Next Article in Journal
Anticancer and Immunogenic Properties of Cardiac Glycosides
Next Article in Special Issue
Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents (NADES) to Enhance Berberine Absorption: An In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Study
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Synthesis of Spiroheterocycles via N-Heterocyclic Carbene Organocatalysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chokeberry Pomace as a Determinant of Antioxidant Parameters Assayed in Blood and Liver Tissue of Polish Merino and Wrzosówka Lambs
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 22
Issue 11
10.3390/molecules22111923
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Fangchinoline Derivatives

by
Yazhou Liu
1,2,†,
Bin Xia
1,2,†,
Junjie Lan
1,2,
Shengcao Hu
1,2,
Lan Huang
1,2,
Chao Chen
1,2,
Xueyi Zeng
1,2,
Huayong Lou
1,2,
Changhu Lin
1,* and
Weidong Pan
1,2,*
1
State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University, 3491 Baijin Road, Guiyang 550014, China
2
The Key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, 3491 Baijin Road, Guiyang 550014, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Molecules 2017, 22(11), 1923; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111923
Submission received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 1 November 2017 / Accepted: 5 November 2017 / Published: 8 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from the 46th EuroCongress on Drug Synthesis and Analysis (ECDSA-2017))
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Twenty fangchinoline derivatives were synthesized from the natural product fangchinoline, and their anticancer activities on human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell line, human prostate cancer PC3 cell line, human melanoma WM9 cell line and human leukaemia HEL and K562 cell lines were evaluated. The biological result showed that those derivatives exhibited potent activities on inhibiting cancer cell growth, and the structure-activity relationships were investigated. Among them, compound 4g, which was protected by benzoyl group in 7-phenolic position and nitrified in 14-position, showed impressive inhibition on all 5 cancer cell lines, especially WM9 cell line, with an IC50 value of 1.07 µM. Further mechanistic studies demonstrated that compound 4g may induce cancer cell death by apoptotic means. These research results suggested that compound 4g could be a lead for the further development toward an anticancer agent against human melanoma WM9 in the future.

1. Introduction

Cancer is one the most crucial public health concerns across the world. Based on the estimation of the World Health Organization (WHO), 8.8 million people died from cancer in 2015, occupying 16.7% of all global death [1]. According to the world cancer report, breast cancer has the highest incidence among women (43.3 per 100,000) while prostate cancer has the second-highest among men (31.1 per 100,000) [2]. Melanoma is another aggressive human cancer, the incidence of which has dramatically increased during the past decades, although racial difference varies the risk of developing this kind of cancer [3]. Leukaemia usually begins in bone marrow, and results in large numbers of abnormal white blood cells, which occurs most often in adults older than 55 years and children younger than 15 years [4].
Chemotherapy remains one of the most important methods for cancer treatment [5,6]. Natural products play an important role in the context of anti-cancer drug discovery. Statistics data indicates that more than 50% of drugs were derived from natural products, either natural origins or derivatives of natural origins [7,8,9]. Fangchinoline and tetrandrine (Figure 1) are two bisbenzylisoquinoline alkaloids isolated from a Chinese traditional herb Stephaniae tetrandra S. Moore, which is mainly used as an analgesic and anti-hypertension agent in China [10]. Many bioactivities have been discovered since fangchinoline and tetrandrine were isolated as two of the main active ingredients in S. tetrandra [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Our group has previously reported that fangchinoline could induce autophagy via P53/sestrin2/AMPK signalling in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, HepG2, and PLC/PRF/5 at relatively low concentrations (IC50 was approximately 5 µM) [19]. While tetrandrine, which has similar chemical structure, has been reported to arrest the G1/S and G2/M cell cycle and stimulate apoptotic cell death and autophagy via PKC-alpha Inhibition and mTOR-Dependent Mechanisms [16,17,19]. Several derivatives of tetrandrine have been synthesized and evaluated by our team since the unique activity was discovered [20,21]. However, little research about the derivatization and evaluation of fangchinoline has been released.
One of the hallmarks of cancer is the dysregulation of the apoptotic pathways in cells [22,23]. Apoptosis (programmed cell death), often occurs in multicellular organisms to eliminate unnecessary and unwanted cells [24,25]. Many changes occur, including blebbing, cell shrinkage, and nuclear fragmentation, while the apoptosis takes place [26]. Much research has revealed revealed that intracellular proteolytic cascade mediates this kind of cell death, believing that the inhibitor of the apoptosis family of proteins and Bcl-2 family of intracellular proteins are the main intracellular regulators of apoptosis [27]. The intrinsic pathway (also called the mitochondrial pathway) and the extrinsic pathway are the two main pathways of apoptosis [28].
Here, we describe the design and synthesis of fangchinoline derivatives. The biological activities on several cancer cell lines, including human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell line, human prostate cancer PC3 cell line, human melanoma WM9 cell line and human leukaemia HEL and K562 cell lines, were evaluated, followed by the proposed structure activity relationships. Moreover, the primary mechanism of action was also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

Twenty fangchinoline derivatives were designed and synthesized. The derivatization of fangchinoline is summarized in Scheme 1. The strategy of derivatization is to protect 7-phenolic position with different groups then introduce halogens or nitryl on 5- and/or 14-position(s) to form the “first stage” and “second stage” analogues. For the first stage, compounds 1a to 1c are the primary ether-protected derivatives, while compounds 3a to 3i are protected by acyl groups. Both of these two series of primary analogues were formed through routes I and III respectively. Then, halogens and nitro group were induced to some of those primary analogues as the secondary stage, forming compound 2a and compounds 4a to 4g for the purpose of obtaining improved anticancer activities by routes II and IV.

2.2. Biological Evaluation

2.2.1. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

As summarized in Table 1, five cancer cell lines, including MDA-MB-231, PC3, WM9, HEL and K562 cell lines, were induced for testing the anti-cancer activities of those derivatives. The first line anti-cancer drug, vincristine, was treated as positive control. All the test compounds were dissolved in DMSO. The preliminary structure-activity relationship of all compounds against the 5 cancer cell lines was also investigated.
The anticancer activities of those derivatives were obviously enhanced compared to the starting material, fangchinoline. Most anticancer activities of those derivatives were at the same level or exceed the positive control. To be specific, when we compared the activities on HEL cell line, the “first stage” products (1a to 1c and 3a to 3i) showed better anticancer activities than the “secondary stage” products. For the “first stage” products, with the inducing of the protecting groups on 7-phenolic hydroxy, both the “ester” compounds (3a, 3d to 3i) and “ether” compounds (1a to 1c) exhibited better results than the “sulfonate” compounds (3b and 3c), for which the former two series of compounds were the same level as that of vincristine. For the PC3 cell line, the “secondary stage” products showed better inhibition activities than “first stage” products with most of their IC50 lower than their starting products. One thing should be mentioned; compounds 3a and 3i, which were protected by acetyl and propionyl groups, displayed better activities in “first stage” products with IC50 values of 3.01 µM and 2.51 µM, respectively, than those of the “aromatic” esters (3d to 3g and 3i) and “aromatic” sulfonate (3b and 3c). For the WM9 cell line, all the derivatives showed better inhibition than fangchinoline and vincristine. When comparing the “first stage” compounds to the “secondary stage” compounds, the halogenated “secondary stage” compounds (4a to 4f) were weaker than their starting “first stage” compounds (3a and 3i), while the nitrified compounds (2a and 4g) were stronger than their starting compounds (1a and 3i), with IC50 values of 3.04 µM and 1.07 µM, respectively. For the K562 cell line, the “secondary stage” compounds generally showed better inhibition than the “first stages” compounds. The halogenated “secondary stage” compounds showed better inhibition of cell growth than nitrified “secondary stage” compounds. For the MDA-MB-231 cell line, the inhibitory activities of those compounds were similar to their inhibitory activities against K562 cell line.
3 fangchinoline derivatives were also tested for their toxicities on normal human liver cell line HL7702. The IC50 values for compounds 3g and 4g against HL7702 cell growth were 17.26 µM and 5.00 µM, respectively, which were relatively 3 and 5 fold lower than their inhibition on cancer cell lines. Whereas, compound 2a seemed more toxic against HL7702 cell (IC50 = 5.60 µM) than on cancer cell lines.

2.2.2. The Annexin V-FITC/PI Flow Cytometry Assay

The Annexin V-FITC-A/PI apoptosis detection kit was induced to test the further role of compound 4g in inhibiting WM9 cell death (Figure 2). Before undergoing the flow cytometry, the WM9 cells were treated with 0 and 2.5 µM compound 4g for 24 h, and then Annexin V-FITC and PI were put into use. As shown in Figure 2, the WM9 cells which were treated with fangchinoline derivative 4g showed 8.8% in the early apoptosis state and 15.8% in the late apoptosis state, which is significant higher than the control WM9 cells (0.0% and 0.3% in early and late apoptosis states, respectively). The flow cytometry result showed that compound 4g could induce apoptosis in WM9 cell line.

2.2.3. The Fangchinoline Derivative 4g Affects the Protein Levels of Apoptosis Indicators in WM9 Cell Line

Western blot analysis was induced to elucidate the effect of compound 4g on protein levels to further expatiate how compound 4g induces apoptosis in WM9 cells (Figure 3). The Bcl-xl, Bcl-2 and Survivin display repressor activities in cell death [29]. As shown in Figure 3, 4g inhibited the Bcl-xl, Survivin and Bcl-2 expression, which is evidence of the activated mitochondrial pathway of cell apoptosis [30]. The activation of executioner from Pro-Caspase-3 to Cleaved-Caspase-3, which is also shown in Figure 3, means that apoptosis is being executed. The down-regulation of full-length PARP (the degradation of poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase), indirectly proved the up-regulation Cleaved-PARP, which could obliterate DNA repair and induce apoptosis in cells.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Method of Synthesis

The reagents and solvents were purchased commercially from Adamas and J&K chemical and were used without further purification unless otherwise noted. The solvents were purified according to the Guidelines in Purification of Laboratory Chemicals. Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (200–300 mesh, Qingdao, Shandong, China) using the indicated eluents. Thin-layer (0.25 mm, GF254) chromatography was carried out on silica gel plates (Qingdao, Shandong, China). NMR spectra were recorded on 400 MHz (Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) or spectrometers in appropriate solvents using TMS as internal standard or the solvent signals as secondary standards and the chemical shifts are shown in δ scales. Multiplicities of NMR signals were designated as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet), br (broad), and m (multiplet, for unresolved lines). 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on 100 MHz or spectrometers. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained by using ESI-QTOF (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) mass spectrometry.

3.1.1. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 1a to 1c

To a solution of fangchinoline (0.16 mmol, 1 eq.) in 5 mL dimethylformamide under protection of argon at ambient temperature, sodium hydride (0.2 mmol, 55%, 1.2 eq.) was added and stirred for 10 min. Then the halide (0.2 mmol, 1.2 eq.) was added dropwise and stirred for 8 to 12 h. The mixture was poured into ammonium chloride solution with ice water bath. The aqueous phase was extracted with 2 × 30 mL of dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried on magnesium sulfonate, followed by removal of the solvent by rotavapor. The crude mixture was purified over by column chromatography (silica, eluent: DCM:MeOH = 50:1) to afford the pure product.
7-O-Benzyl-fangchinoline (1a) white amorphous solid: yield 83%. C44H46N2O6 ESI-MS: m/z 698.86 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.34 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.22 (3H, m), 7.15 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz), 7.00 (2H, m), 6.88 (2H, m), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.51 (1H, s), 6.33 (1H, s), 6.31 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.86 (1H, s), 4.61 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 4.26 (1H, d, J = 10.4 Hz), 3.94 (3H, s), 3.76 (1H, m), 3.73 (3H, s), 3.51 (3H, m), 3.37 (3H, s), 3.31–2.55 (8H, m), 2.53 (2H, m), 2.50 (3H, s), 2.35 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 154.0, 151.6, 149.5, 148.9, 148.8, 147.2, 144.2, 137.6, 136.7, 134.7, 132.7, 130.3, 128.4, 128.4, 128.1, 128.1, 128.1, 128.1, 128.1, 127.7, 127.7, 127.7, 123.0, 122.1, 122.1, 120.5, 116.2, 112.9, 111.6, 106.1, 74.5, 64.2, 61.7, 56.2, 56.0, 55.9, 45.5, 42.5, 42.3, 42.0, 40.3, 37.2, 24.5, 22.8.
7-O-(3-Methylbut-1-ene)-fangchinoline (1b) off-yellow amorphous solid: yield 57%. C42H48NO6 ESI-MS: m/z 676.85 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.37 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.15 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz), 6.92 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-14), 6.88 (1H, s), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.83 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.54 (1H, d, J = 1.6 Hz), 6.51 (1H, s), 6.33 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.31 (1H, s), 5.96 (1H, s), 4.83 (1H, dd, J = 6.4, 7.6 Hz), 4.00 (1H, m), 3.94 (3H, s), 3.84 (1H, m), 3.75 (3H, s), 3.55 (2H, m), 3.37 (3H, s), 3.33 (1H, m), 2.97-2.70 (8H, m), 2.64 (3H, s), 2.52 (2H, m), 2.35 (3H, s), 1.60 (3H, s, –CH3–), 1.52 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 153.8, 151.7, 149.4, 148.8, 148.7, 147.1, 143.9, 136.8, 136.6, 135.2, 134.8, 132.8, 130.3, 128.1, 128.1, 127.3, 122.8, 122.1, 122.0, 120.6, 120.3, 116.1, 112.7, 111.5, 105.6, 69.3, 64.5, 61.6, 56.2, 55.9, 55.8, 45.7, 44.3, 42.7, 42.4, 42.0, 41.0, 29.8, 25.8, 24.4, 22.8, 22.2.
7-O-(Prop-1-ene)-fangchinoline (1c) off-yellow amorphous solid: yield 71%. C40H44N2O6 ESI-MS: m/z 648.80 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.37 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-14′), 7.15 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.87 (2H, s, H-13), 6.82 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.54 (1H, s), 6.51 (1H, s), 6.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.31 (1H, s), 5.96 (1H, s), 5.45 (1H, m), 4.95 (2H, m), 4.05 (1H, dd, J = 5.2, 11.6 Hz), 3.93 (3H, s), 3.86 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 11.2 Hz), 3.78 (2H, m), 3.74 (3H, s), 3.53 (2H, m), 3.37 (3H, s), 3.01–2.68 (8H, m), 2.60 (3H, s), 2.48 (2H, m), 2.33 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 153.6, 151.4, 149.3, 148.5, 148.4, 146.9, 143.7, 136.3, 135.0, 134.6, 133.9, 132.6, 130.1, 128.2, 128.0, 127.4, 122.8, 122.7, 121.9, 121.8, 120.3, 116.8, 115.9, 112.6, 111.3, 105.6, 73.4, 64.2, 61.3, 56.0, 55.7, 55.6, 45.4, 44.0, 42.5, 42.2, 41.8, 40.7, 24.1, 22.0.

3.1.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 3a to 3i

To a solution of fangchinoline (0.16 mmol, 1 eq.) in 5 mL dichloromethane with the protection of argon at ambient temperature, acyl halide (0.18 mmol, 1.1 eq.) and DMAP (0.04 mmol, 0.25 eq.) were added and stirred for 1.5 h. The reaction was poured into 10 mL saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and exacted with 2 × 30 mL of dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried by magnesium sulfonate, followed by removal of the solvent by rotavapor. The residue was purified by column chromatography (silica, eluent: DCM:MeOH = 50:1) to afford the pure product.
7-O-Acetyl-fangchinoline (3a) off-white amorphous solid: yield 96%. C39H42N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 650.77 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.8, 8.4 Hz), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.85 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.57 (1H, s), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.05 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74–3.36 (3H, m), 3.35 (3H, s), 3.23 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12.4 Hz), 3.00–2.69 (7H, m), 2.61 (3H, s), 2.55–2.34 (2H, m), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.9, 154.3, 151.9, 148.7, 147.6, 147.2, 146.5, 141.3, 140.1, 135.7, 133.5, 132.5, 130.8, 129.1, 127.8, 122.1, 121.9, 121.8, 121.5, 120.1, 115.8, 111.6, 104.3, 63.6, 61.9, 56.2, 55.4, 50.8, 45.6, 44.1, 42.6, 42.1, 41.8, 39.7, 29.7, 25.5, 23.3.
7-O-Tosyl-fangchinoline (3b) yellow amorphous solid: yield 90%. C44H46N2O8S ESI-MS: m/z 762.29 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.75 (2H, s), 7.50 (2H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 15.2 Hz), 7.35 (2H, d, J = 6.6 Hz), 7.15 (2H, d, J = 6.4 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.92 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 155.0, 149.9, 148.5, 148.0, 147.1, 144.2, 144.0, 138.8, 134.9, 132.7, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.9, 128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-(o-Nirtobenzessulfonyl)-fangchinoline (3c) yellow amorphous solid: yield 90%. C44H46N3O10S ESI-MS: m/z 793.89 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.50 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 8.01–8.05 (3H, m), 7.35 (2H, dd, J = 2.6, 8.6 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.92 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 155.0, 149.9, 148.5, 148.0, 148.0, 147.1, 144.2, 144.0, 138.8, 136.3, 134.9, 133.4, 130.4, 128.9, 128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 125.2, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-(p-Nitro-benzoyl)-fangchinoline (3d) yellow amorphous solid: 90%. C44H43N3O9 ESI-MS: m/z 757.84 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.30–8.38 (4H, m), 7.35 (2H, dd, J = 2.2, 8.2 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.90 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 2.36–3.41 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ 165.2, 154.2, 153.1, 149.9, 149.6, 148.3, 148.1, 147.2, 144.9, 133.6, 132.7, 132.7, 132.3, 131.3, 131.3, 128.5, 128.5, 128.2 127.8, 126.1, 123.8, 123.8, 123.0, 123.0, 121.6, 121.6, 119.5, 117.8, 110.2, 110.1, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 22.8.
7-O-(p-Methyl-benzoyl)-fangchinoline (3e) brown amorphous solid: yield 95%. C45H46N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 726.86 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.03 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.35 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.90 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.41 (3H, s), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3,100 MHz) δ (ppm): 165.2, 154.2, 153.1, 149.9, 149.6, 148.3, 148.1, 147.2, 144.9, 133.6, 132.7, 132.7, 132.3, 130.2, 130.2, 128.8, 128.8, 128.2 127.8, 126.1, 123.8, 123.8, 123.0, 123.0, 121.6, 121.6, 119.5, 117.8, 110.2, 110.1, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 22.8.
7-O-(p-Methoxy-benzoyl)-fangchinoline (3f) yellow amorphous solid: yield 91%. C45H46N2O8 ESI-MS: m/z 742.87 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.13 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.42 (2H, dd, J = 2.2, 8.2 Hz), 7.35 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.90 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.83 (3H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.41 (3H, s), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.8, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 131.2, 131.2, 130.4, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 114.2, 114.2, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-(Furan-m-formyl)-fangchinoline (3g) yellow amorphous solid: yield 90%. C44H44N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 702.80 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.97 (1H, m), 7.63 (1H, m), 7.35 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.15 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.90 (1H, s), 6.83 (3H, m), 6.52 (1H, s), 4.57 (2H, m), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.90 (6H, s), 3.83 (3H, s), 3.81(3H, s), 3.00 (4H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.41 (3H, s), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 177.5, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 145.6, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 118.6, 116.0, 112.8, 112.0, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-Propionyl-fangchinoline (3h) light yellow amorphous solid: yield 88%. C40H44N2O7, ESI-MS: m/z 664.80 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.48 (1H, s), 6.43 (1H, s), 6.24 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 5.91 (1H, s), 5.68 (1H, s), 3.93 (3H, s), 3.72 (1H, m), 3.61 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.00 (3H, s), 2.85 (1H, m), 2.73 (3H, m), 2.64 (3H, m), 2.43 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 172.6, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 27.8, 24.6, 22.8, 11.5.
7-O-Benzoyl-fangchinoline (3i) light yellow amorphous solid: yield 97%. C44H44N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 712.84 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.16 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.78 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 15.2 Hz), 7.34 (2H, m), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.87 (1H, s), 6.77 (1H, m), 6.60 (1H, s), 6.44 (1H, s), 6.39 (1H, s), 6.24 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.69 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.8, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.9, 128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.

3.1.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of 4a to 4h

7-O-Benzoyl-fangchinoline (3i, 0.16 mmol, 1 eq.) or 7-O-Acetyl-fangchinoline (3a, 0.16 mmol, 1 eq.) was added to 5 mL of trifluoracetic acid at 0 °C, and N-bromosuccinimide (0.18 mmol, 1.1 eq.) was added all at once and stirred for 10 min. Then, the reaction mixture was warmed up to room temperature and stirred for another 3 h. The mixture was then poured into ice-water and aqueous sodium bicarbonate was added dropwise until pH was about 8. The aqueous phase was exacted with 2 × 30 mL of dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried by magnesium sulfonate, followed by removal of the solvent by rotavapor. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (silica, eluent: DCM:MeOH = 30:1) to afford compound 4c.
For compound 4f, 1.1 eq. of N-chlorosuccinimide was added, while the other procedures were the same.
For compounds 4a, 4b, 4d and 4e, 2.2 eq. of N-bromosuccinimide or N-chlorosuccinimide was added, while the other procedures were the same.
7-O-Benzoyl-5,14-dibromo-fangchinoline (4a) brown amorphous solid: yield 63%. C44H42Br2N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 870.64 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.16 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.78 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 15.2 Hz), 7.34 (2H, m), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.60 (1H, s), 6.44 (1H, s), 6.39 (1H, s), 6.24 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.69 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.8, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.9, 128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 115.7, 112.8, 112.5, 111.5, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-Benzoyl-5,14-dichloro-fangchinoline (4b) dark yellow amorphous solid: yield 79%. C44H42Cl2N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 781.73 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.16 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.78 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 15.2 Hz), 7.34 (2H, m), 7.10 (1H, s), 6.60 (1H, s), 6.44 (1H, s), 6.39 (1H, s), 6.24 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.69 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.8, 153.7, 149.5, 147.0, 142.8, 134.9, 134.8, 133.1, 132.7, 132.5, 130.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.9, 128.9, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 114.7, 114.1, 112.8, 111.5, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.
7-O-Acetyl-5-bromo-fangchinoline (4c) light yellow amorphous solid: yield 75%. C39H41BrN2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 729.67 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.8, 8.4 Hz), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.85 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.05 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74–3.36 (3H, m), 3.35 (3H, s), 3.23 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12.4 Hz), 3.00–2.69 (7H, m), 2.61 (3H, s), 2.55–2.34 (2H, m), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.9, 154.3, 151.9, 148.7, 147.6, 147.2, 146.5, 141.3, 140.1, 135.7, 133.5, 132.5, 130.8, 129.1, 127.8, 122.1, 121.9, 121.8, 121.5, 120.1, 115.8, 112.5, 111.6, 63.6, 61.9, 56.2, 55.4, 50.8, 45.6, 44.1, 42.6, 42.1, 41.8, 39.7, 29.7, 25.5, 23.3.
7-O-Acetyl-5,14-dibromo-fangchinoline (4d) yellow amorphous solid: yield 50%. C39H40Br2N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 808.56 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.8, 8.4 Hz), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.05 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74–3.36 (3H, m), 3.35 (3H, s), 3.23 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12.4 Hz), 3.00–2.69 (7H, m), 2.61 (3H, s), 2.55–2.34 (2H, m), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.9, 154.3, 151.9, 148.7, 147.6, 147.2, 146.5, 141.3, 140.1, 135.7, 133.5, 132.5, 130.8, 129.1, 127.8, 122.1, 121.8, 121.5, 120.1, 115.8, 115.0, 112.5, 111.6, 63.6, 61.9, 56.2, 55.4, 50.8, 45.6, 44.1, 42.6, 42.1, 41.8, 39.7, 29.7, 25.5, 23.3.
7-O-Acetyl-5,14-dichloro-fangchinoline (4e) yellow amorphous solid: yield 43%. C39H40Cl2N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 719.66 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.8, 8.4 Hz), 6.85 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.05 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74–3.36 (3H, m), 3.35 (3H, s), 3.23 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12.4 Hz), 3.00–2.69 (7H, m), 2.61 (3H, s), 2.55–2.34 (2H, m), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.9, 154.3, 151.9, 148.7, 147.6, 147.2, 146.5, 141.3, 140.1, 135.7, 133.5, 132.5, 130.8, 129.1, 127.7, 122.1, 121.8, 121.5, 120.1, 115.8, 114.1, 112.5, 111.6, 63.6, 61.9, 56.2, 55.4, 50.8, 45.6, 44.1, 42.6, 42.1, 41.8, 39.7, 29.7, 25.5, 23.3.
7-O-Acetyl-5-chloro-fangchinoline (4f) yellow amorphous solid: yield 69%. C39H41BrN2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 729.67 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.33 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.8, 8.4 Hz), 6.86 (1H, s), 6.85 (1H, s), 6.80 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.4 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.32 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 6.28 (1H, s), 6.05 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.88 (1H, dd, J = 5.6, 11.2 Hz), 3.76 (3H, s), 3.74–3.36 (3H, m), 3.35 (3H, s), 3.23 (1H, dd, J = 6.0, 12.4 Hz), 3.00–2.69 (7H, m), 2.61 (3H, s), 2.55–2.34 (2H, m), 2.28 (3H, s), 2.32 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.9, 154.3, 151.9, 148.7, 147.6, 147.2, 146.5, 141.3, 140.1, 135.7, 133.5, 132.5, 130.8, 129.1, 127.8, 122.1, 121.9, 121.8, 121.5, 120.1, 115.8, 112.5, 111.6, 63.6, 61.9, 56.2, 55.4, 50.8, 45.6, 44.1, 42.6, 42.1, 41.8, 39.7, 29.7, 25.5, 23.3.

3.1.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Compounds 2a and 4g

Under the protection of argon, concentrated nitric acid (0.6 mL) was carefully dropped into the acetic anhydride (1.5 mL) in a pre-dried 10 mL round flask and stirred for 5 min at −10 °C to obtain the mixed acid. 7-Benzyl-fangchinoline (1a, 0.80 mmol, 1 eq.) or 7-O-Benzoyl-fangchinoline (3i, 0.80 mmol, 1eq.) dissolved in 3 mL dichloromethane was added into the mixed acid dropwise. The reaction was allowed to stir at room temperature for 70 min before 10 mL of water was added. The aqueous phase was exacted with 2 × 10 mL of dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried over magnesium sulfonate. The solvents were removed by rotavapor. The crude mixture was purified by column chromatography (silica, eluent: DCM:MeOH = 40:1) to afford the pure product.
7-Benzyl-14-nitro-fangchinoline (2a) yellow amorphous solid: yield 68%. C44H45N3O8 ESI-MS: m/z 743.86 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 7.42 (1H, s), 7.37 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz), 7.22 (1H, m), 7.21 (2H, d, J = 2.0 Hz), 7.13 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz), 6.99 (2H, m), 6.75 (1H, dd, J = 2.4, 8.0 Hz), 6.52 (1H, s), 6.51 (1H, s), 6.33 (1H, s), 6.29 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.4 Hz), 5.85 (1H, s), 4.58 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 4.28 (1H, d, J = 10.8 Hz), 3.99 (3H, s), 3.81 (2H, m), 3.72 (3H, s), 3.59 (2H, m), 3.38 (3H, s), 3.32–2.69 (8H, m), 2.54 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz), 2.49 (3H, s), 2.35 (1H, dd, J = 4.0, 16.8 Hz), 2.22 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 154.0, 153.3, 151.1, 148.6, 147.8, 144.2, 142.2, 138.6, 136.7, 132.5, 129.0, 129.0, 128.5, 128.5, 128.0, 127.9, 127.9, 127.8, 127.8, 127.7, 127.7, 127.7, 123.0, 122.1, 122.1, 120.5, 116.2, 112.9, 111.6, 106.1, 74.5, 64.2, 61.7, 56.2, 56.0, 55.9, 45.5, 42.5, 42.3, 42.0, 40.3, 37.2, 24.5, 22.8.
7-O-Benzoyl-14-nitro-fangchinoline (4g) light brown amorphous solid: yield 85%. C44H42Br2N2O7 ESI-MS: m/z 757.84 [M + H]+; 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) δ (ppm): 8.16 (2H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.0Hz), 7.78 (1H, s), 7.47 (2H, t, J = 15.2 Hz), 7.34 (2H, m), 6.66 (1H, s), 6.60 (1H, s), 6.44 (1H, s), 6.39 (1H, s), 6.24 (1H, m), 5.57 (1H, s), 3.92 (3H, s), 3.69 (3H, s), 3.55 (3H, m), 3.48 (3H, s), 3.41–2.36 (9H, m), 2.17 (3H, s), 1.89 (2H, m), 1.26 (3H, s); 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) δ (ppm): 163.6, 154.1, 152.9, 151.0, 149.4, 149.1, 148.8, 144.1, 142.7, 133.5, 132.4, 130.0, 130.0, 128.6, 128.6, 128.3, 128.3, 128.3, 128.0, 128.0, 122.8, 122.8, 122.3, 122.2, 121.8, 120.7, 116.0, 112.8, 111.5, 105.7, 64.0, 61.4, 56.2, 56.2, 56.1, 45.6, 44.0, 42.4, 41.9, 41.6, 41.3, 29.8, 24.6, 22.8.

3.2. Cell Lines and Cell Culture

Human erythroleukemic cell lines HEL and K562, human breast cell lines MDA-MB-231, human prostate cell lines PC3 and human melanoma cell lines WM9 were cultured in RPMI (HEL and K562) or DMEM (MDA-MB-231, PC3, WM9) medium (high glucose) supplemented with 5% FBS (HyClone, GE Healthcare, Parramatta, Australia) and 1% ampicillin/streptomycin.

3.3. In Vitro Drug Studies

Cells were cultured in 96-well plates at densities of 1 × 105/well. The plates were pre-incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to allow adaptation of cells prior to the addition of the test compounds. Then, compounds were added to cells in triplicate in several doses, and incubated for an additional 2 days. The 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were measured for fangchinoline derivatives using MTT (diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay.

3.4. Flow Cytometry

For apoptosis analysis, WM9 cells were incubated with compounds or DMSO as a vehicle control for 24 h. Cells were then washed with cold PBS, stained with Annexin V-FITC and Propidium Iodide (PI) using apoptosis detection Kit (BD Biosciences, Bergen, NJ, USA).

3.5. Western Blotting

The total protein was collected from WM9 cells using RIPA lysis buffer, and separated on 10% SDS Page, as described [31]. The protein was then transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, 0.2 µm) membrane, and blocked by 5% BSA solution for 2 h at room temperature. The membrane was then incubated with specific primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by incubation with corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 2 h at room temperature. Expression of particular proteins was measured by applying ECL select substrate (Li-Cor, Lincoln, NE, USA). Polyclonal rabbit antibody for Bcl-2 was obtained from Abcam (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); Bcl-xl, Survivin, Casepase-3 and PARP antibodies from Cell Signalling Technology (CST, Danvers, MA, USA) and GAPDH from Goodhere Biotechnology (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China).

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, 12 “first stage” and 8 “secondary stage” fangchinoline derivatives were designed and synthesized. The evaluation of their anti-cancer activity against HEL, PC3, WM9, K562, MDA-MB-231 cell lines were performed, and the results showed that the inhibitory activities of fangchinoline derivatives were significantly higher than those of the original compound fangchinoline and the positive control vincristine. Among them, the “secondary stage” derivative 4g exhibited the best inhibition activity on the WM9 cell line, with IC50 of values 1.07 µM, which is 2.5 times more active than the original “first stage” derivative 3i, 12.2 times more active than fangchinoline, and 9.8 times more active than vincristine. The SARs analysis showed that all of the fangchinoline derivatives were able to improve anti-cancer activities. Moreover, most of the “secondary stage” compounds showed improved anti-cancer activities in comparison to the “first stage” derivatives in PC3 cells, WM9 cells, and K562 cells. Furthermore, the mechanistic analyses indicated that fangchinoline derivative 4g could induce WM9 cell death by apoptotic means through suppression of the Bcl-2 family and activation of the caspase family with PARP. The present results suggest that compound 4g could be a lead for development of anti-WM9 agents in the future.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81360479), the Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province (QKHRC [2016]4037, QKHSY [2015]3030).

Author Contributions

Weidong Pan and Changhu Lin conceived and designed the research; Yazhou Liu designed the experiments; Yazhou Liu and Lan Huang performed the chemical experiments; Bin Xia, Junjie Lan and Chao Chen performed the biological test; Bin Xia, Huayong Lou, Shengcao Hu and Xueyi Zeng performed mechanistic research; Yazhou Liu, Bin Xia, Weidong Pan and Changhu Lin wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Implications of the SDGs for health monitoring—A challenge and an opportunity for all countries. In World Health Statistics 2016: Monitoring Health for the SDGs Sustainable Development Goals; WHO Press: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. McGuire, S. World cancer report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World health organization, international agency for research on cancer, who press, 2015. Adv. Nutr. 2016, 7, 418–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Torre, L.A.; Bray, F.; Siegel, R.L.; Ferlay, J.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2015, 65, 87–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ferrán, C.L.; Seisdedos, R.T. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2015. Lancet 2016, 388, 1545–1602. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sternberg, C.N.; Donat, S.M.; Bellmunt, J.; Millikan, R.E.; Stadler, W.; De Mulder, P.; Sherif, A.; von der Maase, H.; Tsukamoto, T.; Soloway, M.S. Chemotherapy for bladder cancer: Treatment guidelines for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, bladder preservation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and metastatic cancer. Urology 2007, 69, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zagouri, F.; Peroukidis, S.; Tzannis, K.; Kouloulias, V.; Bamias, A.; Hellenic Genito-Urinary Cancer Group. Current clinical practice guidelines on chemotherapy and radiotherapy for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial cancer: A systematic review and critical evaluation by the hellenic genito-urinary cancer group (hgucg). Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2015, 93, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Newman, D.J. Natural products as leads to potential drugs: An old process or the new hope for drug discovery? J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 2589–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs over the last 25 years. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 461–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Newman, D.J.; Cragg, G.M. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J. Nat. Prod. 2016, 79, 629–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Fabricant, D.S.; Farnsworth, N.R. The value of plants used in traditional medicine for drug discovery. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109 (Suppl. 1), 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Fang, L.H.; Zhang, Y.H.; Ku, B.S. Fangchinoline inhibited the antinociceptive effect of morphine in mice. Phytomedicine 2005, 12, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jiang, M.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y.; Jing, W.; Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Sun, B.; Wang, M.; Chen, P.; Liu, H.; et al. Reduction-sensitive paclitaxel prodrug self-assembled nanoparticles with tetrandrine effectively promote synergistic therapy against drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant breast cancer. Mol. Pharm. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kitano, A.; Yamanaka, O.; Ikeda, K.; Ishida-Nishikawa, I.; Okada, Y.; Shirai, K.; Saika, S. Tetrandrine suppresses activation of human subconjunctival fibroblasts in vitro. Curr. Eye Res. 2008, 33, 559–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lin, T.Y.; Lu, C.W.; Tien, L.T.; Chuang, S.H.; Wang, Y.R.; Chang, W.H.; Wang, S.J. Fangchinoline inhibits glutamate release from rat cerebral cortex nerve terminals (synaptosomes). Neurochem. Int. 2009, 54, 506–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Liu, T.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, C.; Zeng, C.; Xu, X.; Wu, G.; Huang, Z.; Li, W. Tetrandrine antagonizes acute megakaryoblastic leukemia growth by forcing autophagy-mediated differentiation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Meng, L.H.; Zhang, H.; Hayward, L.; Takemura, H.; Shao, R.G.; Pommier, Y. Tetrandrine induces early g1 arrest in human colon carcinoma cells by down-regulating the activity and inducing the degradation of g1-s-specific cyclin-dependent kinases and by inducing p53 and p21cip1. Cancer Res. 2004, 64, 9086–9092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wong, V.K.W.; Zeng, W.; Chen, J.; Yao, X.J.; Leung, E.L.H.; Wang, Q.Q.; Chiu, P.; Ko, B.C.B.; Law, B.Y.K. Tetrandrine, an activator of autophagy, induces autophagic cell death via pkc-alpha inhibition and mtor-dependent mechanisms. Front. Pharmacol. 2017, 8, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xing, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Pang, D. Fangchinoline induces g1 arrest in breast cancer cells through cell-cycle regulation. Phytother. Res. 2013, 27, 1790–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Wang, N.; Pan, W.; Zhu, M.; Zhang, M.; Hao, X.; Liang, G.; Feng, Y. Fangchinoline induces autophagic cell death via p53/sestrin2/ampk signalling in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 731–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lan, J.; Wang, N.; Huang, L.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Lou, H.; Chen, C.; Feng, Y.; Pan, W. Design and synthesis of novel tetrandrine derivatives as potential anti-tumor agents against human hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 127, 554–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, Y.; Huang, L.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, M.; Li, T.; Liang, G.; Pan, W. Syntheses and anti-cancer activities of derivatives of tetrandrine and fangchinoline. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2014, 30, 937–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation. Cell 2011, 144, 646–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alberts, B. Molecular Biology of the Cell; Garland Science: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hassan, M.; Watari, H.; AbuAlmaaty, A.; Ohba, Y.; Sakuragi, N. Apoptosis and molecular targeting therapy in cancer. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 150845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Caltabiano, R.; Leonardi, R.; Musumeci, G.; Bartoloni, G.; Rusu, M.C.; Almeida, L.E.; Loreto, C. Apoptosis in temporomandibular joint disc with internal derangement involves mitochondrial-dependent pathways. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol. Scand. 2013, 71, 577–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ouyang, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wang, F.T.; Zhou, T.T.; Liu, B.; Bao, J.K. Programmed cell death pathways in cancer: A review of apoptosis, autophagy and programmed necrosis. Cell Prolif. 2012, 45, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dickens, L.S.; Powley, I.R.; Hughes, M.A.; MacFarlane, M. The ‘complexities’ of life and death: Death receptor signalling platforms. Exp. Cell Res. 2012, 318, 1269–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Boise, L.H.; González-Garcia, M.; Postema, C.E.; Ding, L.; Lindsten, T.; Turka, L.A.; Mao, X.; Nuñez, G.; Thompson, C.B. Bcl-x, a bcl-2-related gene that functions as a dominant regulator of apoptotic cell death. Cell 1993, 74, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Min, F.; Dong, W.X. The mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis. J. Beijing Med. Univ. 2002, 1, 157–183. [Google Scholar]
  31. Li, Y.J.; Zhao, X.; Vecchiarelli-Federico, L.M.; Li, Y.; Datti, A.; Cheng, Y.; Ben-David, Y. Drug-mediated inhibition of fli-1 for the treatment of leukemia. Blood Cancer J. 2012, 2, e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample Availability: All the samples of the compounds are available from the authors.
Molecules 22 01923 g001 550
Figure 1. The structure of fangchinoline and tetrandrine.
Figure 1. The structure of fangchinoline and tetrandrine.
Molecules 22 01923 g001
Molecules 22 01923 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of fangchinoline derivatives 1–4. (i) sodium hydride, halide, r.t.; (ii) HNO3, H2SO4, −10–0 °C; (iii) acyl halide, DMAP, r.t.; (iv) NBS or NCS, TFA, 0 °C–r.t.
Scheme 1. Synthetic route of fangchinoline derivatives 1–4. (i) sodium hydride, halide, r.t.; (ii) HNO3, H2SO4, −10–0 °C; (iii) acyl halide, DMAP, r.t.; (iv) NBS or NCS, TFA, 0 °C–r.t.
Molecules 22 01923 sch001
Molecules 22 01923 g002 550
Figure 2. Compound 4g induced apoptosis in WM9 cells. WM9 cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI by incubating at room temperature for 15 min after treated cells with 2.5 µM 4g for 24 h. Finally, apoptosis analysis was carried out by flow cytometry.
Figure 2. Compound 4g induced apoptosis in WM9 cells. WM9 cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC and PI by incubating at room temperature for 15 min after treated cells with 2.5 µM 4g for 24 h. Finally, apoptosis analysis was carried out by flow cytometry.
Molecules 22 01923 g002
Molecules 22 01923 g003 550
Figure 3. Fangchinoline derivative 4g affects the protein levels of the apoptotic genes in WM9 cell line. Western blots using the indicated antibodies revealed that 4g treatment activated the apoptosis pathway in WM9 cell line. WM9 cells were treated with 2.5 μM 4g for 24 h.
Figure 3. Fangchinoline derivative 4g affects the protein levels of the apoptotic genes in WM9 cell line. Western blots using the indicated antibodies revealed that 4g treatment activated the apoptosis pathway in WM9 cell line. WM9 cells were treated with 2.5 μM 4g for 24 h.
Molecules 22 01923 g003
Table
Table 1. The IC50 values of fangchinoline derivatives 1–4 against the growth of 5 cancer cell lines.
Table 1. The IC50 values of fangchinoline derivatives 1–4 against the growth of 5 cancer cell lines.
CompoundIC50 (µM)
HELPC3WM9K562MDA-MB-231
1a4.423.653.444.755.13
1b4.017.225.566.604.44
1c4.724.753.056.785.04
2a8.963.693.048.338.60
3a2.753.012.656.996.67
3b2.953.593.953.854.61
3c6.824.763.584.068.70
3d2.044.393.053.351.99
3e2.984.192.214.295.53
3f3.294.292.614.324.08
3g4.044.333.136.396.02
3h1.862.514.573.622.79
3i2.044.572.732.863.46
4a2.654.222.512.454.12
4b5.113.853.543.167.22
4c3.522.582.483.833.96
4d3.452.403.453.533.96
4e4.083.833.605.274.16
4f4.173.132.123.693.93
4g1.982.031.072.092.92
Fangchinoline8.9511.0613.1310.2912.29
Vincristine6.385.3610.595.6213.14
From MTT assay after 48 h of treatment; the values are averaged from at least 3 independent experiments; variation ±10%.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, Y.; Xia, B.; Lan, J.; Hu, S.; Huang, L.; Chen, C.; Zeng, X.; Lou, H.; Lin, C.; Pan, W. Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Fangchinoline Derivatives. Molecules 2017, 22, 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111923

AMA Style

Liu Y, Xia B, Lan J, Hu S, Huang L, Chen C, Zeng X, Lou H, Lin C, Pan W. Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Fangchinoline Derivatives. Molecules. 2017; 22(11):1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111923

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Yazhou, Bin Xia, Junjie Lan, Shengcao Hu, Lan Huang, Chao Chen, Xueyi Zeng, Huayong Lou, Changhu Lin, and Weidong Pan. 2017. "Design, Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Fangchinoline Derivatives" Molecules 22, no. 11: 1923. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22111923

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop