- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14(12), 24399-24411; doi:10.3390/ijms141224399
Published: 16 December 2013
Abstract: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is an essential component of anticancer chemotherapy against gastric cancer. However, the response rate of single drug is still limited. The ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b is a negative regulator of growth factor receptor signaling and is involved in the suppression of cancer cell proliferation. However, whether Cbl-b could affect 5-FU sensitivity remains unclear. The present study showed that Cbl-b knockdown caused higher proliferation concomitant with the decrease of apoptosis induced by 5-FU treatment in gastric cancer cell. Further mechanism investigation demonstrated that Cbl-b knockdown caused significant increase of phosphorylation of EGFR, ERK and Akt, decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential, and increase of expression ratio of Bcl-2/Bax. These results suggest that Cbl-b enhances sensitivity to 5-FU via EGFR- and mitochondria-mediated pathways in gastric cancer cells.
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and is treated mainly with surgery and chemotherapy. In patients with unresectable disease, chemotherapy is the main course of treatment and has been shown to improve overall survival ; however, the prognosis remains poor . In addition, adverse effects of cytotoxic chemotherapy often result in deterioration of the quality of life of patients with advanced gastric cancer. Therefore, more effective treatment strategies that are better tolerated are needed.
5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent in gastrointestinal malignancies, including gastric cancer . However, the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU is limited; a better understanding of pathways that might contribute to sensitivity or resistance of gastric cancer to 5-FU could therefore contribute towards improvement of the therapeutic effects of 5-FU in gastric cancer. EGFR-dependent survival pathways are known to contribute to chemo-resistance  and recent studies suggest the involvement of EGFR-mediated survival signaling in 5-FU sensitivity [5–11]. Thus, mechanisms that regulate EGFR signaling could contribute to 5-FU sensitivity in gastric cancer.
Cbl proteins function as E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligases . Its RING finger domain recruits aUb-conjugating enzyme (E2); and its tyrosine kinase-binding (TKB) domain (which includes a Src homology 2 domain or SH2 domain) binds to target proteins with cognate phosphotyrosine-containing motifs, which are thereby targeted for Ub modification [13,14]. Cbl-b, a member of the Cbl E3 family, is abundantly expressed in hemopoietic cells and has been demonstrated to negatively regulate the activation of hematopoietic cell lineages such as T cells, B cells, and mast cells via their tyrosine kinase-asscoaited surface receptors . It has also been shown that the p85 regulatory subunit of PI3 kinase (PI3K) serves a substrate for Cbl-b during activation of T cells and Cbl-b functions as a negative regulator of p85 in a ubiquitin-dependent but proteolysis-independent manner [16,17]. Cbl-b-deficient inhibited Akt and ERK phosphorylation and deregulation of T cell proliferation . Our previous studies showed that clinically-used chemotherapeutic drugs, such as etoposide (VP-16), epirubicin (EPI), daunorubicin (DNR), and arsenic trioxide (ATO) upregulated the expression of Cbl proteins in leukemic cell lines and that Cbl-b increased chemosensitivity by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt signaling [19–21]. As the role of Cbl-b in non-hematopoeitic cell systems has not been investigated in detail and activation of EGFR is known to contribute to chemoresistance in epithelial cancers, the present studies examined the relationship of Cbl-b and EGFR in the modulation of tumor cell sensitivity to 5-FU. Our analyses show that Cbl-b depletion through knockdown reduced the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells and this was associated with increased proliferation and enhanced EGFR survival signaling, thereby leading us to conclude that induction of Cbl-b promotes chemosensitivity in gastric cancer by restricting the activation of EGFR survival signaling.
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Effects of 5-FU on Cell Viability and Apoptosis in Gastric Cancer Cells
To assess the sensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU, three gastric cancer cell lines (MGC803, BGC823and SGC7901) were treated with various concentrations of 5-FU for 48 h and reduction in viable cells were assessed using the MTT assay. As shown in Figure 1A, 5-FU triggered dose-dependent cytotoxicity towards all of the cell lines tested with IC50 values of 2.0 ± 0.9, 1.3 ± 0.8, and 4.5 ± 1.1 μg/mL for MGC803, BGC823and SGC7901 cell lines, respectively. We further assessed the induction by 5-FU in three gastric cancer cell lines after exposure to 2 μg/mL 5-FU for 48 h by measuring a reduction in MTT dye incorporation from baseline (Figure 1B). After 5-FU treatment, 25%, 33% and 29% increase in apoptotic cell was observed in SGC7901, BGC823 and MGC803 cells respectively. To identify the mechanism of 5-FU-induced apoptosis in MGC803 cells, we measured the mitochondrial membrane potential and investigated the levels of proteins related to apoptosis. 5-FU induced decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1C). Treatment with 2 μg/mL 5-FU for 48 h induced down-regulation of antiapoptotic molecule Bcl-2, and up-regulation of pro-apoptotic molecule Bax. Expression of Bcl-2/Bax ratio decreased 5-fold (Figure 1D). These results indicate that 5-FU inhibits proliferation and promotes apoptosis in gastric cancer cells.
2.2. Effects of 5-FU on EGFR, ERK, and Akt Expression in MGC803 Cells
The effects of 5-FU (2 μg/mL) on phosphorylation of EGFR, ERK, and Akt in MGC803 cell line were tested by western blot analysis. The levels of phospho-EGFR were elevated by 1 h, peaked at 6 h and decreased by 48 h. Phospho-ERK and phospho-Akt levels also increased (Figures 2A). We next investigated whether inhibitors of MAPK (PD98059) or PI3K (LY294002) could affect 5-FU-induced apoptosis in MGC803 cells. As shown in Figure 2B, 20 μmol/L PD98059 or 25 μmol/L LY294002 alone had little effect on apoptosis. However, when cells were pretreated with PD98059 or LY294002 and then exposed to 25 μg/mL 5-FU, the percentage of apoptotic cells increased from 14.62% to 25.41% and 40.63%, respectively. These results are consistent with a role for the EGFR/ERK/Akt signaling pathway in modulating the level of 5-FU induced apoptosis in MGC803 gastric cancer cells.
2.3. Effects of EGFR Inhibitor and 5-FU on ERK and Akt in MGC803 Cells
We examined the effects of EGFR inhibitor (C225) and 5-FU on MGC803 cells proliferation. As shown in Figure 3A, with combined treatment of 5-FU and C225, proliferation inhibition rate increased from 37% to 44%. As shown in Figure 3B, p-EGFR, pERK and pAkt expression decreased. These results indicated that C225 and 5-FU showed additional antitumor effect. Combined treatment of 5-FU and C225 significantly inhibit the activation of Akt and ERK.
2.4. Effects of Cbl-b on 5-FU Chemosensitivity in MGC803 Cells
We previously established stable cell line of non-silencing control shRNA and Cbl-b shRNA in MGC803 cells as a tool to examine the mechanism of Cbl-b. As shown in Figure 3A, Cbl-b expression was essentially undetectable in Cbl-b shRNA of MGC803 cells, whereas it was detected in non-silencing control of MGC803 cells (Figure 4A). Notably, analyses using the MTT assay (Figure 4B) showed that knockdown of Cbl-b led to relative resistance to 5-FU: compared to an IC50 value of 2.57 ± 0.7 μg/mL for non-silencing control cells, the IC50 value for Cbl-b knockdown cells was 10.67 ± 5.0 μg/mL (p = 0.001). Furthermore, flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis showed reduced level of apoptosis in Cbl-b shRNA cells: 18% ± 3.0% apoptotic cells were observed in Cbl-b shRNA cells treated with 2 μg/mL 5-FU for 48 h compared to 32% ± 4.0% apoptotic cells in the non-silencing control cell line (Figure 4C; p = 0.001). 5-FU induced the increase of mitochondrialmembrane potential was reversed by Cbl-b knockdown (Figure 4D). Expression of Bcl-2/Bax ratio was also increased (Figure 4E). Knockdown of Cbl-b promotes the proliferation of gastric cancer cells and inhibits their apoptosis. These results indicate that Cbl-b enhances sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil via mitochondria-mediated pathways in gastric cancer cells.
2.5. Effects of Cbl-b on 5-FU-Induced EGFR, REK, and Akt Activation
Since Cbl proteins are negative regulators of EGFR signaling, Cbl-b may promote 5-FU chemosensitivity in gastric cancer cells by regulating the level of EGFR survival signaling. To evaluate this hypothesis, we compared the levels of phosphorylated EGFR, ERK, and Akt activation upon 5-FU treatment in non-silencing control vs. Cbl-b shRNA expressing MGC803 cells. Western blot analyses of lysates from cells treated with 2 μg/mL 5-FU for 6 and 48 h (Figure 5A) showed that while phosphorylation of EGFR diminished to almost undetectable levels by 48 h in control vector-expressing cells, the signals were still very strong in Cbl-b shRNA cells. Sustained signals were also observed for pERK and pAkt in Cbl-b knockdown cells compared to control cells (Figure 5B,C). These results support the proposal that Cbl-b promotes chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells by limiting EGFR survival signaling via ERK and Akt.
3. Experimental Section
3.1. Reagents and Antibodies
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO), PD98059 and LY294002 were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was obtained from Wako Inc. (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, VA, USA). C225 were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Antibodies against Cbl-b, Bcl-2, Bax and β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Antibodies against EGFR and phospho-EGFR, ERK and phospho-ERK, Akt and phospho-Akt were from Cell Signaling Inc. (Frankfurt am Maine, Germany).
3.2. Cells and Cell Culture
The gastric cancer cell lines (MGC 803, BGC 823 and SGC 7901) were obtained from the Type Culture Collection of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (GIBCO, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2.
3.3. RNA Interference Stable Infection
Sense and antisense oligonucleotides (Human Cbl-b sepcific sequence: 5′-GATCCCGTTTCCGGTTAAGTTGCACTCGTTCAAGAGACGAGTGCAACTTAACCGGAAATTTTTTCCAAA-3′ and 5′-AGCTTTTGGAAAAAATTTCCGGTTAAGTTGCACTCGTCTCTTGAACGAGTGCAACTTAACCGGAAAGG-3′ for Cbl-b; Non-silencing control: 5′-GATCCCGTTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTTTGATATCCGACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAATTTTTTCCAAA-3′ and 5′-AGCTTTTGGAAAAAATTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGTCGGATATCZAACGTGACACGTTCGGAGAACGG-3′) were phosphorylated with T4 kinase (Takara, Tokyo, Japan), annealed, and ligated into BamHI/HindIII-cleaved pRNA-U6.1/Neo vector (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ, USA). shRNA-expressing plasmids were transfected into MGC803 cells using the Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). After 48 h, the medium was supplemented with 0.6 mg/mL G418 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for selection of stable transfectants (for 10 days) followed by serial passage in the same medium.
3.4. MTT Assay
The effects of various agents on cell proliferation were measured using the MTT assay. Cells were seeded at 1 × 104/well in 96-well plates and incubated overnight; various concentrations of test agents were then added and incubation continued for 48 h. Thereafter, 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL) was added to each well and the cells incubated for a further 4 h at 37 °C. After removal of the culture medium, cells were lysed in 200 μL of DMSO and the optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Change in percentage viability was calculated using the formula: OD of the experimental sample/OD of the control group × 100%.
3.5. Flow Cytometry Analysis
The cells were seeded at 3 × 105 cells/well in six-well plates for 24 h and further cultured in the presence or absence of 5-FU for the indicated time. Cells were collected and washed twice with PBS and fixed in ice-cold 70% ethanol for 12 h. The samples were then washed twice with PBS and incubated with 20 μg/mL RNase A and 10 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) at room temperature in dark for 30 min, and DNA content was determined by flow cytometry using a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using Modifit software (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). The apoptotic rate was determined on the basis of the “sub-G1” peak.
3.6. Measurement of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential
For determination of mitochondrial transmembrane potential (ΔΨm), cells were incubated with 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC6) in culture media at 37 °C for 15 min, then analyzed with a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
Cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and solubilized in 1% Triton lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA, 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA (ethylene diaminete traacetic acid), 100 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride, and 90 mU/mL aprotinin) on ice. For the preparation of total cell lysates, cells were washed as described earlier with pre-chilled PBS and lysed with 1% Triton lysis buffer, followed by addition of 3× sample buffer and heating at 100 °C for 5 min. Cell lysates were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Tanon Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and electrophoretically transferred to polyvinylidenedifluoride transfer membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% skim milk in Tris Buffered Saline with Tween 20 (10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20), the blots were probed with the indicated primary antibodies for 1 h at 4 °C, followed by the appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Finally, proteins were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (SuperSignal Western Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate; Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). The signals on blots were analyzed using the NIH Image J software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/).
3.8. Statistical Analysis
Where appropriate, differences were analyzed for statistical significance using Student’s t-test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results are expressed as means ± SD.
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been extensively used in the treatment of gastrointestinal, pancreatic, and breast cancers. Studies in human pancreatic carcinoma cells have revealed that 5-FU induces EGFR and Akt phosphorylation . As PI3K/Akt signaling pathway promotes survival, these findings have led to the suggestion of a role for induced EGFR/ERK/Akt pathway in reducing chemosensitivity [4,23–25]. The mechanisms of chemoresistance to 5-FU in gastric cancer are however less clear. Studies presented here support a role for Cbl-b E3 ubiquitin ligase in promoting chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU through a mechanism that involves Cbl-b-dependent limitation of ERK and Akt survival signaling downstream of EGFR.
Our studies demonstrated that 5-FU triggered dose-dependent cytotoxicity in three gastric cancer cell lines (SGC7901, MGC803, and BGC823), and induced apoptosis in a time-dependent manner. Western blot analyses indicated that after 5-FU treatment, the levels of phospho-EGFR and phospho-Akt elevated in a short time and finally decreased at 48 h. The levels of phospho-ERK transiently decreased and then elevated by 48 h in MGC803 cells, which implied that the EGFR/ERK/Akt signaling pathway may be involved in 5-FU activity in gastric cancer cells. Knockdown studies of Cbl-b directly showed that loss of Cbl-b led to chemoresistance to 5-FU, as well as enhanced activation of EGFR, ERK and Akt signaling. These results indicated that Cbl-b enhanced the chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells to 5-FU through the regulation of levels of active (phosphorylated) EGFR, ERK and Akt.
Our suggestion that Cbl-b functions together with EGFR/ERK/Akt pathway regulating the balance between chemosensitivity and chemoresistance to 5-FU is supported by findings in the literature. In related studies, we have shown that the chemotherapeutic agent, oxaliplatin, can sensitize gastric cancer cells to TRAIL by regulating components of the apototic/survival machinery such as caspase-3, caspase-8, Bax, and Bcl-2 protein expression . Cbl proteins are known to function as E3-ubiquitin ligases and restrict receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling, most notably EGFR [27–30]. While Cbl-b function has been predominantly studied in the context of hematopoietic cells, its ability to negatively regulate EGFR signaling has been well documented in model cell systems. For example, Ettenberg demonstrated that Cbl-b was phosphorylated and recruited to EGFR upon EGF stimulation, and was found to bind to the Grb2 adaptor protein. Furthermore, 32D/EGFR cells overexpressing Cbl-b showed markedly reduced proliferative response to EGF, and increased the number of cells undergoing apoptosis . Ahsan reported that Cbl-dependent EGFR degradation might contribute to sensitivity of head and neck cancer cells to cisplatin . Our previous results also showed that an involvement of Cbl-b in apoptosis induced by anthracyclines in gastric cancer cells . Together, these previous studies further support an involvement of Cbl-b and its potential regulation of EGFR signaling in determining chemosensitivity of gastric cancer cells. The knockdown studies of Cbl-b and biochemical analyses of EGFR signaling in the present study directly support this idea. Notably, while the role of Cbl proteins as physiological negative regulators of tyrosine kinases is now well-established, modulation of these ubiquitin ligases to regulate the balance between pro-survival and apoptotic signaling during anticancer therapy is an emerging area with substantial clinical implications. Thus, insights gained here should be helpful in the design of further studies to identify ways to enhance the effectiveness of chemotherapy by modulating Cbl protein-dependent degradation of tyrosine kinases.
We thank Hamid Band for editing the manuscript prior to submission. This study was supported by following grants: Chinese National Foundation of National Sciences grants (No. 81172369, No. 81172198); the Key Laboratory Programme of Education Department of Liaoning Province (LS2010169); and National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2013ZX09303002).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Cervantes, A.; Rosello, S.; Roda, D.; Rodriguez-Braun, E. The treatment of advanced gastric cancer: Current strategies and future perspectives. Ann. Oncol 2008, 19, v103–v107.
- Siegel, R.; Naishadham, D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin 2012, 62, 10–29.
- Longley, D.; Harkin, D.; Johnston, P. 5-Fluorouracil: Mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 330–338.
- Boeckx, C.; Baay, M.; Wouters, A.; Specenier, P.; Vermorken, J.B.; Peeters, M.; Lardon, F. Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Focus on potential molecular mechanisms of drug resistance. Oncologist 2013, 18, 850–864.
- Kim, J.W.; Kim, H.P.; Im, S.A.; Kang, S.; Hur, H.S.; Yoon, Y.K.; Oh, D.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, D.S.; Kim, T.Y.; et al. The growth inhibitory effect of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase, in gastric cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett 2008, 272, 296–306.
- Okabe, T.; Okamoto, I.; Tsukioka, S.; Uchida, J.; Iwasa, T.; Yoshida, T.; Hatashita, E.; Yamada, Y.; Satoh, T.; Tamura, K.; et al. Synergistic antitumor effect of S-1 and the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines: Role of gefitinib-induced down-regulation of thymidylate synthase. Mol. Cancer Ther 2008, 7, 599–606.
- Hsu, C.; Gao, M.; Chen, C.; Yeh, P.; Cheng, A. Inhibitors of epidermoid growth factor receptor suppress cell growth and enhance chemosensitivity of nasopharyngeal cancer cells in vitro. Oncology 2005, 68, 538–547.
- Nozawa, H.; Tadakuma, T.; Ono, T.; Sato, M.; Hiroi, S.; Masumoto, K.; Sato, Y. Small interfering RNA targeting epidermal growth factor receptor enhances chemosensitivity to cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and docetaxel in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 2006, 97, 1115–1124.
- Wu, X.; Deng, Y.; Wang, G.; Tao, K. Combining siRNAs at two different sites in the EGFR to suppress its expression, induce apoptosis, and enhance 5-fluorouracil sensitivity of colon cancer cells. J. Surg. Res 2007, 138, 56–63.
- Van Schaeybroeck, S.; Karaiskou-McCaul, A.; Kelly, D.; Longley, D.; Galligan, L.; van Cutsem, E.; Johnston, P. Epidermal growth factor receptor activity determines response of colorectal cancer cells to gefitinib alone and in combination with chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res 2005, 11, 7480–7489.
- Komoto, M.; Nakata, B.; Nishii, T.; Kawajiri, H.; Shinto, O.; Amano, R.; Yamada, N.; Yashiro, M.; Hirakawa, K. In vitro and in vivo evidence that a combination of lapatinib plus S-1 is a promising treatment for pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci 2010, 101, 468–473.
- Mohapatra, B.; Ahmad, G.; Nadeau, S.; Zutshi, N.; An, W.; Scheffe, S.; Dong, L.; Feng, D.; Goetz, B.; Arya, P.; et al. Protein tyrosine kinase regulation by ubiquitination: Critical roles of Cbl-family ubiquitin ligases. BBA Mol. Cell Res 2013, 1833, 122–139.
- Komander, D. The emerging complexity of protein ubiquitination. Biochem. Soc. Trans 2009, 37, 937–953.
- Dikic, I.; Wakatsuki, S.; Walters, K. Ubiquitin-binding domains—From structures to functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2009, 10, 659–671.
- Duan, L.; Reddi, A.L.; Ghosh, A.; Dimri, M.; Band, H. The Cbl family and other ubiquitin ligases: Destructive forces in control of antigen receptor signaling. Immunity 2004, 21, 7–17.
- Fang, D.; Wang, H.; Fang, N.; Altman, Y.; Elly, C.; Liu, Y. Cbl-b, a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, targets phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase for ubiquitination in T cells. J. Biol. Chem 2001, 276, 4872–4878.
- Fang, D.; Liu, Y.C. Proteolysis-independent regulation of PI3K by Cbl-b-mediated ubiquitination in T cells. Nat. Immunol 2001, 2, 870–875.
- Zhang, R.; Zhang, N.; Mueller, D.L. Casitas B-lineage lymphoma b inhibits antigen recognition and slows cell cycle progression at late times during CD4+ T cell clonal expansion. J. Immunol 2008, 181, 5331–5339.
- Qu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Xu, Y.; Xu, L.; Hou, K.; Sada, K.; Liu, Y. Ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b sensitizes leukemia and gastric cancer cells to anthracyclines by activating the mitochondrial pathway and modulating Akt and ERK survival signals. FEBS Lett 2009, 583, 2255–2262.
- Qu, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Hou, K.; Liu, Y. Cbl-b promotes chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in rat basophilic leukemia cells by suppressing PI3K/Akt activation and enhancing MEK/ERK activation. Mol. Cell. Biochem 2010, 340, 107–114.
- Li, Y.; Qu, X.; Qu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Teng, Y.; Hu, X.; Hou, K.; Liu, Y. Arsenic trioxide induces apoptosis and G2/M phase arrest by inducing Cbl to inhibit PI3K/Akt signaling and thereby regulate p53 activation. Cancer Lett 2009, 284, 208–215.
- Ischenko, I.; Camaj, P.; Seeliger, H.; Kleespies, A.; Guba, M.; de Toni, E.N.; Schwarz, B.; Graeb, C.; Eichhorn, M.E.; Jauch, K.W.; et al. Inhibition of Src tyrosine kinase reverts chemoresistance toward 5-fluorouracil in human pancreatic carcinoma cells: An involvement of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Oncogene 2008, 27, 7212–7222.
- Pu, Y.; Hsieh, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, G.; Huang, C.; Lin, C.; Guan, J.; Lin, S.; Hour, T. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (PD168393) potentiates cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel against androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. Biochem. Pharmacol 2006, 71, 751–760.
- Bu, X.; Jia, F.; Wang, W.; Guo, X.; Wu, M.; Wei, L. Coupled down-regulation of mTOR and telomerase activity during fluorouracil-induced apoptosis of hepatocarcinoma cells. BMC Cancer 2007, 7, 208.
- Qin, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Feng, Y.; Weng, G.X.; Li, M.Z.; Kong, Q.L.; Qian, C.N.; Zeng, Y.X.; Zeng, M.S.; et al. Downregulation of BMI-1 enhances 5-fluorouracil-induced apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 2008, 371, 531–535.
- Xu, L.; Qu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, X.; Yang, X.; Hou, K.; Teng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Sada, K.; Liu, Y. Oxaliplatin enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in gastric cancer cells by CBL-regulated death receptor redistribution in lipid rafts. FEBS Lett 2009, 583, 943–948.
- Wang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Bergmann, A. Regulation of EGFR and Notch signaling by distinct isoforms of D-cbl during Drosophila development. Dev. Biol 2010, 342, 1–10.
- Tan, Y.; Krishnaswamy, S.; Nandi, S.; Kanteti, R.; Vora, S.; Onel, K.; Hasina, R.; Lo, F.; El-Hashani, E.; Cervantes, G.; et al. CBL is frequently altered in lung cancers: Its relationship to mutations in MET and EGFR tyrosine kinases. PLoS One 2010, 5, e8972.
- Vivanco, I.; Rohle, D.; Versele, M.; Iwanami, A.; Kuga, D.; Oldrini, B.; Tanaka, K.; Dang, J.; Kubek, S.; Palaskas, N.; et al. The phosphatase and tensin homolog regulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor response by targeting EGFR for degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 6459–6464.
- Feng, Y.; Tsao, C.; Wu, C.; Chang, J.; Lu, P.; Yeh, K.; Shieh, G.; Shiau, A.; Lee, J. Sprouty2 protein enhances the response to gefitinib through epidermal growth factor receptor in colon cancer cells. Cancer Sci 2010, 101, 2033–2038.
- Ettenberg, S.; Keane, M.; Nau, M.; Frankel, M.; Wang, L.; Pierce, J.; Lipkowitz, S. cbl-b inhibits epidermal growth factor receptor signaling. Oncogene 1999, 18, 1855–1866.
- Ahsan, A.; Hiniker, S.; Ramanand, S.; Nyati, S.; Hegde, A.; Helman, A.; Menawat, R.; Bhojani, M.; Lawrence, T.; Nyati, M. Role of epidermal growth factor receptor degradation in cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in head and neck cancer. Cancer Res 2010, 70, 2862–2869.
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).