC potential and a claudin-low subtype are enriched in residual tumors after conventional chemotherapy, which is in line with the expectation of survival of CSC/TICs after treatment [17] and indicates that the claudin-low subtype of breast cancer is associated with increased resistance to chemotherapy.

In addition to the aforementioned claudins, including claudin-3, -4 and -7, accumulating evidences support the link between reduced claudins and increased resistance to chemotherapy of cancer cells. To identify specific signaling pathways associated with platinum resistance in ovarian cancer, Li et al. [136] performed an integrated analysis of global DNA methylation and gene expression in cisplatin-sensitive or -resistant ovarian cancer cells. A series of drug-resistant ovarian cancer cells were established by successive cisplatin treatments in the drug-sensitive A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. Promoter DNA methylation analyses showed an increase in the number of hypermethylated CpG islands and GI50 values (i.e., dose necessary for 50% growth inhibition) with successive cisplatin treatment cycles, indicating the positive correlation between DNA methylation and the development of cisplatin resistance. Furthermore, pathway enrichment analysis identified several key biological pathways repressed by DNA hypermethylation or activated by DNA hypomethylation, and CLDN11 was identified as one of the genes involved in pathways repressed by DNA hypermethylation during the development of cisplatin resistance.

Consistent with these results, reduced claudin-1 expression was associated with increased chemoresistance of epithelial cancer cells [137] in a study in which stable knockdown of keratin 8 and 18 increased cisplatin-induced apoptosis through claudin-1 upregulation, suggesting that increased claudin-1 expression may increase cisplatin sensitivity [137].

Taken together, these studies indicate that claudins contribute to drug resistance in cancer cells via their effects on drug transporters, apoptosis or CSC/TICs, although the exact underlying mechanism is not well understood. In addition, the differences in the relationship between claudins and chemoresistance according to cancer type and the reason behind the reported opposite results on the function of the same claudin remain unclear. Thus, further comprehensive studies are required to shed light on the relevance and role of claudins in chemoresistance.

In summary, the recent emerging roles of claudins in EMT, CSC/TICs and chemoresistance suggest the existence of a link between claudins, EMT, CSC/TICs and chemoresistance (Figure 1).

6. Claudins as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets

6.1. Prognostic Significance of Claudins in Cancer

The highly specific claudin expression patterns in human cancer tissues suggest that claudins may be useful biomarkers for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancers. Among claudin proteins, claudin-3 and claudin-4 have been shown to be highly upregulated in ovarian carcinoma compared to normal ovarian surface epithelium in several studies [57,58,61,62]. Because of their consistent overexpression in ovarian cancer, claudin-3 and claudin-4 have been suggested as potentially useful biomarkers for the detection and diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Recently, claudin-4 was detected in the peripheral circulation of ovarian cancer patients, further supporting its usefulness as a biomarker [138].

Claudin expression has also been reported as a prognostic indicator as dysregulated claudin expression is associated with the prognosis of cancer patients (Table 4).

Low expression of claudin-1 is associated with poor patient prognosis in several cancers, including stage II colon cancer [139] and prostate cancer [65], and it is an independent predictor of tumor recurrence in both cancer types. Decreased claudin-1 expression is an indicator of the degree of malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma as suggested by its correlation with dedifferentiation and portal invasion [54]. Similarly, decreased claudin-1 expression is positively correlated with the frequency of recurrence and shorter disease-free intervals in breast cancer [140]. Claudin-1 expression is upregulated in association with older age in women with basal-like breast cancer, suggesting the potential value of claudin-1 for the identification of specific groups of patients with basal-like breast cancer [88].

Similarly, the downregulation of claudin-2 protein expression is significantly associated with a high clinical stage of patients with breast cancer [43].

By contrast, ovarian serous adenocarcinoma patients with high claudin-3 expression show a significantly shorter survival than those with low claudin-3 expression, while claudin-4 expression is not associated with patient survival in this cancer [105]. Therefore, claudin-3 overexpression is an independent negative prognostic factor in ovarian serous carcinoma. Claudin-3 and claudin-4 overexpression in this study was determined by their non-detectable expression in normal ovarian surface epithelium based on the notion that ovarian cancer originates in the normal ovarian surface epithelium [105].

A study investigating the clinical significance of claudin-4 in breast cancer showed that high claudin-4 expression is associated with significantly shorter overall survival and recurrence-free survival, suggesting a relationship between high claudin-4 expression and poor outcomes of patients with breast cancer [142]. However, recent studies have shown that the distinct prognostic significance of claudin-3 or claudin-4 is dependent on the subtype of breast cancer. For instance, a Japanese group showed that the combination of claudin-4 and E-cadherin expression called CURIO accurately predicts relapse-free survival in breast cancer [106]. CURIO was shown to predict prognosis, especially in luminal A and triple-negative subtypes of breast cancer: high expression of CURIO is related to worse prognosis and low expression is associated with a better outcome. The distinctive prognostic significance of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in triple-negative and luminal types of breast cancer was analyzed in a recent report [141] in which positive expression of claudin-3 was associated with poor prognostic factors, whereas claudin-4 expression was related to better prognostic factors in TNBCs. Conversely, positive claudin-4 expression was associated with shorter disease-free survival and claudin-3 was related to longer disease-free survival in luminal types of breast cancer.

The relationship of claudin-4 expression with patient prognosis in gastric cancer is also controversial. One study [41] showed that strong claudin-4 expression is more frequently associated with the intestinal type than the diffuse type of gastric cancer, and high claudin-4 expression is significantly associated with shorter survival, while another study [147] showed that overall survival is decreased in patients with low claudin-4 expression. Our group recently reported that high membranous claudin-4 expression is related to better prognosis, while cytoplasmic claudin-4 expression has no significant relationship with patient prognosis [7]. Importantly, this study demonstrated that high membranous claudin-4 expression is an independent positive prognostic factor in gastric carcinoma.

Low expression of claudin-4 is related to poor prognosis in esophageal cancer [107], colon cancer [108], colorectal cancer [109], and pancreatic carcinoma [110].

Reduced expression of claudin-7 is associated with poor patient outcome in several cancers. Comparison of the expression of claudin-7 at the invasive front of the esophageal cancer with that in the corresponding metastastic lymph nodes showed significantly reduced claudin-7 expression in metastastic lymph nodes, indicating that claudin-7 may be a predictor of lymph node metastasis [50]. Loss of claudin-7 expression is significantly correlated with high histological grade of breast carcinoma, including ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma [45]. A recent study further supported the poor prognostic significance of claudin-7 expression in ductal invasive breast cancer by showing that claudin-7 expression is associated with a shorter time to recurrence [143]. In non-small cell lung cancer, survival is significantly poorer in patients with low claudin-7 expression than in those with high claudin-7 expression [144]. Decreased claudin-7 expression is also correlated with unfavorable prognostic factors, including invasion and lymph node metastasis, whereas patients with positive claudin-7 expression show a significantly favorable prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma [145].

The combined expression of several claudins can predict disease recurrence, as shown in a recent study by Lu et al. [13] in which the relationship between the expression of claudins -1, -3, -4, -7 and -8 and patient survival was analyzed in high-grade invasive breast cancer including several molecular subtypes. In this study, low expression of all five claudins was mostly detected in basal-like cancers (77%), and patients with claudin-low tumors had significantly shorter recurrence-free survival, suggesting that low levels of claudin expression predict disease recurrence.

An association between claudin-10 gene expression and disease recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma was suggested by the finding that patients with high expression of claudin-10 had shorter disease-free survival [146]. Multivariate analysis confirmed that claudin-10 gene expression is an independent predictor in recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma.

6.2. Claudins as Drug Targets in Cancer

Claudins have four transmembrane domains and two extracellular loops, and they are promising targets for antibody-based therapies. However, their hydrophobicity and low immunogenicity has made it difficult to raise antibodies targeting claudins. Antibodies that specifically recognize the extracellular loops of human claudin-3 [148] or claudin-4 [149] have been successfully produced, and the anti-claudin-4 antibody has shown therapeutic antitumor activity in vitro and in vivo [149]. Furthermore, a dual-targeting monoclonal antibody against claudin-3 and claudin-4 was recently prepared and shown to possess antitumor effects in vitro and in vivo [150], supporting the potential role of claudins as targets for therapeutic antibodies. This antibody successfully induced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) in vitro and inhibited tumor formation in SCID mice in vivo.

Claudin-3 and claudin-4 are receptors for CPE; therefore, the use of CPE to target claudins has been suggested. CPE treatment of ovarian cancer cells affects TJ function [75], and treatment with recombinant CPE fused to tumor necrosis factor has cytotoxic effects in ovarian cancer cells, supporting the possible development of CPE as targeted therapy for ovarian cancer [151]. Especially, CPE is effective in chemoresistant/recurrent ovarian cancer based on the high expression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 in chemoresistant/recurrent ovarian tumors [132].

On the other hand, studies have shown the therapeutic effects of siRNAs targeting claudin. CLDN3 siRNA showed potent suppression of both tumor growth and metastasis in mouse and human ovarian tumor xenografts [95].

Taken together, the results of previous studies suggest that claudin-targeted drugs and therapies for cancer treatment are likely to be clinically applicable in the near future, although proof of concept for claudin-targeted therapy is not yet fully established.

7. Conclusions

The generally accepted concept that tumorigenesis is associated with loss of function of TJs implies that claudin expression is downregulated during tumor progression. However, claudin expression can be decreased or increased in human cancer in a tissue-specific manner, and a role for claudins in tumor progression has been suggested based on their effects on the migration and invasion of cancer cells and metastasis. Furthermore, claudin expression is significantly associated with patient survival or recurrence in some cancers, suggesting that these TJ proteins could be prognostic markers and promising therapeutic targets, although their exact role in cancer remains to be elucidated.

The recent identification of a claudin-low subtype of breast carcinoma characterized by enrichment of EMT markers and stem cell-like features has suggested a potentially important role for claudins in the acquisition of a CSC/TIC phenotype through EMT. Recent studies provided further evidence supporting the EMT-induced generation of breast CSC/TICs with claudin-low expression and the relevance of the claudin-low subtype in chemoresistance. In this context, a link between claudin, EMT, CSC/TICs and chemoresistance has been suggested. A critical issue in the current treatment of cancer is the association between the development of CSC/TICs and resistance to current chemotherapy and recurrence after initial treatment. Therefore, a better understanding of the role of claudins in EMT and CSC/TICs may provide important information to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of tumor recurrence and may help in the design of therapeutic strategies for chemoresistant and recurrent cancers.


This research was supported by Kyungpook National University Research Fund, 2012.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Morin, P.J. Claudin proteins in human cancer: Promising new targets for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Res 2005, 65, 9603–9606. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lal-Nag, M.; Morin, P.J. The claudins. Genome Biol 2009, 10, 235. [Google Scholar]
  3. Singh, A.B.; Sharma, A.; Dhawan, P. Claudin family of proteins and cancer: An overview. J. Oncol 2010, 2010, 541957. [Google Scholar]
  4. Honda, H.; Pazin, M.J.; Ji, H.; Wernyj, R.P.; Morin, P.J. Crucial roles of Sp1 and epigenetic modifications in the regulation of the CLDN4 promoter in ovarian cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem 2006, 281, 21433–21444. [Google Scholar]
  5. Honda, H.; Pazin, M.J.; D’Souza, T.; Ji, H.; Morin, P.J. Regulation of the CLDN3 gene in ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Biol. Ther 2007, 6, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar]
  6. Kwon, M.J.; Kim, S.S.; Choi, Y.L.; Jung, H.S.; Balch, C.; Kim, S.H.; Song, Y.S.; Marquez, V.E.; Nephew, K.P.; Shin, Y.K. Derepression of CLDN3 and CLDN4 during ovarian tumorigenesis is associated with loss of repressive histone modifications. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 974–983. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kwon, M.J.; Kim, S.H.; Jeong, H.M.; Jung, H.S.; Kim, S.S.; Lee, J.E.; Gye, M.C.; Erkin, O.C.; Koh, S.S.; Choi, Y.L.; et al. Claudin-4 overexpression is associated with epigenetic derepression in gastric carcinoma. Lab. Invest 2011, 91, 1652–1667. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baccelli, I.; Trumpp, A. The evolving concept of cancer and metastasis stem cells. J. Cell. Biol 2012, 198, 281–293. [Google Scholar]
  9. Singh, A.; Settleman, J. EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: An emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene 2010, 29, 4741–4751. [Google Scholar]
  10. Herschkowitz, J.I.; Simin, K.; Weigman, V.J.; Mikaelian, I.; Usary, J.; Hu, Z.; Rasmussen, K.E.; Jones, L.P.; Assefnia, S.; Chandrasekharan, S. Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors. Genome Biol 2007, 8, R76. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hennessy, B.T.; Gonzalez-Angulo, A.M.; Stemke-Hale, K.; Gilcrease, M.Z.; Krishnamurthy, S.; Lee, J.S.; Fridlyand, J.; Sahin, A.; Agarwal, R.; Joy, C.; et al. Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res 2009, 69, 4116–4124. [Google Scholar]
  12. Prat, A.; Parker, J.S.; Karginova, O.; Fan, C.; Livasy, C.; Herschkowitz, J.I.; He, X.; Perou, C.M. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2010, 12, R68. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu, S.; Singh, K.; Mangray, S.; Tavares, R.; Noble, L.; Resnick, M.B.; Yakirevich, E. Claudin expression in high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: Correlation with the molecular subtype. Mod. Pathol 2013, 26, 485–495. [Google Scholar]
  14. Turksen, K. Claudins and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 2011, 7, 797–798. [Google Scholar]
  15. Liu, T.; Cheng, W.; Lai, D.; Huang, Y.; Guo, L. Characterization of primary ovarian cancer cells in different culture systems. Oncol. Rep 2010, 23, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qin, W.; Ren, Q.; Liu, T.; Huang, Y.; Wang, J. MicroRNA-155 is a novel suppressor of ovarian cancer-initiating cells that targets CLDN1. FEBS Lett 2013, 587, 1434–1439. [Google Scholar]
  17. Creighton, C.J.; Li, X.; Landis, M.; Dixon, J.M.; Neumeister, V.M.; Sjolund, A.; Rimm, D.L.; Wong, H.; Rodriguez, A.; Herschkowitz, J.I.; et al. Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13820–13825. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shang, X.; Lin, X.; Manorek, G.; Howell, S.B. Claudin-3 and claudin-4 regulate sensitivity to cisplatin by controlling expression of the copper and cisplatin influx transporter CTR1. Mol. Pharmacol 2013, 83, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shin, K.; Fogg, V.C.; Margolis, B. Tight junctions and cell polarity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol 2006, 22, 207–235. [Google Scholar]
  20. Matter, K.; Balda, M.S. Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2003, 4, 225–236. [Google Scholar]
  21. Matter, K.; Aijaz, S.; Tsapara, A.; Balda, M.S. Mammalian tight junctions in the regulation of epithelial differentiation and proliferation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol 2005, 17, 453–458. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tsukita, S.; Yamazaki, Y.; Katsuno, T.; Tamura, A. Tight junction-based epithelial microenvironment and cell proliferation. Oncogene 2008, 27, 6930–6938. [Google Scholar]
  23. Assemat, E.; Bazellieres, E.; Pallesi-Pocachard, E.; Le Bivic, A.; Massey-Harroche, D. Polarity complex proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778, 614–630. [Google Scholar]
  24. Cordenonsi, M.; Zanconato, F.; Azzolin, L.; Forcato, M.; Rosato, A.; Frasson, C.; Inui, M.; Montagner, M.; Parenti, A.R.; Poletti, A.; et al. The Hippo transducer TAZ confers cancer stem cell-related traits on breast cancer cells. Cell 2011, 147, 759–772. [Google Scholar]
  25. Matter, K.; Balda, M.S. Epithelial tight junctions, gene expression and nucleo-junctional interplay. J. Cell Sci 2007, 120, 1505–1511. [Google Scholar]
  26. Krause, G.; Winkler, L.; Mueller, S.L.; Haseloff, R.F.; Piontek, J.; Blasig, I.E. Structure and function of claudins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2008, 1778, 631–645. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fujibe, M.; Chiba, H.; Kojima, T.; Soma, T.; Wada, T.; Yamashita, T.; Sawada, N. Thr203 of claudin-1, a putative phosphorylation site for MAP kinase, is required to promote the barrier function of tight junctions. Exp. Cell Res 2004, 295, 36–47. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nunbhakdi-Craig, V.; Machleidt, T.; Ogris, E.; Bellotto, D.; White, C.L., III; Sontag, E. Protein phosphatase 2A associates with and regulates atypical PKC and the epithelial tight junction complex. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158, 967–978. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ishizaki, T.; Chiba, H.; Kojima, T.; Fujibe, M.; Soma, T.; Miyajima, H.; Nagasawa, K.; Wada, I.; Sawada, N. Cyclic AMP induces phosphorylation of claudin-5 immunoprecipitates and expression of claudin-5 gene in blood-brain-barrier endothelial cells via protein kinase A-dependent and -independent pathways. Exp. Cell Res 2003, 290, 275–288. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ikari, A.; Ito, M.; Okude, C.; Sawada, H.; Harada, H.; Degawa, M.; Sakai, H.; Takahashi, T.; Sugatani, J.; Miwa, M. Claudin-16 is directly phosphorylated by protein kinase A independently of a vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-mediated pathway. J. Cell Physiol 2008, 214, 221–229. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yamauchi, K.; Rai, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Sohara, E.; Suzuki, T.; Itoh, T.; Suda, S.; Hayama, A.; Sasaki, S.; Uchida, S. Disease-causing mutant WNK4 increases paracellular chloride permeability and phosphorylates claudins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4690–4694. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tsukita, S.; Furuse, M.; Itoh, M. Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2001, 2, 285–293. [Google Scholar]
  33. Turksen, K.; Troy, T.C. Barriers built on claudins. J. Cell Sci 2004, 117, 2435–2447. [Google Scholar]
  34. Van Itallie, C.; Rahner, C.; Anderson, J.M. Regulated expression of claudin-4 decreases paracellular conductance through a selective decrease in sodium permeability. J. Clin. Invest 2001, 107, 1319–1327. [Google Scholar]
  35. Karst, A.M.; Drapkin, R. Ovarian cancer pathogenesis: a model in evolution. J. Oncol 2010, 2010, 932371. [Google Scholar]
  36. Karst, A.M.; Levanon, K.; Drapkin, R. Modeling high-grade serous ovarian carcinogenesis from the fallopian tube. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7547–7552. [Google Scholar]
  37. Levanon, K.; Ng, V.; Piao, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chang, M.C.; Roh, M.H.; Kindelberger, D.W.; Hirsch, M.S.; Crum, C.P.; Marto, J.A.; et al. Primary ex vivo cultures of human fallopian tube epithelium as a model for serous ovarian carcinogenesis. Oncogene 2010, 29, 1103–1113. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee, Y.; Miron, A.; Drapkin, R.; Nucci, M.R.; Medeiros, F.; Saleemuddin, A.; Garber, J.; Birch, C.; Mou, H.; Gordon, R.W.; et al. A candidate precursor to serous carcinoma that originates in the distal fallopian tube. J. Pathol 2007, 211, 26–35. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tokes, A.M.; Kulka, J.; Paku, S.; Szik, A.; Paska, C.; Novak, P.K.; Szilak, L.; Kiss, A.; Bogi, K.; Schaff, Z. Claudin-1, -3 and -4 proteins and mRNA expression in benign and malignant breast lesions: a research study. Breast Cancer Res 2005, 7, R296–R305. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kulka, J.; Szasz, A.M.; Nemeth, Z.; Madaras, L.; Schaff, Z.; Molnar, I.A.; Tokes, A.M. Expression of tight junction protein claudin-4 in basal-like breast carcinomas. Pathol. Oncol. Res 2009, 15, 59–64. [Google Scholar]
  41. Resnick, M.B.; Gavilanez, M.; Newton, E.; Konkin, T.; Bhattacharya, B.; Britt, D.E.; Sabo, E.; Moss, S.F. Claudin expression in gastric adenocarcinomas: A tissue microarray study with prognostic correlation. Hum. Pathol 2005, 36, 886–892. [Google Scholar]
  42. Soini, Y. Expression of claudins 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 in various types of tumours. Histopathology 2005, 46, 551–560. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kim, T.H.; Huh, J.H.; Lee, S.; Kang, H.; Kim, G.I.; An, H.J. Down-regulation of claudin-2 in breast carcinomas is associated with advanced disease. Histopathology 2008, 53, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kominsky, S.L.; Vali, M.; Korz, D.; Gabig, T.G.; Weitzman, S.A.; Argani, P.; Sukumar, S. Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin elicits rapid and specific cytolysis of breast carcinoma cells mediated through tight junction proteins claudin 3 and 4. Am. J. Pathol 2004, 164, 1627–1633. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kominsky, S.L.; Argani, P.; Korz, D.; Evron, E.; Raman, V.; Garrett, E.; Rein, A.; Sauter, G.; Kallioniemi, O.P.; Sukumar, S. Loss of the tight junction protein claudin-7 correlates with histological grade in both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Oncogene 2003, 22, 2021–2033. [Google Scholar]
  46. Sobel, G.; Paska, C.; Szabo, I.; Kiss, A.; Kadar, A.; Schaff, Z. Increased expression of claudins in cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma. Hum. Pathol 2005, 36, 162–169. [Google Scholar]
  47. De Oliveira, S.S.; de Oliveira, I.M.; de Souza, W.; Morgado-Diaz, J.A. Claudins upregulation in human colorectal cancer. FEBS Lett 2005, 579, 6179–6185. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dhawan, P.; Singh, A.B.; Deane, N.G.; No, Y.; Shiou, S.R.; Schmidt, C.; Neff, J.; Washington, M.K.; Beauchamp, R.D. Claudin-1 regulates cellular transformation and metastatic behavior in colon cancer. J. Clin. Invest 2005, 115, 1765–1776. [Google Scholar]
  49. Montgomery, E.; Mamelak, A.J.; Gibson, M.; Maitra, A.; Sheikh, S.; Amr, S.S.; Yang, S.; Brock, M.; Forastiere, A.; Zhang, S.; et al. Overexpression of claudin proteins in esophageal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol 2006, 14, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  50. Usami, Y.; Chiba, H.; Nakayama, F.; Ueda, J.; Matsuda, Y.; Sawada, N.; Komori, T.; Ito, A.; Yokozaki, H. Reduced expression of claudin-7 correlates with invasion and metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. Hum. Pathol 2006, 37, 569–577. [Google Scholar]
  51. Cunningham, S.C.; Kamangar, F.; Kim, M.P.; Hammoud, S.; Haque, R.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C.A.; Maitra, A.; Ashfaq, R.; Hustinx, S.; Heitmiller, R.E.; et al. Claudin-4, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4, and stratifin are markers of gastric adenocarcinoma precursor lesions. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev 2006, 15, 281–287. [Google Scholar]
  52. Johnson, A.H.; Frierson, H.F.; Zaika, A.; Powell, S.M.; Roche, J.; Crowe, S.; Moskaluk, C.A.; El-Rifai, W. Expression of tight-junction protein claudin-7 is an early event in gastric tumorigenesis. Am. J. Pathol 2005, 167, 577–584. [Google Scholar]
  53. Agarwal, R.; Mori, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Jin, Z.; Olaru, A.V.; Hamilton, J.P.; David, S.; Selaru, F.M.; Yang, J.; Abraham, J.M.; et al. Silencing of claudin-11 is associated with increased invasiveness of gastric cancer cells. PLoS One 2009, 4, e8002. [Google Scholar]
  54. Higashi, Y.; Suzuki, S.; Sakaguchi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Baba, S.; Reinecker, H.C.; Nakamura, S.; Konno, H. Loss of claudin-1 expression correlates with malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Surg. Res 2007, 139, 68–76. [Google Scholar]
  55. Leotlela, P.D.; Wade, M.S.; Duray, P.H.; Rhode, M.J.; Brown, H.F.; Rosenthal, D.T.; Dissanayake, S.K.; Earley, R.; Indig, F.E.; Nickoloff, B.J.; et al. Claudin-1 overexpression in melanoma is regulated by PKC and contributes to melanoma cell motility. Oncogene 2007, 26, 3846–3856. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hough, C.D.; Sherman-Baust, C.A.; Pizer, E.S.; Montz, F.J.; Im, D.D.; Rosenshein, N.B.; Cho, K.R.; Riggins, G.J.; Morin, P.J. Large-scale serial analysis of gene expression reveals genes differentially expressed in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2000, 60, 6281–6287. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rangel, L.B.; Agarwal, R.; D’Souza, T.; Pizer, E.S.; Alo, P.L.; Lancaster, W.D.; Gregoire, L.; Schwartz, D.R.; Cho, K.R.; Morin, P.J. Tight junction proteins claudin-3 and claudin-4 are frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer but not in ovarian cystadenomas. Clin. Cancer Res 2003, 9, 2567–2575. [Google Scholar]
  58. Heinzelmann-Schwarz, V.A.; Gardiner-Garden, M.; Henshall, S.M.; Scurry, J.; Scolyer, R.A.; Davies, M.J.; Heinzelmann, M.; Kalish, L.H.; Bali, A.; Kench, J.G.; et al. Overexpression of the cell adhesion molecules DDR1, Claudin 3, and Ep-CAM in metaplastic ovarian epithelium and ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res 2004, 10, 4427–4436. [Google Scholar]
  59. Lu, K.H.; Patterson, A.P.; Wang, L.; Marquez, R.T.; Atkinson, E.N.; Baggerly, K.A.; Ramoth, L.R.; Rosen, D.G.; Liu, J.; Hellstrom, I.; et al. Selection of potential markers for epithelial ovarian cancer with gene expression arrays and recursive descent partition analysis. Clin. Cancer Res 2004, 10, 3291–3300. [Google Scholar]
  60. Santin, A.D.; Zhan, F.; Bellone, S.; Palmieri, M.; Cane, S.; Bignotti, E.; Anfossi, S.; Gokden, M.; Dunn, D.; Roman, J.J.; et al. Gene expression profiles in primary ovarian serous papillary tumors and normal ovarian epithelium: Identification of candidate molecular markers for ovarian cancer diagnosis and therapy. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 112, 14–25. [Google Scholar]
  61. Zhu, Y.; Brannstrom, M.; Janson, P.O.; Sundfeldt, K. Differences in expression patterns of the tight junction proteins,claudin 1, 3, 4 and 5, in human ovarian surface epithelium as compared to epithelia in inclusion cysts and epithelial ovarian tumours. Int. J. Cancer 2006, 118, 1884–1891. [Google Scholar]
  62. Hibbs, K.; Skubitz, K.M.; Pambuccian, S.E.; Casey, R.C.; Burleson, K.M.; Oegema, T.R., Jr; Thiele, J.J.; Grindle, S.M.; Bliss, R.L.; Skubitz, A.P. Differential gene expression in ovarian carcinoma: Identification of potential biomarkers. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 165, 397–414. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tassi, R.A.; Bignotti, E.; Falchetti, M.; Ravanini, M.; Calza, S.; Ravaggi, A.; Bandiera, E.; Facchetti, F.; Pecorelli, S.; Santin, A.D. Claudin-7 expression in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2008, 18, 1262–1271. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shang, X.; Lin, X.; Alvarez, E.; Manorek, G.; Howell, S.B. Tight junction proteins claudin-3 and claudin-4 control tumor growth and metastases. Neoplasia 2012, 14, 974–985. [Google Scholar]
  65. Sheehan, G.M.; Kallakury, B.V.; Sheehan, C.E.; Fisher, H.A.; Kaufman, R.P., Jr; Ross, J.S. Loss of claudins-1 and -7 and expression of claudins-3 and -4 correlate with prognostic variables in prostatic adenocarcinomas. Hum. Pathol. 2007, 38, 564–569. [Google Scholar]
  66. Long, H.; Crean, C.D.; Lee, W.H.; Cummings, O.W.; Gabig, T.G. Expression of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin receptors claudin-3 and claudin-4 in prostate cancer epithelium. Cancer Res 2001, 61, 7878–7881. [Google Scholar]
  67. Michl, P.; Buchholz, M.; Rolke, M.; Kunsch, S.; Lohr, M.; McClane, B.; Tsukita, S.; Leder, G.; Adler, G.; Gress, T.M. Claudin-4: A new target for pancreatic cancer treatment using Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Gastroenterology 2001, 121, 678–684. [Google Scholar]
  68. Nichols, L.S.; Ashfaq, R.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C.A. Claudin 4 protein expression in primary and metastatic pancreatic cancer: Support for use as a therapeutic target. Am. J. Clin. Pathol 2004, 121, 226–230. [Google Scholar]
  69. Santin, A.D.; Zhan, F.; Cane, S.; Bellone, S.; Palmieri, M.; Thomas, M.; Burnett, A.; Roman, J.J.; Cannon, M.J.; Shaughnessy, J., Jr; et al. Gene expression fingerprint of uterine serous papillary carcinoma: identification of novel molecular markers for uterine serous cancer diagnosis and therapy. Br. J. Cancer 2005, 92, 1561–1573. [Google Scholar]
  70. Ikenouchi, J.; Matsuda, M.; Furuse, M.; Tsukita, S. Regulation of tight junctions during the epithelium-mesenchyme transition: direct repression of the gene expression of claudins/occludin by Snail. J. Cell Sci 2003, 116, 1959–1967. [Google Scholar]
  71. Martinez-Estrada, O.M.; Culleres, A.; Soriano, F.X.; Peinado, H.; Bolos, V.; Martinez, F.O.; Reina, M.; Cano, A.; Fabre, M.; Vilaro, S. The transcription factors Slug and Snail act as repressors of Claudin-1 expression in epithelial cells. Biochem. J 2006, 394, 449–457. [Google Scholar]
  72. Chang, T.L.; Ito, K.; Ko, T.K.; Liu, Q.; Salto-Tellez, M.; Yeoh, K.G.; Fukamachi, H.; Ito, Y. Claudin-1 has tumor suppressive activity and is a direct target of RUNX3 in gastric epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 2009, 138, 255–265. [Google Scholar]
  73. Bhat, A.A.; Sharma, A.; Pope, J.; Krishnan, M.; Washington, M.K.; Singh, A.B.; Dhawan, P. Caudal homeobox protein Cdx-2 cooperates with Wnt pathway to regulate claudin-1 expression in colon cancer cells. PLoS One 2012, 7, e37174. [Google Scholar]
  74. Di Cello, F.; Cope, L.; Li, H.; Jeschke, J.; Wang, W.; Baylin, S.B.; Zahnow, C.A. Methylation of the claudin 1 promoter is associated with loss of expression in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. PLoS One 2013, 8, e68630. [Google Scholar]
  75. Litkouhi, B.; Kwong, J.; Lo, C.M.; Smedley, J.G., III; McClane, B.A.; Aponte, M.; Gao, Z.; Sarno, J.L.; Hinners, J.; Welch, W.R.; et al. Claudin-4 overexpression in epithelial ovarian cancer is associated with hypomethylation and is a potential target for modulation of tight junction barrier function using a C-terminal fragment of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Neoplasia 2007, 9, 304–314. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sahin, U.; Koslowski, M.; Dhaene, K.; Usener, D.; Brandenburg, G.; Seitz, G.; Huber, C.; Tureci, O. Claudin-18 splice variant 2 is a pan-cancer target suitable for therapeutic antibody development. Clin. Cancer Res 2008, 14, 7624–7634. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ito, T.; Kojima, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Kyuno, D.; Kimura, Y.; Imamura, M.; Takasawa, A.; Murata, M.; Tanaka, S.; Hirata, K.; et al. Transcriptional regulation of claudin-18 via specific protein kinase C signaling pathways and modification of DNA methylation in human pancreatic cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem 2011, 112, 1761–1772. [Google Scholar]
  78. Krishnan, M.; Singh, A.B.; Smith, J.J.; Sharma, A.; Chen, X.; Eschrich, S.; Yeatman, T.J.; Beauchamp, R.D.; Dhawan, P. HDAC inhibitors regulate claudin-1 expression in colon cancer cells through modulation of mRNA stability. Oncogene 2009, 29, 305–312. [Google Scholar]
  79. Sharma, A.; Bhat, A.A.; Krishnan, M.; Singh, A.B.; Dhawan, P. Trichostatin-A modulates claudin-1 mRNA stability through the modulation of Hu antigen R and tristetraprolin in colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Darido, C.; Buchert, M.; Pannequin, J.; Bastide, P.; Zalzali, H.; Mantamadiotis, T.; Bourgaux, J.F.; Garambois, V.; Jay, P.; Blache, P.; et al. Defective claudin-7 regulation by Tcf-4 and Sox-9 disrupts the polarity and increases the tumorigenicity of colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res 2008, 68, 4258–4268. [Google Scholar]
  81. Michl, P.; Barth, C.; Buchholz, M.; Lerch, M.M.; Rolke, M.; Holzmann, K.H.; Menke, A.; Fensterer, H.; Giehl, K.; Lohr, M.; et al. Claudin-4 expression decreases invasiveness and metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2003, 63, 6265–6271. [Google Scholar]
  82. Singh, A.B.; Harris, R.C. Epidermal growth factor receptor activation differentially regulates claudin expression and enhances transepithelial resistance in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 3543–3552. [Google Scholar]
  83. Oshima, T.; Miwa, H.; Joh, T. Aspirin induces gastric epithelial barrier dysfunction by activating p38 MAPK via claudin-7. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol 2008, 295, C800–C806. [Google Scholar]
  84. Lioni, M.; Brafford, P.; Andl, C.; Rustgi, A.; El-Deiry, W.; Herlyn, M.; Smalley, K.S. Dysregulation of claudin-7 leads to loss of E-cadherin expression and the increased invasion of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Am. J. Pathol 2007, 170, 709–721. [Google Scholar]
  85. Boireau, S.; Buchert, M.; Samuel, M.S.; Pannequin, J.; Ryan, J.L.; Choquet, A.; Chapuis, H.; Rebillard, X.; Avances, C.; Ernst, M.; et al. DNA-methylation-dependent alterations of claudin-4 expression in human bladder carcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 246–258. [Google Scholar]
  86. D’Souza, T.; Agarwal, R.; Morin, P.J. Phosphorylation of claudin-3 at threonine 192 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulates tight junction barrier function in ovarian cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem 2005, 280, 26233–26240. [Google Scholar]
  87. D’Souza, T.; Indig, F.E.; Morin, P.J. Phosphorylation of claudin-4 by PKCepsilon regulates tight junction barrier function in ovarian cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res 2007, 313, 3364–3375. [Google Scholar]
  88. Blanchard, A.A.; Ma, X.; Dueck, K.J.; Penner, C.; Cooper, S.C.; Mulhall, D.; Murphy, L.C.; Leygue, E.; Myal, Y. Claudin 1 expression in basal-like breast cancer is related to patient age. BMC Cancer 2013, 13, 268. [Google Scholar]
  89. Akasaka, H.; Sato, F.; Morohashi, S.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Kondo, J.; Odagiri, H.; Hakamada, K.; Kijima, H. Anti-apoptotic effect of claudin-1 in tamoxifen-treated human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 548. [Google Scholar]
  90. Yoon, C.H.; Kim, M.J.; Park, M.J.; Park, I.C.; Hwang, S.G.; An, S.; Choi, Y.H.; Yoon, G.; Lee, S.J. Claudin-1 acts through c-ABl-PKCdelta signaling and has a causal role in the acquisition of invasive capacity in human liver cells. J. Biol. Chem 2009, 285, 226–233. [Google Scholar]
  91. Suh, Y.; Yoon, C.H.; Kim, R.K.; Lim, E.J.; Oh, Y.S.; Hwang, S.G.; An, S.; Yoon, G.; Gye, M.C.; Yi, J.M.; et al. Claudin-1 induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through activation of the c-Abl-ERK signaling pathway in human liver cells. Oncogene 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Oku, N.; Sasabe, E.; Ueta, E.; Yamamoto, T.; Osaki, T. Tight junction protein claudin-1 enhances the invasive activity of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by promoting cleavage of laminin-5 gamma2 chain via matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and membrane-type MMP-1. Cancer Res 2006, 66, 5251–5257. [Google Scholar]
  93. Chao, Y.C.; Pan, S.H.; Yang, S.C.; Yu, S.L.; Che, T.F.; Lin, C.W.; Tsai, M.S.; Chang, G.C.; Wu, C.H.; Wu, Y.Y.; et al. Claudin-1 is a metastasis suppressor and correlates with clinical outcome in lung adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med 2009, 179, 123–133. [Google Scholar]
  94. Agarwal, R.; D’Souza, T.; Morin, P.J. Claudin-3 and claudin-4 expression in ovarian epithelial cells enhances invasion and is associated with increased matrix metalloproteinase-2 activity. Cancer Res 2005, 65, 7378–7385. [Google Scholar]
  95. Huang, Y.H.; Bao, Y.; Peng, W.; Goldberg, M.; Love, K.; Bumcrot, D.A.; Cole, G.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G.; Sawicki, J.A. Claudin-3 gene silencing with siRNA suppresses ovarian tumor growth and metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3426–3430. [Google Scholar]
  96. Lin, X.; Shang, X.; Manorek, G.; Howell, S.B. Regulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition by claudin-3 and claudin-4. PLoS One 2013, 8, e67496. [Google Scholar]
  97. Li, J.; Chigurupati, S.; Agarwal, R.; Mughal, M.R.; Mattson, M.P.; Becker, K.G.; Wood, W.H., III; Zhang, Y.; Morin, P.J. Possible angiogenic roles for claudin-4 in ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2009, 8, 1806–1814. [Google Scholar]
  98. Zavala-Zendejas, V.E.; Torres-Martinez, A.C.; Salas-Morales, B.; Fortoul, T.I.; Montano, L.F.; Rendon-Huerta, E.P. Claudin-6, 7, or 9 overexpression in the human gastric adenocarcinoma cell line AGS increases its invasiveness, migration, and proliferation rate. Cancer Invest 2011, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  99. Osanai, M.; Murata, M.; Chiba, H.; Kojima, T.; Sawada, N. Epigenetic silencing of claudin-6 promotes anchorage-independent growth of breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Sci 2007, 98, 1557–1562. [Google Scholar]
  100. Wu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ren, Y.; Xu, X.; Yu, L.; Li, Y.; Quan, C. Tight junction protein, claudin-6, downregulates the malignant phenotype of breast carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer Prev 2010, 19, 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  101. Dahiya, N.; Becker, K.G.; Wood, W.H., III; Zhang, Y.; Morin, P.J. Claudin-7 is frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer and promotes invasion. PLoS One 2011, 6, e22119. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lu, Z.; Ding, L.; Hong, H.; Hoggard, J.; Lu, Q.; Chen, Y.H. Claudin-7 inhibits human lung cancer cell migration and invasion through ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. Exp. Cell Res 2011, 317, 1935–1946. [Google Scholar]
  103. Awsare, N.S.; Martin, T.A.; Haynes, M.D.; Matthews, P.N.; Jiang, W.G. Claudin-11 decreases the invasiveness of bladder cancer cells. Oncol. Rep 2011, 25, 1503–1509. [Google Scholar]
  104. Webb, P.G.; Spillman, M.A.; Baumgartner, H.K. Claudins play a role in normal and tumor cell motility. BMC Cell Biol 2013, 14, 19. [Google Scholar]
  105. Choi, Y.L.; Kim, J.; Kwon, M.J.; Choi, J.S.; Kim, T.J.; Bae, D.S.; Koh, S.S.; In, Y.H.; Park, Y.W.; Kim, S.H.; et al. Expression profile of tight junction protein claudin 3 and claudin 4 in ovarian serous adenocarcinoma with prognostic correlation. Histol. Histopathol 2007, 22, 1185–1195. [Google Scholar]
  106. Szasz, A.M.; Nemeth, Z.; Gyorffy, B.; Micsinai, M.; Krenacs, T.; Baranyai, Z.; Harsanyi, L.; Kiss, A.; Schaff, Z.; Tokes, A.M.; et al. Identification of a claudin-4 and E-cadherin score to predict prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Sci 2011, 102, 2248–2254. [Google Scholar]
  107. Lee, K.W.; Lee, N.K.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, M.S.; Yoo, H.Y.; Kim, H.H.; Um, S.H.; Kim, S.H. Twist1 causes the transcriptional repression of claudin-4 with prognostic significance in esophageal cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2012, 423, 454–460. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ersoz, S.; Mungan, S.; Cobanoglu, U.; Turgutalp, H.; Ozoran, Y. Prognostic importance of Claudin-1 and Claudin-4 expression in colon carcinomas. Pathol. Res. Pract 2011, 207, 285–289. [Google Scholar]
  109. Matsuoka, T.; Mitomi, H.; Fukui, N.; Kanazawa, H.; Saito, T.; Hayashi, T.; Yao, T. Cluster analysis of claudin-1 and -4, E-cadherin, and beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers. J. Surg. Oncol 2011, 103, 674–686. [Google Scholar]
  110. Tsutsumi, K.; Sato, N.; Tanabe, R.; Mizumoto, K.; Morimatsu, K.; Kayashima, T.; Fujita, H.; Ohuchida, K.; Ohtsuka, T.; Takahata, S.; et al. Claudin-4 expression predicts survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol 2012, 19, S491–S499. [Google Scholar]
  111. Kyuno, D.; Kojima, T.; Ito, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Tsujiwaki, M.; Takasawa, A.; Murata, M.; Tanaka, S.; Hirata, K.; Sawada, N. Protein kinase Calpha inhibitor enhances the sensitivity of human pancreatic cancer HPAC cells to Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin via claudin-4. Cell Tissue Res 2011, 346, 369–381. [Google Scholar]
  112. Birks, D.K.; Kleinschmidt-DeMasters, B.K.; Donson, A.M.; Barton, V.N.; McNatt, S.A.; Foreman, N.K.; Handler, M.H. Claudin 6 is a positive marker for atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Brain Pathol 2010, 20, 140–150. [Google Scholar]
  113. Yafang, L.; Qiong, W.; Yue, R.; Xiaoming, X.; Lina, Y.; Mingzi, Z.; Ting, Z.; Yulin, L.; Chengshi, Q. Role of estrogen receptor-alpha in the regulation of claudin-6 expression in breast cancer cells. J. Breast Cancer 2011, 14, 20–27. [Google Scholar]
  114. Rendon-Huerta, E.; Teresa, F.; Teresa, G.M.; Xochitl, G.S.; Georgina, A.F.; Veronica, Z.Z.; Montano, L.F. Distribution and expression pattern of claudins 6, 7, and 9 in diffuse- and intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2010, 41, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  115. Lal-Nag, M.; Battis, M.; Santin, A.D.; Morin, P.J. Claudin-6: A novel receptor for CPE-mediated cytotoxicity in ovarian cancer. Oncogenesis 2012, 1, e33. [Google Scholar]
  116. Nubel, T.; Preobraschenski, J.; Tuncay, H.; Weiss, T.; Kuhn, S.; Ladwein, M.; Langbein, L.; Zoller, M. Claudin-7 regulates EpCAM-mediated functions in tumor progression. Mol. Cancer Res 2009, 7, 285–299. [Google Scholar]
  117. Bronstein, J.M.; Chen, K.; Tiwari-Woodruff, S.; Kornblum, H.I. Developmental expression of OSP/claudin-11. J. Neurosci. Res 2000, 60, 284–290. [Google Scholar]
  118. Katsushima, K.; Shinjo, K.; Natsume, A.; Ohka, F.; Fujii, M.; Osada, H.; Sekido, Y.; Kondo, Y. Contribution of microRNA-1275 to Claudin11 protein suppression via a polycomb-mediated silencing mechanism in human glioma stem-like cells. J. Biol. Chem 2012, 287, 27396–27406. [Google Scholar]
  119. Lehmann, B.D.; Bauer, J.A.; Chen, X.; Sanders, M.E.; Chakravarthy, A.B.; Shyr, Y.; Pietenpol, J.A. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J. Clin. Invest 2011, 121, 2750–2767. [Google Scholar]
  120. Asiedu, M.K.; Ingle, J.N.; Behrens, M.D.; Radisky, D.C.; Knutson, K.L. TGFbeta/TNF(alpha)-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates breast cancer stem cells with a claudin-low phenotype. Cancer Res 2011, 71, 4707–4719. [Google Scholar]
  121. Bruna, A.; Greenwood, W.; Le Quesne, J.; Teschendorff, A.; Miranda-Saavedra, D.; Rueda, O.M.; Sandoval, J.L.; Vidakovic, A.T.; Saadi, A.; Pharoah, P.; et al. TGFbeta induces the formation of tumour-initiating cells in claudinlow breast cancer. Nat. Commun 2012, 3, 1055. [Google Scholar]
  122. Morel, A.P.; Hinkal, G.W.; Thomas, C.; Fauvet, F.; Courtois-Cox, S.; Wierinckx, A.; Devouassoux-Shisheboran, M.; Treilleux, I.; Tissier, A.; Gras, B.; et al. EMT inducers catalyze malignant transformation of mammary epithelial cells and drive tumorigenesis towards claudin-low tumors in transgenic mice. PLoS Genet 2012, 8, e1002723. [Google Scholar]
  123. Boylan, K.L.; Misemer, B.; Derycke, M.S.; Andersen, J.D.; Harrington, K.M.; Kalloger, S.E.; Gilks, C.B.; Pambuccian, S.E.; Skubitz, A.P. Claudin 4 is differentially expressed between ovarian cancer subtypes and plays a role in spheroid formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 1334–1358. [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang, G.J.; Xiao, H.X.; Tian, H.P.; Liu, Z.L.; Xia, S.S.; Zhou, T. Upregulation of microRNA-155 promotes the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells through the regulation of claudin-1 expression. Int. J. Mol. Med 2013, 31, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang, L.; Xue, Y.; Shen, Y.; Li, W.; Cheng, Y.; Yan, X.; Shi, W.; Wang, J.; Gong, Z.; Yang, G.; et al. Claudin 6: A novel surface marker for characterizing mouse pluripotent stem cells. Cell. Res 2012, 22, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar]
  126. Turksen, K.; Troy, T.C. Claudin-6: A novel tight junction molecule is developmentally regulated in mouse embryonic epithelium. Dev. Dyn 2001, 222, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
  127. Ben-David, U.; Nudel, N.; Benvenisty, N. Immunologic and chemical targeting of the tight-junction protein Claudin-6 eliminates tumorigenic human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun 2013, 4, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  128. Longley, D.B.; Johnston, P.G. Molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. J. Pathol 2005, 205, 275–292. [Google Scholar]
  129. Stewart, J.J.; White, J.T.; Yan, X.; Collins, S.; Drescher, C.W.; Urban, N.D.; Hood, L.; Lin, B. Proteins associated with Cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells identified by quantitative proteomic technology and integrated with mRNA expression levels. Mol. Cell. Prot 2006, 5, 433–443. [Google Scholar]
  130. Yoshida, H.; Sumi, T.; Zhi, X.; Yasui, T.; Honda, K.; Ishiko, O. Claudin-4: A potential therapeutic target in chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 2011, 31, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar]
  131. Casagrande, F.; Cocco, E.; Bellone, S.; Richter, C.E.; Bellone, M.; Todeschini, P.; Siegel, E.; Varughese, J.; Arin-Silasi, D.; Azodi, M.; et al. Eradication of chemotherapy-resistant CD44+ human ovarian cancer stem cells in mice by intraperitoneal administration of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Cancer 2011, 117, 5519–5528. [Google Scholar]
  132. Santin, A.D.; Cane, S.; Bellone, S.; Palmieri, M.; Siegel, E.R.; Thomas, M.; Roman, J.J.; Burnett, A.; Cannon, M.J.; Pecorelli, S. Treatment of chemotherapy-resistant human ovarian cancer xenografts in C.B-17/SCID mice by intraperitoneal administration of Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin. Cancer Res 2005, 65, 4334–4342. [Google Scholar]
  133. Kim, C.J.; Lee, J.W.; Choi, J.J.; Choi, H.Y.; Park, Y.A.; Jeon, H.K.; Sung, C.O.; Song, S.Y.; Lee, Y.Y.; Choi, C.H.; et al. High claudin-7 expression is associated with a poor response to platinum-based chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 918–925. [Google Scholar]
  134. Thuma, F.; Zoller, M. EpCAM-associated claudin-7 supports lymphatic spread and drug resistance in rat pancreatic cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 855–866. [Google Scholar]
  135. Hoggard, J.; Fan, J.; Lu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Sutton, L.; Chen, Y.H. Claudin-7 increases chemosensitivity to cisplatin through the upregulation of caspase pathway in human NCI-H522 lung cancer cells. Cancer Sci 2013, 104, 611–618. [Google Scholar]
  136. Li, M.; Balch, C.; Montgomery, J.S.; Jeong, M.; Chung, J.H.; Yan, P.; Huang, T.H.; Kim, S.; Nephew, K.P. Integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression reveals specific signaling pathways associated with platinum resistance in ovarian cancer. BMC Med. Genomics 2009, 2, 34. [Google Scholar]
  137. Fortier, A.M.; Asselin, E.; Cadrin, M. Keratin 8 and 18 loss in epithelial cancer cells increases collective cell migration and cisplatin sensitivity through claudin1 up-regulation. J. Biol. Chem 2013, 288, 11555–11571. [Google Scholar]
  138. Li, J.; Sherman-Baust, C.A.; Tsai-Turton, M.; Bristow, R.E.; Roden, R.B.; Morin, P.J. Claudin-containing exosomes in the peripheral circulation of women with ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 244. [Google Scholar]
  139. Resnick, M.B.; Konkin, T.; Routhier, J.; Sabo, E.; Pricolo, V.E. Claudin-1 is a strong prognostic indicator in stage II colonic cancer: A tissue microarray study. Mod. Pathol 2005, 18, 511–518. [Google Scholar]
  140. Morohashi, S.; Kusumi, T.; Sato, F.; Odagiri, H.; Chiba, H.; Yoshihara, S.; Hakamada, K.; Sasaki, M.; Kijima, H. Decreased expression of claudin-1 correlates with recurrence status in breast cancer. Int. J. Mol. Med 2007, 20, 139–143. [Google Scholar]
  141. Kolokytha, P.; Yiannou, P.; Keramopoulos, D.; Kolokythas, A.; Nonni, A.; Patsouris, E.; Pavlakis, K. Claudin-3 and Claudin-4: Distinct prognostic significance in triple-negative and luminal breast cancer. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Lanigan, F.; McKiernan, E.; Brennan, D.J.; Hegarty, S.; Millikan, R.C.; McBryan, J.; Jirstrom, K.; Landberg, G.; Martin, F.; Duffy, M.J.; et al. Increased claudin-4 expression is associated with poor prognosis and high tumour grade in breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 124, 2088–2097. [Google Scholar]
  143. Bernardi, M.A.; Logullo, A.F.; Pasini, F.S.; Nonogaki, S.; Blumke, C.; Soares, F.A.; Brentani, M.M. Prognostic significance of CD24 and claudin-7 immunoexpression in ductal invasive breast cancer. Oncol. Rep 2012, 27, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  144. Yamamoto, T.; Oshima, T.; Yoshihara, K.; Yamanaka, S.; Nishii, T.; Arai, H.; Inui, K.; Kaneko, T.; Nozawa, A.; Woo, T.; et al. Reduced expression of claudin-7 is associated with poor outcome in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncol. Lett 2010, 1, 501–505. [Google Scholar]
  145. Yoshizawa, K.; Nozaki, S.; Kato, A.; Hirai, M.; Yanase, M.; Yoshimoto, T.; Kimura, I.; Sugiura, S.; Okamune, A.; Kitahara, H.; et al. Loss of claudin-7 is a negative prognostic factor for invasion and metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep 2013, 29, 445–450. [Google Scholar]
  146. Cheung, S.T.; Leung, K.L.; Ip, Y.C.; Chen, X.; Fong, D.Y.; Ng, I.O.; Fan, S.T.; So, S. Claudin-10 expression level is associated with recurrence of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res 2005, 11, 551–556. [Google Scholar]
  147. Ohtani, S.; Terashima, M.; Satoh, J.; Soeta, N.; Saze, Z.; Kashimura, S.; Ohsuka, F.; Hoshino, Y.; Kogure, M.; Gotoh, M. Expression of tight-junction-associated proteins in human gastric cancer: Downregulation of claudin-4 correlates with tumor aggressiveness and survival. Gastric Cancer 2009, 12, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  148. Romani, C.; Comper, F.; Bandiera, E.; Ravaggi, A.; Bignotti, E.; Tassi, R.A.; Pecorelli, S.; Santin, A.D. Development and characterization of a human single-chain antibody fragment against claudin-3: A novel therapeutic target in ovarian and uterine carcinomas. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 2009, 201, e71–e79. [Google Scholar]
  149. Suzuki, M.; Kato-Nakano, M.; Kawamoto, S.; Furuya, A.; Abe, Y.; Misaka, H.; Kimoto, N.; Nakamura, K.; Ohta, S.; Ando, H. Therapeutic antitumor efficacy of monoclonal antibody against Claudin-4 for pancreatic and ovarian cancers. Cancer Sci 2009, 100, 1623–1630. [Google Scholar]
  150. Kato-Nakano, M.; Suzuki, M.; Kawamoto, S.; Furuya, A.; Ohta, S.; Nakamura, K.; Ando, H. Characterization and evaluation of the antitumour activity of a dual-targeting monoclonal antibody against claudin-3 and claudin-4. Anticancer Res 2010, 30, 4555–4562. [Google Scholar]
  151. Yuan, X.; Lin, X.; Manorek, G.; Kanatani, I.; Cheung, L.H.; Rosenblum, M.G.; Howell, S.B. Recombinant CPE fused to tumor necrosis factor targets human ovarian cancer cells expressing the claudin-3 and claudin-4 receptors. Mol. Cancer Ther 2009, 8, 1906–1915. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 14 18148f1 1024
Figure 1. Proposed emerging role of claudins in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cells or tumor-initiating cells (CSC/TICs), and chemoresistance or recurrence.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Proposed emerging role of claudins in epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cells or tumor-initiating cells (CSC/TICs), and chemoresistance or recurrence.
Ijms 14 18148f1 1024
Table Table 1. Human claudin genes and protein information.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Human claudin genes and protein information.
GeneChromosomal locationTranscriptProtein size (amino acids)Molecular weight (Da)

The chromosomal location and transcript information (refseq number) of CLDN genes were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information site ( Information on the claudin proteins including protein size and molecular weight were obtained from Universal Protein Resource (UniProt; NA: not available.

Table Table 2. Claudin protein expression in human cancers.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Claudin protein expression in human cancers.
BreastDown [39] (invasive breast carcinoma)
Up [13] (basal type of high-grade invasive ductal breast carcinoma)
Down [42,43]Up [44]Up [44]
Up [13,40] (basal-like type of high-grade invasive ductal breast carcinoma)
Down [39] (invasive ductal breast carcinoma of grade 1)
Down [45] (invasive ductal breast carcinoma)
Up [13] (luminal type of high-grade invasive ductal breast carcinoma)
CervicalUp [46]Up [46]Up [46]Up [46]
ColorectalUp [47,48]Up [47]Up [47]
EsophagealUp [49]Up [49]Down [50]
GastricUp [41]Up [41]Up [41,51]Up [52]Down [53]
LiverDown [54]
MelanomaUp [55]
OvarianUp [5661] (normal: ovarian surface epithelium)
Down [64] (normal: fallopian tube)
Up [56,57,6062]

Down [64] (normal: fallopian tube)
Up [63]
ProstateDown [65]Down [42]Up [66]Up [66]Down [65]
PancreaticUp [67,68]
UterineUp [69]Up [69]
Table Table 3. Roles of claudins in human cancer.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Roles of claudins in human cancer.
ClaudinsCancerFunctionIn vitro or in vivoRoleReferences
Claudin-1BreastIncrease of cell migrationIn vitroCancer promoting[88]
BreastAnti-apoptotic effectIn vitroCancer promoting[89]
ColonIncrease of invasion and metastatic behaviorIn vitro & in vivoCancer promoting[48]
LiverIncrease of invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[90]
LiverInduction of EMTIn vitroCancer promoting[91]
MelanomaIncrease of cell motility and invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[55]
OralIncrease of invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[92]
GastricInhibition of tumorigenicityIn vivoTumor suppressive[72]
LungInhibition of cell migration and invasion, in vivo metastasisIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[93]

Claudin-3OvarianIncrease of invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[94]
OvarianPromoting in vivo tumor growth and metastasisIn vivoCancer promoting[95]
OvarianInhibition of in vivo tumor growth and metastasisIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[64]
OvarianSuppression of EMTIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[96]

Claudin-4OvarianIncrease of invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[94]
OvarianStimulation of angiogenesisIn vitro & in vivoCancer promoting[97]
GastricInhibition of migration and invasionIn vitroTumor suppressive[7]
OvarianSuppression of EMTIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[96]
PancreaticSuppression of cell invasion and metastasisIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[81]

Claudin-6GastricIncrease of proliferation, migration and invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[98]
BreastInhibition of anchorageindependent growthIn vitroTumor suppressive[99]
BreastInhibition of anchorageindependent growth, migration and invasionIn vitroTumor suppressive[100]

Claudin-7ColorectalIncrease of cell proliferation and tumorigenicityIn vitro & in vivoCancer promoting[80]
OvarianIncrease of invasionIn vitroCancer promoting[101]
EsophagealDecrease of cell growth and invasionIn vitroTumor suppressive[84]
LungInhibition of migration and invasion, in vivo tumor growthIn vitro & in vivoTumor suppressive[102]

Claudin-11BladderInhibition of cell invasionIn vitroTumor suppressive[103]
GastricInhibition of cell invasionIn vitroTumor suppressive[53]
Table Table 4. Clinical significance of claudin expression in human cancers.

Click here to display table

Table 4. Clinical significance of claudin expression in human cancers.
ClaudinsCancer typesAssociation of claudin protein expression based on IHC and patient survivalPrognosisIndependent prognostic factorReference
Claudin-1BreastLow expression→shorter disease-free intervalLow→poor[140]
ColonLow expression→shorter overall survival and disease-free survivalLow→poorIndependent predictor of recurrence and positive prognostic factor[139]
ColorectalLow expression→shorter cancer-specific and disease-free survivalLow→poor[109]
ProstateLow expression→shorter recurrence-free survivalLow→poorIndependent predictor of recurrence[65]
Claudin-3BreastPositive expression→shorter disease-free survival (triple-negative)
Positive expression→longer disease-free survival (luminal)
High→poor (triple-negative)
High→better (luminal)
OvarianHigh expression→shorter survivalHigh→poorIndependent negative prognostic factor[105]
Claudin-4BreastHigh expression→shorter cancer-specific survival, overall survival and recurrence-free survivalHigh→poorIndependent negative prognostic factor[142]
BreastPositive expression→longer disease-free survival (triple-negative)
Positive expression→shorter disease-free survival (luminal type)
High→better (triple-negative)
High→poor (luminal )
ColorectalLow expression shorter cancer-specific and disease-free survivalLow→poor[109]
EsophagealTwist1 high/claudin-4 low expression→shorter overall survivalTwist1 high/claudin-4 low→poorIndependent positive prognostic factor[107]
GastricModerate to strong staining→shorter overall survivalHigh→poorIndependent negative prognostic factor[41]
GastricHigh membranous expression→longer overall survivalHigh→betterIndependent positive prognostic factor[7]
PancreaticLow gene expression *→shorter overall survivalLow→poorIndependent positive prognostic factor[110]
Claudin-7BreastPositive expression→shorter recurrence-free survivalHigh→poor[143]
LungLow expression→shorter overall survivalLow→poor[144]
OralPositive expression→better prognosisHigh→better[145]
Claudin-10LiverHigh gene expression *→shorter disease-free survivalHigh→poorIndependent prognostic factor for disease recurrence[146]

IHC: Immunohistochemistry.*Claudin gene expression by qRT-PCR.

Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert