molecules Molecules Molecules Molecules 1420-3049 MDPI 10.3390/molecules17044604 molecules-17-04604 Article Extraction and Characterization of Chitin from the Beetle Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky Liu Shaofang Sun Jie Yu Lina Zhang Chushu Bi Jie Zhu Feng Qu Mingjing Jiang Chen Yang Qingli * Shandong Peanut Research Institute, No. 126 Fushan Road, Qingdao 266100, China Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; Email: rice407@163.com; Tel.: +86-532-8761-5601; Fax: +86-532-8761-1087. 17 04 2012 042012 17 4 4604 4611 06 03 2012 31 03 2012 11 04 2012 © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2012

This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Insect chitin was isolated from adult Holotrichia parallela by treatment with 1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH, following by 1% potassium permanganate solution for decolorization. The yield of chitin from this species is 15%. This insect chitin was compared with the commercial α-chitin from shrimp, by infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, and elemental analysis. Both chitins exhibited similar chemical structures and physicochemical properties. Adult H. parallela is thus a promising alternative source of chitin.

 insect chitin Holotrichia parallela characterization extraction 1. Introduction

Chitin, found in arthropods (insects, crustaceans, arachnids and myriapods), is the second most abundant biopolymer after cellulose [1]. Structurally, it is a derivative of cellulose with only an acetamido group replacement at position C-2, i.e., β-(1,4)-2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Chitin is classified into three types according to the different orientations of its microfibrils: α-chitin (anti-parallel chains), β-chitin (parallel chains), and γ-chitin (the combination of parallel and anti-parallel chains) [1,2]. Chitin is insoluble in most solvents because of its compact structure. Therefore, chemical modifications of chitin are performed to obtain more soluble analogs, among which, chitosan, derived by partial N-deacetylation of chitin, is the most common such derivative.

Chitin and chitosan are attracting great interest because of their beneficial biological properties, such as biodegradability, biocompatibility, non-antigenicity and non-toxicity [3,4]. Since they are versatile biopolymers, their potential applications in various industrial fields are being actively investigated. For example, chitin and chitosan have been documented to be useful as antimicrobial, emulsifying, thickening and stabilizing agents in the food industry [5]. They have also shown notable bioactivity in biomedical fields, including wound healing promotion, immune system enhancement, and hemostatic, hypolipidemic and antimicrobial activity [6,7].

Traditionally, chitin is prepared mainly from crab and shrimp shells obtained as byproducts in the seafood industry. Chitin is also a primary component in insect cuticles. Therefore, insects are an alternative source of chitin and, consequently, of chitosan. Recently, the production of chitin and chitosan from insect sources has drawn increased attention. First, insects possess enormous biodiversity and represent 95% of the animal kingdom [8]. Therefore, they offer a tremendous potential as a natural resource for chitin and chitosan production. Furthermore, insect cuticles have lower levels of inorganic material compared to crustacean shells, which makes their demineralization treatment more convenient [9]. Until now, however, only limited numbers of insect species have been documented to be sources of chitin [9,10,11,12,13].

In this study, the isolation and characterization of chitin from adult Holotrichia parallela Motschulsky is described. H. parallela is a beetle species belonging to the Melolonthidae subfamily of the Scarabaeoidea family. These insects are field crop pests in China. In addition, they have also been used as food and traditional medicinal herbs in China and East Asia [14,15,16]. Every year, large amounts of H. parallela adults are captured for the control of this pest in fields. Our institute is investigating the possibility of rearing H. parallela [17]. This will provide a source for studies on the identification of active components from this beetle, including chitin and its derivative chitosan. Here, chitin was purified from H. parallela adults using acid and alkaline treatments, followed by decolorization with potassium permanganate. The physiochemical properties of chitin were characterized by infrared spectroscopy (IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), elemental analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) methods. These physicochemical properties were also compared with those of shrimp chitin.

 2. Results and Discussion 2.1. Chitin Extraction

Chitin is a major component of the insect cuticle, which is always covalently bound to catechol compounds and sclerotin-like proteins [10]. The most common method for chitin extraction from insects involves two steps, an acidic step to remove catechols and a basic step to remove the cuticle proteins, as had been mentioned elsewhere for insect chitin isolation [9,10]. Generally, the acidic treatment conditions used for extraction from insects are moderate in comparison to crustacean exoskeletons. The reason for this is that insects have low levels of inorganic material (less than 10%) as compared to crustacean shells (20–40%) [18,19].

The ash content of chitin is indicative of the effectiveness of the method used for removal of inorganic materials. From Table 1, the adult H. parallela contained 5.5% ash on a dried basis, while the ash content of chitin extracted from this species dropped to 2.2%. This result suggested that the demineralization with 1 M HCl for 30 min was an effective method for decreasing the ash content in adult H. parallela. The nitrogen content of chitin from adult H. parallela decreased to 6.3%, which is lower than the theoretical value of 6.9% for pure chitin. This also indicated an effective deproteinization process in chitin extraction. In comparison, the commercial chitin used as standard contained 1.6% ash and 6.2% nitrogen.

molecules-17-04604-t001_Table 1

Chemical composition of dried raw materials and chitin from adult H. parallela and shrimp chitin.

Moisture (%) Ash (%) Nitrogen (%) a
Dried raw materials 3.63 ± 0.04 5.53 ± 0.23 11.29 ± 0.03
Beetle chitin 7.12 ± 0.16 2.20 ± 0.13 6.33 ± 0.06
Shrimp chitin 7.64 ± 0.06 1.59 ± 0.12 6.22 ± 0.06

a measured by the Kjeldahl method.

The yield of chitin from adult H. parallela is around 15%. The yields of chitin from other insects varied with species and their development stages. Bombyx mori larva cuticle and silkworm pupa exuviae were reported to yield 15–20% of chitin [9]. A higher chitin yield of 36% was reported for cicada sloughs [12]. In comparison, the yields of α-chitin from crustacean shells are about 7–40%, depending on the species [18]. Adult H. parallela is thus a promising alternative source of chitin.

 2.2. Characterization of Chitin 2.2.1. IR Analysis

The IR spectra of chitin from shrimp and H. parallela are shown in Figure 1. They were quite similar, and comparable to those of α-chitin from other sources in the literature [10,20]. The spectra were characterized by three significant amide bands at 1,654, 1,560 and 1,310 cm−1, which correspond to the amide Ι stretching of C=O, the amide ΙΙ of N-H and amide ΙΙΙ of C-N, respectively. It is important to note that the amide Ι band of α-chitin splits at 1,654 and 1,627 cm−1, which is attributed to the two types of H-bonds formed by amide groups in the antiparallel alignment present in crystalline regions of α-chitin [21,22]. Table 2 showed the assignment of the relevant bands of chitins from shrimp and H. parallela. From this result, it was demonstrated that both chitins are in α form. The degree of acetylation (DA) values of chitin from shrimp and H. parallela calculated using the formula (1) were 94.3% and 93.1%, respectively.

molecules-17-04604-t002_Table 2

Assignments of the relevant bands of IR spectra of chitin from shrimp and adult H. parallela.

Assignments Wave Number (cm−1)
Beetle Chitin Shrimp Chitin
ν (O-H) 3,424 3,440
ν (N-H) 3,262 3,268
ν (COCH3) 2,934 2,932
ν (C-H) 2,884 2,874
ν (C-O) 1,655 1,654
ν (C=O of N-acetyl group) 1,624 1,627
δ (N-H of N-acetyl group) 1,560 1,560

IR spectra of α-chitin from shrimp (A) and from adult H. parallela (B).

 2.2.2. Elemental Analysis

Elemental analysis of chitins from shrimp and H. parallela, including the carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen contents and C/N ratio are shown in Table 3. From chitin, the nitrogen contents of the sample come mainly from protein and chitin. The total nitrogen content of the beetle before chitin extraction was ~11% (by Kjeldahl method). After extraction, the resultant nitrogen content dropped to 6.45%. This value was lower than the theoretical value (6.9%) calculated for a completely acetylated chitin, indicating the minimum amount of protein left.

molecules-17-04604-t003_Table 3

The elemental analysis of chitin from shrimp and H. parallela and the corresponding degree of acetylation (DA).

Samples Content (%) C/N
N C H
Shrimp chitin 6.24 43.75 6.40 7.07
Insect chitin 6.45 44.36 5.92 6.88
2.2.3. XRD Analysis

Figure 2 represents the XRD pattern for α-chitin from shrimp and H. parallela. From the results, both chitin samples showed similar XRD patterns, with strong reflections at 9.2 and 19.1° and minor reflections at 12.6, 22.9 and 26.2° (Figure 2A,B). Chitin from other beetle species like cicada sloughs was reported to show a similar result, with reflections at 2θ 9.20, 12.60, 19.18, 20.68, 23.30 and 26.48° [12]. The crystalline index (CrI) of chitin was calculated from the XRD data. The results showed that both chitins have nearly the same crystallinity, 89.17 and 89.05% for chitin from shrimp and H. parallela, respectively. Chitin from cicada sloughs had a similar crystallinity of 89.7% (CrI110). However, a much lower crystallinity, only 54 and 58%, was found in chitins from larva cuticles and silkworm pupa exuviae (Bombyx mori), respectively [9]. The authors inferred that the low molecular weight compound catechol that remained in the insect chitin was probably the reason for the low crystallinity.

The XRD patterns of chitin from shrimp (A) and H. parallela (B).

 2.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Figure 3 shows the SEM photographs of commercial chitin from shrimp and chitin from H. parallela. Both samples exhibited rough and thick surface morphology under electron microscopic examination at 50× magnification.

SEM micrographs for α-chitin from shrimp at 50× magnification (A) and at 3,000× magnification (B) and from adult H. parallela at 50× magnification (C) and at 3,000× magnification (D).

Similar results can be seen in the SEM photographs of the beetle chitin from cicada sloughs [12]. At higher magnification (3,000×), chitin from shrimp (Figure 3B) was found to be distinctly arranged in a microfibrillar crystalline structure, more noticeable than chitin from adult H. parallela (Figure 3D).

 3. Experimental 3.1. Isolation of Chitin from Adult H. parallela

Adult H. parallela were captured in July in peanut fields in the suburbs of Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, as part of the usual control of this pest. The beetles were starved for 48 h to eliminate gut contents, washed with water and killed by freezing. They were allowed to thaw at room temperature and then air-dried at 50 °C for 2 days. The dried beetles were milled to a powder to pass through a 20-mesh screen and stored at 4 °C in airtight containers. The powder (5 g) was treated with 1 M HCl solution (250 mL) at 100 °C for 30 min to remove minerals and catechols. The demineralization step was followed by rinsing with distilled water until neutrality was reached. Deproteinization was performed using alkaline treatment with 1 M NaOH (250 mL) solution at 80 °C for 24 h, and the product was washed with distilled water until the pH became neutral. For the purpose of decolorization, the precipitate was treated further with 1% potassium permanganate solution (100 mL) for 1 h. Finally, lightly brown chitin was washed with distilled water and dried at 50 °C in a dry heat sterilizer.

 3.2. Infrared Spectra (IR) Analysis

Chitin samples were characterized from 4,000 to 400 cm−1 by infrared spectrophotometry (WGH-30/30A, Gangdong Technology Ltd., Tianjin, China) in KBr pellets. Commercial chitin from shrimp (Sigma) was used as standard. The DA of both chitin samples was determined by comparing the absorbance of the measured peak to that of the reference peak. The DA was calculated from the absorbance (A) ratios according to the following equation [10]:

      DA = (A1655/A3450) × 100       (1)

 3.3. Elemental Analysis

Elemental analysis was performed using a Vario EL III analyzer (Elementar, Hanau, Germany) at the Institute of Chemistry, Qingdao University of Science and Technology according to the standard operation procedures provided by the manufacturer.

 3.4. X-ray Chitin Powder Diffraction

XRD analysis was used to detect the crystallinity of chitins prepared, and their patterns were recorded using a D/Max-rA diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with Cu radiation at the Institute of Chemistry, Qingdao University of Science and Technology. Data were collected at a scan rate of 1°/min with the scan angle from 5° to 40°. The crystalline index (CrI) was determined by the following equation:

      CrI110 = [(I110 − Iam)/I110] × 100       (2)

where I110 is the maximum intensity at 2θ ≌ 20° and Iam is the intensity of amorphous diffraction at 2θ ≌ 16°.

 3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The surface morphology of chitin was examined with JSM-6700F scanning electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) at the Institute of Chemistry, Qingdao University of Science and Technology. The dried samples were ground, fixed on an adhesive tape and then coated with a thin gold layer by a sputter coater. The SEM was conducted at 5.0 kV.

 3.6. Composition Analysis

Moisture and ash were assayed according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists methods (AOAC, 2006) (AOAC methods 934.01 and 942.05). Nitrogen content was measured by the Kjeldahl method (AOAC method 984.13).

 4. Conclusions

Chitin was isolated from adult H. parallela using standard methods. The low levels of ash and nitrogen contents are indicative of the effectiveness of the chitin extraction method. The characteristics of chitin from adult H. parallela were similar to those of commercial chitin from shrimp by IR, XRD, SEM and elemental analysis. The chitin extracted from adult H. parallela is thus suitable for chitosan production. Adult H. parallela is an alternative source of chitin. The large numbers of H. parallela adults captured for the control of this pest in fields every year provide an abundant source for the production of chitin. In addition, attempts to domesticate the beetle will help relieve the impact to ecological systems in the future.

 Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31100205; 31000728), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-14), the National Key Technology R&D Program (2012BAK17B13), the Promotive Research Fund for Young and Middle-aged Scientists of Shandong Province (BS2010NY023), the Natural Science Fund of Shangdong Province (ZR2009DQ004; ZR2011CQ036), Qingdao Municipal Science and Technology Plan Project (11-2-3-26-nsh; 11-2-4-9-(3)-jch).

 References and Notes Rudall K.M. Kenchington W. The chitin system Biol. Rev. 1973 48 597 633 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1973.tb01570.x Cabib E. Bowers B. Sburlati A. Silverman S.J. Fungal cell wall synthesis: The construction of a biological structure Microbiol. Sci. 1988 5 370 375 3079180 Shahidi F. Abuzaytoun R. Chitin, chitosan, and co-products: Chemistry, production, applications, and health effects Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2005 49 93 135 10.1016/S1043-4526(05)49003-8 Khor E. Lim L.Y. Implantable applications of chitin and chitosan Biomaterials 2003 24 2339 2349 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00026-7 Shahidi F. Arachchi J.K.V. Jeon Y.J. Food applications of chitin and chitosans Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1999 10 37 51 10.1016/S0924-2244(99)00017-5 Ong S.Y. Wu J. Moochhala S.M. Tan M.H. Lu J. Development of a chitosan-based wound dressing with improved hemostatic and antimicrobial properties Biomaterials 2008 29 4323 4332 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.034 Aranaz I. Mengibar M. Harris R. Panos I. Miralles B. Acosta N. Galed G. Heras A. Functional characterization of chitin and chitosan Curr. Chem. Biol. 2009 3 203 230 10.2174/187231309788166415 Labandeira C.C. Sepkoski J.J. Jr. Insect diversity in the fossil record Science 1993 261 310 315 10.1126/science.1153654811536548 Zhang M. Haga A. Sekiguchi H. Hirano S. Structure of insect chitin isolated from beetle larva cuticle and silkworm (Bombyx mori) pupa exuvia Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2000 27 99 105 10.1016/S0141-8130(99)00123-3 Majtan J. Bilikova K. Markovic O. Grof J. Kogan G. Simuth J. Isolation and characterization of chitin from bumblebee (Bombus terrestris) Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2007 40 237 241 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.07.010 Ai H. Wang F. Yang Q. Zhu F. Lei C. Preparation and biological activities of chitosan from the larvae of housefly, Musca domestica Carbohydr. Polym. 2008 72 419 423 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.010 Sajomsang W. Gonil P. Preparation and characterization of α-chitin from cicada sloughs Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2010 30 357 363 10.1016/j.msec.2009.11.014 Paulino A.T. Simionato J.I. Garcia J.C. Nozaki J. Characterization of chitosan and chitin produced from silkworm crysalides Carbohydr. Polym. 2006 64 98 103 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.10.032 Hu P. Cha L. Records of edible insects from China Agric. Sci. Technol. 2009 10 114 118 Dong Q.F. Wang J.L. Zhang S.F. Wang Z. Zhang C.X. Gao H. Zhang H.M. Zhang L. Antifungal activity of crude extracts and fat-soluble constituents of Holotrichia diomphalia larvae Bioresour. Technol. 2008 99 8521 8523 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.01018424040 Watanabe H. Satrawaha R. A list of edible insects sold at the public market in Khon Kaen, Northeast Thailand J.Southeast Asian Stud. 1984 22 316 325 Zhou L.M. Ju Q. Qu M.J. Ye M. Wang L. Zhao Z.Q. Du L.T. The research on artificial rearing of Holotrichia parallela and it’s susceptive to insecticides J. Peanut Sci. 2008 37 46 48 Tolaimate A. Desbrieres J. Rhazi M. Alagui A. Contribution to the preparation of chitins and chitosans with controlled physico-chemical properties Polymer 2003 44 7939 7952 10.1016/j.polymer.2003.10.025 Verkerk M.C. Tramper J. van Trijp J.C.M. Martens D.E. Insect cells for human food Biotechnol. Adv. 2007 25 198 202 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.11.004 Sagheer F.A.A. Al-Sughayer M.A. Muslim S. Elsabee M.Z. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from marine sources in Arabian Gulf Carbohydr. Polym. 2009 77 410 419 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.01.032 Focher B. Naggi A. Torri G. Cosani A. Terbojevich M. Chitosans from Euphausia superba. 2: Characterization of solid state structure Carbohydr. Polym. 1992 18 43 49 10.1016/0144-8617(92)90186-T Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications Prog. Polym. Sci. 2006 31 603 632 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2006.06.001

Sample Availability: Samples of the chitin from adult H. parallela are available from the authors.