Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(7), 14204-14213; doi:10.3390/ijms140714204

Article
Facile Synthesis of FeCo/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite with High Wave-Absorbing Properties
Yu Gu 1, Yang Cao 2, Huijuan Chi 2, Qing Liang 2, Yongji Zhang 2 and Youyi Sun 1,2,*
1
Department of Mechanics, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; E-Mail: yugu@bjtu.edu.cn
2
Research Center for Engineering Technology of Polymeric Composites of Shanxi Province, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China; E-Mails: 13994217058@126.com (Y.C.); huijuanchi@126.com (H.C.); liangq@163.com (Q.L.); zyj@nuc.edu.cn (Y.Z.)
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: syyi@mail.ustc.edu.cn; Tel./Fax: +86-10-6275-7417.
Received: 21 March 2013; in revised form: 20 June 2013 / Accepted: 21 June 2013 /
Published: 9 July 2013

Abstract

: The FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was synthesized using the hydrothermal approach, in which the FeCo alloy and Fe3O4 are formed by one step. The structure of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was characterized by means of Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometer spectroscopy (EDX). They show that the mass ratio of FeCo/Fe3O4 strongly depends on the reaction temperature. Such various architectures follow a stepwise growth mechanism of the composites prepared in various reaction temperatures were also discussed. It indicates that this strategy is facile, effective and controllable for the synthesis of FeCo/Fe3O4 by the one-step method. Furthermore, the magnetic and wave-absorbing properties of the nanocomposites with various structures were investigated in detail. The results show that the FeCo/Fe3O4 with higher mass ratio has higher magnetic properties. Moreover, the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite shows high wave-absorbing properties (e.g., −37.9 dB), which are expected to apply in microwave absorbing materials.
Keywords:
Fe3O4/FeCo; hydrothermal; one-step; magnetic; microwave absorbing

1. Introduction

With the objective of solving the expanded electromagnetic (EM) interference problems, considerable theoretical and experimental investigations have been focused on effective EM-wave-absorption materials with a strong absorption, a low density and a high resistivity in a wide frequency range [1,2]. Among the candidates for EM-wave absorbers, FeCo materials have high saturation magnetization, so that their complex-permeability values remain high in the gigahertz range, for which it is possible to make thinner absorbers [3,4]. However, FeCo materials have a high electric conductivity and are easy to oxidation, which drastically decreases the wave-absorbing properties [5]. Regarding this problem, among several methods for covering their surface, such as polymers, alkyl ligands, SiO2, metal oxides, graphitic carbon (GC) is the most suitable option from the standpoint of thermal stability, low electric conductivity and chemical inertness [614]. These synthesis method of core/shell nanostructures involved multi-step processes and each step was not simple, such as the synthesis of FeCo NPs with GC shells generally requires large-scale instruments for arc plasma sputtering or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) or uses the precise synthesis involving toxic Fe(CO)5 and a unique Co complex [12]. In addition to this, Fe3O4 have been widely applied because of their high hardness, good wear resistance, high resistivity and outstanding mechanical properties at high temperatures [15]. However, there few works reporting the preparation and wave-absorption of Fe3O4 coated FeCo particles.

In this work, a new synthesis method of Fe3O4 coated FeCo particles was reported. The present method shows an easy processing and does not high temperature treatment and multi-step to attain final FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. Moreover, the EM characteristics of Fe3O4 coated FeCo nanocapsules have been studied at 2–18 GHz. The results indicate that the Fe3O4 coated FeCo nanocapsules may be applicable in EM-wave absorptive devices.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preparation of the FeCo/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite

The formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite is firstly confirmed by the XRD and SEM as shown in Figure 1. From the Figure 1A, it is found that there are a series of characteristic peaks (at 2θ = 29.0°, 34.5°, 42.5°, 52.5°, 56.5°, 62.0° and 73.5°), which are indexed to (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440) and (533) of Fe3O4, respectively [15,16]. As also shown in Figure 1A, besides the characteristic diffraction peaks of Fe3O4, the diffraction peaks at 44.5° and 82.5° can be indexed to (111) and (211) of the FeCo with FCC crystal structure, respectively [17]. These results suggest that the products consist of FeCo and Fe3O4, indicating the formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. The typical surface morphology of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite is characterized by the SEM as shown in Figure 1B. It clearly shows that the large quantity of uniform spherical particles with an average diameter of 210.0 nm can be achieved via the present method. At the same time, it also shows the good dispersion of the spherical particles. These results are difficult to observe in previous works [1820], here it is attributed to the protection of PVP on the surface of nanocomposite.

It is found that the formation and structure of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite strongly depends on the reaction temperature as shown in Figure 2. In the present synthesis method, the products are difficult to be obtained at lower than 130 °C. As shown in Figure 2, all obtained products prepared at higher than 130 °C show similar distinctive diffraction peaks, which are assigned to FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. The result indicates that in order to get the single phase of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite, the reaction temperature must be higher than 130 °C. At the same time, it also shows that the intensity of diffraction peak (44.5°) assigned to FeCo (in Figure 2B,C) clearly increases compared with the result of Figure 2A. The result indicates that the mass ratio of FeCo/Fe3O4 increases with increase in reaction temperature. It is well known that the absence and presence of the core peaks in the cases of the core-shell particles depend on the thickness of the shell [21,22]. Here, the FeCo peaks in the cases of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite are relatively slight compared with Fe3O4 peaks. These results further indicate the formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 core-shell particles and the thickness of Fe3O4 shell decreases with increase in reaction temperature.

The above results are further confirmed by EDX spectroscopy as shown in Figure 3 and Table 1. Figure 3 shows similar curves and confirms the presence of Fe, Co and O elemental signatures for all samples [2325]. The result further confirms the formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. At the same time, the analysis also identifies that the mass ration of FeCo/Fe3O4 increases with increase in reaction temperature, as shown in Table 1. When the products were prepared at 170 °C, the largest mass ratio (ca. 4.8) of FeCo/Fe3O4 is observed. Here, the mass weight of FeCo is more than that of Fe3O4 in the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites. But, according to results of Figure 2, the FeCo peaks are difficult to observe, and the Fe3O4 peaks are clear and strong. The result is attributed to that the surface of FeCo is coated with Fe3O4, indicating the formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 core-shell particles [21,22,25].

The surface morphology of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite as function of reaction temperature was also characterized by SEM images as shown in Figure 4. It shows that the products prepared at 130 °C exhibit irregular morphology. When the reaction temperature is higher than 130 °C, the irregular particles transferees into spherical particles as shown in Figure 4B,C. At the same time, it also shows that the average size of spherical particles increase from 210.0 to 320.0 nm with increase in reaction temperature from 150 to 170 °C. It is well known that the formation of small particles is kinetically favored and that the formation of large particles is thermodynamically favored. From a standpoint of kinetics, small particles are easier to nucleate. However, small particles have larger surface area-to-volume ratio and represent a higher energy state than large particles. Hence, small FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites are easily formed at lower temperature.

On the basis of the above experimental results, it is believed that the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite is prepared by a one-step method. Then what is the possible formation process for the FeCo/Fe3O4 composite particles? It is well known that as iron is a metal much more electropositive than cobalt, the reduction of Fe° cannot be achieved by polyols which are too weak reducing agents. Generally, the reducing agent (e.g., NaBH4 and N2H4·H2O) was introduced into the reaction, and the FeCo alloy was prepared by the hydrothermal approach [1921]. Of course, the FeCo/Fe3O4 is difficult to be formed in these works [2628]. Here, an alternative way to try to produce Fe° particles by precipitation from a liquid phase is the disproportionation of ferrous hydroxide. Actually, the formation of iron from suspension of Fe(OH)2 has been observed in water at high temperature [29], at the same time, the Fe3O4 is also easily formed as shown in Scheme 1. In particular, the increasing reaction temperature during the precipitation of the starting hydroxide increases Fe° formation yield [28]. In addition to this, the solid hydroxides Co(OH)2 initially form when excessive NaOH solution is added to the mixture solution of Co(Ac)2·4H2O. The Co2+ ions also released from their solid hydroxides are simultaneously reduced to metallic atoms, which spontaneously form FeCo alloyed nuclei. The relevant growth mechanism of composites can be summarized as shown in Scheme 1.

2.2. Properties of the FeCo/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite

The M-H loops of products prepared at various temperatures were further compared as shown in Figure 5. It clearly shows that the Ms of nanocomposite increases with increase in reaction temperature as shown in Table 2. The highest Ms (ca. 112.8 emu/g) of nanocomposite prepared at 170 °C is observed in this study. These results are attributed to that the mass ratio of FeCo/Fe3O4 increases with increases in reaction temperature, which is consistent with the result of XRD. Moreover, it is found that the Ms of the nanocomposite is almost similar with that of pure FeCo alloy [2628]. The result indicates that the Fe3O4 coated FeCo effectively shields the magnetic nanoparticles (FeCo alloy) against environmental degradation, and keeps the magnetic properties unchanged. In addition to this, it shows that the effect of reaction temperature on the coercivity (Hc) is slight.

The reflection loss (RL) values of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites as a function of frequency are shown in Figure 6. It clearly shows that an optimal RL of −37.9 dB is reached at 5.2 GHz and the absorption exceeding −20.0 dB is obtained in the range (4.9–8.6 GHz and 14.0–16.8 GHz). Compared with FeCo alloy, the maximum RL of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites increases by about 20%–40% [3032]. The special core-shell structure of the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites may additionally contribute to the excellent absorption properties as shown in following: (1) the dielectric Fe3O4 shell is responsible for increasing the dielectric losses in the FeCo nanocapsules; (2) as a magnetically inactive layer, it causes a demagnetizing field and prevents the magnetic interaction between the magnetic components, which leads to increased magnetic losses in the FeCo nanocapules. These features illuminate that the microwave absorbing properties of this composite are mainly due to the magnetic and dielectric loss together. At the same reason, the Fe3O4 shell in the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites is thicker, and the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposites are wider absorbing-bandwidth as shown in Figure 6. Compared to expensive microwave absorbing materials, the price of these magnetic spheres is very low; therefore, this is an effective way to reduce the cost of absorbing materials and broaden absorbing bandwidth by adjust the preparation conditions of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.

3. Experimental Sections

3.1. Materials

The chemicals used in the experiments were ferrum (II) chloride (FeCl2·4H2O), Cobalt acetate (Co(Ac)2·4H2O), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), ethanol and ethanediol. All chemicals were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagents Company and used without further purification.

3.2. Preparation of FeCo/Fe3O4 Nanocomposite

In a typical procedure, 0.58 g FeCl2·4H2O and 0.31 g Co(Ac)2·4H2O were dissolved in 30 mL ethanediol solution. Subsequently, 10 mL ethanol containing 0.05 g PVP and 1.6 g NaOH was added into above solution. The mixture was stirred vigorously and then was transferred into a Teflon cup in a stainless steel-lined autoclave. The autoclave was maintained at 130 °C (150 °C or 170 °C) and then was cooled down to room temperature. A black fluffy solid product was deposited on the bottom of the Teflon cup, indicating the formation of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite. The final product was collected by a magnet and rinsed with distilled water and ethanol three times to remove any salts, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C for 6 h.

3.3. Characterization

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded with a Rigaku D/Max-2000 diffractometer equipped with a Cu KR radiation source (λ = 0.15, 418 nm). The scanning range was from 15° to 90° and the scanning interval was 0.01°.

Morphologies of the samples were studied by a Hitachi Su-1500 scanning electron microscope (SEM). The element composition was characterized by a Horiba EX-250 X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDX) associated with SEM.

The hysteresis loops were conducted by using a Model-4HF vibrating sample magnetometer at room temperature with a maximum magnetic field of 15 kOe. For magnetization measurements, the powder was pressed strongly and fixed in a small cylindrical plastic box.

The microwave-absorbing properties were measured on an Agilent Vector Network Analyzer in the 2–18 GHz, composite materials were prepared by dispersing the FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite in paraffin wax with cylindrical toroidal specimens of 2 mm thickness, respectively, and the mass fraction of powders was 50%.

4. Conclusions

The FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite was synthesized by using one-step solution method. Their structure and magnetic properties were determined by the XRD, SEM and VSM. These results indicate that the formation and magnetic properties of the composite particles depend on the reaction temperature. In order to obtain FeCo/Fe3O4 composite particles with uniform size and shape, the reaction temperature should to be higher than 130 °C. The high Ms (112.8 emu/g) of composite particles prepared at 170 °C was obtained. Moreover, the FeCo microspheres exhibit excellent EM properties. It is found that the optimal value of RL is −37.9 dB at 5.4 GHz for a layer 2.0 mm layer. The present work provides a new synthesis method of FeX (Co, Ni and so on)/Fe3O4 composite particles, which is expected to apply in EM materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the support by National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants (11090330, 11090331, 11072003 and 11202006), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2012M510269) and the National Basic Research Program of China (G2010CB832701).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yan, S.J.; Zhen, L.; Xu, C.Y.; Jiang, J.T.; Shao, W.Z.; Tang, J.K. Synthesis, characterization and electromagnetic properties of Fe1−xCox alloy flower-like microparticles. J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater 2011, 323, 515–520.
  2. Zhu, J.J.; Wei, S.Y.; Haldolaarachchige, N.; Young, D.P.; Guo, Z.H. Electromagnetic field shielding polyurethane nanocomposites reinforced with core-shell Fe-Silica nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 15304–15310.
  3. Han, M.G.; Lu, H.P.; Deng, L.J. Control of gigahertz permeability and permittivity dispersion by means of nanocrystallization in FeCo based nanocrystalline alloy. Appl. Phys. Lett 2010, 97, 192507. :1–192507:3.
  4. Wei, X.W.; Zhu, G.X.; Liu, Y.J.; Ni, Y.H.; Song, Y.; Xu, Z. Large-scale controlled synthesis of FeCo nanocubes and microcages by wet chemistry. Chem. Mater 2008, 20, 6248–6253.
  5. Han, Z.; Li, D.; Wang, H.; Li, X.G.; Li, J.; Geng, D.Y.; Zhang, Z.D. Broadband electromagnetic wave absorption by FeCo/C nanocapsules. Appl. Phys. Lett 2009, 95, 209901. :1–209901:3.
  6. Elena, H.; Ilana, P.; Aharon, G. Synthesis of air stable FeCo/C alloy nanoparticles by decomposing a mixture of the corresponding Metal-Acetyl Acetonates under their autogenic pressure. Inorg. Chem 2011, 50, 1288–1294.
  7. Bai, J.M.; Xu, Y.-H.; Thomas, J.; Wang, J.-P. (FeCo)3Si-SiOx core-shell nanoparticles fabricated in the gas phase. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 065701–065705.
  8. Mendoza-Reséndez, R.; Pozas, R.; Morales, M.P.; Bonville, P.; Ocaña, M.; Serna, C.J. FeCo magnetic nanoneedles obtained by Co-coating haematite. Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 647–654.
  9. Srikanth, H.; Hajndl, R.; Chrinos, C.; Sanders, J.; Sampath, A.; Sudarshan, T.S. Magnetic studies of polymer-coated Fe nanoparticles synthesized by microwave plasma polymerization. Appl. Phys. Lett 2001, 79, 3503–3505.
  10. Chauvey, G.S.; Barcena, C.; Poudyal, N.; Rong, C.; Gao, J.; Sun, S.; Liu, J.P. Synthesis and stabilization of FeCo nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 7214–7215.
  11. Desvaux, C.; Amiens, C.; Fejes, P.; Respaud, P.M.; Lecante, P.; Snoeck, E.; Chaydret, B. Multimillimetre-large superlattices of air-stable iron-cobalt nanoparticles. Nat. Mater 2005, 4, 750–753.
  12. Turgut, Z.; Scott, J.H.; Huang, M.W.; Majetich, S.A.; MaHenry, M.E. Magnetic properties and ordering in C-coated Fex-Co1−x Alloy nanocrystals. J. Appl. Phys 1998, 83, 6468–6470.
  13. Li, Y.; Kim, Y.J.; Kim, A.Y.; Lee, K.; Jung, M.H.; Hur, N.H.; Park, K.H.; Seo, W.S. Highly stable and magnetically recyclable mesoporous silica spheres embedded with FeCo/graphitic shell nanocrystals for supported catalysts. Chem. Mater 2011, 23, 5398–5403.
  14. Wei, S.Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, J.H.; Sun, L.Y.; Line, H.F.; Guo, Z.H. Multifunctional composite core-shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 4474–4502.
  15. Sun, Y.Y.; Tian, Y.; He, M.H.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, C.; Hu, C.S.; Liu, Y.Q. Controlled synthesis of Fe3O4/Ag core-shell composite nanoparticles with high electrical conductivity. J. Electron. Mater 2012, 41, 519–523.
  16. Sun, Y.Y.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y.Q.; Zhao, G.Z.; Jiang, Y. Effect of magnetic nanoparticles on the properties of magnetic rubber. Mater. Res. Bull 2010, 45, 878–881.
  17. Rafique, M.Y.; Pan, L.Q.; Iqbal, M.Z.; Javed, Q.U.A.; Qiu, H.M.; Rafi-ud-din Farooq, M.H.; Guo, Z.G. 3-D flower like FeCo alloy nanostructures assembled with nanotriangular prism: Facile synthesis, magnetic properties, and effect of NaOH on its formation. J. Alloys Comp. 2013, 550, 423–430.
  18. Cho, U.R.; Wang, K.; Kim, G.W.; Koo, B.H. Effects of Ag seed on synthesis of FeCo nano-particles prepared via the polyol method. J. Mater. Sci. Technol 2010, 26, 660–664.
  19. Hayashi, N.; Toriyama, T.; Yamashiro, M.; Moriwaki, T.; Oguri, Y.; Fukuda, K.; Sakamoto, I.; Hasegaw, M. Synthesis of nanosized FeCo granular alloys by ion implantation and TMR effect. Nuclear Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 2007, 257, 25–29.
  20. Yang, Y.; Xu, C.L.; Xia, Y.X.; Wang, T.; Li, S. Synthesis and microwave absorption properties of FeCo nanoplates. J. Alloys Comp 2010, 493, 549–552.
  21. Liu, H.L.; Sonn, C.H.; Wu, J.H.; Lee, K.M.; Kim, Y.K. Synthesis of streptavidin-FITC conjugated core-shell Fe3O4-Au nanocrystals and their application for the purification of CD4+ lymphocytes. Biomaterials 2008, 9, 4003–4011.
  22. Liu, H.L.; Hou, P.; Zhang, W.X.; Wu, J.H. Synthesis of monosized core–shell Fe3O4/Au multifunctional nanoparticles by PVP-assisted nanoemulsion process. Colloids Surf. A 2010, 356, 21–27.
  23. Qi, Z.; Ian, B.; Virginia, M.; Yan, Z.C. Soft ferromagnetism in nanostructured mechanical alloying FeCo-based powders. J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater 2007, 318, 28–38.
  24. Lu, X.Y.; Niu, M.; Qiao, R.R.; Gao, M.Y. Superdispersible PVP-coated Fe3O4 nanocrystals prepared by a “one-pot” reaction. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 14390–14394.
  25. Kolhatkar, A.G.; Nekrashevich, I.; Litvinov, D.; Willson, R.C.; Lee, T.R. Cubic silica-coated and amine-functionalized FeCo nanoparticles with high saturation magnetization. Chem. Mater 2013, 25, 1092–1097.
  26. Soo Ja, S.; Kim, Y.H.; Kim, C.W.; Cha, H.G.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, Y.S. Preparation of magnetic FeCo nanoparticles by coprecipitation route. Curr. Appl. Phys 2007, 7, 404–408.
  27. Mohanty, S.R.; Lee, P.; Tan, T.L.; Springham, S.V.; Patran, A.; Ramanujan, R.V.; Rawat, R.S. Effect of deposition parameters on morphology and size of FeCo nanoparticles synthesized by pulsed laser ablation deposition. Appl. Surface Sci 2006, 252, 2806–2816.
  28. Azizi, A.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K.; Hasani, A. Morphology and magnetic properties of FeCo nanocrystalline powder produced by modified mechanochemical procedure. J. Magnet. Magnet. Mater 2010, 322, 3551–3554.
  29. Viau, G.F.; Et-Vincent, F.; Fihet, F. Nucleation and growth of bimetallic CoNi and FeNi monodisperse particles prepared in polyols. Solid State Tonics 1996, 84, 259–270.
  30. Liu, X.G.; Geng, D.Y.; Zhang, Z.D. Microwave-absorption properties of FeCo microspheres self-assembled by Al2O3-coated FeCo nanocapsules. Appl. Phys. Lett 2008, 92, 243110. :1–243110:3.
  31. Liu, X.G.; Geng, D.Y.; Ma, S.; Meng, H.; Tong, M.; Kang, D.J.; Zhang, Z.D. Electromagnetic wave absorption properties of FeCo nanocapsules and coral-like aggregates self-assembled by the nanocapsules. J. Appl. Phys 2008, 104, 064319. :1–064319:5.
  32. Han, Z.; Li, D.; Wang, X.W.; Zhang, Z.D. Microwave response of FeCo/carbon nanotubes composites. J. Appl. Phys 2011, 109, 07. A301:1–07A301:3.
Ijms 14 14204f1 200
Figure 1. (A) XRD; and (B) SEM image of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. (A) XRD; and (B) SEM image of FeCo/Fe3O4 nanocomposite.
Ijms 14 14204f1 1024
Ijms 14 14204f2 200
Figure 2. XRD pattern of FeCo-Fe3O4 composite particles prepared at various temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 2. XRD pattern of FeCo-Fe3O4 composite particles prepared at various temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
Ijms 14 14204f2 1024
Ijms 14 14204f3 200
Figure 3. EDX spectroscopy of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 3. EDX spectroscopy of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
Ijms 14 14204f3 1024
Ijms 14 14204f4 200
Figure 4. SEM images of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 4. SEM images of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
Ijms 14 14204f4 1024
Ijms 14 14204f5 200
Figure 5. VSM of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 5. VSM of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
Ijms 14 14204f5 1024
Ijms 14 14204f6 200
Figure 6. Reflection losses of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 6. Reflection losses of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
Ijms 14 14204f6 1024
Ijms 14 14204f7 200
Scheme 1. Illustration of formation of core-shell composite particles by one-step method.

Click here to enlarge figure

Scheme 1. Illustration of formation of core-shell composite particles by one-step method.
Ijms 14 14204f7 1024
Table 1. Element weight of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Element weight of products prepared at various reaction temperatures (A) 130 °C; (B) 150 °C; and (C) 170 °C.
SamplesABC
ElementCoFeOCoFeOCoFeO
Mass Weight (%)30.151.28.536.351.36.339.949.64.3
Mass ratio1.93.14.8
Table 2. Ms of products prepared at various reaction temperature.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Ms of products prepared at various reaction temperature.
Reaction conditions130 °C150 °C170 °C
Ms (emu/g)88.692.4112.8
Hc (Gs)148.5148.0148.2
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert