Next Article in Journal
Alkaloids from Stems of Esenbeckia leiocarpa Engl. (Rutaceae) as Potential Treatment for Alzheimer Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis and Biological Activity of trans-Tiliroside Derivatives as Potent Anti-Diabetic Agents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 15
Issue 12
10.3390/molecules15129184
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Volatile Compounds of Young Wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay Varieties Grown in the Loess Plateau Region of China

by
Bao Jiang
1 and
Zhenwen Zhang
1,2,*
1
College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
2
Shaanxi Engineering Research Center for Viti-Viniculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2010, 15(12), 9184-9196; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15129184
Submission received: 6 October 2010 / Revised: 6 December 2010 / Accepted: 8 December 2010 / Published: 10 December 2010
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In order to elucidate the aroma components of wine produced in the Loess Plateau region of China, volatile compounds of young wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay varieties grown in the new ecological region were investigated for the first time in this research. Among the volatile compounds analyzed by HS-SPME with GC-MS, a total of 45, 44 and 42 volatile compounds were identified and quantified in Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay wines, respectively. In the volatiles detected, alcohols formed the most abundant group in the aroma compounds of the three wines, followed by esters and fatty acids. According to their odor active values (OAVs), 18 volatile compounds were always present in the three wines at concentrations higher than their threshold values, but ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate, and isoamyl acetate were found to jointly contribute to 92.9%, 93.3%, and 98.7%, of the global aroma of Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay wines, respectively. These odorants are associated with “fruity’’ and ‘‘ripe fruit’’ odor descriptors.

1. Introduction

Wine, which is produced by fermentation of fresh grapes or must, is one of the most complex alcoholic beverages, and its aroma substances are responsible for much of this complexity [1]. Wine flavor can be classified into three groups: varietal, fermentative and wine ageing aroma. Describing the aroma of wines is not a simple task for researchers, because more than 800 aroma compounds such as alcohols, esters organic acids, aldehydes, ethers, ketones and terpenes, etc., have been identified in them [2], with a wide concentration range varying between hundreds of mg/L to the μg/L or ng/L levels [3], and their combinations form the character of wine and differentiates one wine from another.
Aroma of a wine is one of the major factors that determine its nature and quality [4,5] and it can be influenced by several factors: environment (soil and climate), grape variety, ripeness, fermentation conditions, biological factors (yeast and other components of the oenological microflora), the wine production process and aging [6]. Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay are popular varieties all over the world, and much research had been carried out to study the aroma from the two monovarietal wines during the last few decades [7,8,9], whereas Cabernet Gernischet is a special wine-grape variety only cultivated in Jiaodong Peninsula and Changli County of China, and is used by Chinese wineries to prepare premium quality wines.
Several analytical methods have been used for the extraction and determination of volatile compounds. Previously, volatile aroma analysis relied on distillation, solvent extraction, or concentration on solid-phase supports to isolate and concentrate aroma compounds [10,11,12]. These methods are time consuming, result in extensive solvent use, waste and solvent costs, and can result in losses of some important volatiles depending on solvent selectivity and volatility. In addition, liquid–liquid extractions frequently require heating the sample, which can result in component degradation and artifact formation. Headspace analysis (both static and dynamic) has been widely used for the analysis of grape and wine volatiles [13,14]. However, static headspace analysis often suffers from poor sensitivity for trace volatiles and dynamic headspace analysis suffers from interferences from water and ethanol [15,16].
Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) has now widely been used for the analysis of aroma volatiles in many food and beverage matrices in recent years [17]. SPME integrates the extraction, concentration and introduction in one step and the use of SPME results in reducing preparation time and simultaneously increasing sensitivity over other extractions. Therefore, it could be considered as a simple, efficient and environment-friendly sample preparation method, numerous SPME applications for volatiles in wines have been reported [18,19,20].
With the development of the Chinese wine industry, grape-growing areas have been increasing, and new wine-growing regions are being constantly discovered, including the Loess Plateau region of China which occupies about 600 thousand square kilometers. Rongzi Chateau of Xiangning County is located in Loess Plateau region, where the different characteristics of the landform such as crisscross gulleys, different slopes, slope direction and altitude contribute together to form the local mountainous microclimate. The mean annual temperature and that of the coldest month (January) are 9.9 °C and −6 °C, respectively. Active accumulated temperature (≥10 °C) is more than 2,998 °C with proper precipitation (annual rainfall around 50 cm). The climatic characteristics of dryer air, stronger sunshine, and a wide swing in diurnal temperature differences distinguished by lower night-time temperatures create an especially healthy environment for vines in the Loess Plateau region, but to date, there has been no published research on the volatile characteristics of wines produced in the Loess Plateau region of China, and their study could help winemakers optimize operational conditions (harvest parameters, juice preparation, fermentation techniques, use of yeasts, bacteria and enzymes, etc.) in order to emphasize one or more aromas in the final wines. In this study, we selected three representative varieties, Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay, which are separately cultivated at Rongzi Chateau in Xiangning County, and investigated the volatile compounds of three monovarietial wines, with volatiles being extracted by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and detected by GC–MS.

2. Results and Discussion

The experimental results are given in Table 1. In all 54 volatile compounds were identified in the three wines studied, including 23 alcohols, 13 esters, eight acids, three terpenes and seven aldehyde and ketone compounds. Many of these volatile compounds are commonly found in wines and are derived from grapes and yeast strain fermentation and the vinification process [21].
Table
Table 1. The threshold values and concentration of volatile components found in the Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay young wines.
Table 1. The threshold values and concentration of volatile components found in the Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay young wines.
CompoundsThreshold(μg/L)Odor descriptorConcentration (μg/L)
Cabernet SauvignonCabernet GernischetChardonnay
Alcohols
1-Propanol 306,000dFresh, alcoholND2715.96491.9
Isobutyl alcohol 40,000aFusel, alcohol22004.119778.19379.0
1-Butanol150,000cMedicinal, alcohol1587.61083.4945.2
Isoamyl alcohol30,000aCheese185587.5144784.9103021.5
1-Pentanol 80,000jFruity, balsamic176.1146.8ND
4-Methyl-1-pentanol50,000h—106.881.028.5
2-Heptanol70eFruity, mouldy, musty14.78.1ND
1-Hexanol8000aGreen, grass4017.72542.81163.7
3-Hexen-1-ol,(E)-400aGreen, floral133.892.655.0
3-Hexen-1-ol,(Z)-400aGreen135.8129.254.4
2-Hexen-1-ol,(E)-400jGreen grass, herb47.3NDND
2-Hexen-1-ol ,(Z)-400jGreen grass, herbNDND16.6
2-Octanol 120a—24276.6NDND
1-Heptanol1000jGrape, sweet212.2129.022.3
2-Ethyl-1-hexanol8000jMushroom, sweet fruitytraceNDND
2-Nonanol58e—6.3ND3.7
2,3-Butanediol,[R-(R*,R*)]-120,000iButter, creamy405.4475.1527.9
1-Octanol120aIntense citrus , roses44.225.217.0
3-(Methylthio)-1-propanol500aBoiled potato, rubber1990.22006.8ND
1-Decanol 400aOrange flowery, special fatty10.79.47.7
Benzyl alcohol200,000fCitrusy, sweet150.4137.8ND
2-Phenylethanol14,000aFlowery, pollen, perfumed14504.818164.69165.8
1-Dodecanol1000iUnpleasant at high concentration, flowery at low concentration897.01770.7ND
Subtotal (μg/L) 256309.2194081.4130900.2
Subtotal (%) 64.759.246.6
Esters
Ethyl acetate 7500aFruity, sweet52205.769820.232920.7
Isobutyl acetate1600aSolvent NDND339.4
Isoamyl acetate30aBanana14733.813999.924849.9
Ethyl hexanoate5aFruity, anise4107.22985.15535.6
Hexyl acetate670dPleasant fruity, pear142.4144.9562.6
Ethyl lactate154,636cLactic, raspberry11724.28119.42223.6
Heptyl acetate1400jAlmond, pear14143.9ND5733.0
Methyl octanoate200kIntense citrus8.58.55.4
Ethyl octanoate 2aPineapple, pear, floral5107.94284.013767.8
Ethyl decanoate200aFruity, fatty, pleasant1451.21522.57962.0
Diethyl succinate500,000cLight fruity182.9266.846.3
Phenethyl acetate250aPleasant, floralND37.2310.4
Ethyl dodecanoate1500jFlowery, fruity222.7264.52028.6
Subtotal (μg/L) 104030.4101453.096285.3
Subtotal (%) 26.331.034.2
Acids
Acetic acid200,000aAcid, fatty18901.211538.323016.1
Propanoic acid8100fVinegarish213.3907.2ND
Isobutyric acid200,000aFatty2916.42335.31798.4
Isovaleric acid33.4bFatty, rancidND1961.2898.0
Hexanoic acid3000aCheese, rancid, fatty1709.81155.11714.3
Heptanoic acid3000gFatty, drytraceNDND
Octanoic acid500aRancid, harsh, cheese, atty acid5205.93848.511208.7
Decanoic acid15,000aFatty, unpleasant2877.72477.412089.7
Subtotal (μg/L) 31824.324223.050725.2
Subtotal (%) 8.07.418.0
Aldehydes and ketones
Nonanal 1lGreen, slightly pungent49.069.918.5
Benzaldehyde2000dAlmond348.695.2349.9
Geranylactone60jFloral29.826.426.4
β-Ionone0.09bVioletND5.8ND
Decanal1000hGrassy, orange skin-likeND2175.0ND
Furfural14,100aPungent125.9ND182.6
Acetoin150,000aFlowery, wet3378.55595.82645.7
Subtotal (μg/L) 3931.87968.13232.2
Subtotal (%) 1.02.41.2
Terpenes
Citronellol100aGreen lemon14.414.59.4
Linalool 25.2bFruity, citricNDNDtrace
Limonene200eFlowery, green, citrusND124.336.1
Subtotal (μg/L) 14.4138.845.5
Subtotal (%) <0.1<0.1<0.1
Total 396110.1327864.3281188.4
The data were mean values of triplicate samples (maximum SD: ±10%); ND, Not determined; a [30]; b [7]; c [36]; d [37]; e [38]; f [39]; g [40]; h [41]; I [9], j [42], k[43], l [44].

2.1. Alcohols

Alcohols represented the largest group in terms of the number and concentration of aroma compounds identified in all three wines, followed by esters and fatty acids. The subtotal concentrations of alcohols in the three wines were in the 130,900.2–256,309.2 μg/L range, being 46.6–64.7% of the total volatile compounds detected.
Alcohols are formed from the degradation of amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids [22]. The composition of alcohols differed both qualitatively and quantitatively among the three wines. This volatile fraction was mainly composed of isoamyl alcohol, 2-octanol, isobutyl alcohol and 2-phenylethanol; these four alcohols had concentrations >9,000 μg/L, (and existed in at least one of the wines studied). Isoamyl alcohol was the most abundant alcohol, accounting for >72% of the total alcohols in all three wines studied. Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernischet wines contained 20 and 18 types of alcohols, respectively, and the alcohol profiles of the two wines were more diverse than that of Chardonnay wine which only contained 15 types of alcohols. (E)-2-Hexen-1-ol, 2-octanol and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol were absent in the wine made from Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay. Other missing alcohols in Chardonnay wine were 1-pentanol, 2-heptanol, 3-(methylthio)-1-propanol, benzyl alcohol and 1-dodecanol, and in Cabernet Gernischet wine they were (Z)-2-hexen-1-ol and 2-nonanol. In Cabernet Sauvignon wine, 1-propanol and (Z)-2-hexen-1-ol were absent, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol was only present in trace amounts.

2.2. Esters

There were also significant differences in the type and amount of esters present in the three wines. In general, the number and proportion of esters in Chardonnay wine (34.2%) were higher than those of Cabernet Gernischet (31.0%) and Cabernet Sauvignon (26.3%), but the total ester contents in the three wines exhibited the opposite order. Although their amounts differed in the three wines, ethyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, ethyl lactate and ethyl octanoate were the major esters found in the aroma compounds. Phenethyl acetate and heptyl acetate were absent in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernischet wines, respectively, while isobutyl acetate was unique to Chardonnay wine. Acetate esters are the result of the reaction of acetyl-CoA with higher alcohols formed from degradation of amino acids or carbohydrates [23]. On the other hand, fatty acid ethyl esters are produced enzymatically during yeast fermentation and from ethanolysis of acyl-CoA formed during fatty acid synthesis or degradation. Their concentration depends on several factors: yeast strain, fermentation temperature, aeration degree and sugar content [23]. Ethyl lactate, a product of malolactic fermentation during wine vinification [24], was lower in Chardonnay wine than in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernischet wines.

2.3. Fatty acids

The production of fatty acids has been reported to be dependent on the composition of the must and fermentation conditions [25]. Acetic acid was the major fatty acid found, constituting 45.4% to 59.4% of the total fatty acid content of the wines. Acetic acid is produced during alcoholic and malolactic fermentation. At low levels this compound lifts wine flavors; however, at high levels, it is detrimental to the taste of wine by leaving the wine tasting sour and thin [26]. Heptanoic acid could only be identified as a trace component in Cabernet Sauvignon wine. Isovaleric acid and propanoic acid were absent in Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay wines, respectively. Isobutyric acid, hexanoic acid, octanoic acid, and decanoic acid were found in all three wines. These C6 to C10 fatty acids at concentrations of 4 to 10 mg/L impart mild and pleasant aroma to wine; however, at levels beyond 20 mg/L, their impact on wine becomes negative [27]. The C6 to C10 fatty acids might have a positive impact on the aroma of the three wines examined in the current study since their levels were all far below 20 mg/L.

2.4. Terpenes

Numerous studies have reported that the terpenoid compounds could be used analytically for varietal characterization. It is known that terpene compounds are secondary plant constituents, whose biosynthesis begins with acetyl- CoA [28]. The formation of terpenes by Saccharomyces cerevisiae has not previously been observed and terpenes are not changed by the yeast metabolism during fermentation [29]. In the present study, three terpenes were detected in the wines. They were citronellol, linalool and limonene, and their concentrations were very low. They made up of less than 0.1% of the total volatile compounds in all three wines. Linalool was found solely in Chardonnay wine, the limonene could only be detected in Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay wines. Hence, these terpenyl compounds could serve as potential indicators to distinguish wine derived from Chardonnay from those from Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernischet [8].

2.5. Aldehydes and ketones

The composition of aldehydes and ketones varied greatly between the wines. Nonanal, benzaldehyde, geranylactone and acetoin were found in all three, whereas β-ionone and decanal were unique in the aroma compounds of Cabernet Gernischet wine, and furfural existed only in Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay wines.

2.6. Odor activity values (OAVs)

Though dozens of volatiles were detected in each wine sample, not all of the components have the same impact on the overall aroma character of a wine. Of all the compounds analyzed, only those displaying OAVs greater than 1 were deemed to contribute to wine aroma [30]. The contribution of each volatile compound with OAVs above 1 to the aroma of each wine can be evaluated qualitatively by means of its associate descriptor, and quantitatively by means of its OAVs.
Table
Table 2. Odor activity values a (OAVs) and relative odor contribution b (ROC) for the aroma compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet, and Chardonnay young wines.
Table 2. Odor activity values a (OAVs) and relative odor contribution b (ROC) for the aroma compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet, and Chardonnay young wines.
CompoundsOdor descriptorCabernet SauvignonCabernet GernischetChardonnay
Ethyl octanoatePineapple, pear, floral 2554.0 (61.4%)2142.0 (62.7%)6883.9 (77.0%)
Ethyl hexanoate Fruity, anise 821.4 (19.7%) 597.0 (17.5%) 1107.1 (12.4%)
Isoamyl acetateBanana 491.1 (11.8%)446.7 (13.1%)828.3 (9.3%)
2-Octanol—202.3 (4.9%)——
NonanalGreen, slightly49.0 (1.2%)69.9 (2.0%) 18.5 (0.2%)
β-Ionone Violet —64.4 (1.9%) —
Isovaleric acidFatty, rancid —58.7 (1.7%) 26.9 (0.3%)
Ethyl decanoateFruity, fatty, pleasant 7.3 (0.2%) 7.6 (0.2%) 39.8 (0.4%)
Octanoic acid Rancid, harsh, cheese 10.4 (0.2%) 7.7 (0.2%) 22.4 (0.3%)
Heptyl acetateAlmond, pear10.1 (0.2%)—4.1 (<0.1%)
Ethyl acetate Fruity, sweet 7.0 (0.2%) 9.3 (0.3%) 4.4 (<0.1%)
Isoamyl alcohol Cheese 6.2 (0.1%)4.8 (0.1%) 3.4 (<0.1%)
3-(Methylthio)-1-propanolBoiled potato, rubber4.0 (0.1%)4.0 (0.1%)-
Decanal ——2.2 (<0.1%)—
1-Dodecanol Orange flowery, special fatty0.9 (<0.1%) 1.8 (<0.1%) —
Ethyl dodecanoateFlowery, fruity0.2 (<0.1%)0.2 (<0.1%)1.4 (<0.1%)
2-Phenylethanol Flowery, pollen, perfume1.0 (<0.1%)1.3 (<0.1%) 0.7 (<0.1%)
Phenethyl acetatePleasant, floral—0.1 (<0.1%)1.2 (<0.1%)
a OAVs were expressed as the mean concentration of an aroma compound divided by its odor threshold value; b ROC of each aroma compound shown in parentheses was calculated as the ratio of the OAV of the individual compound to the total OAV of each wine.
Table 2 listed the OAVs for the 18 odor-active compounds (OAV > 1 in at least one of the wines studied), Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon wines had the same odorants with OAVs above 1, and in contrast, Cabernet Gernischet wine contained the most odor-active compounds, suggesting that the Cabernet Gernischet wine presented more complex flavor than the others. In addition, the OAVs for ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate and isoamyl acetate in Chardonnay wine were close to two times higher than those of Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernishcet wines.
The computation of relative odor contribution (ROC) proposed by Ohloff [31] is a useful index for determining the important aroma components in a complex system. Based on the ROC values of single compound, we found that the global aroma of all three wines was dominated by fermentative aromas, namely, the ethyl esters of fatty acids that conferred fruity notes to all the wines. Specifically, ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate, and isoamyl acetate jointly accounted for 92.9%, 93.3%, and 98.7%, of the global aroma of Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay wines, respectively (Table 2). The results in this study were partially consistent with the results in a previous study [8] showing that the three aroma compounds mentioned above jointly accounted for 97% and 99%, respectively, of the global aroma of Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Gernischet wines from Huailai County of China. In our study, alcohols were the predominant groups which constituted the aroma compounds rather than acids as in the previous study [8]. Thirteen aroma compounds whose concentrations are higher than threshold values from the Chardonnay wine produced in Changli County of China were identified [9]. In contrast, 12 aroma compounds whose concentrations are higher than threshold values were idenified in present study, among which seven aroma compounds, namely ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate, isoamyl acetate, ethyl decanoate, octanoic acid, isoamyl alcohol, and phenethyl acetate overlapped with ones in the study above. The characteristics of local climate and soil could lead to the discrepancy between our results and others. Based on the OAVs and the ROC values of aroma compounds, ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate, and isoamyl acetate are able to exert a strong influence on wine aroma: they are responsible for a major part of the aroma characteristics of young wines, but it does not mean they are the most significant aroma compounds in terms of sensory evaluation, and sensory studies are necessary to further confirm the impact of the odor-active compounds already identified. In contrast, the contributions of phenylethyl acetate and 2-phenylethanol were minimal. Based on their ROC, phenylethyl acetate and 2-phenylethanol each accounted for less than 1% of the global aroma perceptions of the three wines. According to Escudero et al. [32], even if they were present at a concentration higher than their threshold values, compounds such as fusel alcohols, acids, esters and volatile phenols are not able to affect individually the flavor of the wines. This is because these compounds are common in any kind of fermented alcoholic beverages that share similar aromatic properties. Moreover, the aromatic buffer would be caused by the presence in wine of relatively high concentrations of ethanol, ethyl esters, fusel alcohols, volatile phenols, β-damascenone, and fatty acids and can be broken only by the presence of an aroma with very different aroma properties, such as 4-methyl-4-mercaptopentan-2-one.

3. Experimental

3.1. Vineyard conditions and vinification

All vineyards are located in the Rongzi Chateau of Xiangning County in the Loess Plateau region, which is situated approximately between 35°59′–36°02′ N, 110°47′–110°50′ E with an altitude of 1,200–1,300 m, and where the loess depth exceeds 200 m. In the collection all the vineyards have similar characteristics (age and cultivation management). All the vines were cultivated in Spring 2007, in a seedling root system with multiple main vine fan-training, and 2.5 × 1.0 m (row × vine) spacing.
All grape berries were harvested manually at optimum technological maturity, as judged by indices of sugar and acid content in 2009. Pre-fermentation treatments and winemaking were performed as described by Li [33]. Briefly, grapes were crushed on an experimental destemmer-crusher and then transferred to stainless-steel containers. Thirty L of each treatment wine were produced in three replicates. Fifty mg/L of SO2 and 30 mg/L of pectinase (Lallzyme Ex) were added to the musts and the contents were mixed by hand. After maceration of the musts for 24 h, 200 mg/L of dried active yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, Lallemand, Danstar Ferment AG, Switzerland) was added to the musts, according to commercial specifications. Alcoholic fermentation was carried out at 20 to 25 °C to dryness (reducing sugar < 4 g/L) which took place over a 6–8 days period and density controls were maintained during this period. At the end of alcoholic fermentation the wines were separated from pomace, and then added 50 mg/L of SO2. After fermentation, the wine samples were bottled and stored at 5 °C prior to analysis. All the samples were five months old at the time of analysis. Total sugar, total acidity, pH, total phenolics, total tannins, reducing sugar and ethanol were analyzed [34] (Table 3).
Table
Table 3. General composition of the three musts and wines.
Table 3. General composition of the three musts and wines.
Cabernet SauvignonCabernet GernischetChardonnay
MustWineMustWineMustWine
Total sugar (g/L)194.0—196.5—185.3—
Total acidity a (g/L)10.48.910.48.98.76.0
PH3.13.03.13.13.73.4
Total phenolics b (mg/L)34301152279011931760192
Total tannins c (mg/L)4060933349010381850191
Reducing sugar (g/L)—1.7—2.0—1.3
Ethanol (%,v/v)—11.8—12.2—12.7
The data were mean values of triplicate samples (maximum SD: ±10%); a Acidity expressed as grams of tartaric acid equivalents per liter; b Total phenolics expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents per liter; c Tannins expressed as milligrams of tannin acid equivalents per liter.

3.2. Reagents

All standards were purchased from Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA) and Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Purity of all standards was above 99%. Model solutions were prepared using the methods reported by Howard et al. [35]. 4-Methyl-2-pentanol was used as the internal standard. For quantification, 8-point calibration curves for each compound were prepared using the method described by Ferreira et al. [7], which was also used as a reference to determine the concentration range of standard solutions. The regression coefficients of calibration curves were above 98%.

3.3. HS-SPME procedure

Aroma compounds of the wine samples were extracted by HS-SPME and analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry as described by Zhang et al. [8]. Five milliliters of wine sample and 1 g NaCl were placed in a 15-mL sample vial. The vial was tightly capped with a PTFE-silicon septum and heated at 40 °C for 30 min on a heating platform agitation at 400 rpm. The SPME (50/30-μm DVB/Carboxen/PDMS, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA), preconditioned according to manufacturer’s instruction, was then inserted into the headspace, where extraction was allowed to occur for 30 min with continued heating and agitation by a magnetic stirrer. The fiber was subsequently desorbed in the GC injector for 25 min.

3.4. GC–MS analysis

The GC-MS system used was an Agilent 6890 GC equipped with an Agilent 5975 mass spectrometer. The column used was a 60 m × 0.25 mm HP-INNOWAX capillary with 0.25 μm film thickness (J & W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The carrier gas was helium at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Samples were injected by placing the SPME fiber at the GC inlet for 25 min with the splitless mode. The oven’s starting temperature was 50 °C, which was held for 1 min, then raised to 220 °C at a rate of 3 °C /min and held at 220 °C for 5 min. The mass spectrometry in the electron impact mode (MS/EI) at 70 eV was recorded in the range m/z 20 to 450 U. The mass spectrophotometer was operated in the selective ion mode under autotune conditions and the area of each peak was determined by ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies). Analyses were carried out in triplicate.

3.5. Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted by SPSS 16.0 for Windows with three replications of the same sample.

4. Conclusion

This work shows the first study on volatile compounds of young wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay varieties grown in the Loess Plateau region of China. In this study, a total of 45, 44 and 42 volatile compounds were identified and quantified in Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay wines, respectively. The three young wines analyzed were characterized by the presence of higher levels of higher alcohols, esters and fatty acids. According to the OAVs and ROC values, 18 volatile compounds were always present in the three wines at concentrations higher than their threshold values, but ethyl octanoate, ethyl hexanoate and isoamyl acetate were the most characteristic aroma-active compounds of the three young wines.

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System (nycytx-30-zp-04), we thank Yifan Jiang in the Department of Plant Science, University of Tennessee for his critical reading of the manuscript.
  • Sample Availability: Contact the authors.

References and Notes

  1. Ortega, C.; Lopez, R.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Fast analysis of important wine volatile compounds: Development and validation of a new method based on gas chromatographic-flame ionisation detection analysis of dichloromethane microextracts. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 923, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Marti, M.P.; Mestres, M.; Sala, C.; Busto, O.; Guasch, J. Solidphase microextraction and gas-chromatography olfactometry analysis of successively diluted samples. A new approach of the aroma extract dilution analysis applied to the characterization of wine aroma. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51, 7861–7865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ebeler, S. Analytical chemistry: Unlocking the secrets of wine flavor. Food Rev. Int. 2001, 17, 45–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Selli, S.; Cabaroglu, T.; Canbas, A.; Erten, H.; Nurgel, C.; Lepoutre, J.P.; Gunata, Z. Volatile composition of red wine from cv. Kalecik Karasi grown in central Anatolia. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Diez, J.; Dominguez, C.; Guillen, D.A.; Veas, R.; Barroso, C.G. Optimization of stir bar sorptive extraction for the analysis of volatile phenols in wines. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1025, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rodríguez-Bencomo, J.J.; Conde, J.E.; Rodríguez-Delgado, M.A.; García-Montelongo, F.; Pérez-Trujillo, J.P. Determination of esters in dry and sweet white wines by headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 963, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferreira, V.; Lápez, R.; Cacho, J.F. Quantitative determination of the odorants of young red wines from different grape varieties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, M.X.; Xu, Q.F.; Duan, C.Q.; Qu, W.Q.; Wu, Y.W. Comparative study of aromatic compounds in young red wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, and Cabernet Gernischet Varieties in China. J. Food Sci. 2007, 72, 248–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, H.; Tao, Y.S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L. Impact odorants of Chardonnay dry white wine from Changli County (China). Eur. Food Res. Tech. 2008, 227, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Selli, S.; Canbas, A.; Varlet, V.; Kelebek, H.; Prost, C.; Serot, T. Characterization of the most odor-active volatiles of orange wine made from a Turkish cv. Kozan (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 227–234. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fariňa, L.; Boido, E.; Carrau, F.; Versini, G.; Dellacasa, E. Terpene compounds as possible precursors of 1, 8-cineole in red grapes and wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1633–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Karasek, P.; Planeta, J.; Varadova, E.; Mikesova, E.; Golias, J.; Roth, M.; Vejrosta, J. Direct continuous supercritical fluid extraction as a method of wine analysis: Comparison with conventional indirect extraction and implications for wine variety identification. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1002, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Noble, A.C.; Flath, R.A.; Forrey, R.R. Wine head space analysis: Reproducibility and application to varietal classification. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1980, 28, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Castro, M.; Natera, R.; Garcí, M.V.; García, C. Optimization of headspace solid-phase microextraction for the analysis of volatile phenols in wine. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 995, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Canuti, V.; Conversano, M.; Calzi, M.L.; Heymann, H.; Matthews, M.A.; Ebeler, S.E. Headspace solid-phase microextraction–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for profiling free volatile compounds in Cabernet Sauvignon grapes and wines. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216, 3012–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Salinas, M.R.; Alonso, G.L.; Esteban-Infantes, F.J. Adsorption-thermal desorption gas chromatography applied to the determination of wine aromas. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1994, 42, 1328–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wardencki, W.; Michulec, M.; Curyło, J. A review of theoretical and practical aspects of solid-phase microextraction in food analysis. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2004, 39, 703–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chapman, D.M.; Thorngate, J.H.; Matthews, M.A.; Guinard, J.X.; Ebeler, S.E. Yield effects on 2-methoxy-3-isobutylpyrazine concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon using a solid phase microextraction gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 5431–5435. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mestres, M.; Busto, O.; Guasch, J. Application of headspace solid-phase microextraction to the determination of sulphur compounds with low volatility in wines. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 945, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tat, L.; Comuzzo, P.; Stolfo, I.; Battistutta, F. Optimization of wine headspace analysis by solid-phase microextraction capillary gas chromatography with mass spectrometric and flame ionization detection. Food Chem. 2005, 93, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cliff, M.; Yuksel, D.; Girard, B.; King, M. Characterization of Canadian ice wines by sensory and compositional analysis. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2002, 53, 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  22. Antonelli, A.; Castellari, L.; Zambonelli, C.; Carnacini, A. Yeast influence on volatile composition of wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 1139–1144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Perestrelo, R.; Fernandes, A.; Albuquerque, F.F.; Marques, J.C; Camara, J.S. Analytical characterization of the aroma of Tinta Negra Mole red wine: Identification of the main odorants compounds. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 563, 154–164. [Google Scholar]
  24. Gil, M.; Cabellos, J.M.; Arroyo, T.; Prodanov, M. Characterization of the volatile fraction of young wines from the denomination of origin “Vinos de Madrid” (Spain). Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 563, 145–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schreirer, P. Flavor composition of wines: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1979, 12, 59–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Joyeux, A.; Lafon-Lafourcade, S.; Ribéreau-Gayon, P. Evolution of acetic acid bacteria during fermentation and storage of wine. Appl. Environ. Microb. 1984, 48, 153–156. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shinohara, T. Gas chromatographic analysis of volatile fatty acids in wines. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985, 49, 2211–2212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Manitto, P. Byosynthesis of Natural Products; Ellis Horwood: Chichester, England, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mateo, J.J.; Jimenez, M. Monoterpenes in grape juice and wines (review). J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 881, 557–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Guth, H. Quantitation and sensory studies of character impact odorants of different white varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997, 45, 3027–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohloff, G. Scent and Fragrances: the Fashion of Odors and Their Chemical Perspectives; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  32. Escudero, A.; Gogorza, B.; Melús, M.A.; Ortín, N.; Cacho, J.; Ferreira, V. Characterization of the aroma of a wine from Maccabeo: Key role played by compounds with low odor activity values. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 3516–3524. [Google Scholar]
  33. Li, H. Research Progress of Vine and Wine: College of Enology (annual); Shaanxi Agricultural Press: Xi’an, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  34. Office International de la Vigne et du Vin Recueil des methods internationals d’analyse des vins et des mouts; O.I.V.: Paris, France, 1990.
  35. Howard, K.L.; Mike, J.H.; Riesen, R. Validation of a solid-phase microextraction method for headspace analysis of wine aroma components. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2005, 56, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tominaga, T.; Murat, M.L.; Dubourdieu, D. Development of a method for analyzing the volatile thiols involved in the characteristic aroma of wines made from Vitis vinifera L. cv Sauvignon Blanc. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1044–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Peinado, R.A.; Moreno, J.; Bueno, J.E.; Moreno, J.A.; Mauricio, J.C. Comparative study of aromatic compounds in two young white wines subjected to pre-fermentative cryomaceration. Food Chem. 2004, 84, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Du, X.F.; Finn, C.E.; Qian, M.C. Volatile composition and odour-activity value of thornless ‘Black Diamond’ and ‘Marion’ blackberries. Food Chem. 2010, 119, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gámez-Míguez, M.J.; Cacho, J.F.; Ferreira, V.; Vicario, I.M.; Heredia, F.J. Volatile components of Zalema white wines. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 1464–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Souid, I.; Hassene, Z.; Palomo, E.S.; Perez-Coello, M.S.; Ghorbel, A. Varietal aroma compounds of Vitis vinifera L. cv Khamri grown in Tunisia. J. Food Qual. 2007, 30, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lourdes, M.; Luis, Z.; Laura, V.; Manuel, M. Comparison of odor-active compounds in sherry wines processed from ecologically and conventionally grown Pedro Ximenez grapes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 968–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, H. Wine Tasting; China Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  43. Takeoka, G.; Buttery, R.G.; Flath, R.A.; Teranishi, R.; Wheeler, E.L.; Wieczorek, R.L.; Guentert, M. Flavor Chemistry: Trends and Development; ACS Publishing House: Washington, DC, USA, 1989; ACS Symposium Series 388. [Google Scholar]
  44. Buttery, R.G.; Turnbaugh, J.G.; Ling, L.C. Contribution of volatiles to rice aroma. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1988, 36, 1006–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, B.; Zhang, Z. Volatile Compounds of Young Wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay Varieties Grown in the Loess Plateau Region of China. Molecules 2010, 15, 9184-9196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15129184

AMA Style

Jiang B, Zhang Z. Volatile Compounds of Young Wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay Varieties Grown in the Loess Plateau Region of China. Molecules. 2010; 15(12):9184-9196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15129184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Bao, and Zhenwen Zhang. 2010. "Volatile Compounds of Young Wines from Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Gernischet and Chardonnay Varieties Grown in the Loess Plateau Region of China" Molecules 15, no. 12: 9184-9196. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules15129184

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop