Next Article in Journal
Syntheses and Cell-Based Phenotypic Screen of Novel 7-Amino pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-6-carbonitrile Derivatives as Potential Antiproliferative Agents
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance to Oxidation of Moringa peregrina Seed Oil
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 17
Issue 3
10.3390/molecules17032335
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Studies of the (Anti) Mutagenicity of Baccharis dracunculifolia and Artepillin C by the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test

by
Flávia Aparecida Resende
1,
Carla Carolina Munari
2,
Moacir De Azevedo Bentes Monteiro Neto
2,
Denise Crispim Tavares
2,
Jairo Kenupp Bastos
3,
Ademar Alves Da Silva Filho
4 and
Eliana Aparecida Varanda
1,*
1
Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara, Universidade Estadual Paulista Julio de Mesquita Filho,14801-902, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil
2
Universidade de Franca, 14404-600, Franca, São Paulo, Brazil
3
Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, 14040-903, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
4
Departamento de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 36035-900, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2012, 17(3), 2335-2350; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032335
Submission received: 29 January 2012 / Revised: 15 February 2012 / Accepted: 15 February 2012 / Published: 24 February 2012
(This article belongs to the Section Natural Products Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Baccharis dracunculifolia is a plant native from Brazil, commonly known as ‘Alecrim-do-campo’ and ‘Vassoura’ and used in alternative medicine for the treatment of inflammation, hepatic disorders and stomach ulcers. Previous studies reported that artepillin C (ArtC, 3-{4-hydroxy-3,5-di(3-methyl-2-butenyl)phenyl}-2(E)-propenoic acid), is the main compound of interest in the leaves. This study was undertaken to assess the mutagenic effect of the ethyl acetate extract of B. dracunculifolia leaves (Bd-EAE: 11.4–182.8 µg/plate) and ArtC (0.69–10.99 µg/plate) by the Ames test using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA97a, TA100 and TA102, and to compare the protective effects of Bd-EAE and ArtC against the mutagenicity of a variety of direct and indirect acting mutagens such as 4-nitro-O-phenylenediamine, sodium azide, mitomycin C, benzo[a]pyrene, aflatoxin B1, 2-aminoanthracene and 2-aminofluorene.The mutagenicity test showed that Bd-EAE and ArtC did not induce an increase in the number of revertant colonies indicating absence of mutagenic activity. ArtC showed a similar antimutagenic effect to that of Bd-EAE in some strains of S. typhimurium, demonstrating that the antimutagenic activity of Bd-EAE can be partially attributed to ArtC. The present results showed that the protective effect of whole plant extracts is due to the combined and synergistic effects of a complex mixture of phytochemicals, the total activity of which may result in health benefits.

1. Introduction

Plants have been employed in medicine for more than 60,000 years. However, they are frequently employed without scientific knowledge of their biological and therapeutic properties. Recently, scientific study of their chemical properties, biological activities or genotoxic properties has been emerging as a health priority [1].
Baccharis dracunculifolia De Candole (Asteraceae) is a native plant from Brazil, commonly known as ‘Alecrim-do-campo’ and ‘Vassoura’. B. dracunculifolia is the most important botanical source of green propolis in Southeast Brazil, which is named for its colour [2]. Teas, decoctions and tinctures prepared from the flowering plant are widely used in alternative medicine for the treatment of inflammation, hepatic disorders and stomach ulcers [3]. Thus, in recent years, interest in the chemical composition of B. dracunculifolia, as well as in its biological activities, has grown substantially [4].
B. dracunculifolia exhibits anticariogenic [5], anti-ulcer [2], trypanocidal [6], antimicrobial [3], antimutagenic [7] and immunomodulatory [8] activities. Previous phytochemical studies of this plant have shown that artepillin C (ArtC, 3-{4-hydroxy-3,5-di(3-methyl-2-butenyl)phenyl}-2(E)-propenoic acid, Figure 1), a low-molecular weight phenolic compound, is the main compound of interest in the leaves of B. dracunculifolia [9], and the HPLC phenolic profile (Figure 2) of B. dracunculifolia ethyl acetate extract (Bd-EAE) displays ArtC as the major peak [7]. In addition, Shimizu et al. [10] found that ArtC was a highly bioavailable component of Brazilian propolis.
Molecules 17 02335 g001 550
Figure 1. Chemical structure of artepillin C.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of artepillin C.
Molecules 17 02335 g001
Molecules 17 02335 g002 550
Figure 2. HPLC profile of Bd-EAE. 1: caffeic acid; 2: p-coumaric acid; 3: aromadendrin-4′-O-methyl ether; 4: 3-prenyl-p-coumaric acid (drupanin); 5:3,5-diprenyl p-coumaric acid (artepillin C); 6: baccharin.
Figure 2. HPLC profile of Bd-EAE. 1: caffeic acid; 2: p-coumaric acid; 3: aromadendrin-4′-O-methyl ether; 4: 3-prenyl-p-coumaric acid (drupanin); 5:3,5-diprenyl p-coumaric acid (artepillin C); 6: baccharin.
Molecules 17 02335 g002
ArtC is considered a candidate for one of the active compounds preventing cancer in propolis [11]. Thus, it is an excellent scavenger of free radicals, similar to catechins [12]. Moreover, ArtC possesses antimicrobial [13], antitumor [11,14], anti-inflammatory [15], apoptosis-inducing [16], immuno-modulatory [8] and antioxidant properties [12,17].
Since some authors claim that most of the biological activities of B. dracunculifolia are due to its high levels of prenylated p-coumaric acids, mainly ArtC and baccharin [18,19,20], comparative studies of mutagenic and antimutagenic effects would be of great value to determine if B. dracunculifolia and ArtC exhibit comparable biological activities. Besides this, the evaluation of the mutagenic effect is an important approach for safe use of the medicinal plants.
Therefore, in this study the Ames test was used to assess the mutagenic effects of the ethyl acetate extract of B. dracunculifolia leaves (Bd-EAE) and ArtC and to compare the protective effects of Bd-EAE and ArtC against the mutagenicity of several direct and indirect-acting mutagens such as 4-nitro-O-phenylenediamine (NOPD), sodium azide (SA), mitomycin C (MMC), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), 2-aminoanthracene (AA) and 2-aminofluorene (AF).

2. Results

2.1. Mutagenic Activity

None of the strains of S. typhimurium, exposed to different concentrations of Bd-EAE and ArtC, showed two-fold or greater increase in the mean number of revertants as compared to the negative control group, as given in Table 1, which lists the mean number of revertants/plate (M), the standard deviation (SD) and the mutagenic index (MI) after the treatments with Bd-EAE and ArtC, observed in S. typhimurium strain TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA97a in the presence (+S9) and absence (-S9) of metabolic activation. The mutagenicity assays show that neither Bd-EAE nor ArtC induced any increase in the number of revertant colonies, indicating the absence of any mutagenic activity.
Table
Table 1. Revertants/ plate, standard deviation and mutagenicity index (in brackets) in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA97a of S. typhimurium after treatment with various doses of Bd-EAE and ArtC, with (+S9) and without (−S9) metabolic activation
Table 1. Revertants/ plate, standard deviation and mutagenicity index (in brackets) in the strains TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA97a of S. typhimurium after treatment with various doses of Bd-EAE and ArtC, with (+S9) and without (−S9) metabolic activation
TreatmentsNumber of revertants (M ± SD)/ plate and MI
TA 98TA 100TA 102TA 97
µg/plate− S9+ S9− S9+ S9− S9+ S9− S9+ S9
Bd-EAE0.00 a20 ± 227 ± 6 154 ± 10210 ± 14 255 ± 11285 ± 24132 ± 7263 ± 7
11.419 ± 1 (0.9)26 ± 2 (1.1)137 ± 8 (0.8)211 ± 3 (0.9)282 ± 17 (1.0)327 ± 10 (1.1)137 ± 11 (0.9)280 ± 29 (1.1)
22.821 ± 5 (1.0)32 ± 2 (1.4)150 ± 11 (0.9)210 ± 3 (0.9)272 ± 11 (0.9)306 ± 6 (1.0)132 ± 12 (0.9)292 ± 28 (1.1)
45.619 ± 3 (0.9)32 ± 5 (1.4)150 ± 8 (0.9)215 ± 8 (1.0)283 ± 11 (1.0)304 ± 9 (1.0)133 ± 15 (0.9)275 ± 21 (1.0)
91.422 ± 3 (1.0)30 ± 4 (1.3)142 ± 11 (0.9)203 ± 8 (0.9)234 ± 3 (0.8)322 ± 13 (1.1)135 ± 6 (0.9)255 ± 15 (1.0)
182.821 ± 5 (1.0)23 ± 3 (1.0)138 ± 13 (0.8)200 ± 9 (0.9)196 ± 6 (0.7)341 ± 13 (1.1)91 ± 17 (0.6) 238 ± 27 (0.9)
Ctrol +1347 ± 88 b1567 ± 115 e1582 ± 98 c1456 ± 78 e1656 ± 60 d1932 ± 97 f1766.0 ± 49 b1789 ± 89 e
ArtC0.00 a20 ± 330 ± 3152 ± 2164 ± 4216 ± 2216 ± 2150 ± 15155 ± 2
0.6921 ± 3 (1.0)28 ± 3 (0.9)179 ± 4 (1.2)171 ± 1 (1.0)204 ± 4 (0.9)204 ± 4 (0.9)207 ± 3 (1.4)194 ± 3 (1.2)
1.3724 ± 4 (1.2)32 ± 1 (1.1)174 ± 4 (1.1)171 ± 2 (1.0)213 ± 3 (1.0)213 ± 3 (1.0)221 ± 6 (1.5)174 ± 1 (1.1)
2.7528 ± 5 (1.4)29 ± 3 (1.0)169 ± 6 (1.1)144 ± 2 (0.9)187 ± 5 (0.9)187 ± 5 (0.9)246 ± 5 (1.6)175 ± 4 (1.1)
5.4929 ± 1 (1.5)32 ± 2 (1.1)158 ± 7 (1.0)153 ± 2 (0.9)215 ± 5 (1.0)215 ± 5 (1.0)207 ± 5 (1.4)175 ± 1 (1.1)
10.9927 ± 2 (1.3)31 ± 1 (1.0)153 ± 3 (1.0)129 ± 1 (0.8)203 ± 6 (0.9)203 ± 6 (0.9)192 ± 6 (1.3)176 ± 3 (1.1)
Ctrol +842 ± 34 b1498 ± 33 e2189 ± 73 c1072 ± 25 e1139 ± 42 d1099 ± 27 f1106 ± 23 b1861 ± 23 e
Bd-EAE = ethyl acetate extract of B. dracunculifolia leaves; ArtC = artepillin C; M ± SD = mean and standard deviation; MI = mutagenicity index; a Negative control: dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO - 50 μL/ plate); Ctrol + = Positive control; b 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine (NOPD – 10.0 μg/ plate – TA98, TA97a); c sodium azide (1.25 μg/ plate – TA100); d mitomycin (0.5 μg/ plate – TA102), in the absence of S9 and e 2-anthramine (1.25 μg/ plate – TA 97a, TA98, TA100); f 2-aminofluorene (10.0 μg/ plate – TA102), in the presence of S9.

2.2. Antimutagenic Activity

The results obtained from studies on the antimutagenic potential of Bd-EAE and ArtC are presented in Table 2. The results are expressed as mean number of revertants/ plate (M), the standard deviation (SD) and the percent inhibition of mutagenic activity of a sample containing a mixture of mutagen and Bd-EAE or mutagen and ArtC, relative to the mutagenicity of the mutagen alone.
When strain TA98 was used in association with NOPD, a moderate antimutagenic effect was observed for the B. dracunculifolia extract, while ArtC showed a strong inhibitoty effect (42%). In experiments with metabolic activation for strain TA98, the antimutagenic activity of Bd-EAE against mutations induced by B[a]P was similar to that of ArtC: the mutagenicity of B[a]P was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner by 30 to 60% for Bd-EAE, and 38 to 62% for ArtC.
The Bd-EAE and ArtC did not reduce mutagenesis induced by SA, in the absence of metabolic activation, when strain TA100 was used. However, both Bd-EAE and ArtC did inhibit mutation induced by the alkylating agent AFB1 in TA100. The highest observed percent inhibition of mutagenicity (85%) was achieved with Bd-EAE, using strain TA100 in the presence of AFB1.
No reduction in the number of revertant colonies was observed for mutations induced by MMC in strain TA102. Moreover, Bd-EAE was not antimutagenic or produced insignificant decreases in the mutagenicity of AF in TA102, but ArtC induced a strong, dose-dependent effect, with % inhibition from 41 to 55%.
Only in the strain TA97a did Bd-EAE show a better effect than ArtC. In TA97a, Bd-EAE reduced the mutagenicity of NOPD by 45% and of AA by 36%. The ArtC showed no antimutagenic activity, against either NOPD or AA, in this strain.

3. Discussion

Medicinal plants have traditionally been used worldwide for the treatment of various human diseases [21]. They have proved to be abundant sources of biologically active compounds, many of which have been used as lead compounds to develop new pharmaceuticals [22]. However, a drug candidate that is active in a mutagenicity test or that produces mutagenic metabolites by activation in a microsomal enzyme system will generally be discarded in favor of a backup candidate [23].
The mutagenic activity of Bd-EAE, extracted from B.dracunculifolia leaves, and of the major compound present in the leaves (ArtC), and their influence on the activities of known mutagenic agents were assessed by Ames test in this study. Bd-EAE and ArtC alone had no mutagenic effect on the strains tested, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. The absence of such an effect by Bd-EAE against S. typhimurium bacterial strains in the Ames assay is a positive step towards determining its safe use in traditional medicine. Considering the popular use of this plant and the promising chemopreventive activity of ArtC, a lack of mutagenic effect in bacterial systems is highly relevant.
Table
Table 2. Antimutagenic activity expressed as the mean and standard deviation of number of revertants and percent inhibition by Bd-EAE and ArtC of direct (-S9) and indirect (+S9) mutagens, tested on strains TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA 97a of S. typhimurium.
Table 2. Antimutagenic activity expressed as the mean and standard deviation of number of revertants and percent inhibition by Bd-EAE and ArtC of direct (-S9) and indirect (+S9) mutagens, tested on strains TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA 97a of S. typhimurium.
TreatmentsNumber of revertants (M ± SD)/ plate and % of inhibition
TA 98TA 100
µg/plate− S9% inhibition+ S9% inhibition− S9% inhibition+ S9% inhibition
Bd-EAECtrol +NOPD B[a]P AS AFB1
638 ± 30444 ± 141115 ± 362200 ± 140
11.4482 ± 4124 *312 ± 9 30 **1126 ± 57-1517 ± 7831 **
22.8453 ± 1929 **247 ± 10 44 ***1178 ± 61-1571 ± 8629 **
45.6466 ± 3527 **218 ± 5 51 ***1152 ± 77-1467 ± 8533 **
91.4449 ± 1030 **196 ± 4 56 ***1123 ± 17-741 ± 6266 ***
182.8480 ± 2725 *175 ± 4 60 ***1186 ± 53-327 ± 4485 ***
ArtCCtrol +842 ± 34 498 ± 33 2189 ± 73 2171 ± 33
0.69526 ± 1237 **309 ± 1738 **1833 ± 4816 *1595 ± 3726 **
1.37520 ± 1838 **282 ± 2343 ***1957 ± 3611 *1639 ± 3324 *
2.75484 ± 3142 ***218 ± 2456 ***1813 ± 2417 *1575 ± 1127 **
5.49532 ± 2737 **217 ± 2756 ***1727 ± 3921 *1600 ± 3826 **
10.99499 ± 2641 ***189 ± 2662 ***1885 ± 2514 *1507 ± 4330 **
TA 102TA 97a
µg/plate− S9% inhibition+ S9% inhibition− S9% inhibition+ S9% inhibition
Bd-EAECtrol +MMC AF NOPD AA
935 ± 181336 ± 24884 ± 342312 ± 81
11.41666 ± 87-1302 ± 82*672± 1124 *1816 ± 7621 *
22.81309 ± 56-1344 ± 29-613 ± 6831 **1731 ± 6425 **
45.61317 ± 72-1363 ± 27-633 ± 5528 **1659 ± 8228 **
91.41011 ± 76-1357 ± 9-486 ± 3545 ***1603 ± 2731 **
182.8891 ± 48-1209 ± 59 *488 ± 6545 ***1481 ± 6336 **
ArtCCtrol +1072 ± 25 1099 ± 27 1106 ± 23 1861 ± 23
0.691096 ± 19-645 ± 2341 ***876 ± 821 *1603 ± 2614 *
1.371022 ± 185 *595 ± 2546 ***862 ± 1422 *1617 ± 1613 *
2.75994 ± 257 *566 ± 1748 ***885 ± 1920 *1669 ± 1910 *
5.49943 ± 1712 *488 ± 1456 ***933 ± 716 *1620 ± 2113 *
10.99879 ± 1118 *529 ± 20 52 ***891 ± 1719 *1602 ± 1714 *
Bd-EAE = ethyl acetate extract of B. dracunculifolia leaves; ArtC = artepillin C; M ± SD = mean and standard deviation; Ctrol + = positive Control; NOPD = 4 -nitro-o-phenylenediamine (10.0 μg/ plate – TA98 and TA97a); SA = sodium azide (1.25 μg/ plate – TA100); MMC = mitomycin (0.5 μg/ plate – TA102), in the absence of S9 and B[a]P= benzo[a]pyrene (1.0 μg/ plate – TA 98); AFB1 = aflatoxin B1 (0.5 μg/ plate – TA 100); AA = 2-anthramine (1.25 μg/ plate – TA 97a); AF = 2-aminofluorene (10.0 μg/ plate – TA102), in the presence of S9; * no antimutagenic effect (< 25% inhibition); ** moderate effect (25% - 40% inhibition); *** strong antimutagenic effect (> 40% inhibition).
In a previous study, we also observed that Bd-EAE itself was not mutagenic in the rat micronucleus assay [7]. Andrade et al. [24] observed that the administration of high single doses of Bd-EAE did not induce any genotoxic response in blood cells of Swiss mice. Recently, Monteiro Neto et al. [25] evaluated the genotoxic potential of ArtC, and the results showed that ArtC itself was not genotoxic in the mouse micronucleus and comet assays.
Generally, cancer begins after a mutational episode in a single cell which multiplies and then progressively transforms to malignancy in multiple stages through sequential acquisition of additional mutations. In view of the fact that these initial events are the underlying causes of the whole progression of carcinogenesis, their inhibition would be an efficient preventive measure [26].
The antimutagenic properties of B. dracunculifolia have been studied, mainly because it is the main plant source of green propolis [7,24,27,28]. The results strongly suggest that B. dracunculifolia leaf bud extracts might display biological activities similar to those described for propolis. As it is hard to standardize propolis, because its activity and chemical composition may vary according to geographic location and plant source [7,29], the B. dracunculifolia extracts might be successfully incorporated into pharmaceutical products [7].
In view of the promising results obtained in experiments with B. dracunculifolia, and considering that the extract is a complex mixture of several unknown organic compounds [1], the evaluation of isolated compounds is even more relevant.
In this study, Bd-EAE and ArtC exhibited a protective effect against the mutagenicity induced by direct and indirect acting mutagens in the Ames test. They showed antimutagenic potential in more than one test strain and acted against various mutational mechanisms. NOPD, SA and MMC (direct mutagens), and B[a]P, AFB1, AA and AF (indirect mutagens) were included among these mutagens.
In general, inhibitors of mutagenesis can act in one of several ways: By inhibiting the interaction between genes and biochemically reactive mutagens; inhibiting metabolic activation of indirectly acting mutagens by inactivation of metabolizing enzymes, or interacting with the pro-mutagens making them unavailable for the enzymatic process [30].
In the present study, Bd-EAE and ArtC demonstrated antimutagenic properties against frameshift mutations induced by the direct mutagen NOPD in the TA98 strain: Bd-EAE showed a moderate protective effect of 30% inhibition and ArtC showed a strong protective effect of 42% inhibition. In the TA97a strain, Bd-EAE reduced mutagenicity of NOPD by 45%, but ArtC showed no antimutagenic activity in this strain. The S. typhimurium test strain TA97a detects frameshift mutations in C-C-C-C-C-C; +1 cytosine and TA98 frameshift in DNA target-C-G-C-G-C-G-C-G [31].
The protection of the bacterial genome against directly acting mutagens may be due to the rapid elimination of mutagens from bacteria before their interaction with the DNA [32]. Bd-EAE and ArtC may facilitate or stimulate the bacterial transmembrane export system to eliminate the mutagens; they may also interfere with the uptake of mutagens into bacteria [32,33]. Bd-EAE and ArtC did not affect the SA-induced mutagenicity in strain TA100 and MMC in strain TA102.
Shimizu et al. [11] demonstrated that when ArtC reaches the liver, it stimulates the production of glutathione-S-transferase, an enzyme involved in cellular defenses against reactive oxygen compounds, as well as inducing the expression of phase II enzymes, which are responsible for the detoxification of carcinogens and, consequently, the suppression of precancerous lesions. This might explain the results obtained in the Ames test with metabolic activation, especially if we consider also that the biological activities of B. dracunculifolia are mostly due to its high levels of ArtC.
Bd-EAE and ArtC interacted with active intermediates, such as B[a]P, a well-known environmental procarcinogen, in tests on strain T98 with metabolic activation. The mutagenicity of B[a]P was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner by 30 to 60% by Bd-EAE, and 38 to 62% by ArtC.
B[a]P, a typical polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon, is formed during incomplete combustion of organic matter and is a prevalent environmental pollutant. The levels of B[a]P in normal air range from 0.1 to 66 ng/m3, but occupational exposure during industrial and other domestic activities can increase these levels to 49 μg/m3. B[a]P has been detected in food, ranging from <0.1 to 7.2 μg/kg and in drinking water, ranging from 0.2 to 1,000 ng/L. The routes of human exposure to B[a]P are the ingestion of contaminated food and water and the inhalation of particulates in the ambient air and cigarette smoking [34].
Enzymatic activation of B[a]P by certain types of cytochrome P450 (CYP) found in the subcellular microsomal fraction, especially CYP1A1, is needed to produce the final carcinogen, (±)-benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide [35]. This diol epoxide exerts its carcinogenic activity by alkylating nucleosides on DNA molecules at its bay region. The reaction occurs primarily with the purine bases, deoxyguanosine and deoxyadenosine, in DNA [36]. As a result, bulky stable and depurinating DNA adducts are formed [37,38]. Insufficient removal of these DNA adducts prior to replication creates hot spots in the gene and can result in deactivation of tumor suppressor genes or activation of oncogenes leading to tumor initiation [39,40].
There are at least two possible mechanisms through which Bd-EAE and ArtC can decrease B[a]P-DNA adduct formation, either by interacting with reactive intermediates or by interfering with the action of microsomal enzymes (e.g., CYP1A1) [40]. However, more studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
Bd-EAE and ArtC also reduced the frequency of mutations induced by the fungal toxin, AFB1, in TA100 with metabolic activation, resulting in the highest percent inhibition of mutagenicity (85%) attained with Bd-EAE. The S. typhimurium tester strain TA100, is capable of revealing base-pair-substitution point mutations.
Aflatoxins, a group of potent mycotoxins with mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic, hepatotoxic and immunosuppressive properties, are of particular importance because of their adverse effects on animal and human health. Aflatoxins are produced as secondary metabolites by fungi of various species of Aspergillus (A. flavus, A. parasiticus and A. nomius) that grow on a variety of food and feed commodities. AFB1, which is the most toxic aflatoxin, is of particular interest because it is a frequent contaminant of many food products and one of the most potent naturally occurring mutagens and carcinogens known [41].
ArtC also induced a strong antimutagenic effect, significantly diminishing the mutagenicity of AF in TA102 with metabolic activation, in a dose-dependent manner, with 41 to 55% inhibition. No reduction in the number of revertant colonies induced by AF in the strain TA102 was observed with Bd-EAE. The S. typhimurium tester strain TA102 is normally used to detect cross-linking agents and base-pair-substitution mutations [31].
Alteration of the structure and function of P450 enzyme may result in altered rates and differential pathways of metabolism of mutagens and carcinogens, and provide protection against chemically-induced mutagenesis [30].
Other antimutagenicity studies have demonstrated that Bd-EAE and ArtC are able to protect against DNA damage induced by methyl methanesulfonate and doxorubicin, measured by micronucleus and comet assays [24,25].
Methyl methanesulfonate has been used for several decades as an experimental model to elucidate the mutagenic mechanisms of alkylating agents [25,42,43]. On the other hand, free radical production is considered the primary mechanism responsible for the toxicity of doxorubicin [44]. This results in oxidative stress and causes DNA damage, in turn leading to mutations and cancer development [25,45].
In this study, the antimutagenic property of Bd-EAE related to its ability to modulate the xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the liver, either by preventing the metabolic activation, or by altering the enzymatic activity in the detoxification pathway to induce the disposal of the known mutagen [26], was again illustrated by the results obtained with the mutagen 2-AA in strain TA97a with metabolic activation, where 35.9% inhibition was observed.

4. Experimental

4.1. Chemicals and Culture Media

Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate sodium salt (NADP), D-glucose-6-phosphate disodium salt, magnesium chloride, L-histidine monohydrate, D-biotin, NOPD, SA, MMC, AA, AF, B[a]P and AFB1 were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Oxoid Nutrient Broth Nº. 2 (Oxoid, England) and Difco Bacto Agar (Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) were used as bacterial media. D-glucose, magnesium sulfate, citric acid monohydrate, anhydrous dibasic potassium phosphate, sodium ammonium phosphate, monobasic sodium phosphate, dibasic sodium phosphate and sodium chloride were purchased from Merck (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA).

4.2. Preparation of B. dracunculifolia Extracts and Isolation of Artepillin C

Leaves of B. dracunculifolia De Candole were collected in Cajuru, São Paulo state, Brazil, in December 2005. The plant material was authenticated by Jimi N. Nakagima, and a voucher specimen (SPFR 06143) was deposited in the herbarium of the Biology Department of the University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state, Brazil. Fresh plant material was air-dried at 40 °C for 48 h. The dried leaves (500.0 g) were powdered in a blender and submitted to maceration for 24 h in ethyl acetate at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in a vacuum below 40 °C and 32.0 g of Bd-EAE was obtained [7]. ArtC was isolated from the hexane fraction of Brazilian green propolis, as described by Monteiro Neto et al. [25].

4.3. HPLC Analysis

Bd-EAE was submitted to HPLC analysis using the following equipment and conditions: Shimadzu high performance liquid-chromatograph (SCL-10Avp system controller, three LC-10AD pumps, SPD-M10Avp photodiode array detector and Shimadzu Class-VP 5.02 software). A CLC-ODS (M) column (4.6mm i.d. × 250 mm, 5-µm particle diameter) and a CLC G-ODS guard column were used as the stationary phase. The mobile phase had the following composition: A–B: 25–100% (B) in 60 min, A: 93.9% water, 0.8% acetic acid: 0.3% ammonium acetate: 5.0% methanol; B: acetonitrile; detection: 280 nm, flow rate of 1 mL/min. Most of the compounds detected were identified by comparison with authentic standards available at the Pharmacognosy laboratory, comparing UV spectra and considering both the maximum lambda and the relative area obtained with the use of two wavelengths (A280/320). The crude Bd-EAE was dissolved in methanol (HPLC grade) to obtain a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Before analysis, all samples were centrifuged at 1,300 rpm and filtered through a 45-µm filter [7].

4.4. Metabolic Activation System (S9 mixture)

The S9 fraction, prepared from livers of Sprague-Dawley rats treated with the polychlorinated biphenyl mixture Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/ kg), was purchased from Molecular Toxicology Inc. (Boone, NC, USA). The metabolic activation system consisted of 4% of S9 fraction, 1% of 0.4 M MgCl2, 1% of 1.65 M KCl, 0.5% of 1 M D-glucose-6-phosphate disodium and 4% of 0.1 M NADP, 50% of 0.2 M phosphate buffer and 39.5% sterile distilled water [46].

4.5. Mutagenicity Assay

Mutagenic activity was evaluated by the Salmonella/ microsome assay, using the Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA98, TA100, TA97a and TA102, kindly provided by Dr. B.N. Ames (Berkeley, CA, USA), with (+S9) and without (−S9) metabolization by the pre-incubation method [46]. The strains from frozen cultures were grown overnight for 12–14 h in Oxoid Nutrient Broth No. 2. The metabolic activation mixture (S9) was freshly prepared before each test. For comparison of activity between Bd-EAE and ArtC, five different doses of the test compounds were assayed. All of them were diluted in DMSO. The concentrations of Bd-EAE were selected on the basis of a preliminary toxicity test. In all subsequent assays, the upper limit of the dose range tested was either the highest non toxic dose or the lowest toxic dose determined in this preliminary assay. Toxicity was apparent either as a reduction in the number of histidine revertants (His+), or as an alteration in the auxotrophic background (i.e., background lawn). The concentrations varied from 11.4 to 182.8 µg/ plate for Bd-EAE and 0.69 to 10.99 µg/ plate for ArtC. The tested doses of ArtC were based on the corresponding concentration of this compound (about 6%) in Bd-EAE [25]. The various concentrations of Bd-EAE and ArtC to be tested were added to 0.5 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer, or to 0.5 mL of 4% S9 mixture, with 0.1 mL of bacterial culture and then incubated at 37 °C for 20–30 min. Next, 2 mL of top agar was added and the mixture was poured on to a plate containing minimal agar. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and the His+ revertant colonies were counted manually. All experiments were analyzed in triplicate. The results were analyzed with the statistical software package Salanal (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Las Vegas, NV, version 1.0, from Research Triangle Institute, RTP, NC, USA), adopting the Bernstein et al. [47] model. The data (revertants/ plate) were assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by linear regression. The mutagenic index (MI) was also calculated for each concentration tested, this being the average number of revertants per plate with the test compound divided by the average number of revertants per plate with the negative (solvent) control. A sample was considered mutagenic when a dose-response relationship was detected and a two-fold increase in the number of mutants (MI ≥ 2) was observed with at least one concentration [48]. The standard mutagens used as positive controls in experiments without S9 mix were NOPD (10 µg/ plate) for TA98 and TA97a, SA (1.25 µg/ plate) for TA100 and MMC (0.5 µg/ plate) for TA102. In experiments with S9 activation, AA (1.25 μg /plate) was used with TA98, TA97a and TA100 and AF (10 μg/ plate) with TA102. DMSO served as the negative (solvent) control (50 µL/ plate).

4.6. Antimutagenicity Assay

The antimutagenicity assay was conducted by means of the same procedure as the mutagenicity assay, except that Bd-EAE and ArtC were associated with known mutagens in tests with and without metabolic activation. In these tests, the direct-acting mutagens were 10.0 µg/ plate of NOPD (for S. typhimurium TA98 and TA97a), 1.25 µg/ plate of SA (for S. typhimurium TA100) and 0.5 µg/ plate of MMC (for S. typhimurium TA102), in the assay without metabolic activation, and the indirect-acting mutagens were 1.0 μg/ plate of B[a]P (for S. typhimurium TA98), 0.5 μg/ plate of AFB1 (for S. typhimurium TA100), 1.25 μg/ plate of AA (for S. typhimurium TA97a) and 10 µg/ plate of AF (for S. typhimurium TA102), in the assay with metabolic activation. All the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h, and the number of revertant colonies per plate was counted manually. The entire assay was performed in triplicate. The antimutagenicity results were expressed as percent inhibition (the ability of the compounds to inhibit the action of the known mutagen). This was calculated as follows:
Inhibition (%) = 100 − [(T/M) × 100]
where T is the number of revertant colonies in the plate containing mutagen and compounds, and M is the number of revertant colonies in the plate containing only the mutagen [26].
No antimutagenic effect was recorded when inhibition was lower than 25%, a moderate effect for a value between 25% and 40%, and strong antimutagenicity for values greater than 40% [49,50].
Cell viability was also determined for each antimutagenesis experiment to assess the potential bactericidal effect of the mutagens. A substance was considered cytotoxic when the bacterial survival was less than 60% of that observed for the negative control [49,51].

5. Conclusions

In general, the results of the present study showed that Bd-EAE and ArtC alone had no mutagenic effect on the strains tested, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. With respect to the antimutagenic effect, ArtC showed a similar activity to that of Bd-EAE in some strains of S. typhimurium, demonstrating that the antimutagenic activity of Bd-EAE can be partially attributed to ArtC. The cases in which ArtC either potentiated or did not affect the activity of mutagenic agents, while Bd-EAE showed inhibitory activity, may be explained in part by a synergy between compounds present in the extract. In fact the present results support the idea that the protective effect of whole plant extracts is due to the combined and/or synergistic effects of a complex mixture of phytochemicals, the total activity of which may result in health benefits.
Moreover, in view of the above results and hypotheses, we can observe that the inhibition of mutagenesis is often complex and involves multiple mechanisms. These results emphasize that antimutagenic mechanisms among natural plant extracts cannot be generalized, and it is worthwhile investigating each of them independently.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by “Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)” and “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)”, Brazilian state and federal agencies.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest
  • Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds Bd-EAE and ArtC are available from the authors.

References and Notes

  1. Arriaga-Alba, M.; Blasco, J.L.; Ruíz-Pérez, N.J.; Sánchez-Navarrete, J.; Rivera-Sánchez, R.; González-Avila, M. Antimutagenicity mechanisms of the Rhoeo discolor ethanolic extract. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2011, 63, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lemos, M.; de Barros, M.P.; Sousa, J.P.; Silva Filho, A.A.; Bastos, J.K.; de Andrade, S.F. Baccharis dracunculifolia, the main botanical source of Brazilian green propolis, displays antiulcer activity. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007, 59, 603–608. [Google Scholar]
  3. Silva Filho, A.A.; Resende, D.O.; Fukui, M.J.; Santos, F.F.; Pauletti, P.M.; Cunha, W.R.; Silva, M.L.; Gregório, L.E.; Bastos, J.K.; Nanayakkara, N.P. In vitro antileishmanial, antiplasmodial and cytotoxic activities of phenolics and triterpenoids from Baccharis dracunculifolia D.C. (Asteraceae). Fitoterapia 2009, 80, 478–482. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sousa, J.P.; Silva Filho, A.A.; Bueno, P.C.; Gregório, L.E.; Furtado, N.A.; Jorge, R.F.; Bastos, J.K. A validated reverse-phase HPLC analytical method for the quantification of phenolic compounds in Baccharis dracunculifolia. Phytochem. Anal. 2009, 20, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Leitão, D.P.; Filho, A.A.; Polizello, A.C.; Bastos, J.K.; Spadaro, A.C. Comparative evaluation of in vitro effects of Brazilian green propolis and Baccharis dracunculifolia extracts on cariogenic factors of Streptococcus mutans. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 1834–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Silva Filho, A.A.; Bueno, P.C.P.; Gregório, L.E.; Silva, M.L.A.; Albuquerque, S.; Bastos, J.K. In vitro trypanocidal activity evaluation of crude extract and isolated compounds from Baccharis dracunculifolia D.C. (Asteraceae). J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2004, 56, 1195–1199. [Google Scholar]
  7. Resende, F.A.; Alves, J.M.; Munari, C.C.; Senedese, J.M.; Sousa, J.P.B.; Bastos, J.K.; Tavares, D.C. Inhibition of doxorubicin-induced mutagenicity by Baccharis dracunculifolia. Mut. Res. 2007, 634, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Missima, F.; da Silva Filho, A.A.; Nunes, G.A.; Bueno, P.C.; de Sousa, J.P.; Bastos, J.K.; Sforcin, J.M. Effect of Baccharis dracunculifolia D.C. (Asteraceae) extracts and its isolated compounds on macrophage activation. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2007, 59, 463–468. [Google Scholar]
  9. Park, Y.K.; Paredes-Guzman, J.F.; Aguiar, C.L.; Alencar, S.M.; Fujiwara, F.Y. Chemical constituents in Baccharis dracunculifolia as the main botanical origin of Southeastern Brazilian propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1100–1103. [Google Scholar]
  10. Shimizu, K.; Ashida, H.; Matsuura, Y.; Kanazawa, K. Antioxidative bioavailability of artepillin C in Brazilian propolis. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 424, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shimizu, K.; Das, S.K.; Baba, M.; Matsuura, Y.; Kanazawa, K. Dietary artepillin C suppresses the formation of aberrant crypt foci induced by azoxymethane in mouse colon. Cancer Lett. 2006, 240, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nakanishi, I.; Uto, Y.; Ohkubo, K.; Miyazaki, K.; Yakumaru, H.; Urano, S.; Okuda, H.; Ueda, J.; Ozawa, T.; Fukuhara, K.; Fukuzumi, S.; Nagasawa, H.; Hori, H.; Ikota, N. Efficient radical scavenging ability of artepillin C, a major component of Brazilian propolis, and the mechanism. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 1452–1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salomão, K.; Dantas, A.P.; Borba, C.M.; Campos, L.C.; Machado, D.G.; Aquino Neto, F.R.; De Castro, S.L. Chemical composition and microbicidal activity of extracts from Brazilian and Bulgarian propolis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Messerli, S.M.; Ahn, M.R.; Kunimasa, K.; Yanagihara, M.; Tatefuji, T.; Hashimoto, K.; Mautner, V.; Uto, Y.; Hori, H.; Kumazawa, S.; Kaji, K.; Ohta, T.; Maruta, H. ArtepillinC (ARC) in BraziliangreenpropolisselectivelyblocksoncogenicPAK1signaling and suppresses the growth of NFtumors in mice. Phytother. Res. 2009, 23, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Paulino, N.; Abreu, S.R.; Uto, Y.; Koyama, D.; Nagasawa, H.; Hori, H.; Dirsch, V.M.; Vollmar, A.M.; Scremin, A.; Bretz, W.A. Anti-inflammatoryeffects of a bioavailablecompound, artepillinC, in Brazilianpropolis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 587, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kimoto, T.; Arai, S.; Kohguchi, M.; Aga, M.; Nomura, Y.; Micallef, M.J.; Kurimoto, M.; Mito, K. Apoptosis and suppression of tumor growth by artepillin C extracted from Brazilian propolis. Cancer Detect. Prev. 1998, 22, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Simões, L.M.; Gregório, L.E.; Silva Filho, A.A.; Souza, M.L.; Azzolini, A.E.; Bastos, J.K.; Lucisano-Valim, Y.M. Effect of Braziliangreenpropolis on the production of reactive oxygen species by stimulatedneutrophils. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 94, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Banskota, A.H.; Tezuka, Y.; Prasain, J.K.; Matsushige, K.; Saiki, I.; Kadota, S. Chemical constituents of Brazilian propolis and their cytotoxic activities. J. Nat. Prod. 1998, 61, 896–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, Y.K.; Alencar, S.M.; Aguiar, C.L. Botanical origin and chemical composition of Brazilian propolis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2502–2506. [Google Scholar]
  20. Simões-Ambrosio, L.M.; Gregório, L.E.; Sousa, J.P.; Figueiredo-Rinhel, A.S.; Azzolini, A.E.; Bastos, J.K.; Lucisano-Valim, Y.M. The role of seasonality on the inhibitoryeffect of Braziliangreenpropolis on the oxidative metabolism of neutrophils. Fitoterapia 2010, 81, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chitme, H.R.; Chandra, R.; Kaushik, S. Studies on anti-diarrheal activity of Calotropis gigantea R. Br. in experimental animals. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2004, 7, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  22. Palombo, E.A. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Santos, J.L.; Varanda, E.A.; Lima, L.M.; Chin, C.M. Mutagenicity of new lead compounds to treat sickle cell disease symptoms in a Salmonella/ microsome assay. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andrade, N.S.; Perazzo, F.F.; Maistro, E.L. Lack of clastogenic/ genotoxic effects of Baccharis dracunculifolia extract on Swiss mouse peripheral blood cells. Genet. Mol. Res. 2008, 7, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Monteiro Neto, M.A.B.; Souza Lima, I.M.; Furtado, R.A.; Bastos, J.K.; Silva Filho, A.A.; Tavares, D.C. Antigenotoxicity of artepillin C in vivo evaluated by the micronucleus and comet assays. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Loh, D.S.; Er, H.M.; Chen, Y.S. Mutagenic and antimutagenic activities of aqueous and methanol extracts of Euphorbia hirta. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 126, 406–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Munari, C.C.; Resende, F.A.; Alves, J.M.; de Sousa, J.P.; Bastos, J.K.; Tavares, D.C. Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of Baccharis dracunculifolia extract in chromosomal aberration assays in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Planta Med. 2008, 74, 1363–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Munari, C.C.; Alves, J.M.; Bastos, J.K.; Tavares, D.C. Evaluation of the genotoxic and antigenotoxic potential of Baccharis dracunculifolia extract on V79 cells by the comet assay. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2010, 30, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Izuta, H.; Narahara, Y.; Shimazawa, M.; Mishima, S.; Kondo, S.; Hara, H. 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity of bee products and their constituents determined by ESR. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2009, 32, 1947–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zahin, M.; Aqil, F.; Ahmad, I. Broad spectrum antimutagenic activity of antioxidant active fraction of Punica granatum L. peel extracts. Mut. Res. 2010, 703, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mortelmans, K.; Zeiger, E. The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay. Mut. Res. 2000, 455, 29–60. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ajith, T.A.; Soja, M.A. Comparative study on the antimutagenicity of atorvastatin and lovastatin against directly acting mutagens. Cell Biol. Toxicol. 2006, 22, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sghaier, M.B.; Boubaker, J.; Neffati, A.; Limem, I.; Skandrani, I.; Bhouri, W.; Bouhlel, I.; Kilani, S.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Ghedira, K. Antimutagenic and antioxidant potentials of Teucrium ramosissimum essential oil. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 1754–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xia, Y.; Cheng, S.; He, J.; Liu, X.; Tang, Y.; Yuan, H.; He, L.; Lu, T.; Tu, B.; Wang, Y. Effects of subchronic exposure to benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) on learning and memory, and neurotransmitters in male Sprague-Dawley rat. Neurotoxicology 2011, 32, 188–198. [Google Scholar]
  35. Schwarz, D.; Kisselev, P.; Cascorbi, I.; Schunck, W.H.; Roots, I. Differential metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene and benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol by human CYP1A1 variants. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 453–459. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ross, J.; Nelson, G.; Kligerman, A.; Erexson, G.; Bryant, M.; Earley, K.; Gupta, R.; Nesnow, S. Formation and persistence of novel benzo[a]pyrene adducts in rat lung, liver, and peripheral blood lymphocyte DNA. Cancer Res. 1990, 50, 5088–5094. [Google Scholar]
  37. Chakravarti, D.; Venugopal, D.; Mailander, P.C.; Meza, J.L.; Higginbotham, S.; Cavalieri, E.L.; Rogan, E.G. The role of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts in inducing mutations in mouse skin. Mut. Res. 1990, 649, 161–178. [Google Scholar]
  38. Chen, L.; Devanesan, P.D.; Higginbotham, S.; Ariese, F.; Jankowiak, R.; Small, G.J.; Rogan, E.G.; Cavalieri, E.L. Expanded analysis of benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts formed in vitro and in mouse skin: Their significance in tumor initiation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1996, 9, 897–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baird, W.M.; Hooven, L.; Mahadevan, B. Carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adducts and mechanism of action. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2005, 45, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cao, P.; Cai, J.; Gupta, R.C. Effect of green tea catechins and hydrolyzable tannins on benzo[a]pyrene-induced DNA adducts and structure-activity relationship. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23, 771–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.; Ogata, M.; Hirai, H.; Kawagishi, H. Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by manganese peroxidase from the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete sordida YK-624. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2011, 314, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mirzayans, R.; Liuzzi, M.; Paterson, M.G. Methyl methanesulfonate induced DNA damage and its repair in culture human fibroblasts: normal rates of induction and removal of alkali - labile sites in Xeroderma pigmentosum (group A) cells. Carcinogenesis 1988, 12, 2257–2263. [Google Scholar]
  43. Resende, F.A.; Tomazella, I.M.; Barbosa, L.C.; Ponce, M.; Furtado, R.A.; Pereira, A.C.; Bastos, J.K.; Andrade e Silva, M.L.; Tavares, D.C. Effect of the dibenzylbutyrolactonelignan (−)-hinokinin on doxorubicin and methyl methanesulfonate clastogenicity in V79 Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts. Mut. Res. 2010, 700, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Quiles, J.L.; Huertas, J.R.; Battino, M.; Mataix, J.; Ramirez-Tortosa, M.C. Antioxidant nutrients and adriamycin toxicity. Toxicology 2002, 180, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pan, M.H.; Ghai, G.; Ho, C.T. Food bioactives, apoptosis and cancer. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2008, 52, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maron, D.M.; Ames, B.N. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mut. Res. 1983, 113, 173–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bernstein, L.; Kaldor, J.; Mccann, J.; Pike, M.C. An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. Mut. Res. 1982, 97, 267–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Santos, F.V.; Colus, I.M.S.; Silva, M.A.; Vilegas, W.; Varanda, E.A. Assessment of DNA damage induced by extracts and fractions of Strychnos pseudoquina, a Brazilian medicinal plant with antiulcerogenic activity. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2006, 44, 1585–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lira, W.M.; dos Santos, F.V.; Sannomiya, M.; Rodrigues, C.M.; Vilegas, W.; Varanda, E.A. Modulatory effect of Byrsonima basiloba extracts on the mutagenicity of certain direct and indirect-acting mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium assays. J. Med. Food 2008, 11, 111–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Neigi, P.S.; Jayaprakasha, G.K.; Jena, B.S. Antioxidant and antimutagenic activities of pomegranate peel extracts. Food Chem. 2003, 80, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Vargas, V.M.; Mota, V.E.; Henriques, J.A. Mutagenic activity detected by the Ames test in river water under the influence of petrochemical industries. Mut. Res. 1993, 319, 31–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Resende, F.A.; Munari, C.C.; De Azevedo Bentes Monteiro Neto, M.; Tavares, D.C.; Bastos, J.K.; Da Silva Filho, A.A.; Varanda, E.A. Comparative Studies of the (Anti) Mutagenicity of Baccharis dracunculifolia and Artepillin C by the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. Molecules 2012, 17, 2335-2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032335

AMA Style

Resende FA, Munari CC, De Azevedo Bentes Monteiro Neto M, Tavares DC, Bastos JK, Da Silva Filho AA, Varanda EA. Comparative Studies of the (Anti) Mutagenicity of Baccharis dracunculifolia and Artepillin C by the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test. Molecules. 2012; 17(3):2335-2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032335

Chicago/Turabian Style

Resende, Flávia Aparecida, Carla Carolina Munari, Moacir De Azevedo Bentes Monteiro Neto, Denise Crispim Tavares, Jairo Kenupp Bastos, Ademar Alves Da Silva Filho, and Eliana Aparecida Varanda. 2012. "Comparative Studies of the (Anti) Mutagenicity of Baccharis dracunculifolia and Artepillin C by the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test" Molecules 17, no. 3: 2335-2350. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules17032335

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop