Next Article in Journal
HIV Resistance Prediction to Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors: Focus on Open Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Anticancer Profiling for Coumarins and Related O-Naphthoquinones from Mansonia gagei against Solid Tumor Cells In Vitro
Previous Article in Journal
Computational Prediction and Analysis of Associations between Small Molecules and Binding-Associated S-Nitrosylation Sites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Biflavonoids Isolated from Selaginella tamariscina and Their Anti-Inflammatory Activities via ERK 1/2 Signaling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 23
Issue 4
10.3390/molecules23040955
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Formation of Sulforaphane and Iberin Products from Thai Cabbage Fermented by Myrosinase-Positive Bacteria

by
Vijitra Luang-In
1,*,
Sirirat Deeseenthum
1,
Piyachat Udomwong
1,
Worachot Saengha
1 and
Matteo Gregori
2
1
Natural Antioxidant Innovation Research Unit, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology, Mahasarakham University, Khamriang, Kantarawichai, Mahasarakham 44150, Thailand
2
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2018, 23(4), 955; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040955
Submission received: 6 March 2018 / Revised: 11 April 2018 / Accepted: 18 April 2018 / Published: 19 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Collection Bioactive Compounds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Myrosinase-positive bacteria from local fermented foods and beverages in Thailand with the capacity to metabolize glucosinolate and produce isothiocyanates (ITCs) were isolated and used as selected strains for Thai cabbage fermentation. Enterobacter xiangfangensis 4A-2A3.1 (EX) from fermented fish and Enterococcus casseliflavus SB2X2 (EC) from fermented cabbage were the two highest ITC producers among seventeen strains identified by 16S rRNA technique. EC and EX were used to ferment Thai cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) containing glucoiberin, glucoraphanin and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin at 430.5, 615.1 and 108.5 µmol/100 g DW, respectively for 3 days at 25 °C. Different amounts of iberin nitrile, iberin, sulforaphane and indole 3-acetonitrile were produced by spontaneous, EX- and EC-induced cabbage fermentations, and significantly higher ITCs were detected (p < 0.01) with increased antioxidant activities. Iberin and sulforaphane production in EX-induced treatment peaked on day 2 at 117.4 and 294.1 µmol/100 g DW, respectively, significantly higher than iberin at 51.7 µmol/100 g DW but not significantly higher than sulforaphane at 242.6 µmol/100 g DW in EC-induced treatment at day 2. Maximum health-promoting benefits from this functional food can be obtained from consumption of a liquid portion of the fermented cabbage with higher ITC level along with a solid portion.

1. Introduction

Over the past 30 years, the public health landscape in Thailand has changed dramatically. Currently, non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading causes of deaths in the country [1,2,3]. These include cancer, cardiovascular disease, emphysema, diabetes and cirrhosis which are thought to be associated with free radical induced oxidative damage [4]. Recently, attention has focused on the development of antioxidative supplements or foods containing antioxidants as an effective and natural way to diminish oxidative damage and exert a beneficial effect on human health [5,6].
Thai fermented cabbage (a.k.a. ka-lum-plee-dong) is a popular traditional Thai dish made from shredded white cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata) fermented with naturally present lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in brined rice water for 1–3 days. It has similar characteristics to pao cai in China [7], sayur asin in Indonesia [8], kimchi in Korea [9] and sauerkraut in Europe [10]. White cabbage is enriched with glucosinolates (GSLs) 1 that differ between varieties, climatic and growth conditions [11]. When plant tissue is damaged during food preparation, the endogenous myrosinase enzyme (EC 3.2.1.147) comes into contact with GSLs and the subsequent hydrolysis produces isothiocyanates (ITCs), nitriles (NITs), thiocyanates and/or epithionitriles [12]. ITCs are the most prominent products, especially sulforaphane, which have proven chemopreventive, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities [13]. Microbial fermentation is commonly used to preserve vegetables, but it also enhances the antioxidant activity of sauerkraut possibly due to the synergistic effects of wounding and biochemical processes incurred by LAB [14].
Accumulating evidence suggests that certain bacterial strains with myrosinase activity including Bifidobacterium spp. [15], Lactobacillus agilis R16 [16], Enterococcus casseliflavus CP1 [16], Escherichia coli VL8 [16], Citrobacter sp. Wye 1 [17], E. coli O157:H1 [18] and Enterobacter cloacae [19] are capable of metabolizing GSLs to ITCs and/or NITs. To date, the myrosinase-positive bacteria have not been identified in Thailand.
Thus, this study aimed to isolate and identify myrosinase-positive bacteria from Thai fermented foods and use them to induce microbial fermentation of Thai cabbage. GSL degradation, ITC production and antioxidant activity in Thai fermented cabbages were investigated based on fermentation time and strains of bacteria used to induce fermentation. Results were compared with spontaneous fermentation and unfermented fresh cabbage. Traditionally, only the solid portion of Thai fermented cabbage is consumed while the liquid portion is discarded. Here, amounts of ITCs present in both portions were examined to ensure the maximum health benefits one can obtain from consuming Thai fermented cabbage. After consumption, bioactive ITC products exert positive effects inside the human body. Myrosinase-positive bacteria inhabit the gut and influence the bioavailability of GSLs and ITCs in ingested raw and cooked Brassica vegetables. Thus, Thai fermented cabbage can be promoted as a functional food with enhanced health-beneficial effects for the Thai population.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. GSL-Metabolizing Bacteria from Thai Fermented Foods and Drinks

Twenty-one bacterial isolates from eight sources of Thai local fermented foods and beverages were identified as GSL-metabolizing bacteria using selective M9 agar containing GSL called sinigrin 2 (Figure 1), and identified at subspecies level using 16S rRNA gene analysis. Results in Table 1 show the greatest number of newly identified GSL-metabolizing bacterial species coming from Thai fermented cabbage followed by Thai fermented fish, resulting in isolation of 8 and 3 bacterial species, respectively. When sinigrin was metabolized by bacterial myrosinase, the degradation product i.e., ITC namely allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) 6 was expected.
Most GSL-metabolizing bacteria were able to produce AITC from sinigrin metabolism using GC-MS and HPLC analyses, respectively. The majority of ITC-producing bacteria belonged to the genera Enterobacter and Enterococcus, with the two highest ITC producers named as Ent. xiangfangensis 4A-2A3.1 (EX) from fermented fish and Ec. casseliflavus SB2X2 (EC) from fermented cabbage producing 65 and 61 nmol AITC, respectively from 100% sinigrin degradation within 24 h. Therefore, these two isolates were chosen as starter cultures to ferment Thai cabbage in further experiments. Although the bacteria belonged to the same genus e.g., Enterobacter, they exhibited different GSL-metabolizing capacity, with possibly different myrosinase activity (Table 1). AITC was unstable in the culture medium [20], and AITC product formation never reached 100% with the highest found in EX at 65%. However, Lactococcus hircilactis WS16, Lb. lactis WS18 and Bacillus sp. KW3 did not produce AITC from 77–80% sinigrin degradation, suggesting that they may have different GSL metabolic enzymes, or utilize mechanisms from other bacteria to metabolize GSL but not to produce ITC.
Two bacterial species were found in more than one sample; Enterobacter sp. 1A-1A with 92% identity to Enterobacter sp. Md1-53 was found in fermented cabbage, pickled onions and fermented juices, while Ent. faecalis 5A-2B with 99% identity to Ent. faecalis NW A20 was present in both fermented cabbage and fermented herbal drink. Thus, 17 bacterial strains were identified from 20 isolates from eight Thai fermented food/drink samples. None of these 17 bacterial strains at subspecies level have ever been reported as GSL metabolizers and/or ITC producers, yet they shared the same genus or the same species as previously identified ones. Prior findings showed a variety of GSL-metabolizing bacterial strains such as Bacillus thuringiensis [21], Actinomycetes isolated from cotton soil [22], E. coli VL8, Ec. casseliflavus CP1 isolated from human faeces [23], Lb. plantarum KW30, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis KF147, E. coli Nissle 1917 isolated from foods [24], B. pseudocatenulatum, B. adolescentis, B. longum [15], Lb. agilis R16 [25], and a known myrosinase-producer Ent. cloacae isolated from soil [19].
Here, all the 17 identified bacteria belonged to the genus Enterobacter including Bacillus, Lactococcus, Escherichia, Enterobacter and Enterococcus. Contrary to popular belief, Lc. hircilactis WS16 (100% identity to Lc. hircilactis DSM 28960) and Lc. lactis WS18 (98% identity to Lc. lactis RCB787) did not produce ITC from GSL metabolism, indicating that not all LAB are able to produce ITC as previously thought. Similarly, it was found that Lb. plantarum KW30 and Lc. lactis subsp. lactis KF147 did not produce ITC from glucoraphanin, glucoerucin and glucoiberverin. Instead, they generated sulforaphane nitrile as well as erucin nitrile and iberverin nitrile [24].
Most isolated bacteria show highest % identity to the closest relative bacteria originating from food sources and plants, followed by human/animal guts and environments located mostly in Asia including China, India, Korea, Pakistan, Thailand and also other parts of the world including Italy, Belgium, Brazil and South Africa (Table 1). Probiotic reports of both Enterobacter spp. and Enterococcus spp. are very few; however, the genome of Ent. xiangfangensis isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough was recently published [26]. In addition, Ec. faecium-group and Ec. faecalis-group were also isolated at the early stages of cauliflower fermentation [27], indicating that Enterococcus and Enterobacter are commonly found in fermented foods.

2.2. Phylogenetic Tree of GSL-Metabolizing Bacteria

The phylogenetic tree shows 17 GSL-metabolizing bacteria isolated in this study and nine reference bacteria with GSL-metabolizing capacity from previous reports, categorized into three main groups (Figure 2).
The first and biggest group (30.1% node) comprised all bacteria isolated here including LAB, Enterococcus and Bacillus along with the reference LAB [24] and Enterococcus [16] from previous findings. The subgroup consisted of Enterobacter as well as reference Citrobacter [17]. The second group (89.1% node) included only three reference E. coli bacteria [16,24,28]. Similarly, the third group (100% node) included only two reference Enterobacter bacteria [19]. Thus, Enterobacter spp. isolated here were evolutionarily more closely related to Citrobacter sp. WYE1 [17] than Ent. cloacae [19]. This is the first report identifying Ent. xiangfangensis, Ent. ludwigii, Ent. asburiae and several new Bacillus spp. as GSL metabolizers and also ITC producers.

2.3. ITC Products from Fermented Cabbage

The inoculums of EX and EC were used to ferment Thai cabbage containing three GSLs, namely glucoiberin (GIB), glucoraphanin (GRP) and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin (GBS) at 430.5, 615.1 and 108.5 µmol/100 g dry weight, respectively (Table 2; Figure 3A) for 3 days at 25 °C.
In comparison, Chinese cabbage (in kimchi) contained five types of GSLs at approximately 8.3 µmol/g dry weight including glucoalyssin, gluconapin, glucobrassicanapin, glucobrassicin, and 4-methoxyglucobrassicin [29]. The total GSLs including GIB, GRP and GBS in this work were present in higher amounts, indicating that cabbages in different countries contain various kinds of GSLs (Table S3) in diverse amounts depending on environmental factors such as geographical location, temperature, solar radiation, humidity and climatic conditions [30]. Four degradation products of the three GSLs namely iberin nitrile (IBN), iberin (IBR), sulforaphane (SFN) and indole 3-acetonitrile (IAN), respectively have already been detected in fresh cabbage but in smaller amounts to fermented samples (Figure 3B, Table 2). Product generation results from intrinsic plant myrosinase in cabbage contacting with GSL from tissue damage during the handling process when GSL hydrolysis occurs. Table 2 shows gradual GSL degradations in all treatments. Spontaneous cabbage fermentation produced less IBR and SFN at days 2–3 although high GSL degradation was observed suggesting that certain bacterial strains naturally present in the spontaneous fermentation may be able to degrade GSLs but are not capable of producing ITCs.
However, IBN was found in reduced amounts at days 2–3 for induced fermentation of cabbage than for spontaneous fermentation, possibly due to the presence of bacterial enzymes transforming nitrile products to other metabolites. GRP was degraded more rapidly during bacterial-induced cabbage fermentations than spontaneous fermentation, indicating the presence of specific GRP-metabolizing bacteria in the samples. GBS totally disappeared at the end of day 1 due to its initial low content in Thai cabbage (Figure 3A; Table 2). Degradation products namely IBN, IBR, SFN and IAN were also detected in fresh cabbage (Figure 3B).
IAN production in all treatments was similar at each day and gradually declined over time. Production of both IBR and SFN in EX-induced cabbage fermentation peaked on day 2 at 117.4 and 294.1 µmol/100 g dry weight, respectively, significantly higher than IBR at 51.7 µmol/100 g dry weight but not significantly higher than SFN at 242.6 µmol/100 g dry weight in EC-induced fermented cabbage at day 2. Overall degradation products in all treatments declined over 3 days, never reaching 100% product formation (Table S2). This was perhaps caused by the unstable nature of ITCs in fermentation matrices [20] and a possibility that ITCs may kill the myrosinase-positive bacteria which then cannot produce the corresponding compounds. In addition, SFN content detected in the liquid portion of EC-induced cabbage fermentation at day 2 was significantly higher (p < 0.01) than found in the fermented cabbage solid portion by almost three-fold (Table 2). Typically, Thai people only consume a solid portion of fermented cabbage and discard a liquid portion with higher ITC level. Thus, this study should urge Thai consumers to consume both portions to obtain a maximum health-benefits provided by Thai fermented cabbage.
The pH values of fermented cabbages at day 3 were 3.55 (N), 3.25 (EX) and 3.45 (EC) with no statistical differences (Figure S2), comparable to pH values of 3.27–3.67 of sauerkraut from Spanish cabbage over 7-day fermentation at 25 °C by Lb. plantarum (CECT 748) and Leuconostoc mesenteroides (CECT 219) (Table S3).
Similarly, ITC products including SFN at 39–49 µmol/100 g dry weight, IBR, and IBN were detected from metabolism of glucoraphanin and glucoiberin in sauerkraut from Spanish cabbage, similar to our products but in smaller amounts, except for allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) and allyl nitrile (ANIT) that were only found in sauerkraut. However, these products were not detected in their raw cabbage [31] suggesting that fermentation was responsible for ITC and NIT production. Similarly, sauerkraut made from cabbage grown in Finland produced SFN, AITC, ANIT and indole 3-carbinol (I3C) from glucoiberin, sinigrin and glucobrassicin, respectively [32].
In contrast, sauerkraut made from cabbage grown in Germany only produced ascorbigen and I3C from glucoiberin, sinigirin, glucobrassicin, glucoraphanin and 4-methoxy glucobrassicin [33]. SFN was also found in Korean kimchi but in reduced amount than fresh cabbage [34], and sometimes not found at all [35]. Different ITC production from diverse fermented cabbage products in various countries may result from the disparate cabbage cultivars used and bacterial species present in the fermentation.

2.4. Antioxidant Activity of Fermented Cabbage

Since EX-induced cabbage fermentations yielded the highest ITCs, these were used to evaluate antioxidant activity compared with spontaneous fermentation. Results showed that over 3 days EX-induced cabbage fermentations exhibited significantly higher % DPPH scavenging activity (Figure 4A), FRAP activity (Figure 4B) and ABTS radical scavenging activity (Figure 4C) than spontaneous fermentations.
Antioxidant activities of fresh cabbage at day 0 were similar to both spontaneous and induced fermentations and increased over time, indicating that bacterial metabolism was responsible for increasing antioxidants and ITCs in the fermented cabbage (Table 2).
Lactic-fermented cabbage in China, prepared by a dry-salt method and extracted with methanol, showed antioxidant activity of DPPH radical scavenging effect at 60% [36], similar to DPPH radical scavenging effect at 62.1% at day 2 by EX-induced fermentation (Figure 4A).
In addition, lactic-fermented red cabbage sprouts gave significantly higher antioxidant functionalities than their unfermented/control counterparts. Fermented red cabbage sprouts inoculated with Lb. plantarum showed the highest antioxidant activities (DPPH scavenging: 70.92%; TEAC: 1.94 mM Trolox equivalent), and almost two-fold higher than unfermented treatments.
Another possibility is that during fermentation, certain strains of Lactobacillus, Enterococcus and Enterobacter are able to produce exopolysaccharides (EPSs) with antioxidant potential from sugars and carbohydrates in cabbage [8] and thus enhancing antioxidant capacity in comparison with the unfermented cabbage. Cabbage is known to provide relatively higher fermentability than other vegetables because it has more fermentable saccharides [36]. For example, Lb. acidophillus and Lb. bulgaricus isolated from cabbage were found to be able to produce EPSs with 78.13–87.55% and 68.56–75.13% DPPH scavenging activities, respectively [37]. In addition, EPS from Ec. faecium K1 isolated from kalarei exhibited substantial DPPH scavenging ability (31.65–64.22%) at different concentrations of EPS (0.5–2.5 mg/mL) [38]. EPS from Enterobacter sp. YG4 isolated from the gut contents of the slug showed 25% hydroxyl radical scavenging ability and total antioxidant capacity in vitro at 32.5 µg VEAC/mL [39]. Antioxidant capacity of bacterial EPS might be attributed to its hydroxyl group and other functional groups in EPS, such as –COOH, C=O and –O–, which can donate electrons to reduce the radicals to a more stable form, or react with the free radicals to terminate the radical chain reaction [40]. These results indicated that fermentation using EPS-producing bacterial strains such as certain LAB and Enterobacter could be applied as a method to improve the potential antioxidant activities of fermented vegetables [41].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Sample Collection

Six out of eight fermented foods and beverages samples were purchased from local markets in Mahasarakham Province, Thailand for isolation of myrosinase-positive microbes. Samples (Figure S1) included (1) fermented cabbage; (2) picked onions; (3) fermented fish; (4) fermented pork; (5) fermented herbal drink; (6) fermented star fruit juice; (7) water kefir from Nakhon Ratchasima Province; and (8) milk kefir from Kamphaeng Phet Province. Samples were stored at 4 °C and analyzed within 24 h.

3.2. Isolation of GSL-Metabolizing Microbes

Solid food materials and liquid (5 g each, 10 g in total) or liquid beverage (10 mL) were weighed and mixed with 90 mL of sterile 0.85% NaCl solution. The mixture was homogenized in a sterile mortar and pestle for 5 min, mixed by vortexing for 5 min and then centrifuged at 4000 g for 15 min to obtain a clear supernatant. Enrichment culture technique was followed by inoculating 100 µL bacterial suspension into 900 µL LB broth containing 1 mM sinigrin for 2 days in an anaerobic incubator; this step was repeated at day 4, 6 and 8 in fresh Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (10 g Tryptone; 10 g NaCl; 5 g yeast extract in 1 L). At day 10, 100 µL of bacterial suspension was spread onto selective M9 minimal medium (1 M MgSO4; 1 M CaCl2; 50% glucose; 1% thiamine; 64 g Na2HPO4-7H2O; 15 g KH2PO4; 2.5 g NaCl; 5.0 g NH4Cl; 15 g agar in 1 L) containing 1 mM sinigrin and 2.5 mM barium acetate and incubated at 37 °C for 72 h in an anaerobic incubator. Growth and opaque zone formation were indicators of sinigrin degradation as evidenced by the white precipitation of barium sulfate. This demonstrated release of the sulfate group of GSL and, thus, GSL-metabolizing/myrosinase-positive isolates were selected from each food sample. Stock positive isolates were stored in LB medium with 20% glycerol at −80 °C. All microbial isolates were deposited in the Natural Antioxidant Innovation Research Unit, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Technology (WDCM 1160), Mahasarakham University, Thailand.

3.3. In Vitro Sinigrin Incubation

Sinigrin (1 mM) 2 was incubated with each selected bacterial culture (100 µL, OD600nm = 0.5) from the previous step in 100 µL LB medium at 37 °C without shaking in an anaerobic incubator for 24 h. Bacterial cultures were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 5 min, then 100 µL of clear supernatant was removed for high performance liquid chromatography using a diode-array detector (HPLC-DAD), with the remaining 900 µL kept at −20 °C until required for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis.

3.4. Genomic DNA Isolation and 16S rRNA Gene Analysis

Selected isolates with the confirmed positive results of GSL degradation from HPLC analysis were cultured overnight for gram-staining, genomic DNA extraction, and PCR-based 16S rRNA gene analysis using universal primers following the previous method [23]. The phylogenetic tree of 16S rRNA partial sequences was constructed using FigTree software (v1.4.2) (Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK) [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/ figtree/].

3.5. Starter Culture Preparation

Both selected bacteria were grown in 10 mL LB medium overnight and centrifuged at 8000 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed twice with fermented sticky rice water (initial pH 6.0) overnight. A concentration of 106 CFU/mL was inoculated in 3% (v/v) into the prepared cabbage-rice water jar (200 mL) and fermented as mentioned below. Induced fermentations (EX and EC) were defined by inoculation of either EX or EC culture and spontaneous fermentations (N = Non-induced) were those without inoculation of either culture.

3.6. Cabbage Fermentations

Thai white cabbage heads were purchased from Pran Fresh Co. Ltd., Khon Kaen, Thailand. After removing the core and outer layers, 3 kg of cabbage heads from the same batch were separated into leaf pieces manually according to the local cabbage fermentation procedure. Spontaneous fermentation was performed by thorough mixing of torn plant materials with 7% salt (w/v) and washing with distilled water. A total of 200 g solid plant materials were transferred into each replicate fermentation pot (500 mL glass container with lid, already containing 200 mL fermented rice water pH 6.0 mixed with 7% salt (w/v)). The salted cabbage materials were tightly pressed into the jars which were then closed and kept at 25 °C for 3 days without shaking. Triplicate measurements were performed throughout the study. The control was 200 g fresh cabbage heads separated into leaf pieces manually without fermentation at 0 h, and these were determined for initial GSL and ITC products and compared with spontaneously fermented cabbage samples (N) and cabbage fermentations induced by EX or EC.

3.7. Sampling and Extraction of Fermented Cabbage

Fermentation was carried out in parallel in 36 jars with triplicate measurements for each of the three treatments (N, EX and EC) from day 0 to day 3. Sampling was performed at day 0, 1, 2 and 3 with pH measured immediately after opening the fermentation jars. For extraction of GSLs and ITC products, the whole samples from each jar collected as mentioned above were frozen at −80 °C, dried in a freeze dryer and processed accordingly for GSL and ITC analyses as described below. For EC samples at day 2, half of the cabbage leafy material and half the fermented liquid were separated for GSL and ITC determination to evaluate which contained higher contents. Dried samples were ground into small pieces using a sterile mortar and pestle and weighed for extraction by 95% ethanol at concentration of 25 mg/mL at 25 °C for 24 h. The mixtures were centrifuged at 16,000 g for 5 min and clear supernatants were collected for antioxidant activity analyses.

3.8. Sample Preparation and HPLC Analysis to Detect GSLs

The GSL extraction method followed the previous report [42] with minor modifications. Freeze-dried samples (5 g) were ground and mixed with 5 mL of 70% methanol by shaking at 37 °C for 5 min, and the supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 8000 g for 15 min. The remaining solid sample was re-extracted and the supernatant was mixed with the first extraction. The mixture was dried at 70 °C in an oven and the dried residues were dissolved in 1 mL of deionized water using a vortex. The 1 mL sample was processed in DEAE-25A anion exchange resin as previously described [23]. A HPLC-DAD system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) fitted with a Synergi 4 µm Hydro-RP 80A, 150 × 2 mm, 4.6 micron (Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) protected with a security guard column AQ C18 (4 × 3 mm) comprising of Shimadzu LC-20AC pumps and a SPD-M20A diode array detector were used for GSL analysis using the following gradient: Water (Solvent A)–Acetonitrile (Solvent B) gradient 2% B (15 min), 2–25% B (2 min), 25–70% B (2 min), 70% B (2 min hold), 70–2% B (2 min), and 2% B (15 min) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min at 35 °C. Eluent was monitored at A229 nm. Quantification of desulfoglucosinolate (DS-GSL) was achieved using known response factors for each GSL relative to an external standard (sinigrin 2). Pure sinigrin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), glucoiberin (3), glucoraphanin (4), and 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin (5) (Cfm Oskar Tropitzsch, Germany) were purchased as standards (Figure 1).

3.9. Sample Preparation and GC-MS Analysis to Detect Degradation Products

Freeze-dried samples (500 mg) were mixed with dichloromethane (DCM, 3 mL) in test tubes with tight lids for 24 h at 250 rpm at room temperature. The mixtures were centrifuged at 16,100 g for 5 min and the supernatants (1 mL) were added with 0.5 g magnesium sulfate, mixed and then centrifuged at 16,100 g for 20 min. Clear supernatants were transferred into vials and kept at −20 °C awaiting GC-MS analysis. A Shimadzu QP2010 system and an Agilent HP-5MS (5% phenylmethylsiloxane, 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d.; film thickness, 0.25 μm) capillary column were used for ITC analysis. GC-MS analytic conditions were performed as previously reported [23]. Ion source temperature was 230 °C and the electron multiplier voltage was 70.1 eV. Authentic standards of AITC 6 and SFN 9 (Figure 1) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. Identification was based on retention time and fragment ions (Table S1). Quantification of degradation products was calculated using an external standard curve of AITC or SFN.

3.10. Antioxidant Activity of Fermented Cabbage

This was evaluated through the free radical scavenging effect on 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical [43], ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay [44] and 2,2′-azino-bis 3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging assay [45] using 25 mg/mL freeze-dried extract dissolved in 95% ethanol as the starting solution.

3.11. Statistical Analyses

Triplicates were used for each treatment and results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Significant differences between means were calculated by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple range test at p < 0.01 using SPSS package version 19.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

4. Conclusions

This is the first report to highlight the application of newly isolated myrosinase-positive bacteria to produce Thai fermented cabbage with enhanced ITC levels, antioxidant activities and thus possibly enhanced health benefits. Induced cabbage fermentation by EX or EC produced higher SFN and IBR contents than spontaneous fermentation of cabbage and unfermented fresh cabbage. Fermented liquid and solid cabbage portions should be combined for consumption at day 1 or 2, when the highest ITCs with less nitrile products provide the maximum health-promoting benefits. Myrosinase-positive bacteria isolated from Thai fermented foods can be used as a starter culture for traditional fermented cabbage and promoted as a functional food in low cost with bioactivities from ITC products, similar to fermented cabbage products from other countries such as sauerkraut and kimchi.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Table S1. Mass spectral (MS) data of metabolites detected in this work. Table S2. Percentage (%) production of degradation products upon glucosinolate metabolism during cabbage fermentation with/without induced bacterial culture over 3 days. Table S3. ITC products from different fermented cabbage products from different countries. Figure S1. Origins of Thai fermented foods and beverages and their physical appearances. Figure S2. The pH values of fermented cabbage with/without bacterial induction over 3 days.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the Thailand Research Fund through the TRF Grant for New Researcher (grant no. TRG5880096) and Mahasarakham University, Thailand. The authors thank John T. Rossiter for advice on the manuscript and Peter Humphrey Charge for proofreading the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Vijitra Luang-In received the research grant, conceived, designed the experiments and wrote the paper; Sirirat Deeseenthum advised on experimental design, Piyachat Udomwong analyzed the data; Worachot Saengha and Matteo Gregori performed the experiments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kaufman, N.D.; Chasombat, S.; Tanomsingh, S.; Rajataramya, B.; Potempa, K. Public health in Thailand: Emerging focus on non-communicable diseases. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2011, 26, e197–e212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xanthos, D. Country in focus: Economic transition and non-communicable diseases in Thailand. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 684–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Country Statistics and Global Health Estimates by WHO and UN Partners. Available online: http://www.who.int/gho/en/ (accessed on 31 March 2018).
  4. Camps, J.; García-Heredia, A. Introduction: Oxidation and inflammation, a molecular link between non-communicable diseases. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2014, 824, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Sun, Y.P.; Chou, C.C.; Yu, R.C. Antioxidant activity of lactic-fermented Chinese cabbage. Food Chem. 2009, 115, 912–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Park, J.M.; Shin, J.H.; Gu, J.G.; Yoon, S.J.; Song, J.C.; Jeon, W.M.; Suh, H.J.; Chang, U.J.; Yang, C.Y.; Kim, J.M. Effect of antioxidant activity in kimchi during a short-term and over-ripening fermentation period. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 122, 356–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, Z.; Shao, Y. Effects of microbial diversity on nitrite concentration in pao cai, a naturally fermented cabbage product from China. Food Microbiol. 2018, 72, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Swain, M.R.; Anandharaj, M.; Ray, R.C.; Parveen Rani, R. Fermented fruits and vegetables of Asia: A potential source of probiotics. Biotechnol. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 250424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Paramithiotis, S.; Shin, H.S. Kimchi and other widely consumed traditional fermented foods of Korea: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Beganović, J.; Kos, B.; Pavunc, A.L.; Uroić, K.; Jokić, M.; Šušković, J. Traditionally produced sauerkraut as source of autochthonous functional starter cultures. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Verkerk, R.; Schreiner, M.; Krumbein, A.; Ciska, E.; Holst, B.; Rowland, I.; De Schrijver, R.; Hansen, M.; Gerhäuser, C.; Mithen, R.; et al. Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: The influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2009, 53, S219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hayes, J.D.; Kelleher, M.O.; Eggleston, I.M. The cancer chemopreventive actions of phytochemicals derived from glucosinolates. Eur. J. Nutr. 2008, 47, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Kostov, R.V. Glucosinolates and isothiocyanates in health and disease. Trends Mol. Med. 2012, 18, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kusznierewicz, B.; Śmiechowska, A.; Bartoszek, J.; Namieśnik, J. The effect of heating and fermenting on antioxidant properties of white cabbage. Food Chem. 2008, 108, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cheng, D.L.; Hashimoto, K.; Uda, Y. In vitro digestion of sinigrin and glucotropaeolin by single strains of Bifidobacterium and identification of the digestive products. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2004, 42, 351–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Luang-In, V.; Albaser, A.A.; Nueno-Palop, C.; Narbad, A.; Bennett, M.; Rossiter, J.R. Metabolism of glucosinolates and desulfo-glucosinolates by selected human gut bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Albaser, A.; Kazana, E.; Bennett, M.; Cebeci, F.; Luang-In, V.; Spanu, P.D.; Rossiter, J.T. Discovery of a bacterial glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3) β-glucosidase with myrosinase activity from a Citrobacter strain isolated from soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 1520–1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Luciano, F.B.; Holley, R.A. Bacterial degradation of glucosinolates and its influence on the growth of E. coli O157:H7. Fleischwirtsch. Int. 2011, 1, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tani, N.; Ohtsuru, M.; Hata, T. Isolation of myrosinase producing microorganism. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1974, 38, 1617–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Luang-In, V.; Rossiter, J.T. Stability studies of isothiocyanates and nitriles in aqueous media. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 37, 625–630. [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Shora, H.M.; El-Shobaky, A.M.; El-Atrozy, M.M. Activity of purified bacterial myrosinase and its essential residues. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2016, 5, 567–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Madhuri, R.J.; Amerada, M. Production of myrosinase enzyme by Actinomycetes isolated from cotton soil. Int. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Sci. 2015, 3, 397–403. [Google Scholar]
  23. Luang-In, V.; Narbad, A.; Nueno-Palop, C.; Mithen, R.; Bennett, M.; Rossiter, J.T. The metabolism of methylsulfinylalkyl- and methylthioalkyl-glucosinolates by a selection of human gut bacteria. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2014, 58, 875–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mullaney, J.A.; Kelly, W.; Mcghie, T.K.; Ansell, J.; Heyes, J.A. Lactic acid bacteria convert glucosinolates to nitriles efficiently yet differently to Enterobacteriaceae. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3039–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Llanos-Palop, M.; Smiths, J.P.; Brink, B.T. Degradation of sinigrin by Lactobacillus agilis strain R16. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 26, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gu, C.T.; Li, C.Y.; Yang, L.J.; Huo, C.G. Enterobacter xiangfangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough, and reclassification of Enterobacter sacchari Zhu et al. 2013 as Kosakonia sacchari comb. Nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2014, 64, 2650–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Paramithiotis, S.; Hondrodimou, O.L.; Drosinos, E.H. Development of the microbial community during spontaneous cauliflower fermentation. Food Res. Int. 2013, 43, 1098–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cordeiro, R.P.; Doria, J.H.; Zhanel, G.G.; Sparling, R.; Holley, R.A. Role of glycoside hydrolase genes in sinigrin degradation by E. coli O157:H7. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 205, 105–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, H.J.; Lee, M.J.; Jeong, M.H.; Kim, J.E. Identification and quantification of glucosinolates in kimchi by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Int. J. Anal. Chem. 2017, 2017, 6753481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bohinc, T.; Trdan, S. Environmental factors affecting the glucosinolate content in Brassicaceae. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 357–360. [Google Scholar]
  31. Peñas, E.; Pihlava, J.M.; Vidal-Valverde, C.; Frias, J. Influence of fermentation conditions of Brassica oleracea L. var. capitata on the volatile glucosinolate hydrolysis compounds of sauerkrauts. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 48, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Tolonen, M.; Taipale, M.; Viander, B.; Pihlava, J.M.; Korhonen, H.; Ryhänen, E.L. Plant-derived biomolecules in fermented cabbage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 6798–6803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Palani, K.; Harbaum-Piayda, B.; Meske, D.; Keppler, J.K.; Bockelmann, W.; Heller, K.J.; Schwarz, K. Influence of fermentation on glucosinolates and glucobrassicin degradation products in sauerkraut. Food Chem. 2016, 190, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Kim, M.R.; Lee, K.J.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.B.; Sok, D.E. Effect of various kimchi extracts on the hepatic glutathione S-transferase activiy of mice. Food Res. Int. 1999, 31, 389–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hong, E.; Kim, G.H. GC-MS analysis of the extracts from Korean cabbage (Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensis) and its seed. Prev. Nutr. Food Sci. 2013, 18, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kim, H.Y.; Min, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Ji, G.E. Growth of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria in natural media using vegetables, seaweeds, grains and potatoes. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2000, 9, 322–324. [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh, P.; Saini, P.; Puranik, V.; Gupta, S.; Dubey, S. Optimization and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactobacillus strains isolated from cabbage and cucumber. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res. 2016, 6, 27–35. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bhat, B.; Bajaj, B.K. Hypocholesterolemic and bioactive potential of exopolysaccharide from a probiotic Enterococcus faecium K1 isolated from kalarei. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 254, 264–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Nagaraj, K.; Devasya, R.P.; Bhagwath, A.A. Exopolysaccharide produced by Enterobacter sp. YG4 reduced uranium induced nephrotoxicity. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 82, 557–561. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sakanaka, S.; Tachibana, Y.; Okada, Y. Preparation and antioxidant properties of extracts of Japanese persimmon leaf tea (kakinoha-cha). Food Chem. 2005, 89, 569–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hunaefi, D.; Gruda, N.; Riedel, H.; Akumo, N.D.; Thaw Saw, N.M.M.; Smetanska, I. Improvement of antioxidant activities in red cabbage sprouts by lactic acid bacterial fermentation. Food Biotechnol. 2013, 27, 279–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vicaş, S.; Rugină, D.; Leopold, L.; Pintea, A.; Socaciu, C. HPLC fingerprint of bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of Viscum albumfrom different host trees. Notulae Botanicae 2011, 39, 48–57. [Google Scholar]
  43. Akowuah, G.A.; Ismail, Z.; Norhayati, I.; Sadikun, A. The effects of different extraction solvents of varying polarities of polyphenols of Orthosiphon stamineus and evaluation of the free radical-scavenging activity. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Benzie, I.F.F.; Strain, J.J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of antioxidant power: The FRAP Assay. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 239, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Seeram, N.P.; Adams, L.S.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, R.; Sand, D.; Scheuller, H.S.; Heber, D. Blackberry, black raspberry, blueberry, cranberry, red raspberry, and strawberry extracts inhibit growth and stimulate apoptosis of human cancer cells in vitro. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 9329–9339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: Samples of compounds 1–10 are not available from the authors.
Molecules 23 00955 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structures of GSLs 1–5 and ITC/NIT degradation products 6–10. (1) Glucosinolate (GSL) core structure with R group; (2) sinigrin; (3) glucoiberin; (4) glucoraphanin; (5) 4-hydroxy-glucobrassicin; (6) allyl isothiocyanate; (7) iberin nitrile; (8) iberin; (9) sulforaphane; and (10) indole-3-acetonitrile.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of GSLs 1–5 and ITC/NIT degradation products 6–10. (1) Glucosinolate (GSL) core structure with R group; (2) sinigrin; (3) glucoiberin; (4) glucoraphanin; (5) 4-hydroxy-glucobrassicin; (6) allyl isothiocyanate; (7) iberin nitrile; (8) iberin; (9) sulforaphane; and (10) indole-3-acetonitrile.
Molecules 23 00955 g001
Molecules 23 00955 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of GSL-metabolizing bacteria isolated in this study and previous reports [16,17,18,19,24], inferred from 16S rRNA partial sequences from different bacteria using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Le and Gascuel 2008 model. Percentage of replicate trees with associated taxa clustered together after bootstrapping (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Horizontal bars represent a distance of 0.5 substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted by MEGA7 and the phylogenetic tree was drawn using FigTree.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree of GSL-metabolizing bacteria isolated in this study and previous reports [16,17,18,19,24], inferred from 16S rRNA partial sequences from different bacteria using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Le and Gascuel 2008 model. Percentage of replicate trees with associated taxa clustered together after bootstrapping (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches. Horizontal bars represent a distance of 0.5 substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted by MEGA7 and the phylogenetic tree was drawn using FigTree.
Molecules 23 00955 g002
Molecules 23 00955 g003 550
Figure 3. Substrates and degradation products in Thai cabbage fermentations over 3 days. (A) HPLC chromatograms showing GSL profiles of fermented cabbage by EX from 0, 1, 2, 3 days (0 d, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d); (B) GC-MS chromatograms showing metabolic profiles of fermented cabbage by EX from 0, 1, 2, 3 days (0 d, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d). (3) Glucoiberin at 6.30 min; (4) Glucoraphanin at 9.44 min; (5) 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin at 12.5 min; (7) Iberin nitrile at 17.9 min; (8) Iberin at 24.9 min; (9) Sulforaphane at 28.9 min; and (10) Indole-3-acetonitrile at 30.2 min.
Figure 3. Substrates and degradation products in Thai cabbage fermentations over 3 days. (A) HPLC chromatograms showing GSL profiles of fermented cabbage by EX from 0, 1, 2, 3 days (0 d, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d); (B) GC-MS chromatograms showing metabolic profiles of fermented cabbage by EX from 0, 1, 2, 3 days (0 d, 1 d, 2 d, 3 d). (3) Glucoiberin at 6.30 min; (4) Glucoraphanin at 9.44 min; (5) 4-hydroxyglucobrassicin at 12.5 min; (7) Iberin nitrile at 17.9 min; (8) Iberin at 24.9 min; (9) Sulforaphane at 28.9 min; and (10) Indole-3-acetonitrile at 30.2 min.
Molecules 23 00955 g003
Molecules 23 00955 g004 550
Figure 4. Antioxidant activities from fermented cabbage with/without bacterial induction over 3 days. (A) DPPH scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity was expressed as % DPPH scavenging activity; (B) FRAP value. Antioxidant activity was expressed as FeSO4 mg/g DW; (C) ABTS radical scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity was expressed as vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VEAC) mg/g DW. EX = Fermented cabbage induced with EX for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (EX0, EX1, EX2, EX3); N = Non-induced with EX (spontaneous fermentation of cabbage) for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (N0, N1, N2, N3); Cabbage = Fresh cabbage without fermentation. Different small letters (a–d) above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Figure 4. Antioxidant activities from fermented cabbage with/without bacterial induction over 3 days. (A) DPPH scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity was expressed as % DPPH scavenging activity; (B) FRAP value. Antioxidant activity was expressed as FeSO4 mg/g DW; (C) ABTS radical scavenging activity. Antioxidant activity was expressed as vitamin C equivalent antioxidant capacity (VEAC) mg/g DW. EX = Fermented cabbage induced with EX for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (EX0, EX1, EX2, EX3); N = Non-induced with EX (spontaneous fermentation of cabbage) for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (N0, N1, N2, N3); Cabbage = Fresh cabbage without fermentation. Different small letters (a–d) above the bars indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
Molecules 23 00955 g004
Table
Table 1. Twenty bacterial isolates with GSL-metabolizing capacity isolated from local Thai fermented foods and drinks.
Table 1. Twenty bacterial isolates with GSL-metabolizing capacity isolated from local Thai fermented foods and drinks.
No.Accession no. aSpeciesClosest Relative Species b (% Identity)/Accession no. c/Origin of Isolate dSinigrin Degradation (nmol) AITC Product (nmol) % Product Formation e
1. Fermented cabbage pH 3.87
1LC342980.1Enterobacter sp. 1A-1AEnterobacter sp. Md1-53 (92%) MF581459.1 Paeonia ostii root, China73 ± 830 ± 541 ± 4
2LC342981.1 Enterobacter faecalis 5A-2BEnterococcus faecalis NW A20 (99%) MG543833.1 Raw meat, South Africa78 ± 739 ± 1150 ± 14
3LC342982.1Enterobacter asburiae 1B-1 Enterobacter asburiae voucher ST56 (100%) KT287073.1 Rumen, China75 ± 1133 ± 844 ± 6
4LC342983.1Enterobacter sp. 1B-2Enterobacter sp. NU33 (96%) MG459258.1 Plant growth-promoting bacteria in sugarcane, Brazil79 ± 541 ± 752 ± 8
5LC342984.1Enterobacter ludwigii S1E9Enterobacter ludwigii HTP04 (100%) KX024731.1 Shrimp gut, India90 ± 850 ± 956 ± 7
6LC342985.1 Enterococcus casseliflavus SB2X2Enterococcus casseliflavus HMF4406 (98%) KT984002.1 Jeotgal (salted fermented food), Korea100 ± 061 ± 461 ± 6
7LC342986.1Bacillus sp. SA8Bacillus sp. SK123 (97%) KU060226.1 Honey bee apiary, Thailand79 ± 839 ± 749 ± 6
8LC342987.1Bacillus sp. 1.1Bacillus sp. BDU13 (96%) JX847614.1 Fermented fish, India87 ± 10 42 ± 1148 ± 10
2. Pickled onion pH 4.81
9LC342980.1Enterobacter sp. 1A-1AEnterobacter sp. Md1-53 (92%) MF581459.1 Paeonia ostii root, China 73 ± 5 40 ± 555 ± 4
10LC342988.1Enterobacter sp. 2B-1BEnterobacter sp. SR19 (100%) KF896099.1 Seawater sediment, Belgium71 ± 039 ± 355 ± 6
3. Fermented fish pH 4.60
11LC342989.1Enterobacter xiangfangensis 4A-2A3.1Enterobacter xiangfangensis W31 (100%) KP813789.1 Storm water bacteria in two urban lakes, China100 ± 065 ± 365 ± 4
12LC342990.1 Bacillus sp. 4A-1Bacillus sp. S42 (100%) JX293317.1 Crystal tuff, China71 ± 640 ± 456 ± 1
13LC342991.1 Bacillus sp. 4B1Bacillus sp. SO5.17 (97%) KC867296.1 Mine drainage, Brazil73 ± 442 ± 958 ± 13
4. Fermented pork pH 4.73
14LC342992.1 Enterococcus casseliflavus 3.10A1Enterococcus casseliflavus JFL12 (100%) KT343156.1 Fiber-degrading bacteria in rumen of Tibetan yak, China74 ± 1335 ± 847 ± 4
5. Fermented herbal drink pH 2.80
15LC342981.1 Enterobacter faecalis 5A-2BEnterococcus faecalis NW A20 (99%) MG543833.1 Raw meat, South Africa78 ± 735 ± 645 ± 5
6. Fermented juice pH 2.93
16LC342993.1Enterobacter sp. 10-B1Enterobacter sp. DBM3 (97%) KT957440.1 Plutella xylostella larval gut, China77 ± 534 ± 1142 ± 16
17LC342980.1Enterobacter sp. 1A-1AEnterobacter sp. Md1-53 (92%) MF581459.1 Paeonia ostii root, China73 ± 1034 ± 847 ± 7
7. Water kefir from Nakhon Ratchasima pH 5.94
18LC336444.1Lactococcus hircilactis WS16Lactococcus hircilactis DSM 28960 (100%) KJ201026.1 Goat milk, Italy77 ± 4Ndna
19LC336446.1Lactococcus lactis WS18Lactococcus lactis RCB787 (98%) KT260999.1 Bat guano, India78 ± 3Ndna
8. Milk kefir from Kamphaeng Phet pH 5.23
20LC342994.1Bacillus subtilis KW3Bacillus subtilis MA-48 (93%) KX426648.1 Rhizospheric soil in desert, Pakistan80 ± 9ndna
a GenBank accession no. of our strains deposited on NCBI website (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed); b Closest relative species and identity (%) from BLAST search on NCBI website; c GenBank accession no. of closest relatives on NCBI website; d Origins of closest relative species i.e., where each bacterium was isolated from; e % product formation = [AITC product (nmol)/sinigrin degradation (nmol)] × 100%. nd = not detected; na = not available. Each isolate from fermented samples was cultured in LB medium containing 1 mM sinigrin for 24 h. After that sinigrin degradation and AITC production were determined by HPLC and GC-MS, respectively.
Table
Table 2. Metabolism of GSLs and formation of ITCs and NITs in fermented cabbage with/without bacterial induction over 3 days.
Table 2. Metabolism of GSLs and formation of ITCs and NITs in fermented cabbage with/without bacterial induction over 3 days.
SamplesRemaining GSLs (µmol/100 g Dry Weight)Products (µmol/100 g Dry Weight)
GIBGRPGBSIBNIBRSFNIAN
Cabbage430.5 ± 34.1aB615.1 ± 30.0aA108.5 ± 19.1aC75.1 ± 26.4aC13.3 ± 10.0bD39.5 ± 16.3dC49.1 ± 29.8abC
N0273.8 ± 15.8bB534.4 ± 30.4abA30.2 ± 4.4bC61.82 ± 28.4abC11.2 ± 6.0bD56.2 ± 26.0dC52.4 ± 19.1abC
N1103.8 ± 19.5cB419.0 ± 26.5cA0.0 + 0.0cE43.3 ± 23.2abC32.1 ± 3.9bD135.2 ± 42.0abB22.9 ± 4.7abC
N220.9 ± 12.0dB217.5 ± 14.8deA0.0 + 0.0cC35.2 ± 15.4abB11.57 ± 5.8bD127.9 ± 60.0abA15.8 ± 2.0bB
N32.9 ± 1.1dC146.3 ± 27.7deA0.0 + 0.0cD21.6 ± 11.0bcB8.6 ± 3.9bB112.2 ± 52.0abA10.7 ± 3.1bB
EC0305.7 ± 29.8bB514.2 ± 42.6bA27.4 ± 6.9bD64.3 ± 23.3abC15.4 ± 5.9bD45.6 ± 22.0dC60.5 ± 21.8aC
EC191.8 ± 17.3cC359.9 ± 31.8cdA0.0 + 0.0cE25.6 ± 12.6abD35.2 ± 20.0bD177.8 ± 42.0abB22.5 ± 14.6abD
EC221.0 ± 9.3dB211.0 ± 27.7deA0.0 + 0.0cD6.4 ± 2.1cC51.7 ± 35.9abB242.6 ± 40.0aA14.7 ± 11.9abB
EC33.1 ± 0.7dD111 ± 20.2fB0.0 + 0.0cE2.9 ± 0.8cD33.6 ± 22.0bC222.4 ± 42.0aA16.4 ± 7.2abC
EX0305.2 ± 13.0bB536.6 ± 29.1abA31.6 ± 7.8aC65.2 ± 20.2abC12.5 ± 4.0bD48.6 ± 30.0dC55.3 ± 20.2abC
EX174.3 ± 14.6cC275.9 ± 19.deA0.0 + 0.0cF26.6 ± 12.3abD117.4 ± 41.9aB294.1 ± 44.0aA7.7 ± 3.7bE
EX211.1 ± 6.4dD160.8 ± 29.0eB0.0 + 0.0cE6.5 ± 3.8cD78.2 ± 38.0abC252.6 ± 46.0aA16.3 ± 7.4abD
EX32.4 ± 0.6dD85.3 ± 24.7fB0.0 + 0.0cE13.8 ± 3.1bcC70.5 ± 39.9abB244.7 ± 70.0aA20.9 ± 8.8abC
EC2 solid5.2 ± 1.6dC93.3 ± 23.6fA0.0 + 0.0cD3.6 ± 2.3cC19.2 ± 10.0bB69.7 ± 34.0cA5.9 ± 1.2bB
EC2 liquid16.3 ± 7.5dC117.7 ± 34.4fB0.0 + 0.0cF3.5 ± 0.7cE30.8 ± 22.0bC173.3 ± 48.0abA10.4 ± 1.3bD
Cabbage = fresh cabbage; N = Non-induced with bacteria (spontaneous fermentation of cabbage) for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (N0, N1, N2, N3); EC = Fermented cabbage induced with EC for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (EC0, EC1, EC2, EC3); EX = Fermented cabbage induced with EX for 0, 1, 2, 3 days (EX0, EX1, EX2, EX3); EC2 solid = Solid portion of fermented cabbage by EC at day 2; EC2 liquid = Liquid portion of fermented cabbage by EC at day 2. Different small letters within the same column and capital letters within the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.01) according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luang-In, V.; Deeseenthum, S.; Udomwong, P.; Saengha, W.; Gregori, M. Formation of Sulforaphane and Iberin Products from Thai Cabbage Fermented by Myrosinase-Positive Bacteria. Molecules 2018, 23, 955. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040955

AMA Style

Luang-In V, Deeseenthum S, Udomwong P, Saengha W, Gregori M. Formation of Sulforaphane and Iberin Products from Thai Cabbage Fermented by Myrosinase-Positive Bacteria. Molecules. 2018; 23(4):955. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040955

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luang-In, Vijitra, Sirirat Deeseenthum, Piyachat Udomwong, Worachot Saengha, and Matteo Gregori. 2018. "Formation of Sulforaphane and Iberin Products from Thai Cabbage Fermented by Myrosinase-Positive Bacteria" Molecules 23, no. 4: 955. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040955

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop