Next Article in Journal
Chemical Composition, Antioxidant, and Antimicrobial Activities of Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash Essential Oil Extracted by Carbon Dioxide Expanded Ethanol
Next Article in Special Issue
Protective Effects of Defatted Sticky Rice Bran Extracts on the Early Stages of Hepatocarcinogenesis in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Size-Dependent Sublimation Kinetics of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT) Micro-Islands Using In Situ Atomic Force Microscopy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Red Beetroot and Betalains as Cancer Chemopreventative Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 24
Issue 10
10.3390/molecules24101896
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Imaging Flow Cytometric Analysis of Stilbene-Dependent Apoptosis in Drug Resistant Human Leukemic Cell Lines

by
Marcin Czop
1,*,
Anna Bogucka-Kocka
2,
Tomasz Kubrak
3,
Karolina Knap-Czop
1,
Anna Makuch-Kocka
4,
Dariusz Galkowski
5,
Joanna Wawer
1,
Tomasz Kocki
6 and
Janusz Kocki
1
1
Clinical Genetics Department, Medical University of Lublin, 11 Radziwillowska Str., 20-080 Lublin, Poland
2
Chair and Department of Biology and Genetics, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodzki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Biochemistry and General Chemistry, University of Rzeszów, 2a Kopisto Al., 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland
4
Department of Pharmacology, Medical University of Lublin, 4a Chodzki Str., 20-093 Lublin, Poland
5
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Medical Education Building – 212, One Robert Wood Johnson Place, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA
6
Chair and Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Lublin, 8b Jaczewskiego Str, 20-093 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2019, 24(10), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101896
Submission received: 28 March 2019 / Revised: 3 May 2019 / Accepted: 16 May 2019 / Published: 17 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Products for Cancer Chemoprevention)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The natural compounds have been researched extensively as an alternative to the conventional chemotherapy and radiation. Stilbene derivatives appear as a group of therapeutics which deserves special attention. The present study was designed to analyze the effects of stilbene derivatives on drug resistant human leukemic cells. The aim of this work was to evaluate the apoptotic effect of stilbene derivatives in various concentrations on leukemic cells (LC) with and without resistant phenotype. Methods: Human acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) cell lines (HL60, HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines (CEM/C1, CCRF-CEM) were studied. T-resveratrol, piceatannol, rhaponticin, deoxyrhaponticin, pterostilbene were used to stimulate apoptosis. Mitoxantrone (MIT) was applied to induce drug resistance. Results: t-Resveratrol (RES), deoxyrhaponticin (D-RHAP), rhaponticin (RHAP), pterostilbene (PTER), and piceatannol (PIC) influenced viability and induced apoptosis in all investigated cell lines. Conclusions: Our results confirmed that RES, PIC, RHAP, D-RHAP, and PTER are essential therapeutic compounds with anticancer activity exhibited by induction of apoptosis in leukemic cells with and without resistant phenotype. Stilbene-induced apoptosis in HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, CEM/C1, and CCRF-CEM leukemia cell lines have been presented in very few studies so far and our research is an important contribution to the investigation of these substances.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Cancer still presents as one of the most substantial healthcare problems in many, especially, low- and middle-income countries. The global burden of malignancy has significant economic and social impact on societies. Treatment of cancer is still in large primarily based on radio- and chemotherapy. Novel methods, like checkpoint inhibitors and cancer immunotherapy, especially in the light of FDA clearance of the first CAR T-cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel—Kymriah) for certain population of children and adults with advanced leukemia, paved the road to further research in this direction. Although this new methods may appear as game-changing treatment, the side effects may be multiple and potentially very serious. This type of therapy is also connected with significant and, in many cases prohibitive, treatment expenses leading to so called ‘financial toxicity’. For these reasons, there is a great need for good alternatives to existing therapies.
Another considerable issue associated with cancer treatment is drug resistance. Cancer chemotherapy has become increasingly complex; still, the cure ratio is not satisfactory. Resistance to treatment may result from a variety of factors, individual genetic variations in patients and in tumor cells, even those from the same tissue of origin, and acquired resistance which has also become more prevalent. The most common mechanism for acquisition of resistance is expression of energy-dependent transporters that detect and expel anticancer drugs from cells. This process takes place with the participation of ATP-dependent transporters. ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of membrane proteins, characterized by homologous ATP-binding, and large, spanning transmembrane domains [1,2,3,4].
Lack of sensitivity to drug-induced apoptosis and induction of drug-neutralizing mechanisms may also play a role in anticancer drug resistance. Xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes usually mediate detoxification but can also form reactive intermediates causing toxicity. Cytochrome P450s acts in the phase I with CYP1, CYP2, CYP3, and CYP4 families dominant in the process of xenobiotic metabolism. Phase II metabolism is governed by glutathione S-transferases, Uridine 5′-diphospho(UDP)-glucuronosyltransferases, sulfotransferases, N-acetyltransferases, and epoxide hydrolases, producing excretable hydrophilic metabolites. Transporters in the liver and intestine remove lipophilic compounds and metabolites from cells [5]. In addition, reduced apoptosis, DNA damage repair mechanisms, and altered drug metabolism may lead to drug resistance as well [6,7].
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a malignancy of lymphoid progenitor cells. ALL affects both children and adults. Childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is curable with chemotherapy in approximately 90% of patients. The precise mechanisms of pathogenesis associated with ALL are not known. Only less than 5% of ALL cases are associated with inherited syndromes like, Down syndrome, Bloom’s syndrome, ataxia telangiectasia, Klinefelter syndrome, or Nijmegen syndrome. Other contributors are ionizing radiation, exposures to certain chemicals, and certain viral infections. Acute lymphocytic leukemia is more common in whites than in African Americans, but the reasons for this are not clear [8,9].
Before the introduction of the vitamin A derivative all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) was considered as one of the most fatal forms of acute leukemia associated with poor outcomes. With ATRA treatment and subsequently administering it in combination with anthracyclines, and arsenic trioxide (ATO) regimens, complete remission reached 90% and cure rates 80%. APL is characterized by balanced chromosomal reciprocal translocation t(15:17), which results in the fusion between promyelocytic leukemia (PML) gene and retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) gene. Of all types of AMLs, APL has the biggest ratio of curability. Significant incidence of early death in APL is associated with bleeding diathesis [10,11].
The search for alternative anti-cancer drugs derived from natural sources is still considered as one of the priorities in cancer therapy, bearing in mind rapid development of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and high toxicity with sometimes deleterious side effects.
Diet rich in fruit and vegetables has been proven to ameliorate and prevent some of the modern diseases. Antioxidants in fruits and vegetables provide a considerable benefit in reducing disease incidence. Cancer specific cytotoxicity have been reported with the use of flavonoids and stilbenes. Stilbenes are compounds of low molecular weight (210–270 g/mol) which occur in plants naturally, thought to be protective against germs, viruses, and negative effects of ultraviolet radiation. Trans-isomers belong to most often isolated forms of stilbenes. Stilbenes exhibit cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory, and chemopreventive properties with cytotoxic effects on tumor cells [12,13].
The best-known and first isolated compound of the stilbene group is t-resveratrol (3,4′,5′-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene) (Figure 1 (1)), found in red wine, grape skins, peanuts, mulberry tree, berries, and other medicinal plants [12,14,15,16,17]. It exerts complex effect on cell cycle, increasing the expression of p53 protein, inducing apoptosis, inhibiting DNA synthesis by stopping cell cycle in S phase, and reducing the risk of mutation [18,19,20].
Piceatannol (trans-3,4,3′,5′-tertahydroksystilben) (Figure 1 (2)) is a derivative of t-resveratrol produced in human cells by metabolism of t-resveratrol by cytochrome P450 (isozymes CYP1A1, CYP1A2) [21]. Piceatannol was first isolated from Euphorbia lagascae in 1984. It is synthesized from t-resveratrol as a result of an infection with fungi, bacteria, and during exposure to UV radiation [22]. It occurs naturally in peanuts, the skin of grapes, sugarcane, rhubarb, and berries [23,24,25]. Piceatannol exhibits cytotoxic (antiproliferative) and antioxidant activity [26]
Pterostilbene (trans-3,5-dimethoxy-4′-hydroxystilbene) (Figure 1(3)) occurs in the skin of grapes and blueberries. Pterostilbene shows antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor, antifungal and chemo-preventive activity (CYP1A1 isoenzyme inhibition of cytochrome P450) [12,17,27].
Rhaponticin (3,5,3′-trihydroxy-4′-methoxystilbene 3-O-beta-d-glucoside) (Figure 1 (4)) and deoxyrhaponticin (3,5-Dihydroxy-4′-methoxystilbene-3-O-beta-d-glucoside) (Figure 1 (5)) were isolated from a plant of genus Rheum L. It shows antitumor, antithrombotic, antioxidant, and vasorelaxant activity [28,29].
The present study was designed to analyze the effects of stilbene derivatives on drug resistant human leukemic cells. The aim of this work was to evaluate the apoptotic effect of stilbene derivatives in various concentrations on leukemic cells (LC) with and without resistant phenotype using FlowSight Imaging Flow Cytometer.

2. Results

A conventional trypan blue assay was used to evaluate the effect of stilbene derivatives on the viability of HL60, HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, CEM/C1, and CCRF-CEM leukemia cell lines. Trypan blue selectively stained dead cells that lost the integrity of the cell membrane. Incubation with all stilbene derivatives reduced cell viability compared with non-exposed cells in a concentration dependent manner (Figure 2).
Based on the constructed dose–response curves (Figure 2) IC50 doses were calculated for each compound against tested cell lines (Table 1). The obtained values varied depending on the cell line and stilbene derivative tested, and ranged from 4.57 µM for CCRF-CEM cell line exposed to piceatannol to 54.09 µM for HL60 cell line exposed to resveratrol.
The most effective cytotoxic activity was observed for PTER and PIC on both ALL and APL cell lines, while RES and D-RHAP showed lowered activity (Table 1). It was noted that cells of the CCRF-CEM line (non-resistant) are more sensitive to the effects of the stilbene derivatives tested compared to CEM/C1 cells (with a resistance phenotype). This effect was not observed in the case of cytotoxic activity of the studied stilbene derivatives on the HL60 line and its resistant derivatives HL60/MX1 and HL60/MX2.
The analysis of constructed dose–response curves presenting the cell viability in relation to the concentrations of stilbene derivatives revealed that after initial decrease, some stilbene derivatives, at certain concentration, induced increased cell viability.
This phenomenon was observed after HL60 and HL60/MX2 cell lines were treated with piceatannol at 10–20 µM concentration, CEM/C1 cell line exposed to t-resveratrol at 20–40 µM concentration, CEM/C1 cell line exposed to pterostilbene at 20–30 µM concentration and HL60/MX2 cell line treated with deoxyrhaponticin at 30–40 µM concentration.
To evaluate apoptosis, flow cytometry with imaging in real time was used. This method gives us an opportunity to observe cells in real time. The analysis was performed using Annexin-V-FITC, PhiPhiLux-G1D2 (caspase-3-FITC antibody), and propidium iodide (PI). FlowSight cytometer enables analysis of cell morphology, the instrument saves images of each cell, allowing for detection of specific morphological changes of the investigated process. Altered cell morphology was confirmed by investigating changes in cell biochemistry.
Caspase-3 is mainly an apoptosis marker. This protein is involved in activation cascade of caspases responsible for execution of apoptosis. These proteinases have been described as factors participating in apoptotic DNA fragmentation and other morphological and biochemical changes in apoptosis [30]. Annexin V binds to phosphatidylserine (PS) in the cell membrane. In normal, live cells, PS is found in the intracellular side of the membrane. During apoptosis, PS is moved to the extracellular side of the membrane which can be marked using annexin V [31]. Propidium iodide is the dye attaching to the DNA of a dead cell, showing the loss of integrity of the cellular membrane. Loss of membrane integrity occurs both, in apoptosis (late phase of this process) and necrosis.
Four populations of cells present in all tested samples were analyzed by cytometry. Population 1—viable cells which tested negative for annexin V and PI (Figure 3, line A; lower left quadrants on dot plots in Figure 4, column 3, line A and C) and also negative for Caspase-3 and PI (Figure 3, line E; lower left quadrants at dot plots in Figure 4 and Figure 5, column 3, line B and D).
Population 2—early-apoptotic cells, annexin V positive and PI negative (Figure 3, line B; lower right quadrant, cytogram Figure 4 and Figure 5, column 3, line A and C) and Caspase-3 positive and PI negative (Figure 3, line F; lower right quadrant at dot plot Figure 4, column 3, line B and D).
Population 3—late-apoptotic cells testing positive for both annexin V and PI (Figure 3, line C; upper right quadrant, cytogram Figure 4, columns 3, line A and C) and also cells positive for Caspase-3 and PI (seen in Figure 3, line G; upper right quadrant at dot plot Figure 4 and Figure 5, column 3, line B and D).
Population 4—necrotic cells testing positive only for PI (seen in Figure 3, lines D and H; upper left quadrant at dot plot Figure 4 and Figure 5, columns 3, lines A, B, C, D).
Caspase-3 positive cell populations were observed in all cell lines exposed to stilbene derivatives. The lowest percentage of caspase-3 positive cells was observed in CCRF-CEM cell line exposed to rhaponticin (10.07%), HL60 line exposed to deoxyrhaponticin and mitoxantrone (60.82%), HL60/MX1 exposed to rhaponticin (33.70%), HL60/MX2 exposed to rhaponticin (50.3%), and CEM/C1 exposed to rhaponticin and mitoxantrone (85.5%). The highest percentage of caspase-3 positive populations was observed in the CEM/C1 cell line exposed to t-resveratrol, piceatannol, and pterostilbene. A substantial percentage of caspase-3 positive populations was also observed in HL60/MX1 line exposed to t-resveratrol and pterostilbene, HL60 line exposed to t-resveratrol and piceatannol, HL60/MX2 line exposed to t-resveratrol and pterostilbene. CCRF-CEM cell line showed the highest resistance (the lowest sensitivity) against tested stilbene derivatives (Figure 6). We have found that the IC50 doses for CCRF-CEM cells is low compared to the other cell lines tested, while the number of caspase-3 positive cells is relatively low. In our opinion, this may be due to the high sensitivity of CCRF-CEM cells to the cytotoxic effect of the stilbene derivatives tested, but the induction of the apoptosis process occurs with the participation of another mechanism. An additional explanation for this phenomenon may be a low dose of IC50, resulting in a low concentration of stilbene derivatives in the cells, not leading to the induction of apoptosis at the same rate as in the other cell lines.
The comparison of caspase-3 positive cells, detected in two parallel experiments (stilbene vs. stilbene + mitoxantrone) showed that the percentage of caspase-3 positive cells vary. Comparing cells exposed to the stilbene derivative with those exposed to the stilbene derivative with mitoxantrone, there was a significant reduction in the number of apoptotic cells in HL60 cells exposed to deoxyrhaponticin and in CCRF-CEM lines exposed to resveratrol. This phenomenon can be explained by mitoxantrone-activated MDR in tumor cells. In the case of CCRF-CEM cells exposed to rapontycin, a significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells was observed after the addition of mitoxantrone. The remaining samples showed no significant differences (Figure 6).
At the same time, the percentage of cells showing positive detection of annexin V were increased or without significant changes. A significant increase in the number of apoptotic cells in samples exposed to stilbene derivatives and mitoxantrone in comparison to cells exposed only to the stilbene derivative was observed in the case of: rhaponticin in HL60, HL60/MX1, and CCRF-CEM cells; piceatannol and pterostilbene in HL60 cells; resveratrol and deoxyrhaponticin in CCRF-CEM cells. The remaining samples showed no significant changes (Figure 7).
To our knowledge, this is a first published report which presents induction of apoptosis after exposure to rhaponticin (in the presence and absence of mitoxantrone) in HL60, HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, CCRF-CEM cell lines, deoxyrhaponticin (in the presence and absence of mitoxantrone) in CCRF-CEM and HL60/MX1 cell lines, piceatannol (in the presence and absence of mitoxantrone) in HL60/MX2 cell line, pterostilbene (in the presence and absence of mitoxantrone) in HL60/MX2 which may show a tendency of inhibiting MDR.
The highest percentage of caspase-3 negative/propidium iodide positive necrotic cells was observed in HL60/MX1, CEM/C1 cell lines exposed to rhaponticin; in HL60 cell line exposed to rhaponticin with mitoxantrone; in HL60, HL60/MX2, CCRF-CEM exposed to piceatannol and in HL60/MX2 cell line exposed to piceatannol with mitoxantrone (Figure 6).
The highest percentage of annexin V negative/propidium iodide positive necrotic cells was observed in HL60/MX1 cell lines exposed to rhaponticin with mitoxantrone, in HL60 cell line exposed to rhaponticin with and without mitoxantrone, in HL60/MX2 exposed to deoxyrhaponticin with and without mitoxantrone (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

Plant derivatives (paclitaxel, vinblastine, vinorelbine, vincristine, isothiocyanates, and podophyllotoxin) have been used to treat cancerous diseases for a long time. Naturally occurring stilbenes have attracted the attention of researchers due to extensive and variable biological activity of this group of compounds. Many synthetic derivatives have been developed as well. Antitumor activity of stilbene derivatives has been shown in vitro in many cell lines. The induction of apoptosis in cancer cells by stilbene derivatives is well-documented [17,26,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Stilbene derivatives have been shown to have antitumor activity due to several mechanisms. They are best known for resveratrol and include: ERK1/2 activation, depolarization of the mitchondrial membrane, caspase-3 activation, cell cycle inhibition at the G2/S stage, and inhibition of protein kinase C activity [40,44,45].
In our research, we evaluated stilbene derivatives as a potential antitumor agents and multi-drug resistance modulators. Our results confirmed that RES, PIC, PTER, RHAP, and D-RHAP exhibit antitumor activity, manifested by the induction of apoptosis. It has been already suggested that high concentration of polyphenols (e.g., stilbenes) can induce effective apoptosis [36]. Our studies pointed to specific concentrations of stilbene derivatives which may have an impact on the inhibition of multidrug resistance phenomenon.
IC50 doses differ between the cells of the tested lines. CCRF-CEM cells are more sensitive to the effects of the stilbene derivatives tested than the CEM/C1 cells, which are MDR derivatives of the mentioned CCRF-CEM line. This phenomenon was not observed in the case of HL60 cells and its HL60/MX1 and HL60/MX2 derivatives with the MDR phenotype. The cause of these differences can be explained by another type of leukemia from which the mentioned lines originate.
RES has been reported to possess antioxidant activity. What is more remarkable, it also inhibits tumors cells cycle phases by interacting with several cellular targets. Some authors reported RES inducing apoptosis in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia MOLT-4 cells [37], human monocytic leukemia cell line THP-1 [38], and isolated from patients human B-cells chronic leukaemia cell lines [39]. Opydo-Chanek et al. found that RES and ABT-737 lead to massive apoptosis in MOLT-4 cells [41]. Dörrie et al. found RES-induced apoptosis by depolarizing mitochondrial membranes and activating caspase-3 in human pro-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines SD, RS4-11, MV4-11, human pre-b leukemia cell lines REH, Nalm-6, and human T-cell leukemia cell lines Jurkat and CEM [40].
It has been shown that dose-dependent PTER induces apoptosis in HL60 cell at concentrations similar to those used in our investigation [32,33,42,43]. Furthermore, our research confirmed that, PTER induces apoptosis in MOLT 4 [43], MV4-11, U937, and THP-1 human leukemia cell lines [32].
PIC was reported as a selective protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitor [46]. PIC leads to cell death via apoptosis of lymphoma cell line BJAB [26] at doses similar to those used in our study. PIC was also reported to induce apoptosis in human monocytic leukemia cells (THP-1 and U937) and human acute myeloblastic cells (HL60) in combination with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) [34].
There are not many studies of apoptotic activity of D-RHAP and RHAP in leukemia cell lines. Our results showed unequivocally that D-RHAP and RHAP lead to massive apoptosis in investigated leukemia cell lines (Figure 6 and Figure 7). We also presented data showing stilbene derivatives inducing apoptosis in cell lines with MDR phenotype, a mechanism which also has not been studied extensively.
Among the compounds of natural origin with anticancer activity, flavonoids are mentioned [47]. For example, IC50 doses determined for quercetin in relation to HL60 lines are in the range of 20–30 μM [48]. The quercetin antitumor mechanisms are inhibition of the cell cycle at G2/M or depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane [49].
Coumarins also show anticancer activity [50]. IC50 doses of compounds belonging to the coumarin group are in the following ranges: 15–30 μM for CEM/C1 cells, 10–35 μM for CCRF-CEM cells, 8–60 μM for HL60 cells, 16–70 μM for cell lines HL60/MX2, 20–42 μM for cells of the HL60/MX2 line [51].
Another interesting group of natural compounds with proven antitumor activity are isothiocyanates. This activity consists in inducing the process of apoptosis, inhibiting the cell cycle, or changing the activity of transcription factors like NF-κB or AP-1 [35]. The IC50 doses of isothiocyabates determined for the HL60/S line are in the range of 1–4 μM [52], whereas those for the lines with the HL60/ADR and HL60/VCR resistance phenotype are in the 1–10 μM range [53].
Stilbene derivatives are compounds believed to be safe for human consumption [12,54]. Piceatannol and resveratrol show good distribution in tissues, as evidenced by studies in rats, mice, and dogs [54]. Pterostilbene and resveratrol are rapidly absorbed, metabolized (mainly by conjugation with glucuronic acid and sulphate) and excreted in the urine. Pterostilbene has been shown to have stronger pharmacological effects due to its increased stability (due to the difference in structure between pterostilbene and resveratrol–pterostilben has only one hydroxyl group). Attention is paid to the role of intestinal microflora in the level of metabolism of stilbene derivatives in the human body, which is associated with the biotransformation of certain amounts of stilbene derivatives in the lumen of the human intestine by the bacteria present there. Stilbene derivatives are compounds that can potentially be used in treatment, but many studies still need to be carried out in order to better investigate the pharmacokinetics of these compounds and to determine the best route and form of administration [55].
Taken together, our date confirms that t-resveratrol; rhaponticin, deoxyrhaponticin, piceatannol, and pterostilbene have cytotoxic activity and induce apoptosis in HL60, HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, CCRF-CEM, and CEM/C1 cells lines with and without resistant phenotype. Our study also brings new elements to exploration of stilbene derivatives effect on cancer cells and paves the road to more extensive investigation of this promising direction in alternative cancer treatment options. Among the possibilities of improving the effectiveness of stilbene derivatives therapy, one should mention the possibility of their modification through the creation of new derivatives using stilbene backbone for synthesis [56,57,58]. In addition, new techniques for the administration of active compounds, for example liposomes created using nanotechnology methods, are promising [59].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Stilbene Derivatives

t-Resveratrol (RES), deoxyrhaponticin (D-RHAP), rhaponticin (RHAP), pterostilbene (PTER), and piceatannol (PIC) (Sigma Company, St. Louis, MO, USA) were dissolved in 80% ethanol (Sigma) and their 10 mM concentrations stored at 4 °C.

4.2. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human acute promyelocytic leukemia cell lines: HL60, HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells: CEM/C1 and CCRF-CEM were used in this study. Cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 10801, University Boulevard, Manassas, VA 20110, USA.
HL-60 is a promyelocytic cell line derived by S.J. Collins. The peripheral blood leukocytes were obtained by leukopheresis from a 36-year-old Caucasian female with acute promyelocytic leukemia [60]. HL-60/MX1, a mitoxantrone resistant derivative of the HL-60 cell line was obtained from the peripheral blood leukocytes acquired by leukopheresis also from a patient with acute promyelocytic leukemia. HL-60/MX2 is a mitoxantrone resistant derivative of the HL-60 cell line too. HL-60/MX2 cells display atypical multidrug resistance (MDR) with the absence of P-glycoprotein overexpression and altered topoisomerase II catalytic activity including reduced levels of topoisomerase II alpha and beta proteins. CCRF-CEM was derived from human lymphoblasts of the peripheral blood from a child with acute leukemia. CEM/C1 is a camptothecin (CPT) resistant derivative of the human T cell leukemia cell line CCRF-CEM. The cell line was selected and subcloned in 1991 for resistance to CPT. The cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (PAA Laboratories, Linz Austria), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (PAA Laboratories) for HL60/MX1, HL60/MX2, CEM/C1, CCRF-CEM cell lines, and 20% FBS for HL60 cells, penicillin-streptomycin (100U/mL PAA Laboratories) and amphotericin (PAA Laboratories) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2.

4.3. Analysis of Cell Viability

Cells were seeded on 12-well plates (Sarstedt, Wr. Neudorf, Austria) at an initial density of 1 × 106 cells/mL. After 24 h, the cell suspension was stimulated with stilbenes derivatives at concentrations ranging from 10 µM to 1000 µM. After 48 h, 1 mL of cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were then resuspended in 50 µL phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (PAA Laboratories). From each tube a 10 µL-cell suspension was taken. To each tube 10 µL of Trypan blue reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was added and the sample was incubated for 5 min. Cell viability was measured by Trypan blue assay. Exclusion assay was performed on TC20 Automated Cell Counter (Bio-Rad). Each experiment was repeated three times.

4.4. Leukemic Cells Preparation

The cell samples at 1 × 106 cells/ml density were seeded on 12-well plates. After 24 h, cell lines were treated with stilbene derivatives at the dose of IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration). All samples were treated with both stilbene derivatives and mitoxantrone at 20 µM concentration. After 24 h cytometric analysis was performed.

4.5. Annexin V-FITC/PI Assay

Cell samples were collected from each well, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells were resuspended in 50 µL PBS and 50 µL of buffer containing 1 µL annexin V (AnxV), 1 µL propidium iodide (PI) was added and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. Annexin-V-Fluos Staining Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria) containing annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) was purchased from Roche. The samples underwent flow cytometric analysis by FlowSight Imaging Flow Cytometer (Amnis, USA) using 488 nm laser. Each experiment was repeated three times.

4.6. PhiPhiLux-G1D2/PI Assay

The cells from each well were collected, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant discarded. Then they were resuspended in 750 µL of PBS, centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant discarded. The cells were resuspended in 20 µL PhiPhiLux G1D2 containing Caspase3-FITC antibody (OncoImmunin, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and 1 µL of PI was added. Thus prepared samples were incubated for 60 min at 37 °C. To each tube 1000 µL of binding buffer was added, the samples were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and the supernatant discarded. The samples were analyzed by flow cytometry using FlowSight Imaging Flow Cytometer (Amnis, USA) with 488 nm laser. Each experiment was repeated three times.

4.7. FlowSight Cytometric Analysis

The experiments were performed using the FlowSight Imaging Flow Cytometer (Amnis, Seattle, WA, USA) with visualization in real time. The instrument operates as a conventional cytometer but also provides images of every cell tested acting like a fluorescent and inverted microscope. FlowSight is equipped with 488 nm, 658 nm, and 785 nm lasers. In our experiments 488 nm laser was used. At minimum 10,000 cells were measured. Apoptosis analysis was done using Inspire for the FlowSight v.100.2.256.0 flow cytometry analysis software (Amnis). Analysis of apoptosis was performed using Ideas Application v6.0 (Amnis). As a first step, isolated cells were gated on the histogram displaying Channel 1 (BF) Gradient RMS. Next, single cells were gated on dot plot Channel 1 (BF) Area (X) and compared to Channel 1 (BF) Intensity (Y) to exclude aggregated cells. Finally, apoptosis was evaluated on dot plot Channel 2 (X) (green fluorescence, emission range 480–560 nm) referred to Channel 4 (Y) (orange fluorescence, emission range 595–660 nm). Cells without any staining were used as a negative control and there was isotype control applied. Compensation was performed using single stained samples. In our research, FMO (fluorescence minus one) samples were used to determine the gating.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistica software v.12.5 (StatSoft, Krakow, Poland) and GraphPad (v.7, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was accomplished using the one-way Anova with Tukey post-hoc test. Results were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Data were expressed as mean with standard deviation (SD).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C. and A.B.-K.; Data curation, M.C.; Formal analysis, M.C.; Funding acquisition, A.B.-K. and J.K.; Investigation, M.C., A.B.-K., T.K., K.K.-C., and J.W.; Methodology, M.C., A.B.-K., and J.K.; Project administration, A.B.-K.; Supervision, A.B.-K. and J.K.; Validation, A.B.-K. and J.K.; Visualization, M.C.; Writing—original draft, M.C.; Writing—review & editing, A.B.-K., A.M.-K., D.G., T.K., and J.K..

Funding

This research was funded by the Polish National Science Centre (NN 405162 639 –ABK). The paper was developed using the equipment purchased within the Project “The equipment of innovative laboratories doing research on new medicines used in the therapy of civilization and neoplastic diseases” within the Operational Program Development of Eastern Poland 2007–2013, Priority Axis I Modern Economy, Operations I.3 Innovation Promotion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Efferth, T.; Volm, M. Multiple resistance to carcinogens and xenobiotics: P-glycoproteins as universal detoxifiers. Arch. Toxicol. 2017, 91, 2515–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Z.; Shi, T.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, P.; Deng, M.; Huang, C.; Hu, T.; Jiang, L.; Li, J. Mammalian drug efflux transporters of the ATP binding cassette (ABC) family in multidrug resistance: A review of the past decade. Cancer Lett. 2016, 370, 153–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. López-Marqués, R.L.; Poulsen, L.R.; Bailly, A.; Geisler, M.; Pomorski, T.G.; Palmgren, M.G. Structure and mechanism of ATP-dependent phospholipid transporters. Biochim. Biophys. Acta󒀔Gen. Subj. 2015, 1850, 461–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Fletcher, J.I.; Williams, R.T.; Henderson, M.J.; Norris, M.D.; Haber, M. ABC transporters as mediators of drug resistance and contributors to cancer cell biology. Drug Resist. Updat. 2016, 26, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Senthilkumar, R.; CHEN, B.-A.; CAI, X.-H.; FU, R. Anticancer and multidrug-resistance reversing potential of traditional medicinal plants and their bioactive compounds in leukemia cell lines. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2014, 12, 881–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, C.-P.; Calcagno, A.M.; Ambudkar, S. V Reversal of ABC drug transporter-mediated multidrug resistance in cancer cells: evaluation of current strategies. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2008, 1, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gillet, J.-P.; Gottesman, M.M. Mechanisms of Multidrug Resistance in Cancer. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.); Zhou, J., Ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2010; Volume 596, pp. 47–76. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pui, C.-H.; Robison, L.L.; Look, A.T. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet 2008, 371, 1030–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Inaba, H.; Greaves, M.; Mullighan, C.G. Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet 2013, 381, 1943–1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, Z.-Y.; Chen, Z. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: from highly fatal to highly curable. Blood 2008, 111, 2505–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Park, J.H.; Qiao, B.; Panageas, K.S.; Schymura, M.J.; Jurcic, J.G.; Rosenblat, T.L.; Altman, J.K.; Douer, D.; Rowe, J.M.; Tallman, M.S. Early death rate in acute promyelocytic leukemia remains high despite all-trans retinoic acid. Blood 2011, 118, 1248–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Roupe, K.A.; Remsberg, C.M.; Yáñez, J.A.; Davies, N.M. Pharmacometrics of stilbenes: seguing towards the clinic. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2006, 1, 81–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chong, J.; Poutaraud, A.; Hugueney, P. Metabolism and roles of stilbenes in plants. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Signorelli, P.; Ghidoni, R. Resveratrol as an anticancer nutrient: Molecular basis, open questions and promises. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2005, 16, 449–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ferreira, M.-J.U.; Duarte, N.; Gyémánt, N.; Radics, R.; Cherepnev, G.; Varga, A.; Molnár, J. Interaction between doxorubicin and the resistance modifier stilbene on multidrug resistant mouse lymphoma and human breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26, 3541–3546. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ruiz, B.R.; Hernández, S.P. Cancer chemoprevention by dietary phytochemicals: Epidemiological evidence. Maturitas 2016, 94, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsai, H.-Y.; Ho, C.-T.; Chen, Y.-K. Biological actions and molecular effects of resveratrol, pterostilbene, and 3′-hydroxypterostilbene. J. food drug Anal. 2017, 25, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Varoni, E.M.; Lo Faro, A.F.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Iriti, M. Anticancer Molecular Mechanisms of Resveratrol. Front. Nutr. 2016, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Estrov, Z.; Shishodia, S.; Faderl, S.; Harris, D.; Van, Q.; Kantarjian, H.M.; Talpaz, M.; Aggarwal, B.B. Resveratrol blocks interleukin-1beta-induced activation of the nuclear transcription factor NF-kappaB, inhibits proliferation, causes S-phase arrest, and induces apoptosis of acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood 2003, 102, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, C.K.; Ndiaye, M.A.; Ahmad, N. Resveratrol and cancer: Challenges for clinical translation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Basis Dis. 2015, 1852, 1178–1185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Piver, B.; Fer, M.; Vitrac, X.; Merillon, J.-M.; Dreano, Y.; Berthou, F.; Lucas, D. Involvement of cytochrome P450 1A2 in the biotransformation of trans-resveratrol in human liver microsomes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 68, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bavaresco, L.; Vezzulli, S.; Battilani, P.; Giorni, P.; Pietri, A.; Bertuzzi, T. Effect of Ochratoxin A-Producing Aspergilli on Stilbenic Phytoalexin Synthesis in Grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 6151–6157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rimando, A.M.; Kalt, W.; Magee, J.B.; Dewey, J.; Ballington, J.R. Resveratrol, Pterostilbene, and Piceatannol in Vaccinium Berries. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 4713–4719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brinker, A.M.; Seigler, D.S. Isolation and identification of piceatannol as a phytoalexin from sugarcane. Phytochemistry 1991, 30, 3229–3232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cantos, E.; Espín, J.C.; Fernández, M.J.; Oliva, J.; Tomás-Barberán, F.A. Postharvest UV-C-Irradiated Grapes as a Potential Source for Producing Stilbene-Enriched Red Wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wieder, T.; Prokop, A.; Bagci, B.; Essmann, F.; Bernicke, D.; Schulze-Osthoff, K.; Dörken, B.; Schmalz, H.G.; Daniel, P.T.; Henze, G. Piceatannol, a hydroxylated analog of the chemopreventive agent resveratrol, is a potent inducer of apoptosis in the lymphoma cell line BJAB and in primary, leukemic lymphoblasts. Leukemia 2001, 15, 1735–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Remsberg, C.M.; Yáñez, J.A.; Ohgami, Y.; Vega-Villa, K.R.; Rimando, A.M.; Davies, N.M. Pharmacometrics of pterostilbene: preclinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism, anticancer, antiinflammatory, antioxidant and analgesic activity. Phyther. Res. 2008, 22, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liang, X.; Sun, Y.; Zeng, W.; Liu, L.; Ma, X.; Zhao, Y.; Fan, J. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a folate-targeted rhaponticin conjugate. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2013, 21, 178–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, P.; Tian, W.; Wang, X.; Ma, X. Inhibitory effect of desoxyrhaponticin and rhaponticin, two natural stilbene glycosides from the Tibetan nutritional food Rheum tanguticum Maxim. ex Balf., on fatty acid synthase and human breast cancer cells. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Portt, L.; Norman, G.; Clapp, C.; Greenwood, M.; Greenwood, M.T. Anti-apoptosis and cell survival: A review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Res. 2011, 1813, 238–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Van Engeland, M.; Nieland, L.J.W.; Ramaekers, F.C.S.; Schutte, B.; Reutelingsperger, C.P.M. Annexin V-affinity assay: A review on an apoptosis detection system based on phosphatidylserine exposure. Cytometry 1998, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hsiao, P.-C.; Chou, Y.-E.; Tan, P.; Lee, W.-J.; Yang, S.-F.; Chow, J.-M.; Chen, H.-Y.; Lin, C.-H.; Lee, L.-M.; Chien, M.-H. Pterostilbene Simultaneously Induced G0/G1-Phase Arrest and MAPK-Mediated Mitochondrial-Derived Apoptosis in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines. PLoS One 2014, 9, e105342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Kang, J.H.; Park, Y.H.; Choi, S.W.; Yang, E.K.; Lee, W.J. Resveratrol derivatives potently induce apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 2003, 35, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kang, C.-H.; Moon, D.-O.; Choi, Y.H.; Choi, I.-W.; Moon, S.-K.; Kim, W.-J.; Kim, G.-Y. Piceatannol enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in human leukemia THP-1 cells through Sp1- and ERK-dependent DR5 up-regulation. Toxicol. Vitr. 2011, 25, 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Keum, Y.-S.; Jeong, W.-S.; Tony Kong, A.N. Chemoprevention by isothiocyanates and their underlying molecular signaling mechanisms. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2004, 555, 191–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Filomeni, G.; Graziani, I.; Rotilio, G.; Ciriolo, M.R. trans-Resveratrol induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells MCF-7 by the activation of MAP kinases pathways. Genes Nutr. 2007, 2, 295–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Cecchinato, V.; Chiaramonte, R.; Nizzardo, M.; Cristofaro, B.; Basile, A.; Sherbet, G.V.; Comi, P. Resveratrol-induced apoptosis in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia MOLT-4 cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2007, 74, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Tsan, M.F.; White, J.E.; Maheshwari, J.G.; Bremner, T.A.; Sacco, J. Resveratrol induces Fas signalling-independent apoptosis in THP-1 human monocytic leukaemia cells. Br. J. Haematol. 2000, 109, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Roman, V.; Billard, C.; Kern, C.; Ferry-Dumazet, H.; Izard, J.-C.; Mohammad, R.; Mossalayi, D.M.; Kolb, J.-P. Analysis of resveratrol-induced apoptosis in human B-cell chronic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 2002, 117, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Dörrie, J.; Gerauer, H.; Wachter, Y.; Zunino, S.J. Resveratrol induces extensive apoptosis by depolarizing mitochondrial membranes and activating caspase-9 in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4731–4739. [Google Scholar]
  41. Opydo-Chanek, M.; Rak, A.; Cierniak, A.; Mazur, L. Combination of ABT-737 and resveratrol enhances DNA damage and apoptosis in human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia MOLT-4 cells. Toxicol. Vitr. 2017, 42, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tolomeo, M.; Grimaudo, S.; Di Cristina, A.; Roberti, M.; Pizzirani, D.; Meli, M.; Dusonchet, L.; Gebbia, N.; Abbadessa, V.; Crosta, L.; et al. Pterostilbene and 3′-hydroxypterostilbene are effective apoptosis-inducing agents in MDR and BCR-ABL-expressing leukemia cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 1709–1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Siedlecka-Kroplewska, K.; Jozwik, A.; Kaszubowska, L.; Kowalczyk, A.; Boguslawski, W. Pterostilbene induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MOLT4 human leukemia cells. Folia Histochem. Cytobiol. 2012, 50, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. De Filippis, B.; Ammazzalorso, A.; Fantacuzzi, M.; Giampietro, L.; Maccallini, C.; Amoroso, R. Anticancer Activity of Stilbene-Based Derivatives. ChemMedChem 2017, 12, 558–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Chowdhury, S.A.; Kishino, K.; Satoh, R.; Hashimoto, K.; Kikuchi, H.; Nishikawa, H.; Shirataki, Y.; Sakagami, H. Tumor-specificity and apoptosis-inducing activity of stilbenes and flavonoids. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 2055–2063. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Wang, B.H.; Lu, Z.X.; Polya, G.M. Inhibition of eukaryote serine/threonine-specific protein kinases by piceatannol. Planta Med. 1998, 64, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ren, W.; Qiao, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, L. Flavonoids: Promising anticancer agents. Med. Res. Rev. 2003, 23, 519–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kang, T.; Liang, N. Studies on the inhibitory effects of quercetin on the growth of HL-60 leukemia cells. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997, 54, 1013–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dajas, F. Life or death: Neuroprotective and anticancer effects of quercetin. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 143, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kubrak, T.; Podgórski, R.; Stompor, M. Natural and Synthetic Coumarins and their Pharmacological Activity. Eur. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2017, 15, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kubrak, T.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Komsta, Ł.; Załuski, D.; Bogucki, J.; Galkowski, D.; Kaczmarczyk, R.; Feldo, M.; Cioch, M.; Kocki, J. Modulation of Multidrug Resistance Gene Expression by Coumarin Derivatives in Human Leukemic Cells. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 5647281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, Y.; Tang, L.; Gonzalez, V. Selected isothiocyanates rapidly induce growth inhibition of cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Jakubikova, J.; Bao, Y.; Sedlak, J. Isothiocyanates induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and mitochondrial potential depolarization in HL-60 and multidrug-resistant cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 3375–3386. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Roupe, K.A.; Yáñez, J.A.; Teng, X.W.; Davies, N.M. Pharmacokinetics of selected stilbenes: rhapontigenin, piceatannol and pinosylvin in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wang, P.; Sang, S. Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of resveratrol and pterostilbene. BioFactors 2018, 44, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vervandier-Fasseur, D.; Vang, O.; Latruffe, N. Special Issue: Improvements for Resveratrol Efficacy. Molecules 2017, 22, 1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. He, H.; Ge, Y.; Dai, H.; Cui, S.; Ye, F.; Jin, J.; Shi, Y.; He, H.; Ge, Y.; Dai, H.; et al. Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Stilbene Derivatives as Novel Inhibitors of Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase 1B. Molecules 2016, 21, 1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chalal, M.; Delmas, D.; Meunier, P.; Latruffe, N.; Vervandier-Fasseur, D.; Chalal, M.; Delmas, D.; Meunier, P.; Latruffe, N.; Vervandier-Fasseur, D. Inhibition of Cancer Derived Cell Lines Proliferation by Synthesized Hydroxylated Stilbenes and New Ferrocenyl-Stilbene Analogs. Comparison with Resveratrol. Molecules 2014, 19, 7850–7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pentek, T.; Newenhouse, E.; O’Brien, B.; Chauhan, A.S. Development of a Topical Resveratrol Formulation for Commercial Applications Using Dendrimer Nanotechnology. Molecules 2017, 22, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Collins, S.J. The HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cell line: proliferation, differentiation, and cellular oncogene expression. Blood 1987, 70, 1233–1244. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 24 01896 g001 550
Figure 1. Structural formulas of the stilbene derivatives tested (1-t-Resveratrol, 2-Piceattanol, 3-Pterostilbene, 4-Rhapontycin, 5-Deoxyrhaponticin).
Figure 1. Structural formulas of the stilbene derivatives tested (1-t-Resveratrol, 2-Piceattanol, 3-Pterostilbene, 4-Rhapontycin, 5-Deoxyrhaponticin).
Molecules 24 01896 g001
Molecules 24 01896 g002 550
Figure 2. Cell viability analysis of tested stilbene derivatives from conventional trypan blue assay. Each value is shown as mean with standard deviation (SD).
Figure 2. Cell viability analysis of tested stilbene derivatives from conventional trypan blue assay. Each value is shown as mean with standard deviation (SD).
Molecules 24 01896 g002
Molecules 24 01896 g003 550
Figure 3. Results of FlowSight analysis of HL60 cells treated with t-resveratrol in IC50 (Columns: BF—BrightField, AnxV—Annexin V-FITC, PI—Propidium Iodide; AnxV/PI—Coexpression of Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide; PhiPhiLux—Caspase3-FITC; PhiPhiLux/PI—coexpression of Caspase3-FITC and propidium iodide; Rows: A—viable cells (AnxV-/PI-); B—Early-apoptic cells (AnxV+/PI-); C—Late-apoptic cells (AnxV+/PI+); D—Necrotic cells (AnxV-/PI+); E—viable cells (Casp-/PI-); F— apoptic cells (Casp+/PI-, Casp+/PI+); G—necrotic cells (Casp-/PI+)).
Figure 3. Results of FlowSight analysis of HL60 cells treated with t-resveratrol in IC50 (Columns: BF—BrightField, AnxV—Annexin V-FITC, PI—Propidium Iodide; AnxV/PI—Coexpression of Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide; PhiPhiLux—Caspase3-FITC; PhiPhiLux/PI—coexpression of Caspase3-FITC and propidium iodide; Rows: A—viable cells (AnxV-/PI-); B—Early-apoptic cells (AnxV+/PI-); C—Late-apoptic cells (AnxV+/PI+); D—Necrotic cells (AnxV-/PI+); E—viable cells (Casp-/PI-); F— apoptic cells (Casp+/PI-, Casp+/PI+); G—necrotic cells (Casp-/PI+)).
Molecules 24 01896 g003
Molecules 24 01896 g004 550
Figure 4. Apoptosis analysis of HL60 cell line. Graphs taken from FlowSight cytometer. All axes are shown in a logarithmic scale. (Columns: 1—Annexin V-FITC and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC histogram; 2—propidium iodide histogram; 3—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot; Rows: A, B—IC50 of pterostilbene; C, D—IC50 of pterostilbene with mitoxantrone. Rows A, C—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide assay; B, D—PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide assay).
Figure 4. Apoptosis analysis of HL60 cell line. Graphs taken from FlowSight cytometer. All axes are shown in a logarithmic scale. (Columns: 1—Annexin V-FITC and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC histogram; 2—propidium iodide histogram; 3—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot; Rows: A, B—IC50 of pterostilbene; C, D—IC50 of pterostilbene with mitoxantrone. Rows A, C—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide assay; B, D—PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide assay).
Molecules 24 01896 g004
Molecules 24 01896 g005 550
Figure 5. Apoptosis analysis of HL60 cell line. Graphs taken from FlowSight cytometer. All axes are shown in a logarithmic scale. (Columns: 1—Annexin V-FITC and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC histogram; 2—propidium iodide histogram; 3—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot; Rows: A, B—untreated HL60 cells; C, D—HL60 cells with mitoxantrone. Rows A, C—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide assay, B, D—PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide assay).
Figure 5. Apoptosis analysis of HL60 cell line. Graphs taken from FlowSight cytometer. All axes are shown in a logarithmic scale. (Columns: 1—Annexin V-FITC and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC histogram; 2—propidium iodide histogram; 3—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot and PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide dot plot; Rows: A, B—untreated HL60 cells; C, D—HL60 cells with mitoxantrone. Rows A, C—Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide assay, B, D—PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC/propidium iodide assay).
Molecules 24 01896 g005
Molecules 24 01896 g006 550
Figure 6. Apoptosis analysis using PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC and propidium iodide on cell lines treated with tested stilbene derivatives. Explanations: Control+MIT—control with mitoxantrone; RES—IC50 of resveratrol; RES + MIT—IC50 of resveratrol with mitoxantrone; D-RHAP—IC50 of deoxyrhaponticin, D-RHAP + MIT—IC50 of deoxyrhaponticin with mitoxantrone; PIC—IC50 of piceatannol, PIC + MIT - IC50 of picetannol with mitoxantrone; PTER—IC50 of pterostilbene; D-RHAP + MIT—IC50 of pterostilbene with mitoxantrone; RHAP—IC50 of rhaponticin; RHAP + MIT—IC50 of rhaponticin with mitoxantrone. Each value is shown as Mean ± SD (n = 3 per probe; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus control; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 probe with mitoxantrone versus probe without mitoxantrone; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test).
Figure 6. Apoptosis analysis using PhiPhiLux-G1D2-FITC and propidium iodide on cell lines treated with tested stilbene derivatives. Explanations: Control+MIT—control with mitoxantrone; RES—IC50 of resveratrol; RES + MIT—IC50 of resveratrol with mitoxantrone; D-RHAP—IC50 of deoxyrhaponticin, D-RHAP + MIT—IC50 of deoxyrhaponticin with mitoxantrone; PIC—IC50 of piceatannol, PIC + MIT - IC50 of picetannol with mitoxantrone; PTER—IC50 of pterostilbene; D-RHAP + MIT—IC50 of pterostilbene with mitoxantrone; RHAP—IC50 of rhaponticin; RHAP + MIT—IC50 of rhaponticin with mitoxantrone. Each value is shown as Mean ± SD (n = 3 per probe; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus control; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 probe with mitoxantrone versus probe without mitoxantrone; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test).
Molecules 24 01896 g006
Molecules 24 01896 g007 550
Figure 7. Apoptosis analysis using Annexin V and propidium iodide on cell lines induced with tested stilbene derivatives with absence and presence of mitoxantrone. Explanations: see Figure 6 (n = 3 per probe; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus control; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 probe with mitoxantrone versus probe without mitoxantrone; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test).
Figure 7. Apoptosis analysis using Annexin V and propidium iodide on cell lines induced with tested stilbene derivatives with absence and presence of mitoxantrone. Explanations: see Figure 6 (n = 3 per probe; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 versus control; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 probe with mitoxantrone versus probe without mitoxantrone; one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc test).
Molecules 24 01896 g007
Table
Table 1. IC50 determined on tested cell lines. Each dose is shown in micromolar concentration [µM] as Mean ± SD.
Table 1. IC50 determined on tested cell lines. Each dose is shown in micromolar concentration [µM] as Mean ± SD.
Cell Linet-Resveratrol (Mean ± SD)Deoxyrhaponticin (Mean ± SD)Pterostilbene (Mean ± SD)Rhapontin (Mean ± SD)Piceatannol (Mean ± SD)
HL6054.09 ± 5.6947.54 ± 3.9014.25 ± 1.4841.75 ± 2.338.12 ± 2.17
HL60/MX153.95 ± 1.1850.52 ± 2.4624.35 ± 2.5728.38 ± 1.2620.76 ± 2.15
HL60/MX240.88 ± 1.8542.71 ± 2.6019.62 ± 1.9531.51 ± 2.5123.73 ± 1.63
CEM/C152.38 ± 3.2843.33 ± 3.5944.82 ± 2.7551.54 ± 2.3634.82 ± 3.87
CCRF-CEM7.22 ± 1.7819.33 ± 1.518.21 ± 0.7218.05 ± 2.224.57 ± 0.12

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Czop, M.; Bogucka-Kocka, A.; Kubrak, T.; Knap-Czop, K.; Makuch-Kocka, A.; Galkowski, D.; Wawer, J.; Kocki, T.; Kocki, J. Imaging Flow Cytometric Analysis of Stilbene-Dependent Apoptosis in Drug Resistant Human Leukemic Cell Lines. Molecules 2019, 24, 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101896

AMA Style

Czop M, Bogucka-Kocka A, Kubrak T, Knap-Czop K, Makuch-Kocka A, Galkowski D, Wawer J, Kocki T, Kocki J. Imaging Flow Cytometric Analysis of Stilbene-Dependent Apoptosis in Drug Resistant Human Leukemic Cell Lines. Molecules. 2019; 24(10):1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Czop, Marcin, Anna Bogucka-Kocka, Tomasz Kubrak, Karolina Knap-Czop, Anna Makuch-Kocka, Dariusz Galkowski, Joanna Wawer, Tomasz Kocki, and Janusz Kocki. 2019. "Imaging Flow Cytometric Analysis of Stilbene-Dependent Apoptosis in Drug Resistant Human Leukemic Cell Lines" Molecules 24, no. 10: 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24101896

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop