- freely available
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(9), 11497-11519; doi:10.3390/ijms130911497
Published: 12 September 2012
Abstract: Powdery mildew (PM), caused by fungus Erysiphe necator, is one of the most devastating diseases of grapevine. To better understand grapevine-PM interaction and provide candidate resources for grapevine breeding, a suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) cDNA library was constructed from E. necator-infected leaves of a resistant Chinese wild Vitis quinquangularis clone “Shang-24”. A total of 492 high quality expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were obtained and assembled into 266 unigenes. Gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated that 188 unigenes could be assigned with at least one GO term in the biological process category, and 176 in the molecular function category. Sequence analysis showed that a large number of these genes were homologous to those involved in defense responses. Genes involved in metabolism, photosynthesis, transport and signal transduction were also enriched in the library. Expression analysis of 13 selected genes by qRT-PCR revealed that most were induced more quickly and intensely in the resistant material “Shang-24” than in the sensitive V. pseudoreticulata clone “Hunan-1” by E. necator infection. The ESTs reported here provide new clues to understand the disease-resistance mechanism in Chinese wild grapevine species and may enable us to investigate E. necator-responsive genes involved in PM resistance in grapevine germplasm.
Grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) is the most widely-grown fruit crop worldwide and used for wine, table grape, and dry fruit production. Powdery mildew (PM) caused by Erysiphe necator (Schw.) Burr., is one of the major fungal diseases in grapes, resulting in huge losses of berry quality and grape production. Due to the high cost and toxicity associated with fungicide application, developing resistant cultivars using wild species could be an efficient, economical, and environmentally friendly strategy to reduce the threat of the disease. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of PM resistance, identifying and functionally characterizing key genes in the resistant germplasm may provide candidate genes and valuable information on transgenic engineering for improving plant resistance to PM and withstanding harsh conditions.
Several recent studies have been carried out to investigate the biology of the infection process of grapevine by E. necator and to characterize defense reactions in Muscadinia rotundifolia [1–3], North American grapevine species  and European group grapevines [4,5]. Resistance to PM in M. rotundifolia could also be traced back to Run1, a single dominant locus that contains two families of resistance gene analogs [2,3]. The constitutive expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes, such as PR-2 and PR-3 in disease-resistant North American grapevine species , may represent one type of QTL-mediated cumulative effect. Fung et al.  reported that only three transcripts in V. aestivalis and 625 in V. vinifera were identified to be involved in PM-responsive process. Fekete et al.  identified 25 disease-response genes in V. vinifera Cabernet Sauvignon and found that they were up-regulated specifically in response to E. necator. These previous studies provide valuable information on the interaction between PM and European and North American grapevines. However, little is known about the transcriptional and differential gene expression patterns upon PM-inoculation of wild grapevine species originating from China.
China is one of the major centers of origin of Vitis species . Among the nearly 70 known species in Vitis, more than 27 have their origins from China [6,7]. These wild Vitis species have been systematically evaluated for PM resistance by natural and artificial identification in field conditions when disease symptoms were fully developed . Among them, Chinese wild V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” has been reported to be highly resistant to E. necator . Discovery of a highly PM-resistant trait in Chinese wild Vitis species provides a valuable resource and germplasm for genetic improvement and molecular analysis of the PM resistance mechanism.
Subtractive suppression hybridization (SSH) is an effective method that can be used to maximize the identification of genes involved in host responses to pathogen infection and disease development. This technique has been successfully used to isolate functional genes that are responsive to pathogen infection in plants [8–10]. In this study, to better understand the molecular basis of the high resistance to PM by Chinese wild V. quinquangularis, we constructed an SSH cDNA library to determine the differential expression of PM-responsive genes.
2.1. E. necator Developmental Stages
To investigate the developmental time-course of the pathogen in Chinese wild V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” and V. pseudoreticulata clone “Hunan-1”, we conducted a microscopy study of conidiospore germination and hyphal development during a 5-day time period. Microscopic images of 24, 48 and 120 hpi are presented in Figure 1.
Histological observations revealed that conidial germination, germ tube formation, and development of the appressorium occurred on leaves of both grapevine clones (Figure 1). At 24 hpi, conidiospores produced germ tube and appressoria on both V. quinquangularis and V. pseudoreticulata leaves. In V. quinquangularis leaves, most epidermal cells invaded by the conidiospores led to a hypersensitive response and the attachment by the conidiospores induced H2O2 accumulation, as indicated by brown staining due to DAB polymerization (Figure 1). At this stage, the staining was obvious but faint and it appeared to be in the wall of mesophyll cells where they made contact with the attacked epidermal cells. Mesophyll that had no contact with the attacked epidermal cells did not show any brown staining, and the staining was intense on reaching 120 hpi in V. quinquangularis leaves. In contrast, in V. pseudoreticulata leaves during the early phase of infection, no DAB staining appeared, and even at 120 hpi only very weak DAB staining was detected in mesophyll cells at few infection sites. The further infection led to the formation of colonies with dense secondary hyphae on V. pseudoreticulata leaves, but only small colonies with sparse hyphae on V. quinquangularis leaves at 120 hpi (Figure 1). On the basis that the first infection occurred within 24 hpi in Chinese wild V. quinquangularis “Shang-24” (Figure 1), in the present study we chose leaves at 12 to 120 hpi for the SSH library construction.
2.2. SSH Library Construction, EST Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation
To identify genes that are potentially involved in V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” resistance to E. necator, an SSH library was constructed with mock-inoculated “Shang-24” leaves as the driver and E. necator-inoculated leaves as the tester. A total of 605 clones from the SSH library were selected and PCR analysis of white E. coli colonies containing cDNA inserts in the pGEM-T Easy vector showed that the size of the cDNA inserts ranged from 150 to 1000 bp. This confirmed the quality of the subtracted cDNA library. A total of 526 clones were identified to contain inserts larger than 200 bp, and were selected for sequencing. After removing low quality sequences and sequences of bacterial origin, 492 high quality ESTs ranging between 200 and 1000 bp were obtained. These ESTs were further assembled into 266 unigenes, among which 101 were contigs and 165 were singletons (Table S1). The number of EST members in unigenes varied from one to 20 (Figure 2), with the majority of unigenes present in low copy numbers.
The “Shang-24” unigenes were further analyzed by searching against the NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) nr database using the BLASTX program. A total of 205 (77.1%) unigenes including 77 contigs and 128 singletons showed significant similarities to known functional gene sequences in the database, 25 had matches against genes of unknown function or hypothetic proteins. The remaining 36 sequences (15 contigs and 21 singletons) did not match to any known gene sequences in the database.
The unigenes from E. necator-inoculated grapevine leaves were further assigned gene ontology (GO) terms. Based on the GO annotations, unigenes were classified into high-level plant specific GO slims within the two ontology categories, namely, molecular function and biological process. A total of 176 unigenes were assigned to 22 GO slims within the molecular function category and 188 unigenes to 41 GO slims within the biological process category (Figure 3). Within the molecular function category, catalytic activity and binding were the most abundant GO slims (Figure 3A). Response to stress was the most abundant GO slim within the biological process category, which contained responses to stress, abiotic stimulus, and chemical stimulus, which is consistent with the fact that the unigenes were derived from tissues subjected to E. necator inoculation in Chinese wild V. quinquangularis (Figure 3B).
2.3. PM Resistance-Related Genes
Although a large amount of E. necator-induced sequence information was generated from Chinese wild V. quinquangularis in this study, only 87 unigenes that were thought to be more relevant to PM resistance because of their defense-related roles and the higher number of those genes were sorted into different categories, based on their putative functions (Table 1). The largest category, consisting of 22 (8.3%) unigenes, was predicted to encode resistance and stress-related proteins, such as PR protein, senescence-associated protein, glutathione S-transferase 3, F-box family protein, chitinase, proline-rich protein, and catalase. Nineteen (7.1%) unigenes were related to metabolism, 15 (5.6%) encoding proteins and enzymes putatively involved in photosynthesis and energy, the majority of which encoded ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase, 7 (2.6%) unigenes were related to protein synthesis and fate, and genes involved in signal transduction, transport, and transcription accounted for 3.0%, 4.5%, and 1.5%, respectively.
2.4. Expression Analysis of E. necator-Responsive Genes by qRT-PCR
To further confirm the expression patterns of identified genes during the interaction between grapevine and E. necator at different time points, qRT-PCR was performed with 11 genes represented by one EST and two genes by two or more ESTs on E. necator- and mock-inoculated samples at eight time points (0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hpi). These 13 genes in different functional groups were selected for the qRT-PCR analysis because of defense-related roles of their homologs in hypersensitivity, ubiquitin/proteasome pathway and phenylpropanoid synthesis reported previously, and because of their novel sequences. Nine of them corresponded to three functional categories: metabolism (3 genes), protein synthesis and fate (3 genes) and response to defense (3 genes) (Table 1), and four had no match to any sequences in the GenBank nr database. Distinct expression patterns of these genes were observed in resistant and susceptible grapevines in response to E. necator and most of the selected genes were strongly elevated by E. necator only in the resistant material “Shang-24”, while not in the susceptible material “Hunan-1” (Figure 4).
Three genes involved in defense (UN073, UN116, and UN174), which encode a thaumatin-like protein, a senescence-associated protein, and a class IV chitinase, respectively, shared similar expression patterns in the resistant plant. They did not start increasing until 12 hpi, and all of them reached their maximum expression levels at 24 hpi, then decreased gradually from 48 to 120 hpi; while in the susceptible material, the expression levels of these three genes were consistently close to the control levels throughout the entire time course (Figure 4A).
Three genes in the protein synthesis and fate group (UN134, UN135, and UN203), coding for a coronatine insensitive 1 (COI1), an F-box family protein, and a jasmonate ZIM-domain protein, respectively, were activated strongly by E. necator from 6 to 72 hpi in the resistant material “Shang-24”, while in “Hunan-1”, their transcripts consistently remained at control levels throughout the entire time course (Figure 4B).
Three genes in the category of metabolism (UN044, UN182, and UN260) showed homology to S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, chalcone-flavanone isomerase, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, respectively (Table 1). They all sharply increased as early as at 6 hpi in “Shang-24” and reached the maximal levels at 48 hpi, whereas their expression did not change significantly in “Hunan-1” upon E. necator-inoculation (Figure 4C).
The expression pattern of four novel genes that had no hits in the database at different time points post inoculation of E. necator is shown in Figure 4D. Two genes (UN113 and UN235) were induced as early as 6 hpi in “Shang-24”, but remained at control levels (UN113) or did not increase until 24 hpi (UN235) in “Hunan-1”. Another gene (UN168) increased at 6 hpi and reached the maximum expression level at 24 hpi in “Shang-24” in response to E. necator, while in “Hunan-1”, the reaction was delayed until 72 hpi. Gene UN103 showed a completely different expression pattern with other genes in our experiment: induced at 6 hpi and reached its maximum expression level at 12 hpi in “Hunan-1” though also slightly increased in “Shang-24” (Figure 4D).
3.1. Analysis of E. Necator Developmental Stages
Powdery mildew fungus enters the epidermal cells of the leaf via conidiospores and the formation of a primary hypha is an indication of successful cell penetration and the establishment of a compatible interaction. Conidiospores produced germ tube and appressoria on both V. quinquangularis and V. pseudoreticulata leaves at 24 hpi, and a similar finding was reported in a previous study . Recently, a microscopy study of the infection process of E. necator showed that appressorium formation, host cell penetration, and primary hypha formation took place during the period from 12 to 48 hpi in the susceptible V. vinifera Cabernet Sauvignon .
Restriction of E. necator growth in V. quinquangularis is a post-infection phenomenon that begins when the first haustoria enters mesophyll cells, resulting in the necrosis of guard cells, the accumulation of peroxidases, and in some cases a hypersensitive reaction depending on environmental conditions [11,12]. This correlates well with the specific induction of genes related to hypersensitivity and phenylpropanoid synthesis (Figure 4). Pathogen spread was severely impaired between 48 and 120 hpi in V. quinquangularis, suggesting that the resistance mechanism is already in effect before this time point, consistent with the strong transcriptional reprogramming observed before 48 hpi (Figure 4).
3.2. Construction of an SSH Library after E. Necator Inoculation
As a valuable tool in functional genomics, SSH has been applied to maximize the identification of genes involved in host responses to pathogen infection and disease development. In this study, a PCR-based cDNA subtractive strategy was used to isolate genes related to PM-resistance from a PM-resistant clone of Chinese wild V. quinquangularis. Approximately 526 clones were sequenced and 492 ESTs were submitted to GenBank. These ESTs were assembled into 266 unigenes and then classified into functional categories of defense, transcription, signal transduction and transport (Table 1). ESTs falling into categories of transcription, signal transduction and transport may be due to a rapid response of these genes following E. necator-inoculation or as a result of constitutive expression of these genes in anticipation of pathogen stress. Among them, 205 (77.1%) unigenes appeared to share significant homologies with genes induced by pathogen attack in V. vinifera, A. thaliana, N. tabacum and O. sativa, etc.
Since SSH was only used to obtain global analysis of gene expression, but not to provide quantitative expression data, real-time qRT-PCR was used to determine the expression levels of some particular genes upon pathogen infection. Expression analysis of 13 selected genes by qRT-PCR revealed that 12 of them were induced more quickly and intensely in the resistant material “Shang-24” than in the susceptible material “Hunan-1” by E. necator infection (Figure 4). This transcriptome response in resistant material is consistent with recent findings in the wheat-Puccinia striiformis interaction  and also with the results that the strong and rapid transcriptional reprogramming involves the induction of defense-related genes in a resistant grapevine (V. riparia) upon Plasmopara viticola infection, many of which are also induced, albeit to a lesser extent, in a susceptible grapevine (V. vinifera) . Polesani et al.  also reported that the most prevalent functional categories among the modulated transcripts were general metabolism and signal transduction in the resistant grapevine (V. riparia). This was very different to our result that the largest category consisting of genes which was predicted to encode resistance and stress-related proteins (Table 1). A possible explanation is that disease resistance involves not only the activation of resistance genes, but also the timing of expression of resistance genes and the associated signal transduction pathways. They only analyzed the early transcriptional changes associated with P. viticola infection at 12 and 24 hpi, while we constructed the library with all-stages infection samples of “Shang-24” at the 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hpi time points.
It is noteworthy that our finding was quite different from that observed in the grapevine-PM interaction in previous studies [1,4] and from the result in cauliflower that the expression induction of the defense-related genes, such as plant defensin gene PDF1.2, lipid transfer protein, and thioredoxin, was quicker and more intense in the susceptible line in response to pathogen, while in resistant line the reaction was delayed and limited . A possible explanation is that resistance in V. quinquangularis involves the specific modulation of numerous transcripts that interacted with PM, such as transcripts encoding components of signal transduction cascades, hypersensitive reaction markers and genes involved in jasmonate biosynthesis (Figure 4B), while the limited transcriptional modulation in V. pseudoreticulata represents a weak attempted defense response rather than the activation of compatibility-specific pathways observed in V. vinifera and the susceptible cauliflower [1,4,14].
3.3. Defense-Related Genes
A large number of differentially-expressed cDNAs isolated from the SSH library were classified into several categories and they were involved in a number of physiological and molecular processes, including defense, transcription, signal transduction and transport (Table 1). The largest gene functional category, defense (8.3%), detected in this study was similar to the previous study which categorized disease/defense, accounting for 24% in grapevine infected by P. viticola . Moreover, defense-related genes were observed to overlap between this study and the previous study  in the susceptible grapevine cultivar Chasselas in response to P. viticola, including pathogenesis-related protein, chitinase, lipid transfer protein (LTP), and thaumatin-like protein (TLP) (Table 1). This indicated that there might be common genes in grapevines in response to fungal and oomycete diseases, and putative grapevine defense genes induced in susceptible plants were also induced in resistant plants.
Representatives of this category are genes encoding PR proteins, such as chitinase, TLP, PR-10, and LTP. PR proteins were proven to be associated with plant resistance to various pathogens and abiotic stresses and classified into 17 families [15,16]. In this study, a chitinase gene (UN174) was identified in the SSH library. Chitinases, which belong to the PR-3 family and are an indicator of the systemic acquired resistance (SAR) response, can provide defense against fungal pathogens by degrading fungal chitin following initial penetration of the pathogen into the intercellular space. It has been reported that released chitin might trigger a more generalized defense response in plant tissues , therefore the consistently higher expression of the chitinase gene in both resistant and susceptible grapevines in our study suggested that this gene might be involved in generalized defense responses (Figure 4A).
UN073, a class 5 PR protein (PR-5), namely thaumatin-like protein (TLP), was strongly induced (about 60-fold) in resistant grapevine “Shang-24” after E. necator inoculation (Figure 4A). PR-5 proteins have been proven to create trans-membrane pores and exhibit antifungal activities in vitro by blocking spore germination and germ tube growth of E. necator, Phomopsis viticola and Botrytis cinerea . Moreover, the transgenic expression of TLPs enhanced resistance to several fungal pathogens by inhibiting mycelial growth [19–21].
UN033 presented homology to pathogenesis-related protein 10, which has been identified in many plants. A strong induction of PR-10 was observed in many plants, such as in susceptible grapevine cv. Riesling with P. viticola , in compatible grapevine cv. Chasselas with P. viticola  and in rice with Magnaporthe grisea . Taking these results together, the induction of PR-10 may play an important role in plant defense against pathogens.
Another type of homologs involved in defense was also identified in this study, namely lipid transfer proteins (UN096, UN170, UN205, and UN226). LTPs are members of class 14 PR protein (PR-14) that are involved in plant defense responses by facilitating lipid transportation to cell walls for the formation of the cuticle and biosynthesis of surface wax. Plant LTPs increase cutin layer thickness to protect leaf cells from fungus damage, retard growth of fungal pathogens and lead to cell death [14,24]. Legay et al.  found an interesting feature that the LTP structure showed similarity with elicitin: a small lipid-binding protein that is secreted by the phytopathogenic oomycetes Phytophthora and Pythium, which triggers the hypersensitive response (HR) and SAR in tobacco.
3.4. Transport-Related Genes
Twelve transport-related genes were identified in the present study (Table 1), including ABC transporters, responsible for a large number of transport processes. In plants, it has been revealed that toxins, drugs, glutathione conjugates, peptides and secondary metabolites are transported across the membrane via ABC transporters . It was reported that the expression of an Arabidopsis ABC transporter (AtPDR8) gene was induced by pathogen infection and the gene was a key factor controlling the extent of cell death in the defense response, suggesting that ABC transporters transport some substances, which are closely related to plant response to pathogens . In this SSH library, three genes encoding ABC transporters were identified (Table 1); in light of recent evidence, these genes may be involved in transportation of some substances produced by grapevine or the PM fungus during the infection process.
3.5. Ubiquitin/26S Proteasome Pathway
In addition to the direct genes involved in defense, transport, and signal transduction, there were also some other types of genes that potentially relate to the defense response (Table 1), most of which encoded proteins involved in the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. It appears that ubiquitin-dependent breakdown is emerging as a common regulatory mechanism that not only controls a range of cellular processes in plants, but also plays an important role in plant disease resistance . Recently, JAZ proteins were identified as negative regulators of transcription factors that control the expression of JA-responsive genes. Upon perception of bioactive JA derivatives by the F-box protein, coronatine insensitive 1 (COI1), JAZ proteins were degraded via the conSCF/ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, thereby relieving the restrain on JA-responsive genes . COI1, a Leu-rich repeat/F-box protein, determines the substrate specificity of the SCF-type E3 ubiquitin-ligase SCFCOI1, while F-box proteins imparted specificity to the SCF complex through recognizing a specific substrate (typically a regulatory protein), which was then ubiquitinated and subsequently degraded by the 26S proteasome . It is reported that JAZ transcripts increase in response to mechanical wounding and JAZ genes are negatively regulated by one or more labile proteins whose turnover is dependent on COI1 activity . Moreover, it was found that transgenic expression of JAZ1Δ3A or other C-terminally truncated JAZs may provide a useful approach to elucidate specific COI1-dependent processes that confer plant protection to insect herbivores and other forms of environmental stress . In the current study, three genes coding for COI1, F-box family protein, and JAZ protein, respectively, were differentially regulated in the resistant grapevine upon infection by E. necator, compared with the susceptible grapevine (Figure 4B), suggesting that these genes may interact with other genes through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway and contribute to the defense response to E. necator.
3.6. Photosynthesis and Energy-Related Genes
Approximately 5.6% of the PM-resistance-related genes obtained from the library were identified with a photosynthesis and energy function (Table 1). It is certain that a wide range of physiological and biological changes in a resistant host plant would take place after pathogen inoculation to directly alter growth conditions or represent changes activated in response to pathogen infection . In the current study, genes coding for proteins and enzymes that are related to photosynthetic oxygen evolution (e.g., chlorophyll a/b-binding protein, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase, and photosystem components) as reported by Scharte et al. , have been effectively enriched in the PM responsive library, suggesting that these genes may also play a role in grapevine resistance against E. necator.
3.7. Metabolism-Associated Genes
It is not surprising that exposure of plants to pathogen infection induces expression of genes encoding proteins involved in metabolic pathways to attenuate the damage of biotic stresses . It has been reported that one of the largest groups of genes activated by pathogen infection comprise genes involved in energy and primary metabolism . In this study, about 21.8% of the identified genes are associated with metabolism, some of which were predicted to encode S-adenosylmethionine synthetase (SAMS, UN044), chalcone-flavanone isomerase (CHI, UN182) and phenylalanin ammonia-lyase (PAL, UN260). As a key enzyme of the methionine biosynthesis pathway, SAMS plays an important role in the production of S-adenosylmethionine, which is the precursor of ethylene and polyamine biosynthesis pathways. Ethylene has been reported to be involved in a subset of defense responses, and polyamine is considered to pre-induce tolerance of tobacco to different kinds of pathogens [32,33]. In grapevine, accumulation of phytoalexins is the most frequently observed defense reaction upon fungal infection . The grapevine phytoalexins, as flavonoid-type phytoalexins, are formed via the phenylpropanoid pathway, which provides precursors for the biosynthesis of salicylic acid, lignin, and hydroxycinnamic acid amide. Enzymes such as PAL and CHI are crucial to phenylpropanoid metabolism. Several studies indicate that these two enzymes are involved in disease resistance [35,36]. In this study, the expression patterns of three genes encoding SAMS, PAL, and CHI indicate that they might contribute to PM-resistance of grapevine (Figure 4C).
3.8. Novel Genes
In our SSH library, 36 (13.5%) unigenes had no hits in the nr protein database; however they showed high homologies to certain DNA sequences in the EST database, most of which were from V. vinifera. Four of them were selected for qRT-PCR analysis and the result suggested that three of them showed the similar expression patterns with genes had defense-related roles (Figure 4D). More interestingly, one gene (UN103) was induced more quickly and intensely in the susceptible material “Hunan-1” compared to the resistant material “Shang-24”. The functions of these unigenes in the complex networks of E. necator- inoculation processes and whether they contribute to the defense response to E. necator in grapevine still await further functional investigation.
In general, more than 200 unigenes have been identified by sequencing the large number of ESTs (Acc. No. JK266423 to JK266914) originating from the grapevine-PM SSH cDNA library obtained in the study, but only 87 more relevant genes were sorted out into different functional categories, based on their putative roles in defense. It is likely that those genes that showed high levels of expression in grapevine “Shang-24” might have relevance, since Chinese wild Vitis is a stress-adapted species. Several candidate resistance genes were obtained from resistant material that could be exploited in future biotechnological approaches to increase disease resistance in susceptible grapevine species. The presumed defensive functions of these differentially expressed genes in the complex networks of E. necator-resistant processes in grapevine plants await further investigation. Grape resistance to PM is not a single genetic trait, but a complex and systematic network that includes physiological and biochemical processes. By employing qRT-PCR, we have detailed molecular events at the transcriptome level that allowed us to begin unraveling the grapevine defense network in response to E. necator infection. Our results suggest that Chinese wild Vitis can effectively reprogram its complex signaling networks on a global scale, thus activating expression of multiple genes to mitigate pathogen-induced cellular damage and interfere with pathogen infection processes. Further characterization and functional analysis of these genes will enhance our understanding of the resistance mechanisms of grapevine plants to E. necator infection.
4. Experimental Section
4.1. Plant Material and Inoculation
Chinese wild V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” (PM-resistant), V. pseudoreticulata clone “Hunan-1” (PM-susceptible) and V. adstricta Hance clone “Taishan-2” (PM-susceptible) were obtained from the Grape Repository (34°20′N, 108°24′E) of Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China. The inoculation of E. necator, collected from leaves of the field-grown V. adstricta, was performed as previously described [4,7]. The inoculated leaves were immediately covered with plastic bags for one night to ensure high humidity. A mock inoculation was made with sterile water at the same time points. Plants were incubated in the greenhouse, with temperatures ranging from 25 to 30 °C and without supplemental lighting. Both treated and mock-inoculated leaves were harvested at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 h post inoculation (hpi), respectively, frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C until use. The experiment was performed with two biological replicates.
4.2. Microscopic Observations
E. necator-inoculated grapevine leaves of V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” and V. pseudoreticulata clone “Hunan-1” were harvested at 24, 48 and 120 hpi. The in vivo detection of H2O2 during the powdery mildew interaction was carried out using DAB as described in Vanacker et al.  Three inoculated leaves of each line were fixed at a 24 h interval from 24 to 120 hpi and examined under light microscopy for assessment of epidermal host cell responses. Leaves were fixed and prepared for microscopy by a procedure that avoids displacement of the fungus. For fixation, 3 cm segments cut from the center of inoculated leaves were laid adaxial surface up on filter paper moistened with an ethanol:glacial acetic acid mixture (3:1, v/v) for 24 to 48 h until the chlorophyll was removed. After bleaching, they were transferred to water soaked filter paper for at least 4 h to relax leaf tissue and finally transferred to papers soaked with lacto-glycerol (1:1:1, lactic acid:glycerol:water, v/v) for at least 24 h. Segments were stored on lacto-glycerol .
For microscopy, the bleached leaf segment was mounted on a microscope slide without a coverslip and observed using a microscope (BX51, Olympus, Tokyo) with a “no coverslip” 100× objective and 20× objective lens. For micrographs, a drop of aniline blue (0.1% [v/v] in lacto glycerol) was pipetted onto leaf surfaces immediately before they were photographed.
4.3. RNA Extraction and SSH Library Construction
For SSH library construction, total RNA of E. necator- and mock-inoculated leaves was extracted using the protocol described by Zhang et al.  with minor modifications in DNase digestion and purification. One microgram of RNA was run on a 1% agarose gel to check the quality. Equimolar amounts of total RNA samples from two corresponding biological replicates and from each time point were combined. The mRNA was isolated from the total RNA, using mRNA purification Kit (Clontech, USA). Two micrograms of high quality mRNA were used for the construction of the library. The purified mRNAs isolated from mock-inoculated grapevine leaves were mixed as the driver, whereas the mRNAs isolated from E. necator-inoculated leaves were used as the tester. The SSH cDNA library was constructed using PCR-select cDNA Subtraction Kit (Clontech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Differentially expressed cDNA fragments digested with RsaI after a two-round PCR selection were cloned into the pGEM-T easy Vector (Promega, WI, USA) and transformed into E. coli DH5α (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The clones were cultured overnight on an LB media plate containing ampicillin and X-Gal/IPTG at 37 °C.
4.4. Amplification of cDNA Inserts
cDNA inserts from white colonies were PCR-amplified using SP6 and T7 primers. The PCR reactions contained a total volume of 25 μL, including 16 μL sterile water, 2.5 μL 10× buffer, 1.0 μL of each primer (10 μM each), 0.5 μL dNTP mix (2.5 μM each), 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China) and 1 μL of bacterial culture. The PCR was performed as follows: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.0% agarose gels to confirm the amplification. A subset of positive clones whose PCR products were longer than 200 bp were selected for preparation of plasmid DNA using the Plasmid DNA extraction kit from U-gene (Anhui, China).
4.5. Sequencing and Data Analysis
The selected positive clones were sequenced with the universal M13 sequencing primer. The raw chromatogram files were base-called with Phred . Vector, adaptor and low-quality bases (a 20-bp window with an average error rate >0.01) were trimmed from the raw EST sequences using LUCY . The resulting ESTs were searched against the GenBank nr database and EST sequences of bacterial origin were identified and excluded. The resulting high quality grape ESTs have been deposited in GenBank dbEST database under accession numbers JK266423 to JK266914.
The ESTs were assembled into unigenes using iAssembler  with minimum overlap of 40 bp and minimum percent identity of 97. The resulting grape unigene sequences were compared against GenBank non-redundant (nr) and UniProt  protein databases using the NCBI BLAST program with a cutoff e value of 1e-5. The unigene sequences were also compared to pfam domain database  using HMMER3 . Gene Ontology (GO) terms and plant-specific GO slim ontology  were assigned to each unigene, based on terms annotated to its corresponding homologs in the UniProt database and domains in pfam database.
4.6. Real Time qRT-PCR Analysis
For qRT-PCR, total RNA extracted from leaves of E. necator-inoculated “Shang-24” and “Hunan-1” plants at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hpi as well as from their corresponding mock-inoculated grapevines, was treated with DNase I to remove DNA contamination before cDNA synthesis. The cDNA was synthesized from 1.0 μg total RNA using 500 ng of random hexamers and the M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega). cDNAs, derived from inoculated healthy V. quinquangularis clone “Shang-24” leaves harvested at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hpi, were used as templates for qRT-PCR. Gene-specific primers for the 13 selected defense-related genes were designed using the Primer Premier 5.0 software. All the primers are listed in Table S2. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 νg of DNase-treated total RNA using PrimeScript™ RTase (TaKaRa Biotechnology).
qRT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicates using iCycler Detection system (BioRad Laboratories, Ltd). Grape Actin1 (GenBank accession no. AY680701) was used as the internal control and for data normalization. A 168 bp fragment of Actin1 gene was amplified with a pair of primers (F: 5′-GAT TCT GGT GAT GGT GTG AGT-3′, R: 5′-GAC AAT TTC CCG TTC AGC AGT-3′). Reactions were performed in a total volume of 20 μL containing 10.0 μL SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (TaKaRa Biotechnology), 1.0 μL of cDNA template (6× diluted cDNA from leaf samples), 0.8 μL of each primer (10 pmol·L−1), and 7.4 μL ddH2O with the following cycling parameters: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Dissociation curves were generated to ascertain only a single product that was produced in each case. Relative gene expression was determined from standard curves produced using serial cDNA dilutions.
The results obtained from the present study are the first to provide a global view of gene expression profiles in response to PM pathogen attack in a PM-resistant Chinese wild V. quinquangularis accession “Shang-24”. The EST data reported herein provides new insights into the grapevine-PM interaction and the candidate defense-related genes involved in the process. Analyzing gene expression patterns in response to pathogen infection provides a basis for their functional studies.
The authors thank Rudolf Eibach for a critical review of this manuscript and Robert Langan for proofreading. This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31071782, 30871701) Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-07-0702).
|CHI||chalcone-flavanone isomerase family protein|
|COI1||coronatine insensitive 1|
|EST||expressed sequence tag|
|hpi||hour post inoculation|
|JAZ||jasmonate ZIM-domain protein|
|LTP||lipid transfer protein|
|qRT-PCR||quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction|
|SAR||systemic acquired resistance|
|SSH||suppression subtractive hybridization|
- Fekete, C.; Fung, R.W.M.; Szabó, Z.; Qiu, W.; Chang, L.; Schachtman, D.P.; Kovács, L.G. Up-regulated transcripts in a compatible powdery mildew-grapevine interaction. Plant Physiol. Bioch 2009, 47, 732–738.
- Donald, T.; Pellerone, F.; Adam-Blondon, A.F.; Bouquet, A.; Thomas, M.; Dry, I. Identification of resistance gene analogs linked to a powdery mildew resistance locus in grapevine. Theor. Appl. Genet 2002, 104, 610–618.
- Barker, C.; Donald, T.; Pauquet, J.; Ratnaparkhe, M.; Bouquet, A.; Adam-Blondon, A.F.; Thomas, M.; Dry, I. Genetic and physical mapping of the grapevine powdery mildew resistance gene, Run1, using a bacterial artificial chromosome library. Theor. Appl. Genet 2005, 111, 370–377.
- Fung, R.W.M.; Gonzalo, M.; Fekete, C.; Kovacs, L.G.; He, Y.; Marsh, E.; McIntyre, L.M.; Schachtman, D.P.; Qiu, W. Powdery mildew induces defense-oriented reprogramming of the transcriptome in a susceptible but not in a resistant grapevine. Plant Physiol 2008, 146, 236–249.
- Winterhagen, P.; Howard, S.F.; Qiu, W.; Kovács, L.G. Transcriptional up-regulation of grapevine MLO genes in response to powdery mildew infection. Am. J. Enol. Vitic 2008, 59, 159–168.
- He, P.C.; Wang, Y.J.; Wang, G.Y. Study of the resistance disease in Chinese native wild Vitis L. species. Sci. Agric. Sin 1991, 24, 50–56.
- Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, P.; Chen, J.; Lamikanra, O.; Lu, J. Evaluation of foliar resistance to uncinula necator in Chinese wild vitis species. Vitis 1995, 34, 159–164.
- Legay, G.; Marouf, E.; Berger, D.; Neuhaus, J.M.; Mauch-Mani, B.; Slaughter, A. Identification of genes expressed during the compatible interaction of grapevine with Plasmopara viticola through suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH). Eur. J. Plant Pathol 2011, 129, 281–301.
- Norelli, J.L.; Farrell, R.E.; Bassett, C.L.; Baldo, A.M.; Lalli, D.A.; Aldwinckle, H.S.; Wisniewski, M.E. Rapid transcriptional response of apple to fire blight disease revealed by cDNA suppression subtractive hybridization analysis. Tree Genet. Genomes 2009, 5, 27–40.
- Qi, X.; Xu, Q.; Shen, L.; Alfandi, M.; Luo, J.; Chen, X. Identification of differentially expressed genes between powdery mildew resistant near-isogenic line and susceptible line of cucumber by suppression subtractive hybridization. Sci. Hortic 2010, 126, 27–32.
- Yu, X.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Qu, Z.; Han, Q.; Zhao, J.; Guo, J.; Huang, L. Wheat defense genes in fungal (Puccinia striiformis) infection. Funct. Integr. Genomics 2010, 10, 227–239.
- Vanacker, H.; Carver, T.L.W.; Foyer, C.H. Early H2O2 accumulation in mesophyll cells leads to induction of glutathione during the hyper-sensitive response in the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant Physiol 2000, 123, 1289–1300.
- Polesani, M.; Bortesi, L.; Ferrarini, A.; Zamboni, A.; Fasoli, M.; Zadra, C.; Lovato, A.; Pezzotti, M.; Delledonne, M.; Polverari, A. General and species-specific transcriptional responses to downy mildew infection in a susceptible (Vitis vinifera) and a resistant (V. riparia) grapevine species. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 117.
- Jiang, H.; Song, W.; Li, A.; Yang, X.; Sun, D. Identification of genes differentially expressed in cauliflower associated with resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Mol. Biol. Rep 2011, 38, 621–629.
- Van Loon, L.; Rep, M.; Pieterse, C. Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 2006, 44, 135–162.
- Sels, J.; Mathys, J.; de Coninck, B.; Cammue, B.; de Bolle, M.F.C. Plant pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins: A focus on PR peptides. Plant Physiol. Biochem 2008, 46, 941–950.
- De A Gerhardt, L.B.; Sachetto-Martins, G.; Contarini, M.G.; Sandroni, M.; de P Ferreira, R.; de Lima, V.M.; Cordeiro, M.C.; de Oliveira, D.E.; Margis-Pinheiro, M. Arabidopsis thaliana class IV chitinase is early induced during the interaction with Xanthomonas campestris. FEBS Lett 1997, 419, 69–75.
- Monteiro, S.; Barakat, M.; Piçarra-Pereira, M.A.; Teixeira, A.R.; Ferreira, R.B. Osmotin and thaumatin from grape: A putative general defense mechanism against pathogenic fungi. Phytopathology 2003, 93, 1505–1512.
- Punja, Z.K. Transgenic carrots expressing a thaumatin-like protein display enhanced resistance to several fungal pathogens. Can. J. Plant Pathol 2005, 27, 291–296.
- Ho, V.S.M.; Wong, J.H.; Ng, T. A thaumatin-like antifungal protein from the emperor banana. Peptides 2007, 28, 760–766.
- Kim, B.G.; Fukumoto, T.; Tatano, S.; Gomi, K.; Ohtani, K.; Tada, Y.; Akimitsu, K. Molecular cloning and characterization of a thaumatin-like protein-encoding cDNA from rough lemon. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol 2009, 74, 3–10.
- Kortekamp, A. Expression analysis of defence-related genes in grapevine leaves after inoculation with a host and a non-host pathogen. Plant Physiol. Biochem 2006, 44, 58–67.
- McGee, J.D.; Hamer, J.E.; Hodges, T.K. Characterization of a PR-10 pathogenesis-related gene family induced in rice during infection with Magnaporthe grisea. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact 2001, 14, 877–886.
- Vieira, F.A.; Carvalho, A.O.; Vitória, Â.P.; Retamal, C.A.; Gomes, V.M. Differential expression of defence-related proteins in Vigna unguiculata (L. Walp.) seedlings after infection with Fusarium oxysporum. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 440–447.
- Yazaki, K. ABC transporters involved in the transport of plant secondary metabolites. FEBS Lett 2006, 580, 1183–1191.
- Kobae, Y.; Sekino, T.; Yoshioka, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Martinoia, E.; Maeshima, M. Loss of AtPDR8, a plasma membrane ABC transporter of Arabidopsis thaliana, causes hypersensitive cell death upon pathogen infection. Plant Cell Physiol 2006, 47, 309–318.
- Devoto, A.; Muskett, P.R.; Shirasu, K. Role of ubiquitination in the regulation of plant defence against pathogens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol 2003, 6, 307–311.
- Chung, H.S. Role of JAZ Proteins in the Regulation of Jasmonate Signaling in Arabidopsis; Michigan State University: East Lansing, MI, USA, 2010.
- Chung, H.S.; Koo, A.J.K.; Gao, X.; Jayanty, S.; Thines, B.; Jones, A.D.; Howe, G.A. Regulation and function of Arabidopsis JASMONATE ZIM-domain genes in response to wounding and herbivory. Plant Physiol 2008, 146, 952–964.
- Li, J.W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Xie, C.H. Identification and transcriptional profiling of differentially expressed genes associated with resistance to Pseudoperonospora cubensis in cucumber. Plant Cell Rep 2011, 30, 345–357.
- Scharte, J.; Schön, H.; Weis, E. Photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in tobacco leaves during an incompatible interaction with Phytophthora nicotianae. Plant Cell Environ 2005, 28, 1421–1435.
- Akagi, A.; Dandekar, A.M.; Stotz, H.U. Resistance of Malus domestica fruit to Botrytis cinerea depends on endogenous ethylene biosynthesis. Phytopathology 2011, 101, 1311–1321.
- Moschou, P.N.; Sarris, P.F.; Skandalis, N.; Andriopoulou, A.H.; Paschalidis, K.A.; Panopoulos, N.J.; Roubelakis-Angelakis, K.A. Engineered polyamine catabolism preinduces tolerance of tobacco to bacteria and oomycetes. Plant Physiol 2009, 149, 1970–1981.
- Jeandet, P.; Douillet-Breuil, A.C.; Bessis, R.; Debord, S.; Sbaghi, M.; Adrian, M. Phytoalexins from the Vitaceae: Biosynthesis, phytoalexin gene expression in transgenic plants, antifungal activity, and metabolism. J. Agric. Food Chem 2002, 50, 2731–2741.
- Cools, H.; Ishii, H. Pre-treatment of cucumber plants with acibenzolar-S-methyl systemically primes a phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene (PAL1) for enhanced expression upon attack with a pathogenic fungus. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol 2002, 61, 273–280.
- Geetha, N.; Amruthesh, K.; Sharathchandra, R.; Shetty, H. Resistance to downy mildew in pearl millet is associated with increased phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity. Funct. Plant Biol 2005, 32, 267–275.
- Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, K.; Yang, J. An improved method for rapidly extracting total RNA from Vitis. J. Fruit Sci 2003, 20, 178–181.
- Ewing, B.; Hillier, L.D.; Wendl, M.C.; Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using Phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998, 8, 175–185.
- Chou, H.H.; Holmes, M.H. DNA sequence quality trimming and vector removal. Bioinformatics 2001, 17, 1093–1104.
- Zheng, Y.; Zhao, L.; Gao, J.; Fei, Z. iAssembler: A package for de novo assembly of Roche-454/Sanger transcriptome sequences. BMC Bioinform 2011, 12, 453.
- Apweiler, R.; Martin, M.; O’Donovan, C.; Magrane, M.; Alam-Faruque, Y.; Antunes, R.; Barrell, D.; Bely, B.; Bingley, M.; Binns, D. The universal protein resource (UniProt) in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38, 142–148.
- Finn, R.D.; Mistry, J.; Tate, J.; Coggill, P.; Heger, A.; Pollington, J.E.; Gavin, O.L.; Gunasekaran, P.; Ceric, G.; Forslund, K. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38, 211–222.
- Eddy, S.R. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics 1998, 14, 755–763.
- GO Slim and Subset Guide, Available online: http://www.geneontology.org/GO.slims.shtml , accessed on 15 May 2012.
|Table 1. PM-resistance related genes isolated from the SSH library in V. quinquangularis.|
|Unigene No.||Length (bp)||Putative Function||Organism of Best Homology||Accession No.||E-Value|
|UN018||706||Abscisic stress ripening protein||V. pseudoreticulata||ABC86744||5 × 10−21|
|UN022||548||GDP-d-glucose phosphorylase||A. thaliana||NP_200323||2 × 10−19|
|UN044 a||562||S-adenosylmethionine synthetase||R. communis||XP_002512570||4 × 10−101|
|UN102||369||ATP-dependent peptidase/ATPase/metallopeptidase||A. thaliana||NP_564563||3 × 10−59|
|UN127||829||Malate dehydrogenase||N. tabacum||CAC12826||3 × 10−139|
|UN145||540||Putative cinnamoyl-CoA reductase||R. communis||XP_002533639||4 × 10−19|
|UN173||250||ATP-dependent peptidase/ATPase/metallopeptidase||A. thaliana||NP_568604||9 × 10−6|
|UN178||592||GDSL-motif lipase/hydrolase family protein||A. thaliana||NP_190416||7 × 10−59|
|UN183||452||Malate dehydrogenase||V. vinifera||AAF69802||6 × 10−75|
|UN230||247||Aldo/keto reductase, putative||R. communis||XP_002535506||8 × 10−18|
|UN240||416||S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferase||A. thaliana||NP_173458||2 × 10−63|
|UN262||443||HMGB3 (High mobility group B 3)||A. thaliana||NP_001031075||3 × 10−27|
|UN266||558||NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2||A. thaliana||NP_085584||5 × 10−16|
|UN035||395||Naringenin-chalcone synthase||Humulus lupulus||CAK19317||2 × 10−45|
|UN040||645||Cinnamate-4-hydroxylase||Canarium album||ACR10242||2 × 10−99|
|UN118||204||Flavonol synthase||V. vinifera||BAE75808||1 × 10−26|
|UN166||333||Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase||Camellia oleifera||ACT21093||8 × 10−50|
|UN182 a||616||Chalcone-flavanone isomerase||A. thaliana||NP_568154||8 × 10−41|
|UN260 a||307||Phenylalanin ammonia-lyase||V. vinifera||ABM67591||3 × 10−25|
|Photosynthesis and Energy (15)|
|UN001||618||Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1||Acer rubrum||ABI94077||2 × 10−108|
|UN017||562||Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1||R. communis||XP_002532996||2 × 10−89|
|UN020||455||Photosystem I reaction center subunit II, chloroplast precursor||R. communis||XP_002516772||4 × 10−56|
|UN023||624||Photosystem II 22 kDa protein, chloroplast precursor||R. communis||XP_002513761||1 × 10−68|
|UN025||438||Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1||R. communis||XP_002532996||3 × 10−73|
|UN052||365||Chloroplast photosystem II 10 kDa polypeptide||Jatropha curcas||ADB93062||4 × 10−41|
|UN086||255||Photosystem I reaction center subunit II, chloroplast precursor||R. communis||XP_002516772||3 × 10−17|
|UN093||298||Putative fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase||R. communis||XP_002527886||3 × 10−28|
|UN095||348||Ribulose-1,5-bisphophate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1||V. pseudoreticulata||ABC86738||5 × 10−47|
|UN098||571||Putative fructose-bisphosphate aldolase||R. communis||XP_002512993||2 × 10−100|
|UN106||268||Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase 1||Gossypium hirsutum||ABB20913||2 × 10−20|
|UN121||371||Chlorophyll A/B binding protein||R. communis||XP_002533251||1 × 10−45|
|UN198||312||Light harvesting chlorophyll a/b-binding protein||Nicotiana sylvestris||BAA25394||2 × 10−35|
|UN241||189||Light-harvesting complex II protein Lhcb1||Populus trichocarpa||XP_002307725||4 × 10−11|
|UN255||324||Chlorophyll A/B binding protein||R. communis||XP_002519950||5 × 10−44|
|UN016||477||Stress-induced cysteine proteinase||Lavatera thuringiaca||AAB62937||4 × 10−66|
|UN033||427||Similar to pathogenesis-related protein 10.3||V. vinifera||XP_002274617||1 × 10−51|
|UN040||645||Cytochrome P450||Populus trichocarpa||XP_002325637||3 × 10−98|
|UN073 a||351||Thaumatin-like protein||V. vinifera||AAQ10092||7 × 10−67|
|UN075||346||Glutathione S-transferase 3||Papaver somniferum||AAF22519||1 × 10−8|
|UN077||450||Chaperone protein dnaJ||R. communis||XP_002514419||3 × 10−68|
|UN079||294||Responsive to dehydration 19||A. thaliana||NP_568052||2 × 10−43|
|UN096||755||Lipid transfer protein isoform 4||V. vinifera||AAO33394||3 × 10−47|
|UN170||468||Lipid transfer protein family protein||Tamarix hispida||ACM78616||6 × 10−8|
|UN205||470||Lipid transfer protein family protein||A. thaliana||NP_680546||5 × 10−31|
|UN226||537||Lipid transfer protein family protein||A. thaliana||NP_565348||2 × 10−33|
|UN115||574||Bacterial-induced peroxidase precursor||G. hirsutum||AAD43561||1 × 10−71|
|UN116 a||769||Similar to senescence-associated protein||A. thaliana||BAD42919||3 × 10−70|
|UN119||698||Catalase 1||N. tabacum||AAB71764||2 × 10−80|
|UN174 a||443||Class IV chitinase||N. tabacum||BAF44533||3 × 10−41|
|UN179||318||Proline-rich protein||Solanum tuberosum||CAA04449||1 × 10−22|
|UN209||212||Harpin-induced family protein||A. thaliana||NP_190008||1 × 10−22|
|UN219||341||Responsive to dehydration 21||A. thaliana||NP_564497||2 × 10−44|
|UN233||465||Proline-rich protein||G. hirsutum||ABM05952||2 × 10−16|
|UN239||240||Chitinase-like protein||G. hirsutum||AAQ56598||2 × 10−35|
|UN058||474||2OG-Fe(II) oxygenase family protein||A. thaliana||NP_192787||1 × 10−50|
|UN043||581||Ascorbate peroxidase 3||A. thaliana||NP_195226||4 × 10−67|
|Protein synthesis and fate (7)|
|UN004||372||40S ribosomal protein S17||A. thaliana||NP_196100||1 × 10−41|
|UN010||252||26S proteasome regulatory subunit||A. thaliana||AAP86657||2 × 10−39|
|UN134 a||468||Coronatine insensitive 1 (COI1)||A. thaliana||ABR45948||2 × 10−47|
|UN135 a||356||F-box family protein||A. thaliana||NP_199429||2 × 10−31|
|UN203 a||784||Jasmonate ZIM-domain protein 2||N. tabacum||BAG68656||5 × 10−43|
|UN214||352||Putative 40S Ribosomal protein||O. sativa||AAK92638||3 × 10−39|
|UN254||229||Aspartyl protease family protein||A. thaliana||NP_566966||3 × 10−15|
|Signal transduction (8)|
|UN005||653||Putative zinc finger protein||O. sativa||BAD87736||1 × 10−24|
|UN008||415||CIPK2; protein serine/threonine kinase||A. thaliana||NP_196324||2 × 10−11|
|UN031||410||Serine/threonine phosphatase||A. thaliana||NP_188632||5 × 10−29|
|UN151||332||CIPK21; protein serine/threonine kinase||A. thaliana||NP_568860||3 × 10−29|
|UN211||636||Lipid phosphate phosphatase 3||A. thaliana||NP_001078096||2 × 10−35|
|UN216||447||GTP binding/phospholipase activator||A. thaliana||NP_191788||1 × 10−79|
|UN217||508||Rab-type small GTP-binding protein||Cicer arietinum||BAA76423||2 × 10−49|
|UN238||543||Phosphoribulose kinase, putative||R. communis||XP_002519002||3 × 10−82|
|UN011||324||NRAMP3; transmembrane transporter||A. thaliana||NP_179896||6 × 10−45|
|UN029||862||Plasma membrane aquaporin||V. vinifera||AAF80557||2 × 10−148|
|UN030||910||Antiporter/triose-phosphate transmembrane transporter||A. thaliana||NP_851138||1 × 10−144|
|UN042||584||Putative sorbitol transporter||Prunus cerasus||AAM44082||7 × 10−91|
|UN067||647||Non-specific lipid transfer protein||V. vinifera||ABA29446||2 × 10−36|
|UN088||249||Plasma membrane intrinsic protein||A. thaliana||AAB65787||3 × 10−38|
|UN129||401||ABC transporter family protein||Populus trichocarpa||XP_002331473||6 × 10−60|
|UN136||478||ABC transporter-like||A. thaliana||BAF01914||3 × 10−83|
|UN231||565||ABC transporter family protein||Populus trichocarpa||XP_002308160||7 × 10−56|
|UN164||509||Polyol transporter||Populus trichocarpa||XP_002313809||4 × 10−68|
|UN223||269||Nitrate transporter||Malus hupehensis||ACN72639||2 × 10−34|
|UN221||329||Solute symporter family protein||A. thaliana||NP_199351||5 × 10−42|
|UN014||517||Transcription activator/transcription factor||A. thaliana||NP_197904||2 × 10−18|
|UN064||446||Transcript elongation factor||A. thaliana||NP_181390||5 × 10−27|
|UN065||443||IAA16; transcription factor||A. thaliana||NP_187124||3 × 10−46|
|UN167||430||DNA binding/transcription factor||A. thaliana||NP_172094||1 × 10−21|
aClones selected for further qRT-PCR analysis are marked with an asterisk.
© 2012 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).