Next Article in Journal
New Flurbiprofen Derivatives: Synthesis, Membrane Affinity and Evaluation of in Vitro Effect on β-Amyloid Levels
Previous Article in Journal
Hepatoprotective Effects of Ixora parviflora Extract against Exhaustive Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress in Mice
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Repellent and Insecticidal Constituents of the Essential Oil of Artemisia rupestris L. Aerial Parts against Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel

1
Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
2
Analytical and Testing Center, Beijing Normal University, Haidian District, Beijing 100875, China
3
Department of Plant Pathology, China Agricultural University, Haidian District, Beijing 100193, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2013, 18(9), 10733-10746; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180910733
Submission received: 22 July 2013 / Revised: 29 August 2013 / Accepted: 30 August 2013 / Published: 3 September 2013

Abstract

:
The aim of this research was to determine the chemical composition and insecticidal and repellent activity of the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris L. aerial parts against the booklice Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel and isolation of insecticidal and repellent constituents from the essential oil. The essential oil of A. rupestris was obtained by hydrodistillation and analyzed by GC-MS. A total of 30 components of the essential oil of A. rupestris was identified and the principal compounds in the essential oil were α-terpinyl acetate (37.18%), spathulenol (10.65%), α-terpineol (10.09%), and linalool (7.56%), followed by 4-terpineol (3.92%) and patchoulol (3.05%). Based on bioactivity-guided fractionation, the four active constituents were isolated from the essential oil and identified as α-terpineol, α-terpinyl acetate, 4-terpineol and linalool. The essential oil of A. rupestris exhibited contact toxicity against L. bostrychophila with LD50 value of 414.48 µg/cm2. α-Terpinyl acetate (LD50 = 92.59 µg/cm2) exhibited stronger contact toxicity against booklice than α-terpineol (LD50 = 140.30 µg/cm2), 4-terpineol (LD50 = 211.35 µg/cm2), and linalool (LD50 = 393.16 µg/cm2). The essential oil of A. rupestris (LC50 = 6.67 mg/L air) also possessed fumigant toxicity against L. bostrychophila while the four constituents, 4-terpineol, α-terpineol, α-terpinyl acetate and linalool had LC50 values of 0.34, 1.12, 1.26 and 1.96 mg/L air, respectively. α-Terpinol and α-terpinyl acetate showed strong repellency against L. bostrychophila, while linalool and 4-terpinol exhibited weak repellency. The results indicate that the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and its constituent compounds have potential for development into natural insecticides or fumigants as well as repellents for control of insects in stored grains.

1. Introduction

Booklice (Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel; Psocoptera: Liposcelididae) have a worldwide distribution infesting domestic premises, raw material stores, manufacturing factories, and historical documents in museums [1]. Booklice do not bite, or transmit disease and are considered as nuisance pests rather than a cause of losses of stored commodities [2]. Booklice were generally regarded as secondary pests, often overlooked due to their small size and the existence of other more damaging post-harvest primary pests [e.g., maize weevils (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky), rice weevils (S. oryzae L.) and lesser grain borer (Rhyzopertha dominica Fabricius)] in cereal grains. However, new evidence indicates that psocids are perhaps the most important emerging pests in stored grains and related commodities due to their small size, and resistance to chemicals [1]. Currently, recommended pest control measures in durable stored food products rely heavily on use of synthetic insecticides/fumigants which pose possible health hazards to warm-blooded animals, risk of environmental pollution, development of resistance by insects and pest resurgence [3] These problems have necessitated a search for alternative eco-friendly insect pest control methods. In recent years, global research has focused on the possible use of essential oils, in protection of stored agricultural products [4,5]. Investigations in several countries confirm that some plant essential oils not only repel insects, but possess contact and fumigant toxicity against stored product pests as well as exhibiting feeding inhibition or harmful effects on the reproductive system of insects [4,5,6].
During the screening program for new agrochemicals from Chinese medicinal herbs and wild plants, the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris L. aerial parts was found to possess insecticidal toxicity against booklice (L. bostrychophila). The genus Artemisia belongs to the family Compositae (Asteraceae) and is a large, diverse genus of plants with about 380 species around the World, of which 186 species (82 endemic) are distributed in China [7]. Many Artemisia species are rich in polyacetylenes, flavonoids, terpenoids, and cyanogenic glycosides and are well-known medicinal plants. Rock wormwood (A. rupestris) is a perennial subshrub distributed in dry hills, desert or semi-desert steppes as well as dry river valleys (1,100–2,900 m) in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China and also distributed in Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Russia, Tajikistan; East and North of Europe [7]. A. rupestris is a well-known traditional Chinese medicinal plant in the Xinjiang of China used for detoxification, with antitumor, antibacterial, and antivirus properties, and is used as well for protecting the liver [8]. Several alkaloids, sesquiterpenoids, sesquiterpene lactone glycosides, triterpenoids, and flavonoids have been identified from A. rupestris [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. The chemical composition of the essential oil derived from A. rupestris aerial parts has been determined previously [18,19,20]. Essential oils of several Chinese Artemisia species were demonstrated to possess insecticidal activity to grain storage insects [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. However, a literature survey shows that there is no report on insecticidal activity of the essential oil derived from A. rupestris aerial parts. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the chemical constituents and insecticidal activity of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts against the booklice and isolation of active constituent compounds from the essential oil.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Essential Oil Chemical Composition

The yellow essential oil yield of A. rupestris aerial parts was 0.21% (V/W) and the density of the concentrated essential oil was determined as 0.88 g/mL. A total of 30 components of the essential oil of A. rupestris were identified, accounting for 98.01% of the total oil (Table 1). The principal compounds in the essential oil were α-terpinyl acetate (37.18%), spathulenol (10.65%), α-terpineol (10.09%), and linalool (7.56%) followed by 4-terpineol (3.92%) and patchoulol (3.05%). Monoterpenoids represented 19 of the 30 compounds, corresponding to 72.97% of the whole oil, while nine of the 30 constituents (23.86% of the crude essential oil) were sesquiterpenoids. The chemical composition of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts in the present study was different from that reported in previous studies. For example, α-terpinyl acetate (18.68%), β-myrcene (15.95%), terpinolene (8.59%), β-terpineol (5.77%) and alloocimene (4.43%) were the previously reported major compounds in the essential oil of A. rupestris [18], however, the two main constituents of the essential oil derived from A. rupestris were dihydrocarvyl acetate (31.54%) and 2-hydroxy-3-(1-propenyl group)-1,4-napthoquinone (27.28%) [20]. The essential oil from European A. rupestris contained hexadecanol (18.1%), hexadecanoic acid (11.2%), guaiol (6.2%) and β-elemene (3.9%) [19]. In the previous reports, influence of environmental factors on p-cymene, γ-terpinene, linalool and thymol levels in the essential oil of Thymus migricus was evident [29] and monoterpenes and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons in the essential oils of Lychnophora ericoides were strongly related to chemical balance in soils (organic matter, P and base saturation) [30]. The above findings demonstrated that there are broad differences in the chemical components for A. rupestris. Thus, further studies on plant cultivation and essential oil standardization are necessary because chemical composition of the essential oil of A. rupestris varies greatly with the plant population as well as harvest time.
Table 1. Chemical constituents of the essential oil derived from Artemisia rupestris aerial parts.
Table 1. Chemical constituents of the essential oil derived from Artemisia rupestris aerial parts.
Peak No.RI *CompoundComposition, %
1967Sabinene0.06
2981β-Pinene0.19
3992Myrcene1.47
41018(+)-4-Carene0.19
51023 β-Cymene0.11
61030D-Limonene0.28
710321,8-Cineol0.39
81067cis-Linalool oxide0.19
91094Linalool7.56
1011754-Terpineol3.92
111188α-Terpineol10.09
121204Verbenone0.61
131227Citronellol2.23
141255Geraniol2.01
151285Bornyl acetate0.62
161340Linalyl propionate2.62
171349α-Cubebene0.69
181351α-Terpinyl acetate37.18
191355 Citronellol acetate2.14
201356Eugenol1.18
211391β-Elemene0.85
221420β-Caryophyllene1.80
231453Geranyl acetone1.11
241457( Z)-β-Farnesene0.61
251494α-Selinene1.07
261523δ-Cadinene1.36
271578Spathulenol10.65
281583 Caryophyllene oxide2.09
291663Patchoulol3.05
301672Valeranone1.59
Total identified98.01
Monoterpenoids72.97
Sesquiterpenoids23.86
Others1.18
* RI, retention index as determined on a HP-5MS column using the homologous series of n-hydrocarbons.

2.2. Insecticidial Activities

The essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts exhibited contact toxicity against L. bostrychophila with LD50 value of 418.48 µg/cm2 (Table 2). When compared with the positive control pyrethrum extract (LD50 = 18.99 µg/cm2), the essential oil demonstrated 22 times less toxicity to L. bostrychophila. Four constituent compounds, α-terpinyl acetate, α-terpineol, 4-terpineol acetate and linalool exhibited contact toxicity against the booklice, with LD50 values of 92.59, 140.30, 211.35 and 393.16 µg/cm2, respectively (Table 2). α-Terpinyl acetate had almost 4.5 times more toxicity than the crude essential oil against the booklice. Moreover, α-terpinyl acetate and α-terpineol possessed almost four and three times more toxicity than linalool against booklice, respectively. It is suggested that α-terpinyl acetate and α-terpineol are major contributors to the insecticidal (contact) activity of the essential oil. However, compared with pyrethrum extract (positive control), α-terpinyl acetate showed only five times less toxicity against booklice.
Table 2. Contact toxicity and fumigant toxicity of the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris aerial parts and its constituents against Liposcelis bostrychophila.
Table 2. Contact toxicity and fumigant toxicity of the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris aerial parts and its constituents against Liposcelis bostrychophila.
ToxicityTreatmentLD50
LC50
95% FL *Slope ± SEChi square
2 )
Contact Toxicity
(μg/cm2)
A. rupestris418.48389.34–447.098.57 ± 0.8317.92
Linalool393.16368.45–429.539.86 ± 0.91 13.76
α-Terpineol140.30129.67–151.295.08 ± 0.4818.48
α-Terpinyl acetate92.5985.12–100.457.29 ± 0.7412.88
4-Terpineol211.35196.27–230.658.74 ± 0.8315.47
Pyrethrum extract 18.9917.56–20.067.64 ± 1.05-
Fumigant
(mg/L air)
A. rupestris6.676.21–6.987.03 ± 0.6316.24
Linalool1.961.85–2.125.78 ± 0.5612.33
α-Terpineol1.121.01–1.214.11 ± 0.3414.56
α-Terpinyl acetate1.261.14–1.335.49 ± 0.5110.16
4-Terpineol0.340.31–0.384.13 ± 0.33 12.19
Dichlorvos1.35 × 10−31.25–1.47 × 10−36.87 ± 0.77-
* Fiducial limits.
4-Terpineol (LC50 = 0.34 mg/L air) exhibited stronger fumigant toxicity against L. bostrychophila adults than α-terpineol (LC50 = 1.12 mg/L air), α-terpinyl acetate (LC50 = 1.26 mg/L air) and linalool (LC50 = 1.96 mg/L air), while the crude essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts showed an LC50 value of 6.67 mg/L air (Table 2). 4-Terpineol showed almost 20 times stronger fumigant toxicity than the essential oil against the booklice. However, compared with the positive control, dichlorvos (LC50 = 1.35 × 10−3 mg/L air), α-terpineol and the crude essential oil exhibited almost 250 times and 4,940 times less toxicity to L. bostrychophila, respectively. Moreover, in the previous studies, the two active constituent compounds, 4-terpineol and α-terpineol have been found to possess strong fumigant toxicity against several grain storage insects, such as S. granaries L., S. oryzae, S. zeamais, Tribolium castaneum Herbst, T. confusum L., and R. dominica [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. α-Terpinyl acetate was regarded as active termiticidal compounds of hinoki wood (Chamaecyparis obtusa) [39]. However, there is no report on fumigant and contact toxicity of α-terpinyl acetate against grain storage insects after literature survey. Another constituent compound, linalool was also shown to exhibit fumigant toxicity against several insects. e.g., S. zeamais [40], the triatomine bug (Rhodnius prolixus) [41] and houseflies with a 24 h LC50 value of 13.6 mg/L air [42]. Moreover, linalool possessed both contact and fumigant toxicity against human head louse (Pediculus humanus capitis) [43] and exhibited a high acaricidal activity by vapor action against mobile stages of Tyrophagus putrescentiae [44]. 4-Terpineol, α-terpineol and linalool were found to be a competitive inhibitor of acetyl-cholinesterase (AchE) [45]. The above findings suggest that insecticidal activity especially fumigant activity of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and its four constituent compounds against the booklice is quite promising. As currently used fumigants are synthetic insecticides and the most effective fumigants (e.g., phosphine and methyl bromide) are also highly toxic to humans and other non-target organisms, the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and its four constituent compounds show potential to be developed as possible natural fumigants/insecticides for the control of L. bostrychophila.
In traditional Chinese medicine, A. rupestris aerial parts are used for detoxification and for protecting the liver [8]. Moreover, many pharmacological activities of A. rupestris were demonstrated such as anti-tumor, antioxidant, antibacterial, and antivirus properties [8]. It thus seems that this medicinal herb is quite safe for human consumption because it has been used as a medicinal herb for hundreds of years. However, no experimental data about the safety of this herb is available so far, so to develop a practical application for the essential oil and the isolated constituents as novel fumigants/insecticides, further research on the safety of the essential oil/compounds to humans is needed. Additional studies on the development of formulations are also necessary to improve the efficacy and stability and to reduce cost.

2.3. Repellency

The results of repellency assays for the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and isolated constituents against L. bostrychophila are presented in Table 3. Data showed that at tested concentrations, α-terpinol and terpinyl acetate showed strong repellency against L. bostrychophila. At the lowest assayed concentration (3.2 nL/cm2), the two compounds still showed moderate (Class III) repellency (52% and 48%, respectively) against the booklice at 4 h after exposure (Table 3). Linalool and 4-terpinol also exhibited weak repellency against L. bostrychophila. At the highest concentration (13 nL/cm2), the compounds exhibited only 53% and 46% (Class III) repellency against L. bostrychophila at 4 h after exposure, respectively (Table 3). Compared with the positive control,
Table 3. Percentage repellency (PR) after two exposure times for the essential oil and isolated constituents against Liposcelis bostrychophila *.
Table 3. Percentage repellency (PR) after two exposure times for the essential oil and isolated constituents against Liposcelis bostrychophila *.
Treatment2 h4 h
13 nL/cm26.4 nL/cm23.2 nL/cm213 nL/cm26.4 nL/cm23.2 nL/cm2
DEET100 ± 0a84 ± 7a72 ± 9a 94 ± 2a82 ± 6a64 ± 5a
Oil 76 ± 8c56 ± 4b41 ± 6b73 ± 6c 42 ± 9c29 ± 7cd
Linalool72 ± 5cd42 ± 9c27 ± 6c53 ± 9d31 ± 6d23 ± 9d
α-Terpinol85 ± 4bc75 ± 4a69 ± 9a84 ± 6b65 ± 7b52 ± 7ba
4-Terpinol64 ± 8d55 ± 5b40 ± 5b46 ± 7d47 ± 7c32 ± 9c
Terpinyl acetate91 ± 7ab76 ± 7a62 ± 7a86 ± 4b67 ± 9b48 ± 9b
* means in the same column followed by the same letters do not differ significantly (P > 0.05) in ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. PR was subjected to an arcsine square-root transformation before ANOVA and Tukey’s tests.
DEET and terpinyl acetate exhibited the same level of repellency against L. bostrychophila at 2 h after exposure and at 4 h after exposure, DEET and α-terpinol had the same level of repellency (Table 3). However, the two other constituents, linalool and 4-terpinol showed less repellency against the booklice. Many essential oils and their constituents had been evaluated for repellency against insects [46]. However, only few reports on the booklouse [47,48,49]. In this paper, we report to isolate four insecticidal and repellent constituents from the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial part against the booklice for the first time. These findings suggest that the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and the four isolated compounds show potential for development as natural repellents or insecticides for stored product insects.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

1H and 13C-NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker ACF300 [300 MHz (1H)] and AMX500 [500 MHz (1H)] instruments using CDCl3 as the solvent with TMS as internal standard. EIMS were determined on a ThermoQuest Trace 2000 mass spectrometer at 70 eV (probe). Components of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts were separated and identified by gas chromatography-flame ionization detection (GC-FID) and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) on an Agilent 6890N gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector connected to an Agilent 5973N mass selective detector. The same capillary column (HP-5MS 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) and analysis conditions were used for both GC-FID and GC-MS.

3.2. Plant Material and Essential Oil Extraction

The dried aerial parts of A. rupestris (5 kg) were purchased from Anguo Chinese Medicinal Herbs Market (Anguo 071200, Hebei, China). The plant was identified by Dr. Liu, QR (College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China) and a voucher specimen (CMH-Xinjiangyizhihao-Xinjiang-2013-04) was deposited in the museum of Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University. The sample was ground to a powder using a grinding mill (Retsch Muhle, Haan, Germany). The powder was subjected to hydrodistillation using a modified Clevenger-type apparatus for 6 h and extracted with n-hexane. Anhydrous sodium sulphate was used to remove water after extraction. The essential oil was stored in airtight containers in a refrigerator at 4 °C for subsequent experiments.

3.3. Insects

Booklice, L. bostrychophila were obtained from laboratory cultures in the dark in incubators at 28–30 °C and 70%–80% relative humidity and was reared on a 1:1:1 mixture, by mass, of milk powder, active yeast, and flour. All the containers housing insects and the Petri dishes used in experiments were made escape proof with a coating of polytetrafluoroethylene (Fluon®, Blades Biological, Edenbridge, UK). Laboratory bioassays were done within one week after adult collections.

3.4. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

The GC settings were as follows: the initial oven temperature was held at 60 °C for 1 min and ramped at 10 °C min−1 to 180 °C where it was held for 1 min, and then ramped at 20 °C min−1 to 280 °C and held there for 15 min. The injector temperature was maintained at 270°C. The samples (1 μL, diluted to 1:100 in acetone) were injected, with a split ratio of 1:10. The carrier gas was helium at flow rate of 1.0 mL·min−1. Spectra were scanned from 20 to 550 m/z at 2 scans s−1. Most constituents were identified by gas chromatography by comparison of their retention indices with those of the literature or with those of authentic compounds available in our laboratories. The retention indices were determined in relation to a homologous series of n-alkanes (C8–C24) under the same operating conditions. Further identification was made by comparison of their mass spectra with those stored in NIST 05 (Standard Reference Data, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and Wiley 275 libraries (Wiley, New York, NY, USA) or with mass spectra from the literature [50]. Component relative percentages were calculated based on GC peak areas without using correction factors.

3.5. Bioassay-Directed Fractionation

The crude essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts (20 mL) was chromatographed on a silica gel (Merck 9385, 1,000 g) column (85 mm i.d., 850 mm length) by gradient elution with a mixture of solvents (n-hexane, n-hexane-ethyl acetate). Fractions (500 mL) were collected and concentrated at 40 °C, and similar fractions according to thin layer chromatography (TLC) profiles were combined to yield 15 fractions. Fractions (3–5, 7–9) that possessed contact toxicity, with similar TLC profiles, were pooled and further purified by preparative silica gel column chromatography (PTLC) until obtain the pure compound for determining structure as linalool (1, 0.6 g), 4-terpineol (2, 0.3 g), α-terpineol (3, 0.8 g), and α-terpinyl acetate (4, 1.2 g). The structure of the compounds was elucidated based on high-resolution electron impact mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance.

3.6. Isolated Constituent Compounds

Linalool (1, Figure 1). Colorless oil, 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (ppm): 5.92 (1H, dd, J = 10.0, 10.0 Hz, H-2), 5.22 (1H, d, J = 20.0 Hz, H-1, trans), 5.12 (1H, t, H-6), 5.06 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-1, cis), 2.03 (2H, m, 5-CH2), 1.83 (1H, br, 3-OH, which was removed in the deuterium exchange spectrum after adding a drop of deuterated water), 1.68 (3H, s, 9-CH3), 1.60 (3H, s, 8-CH3), 1.53 (2H, m, 4-CH2), 1.27 (3H, s, 10-CH3). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (ppm): 145.05 (C-2), 131.87 (C-7), 124.44 (C-6), 111.65 (C-1), 73.43 (C-3), 41.57 (C-4), 27.83 (C-10), 25.67 (C-8), 22.71 (C-5), 17.66 (C-9). EI-MS m/z (%): 154 (M+, 5), 136 (15), 121 (25), 109 (11), 93 (80), 83 (18), 80 (30), 71 (100), 69 (50), 55 (45), 43 (39), 41(62), 27 (15). The data matched with previous reports [40,51].
4-Terpineol (2, Figure 1). Colorless oil, 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (ppm): 5.31 (1H, dd, J = 5.0 Hz, 2.5 Hz, H-2), 2.18 (2H, dd, J = 15.0 Hz, 5.0 Hz, H-3), 1.94 (2H, dd, J = 15.0 Hz, 5.0 Hz, H-6), 1.72 (3H, m, H-7), 1.66 (1H, m, H-8), 1.58 (2H, m, H-5), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-9), 0.94 (3H, d, J = 5.0 Hz, H-10). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (ppm): 133.86 (C-1), 118.45 (C-2), 71.74 (C-4), 36.78 (C-8), 34.61 (C-5), 30.80 (C-3), 27.06 (C-6), 23.28 (C-7), 6.85 (C-9); 6.82 (C-10). EI-MS m/z (%): 154 (M+, 15), 111 (50), 93 (44), 86 (23), 71 (100), 69 (21), 68 (15), 55 (17), 43 (29), 41(23). The data matched with previous reports [40,51].
α-Terpineol (3, Figure 1). Colorless oil, 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (ppm): 5.38–5.44 (1H, m, H-2), 2.11 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-3), 2.01 (1H, d, J = 5.0 Hz, H-6), 1.89–1.93 (2H, m, H-5), 1.78-1.88 (2H, m, H-3), 1.67 (3H, s, H -7); 1.47–1.57 (3H, m, H-4), 1.22 (3H, s, H-10), 1.20 (3H, s, H-9). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (ppm): 118.45 (C-2), 134.02 (C-1), 45.01 (C-4), 23.98 (C-5), 31.02 (C-6), 23.34 (C-7), 27.46 (C-10), 72.74 (C-8), 26.89 (C-3), 26.29 (C-9). EI-MS m/z (%):136 (48), 121 (58), 107 (11), 95 (22), 93 (67), 81 (36), 79 (18), 68(27), 59 (100), 55 (16), 43 (32), 41 (20). The data matched with previous reports [40,51].
α-Terpinyl acetate (4, Figure 1). Colorless oil, 1H-NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (ppm): 5.40 (1H, brs, H-2), 2.06 (1H, s, H-4), 1.99-2.03 (2H, m, H-6), 2.00 (1H, m, H-3b), 1.98 (3H, s, H-12), 1.86 (1H, m, H-3a), 1.81 (1H, m, H-5b), 1.67 (3H, s, H-7), 1.46 (3H, s, H-10), 1.43 (3H, s, H-9), 1.31 (1H, m, H-5a). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ (ppm): 170.78 (C-11), 133.98 (C-1), 120.32 (C-2), 84.86 (C-8), 42.57 (C-4), 30.89 (C-6), 26.38 (C-3), 23.86 (C-5), 23.31 (C-10), 3.35 (C-9), 23.13 (C-12), 22.50 (C-7). EI-MS m/z (%): 196 [M+, 5], 136 (58), 121 (100), 105 (22), 93 (86), 91 (46), 77 (26), 67 (37), 51 (21). The data matched with previous reports [51,52].
Figure 1. Constituent compounds isolated from the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris aerial parts.
Figure 1. Constituent compounds isolated from the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris aerial parts.
Molecules 18 10733 g001

3.7. Contact Toxicity with Treated Filter Paper

Contact toxicity of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts against L. bostrychophila was measured as described by Liu et al. [1]. Range-finding studies were run to determine the appropriate testing concentrations of the essential oil of A. rupestris and pure compounds. The essential oil and compound were diluted in acetone. The filter paper with 3.5 cm in diameter (Whatman) was treated with 150 μL of the solution. Then the filter paper after treated with solid glue (Glue Stick, Jong Ie Nara Co., Ltd. Hong Kong) was placed in a Petri dish (3.5 cm in diameter) and 10 booklice were put on the filter paper by using a hair brush. The plastic cover with holes was put and all the Petri dishes were kept in incubators at 27–29 °C, 70%–80% r.h. for 24 h. Acetone was used as negative control and pyrethrum extract was used as a positive control. Six concentrations (1.0%, 1.2%, 1.5%, 1.8%, 2.2%, and 4.5%) and five replicates of each concentration were used in all treatments and controls. Mortality of insects was observed and the observed data were corrected for control mortality using Abbott’s formula. The results from all replicates were subjected to probit analysis using the PriProbit Program V1.6.3 to determine LD50 values [53]. Pyrethrum extract (25% pyrethrine I and pyrethrine II) was purchased from Fluka Chemie (Buchs, Switzerland).

3.8. Fumigant Toxicity

Fumigant toxicity of the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts against L. bostrychophila was determined as described by Zhao [54]. Range-finding studies were run to determine the appropriate testing concentrations of the pure compounds and C. wenyujin essential oil. A filter paper strip (3.5 cm × 1.5 cm) treated with 10 μL of an appropriate concentration of test essential oil/compound in acetone. The impregnated filter paper was then placed in the bottom cover of glass bottle of 250 mL. The insects, 10 adults in a small glass bottle (8 mL), were exposed for 24 h. Each concentration had five replicates. Six concentrations (0.80%, 1.0%, 1.8%, 2.7%, 4.0%, 6.0%) were used in all treatments and controls. All the treatments were replicated five times. Acetone was used as negative control and dichlorvos was used as a positive control. The observed mortality data were corrected for control mortality using Abbott’s formula. The LC50 values were calculated by using Probit analysis [53]. Positive control, dichlorvos (99.9%) was purchased from Aladdin Reagent Company (Shanghai, China).

3.9. Repellency

The repellency of A. rupestris essential oil against L. bostrychophila was determined as described by Zhang [48]. Petri dishes (6 cm in diameter) were used to confine L. bostrychophila during the experiment. The crude essential oil and the isolated compounds were diluted in acetone to three concentrations (13.0, 6.4, 3.2 nL/cm2). Filter paper (6 cm in diameter) was cut in half and 150 μL of each concentration was applied separately to half of the filter paper as uniformly as possible with a micropipette. The other half (control) was treated with 150 μL of absolute acetone. Both the treated half and the control half were then air dried to evaporate the solvent completely (10 s). A full disc was carefully remade by attaching the tested half to the negative control half with tape. Care was taken so that the attachment did not prevent free movement of insects from the one half to another, but the distance between the filter-paper halves remained sufficient to prevent seepage of test samples from one half to another. Each remade filter paper after treated with solid glue (Glue Stick, Jong Ie Nara Co., Ltd., location) was placed in a Petri dish with the seam oriented in one of four randomly selected different directions to avoid any insecticidal stimuli affecting the distribution of insects. Twenty insects were released in the center of each filter-paper disc and a cover was placed over the petri dish. Five replicates were used and the experiment was repeated for three times. Counts of the insects present on each strip were made after 2 h and 4 h. The percent repellency of each volatile oil/compound was then calculated using the formula:
PR (%) = [(Nc ‒ Nt)/(Nc + Nt)] × 100
where Nc was the number of insects present in the negative control half, Nt was the number of insects present in the treated half. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s test were conducted by using SPSS 10 for Windows 98. Percentage was subjected to arcsine square-root transformation before ANOVA and Tukey’s tests. The averages were then assigned to different classes (0 to V) (Table 4) [55]. A commercial repellent, DEET (N, N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide), was purchased from the National Center of Pesticide Standards (Shenyang, China) and used as a positive control.
Table 4. The scale to be assign repellency of the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris and its constituents.
Table 4. The scale to be assign repellency of the essential oil of Artemisia rupestris and its constituents.
ClassPercent repellencyClassPercent repellencyClassPercent repellency
0>0.01 to <0.1II20.1–40IV60.1–80
I0.1–20III40.1–60V80.1–100

4. Conclusions

The study indicates that the essential oil of A. rupestris aerial parts and its four constituent compounds have potential for development into natural insecticides/fumigants and repellents for control of insects in stored grains.

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the Hi-Tech Research and Development of China 2011AA10A202. We thank Liu Q.R. from the College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, for the identification of the investigated medicinal herbs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, Z.L.; Zhao, N.N.; Liu, C.M.; Zhou, L.; Du, S.S. Identification of insecticidal constituents of the essential oil of Curcuma wenyujin rhizomes against Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel. Molecules 2012, 17, 12049–12060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Turner, B.D. Psocids as a nuisance problem in the UK. Pestic. Outlook 1998, 9, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zettler, J.L.; Arthur, F.H. Chemical control of stored product insects with fumigants and residual treatments. Crop. Prot. 2000, 19, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Isman, M.B. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajendran, S.; Srianjini, V. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insects control. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2008, 44, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Regnault-Roger, C.; Vincent, C.; Arnason, J.T. Essential oils in insect control: Low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2012, 57, 405–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nayak, M.K.; Daglish, G.J.; Byrne, V.S. Effectiveness of spinosad as a grain protectant against resistant beetle and psocid pests of stored grain in Australia. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2005, 41, 455–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, Y.M. Pharmacography of Uighur (Part I); Xinjiang People’s Publishing House: Urumqi, China, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  9. He, F.; Aisa, H.A.; Shakhidoyatov, K.M. Flavones from Artemisia rupestrisa. Chem. Nat. Compds. 2012, 48, 685–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, F.; Nugroho, A.E.; Wong, C.P.; Hirasawa, Y.; Shirota, O.; Morita, H.; Aisa, H.A. Rupestines F-M, new guaipyridine sesquiterpene alkaloids from Artemisia rupestris. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2012, 60, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gu, D.Y.; Yang, Y.; Abdulla, R.; Aisa, H.A. Characterization and identification of chemical compositions in the extract of Artemisia rupestris L. by liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrometry 2012, 26, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  12. Su, Z.; Wu, H.K.; He, F.; Slukhan, U.; Aisa, H.A. New guaipyridine sesquiterpene alkaloids from Artemisia rupestris L. Helvetica Chimica. Acta 2010, 93, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, J.B.; Ji, T.F.; Song, W.X.; Wang, A.G.; Su, Y.L. Chemical constituents from herb of Artemisia rupestris. Zhongcaoyao 2008, 39, 1125–1127. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao, Y.; Su, Z.; Aisa, H.A. 2-Phenoxychromone flavonoid glycoside from Artemisia rupestris. Chem. Nat. Compds. 2009, 45, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aisa, H.A.; Zhao, Y.; He, C.X. A 2-phenoxychromone from Artemisia rupestris. Chem. Nat. Compds. 2006, 42, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, G.S.; Zhao, W.; Wu, D.; Yu, D.Q.; He, C.H.; Yang, J.J.; Sun, F. The structure and absolute configuration of isorupestonic acid from Artemisia rupestris L. Yaoxue Xuebao 1991, 26, 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xu, G.S.; Chen, X.Y.; Yu, D.Q. Rupestonic acid, a new sesquiterpene from Artemisia rupestris L. Yaoxue Xuebao 1988, 23, 122–125. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, G.S. Chemical constituents of the volatile oil of Artemisia rupestris L. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 7, 209–212. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bicchi, C.; Frattini, C.; Sacco, T. Essential oils of three Asiatic Artemisia species. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 2440–2442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yao, X.Y.; Chao, Q.F.; Chen, Z.D.; Yang, B.Y. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of the volatile oil from Artemisia rupestris L. Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 37, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, J.; Zhu, F.; Zhou, X.M.; Niu, C.Y.; Lei, C.L. Repellent and fumigant activity of essential oil from Artemisia vulgaris to Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Stored Prod. Res. 2006, 42, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yuan, H.B.; Shang, L.N.; Wei, C.Y.; Ren, B.Z. Comparison of constituents and insecticidal activities of essential oil from Artemisia lavandulaefolia by steam distillation and supercritical-CO2 fluid extraction. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2010, 26, 888–892. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chu, S.S.; Liu, Q.R.; Liu, Z.L. Insecticidal activity and chemical composition of the essential oil of Artemisia vestita from China. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2010, 38, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Z.L.; Liu, Q.R.; Chu, S.S.; Jiang, G.H. Insecticidal activity and chemical composition of the essential oils of Artemisia lavandulaefolia and Artemisia sieversiana from China. Chem. Biodiv. 2010, 7, 2040–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Z.L.; Chu, S.S.; Liu, Q.R. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity against Sitophilus.Sitophilus zeamais of the essential oils of Artemisia capillaris and Artemisia mongolica. Molecules 2010, 15, 2600–2608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chu, S.S.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity against Sitophilus zeamais of the essential oils derived from Artemisia giraldii and Artemisia subdigitata. Molecules 2012, 17, 7255–7265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chu, S.S.; Du, S.S.; Liu, Q.Z.; Liu, Q.R.; Liu, Z.L. Composition and insecticidal activity of the essential oil of Artemisia igniaria flowering aerial parts against Sitophilus zeamais. J. Med. Plant Res. 2012, 6, 3188–3192. [Google Scholar]
  28. Jiang, G.H.; Liu, Q.R.; Chu, S.S.; Liu, Z.L. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of the essential oil of Artemisia eriopoda against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2012, 7, 267–268. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yavari, A.; Nazeri, V.; Sefidkon, F.; Hassani, M.E. Influence of some environmental factors on the essential oil variability of Thymus migricus. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2010, 5, 943–948. [Google Scholar]
  30. Curado, M.A.; Oliveira, C.B.A.; Jesus, J.G.; Santos, S.C.; Seraphin, J.C.; Ferri, P.H. Environmental factors influence on chemical polymorphism of the essential oils of Lychnophora ericoides. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 2363–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lee, B.H.; Annis, P.C.; Tumaalii, T.; Choi, W.C. Fumigant toxicity of essential oils from the Myrtaceae family and 1, 8-cineole against 3 major stored-grain insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2004, 40, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kordali, S.; Aslan, I.; Calmasur, O.; Cakir, A. Toxicity of essential oils isolated from three Artemisia species and some of their major components to granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ind. Crops. Prod. 2006, 23, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rozman, V.; Kalinovic, I.; Korunic, Z. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2007, 43, 349–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdelgaleil, S.A.M.; Mohamed, M.I.E.; Badawy, M.E.I.; El-Arami, S.A.A. Fumigant and contact toxicities of monoterpenes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity. J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sener, O.; Arslan, M.; Demirel, N.; Uremis, I. Insecticidal effects of some essential oils against the confused flour beetle (Tribolium confusum du Val) (Col.: Tenebrinoidea) in stored wheat. Asian J. Chem. 2009, 21, 3995–4000. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, J.L.; Li, Y.; Lei, C.L. Evaluation of monoterpenes for the control of Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. Nat. Prod. Res. 2009, 23, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Suthisut, D.; Fields, P.G.; Chandrapatya, A. Fumigation toxicity of essential oils from three Thai plants (Zingiberaceae) and their major compounds against Sitophilus zeamais and Tribolium castaneum. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2011, 47, 222–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chu, S.S.; Du, S.S.; Liu, Z.L. Fumigant compounds from the essential oil of Chinese Blumea balsamifera leaves against the maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais). J. Chem. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ohtani, Y.; Hazama, M.; Sameshima, K. Crucial chemical factors of the termiticidal activity of hinoki wood (Chamaecyparis obtusa) III. Contribution of α-terpinyl acetate to the termiticidal activity of hinoki wood. J. Japan Wood Res. Soc. 1997, 43, 1022–1029. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wang, C.F.; Yang, K.; Zhang, H.M.; Cao, J.; Fang, R.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Wang, Y.Y.; Deng, Z.W.; Zhou, L. Components and insecticidal activity against the maize weevils of Zanthoxylum schinifolium fruits and leaves. Molecules 2011, 16, 3077–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sfara, V.; Zerba, E.N.; Alzogaray, R.A. Fumigant insecticidal activity and repellent effect of five essential oils and seven monoterpenes on first-instar nymphs of Rhodnius prolixus. J. Med. Entomol. 2009, 46, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Palacios, S.M.; Bertoni, A.; Rossi, Y.; Santander, R.; Urzua, A. Efficacy of essential oils from edible plants as insecticides against the house fly, Musca domestica L. Molecules 2009, 14, 1938–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, Y.C.; Lee, S.H.; Clark, J.M.; Ahn, Y.J. Ovicidal and adulticidal activities of Origanum majorana essential oil constituents against insecticide-susceptible and pyrethroid/malathion-resistant Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2282–2287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sanchez-Ramos, I.; Castanera, P. Acaricidal activity of natural monoterpenes on Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank), a mite of stored food. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2001, 37, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ryan, F.M.; Byrne, O. Plant-insect coevolution and inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. J. Chem. Ecol. 1988, 14, 1965–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nerio, L.S.; Olivero-Verbel, J.; Stashenko, E. Repellent activity of essential oils: A review. Bioresource Technol. 2010, 101, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, J.J.; Tsai, J.H.; Ding, W.; Zhao, Z.M.; Li, L.S. Toxic effects of six plant oils alone and in combination with controlled atmosphere on Liposcelis bostrychophila (Psocoptera: Liposcelididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2001, 94, 1296–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, J.S.; Zhao, N.N.; Liu, Q.Z.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Zhou, L.; Deng, Z.W. Repellent constituents of essential oil of Cymbopogon distans aerial parts against two stored-product insects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 9910–9915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liang, Y.; Li, J.L.; Xu, S.; Zhao, N.N.; Zhou, L.; Cheng, J.; Liu, Z.L. Repellent constituents of the essential oil of Epimedium pubescens aerial parts against two grain storage insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2013, 106, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Quadrupole Mass Spectroscopy; Allured: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  51. Bohlmann, F.; Zeisberg, R.; Klein, E. Naturally occurring terpene derivatives. 13CNMR spectra of monoterpenes. Org. Magn. Reson. 1975, 7, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liaw, E.T.; Liu, K.J. Synthesis of terpinyl acetate by lipase-catalyzed esterification in supercritical carbon dioxide. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3320–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sakuma, M. Probit analysis of preference data. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 339–347. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, N.N.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W. Evaluation of toxicities of some common spices essential oils from China against Liposcelis bostrychophila. Food Control 2012, 26, 486–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Z.L.; Ho, S.H. Bioactivity of the essential oil extracted from Evodia rutaecarpa Hook f. et Thomas against the grain storage insects, Sitophilus zeamais Motsch and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst). J. Stored Prod. Res. 1999, 35, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the crude extracts and pure compounds are available from the authors.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, X.C.; Li, Y.P.; Li, H.Q.; Deng, Z.W.; Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S. Identification of Repellent and Insecticidal Constituents of the Essential Oil of Artemisia rupestris L. Aerial Parts against Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel. Molecules 2013, 18, 10733-10746. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180910733

AMA Style

Liu XC, Li YP, Li HQ, Deng ZW, Zhou L, Liu ZL, Du SS. Identification of Repellent and Insecticidal Constituents of the Essential Oil of Artemisia rupestris L. Aerial Parts against Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel. Molecules. 2013; 18(9):10733-10746. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180910733

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Xin Chao, Yin Ping Li, He Qin Li, Zhi Wei Deng, Ligang Zhou, Zhi Long Liu, and Shu Shan Du. 2013. "Identification of Repellent and Insecticidal Constituents of the Essential Oil of Artemisia rupestris L. Aerial Parts against Liposcelis bostrychophila Badonnel" Molecules 18, no. 9: 10733-10746. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180910733

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop