Next Article in Journal
Highly Efficient Recyclable Sol Gel Polymer Catalyzed One Pot Difunctionalization of Alkynes
Next Article in Special Issue
Lignin-Derived Biomaterials for Drug Release and Tissue Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Correcting Errors in Image Encryption Based on DNA Coding
Previous Article in Special Issue
Formation of Lignin Nanoparticles by Combining Organosolv Pretreatment of Birch Biomass and Homogenization Processes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Optimization of Lignin-Based Biocatalyst Production from Pine Sawdust and Wheat Straw

by
Froylán M.E. Escalante
1,
Alejandra Carranza-Hernández
1,
Adelina García-Zamora
1 and
Efrén Aguilar-Garnica
1,2,*
1
Department of Chemistry, Universidad Autónoma de Guadalajara, Zapopan 45129, Mexico
2
Mexican Bioenergy Innovation Centre, Bioalcohols Cluster, Av. del Bosque 1145, El Bajío, Zapopan 45019, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(8), 1877; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081877
Submission received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 20 July 2018 / Accepted: 24 July 2018 / Published: 27 July 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lignin for Energy, Chemicals and Materials)

Abstract

:
Pine sawdust and wheat straw are abundant lignocellulosic wastes that have been recently converted into bioethanol under a biochemical platform scheme whose main waste is lignin. Lignin can be transformed into a wide variety of high added-value products, including its functionalization as a catalyst. A key step in the synthesis of a lignin-based catalyst is the sulfonation reaction, whose operating conditions, namely, H2SO4 to lignin ratio (mL/g), temperature and time, have been arbitrarily chosen. In this contribution, an optimization methodology (i.e., Box-Behnken) is applied in order to found the operating conditions during the sulfonation reaction that maximizes the total acid sites density of lignin-based catalysts from pine sawdust and wheat straw. The optimization results show that the time in sulfonation reactions can be significantly reduced, compared to those previously reported, without affecting the performance of both catalysts in esterification reactions. These results could be further considered for energy and costs reduction purposes during the conceptual design engineering of the sulfonation reaction.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Pine sawdust and wheat straw are the main wastes from pine and wheat’s (Triticum spp.) industrial processing, respectively. In Mexico, pine sawdust is produced at a rate of 1 × 105 t per year [1], while wheat straw is generated at a rate of 4.6 × 106 t per year [2]. These wastes have been usually exploited as low-cost products. For instance, pine sawdust has been considered as adsorbent for the disposal of olive mill wastewater [3] or as a fluoride remover [4], whereas wheat straw has been used for animal bedding [5] or as a cattle feed [6]. Recently, these wastes have also been considered as feedstock for (second generation) bioethanol production in a biochemical platform scheme [7,8], in which the hemicellulose and cellulose contained in such wastes are transformed into bioethanol, while the lignin content (i.e., residual lignin) is currently discarded or converted into electricity [9]. With respect to this case, a number of efforts have been made to convert residual lignin into added-value products, such as resins, carbon fibers, fertilizers, etc. [10]. However, little has been done to transform residual lignin into a high-value product, such as a catalyst. For instance, Pua et al. [11] have considered Kraft lignin powders for the synthesis of a lignin-derived catalyst, whose activity was assessed in the esterification of oleic acid. Besides, Guo et al. [12] have used the hulls of Xanthoceras Sorbifolia for the synthesis of a lignin-based catalyst in the esterification of soybean soapstock. Furthermore, Hu et al. [13] have synthesized a lignin based catalyst from activated carbon fibers for cellulose hydrolysis and, recently, Zhu et al. [14] have also catalyzed the hydrolysis of microcrystalline cellulose with a biocatalyst, whose structure is based on Masson pine alkali lignin. A common and key step during the synthesis of catalysts in the aforementioned contributions is the sulfonation reaction because it provides the catalytic sites (e.g., -SO3H group) to the lignin network. Nevertheless, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most recommended operating conditions to conduct the sulfonation reaction. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, there is no study devoted to the adequate selection of such operating conditions. Thus, this work was intended as a description of how a Box-Behnken design might be applied to elucidate the sulfonation reaction operating conditions: The sulfuric acid to lignin ratio, temperature and time that optimizes (i.e., maximizes) the number of total -SO3H groups (i.e., total acid sites density) in lignin-based catalysts from pine sawdust and wheat straw. Then, this paper contributes to the valorization of residual lignin coming from the biochemical scheme processing of abundant wastes through the optimization of biocatalysts synthesis.
The results concerning the optimization of the lignin-based catalyst synthesis from pine sawdust are still patent-pending in México (MX/a/2016/011129), while the results related to the catalyst from wheat straw will also be patented. This is why we are only presenting, in this paper, a partial characterization of both catalysts. The qualitative characterizations have been performed via Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and the quantitative characterizations have been conducted by measuring the total number of -SO3H groups. Nevertheless, the lignin extraction process from pine sawdust and wheat straw, the transformation of these lignins to biocatalysts and the activity test of such biocatalysts in the esterification of oleic acid are fully detailed in the Materials and Methods section. Subsequently, the Box-Behnken design results are shown and expressed as the total number of -SO3H groups (i.e., total acid sites) as a function of the sulfonation reaction operating conditions. Finally, we discuss our results and compare them with those available in the literature within the Discussion section.

2. Results

2.1. Biocatalyst from Pine Sawdust

The lignin extraction yield for the pine sawdust without ashes was 29.96 ± 1.47% (m/m) and, after computing the pyrolysis and the sulfonation yields, it was possible to reach 22.1% (m/m), as the global yield of biocatalyst synthesis. The numerical results of the experimental design are depicted in Table 1 for the sulfonation process, expressed as Total Acid Sites (TAS), whose factors were X1: Ratio of concentrated H2SO4 to lignin (mL/g), X2: Temperature (°C), and X3: Time (h). These results, depicted in Figure 1a, are in the form of a surface response whose mathematical model is given by
TAS = −1.004 + 0.378X1 − 0.007X2 + 0.947X3 − 0.279X1X3 + 0.0000864X22 − 0.009X2X3 + 0.974X32
According to the ANOVA (Table 2), temperature (X2) and time (X3) were significant in such a design, with 0.95 confidence (p < 0.05). The interaction between the H2SO4-lignin ratio (X1) and time (X3) has a negative impact on the TAS (with p = 0.0006), and the same is true for the interaction between the temperature and time, but in a lesser degree (with p = 0.0027). A negligible positive effect can be observed for the squared term of temperature (X22); however, it can be observed that increasing the time could increase the TAS by up to 4 units when the time is adjusted to 2 h (p < 0.0071). The three-way interaction of the factors was not considered, since it was not possible to analyze its effect. The predicted maximum TAS was 2.0 meq H+/g, considering a 10:1 (mL/g) H2SO4-lignin ratio, 200 °C and 1 h. However, when the biocatalyst was prepared accordingly, the obtained TAS was equivalent to 1.68 meq H+/g. The difference between the experimental and predicted values for TAS could be attributed to the determination coefficient of the model, which is 80.23%. This biocatalyst was characterized via FTIR (see Figure 2a) and used to promote the esterification reaction of oleic acid, with methanol achieving a reaction yield of 94.73 ± 0.63%.

2.2. Biocatalyst from Wheat Straw

The lignin extraction yield for the (processed) wheat straw was 32.85 ± 7.8% (m/m). Then, after computing the pyrolysis and sulfonation yields, it was determined that the global yield for the biocatalyst synthesis was 18.8% (m/m). The numerical results of the experimental design for the sulfonation process are also shown in Table 1. These results, depicted in Figure 1b, are in the form of a surface response whose mathematical model is given by
TAS = 1.013 − 0.029X1 + 0.002X2 − 0.559X3 + 0.0004X1X2 − 0.00002X22 − 0.0005X2X3 + 0.216X32
In this case, ratio of concentrated H2SO4 to lignin (X1) and temperature (X2) were significant in such a design, with 0.95 confidence (p < 0.05), according to the ANOVA, shown in Table 3. The interaction between the H2SO4-lignin ratio (X1) and temperature was slightly important, but significant (p = 0.0156); neither the time nor the interaction temperature–time were significant. Since the coefficient of the squared term, including temperature (X22), is so small, its effect in the TAS could be almost neglected, even when it was significant (p = 0.0128); on the other hand, the squared value for the time (X32) implies that increasing the time could increase, by up to 1 unit, the TAS every 2 h of reaction. The interaction, X1X2, implies an increment in TAS of about 1 unit when the sulfuric acid to lignin ratio is kept at 10:1 and the temperature at 200 °C; however, the interaction temperature–time has a slightly negative impact on TAS, decreasing it by 0.2 units when the highest values of time and temperature were assayed.
The predicted maximum TAS was 0.78 meq H+/g, considering a 10:1 (mL/g) H2SO4-lignin ratio, 125 °C and 2 h. As expected, these conditions differ from those obtained in the synthesis of the lignin-based pine sawdust catalyst. This is probably due to the different nature of lignins. Furthermore, when the biocatalyst was prepared accordingly to the conditions, predicted to be the best using the model, the obtained TAS was equivalent to 0.74 meq H+/g (i.e., it was very close to that predicted by the surface response, and this is probably because the determination coefficient for this model (88.15) is higher than that obtained for the pine sawdust). This biocatalyst was characterized via FTIR (see Figure 2b) and used to catalyze the esterification reaction of oleic acid with methanol, achieving a reaction yield of 88.49 ± 0.57%.

3. Discussion

Lignin content in pine sawdust (29.96 ± 1.47%) is similar to that reported by Shulga et al. [15], whereas lignin content in processed wheat straw (32.85 ± 7.8%) is higher than that reported by Kumar et al. [16]. This could be due to the nature of wheat straw, whose major part of sugars had been removed, leaving behind the lignin in higher proportion. In addition, the maximum TAS for the lignin-based biocatalyst from pine sawdust, using the optimal conditions, was 1.68 meq H+/g, and it was achieved after 1 h of the sulfonation reaction. This value in acid sites density is similar to that reported by Pua et al. [11] and Guo et al. [12], although they considered 2 h of sulfonation reaction time. This is also close to the values depicted in the studies carried out by Liang et al. [17] and by Adhikari et al. [18], unless they inverted 5 h and 12 h, respectively. Despite the lower number of acid sites, the biocatalyst is almost equally efficient in the esterification reaction than those previously cited, although our biocatalyst was synthesized, investing only 1 h of the sulfonation reaction. Furthermore, the FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from pine sawdust (see Figure 2a) shows a transmittance band between 1250–1160 cm−1, which stands for the S=O stretching vibrations of the SO3H group [12].
On the other hand, the maximum TAS for the lignin-based biocatalyst from processed wheat straw was 0.78 meq H+/g, achieved at 125 °C and 2 h. This TAS value is in the middle of that reported by Hu et al. [13], although they considered 110–150 °C and 20 h. Our results and those obtained for the pine sawdust are compared with those available in the state of the art form of a Table (see Table 4). Our experimental results show that the reaction time of the sulfonation reaction might be reduced drastically to achieve similar results for the TAS. Besides, the temperature of the sulfonation reaction can also be reduced. The FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from wheat straw (see Figure 2b) is more specific than that shown in Figure 2a and related to the biocatalyst from pine sawdust because it shows two peaks: At 1032 cm−1 and at 1162 cm−1, which are usually related to the S=O symmetric and asymmetric stretching vibrations, respectively [12].
Finally, it is important to recall that the Box-Behnken design has been applied to the TAS as the response variable. These values were computed via NaOH titration and, as a consequence, they might contain some relatively weak acid sites that are not responsible for the esterification of oleic acid. Thus, our research efforts are now directed to determine the acid strength of both biocatalysts. At the moment, we are assuming that such weak acid sites are relatively low. This is probably why both biocatalysts are able to satisfactorily conduct the esterification reaction of oleic acid in the presence of methanol, promoting yields that are close to those reported by Pua et al. [11] and Guo et al. [12]. Another pending issue regarding the characterization of the biocatalyst is the analysis of their reuse and stability.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Lignin Extraction

Pine sawdust was obtained from a local timber industry and wheat straw was provided by CINVESTAV-Guadalajara in the form of a residue from a saccharification-fermentation process (i.e., processed wheat straw). These wastes were prepared in accordance with the standard method, T264-cm-07, from the Technical Association of the Pulp & Paper Industry (TAPPI, Corners, GA, USA). Briefly, in this method the wastes are extracted successively with acetone and hot water [19]. Then, acid-insoluble lignin from both prepared wastes was recovered following the standard method, T222-om-02. As stated, this study aims to valorize the residual lignin from lignocellulosic wastes that have been processed in a biochemical platform scheme. Thus, we have decided to apply the method, T222-om-02, because it has basically the same objective to that of a traditional biochemical platform scheme: To degrade hemicellulose and cellulose and to discard lignin [20].
The acid-insoluble lignin from sawdust was immersed in 86% H3PO4 (1:1.3 lignin to acid ratio) and left for 1 h at room temperature. Then, the slurry was pyrolyzed at 400 °C for 1 h under N2 gas flow (2 L/min) in a 1100 °C muffle furnace (Terlab, TE-M20D, Mexico City, Mexico). The resulting sample was abundantly washed with distilled water and then dried [11]. The pretreatment with H3PO4, the subsequent pyrolysis and the final washing were also applied to the lignin from wheat straw.

4.2. Optimization of Sulfonation Rections

The pyrolized lignins were transformed into solid acid biocatalysts by sulfonation reactions using concentrated H2SO4 and following a Box-Behnken experimental design, with the previously reported conditions of Pua et al. [11] and Guo et al. [12] as references. These conditions were: A concentrated H2SO4 to lignin (mL/g) ratio of 10:1, temperature of 200 °C, and time of 2 h. However, we hypothesized that these operational conditions may be improved for cost–energy savings. Then, the abovementioned three factors were tested with lower values, as shown in Table 1. For the experimental design, these factors were labelled as follows: X1: The ratio of concentrated H2SO4 to lignin (mL/g), X2: Temperature (°C), and X3: Time (h). The sulfonation reactions were conducted by duplicate. The resulting samples from each experimental assay were washed with distilled water and then dried. The Total Acid Sites density (TAS, in meq H+/g) was computed for each sample using acid-base back titration [21,22], and the obtained values were recorded as the response variable for the proposed experimental design. Then, an optimization procedure was carried out using the statistical software, Statgraphics Centurion XVI.

4.3. Global Yield of Biocatalyst Synthesis

The yields related to the lignin extraction process, the pyrolysis process and the sulfonation processes were computed as follows:
Lignin   extraction   yield   =   100   ×   ( mass   of   extracted   lignin mass   of   waste   ( sawdust   or   wheat   straw ) )
Pyrolysis   yield   =   100   ×   ( mass   of   pyrolized   lignin mass   of   extracted   lignin )
Sulfonation   yield   =   100   ×   ( mass   of   sulfonated   lignin mass   of   pyrolyzed   lignin )
Then, to show how much biocatalyst can be obtained from a pine sawdust or wheat straw sample, the global yield of biocatalyst synthesis, as the product of the lignin extraction yield, the pyrolysis yield and the sulfonation yield (expressed as fractions), was determined, which can be expressed as follows:
Global   yield   of   biocatalyst   synthesis   =   100   ×   ( mass   of   sulfonated   lignin mass   of   waste   ( sawdust   or   wheat   straw ) )

4.4. Activity Test of the Biocatalysts

The combination of factors X1 X2, X3, which maximizes the TAS, was considered to synthesize the biocatalysts that were characterized via FTIR (Thermo Scientific, Nicolet iS5, Waltham, MA, USA) and whose activity was monitored in the esterification reactions of oleic acid with methanol [23]. The esterification reaction has been selected to test the biocatalysts because it plays an important role in the transformation of highly acidic oil samples into biodiesel. The operating conditions of the esterification reactions were: 5 h, 60 °C and the following oleic acid-methanol-biocatalyst mass ratio of 1:2.35:0.2. The reaction yield was computed, considering the percentage of free fatty acids in oleic acid and in the oily phase of the final esterification product, as suggested by Cavalcanti et al. [24]. The percentages of free fatty acids were determined using the American Society for Testing and Materials standard method D974-80 (ASTM D974-80).

5. Conclusions

The transformation of lignin from pine sawdust and processed wheat straw into a biocatalyst via a sulfonation reaction was optimized using a Box-Behnken experimental design whose factors were X1: The ratio of concentrated H2SO4 to lignin (mL/g), X2: Temperature (°C), and X3: Time (h) affecting the TAS, which was considered as a response variable in the design. Our experimental results show that the TAS for both biocatalysts can be maximized if the sulfonation reaction time is 1 h, in the case of the pine sawdust, and 2 h, in the case of the processed wheat straw. These operation times are significantly lower than those reported in the literature. Thus, these findings might imply cost and energy reductions if they are further considered for the synthesis of the abovementioned biocatalysts.

6. Patents

The results concerning the optimization of the lignin-based biocatalyst synthesis from pine sawdust are patent-pending in MEXICO (MX/a/2016/011129).

Author Contributions

E.A.-G. conceived the study and revised the manuscript. F.M.E.E. wrote the manuscript and proposed and analyzed the Box-Behnken experimental design. A.C.-H. conducted the experiments related to pine sawdust and A.G.-Z. conducted the experiments related to processed wheat straw.

Funding

This research was partially funded by the Energy Sustainability Fund 2014-05 (CONACYT-SENER), the Mexican Bioenergy Innovation Centre, Bioalcohols Cluster Grant Number 249564.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Farías-Sánchez, J.C.; López-Miranda, J.; Castro-Montoya, A.J.; Saucedo-Luna, J.; Carrillo-Parra, A.; López-Albarrán, P.; Pineda-Pimentel, M.G.; Rutiaga-Quiñones, J.G. Comparison of five pretreatments for the production of fermentable sugars obtained from Pinus Pseudostrobus L. Wood. EXCLI J. 2015, 14, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. García, C.; Montero, G.; Coronado, M.; Torres, R.; Vázquez, A.M.; Ayala, J.R.; León, J.A.; Sagaste, C.A. Power generation estimation from wheat straw in Mexico. WIT Trans. Ecol Environ. 2015, 195, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chouchene, A.; Jeguireim, M.; Favre-Reguillon, A.; Trouvé, G.; Le Buzit, G.; Khiari, B.; Zagrouba, F. Energetic valorization of olive mill wastewater impregnated on low cost absorbent: Sawdust versus olive solid waste. Energy 2012, 39, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vázquez-Guerrero, A.; Alfaro-Cuevas-Villanueva, R.; Rutiaga-Quiñones, J.; Cortés-Martínez, R. Fluoride removal by aluminum-modified pine sawdust: Effect of competitive ions. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 94, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Moset, V.; Neves Xavier, C.D.A.; Feng, L.; Wahid, R.; Bjarne Moller, H. Combined low thermal alkali addition and mechanical pre-treatment to improve biogas yield from wheat straw. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 172, 1391–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wei, M.; Chen, L.; Feng, L.; Lian, X.M.; Chen, Z.Q.; Wei, S.J.; Yan, P.S. Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of Southern Yellow cattle fed a corn silage or straw-based diet. Livest. Sci. 2018, 207, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frankó, B.; Galbe, M.; Walberg, O. Bioethanol production from forestry residues: A comparative techno-economic analysis. Appl. Energy. 2016, 184, 727–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zabed, H.; Sahu, J.N.; Suely, A.; Boyce, A.N.; Faruq, G. Bioethanol production from renewable resources: Current perspectives and technological progress. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 475–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, G.; Bang, J. Evaluation of electricity generation from lignin residue and biogas in cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 1232–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Tian, X.; Fang, Z.; Smith, R.L.; Wu, Z.; Liu, M. Properties, chemical characteristics and application of lignin and its derivatives. In Production of Biofuels and Chemicals from Lignin; Fang, Z., Smith, R.L., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2016; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pua, F.; Fang, Z.; Zakaria, S.; Guo, F.; Chia, C. Direct production of biodiesel from high-acid value Jatropha oil with solid acid catalyst derived from lignin. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Guo, F.; Xiu, Z.; Liang, Z. Synthesis of biodiesel from acidified soybean soapstock using a lignin-derived carbonaceous catalyst. Appl. Energy 2012, 98, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, S.; Jiang, F.; Hsieh, Y. 1D lignin based solid acid catalyst for cellulose hydrolysis into glucose and nanocellulose. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 2566–25674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, J.; Gan, L.; Li, B.; Yang, X. Synthesis and characteristics of lignin-derived solid acid catalyst for microcrystalline cellulose hydrolisis. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shulga, G.; Betkers, T.; Shakels, V. Effect of the modification of lignocellulosic materials with a lignin-polymer complex on their mulching properties. BioResources 2007, 2, 572–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kumar, P.; Barret, D.M.; Delwiche, M.J.; Stroeve, P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2009, 48, 3713–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liang, F.; Song, Y.; Huang, C.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B. Preparation and performance evaluation of a lignin-based solid acid hydrolysis lignin. Catal. Commun. 2013, 40, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Adhikari, S.; Hood, Z.; Gallego, N.; Contescu, C. Lignin-derived carbon fibers as efficient heterogeneous solid acid catalysts for esterification of oleic acid. MRS Adv. 2018, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ullah, S.; Pakkanen, H.; Lehto, J.; Alén, R. A comparable study on the how-water treatment of wheat Straw and okra stalk prior to delignification. Biomass. Convers. Biorefin. 2018, 8, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Miranda, I.; Mirra, I.; Gominho, J.; Pereira, H. Fractioning og bark of Pinus pinea by milling and chemical characterization of the different fractions. Maderas Cienc. Tecnol. 2017, 19, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Helfferich, F.G. Ion Exchange; Dover Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, X.; Huang, M.; Ma, H.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Han, X.; Guo, X. Preparation of a carbon-based solid acid catalyst by sulfonating activated carbon in a chemical reduction process. Molecules 2010, 15, 7188–7196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Canakci, M.; Van Gerpen, J. Biodiesel production from oils and fats with high free fatty acids. Trans. ASAE 2001, 44, 1429–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cavalcanti, E.D.C.; Aguieiras, E.C.G.; da Silva, P.R.; Duarte, J.G.; Cipolatti, E.P.; Fernandez-Lafuente, R.; da Silva, J.A.C.; Freire, D.M.G. Improved production of biolubricants from soybean oil and different polyols via esterification reaction catalyzed by immobilized lipase from Candida Rugosa. Fuel 2018, 215, 705–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Figure 1. Surface responses for sulfonation experiments. (a) Surface response for sulfonation experiments of lignin from pine sawdust (time was set to the optimal value: 1 h); (b) Surface response for sulfonation experiments of lignin from processed wheat straw (time was set to the optimal value: 2 h).
Figure 1. Surface responses for sulfonation experiments. (a) Surface response for sulfonation experiments of lignin from pine sawdust (time was set to the optimal value: 1 h); (b) Surface response for sulfonation experiments of lignin from processed wheat straw (time was set to the optimal value: 2 h).
Molecules 23 01877 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of biocatalysts. (a) FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from pine sawdust; (b) FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from processed wheat straw.
Figure 2. FTIR spectrum of biocatalysts. (a) FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from pine sawdust; (b) FTIR spectra of the lignin-based biocatalyst from processed wheat straw.
Molecules 23 01877 g002
Table 1. Box-Behnken experimental design results for sulfonation reaction in biocatalysts synthesis.
Table 1. Box-Behnken experimental design results for sulfonation reaction in biocatalysts synthesis.
Ratio (mL/g) of Concentrated H2SO4 to Lignin (X1)Temperature (°C) (X2)Time (h) (X3)Total Acid Sites (TAS) (meq H+/g)
Pine SawdustWheat Straw
6:11001.50.97 ± 0.130.68 ± 0.13
6:11501.01.02 ± 0.06n.d.
6:11502.02.01 ± 0.060.59 ± 0.19
6:12001.51.37 ± 0.250.45 ± 0.13
8:11001.00.91 ± 0.13n.d.
8:11002.01.42 ± 0.000.77 ± 0.06
8:11501.50.94 ± 0.130.63 ± 0.19
8:12001.01.96 ± 0.060.58 ± 0.13
8:12002.01.53 ± 0.130.58 ± 0.06
10:11001.51.21 ± 0.250.67 ± 0.06
10:11501.01.10 ± 0.130.77 ± 0.25
10:11502.00.98 ± 0.060.82 ± 0.19
10:12001.51.44 ± 0.190.60 ± 0.06
n.d. = not determined.
Table 2. ANOVA for pine sawdust biocatalyst.
Table 2. ANOVA for pine sawdust biocatalyst.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Ratiop-Value
A:X10.102410.10242.840.1094
B:X20.792110.792121.940.0002
C:X30.22562510.2256256.250.0223
AC0.62161210.62161217.220.0006
BB0.26144610.2614467.240.0149
BC0.43711210.43711212.110.0027
CC0.33223110.3322319.200.0071
Total error0.649729180.036096
Total (corr.)3.2866525
R-squared = 80.23%, R-squared (adjusted by d.f.) = 72.54%.
Table 3. ANOVA for wheat straw biocatalyst.
Table 3. ANOVA for wheat straw biocatalyst.
SourceSum of SquaresdfMean SquareF-Ratiop-Value
A:X10.046661710.046661726.670.0001
B:X20.064771710.064771737.010.0000
C:X30.00012701910.0001270190.070.7911
AB0.012810.01287.310.0156
BB0.013736610.01373667.850.0128
BC0.00072559510.0007255950.410.5287
CC0.012865810.01286587.350.0154
Total error0.0279983160.00174989
Total (corr.)0.236223
R-squared = 88.15%, R-squared (adjusted by d.f.) = 82.96%.
Table 4. Comparative table of sulfonation conditions and total acid sites for the lignin-based biocatalyst.
Table 4. Comparative table of sulfonation conditions and total acid sites for the lignin-based biocatalyst.
Raw MaterialSulfonation ConditionsTotal Acid Sites of Lignin-Based CatalystReference
Kraft ligninTemperature: 200 °C
Time: 2 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 10:1 (g/mL)
2.21 mmol/gPua et al. [11]
Lignin from Xanthoceras SorbifoliaTemperature: 150 °C
Time: 2 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 5:10 (g/mL)
1.71 mmol/gGuo et al. [12]
Lignin based activated carbon fibersTemperature: 110 °C or 150 °C
Time: 20 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 5:10 (mg/mL)
0.3–2.43 mmol/gHu et al. [13]
Mason pine alkali ligninTemperature: 180 °C
Time: 12 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 20:1 (g/mL)
1.46–3.52 mmol/gZhu et al. [14]
Lignin from 40–60 mesh pine powder (Pinus tabuliformis)Temperature: 50 °C
Time: 5 h
Sulfuryl chloride+tetrachloroethane to biomass ratio: 75:10 (g/mL)
2.22 mmol/gLiang at al. [17]
Alcell ligninTemperature: 150 °C
Time: 12 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 50:1 (g/mL)
1.86 mmol/gAdhikari et al. [18]
Lignin from pine sawdustTemperature: 200 °C
Time: 1 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 10:1 (g/mL)
1.68 mmol/gThis study
Lignin from processed wheat strawTemperature: 125 °C
Time: 2 h
H2SO4 to biomass ratio: 10:1 (g/mL)
0.74 mmol/gThis study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Escalante, F.M.E.; Carranza-Hernández, A.; García-Zamora, A.; Aguilar-Garnica, E. Optimization of Lignin-Based Biocatalyst Production from Pine Sawdust and Wheat Straw. Molecules 2018, 23, 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081877

AMA Style

Escalante FME, Carranza-Hernández A, García-Zamora A, Aguilar-Garnica E. Optimization of Lignin-Based Biocatalyst Production from Pine Sawdust and Wheat Straw. Molecules. 2018; 23(8):1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081877

Chicago/Turabian Style

Escalante, Froylán M.E., Alejandra Carranza-Hernández, Adelina García-Zamora, and Efrén Aguilar-Garnica. 2018. "Optimization of Lignin-Based Biocatalyst Production from Pine Sawdust and Wheat Straw" Molecules 23, no. 8: 1877. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081877

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop