Next Article in Journal
Polymorphism in Self-Assembled Structures of 9-Anthracene Carboxylic Acid on Ag(111)
Previous Article in Journal
The Kiss-and-Run Model of Intra-Golgi Transport

Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(6), 6820-6835; doi:10.3390/ijms13066820

Article
Ontogenic Expression Pattern and Genetic Polymorphisms of the Fatty Acid Transport Protein 4 (FATP4) Gene in Chinese Chicken Populations
Yan Wang , Qing Zhu , Ling Yang and Yi-Ping Liu *
College of Animal Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya’an, Sichuan 625014, China; E-Mails: wangyan519723614@yahoo.com.cn (Y.W.); zhuqing5959@163.com (Q.Z.); www.yangling999@sina.com (L.Y.)
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: liuyp578@yahoo.com; Tel.: +86-835-2882509; Fax: +86-835-2886080.
Received: 28 February 2012; in revised form: 23 May 2012 / Accepted: 29 May 2012 /
Published: 5 June 2012

Abstract

: In the current research, the polymorphism of FATP4 gene was analyzed in Erlang Mountainous chickens. A total of nine genetic variants were identified by FATP4 gene sequencing analysis across the chicken samples. Significant associations (p < 0.05) were observed for two SNPs (g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A in exon 6) with certain carcass traits (such as live weight, carcass weight, eviscerated weight) in S01 and S05 populations, respectively. Meanwhile, in S05 population, haplotype 3 (T-G) and haplotype 2 (C-A) were associated with higher and lower partial carcass traits such as live weight, carcass weight, eviscerated weight and semi-eviscerated weight, respectively. Moreover, we investigated the expression profile of this gene during ontogenesis in Mountainous black-boned chicken. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis showed that FATP4 mRNA had the highest expression level in small intestine tissue over all other tissues examined. The FATP4 mRNA levels presented remarkable developmental changes with age in the various tissues. These results suggested that the FATP4 gene might play an important role in controlling chicken carcass traits.
Keywords:
FATP4 gene; single nucleotide polymorphism; mRNA expression; carcass trait

1. Introduction

As the key metabolites for energy generation and storage, long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are crucial for cell function and activity. Cellular uptake and metabolism of long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs) are believed to be regulated by a variety of membrane-associated proteins ring [1] and are related to body composition. Previous studies have identified several candidate proteins that play active roles in this process, including fatty acid translocase (FAT/CD36) [2], fatty acid binding protein (FABPs) [3,4], long chain fatty acyl-CoA synthetases (ACSL) and fatty acid transport protein (FATPs) [5]. Specifically, FATPs proteins have been shown to participate in the transport of exogenous fatty acids into the cell. At present, six FATP isoforms have been identified. FATP1 is the major type in adipose tissue and is also present in heart and skeletal muscle [68]; FATP2 is mainly expressed in the liver and kidneys [1,6]; FATP3 is found in the liver, pancreas, and lungs [9,10]; FATP5 expression is prevalent in the liver [1,6]; and FATP6 is specifically expressed in the heart [11,12]. Interestingly, FATP4 is the only FATP found in the small intestine, but it is also expressed in adipose, brain, liver, skin and heart tissues [13]. In addition, FATP4 is involved in the absorption of dietary lipids [14] and may serve as a potential anti-obesity target [15].

The FATP4 gene (the other name is SLC27A4), which was first cloned and characterized in mice by Herrmann et al. [16], contains an open reading frame consisting of 1929 bp and encodes 643 amino acid residues. The exon-intron structure of murine FATP4 resembles that of human FATP4, indicating this gene is highly conserved [16]. Disruption of FATP4 in mice leads to neonatal mortality [15], and FATP4 heterozygous mice show decreased fatty acid uptake into enterocytes ex vivo, but no effect on fat absorption in vivo, possibly due to the large excess capacity for fat absorption in the small intestine. Lobo et al. [17] make use stable FAT4 knockdown 3T3-L1 cell lines to investigate the role of FATP4 in facilitating adipocyte fatty acid metabolism, they found that FATP4 exhibited reduced triacylglycerol deposition and increased basal lipolysis.

FATP4 polymorphisms and their association with metabolic alterations and dyslipidemia have been studied in humans as well. FATP4 was considered to be associated with ichthyosis prematurity syndrome [18], insulin resistance [19] and related disorders such as obesity, and it is negatively correlated with growth [20]. Variations in the FATP4 gene could affect body mass index and other obesity-related traits to different extents. In human, a mutation in exon 3, causing an amino acid exchange (p.G209S) in the FATP4 protein, was associated with lower body mass index (BMI), triacylglycerol and insulin concentrations, systolic blood pressure and homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA) [19]. Meanwhile, FATP4 expression had also been linked to markers of insulin resistance and obesity in humans [21]. In mice, Gimeno et al. [12] found that heterozygous FATP4 deletion mutants shown decreased fatty acid uptake into enterocytes ex vivo, but do not have decreased fat absorption in vivo. Similarly, Bower et al. [22] also found that increasing FATP4 mRNA and protein levels in adipocytes of obese subjects correlates with a higher LCFA uptake rates in African-American and Caucasian women.

Most previous studies concerning the tissue distribution of FATP4 have primarily been performed on human and mouse tissues. However, many important issues regarding FATP4 expression remain unresolved in chicken. First, whether the expression pattern is the same between mammals and birds is still not known. Second, the ontogenesis of chicken FATP4 mRNA expression has not been defined. This is vital to transporters because differences in expression during early development and adult maturation have been shown to result in differential susceptibility to injury. Third, there is currently no information associating FATP4 gene polymorphisms with chicken carcass traits. Thus the purpose of the current study was to determine (1) the expression levels of FATP4 mRNA in various chicken tissues, (2) the ontogenic expression pattern of the chicken FATP4 gene and (3) polymorphisms in FATP4 and their association with chicken carcass traits.

2. Results

2.1. Expression of FATP4 among Chicken Tissues

Quantitative PCR analysis showed that FATP4 mRNA was expressed in all eight MB chicken tissues. At 84 days, the mRNA levels of the chicken FATP4 gene were extremely high in the small intestine, followed by the leg muscle weight (LMW), brain, abdominal fat weight (AW), breast muscle weight (BMW), liver, subcutaneous fat (SFT) and heart (Table 1). The relative expression level of FATP4 in small intestine at 84 days was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than other all tissues and no significant expression differences among other tissues.

2.2. Ontogenic Expression of FATP4 in Chicken

To clarify whether the FATP4 mRNA expression had an age-related expression pattern, we investigated the ontogenic expression of this gene in eight MB chicken tissues. As shown in Figure 1, FATP4 mRNA expression levels showed no difference in leg muscle and subcutaneous fat at various days of age (p > 0.05). The FATP4 mRNA in breast muscle, contrastingly, had the highest expression on 0 day and the lowest expression on 14 days (p < 0.01). In abdominal fat, the expression level of FATP4 mRNA on 84 days was significantly higher than the expression on 28 days, 42 days and 70 days by 79.3%, 85.8% and 86.9%, respectively. In liver tissue, the level of FATP4 mRNA showed no difference between 0 day and each of the three growth points on 28 days, 42 days and 84 days. However, the expression of FATP4 mRNA on 56 days was significantly higher than the expression level on 0 day by 91.7% (p < 0.01) (Figure 1). In heart tissue, the FATP4 mRNA levels presented a unimodal distribution pattern with increasing age peaked on 42 days, but there were no significant differences at various ages (p > 0.05). In brain tissue, the FATP4 mRNA expression exhibited a “rise-decline-rise-decline” developmental change, and its expression on 56 days was significantly higher than at other times (p < 0.01). Finally, in small intestine, FATP4 was expressed at 56 days with a low level then increased to a peak at 70 days and down at 84 days. In addition, although the expression level of FATP4 mRNA on 70 days was higher than the expression on 56 days and 84 days by 48.9% and 29.8%, respectively, there were no differences at various days of age (p > 0.05).

2.3. Identification of Genetic Variants in Chicken FATP4 Gene

The direct sequencing of these fragments in representative samples showing different bands on SSCP gels (see Materials and Methods section) yielded a total of nine genetic variants. We named these polymorphisms relative to their respective positions on sequences of chicken genomic chromosome 17 (reverse strand; GenBank accession number NC_006104.2, GI: 118135643), and we deposited the SNPs in GenBank under dbSNP numbers ss345102396-ss345102405. The locations of the nine SNPs are as follows: one in intron 7 (g.5608272C>G, synonymous), one in intron 6 (g.5608695 G>A, synonymous), one in exon 9 (g.5607545T>C, synonymous), one in intron 10 (g.5606740C>T, synonymous), one in exon 13 (g.5606005A>G, synonymous), two in exon 14 (g.5605454C>T, synonymous; g.5605481G>A, synonymous), and the remaining two (which are also the only ones causing amino acid changes) in exon 6 (g.5608814G>A, p.A443T; g.5608778C>T, p.R455*).

We further estimated the likelihood that the two missense variants could cause a putatively functional impact on the FATP4 protein by using the cSNP analysis tool in PANTHER. The subPSEC score was −2.18124, and the pdeleterious value was 0.30603 for variant p.A443T. According to these results, the functional effect of variant p.A443T is unlikely to be harmful, but it may somewhat change normal gene functions. Variant p.R455* was found to be a nonsense mutation by analysis with PANTHER, so it likely alters normal gene function. Therefore, to confirm our hypothesis, we focused on these two variants with putatively functional roles in S01 and S05 chicken populations.

2.4. Association Analysis

Table 2 presents the association results of g.5608778C>T (p.R455*) and g.5608814G>A (p.A443T) genotypes with chicken carcass traits in two different populations. With the exception of g.5608778C>T in S01 populations, the allele frequencies of both g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A were not deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in two populations. In the S01 population, the g.5608778C>T SNP was significantly associated with BMW and with LMW (p < 0.05). All other traits were not significantly associated with this SNP (p > 0.05). In the S05 population, g.5608778C>T was significantly associated with all carcass traits except for AW. Genotype CC was associated with lower values of BW (p = 0.0003), CW (p = 0.0004), SEW (p = 0.0015), EW (p = 0.0006), zBMW (p = 0.0156) and LMW (p = 0.0047). Similarly, genotypes of g.5608814G>A in exon 6 were also associated with some chicken carcass traits in different populations (Table 2). In the S01 population, chickens with the GG genotype had the highest BW (p = 0.0229), CW (p = 0.0147) and EW (p = 0.0272), while the other traits were not significantly associated with this SNP. In the S05 population, the g.5608814G>A SNP was significantly associated with BW, CW, SEW and EW (p < 0.05), whereas it was negatively associated (p > 0.05) with BMW, LMW and AW. In addition, we found that the two SNPs were significantly associated with BW, CW, EW and SEW when both S01 and S05 were included in the analysis (data not shown).

To further define the haplotype structures of the FATP4 gene, haplotype blocks were analyzed using the Haploview program. Two most common LD measures, D′ and, were used to determine the extent of LD in the FATP4 gene. The D′ values for combinations of these two SNPs were 0.45 and r2 values were 0.12, which indicated that these two polymorphisms were linked.

Therefore, to discern the potential effect of haplotypes on carcass traits, the g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A haplotypes were analyzed in the S05 population. Four possible haplotypes were discerned: haplotype 1 = C-G with a frequency of 31.3%, haplotype 2 = C-A with a frequency of 24.6%, haplotype 3 = T-G with a frequency of 26.8%, and haplotype 4 = T-A with a frequency of 17.3%. In the S01 population, only haplotype 1 was well represented (data not shown) with the other haplotype frequencies equaling less than 10%; therefore, this population was not fully informative for a haplotype association analysis. Table 3 shows the estimated regression coefficient of the haplotype substitution effect for the carcass traits. For the S05 population, haplotype 3 (T-G) was the most favorable haplotype due to its association with higher BW, CW, EW, SEW, BMW and LMW (p < 0.05). On the contrary, animals with haplotype 2 (C-A) showed lower BW, CW, EW and SEW (p < 0.05). Haplotype 1 (C-G) showed lower BMW and LMW (p = 0.0421 and p = 0.0461, respectively), but had no correlation with other carcass traits. Haplotype 4 (T-A) did not correlate with any carcass traits (p > 0.05), possibly due to the small number of chickens with this haplotype.

3. Discussion

FATPs protein with six isoforms, one of which is FATP4, it plays an important role in fatty acid utilization. Understanding the tissue distribution of FATP4 may help identify its impact on organ-specific fatty-acid transportation. Previous studies concerning the tissue distribution of FATP4 were limited to a few tissues and focused on human and mice. Therefore, to our knowledge, this study represents the first attempt to characterize the mRNA expression profile of FATP4 in chickens. This study has generated important information regarding mRNA levels in different chicken tissues as well as differences between mammalian and avian genetics.

FATP4 mRNA was expressed in all the tissues examined. Consistent with previously published reports, FATP4 mRNA expression is highest in the small intestine, and is also present in brain, liver, heart, skeletal muscle and adipose tissues [6,2325]. FATP4 expression in the brain suggests that FATPs may be responsible for the activation of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid that is important for brain function [26]. Moreover, the strong expression of chicken FATP4 in the small intestine suggests that it may also be required for efficient uptake of fatty acids by these cells and confirm the FATP4 gene was seen in bird species like other species. Meanwhile, it is interesting to note that the expression level of the FATP4 mRNA in chicken breast muscle was higher than that of leg muscle at 0 day, 14 days, 28 days, 56 days and 70 days (Figure 1).

In order to obtain a comprehensive understanding of the characteristics of FATP4, we examined the ontogeny of FATP4 in specific tissues of chicken during development. Notable findings in our study include: (1) FATP4 was expressed in all examined tissues and throughout chicken development; (2) The expression level of FATP4 changed in different ways in the tissues as the chickens aged. We observed that the expression level of FATP4 mRNA in subcutaneous fat peaked at 42 days and then sharply decreased by subsequent time points. Contrastingly in mice, Feng demonstrated that the mRNA expression of FATP4 in fatty liver increased at 2 weeks, and was especially high at 12 weeks after a high-fat diet [27]. Schmuth et al. (2005) also reported FATP4 to be highly expressed in subcutaneous fat and sebaceous glands [28].

As this study is the first describing the expression of FATP4 in chicken tissues over the course of development, these findings broaden our understanding of the mechanisms underlying normal fatty acid transportation in different tissues, opening the door for future research on FATP4 as a potential target in preventing or reversing obesity.

Our current study shows that the FATP4 gene is associated with some chicken carcass traits. We found that in the S01 population, the g.5608778C>T SNP was significantly associated with BMW and LMW, but not with other traits. However, in the S05 population, g.5608778C>T was significantly associated with all carcass traits except for AW. Similarly, genotypes of g.5608814G>A were significantly associated with BW, CW and EW in the S01 populations and significantly associated with all carcass traits except for AW in the S05 population.

It might be contested that the results of SNP association conflict with each other for S01 and S05 in regards to several traits such as body type, body weight and speed of growth. Two explanations are possible. The first is that the two populations have different backgrounds and characteristics. The S01 chickens grow faster than S05, while all other examined carcass trait parameters were lower than for S05. Conversely, S05 is a larger, meatier chicken and, thus, has been subjected to intensive artificial selection for its favorable commercial traits, such as carcass weight, eviscerated weight, and breast muscle weight. The second hypothesis proposes that additional polymorphisms possibly affecting the analyzed traits ought to be considered in the two populations.

The traditional approach for studying a candidate gene with complex traits generally uses one or a few SNPs; however, haplotype analysis is thought to be more powerful than single SNP analysis in searching for genetic determinants of complex diseases or traits [29]. However, the effectiveness of haplotype phasing compared to single SNP analysis has been debated for several years. Daly et al. demonstrated that the haplotype or haplotype block provided a practical solution to resolve some problems such as unsatisfied and obscured localization information [30]. Conversely, Clark concluded that if the causal connection between SNP and a the phenotype is truly driven by just a single SNP, the haplotype approach may perform worse than the one SNP analysis [31]. Therefore, to dissect the effects of the haplotypes on carcass traits, we analyzed the g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A haplotypes in the S05 population. Four possible haplotypes were discerned. Haplotype 3 (T-G) was most favorable with respect to BW, CW, EW, SEW, BMW and LMW (p < 0.05). In most of the situations tested, haplotype 2 (C-A) showed lower BW, CW, EW and SEW. Values for haplotype 4 (T-A) were not associated to any carcass traits. So, the current data shows that associations of haplotypes with carcass traits were more accurate than those of single SNP. This result implies that different SNPs interact with each other and that haplotypes generally provide more information than individual SNPs [32].

In summary, our results show that the two SNPs (g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A) and haplotypes were associated with certain carcass traits (BW, CW, EW and SEW) in the studied chicken populations. Therefore, these markers have practical implications: (1) these SNPs could be used for marker-assisted selection in both populations and (2) the FATP4 gene could be directly or indirectly involved in affecting carcass trait phenotypes. However, to avoid any possible bias due to the relatively small population size in this study, a future investigation with a larger sample size and more breeds is necessary.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Animal

The Mountainous Black-boned chicken (MB) is a well-known bird with spotty feathers, black or yellow skin and favorable meat quality natively bred in Sichuan Province, China. MB chickens were used in the expression study, and all chickens were raised on an experimental farm for poultry breeding at the Sichuan Agricultural University (Ya’an, China) under the same conditions. For the ontogeny studies, different tissues including heart, liver, brain, leg muscle, breast muscle, abdominal fat, subcutaneous fat and the small intestine from male chicken were collected at 0 day, 14 days, 28 days, 42 days, 56 days, 70 days and 84 days of age (five samples of each age). Fresh tissues were identified, excised, then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until mRNA isolation took place. For quantification of the overall tissue expression profile of chicken FATP4 mRNA, five adult male chicken at growth point 84 days were used, and the above eight tissues were collected and frozen in the same way.

Two groups of chicken (S01 and S05) were selected for association analysis between DNA markers and carcass traits. S01 and S05 belong to Erlang Mountainous chickens. The first group was made up by 128 S01 chickens (65 females and 63 males) with yellow partridge plumage, blue shanks and white skin. These chickens had a favorable quality of meat and grew at a fast rate. The second group of chickens was made of 136 S05 chickens (69 females and 67 males) with big bodily forms and a high quantity of meat. Eggs of the two breeds were hatched in different incubators under the same conditions on 15 March 2008; the chickens were kept in single-breed pens and were slaughtered on 15 June 2008. During the growth period, all birds had free access to food and water ad libitum under the same temperature and lighting conditions. From birth to 3 weeks of age, chickens were fed, ad libitum, a starting diet containing 2.90 megacalories (Mcal) of metabolizable energy (ME)/kg of body weight and 20.5 g of crude protein (CP)/kg of body weight. Birds were fed a grower diet (3.00 Mcal of ME/kg and 18.5 g of CP/kg) from 4 to 6 weeks of age and were transferred to growing pens at 7 weeks. Before the chickens were slaughtered, a blood sample was collected and stored at −20 °C for each one.

4.2. Measurement of Carcass Traits

The two groups of chicken used for the association study were measured for performance-tested traits at the Sichuan Dahen Poultry Breeding Company. At the age of 90 days, live weight (BW) was measured on chickens restricted from feed for 12 h. After slaughter on that same day, the carcass traits were measured, including carcass weight (CW), eviscerated weight (EW), semi-eviscerated weight (SEW), breast muscle weight (BMW), leg muscle weight (LMW) and abdominal fat weight (AW). CW was measured of chilled carcasses removed of feathers. SEW was measured of carcasses removed of the trachea, esophagus, gastrointestinal tract, spleen, pancreas, and gonad. EW was measured of the semi-eviscerated carcasses after additional removal of the head, claws, heart, liver, gizzard, glandular stomach and abdominal fat.

4.3. RNA Extraction, cDNA Synthesis and Quantification of FATP4 mRNA Expression

Total RNA was extracted from chicken tissues using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and was treated with RNase-free DNase I using the RNase-free DNase Set (TakaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China). For each sample, about 1 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (TakaRa Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China). The reaction was performed in a volume of 10 μL containing 5× PrimerScript Buffer, 10 mM of each dNTPs, 40 U/μL RNase Inhibitor and 2.5 μM oligo-dT Primer. The reverse transcription was maintained at 30 °C for 10 min, and then at 45 °C for 25 min. The cDNA product was stored at −20 °C.

The FATP4 mRNA expression levels in different tissues collected at different developmental stages of male MB chicken were quantified by the SYBR Green I assay on an IQ5 real-time PCR thermal cycle instrument (Bio-Rad, USA). Chicken mRNA sequences of the β-actin gene (GenBank accession number NM_205518) and SLC27A4 (accession number XM_415504) were retrieved from GenBank. Primers were designed using Oligo 6.0 (Table 1). Reactions were performed in triplicate in a volume of 12.5 μL containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCL, 3.5 mM MgCL2, 50 U/mL Takara ExTaq™ R-PCR (Takara, Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China), 0.2 μM of each specific primer and 0.25 μL/300 diluted SYBR Green I (Takara, Biotechnology Co. Ltd., Dalian, China). The cycling condition consisted of an initial denaturation cycle for 5 min at 95 °C, then 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 40 s at 61 °C, and 45 s at 72 °C, ending with 8 min at 72 °C. Gene expression levels were quantified relatively to the expression of β-actin using the comparative 2−ΔΔCT method [33]. Then, data of the mRNA expressions were subjected to ANOVA and/or t-test to determine the difference between tissues/growth points using SAS software 6.12 (SAS Institute Inc.). The p-value for significance was set at p ≤ 0.01.

4.4. Identification of FATP4 Genetic Variants

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using the standard phenol/chloroform method. According to the UCSC Genome Browser information for the chicken genome, May 2006 Assembly [34] that was retrieved by searching for the Gallus gallus FATP4 sequence (GenBank accession number XM_415504), the chicken FATP4 gene contains 15 exons. Fifteen pairs of primers were designed to amplify these exons (and partially cover some introns) (Table 4). Primer synthesis was completed by Shanghai Yingjun Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). PCR reactions were performed using the Gene Amp PCR System 9700 (Bio-Rad, USA) thermal cycler in a final volume of 10 μL reaction containing 10–100 ng genomic DNA, 10 pmol of each primer and 5 μL 2× Master mix (including Mg2+, dNTPs, Taq DNA polymerase; Beijing TIAN WEI Biology Technique Corporation, Beijing, China). The amplification condition included an initial step of denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C; 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 35 s at 55 °C (or other apt annealing temperature as shown in Table 1), and 45 s at 72 °C; then ended with a final extension step for 7 min at 72 °C. Genetic variants in the FATP4 genomic sequence were analyzed by using the PCR-SSCP (single strand conformation polymorphism) method. Briefly, after a denaturation at 99 °C for 10 min, 3 μL of PCR product was rapidly cooled on ice and then loaded on 12% acrylamide/bisacrylamide (39:1) gels. Electrophoresis was performed at 120–150 V for 13–15 h in 1× TBE buffer, and gels were silver-stained. Three DNA samples showing different patterns on SSCP gel were further amplified and purified, and then sequenced by Shanghai Yingjun Biology Technique Corporation (Shanghai, China).

4.5. Data Analysis

We performed in silico functional predictions for FATP4 gene nonsynonymous variations using PANTHER (Protein analysis through evolutionary relationships) [35], which estimates the likelihood of a particular amino acid substitution to cause a functional impact on a protein. It calculates the substitution position-specific evolutionary conservation (subPSEC) score and the probability of a deleterious effect on protein function caused by a given variant (pdeleterious). PANTHER subPSEC scores are continuous values from 0 (neutral) to about −10 (most likely to be deleterious), and a subPSEC score of −3 corresponds to a pdeleterious of 0.5 [36].

Association analyses were carried out independently for the S01 and S05 chickens. The general linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS 6.12 (Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC) was used to test associations between the genotyped markers and carcass traits. The model is as follows:

Y ijk = μ + S i + G j + Sire k + e ijk

where Yijk is the trait measured in animal k, Si is the effect of the ith sex category, Gj is the effect of the genotype j for SNP in the FATP4 gene, Sirek is the effect of the sire k and eijk is the residual random effect associated with animal k.

In addition, the identified SNPs (g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A) in this gene were tested for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and the linkage disequilibrium (LD) between SNPs was tested by the Haploview [37]. Two parameters, including D′ and r2, were used to characterize LD patterns within the FATP4 gene. The value of D′ > 0.33 and r2 > 0.1 were applied as the criterion for meaningful LD [36]. Haplotypes between the g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A were constructed using the PHASE program v. 2.0 [38]. Haplotypes were analyzed using the model applied for the single marker association test with consideration for animals having 0, 1, or 2 copies of the haplotype in question. The PROC REG procedure of SAS (version 8.02, SAS Institute Inc.) was used to perform the analysis. Significant associations were declared when p < 0.05.

5. Conclusion

In summary, we characterized the FATP4 gene expression in eight tissues of MB chicken and performed association analyses to discern the effect of FATP4 gene variants on chicken carcass traits. Data presented in our study provide a basis for future studies on chicken FATP4 function and will potentially lead to a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms involved in chicken small intestine and skeletal muscles. The FATP4 gene variants (g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A) that had a significant association with carcass traits may be used as genetic markers linking to quantitative trait loci or to a major gene with effects on carcass traits. Further analyses of the effects of FATP4 SNPs are essential to confirm the association between the alleles or haplotypes and chicken carcass traits in other chicken breeds and lines.

Acknowledgments

We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their critical comments on the early version of the manuscript. We appreciate language editing by Diana Chen of My Editor-in-Chief. This work was financially supported by the Chinese National Key Technologies R&D Programme (2008BADB2B01), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University, the Science Fund for Young Scholars in Sichuan Province (ZQ 026-017).

References

  1. Pohl, J.; Ring, A.; Hermann, T.; Stremmel, W. Role of FATP in parenchymal cell fatty acid uptake. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2004, 1686, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Coburn, C.T.; Hajri, T.; Ibrahimi, A.; Abumrad, N.A. Role of CD36 in membrane transport and utilization of long-chain fatty acids by different tissues. J. Mol. Neurosci 2001, 16, 117–121. [Google Scholar]
  3. Glatz, J.F.C.; Luiken, J.J.F.P.; van Bilsen, M.; van der Vusse, G.J. Cellular lipid binding proteins as facilitators and regulators of lipid metabolism. Mol. Cell Biochem 2002, 239, 3–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, H.; Starodub, O.; McIntosh, A.; Kier, A.B.; Schroeder, F. Liver fatty acid-binding protein targets fatty acids to the nucleus. Real time confocal and multiphoton fluorescence imaging in living cells. J. Biol. Chem 2002, 277, 29139–29151. [Google Scholar]
  5. Stahl, A. A current review of fatty acid transport proteins (SLC27). Pflügers Arch 2004, 447, 722–727. [Google Scholar]
  6. Binnert, C.; Koistinen, H.A.; Martin, G.; Andreelli, F.; Ebeling, P.; Koivisto, V.A.; Laville, M.; Auwerx, J.; Vidal, H. Fatty acid transport protein-1 mRNA expression in skeletal muscle and in adipose tissue in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 2000, 279, E1072–E1079. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fisher, R.M.; Gertow, K. Fatty acid transport proteins and insulin resistance. Curr. Opin. Lipidol 2005, 16, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pohl, J.; Fitscher, B.A.; Ring, A.; Ihl-Vahl, R.; Strasser, R.H.; Stremmel, W. Fatty acid transporters in plasma membranes of cardiomyocytes in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Med. Res 2000, 5, 438–442. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pei, Z.; Fraisl, P.; Berger, J.; Jia, Z.; Forss-Petter, S.; Watkins, P.A. Mouse very long-chain Acyl-CoA synthetase 3/fatty acid transport protein 3 catalyzes fatty acid activation but not fatty acid transport in MA-10 cells. J. Biol. Chem 2004, 279, 54454–54462. [Google Scholar]
  10. Stahl, A.; Gimeno, R.E.; Tartaglia, L.A.; Lodish, H.F. Fatty acid transport proteins: A current view of a growing family. Trends Endocrinol. Metab 2001, 12, 266–273. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gimeno, R.E. Fatty acid transport proteins. Curr. Opin. Lipidol 2007, 18, 271–276. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gimeno, R.E.; Ortegon, A.M.; Patel, S.; Punreddy, S.; Ge, P.; Sun, Y.; Lodish, H.F.; Stahl, A. Characterization of a heart-specific fatty acid transport protein. J. Biol. Chem 2003, 278, 16039–16044. [Google Scholar]
  13. Doege, H.; Baillie, R.A.; Ortegon, A.M.; Tsang, B.; Wu, Q.; Punreddy, S.; Hirsch, D.; Watson, N.; Gimeno, R.E.; Stahl, A. Targeted deletion of FATP5 reveals multiple functions in liver metabolism: Alterations in hepatic lipid homeostasis. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1245–1258. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhou, W.; Madrid, P.; Fluitt, A.; Stahl, A.; Xie, X.S. Development and validation of a high-throughput screening assay for human long-chain fatty acid transport proteins 4 and 5. J. Biomol. Screen 2010, 15, 488–497. [Google Scholar]
  15. Herrmann, T.; van der Hoeven, F.; Grone, H.J.; Stewart, A.F.; Langbein, L.; Kaiser, I.; Liebisch, G.; Gosch, I.; Buchkremer, F.; Drobnik, W. Mice with targeted disruption of the fatty acid transport protein 4 (Fatp 4, Slc27a4) gene show features of lethal restrictive dermopathy. J. Cell Biol 2003, 161, 1105–1115. [Google Scholar]
  16. Herrmann, T.; Buchkremer, F.; Gosch, I.; Hall, A.M.; Bernlohr, D.A.; Stremmel, W. Mouse fatty acid transport protein 4 (FATP4): Characterization of the gene and functional assessment as a very long chain acyl-CoA synthetase. Gene 2001, 270, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lobo, S.; Wiczer, B.M.; Smith, A.J.; Hall, A.M.; Bernlohr, D.A. Fatty acid metabolism in adipocytes: Functional analysis of fatty acid transport proteins 1 and 4. J. Lipid Res 2007, 48, 609–620. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sobol, M.; Dahl, N.; Klar, J. FATP4 missense and nonsense mutations cause similar features in Ichthyosis Prematurity Syndrome. BMC Res. Notes 2011, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gertow, K.; Bellanda, M.; Eriksson, P.; Boquist, S.; Hamsten, A.; Sunnerhagen, M.; Fisher, R. Genetic and structural evaluation of fatty acid transport protein-4 in relation to markers of the insulin resistance syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 2004, 89, 392–399. [Google Scholar]
  20. Doege, H.; Stahl, A. Protein-mediated fatty acid uptake: Novel insights from in vivo models. Physiology 2006, 21, 259–268. [Google Scholar]
  21. Gertow, K.; Rosell, M.; Sjogren, P.; Eriksson, P.; Vessby, B.; de Faire, U.; Hamsten, A.; Hellenius, M.L.; Fisher, R.M. Fatty acid handling protein expression in adipose tissue, fatty acid composition of adipose tissue and serum, and markers of insulin resistance. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr 2006, 60, 1406–1413. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bower, J.F.; Davis, J.M.; Hao, E.; Barakat, H.A. Differences in transport of fatty acids and expression of fatty acid transporting proteins in adipose tissue of obese black and white women. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab 2006, 290, E87–E91. [Google Scholar]
  23. Fitscher, B.A.; Riedel, H.D.; Young, K.C.; Stremmel, W. Tissue distribution and cDNA cloning of a human fatty acid transport protein (hsFATP4). BBA Gene Struct. Expr 1998, 1443, 381–385. [Google Scholar]
  24. Schaffer, J.E.; Lodish, H.F. Expression cloning and characterization of a novel adipocyte long chain fatty acid transport protein. Cell 1994, 79, 427–436. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stahl, A.; Hirsch, D.J.; Gimeno, R.E.; Punreddy, S.; Ge, P.; Watson, N.; Patel, S.; Kotler, M.; Raimondi, A.; Tartaglia, L.A. Identification of the major intestinal fatty acid transport protein. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 299–308. [Google Scholar]
  26. Duttaroy, A.K. Transport of fatty acids across the human placenta: A review. Prog. Lipid Res 2009, 48, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
  27. Feng, A.J.; Wang, J.; Chen, D.F. Roles of fatty acid transport protein 4 in nonalcoholic fatty liver rats. Acta Acad. Med. Mil. Tertiae 2004, 26, 1726–1728. [Google Scholar]
  28. Schmuth, M.; Ortegon, A.M.; Mao-Qiang, M.; Elias, P.M.; Feingold, K.R.; Stahl, A. Differential expression of fatty acid transport protein in epidermis and skin appendages. J. Invest. Dermatol 2005, 6, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cardon, L.R.; Abecasis, G.R. Using haplotype blocks to map human complex trait loci. Trends Genet 2003, 19, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
  30. Daly, M.J.; Rioux, J.D.; Schaffner, S.F.; Hudson, T.J.; Lander, E.S. High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat. Genet 2001, 29, 229–232. [Google Scholar]
  31. Clark, A.G. The role of haplotypes in candidate gene studies. Genet. Epidemiol 2004, 27, 321–333. [Google Scholar]
  32. Stephens, M.; Smith, N.J.; Donnelly, P. A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am. J. Hum. Genet 2001, 68, 978–989. [Google Scholar]
  33. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar]
  34. Human BLAT Search, Available online: http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgBlat?hgsid=168237115 accessed on 15 January 2012.
  35. Thomas, P.D.; Campbell, M.J.; Kejariwal, A.; Mi, H.; Karlak, B.; Daverman, R.; Diemer, K.; Muruganujan, A.; Narechania, A. PANTHER: A library of protein families and subfamilies indexed by function. Genome Res 2003, 13, 2129–2141. [Google Scholar]
  36. Thomas, P.D.; Kejariwal, A.; Guo, N.; Mi, H.; Campbell, M.J.; Muruganujan, A.; Lazareva-Ulitsky, B. Applications for protein sequence-function evolution data: mRNA/protein expression analysis Uand coding SNP scoring tools. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34, W645–W650. [Google Scholar]
  37. Barrett, J.C.; Fry, B.; Maller, J.; Daly, M.J. Haploview: Analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 263–265. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kruglyak, L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nat. Genet 1999, 22, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
Ijms 13 06820f1 1024
Figure 1. Relative FATP4 mRNA expression levels of different Mountainous Black-boned chicken tissues at different ages. Data were normalized with β-actin in each sample and are presented as means ± SD. LMW = leg muscle; BMW = breast muscle; SFT = subcutaneous fat; AW = abdominal fat.

Click here to enlarge figure

Figure 1. Relative FATP4 mRNA expression levels of different Mountainous Black-boned chicken tissues at different ages. Data were normalized with β-actin in each sample and are presented as means ± SD. LMW = leg muscle; BMW = breast muscle; SFT = subcutaneous fat; AW = abdominal fat.
Ijms 13 06820f1 1024
Table Table 1. Expression of FATP4 mRNA at 84 days among chicken tissues.

Click here to display table

Table 1. Expression of FATP4 mRNA at 84 days among chicken tissues.
TissueLMWBMWSFTAWLiverBrainHeartSmall intestine
Expression level0.0101 ± 0.0163 b0.0011 ± 0.0163 b0.0009 ± 0.0163 b0.0012 ± 0.0163 b0.0010 ± 0.0163 b0.0014 ± 0.0163 b0.0005 ± 0.0163 b0.3494 ± 0.0167 a

LMW = leg muscle; BMW = breast muscle; SFT = subcutaneous fat; AW = abdominal fat.

Table Table 2. Associations between the FATP4 g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A genotypes and carcass traits in S01 and S05 chicken populations.

Click here to display table

Table 2. Associations between the FATP4 g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A genotypes and carcass traits in S01 and S05 chicken populations.
Breed/LineTraits 1g.5608778C>T genotypep valueg.5608814G>A genotypep value


CC (n = 28)CT (n = 82)TT (n = 18)GG (n = 36 )GA (n = 71)AA (n = 21)
S01BW (g)1807.85 (86.64)1925.18 (50.94)1720.00(108.06)0.16841925.83 (75.19)1779.57 (53.92)2077.14 (98.45)0.0229
CW (g)1608.75 (80.21)1710.25 (47.75)1497.65(102.94)0.13971718.06 (69.43)1564.70 (50.89)1853.81 (90.91)0.0147
SEW (g)1508.93 (133.01)1597.16 (79.19)1827.06(170.70)0.33291611.11 (118.06)1573.66 (86.54)1716.67 (154.58)0.7223
EW (g)1252.14 (65.13)1330.51 (38.78)1160.53 (83.60)0.17471342.36 (56.57)1218.81 (41.47)1430.95 (74.07)0.0272
BMW (g)132.57 (7.06)104.59 (4.20)103.25 (9.34)0.0028104.86 (6.50)111.77 (4.80)117.86 (8.51)0.4597
LMW (g)183.75 (11.54)150.57 (6.87)140.19 (15.26)0.0268148.00 (10.39)156.44 (7.68)172.86 (13.61)0.3513
AW (g)46.75 (5.32)47.27 (3.17)42.75 (7.05)0.842650.17 (4.68)43.94 (3.46)48.62 (6.13)0.5287
p (HWE)0.0010.1578

TraitsCC (n = 43)CT (n = 66)TT (n = 27)p valueGG (n = 45)GA (n = 68)AA (n = 23)p value

S05BW (g)1867.91 (65.66)2035.15 (53.00)2308.89 (82.86)0.00032171.56 (65.80)1917.35 (53.53)2125.22 (92.04)0.0077
CW (g)1677.32 (60.84)1819.62 (49.11)2074.44(76.78)0.00041950.22 (60.86)1717.21 (49.51)1900.00 (85.12)0.0090
SEW (g)1574.53 (61.69)1691.97 (49.79)1940.74 (77.85)0.00151826.67 (61.55)1609.04 (50.07)1746.09 (86.10)0.0225
EW (g)1307.21 (49.86)1428.41 (40.25)1625.07 (62.92)0.00061532.11 (49.66)1338.49 (40.39)1495.65 (69.46)0.0072
BMW (g)104.42 (3.90)113.26 (3.15)122.67 (4.93)0.0156116.56 (3.85)107.07 (3.13)119.61 (5.39)0.0575
LMW (g)137.40 (6.78)156.06 (5.48)173.22 (8.56)0.0047163.71 (6.75)144.07 (5.49)161.78 (9.45)0.0532
AW (g)60.74 (10.04)59.74 (8.11)80.67 (12.67)0.351468.82 (9.87)63.36 (8.03)57.70 (13.82)0.7984
p (HWE)0.85390.7540

The values for each trait refer to the least square means (LSM), with their standard errors displayed in parenthesis;1BW = live weight (g); CW = carcass weight (g); SEW = semi-eviscerated weight (g); EW = eviscerated weight (g); BMW = breast muscle weight (g); LMW = leg muscle weight (g); AW = abdominal fat weight (g); p (HWE) = The values of Hardy-Weinberg test.

Table Table 3. Estimated regression coefficients and standard errors (SE) of the haplotype substitution effect on carcass traits in the S05 chicken population.

Click here to display table

Table 3. Estimated regression coefficients and standard errors (SE) of the haplotype substitution effect on carcass traits in the S05 chicken population.
Haplotype 1 (C-G) 2Haplotype 2 (C-A) 2Haplotype 3 (T-G) 2Haplotype 4 (T-A) 2

Traits 1Regression Coefficient (SE)p valueRegression Coefficient (SE)p valueRegression Coefficient (SE)p valueRegression Coefficient (SE)p value
BW (g)−115.324 (61.308)0.0621−196.131 (67.671)0.0044185.277 (59.189)0.0021140.408 (81.034)0.0854
CW (g)−99.764 (56.724)0.0809−180.269 (62.528)0.0046167.779 (54.752)0.0026122.698 (74.942)0.1039
SEW (g)−84.273 (57.175)0.1428−173.478 (62.974)0.0067164.280 (55.099)0.003492.618 (75.611)0.2228
EW (g)−82.293 (46.354)0.0781−142.542 (51.211)0.0062136.279 (44.773)0.002896.495 (61.301)0.1178
BMW (g)−7.240 (3.528)0.0421−5.351 (3.998)0.18307.466 (3.478)0.03366.649 (4.692)0.1588
LMW (g)−12.463 (6.190)0.0461−12.954 (6.968)0.065216.979 (6.027)0.00569.238 (8.250)0.2648
AW (g)−0.818 (9.006)0.9277−12.846 (10.054)0.20357.253 (8.868)0.41496.194 (11.868)0.6026

1BW=live weight (g); CW = carcass weight (g); SEW=semi-eviscerated weight (g); EW= eviscerated weight (g); BMW = breast muscle weight (g); LMW= leg muscle weight (g); AW = abdominal fat weight (g);2Haplotypes are indicated with the respective allele status of SNPs g.5608778C>T and g.5608814G>A.

Table Table 4. Primer pairs used in this study.

Click here to display table

Table 4. Primer pairs used in this study.
Primer namePrimer sequence (5′→3′)Annealing temperature (°C)Product length (bp)Amplified region
Primer pairs for measuring chicken FATP4 gene expression
 FATP4-FCATCACCATCTCCAACTCCAAG611261188–1313
 FATP4-RGACTCAGGGCTTCCTTCTCCT
 β-actin-FGAGAAATTGTGCGTGACATCA60180685–836
 β-actin-RCCTGAACCTCTCATTGCCA
Primer pairs for screening chicken FATP4 gene polymorphisms
  P-1FTCCGGGATCCCACGAGAC542435614016–5614358
  P-1RACGGCATTGGTGGCATAGCA
  P-2FACGAGGCGGTTATTC553095613698–5614006
  P-2RGTCCCACCAGAGTCGCATTT
  P-3FCGCCGCGCTAGAAGT572395613326–5613664
  P-3RCCCGCTGGGAGCTGTAGT
  P-4FCAGGCCAAGATGCTGCGTCTGGCT552155610456–5610670
  P-4RACACACCCCAGCGCACAGTT
  P-5FGTCCTGCTGCGGGTGAAGTG553025609605–5609906
  P-5RGAATTCACCAGGGCCGTCT
  P-6FCCGGTGCTCTTTCTCCATCT553135608527–5608939
  P-6RCTCTGCTGCTGAAGTCTGCC
  P-7FCGCTGCATGTGTGACCTTGT552335608184–5608418
  P-7RGCCATGCGGAAATACCTG
  P-8FGGCCCTGCTTCTGACAT551525608087–5608238
  P-8RGTCCCAAGGGCACACGTTAC
  P-9FGGGAACTCGGGGTACTGA552455607424–5607668
  P-9RGACAGACAGGCAGAACGAGT
  P-10FTTGCCCCTGCTAGATTGT552045606940–5607143
  P-10RAGGCTGCAGTTGCACTCGGT
  P-11FCATGGCGTGCGTTAAGAT551665606652–5606817
  P-11RAAGCCAATGGGGTACACT
  P-12FCCTTGGGCATGAGCGGTC AC551415606311–5606451
  P-12RTTGCTGGTGGCTGACTGATT
  P-13FGCTCCTCTCACACCTCGTT552325605920–5606151
  P-13RCCCTCCCCTCTCAGTTAC
  P-14FAGGGTGTCGCTGGTAAAC553085605358–5605665
  P-14RGTGCAGGAACCGTAGGA
  P-15FGAAGATGGAGCTGCGTAA552475604728–5604974
  P-15RCTAGTGTGCCTTTATACC

The forward and reverse primers are marked by “F” and “R” in the primer names, respectively; The locations of the FATP4 gene exons in the genomic region were scored according to the UCSC Chicken Genome Browser May 2006 Assembly [34], using the Gallus gallus FATP4 gene sequence (GenBank accession number XM_415504).

Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert